Red flags for appropriate referral to the gastroenterologist and the rheumatologist of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis

Impact of gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms on disease activity and functional impairment in patients with spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) exhibits predominantly musculoskeletal symptoms but also significant gastrointestinal (GI) and psychological manifestations. Subclinical gut inflammation is common in SpA, with frequent symptoms such as abdominal pain and diarrhea. Psychological issues like depression and anxiety are also prevalent, with a negative impact on quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of GI and psychiatric symptoms in SpA patients without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and their association with disease characteristics.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study, which included SpA patients from two rheumatology outpatient clinics. Patients were assessed for GI, and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), perceived stress (PSS-10), disease activity (ASDAS, BASDAI) and functionality (BASFI). Laboratory tests included C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fecal calprotectin, and Secretory IgA. Statistical analysis involved Spearman correlation, linear regression, and multiple correspondence discriminant analysis (MCDA).

RESULTS

Among 98 SpA patients, 79.6% had axial SpA. High disease activity and functional impairment were common. 65.3% reported ≥ 2 GI symptoms, predominantly abdominal pain and diarrhea. Depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) was observed in 46.7% of patients, being moderate to severe in 25.0%. Depression, perceived helplessness, and lack of self-efficacy were associated with high disease activity and GI symptoms. MCDA identified strong correlations between depression, GI symptoms, and disease activity.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the association between GI and psychological symptoms with disease activity and functionality in SpA patients. Depression and perceived helplessness are prevalent and closely associated with high disease activity and GI symptoms, suggesting the need for interdisciplinary management from early stages to improve patient outcomes.

Reducing diagnostic delays of extraintestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease: a comparative study of a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic versus conventional referral specialists

Background

Managing extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients remains challenging due to considerable heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria and the lack of a standardised definition and validated diagnostic pathways. Delays in recognising and treating EIMs can lead to significant disease progression. Therefore, early detection and treatment are crucial.

Objectives

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a dedicated immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) clinic in reducing EIM diagnostic delays and improving patients' outcomes.

Design

A single-centre observational study was conducted, including IBD patients presenting with EIMs red flags.

Methods

We compared the EIMs diagnostic delay between patients who attended a multidisciplinary IMID outpatient clinic (IMID-G) and those who attended individual referral specialists representing the standard outpatient clinic group (SOC-G). We further evaluated the impact of diagnostic timing on 18-month clinical outcomes, including therapeutic changes, steroid and immunosuppressant use and biological therapy switch/swap.

Results

We enrolled 238 IBD patients, 127 in the IMID-G and 111 in the SOC-G. The average time to EIM diagnosis was 2.48 ± 1.8 and 5.36 ± 2.3 months for the IMID and SOC-Gs (Δ = 2.88 months, p = 0.005). The majority of patients received a diagnosis of peripheral arthritis (IMID-G = 37.5%; SOC-G = 33.7%) and spondyloarthropathy (IMID-G = 32.1%; SOC-G = 33.7%). No significant difference was observed in the rates of EIMs between the two groups (88.2% in IMID-G vs 92.8% in SOC-G, p = 0.27). Regarding therapeutic changes, the IMID-G reported a mean time to the first therapeutic change driven by the specialist referral of 2.96 ± 1.8 months, compared to 6.09 ± 2.5 months in the SOC-G, showing a significant difference (p = 0.007). The IMID-G had a higher frequency of biological therapy switching/swapping and adding immunosuppressive treatment than the SOC-G (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04, respectively). Survival curves revealed a significant reduction in diagnostic delay and time to treatment in the IMID-G compared to the SOC-G (log-rank test, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Attending a dedicated IMID clinic can enhance the diagnostic process for EIMs in IBD patients, thereby reducing diagnostic delays and allowing early interventions to avoid disease progression.

Joint Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, "Red Flags" for the Early Recognition and Management of Related Arthropathies: A Narrative Review

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, frequently present with extra-intestinal manifestations. Virtually all patients with IBD could be at risk for developing inflammatory arthropathies within the spectrum of spondyloarthritis (SpA). In this context, prompt recognition of musculoskeletal "red flags" (lower back pain, dactylitis, enthesitis, swelling of peripheral joints, musculoskeletal chest pain, family history of SpA, psoriasis, and anterior uveitis) is crucial for early referral and multidisciplinary management by gastroenterologists and rheumatologists. Recent advances have refined diagnostic tools including questionnaires, alongside imaging modalities and laboratory markers, enhancing the detection of SpA in IBD patients. Effective treatment strategies targeting both gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal symptoms may significantly reduce long-term morbidity in these patients. In this narrative review, we aimed to underscore the importance of integrating clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches for optimal patient management and outcome over time.

The holistic management of peripheral spondyloarthritis: focus on articular involvement in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive overview of peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA), focusing specifically on its occurrence and management in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

An exhaustive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies on pSpA in IBD patients. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened for relevance. Data on study design, patient characteristics, diagnostic criteria, main findings, and conclusions were extracted from selected articles. Study quality was assessed using appropriate checklists. Information was synthesized narratively to summarize current understanding.

RESULTS

pSpA is the most common extraintestinal manifestation of IBD, with a median prevalence of 16%. It worsens quality of life and requires collaboration between gastroenterologists and rheumatologists for optimal diagnosis and treatment. Several "red flags" guide appropriate specialist referral of IBD patients with suspected pSpA. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, the choice of therapy depends on IBD phenotype and patterns of articular/axial involvement. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs are first-line biologics, with interleukin (IL)-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors as alternatives for anti-TNF failure. Small molecules like apremilast and Janus kinase inhibitors also have utility. Recommended treatment algorithms exist, but more randomized controlled trials are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Early identification of pSpA is crucial in IBD patients to enable timely intervention, prevent structural damage, and minimize disability. A multidisciplinary, holistic approach addressing musculoskeletal and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations is key to optimal patient outcomes.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Endometriosis: Diagnosis and Clinical Characteristics

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) share some epidemiological, clinical and pathogenetic features. A differential diagnosis between pelvic endometriosis and IBD may be challenging, even for expert clinicians. In the present review, we aimed to summarize the currently available data regarding the relationship between endometriosis and IBD and their possible association. Methods: The PubMed and Scopus database were considered, by searching the following terms: "Crohn's Disease", "Ulcerative Colitis", "Endometriosis", "Adenomyosis", and "Inflammatory Bowel Disease", individually or combined. Full-text papers published in English with no date restriction were considered. Results: Few studies have researched the possible association between endometriosis and IBD. Both conditions are characterized by chronic recurrent symptoms, which may be shared (abdominal pain, fatigue, infertility, menstrual irregularities, diarrhea, constipation). Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) can cause bowel symptoms. In a large Danish study, a 50% increased risk of IBD was observed in women with endometriosis. A missed diagnosis of endometriosis and an increased risk of endometriosis has been reported in IBD. Current evidence does not support an association between endometriosis and IBD characteristics. However, IBD may be associated with DIE, characterized by pelvic symptoms (dyschezia, dyspareunia). Preliminary observations suggest an increased IBD risk in patients with endometriosis treated with hormonal therapy. Conclusions: Current findings suggest that a careful search is needed for concomitant endometriosis in subgroups of patients with IBD showing compatible symptoms and vice versa. A multidisciplinary approach including dedicated gastroenterologists and gynecologists is required for a proper search for IBD and endometriosis in subgroups of patients. This approach may avoid diagnostic delays or overtreatments for these conditions.

[Fever in rheumatological diseases]

Fever is a frequent and important symptom in patients with rheumatological diseases and can be an expression of activity of the underlying rheumatological disease. There is great variability in the incidence of fever as a symptom of the disease between individual diseases. The growing understanding of the molecular signatures of the diseases can help to explain these discrepancies: A genetic overactivation of potently pyrogenic cytokines is the reason why fever is nearly always present in autoinflammatory syndromes. In contrast, fever is less common in polyarthritis and myositis and mostly limited to severe courses of disease. In the diagnostic work-up of fever, frequent differential diagnoses, such as infections, malignancies, side effects of drugs and hypersensitivity reactions should be considered. This article provides an overview of the physiology of the development of fever, describes the relevance of fever in individual rheumatological diseases and proposes a workflow for the clinical clarification of rheumatological patients who present with fever.

The management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis: Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) and Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) recommendations based on a pseudo-Delphi consensus

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is the most frequent extraintestinal manifestation in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). When IBD and spondyloarthritis coexist, musculoskeletal and intestinal disease features should be considered when planning a therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for IBD and SpA have expanded enormously over the last few years, but randomized controlled trials with specific endpoints focused on SpA are not available in the IBD setting. To address this important clinical topic, the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) and the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) jointly planned to draw updated therapeutic recommendations for IBD-associated SpA using a pseudo-Delphi method. This document presents the official recommendations of IG-IBD and SIR on the management of IBD-associated SpA in the form of 34 statements and 4 therapeutic algorithms. It is intended to be a reference guide for gastroenterologists and rheumatologists dealing with IBD-associated SpA.

Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases Awareness and Management among Physicians Treating Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An IG-IBD Survey

(1) Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequently associated to other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This study aims at assessing physicians' awareness of the issue and the current status of IMID management. (2) Methods: A web-based survey was distributed to all 567 physicians affiliated to IG-IBD. (3) Results: A total of 249 (43.9%) physicians completed the survey. Over 90% of the responding physicians were gastroenterology specialists, primarily working in public hospitals. About 51.0% of the physicians had access to an integrated outpatient clinic, where gastroenterologists collaborated with rheumatologists and 28.5% with dermatologists. However, for 36.5% of physicians, integrated ambulatory care was not feasible. Designated appointment slots for rheumatologists and dermatologists were accessible to 72.2% and 58.2% of physicians, respectively, while 20.1% had no access to designated slots. About 5.2% of physicians report investigating signs or symptoms of IMIDs only during the initial patient assessment. However, 87.9% inquired about the presence of concomitant IMIDs at the initial assessment and actively investigated any signs or symptoms during subsequent clinical examination. (4) Conclusions: While Italian physicians recognize the importance of IMIDs associated with IBD, organizational challenges impede the attainment of optimal multidisciplinary collaboration. Efforts should be directed toward enhancing practical frameworks to improve the overall management of these complex conditions.

Clinical and imaging findings in enteropathic spondyloarthritis with special emphasize in diagnostic delay: a cross-sectional study

Background

Enteropathic spondyloarthritides (eSpAs) are chronic inflammatory joint diseases associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Limited data are available on the prevalence since arthritis in IBD patients may be underestimated because medications may hide disease activity with a possible diagnostic delay.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate diagnostic delay in eSpA and explore associated demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics.

Design

Single-centre cross-sectional study conducted on consecutive out-patients referred to the combined Gi-Rhe clinic (November 2018-October 2019).

Methods

We analysed eSpA patients for diagnostic delay, disease activity, inflammatory markers, conventional radiography (CR) and magnetic resonance images (MRI) of sacroiliac joints/spine.

Results

A total of 190 eSpA patients [118 peripheral SpA, 72 axial (Ax) SpA including 44 non-radiographic (nr)-axSpA] were enrolled. axSpA patients had a higher prevalence of men sex, HLA-B27 positivity, uveitis and pancolitis compared with peripheral eSpA. Median diagnostic delay in eSpA was 48 months (IQR 6-77) with no difference between axial and peripheral patients. Radiographic-axial SpA (r-axSpA) patients displayed a higher diagnostic delay compared with nr-axSpA (median/IQR 36/17-129 versus 31/10-57 months, p = 0.03) and were older, with longer disease duration, low education status and high rate of employment than patients with nr-axSpA. r-axSpA patients with sclerosis, syndesmophytes and bridge at CR had higher diagnostic delay than those without lesions. Men showed higher prevalence of spine damage lesions than women as sclerosis, squaring, syndesmophytes and bridges. Longer disease duration was detected in patients with radiographic damage as bridge and sacroiliitis grade 3. On MRI, sacroiliac bone oedema was associated with reduced diagnostic delay, whereas bone erosions were associated with higher diagnostic delay compared with that in patients without these lesions. Patients with psoriasis displayed a higher diagnostic delay compared to those without skin involvement.

Conclusion

Diagnostic delay was higher in r-axSpA compared with nr-axSpA despite the same treatment. Demographic, clinical features and radiological lesions were associated with diagnostic delay.

Activity of axial spondyloarthritis after one year of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

The disease activity of axSpA after initiating anti-TNF agents for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is poorly understood. We sought to examine the disease activity of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) after initiation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents among patients with IBD. This retrospective cohort study included adults with IBD and axSpA who initiated anti-TNF agents between 1/1/2012-10/1/2021 at a large academic center. The primary outcome was symptom resolution (SR) of axSpA at 12 months ("0/10 pain" or "no pain" or "controlled pain" with no morning stiffness and no use of daily NSAIDs). The secondary outcome was clinical remission (CR) of IBD at 12 months (simple clinical colitis activity index <3, Harvey-Bradshaw Index <5, or provider assessment with no use of oral/IV steroids for 30 days). Associations between baseline characteristics and SR of axSpA were examined using logistic regression. 82 patients with axSpA and IBD initiated anti-TNF agents. At 12 months, 52% and 74% achieved SR of axSpA and CR of IBD, respectively. IBD duration <5 years (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.5) and adalimumab use (reference: all other anti-TNFs; OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.002-7.1) were associated with SR of axSpA at 12 months. 52% of patients with axSpA and IBD achieved SR of axSpA at 12 months after initiating anti-TNF therapy. Shorter disease duration and adalimumab use may be associated with higher odds of SR. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings, examine additional clinical predictors of SR, and identify more effective therapeutics for this population.

SpA plus IBD or IBD plus SpA: Does commutative property apply?

The term spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a group of interrelated disorders characterised by the involvement of the musculoskeletal system as well as extra-articular manifestations like acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Likewise, IBD may present with various extra-intestinal manifestations among which those involving the musculoskeletal system, namely peripheral and axial SpA are the most common. The identification of patients with both SpA and IBD is of paramount importance in clinical practice since the coexistence of these two entities has been associated with great disability and decreased quality of life. In order to achieve an early diagnosis of IBD-SpA it is instrumental that rheumatologists seek for gastrointestinal symptoms in SpA patients and likewise that gastroenterologists seek for inflammatory musculoskeletal symptoms in patients with IBD. This narrative review aims at critically appraising the available evidence about SpA occurring in IBD patients versus IBD occurring in patients with SpA and at highlighting similarities and differences between the two scenarios.

Extra-musculoskeletal manifestations driving the therapeutic decision-making in patients with Spondyloarthritis: a 12-month follow-up prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) such as recurrent acute anterior uveitis (rAAU), psoriasis (Ps), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are related to the Spondyloarthritis (SpA), as well as they are associated with disease activity and poor prognosis. However, there are no data addressing its relevance regarding therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of EMMs to drive the treatment decision-making in patients with SpA in a 12-month follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SpA patients, according to the axial and peripheral ASAS classification criteria, as well as CASPAR criteria, with any active EMM, defined as main entry criteria, were included in this longitudinal cohort study. Individuals with a history of any disease or condition that could be associated with some of the studied endpoints, including neoplasms and infectious diseases, were excluded. Specific tools related to each EMM, including Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), ophthalmologic evaluation, according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria, and gut complaints were used at baseline and during the 3-, 6- and 12-month of follow-up as outcomes measures over time. Descriptive and inferential analyses were used appropriately, including Pearson's correlation test, chi-squared test, and ANOVA. P value less than 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

A total of 560 patients were enrolled, of whom 472 meet the eligibility criteria. The majority (N = 274; 59.6%) had one or more EMM related to SpA umbrella concept. Among the EMM, the one that most influenced therapeutic decision-making was psoriasis (28.5%), followed by uveitis (17.5%) and IBD (5.5%), regardless of musculoskeletal manifestations. Clinical improvement of EMMs outcomes was observed in most patients over 12-month follow-up, especially in those with rAAU and IBD (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that EMMs guided the therapeutic decision-making in half of SpA patients, regardless of musculoskeletal condition, suggesting the inter-disciplinarity among the rheumatologist, ophthalmologist, dermatologist, and gastroenterologist plays a crucial role to manage them.

Creation of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Referral Pathway for Identifying Patients Who Would Benefit From Inflammatory Bowel Disease Specialist Consultation

BACKGROUND

Recommendations regarding signs and symptoms that should prompt referral of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to an IBD specialist for a consultation could serve to improve the quality of care for these patients. Our aim was to develop a consult care pathway consisting of clinical features related to IBD that should prompt appropriate consultation.

METHODS

A scoping literature review was performed to identify clinical features that should prompt consultation with an IBD specialist. A panel of 11 experts was convened over 4 meetings to develop a consult care pathway using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Items identified via scoping review were ranked and were divided into major and minor criteria. Additionally, a literature and panel review was conducted assessing potential barriers and facilitators to implementing the consult care pathway.

RESULTS

Of 43 features assessed, 13 were included in the care pathway as major criteria and 15 were included as minor criteria. Experts agreed that stratification into major criteria and minor criteria was appropriate and that 1 major or 2 or more minor criteria should be required to consider consultation. The greatest barrier to implementation was considered to be organizational resource allocation, while endorsements by national gastroenterology and general medicine societies were considered to be the strongest facilitator.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel referral care pathway identifies key criteria that could be used to triage patients with IBD who would benefit from IBD specialist consultation. Future research will be required to validate these findings and assess the impact of implementing this pathway in routine IBD-related care.

Peripheral Spondyloarthritis Presenting with Fever and Severe Systemic Inflammatory Response Mimicking Infection: A Case Series and Literature Review

Objective

To describe four peripheral spondyloarthritis patients presenting with fever and severe systemic inflammatory response mimicking infection.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2019, four patients with the final diagnosis of peripheral spondyloarthritis had atypical presentation of fever and severe systemic inflammatory response requiring hospital admission and extensive workup.

Results

We reported four patients who were admitted to the hospital for fever and arthritis. They all had laboratory tests of the severe systemic inflammatory response (leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, high ESR, and high CRP) concerning infection. They underwent extensive workup for infectious causes, including septic arthritis, which came back negative. Other rheumatic diseases that are known to present with fever such as adult-onset Still's disease, reactive arthritis, and crystal arthritis were all excluded. The final diagnosis of spondyloarthritis was made during their follow-up: three patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis and one with psoriatic arthritis. All patients received conventional DMARDs (methotrexate and sulfasalazine) and two patients received tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in addition to conventional DMARDs to control their disease.

Conclusion

We observed a subgroup of peripheral spondyloarthritis patients presenting with fever and severe systemic inflammatory response requiring hospitalization. Recognition of this subgroup is important and should be considered once an infection is ruled out.

Spondyloarthritis with inflammatory bowel disease: the latest on biologic and targeted therapies

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a heterogeneous group of chronic inflammatory diseases that can affect both axial and peripheral joints, tendons and entheses. Among the extra-articular manifestations, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with considerable morbidity and effects on quality of life. In everyday clinical practice, treatment of these conditions requires a close collaboration between gastroenterologists and rheumatologists to enable early detection of joint and intestinal manifestations during follow-up and to choose the most effective therapeutic regimen, implementing precision medicine for each patient's subtype of SpA and IBD. The biggest issue in this field is the dearth of drugs that are approved for both diseases, as only TNF inhibitors are currently approved for the treatment of full-spectrum SpA-IBD. Janus tyrosine kinase inhibitors are among the most promising drugs for the treatment of peripheral and axial SpA, as well as for intestinal manifestations. Other therapies such as inhibitors of IL-23 and IL-17, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, α4β7 integrin blockers and faecal microbiota transplantation seem to only be able to control some disease domains, or require further studies. Given the growing interest in the development of novel drugs to treat both conditions, it is important to understand the current state of the art and the unmet needs in the management of SpA-IBD.

IL-17 inhibitor-associated inflammatory bowel disease: A study based on literature and database analysis

Objective: Few real-world studies have shown clear association between interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) onset. This study investigated the reporting prevalence and evaluated the clinical features and management of IL-17 inhibitor-related IBD events. Methods: We used the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and retrieved data, from 2015 to 2022, on IL-17 inhibitors to identify gastrointestinal inflammatory events and conduct disproportionality analyses by estimating the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Furthermore, case reports and case series, from 2015 to 30 November 2022, on IBD induced by IL-17 inhibitors were collected for retrospective analysis. Results: A total of 388 cases of primary suspected IL-17 inhibitor-associated gastrointestinal events were reported (268 IBD and 120 colitis), including 348 cases involving secukinumab (SEC), 36 cases involving ixekizumab (IXE), and 4 cases involving brodalumab (BRO). Statistically significant reporting rates of total IBD events were observed for SEC and IXE (ROR = 2.13, 95% CI [1.96-2.30] and ROR = 2.79, 95% CI [2.39-3.27], respectively), whereas BRO did not trigger a safety signal. Twenty-nine studies, which included 34 cases, showed evidence of IBD, following SEC (79.4%) and IXE (20.6%) treatment. The median age was 42 years; typical initial symptoms included diarrhea (90.9%), abdominal pain (57.6%), bloody diarrhea (51.5%), and fever (36.4%). The median time to onset of IBD symptoms was 2.9 months. Some cases were accompanied by elevated white blood cell (WBC) count (87.5%), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; 85.7%), C-reactive protein (CRP; 100%), and fecal calprotectin (FC; 100%). Cessation of IL-17 inhibitors plus treatment with corticosteroids and TNF antagonists, as either monotherapy or in combination, could lead to complete clinical remission. The median time to remission after IL-17 inhibitor discontinuation was 4 weeks. Conclusion: IL-17 inhibitor treatment is associated with exacerbation and new onset of IBD and colitis. Obtaining a detailed patient history before initiation of treatment and monitoring gastrointestinal symptoms and intestinal inflammatory biomarkers during IL-17 inhibitor treatment is important for safe use of these drugs.

Cytokines in Spondyloarthritis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Implications

Spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases are chronic immune disorders of the joints and the gut that often coexist in the same patient, increasing the burden of each disorder, worsening patients' quality of life, and influencing therapeutic strategies. Genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, microbiome features, immune cell trafficking, and soluble factors such as cytokines contribute to the pathogenesis of both articular and intestinal inflammation. Most of the molecular targeted biological therapies developed over the last two decades were based on evidence that specific cytokines may be involved in these immune diseases. Despite pro-inflammatory cytokine pathways sharing the pathogenesis of both articular and gut diseases (i.e., tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-23), several other cytokines (i.e., interleukin-17) may be differently involved in the tissue damage process, depending on the specific disease and the organ involved in inflammation, making difficult the identification of a therapeutic plan that is efficacious for both inflammatory manifestations. In this narrative review, we comprehensively summarize the current knowledge on cytokine involvement in spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases, underlining similarities and differences among their pathogenetic pathways; finally, we provide an overview of current and potential future treatment strategies to simultaneously target both articular and gut immune disorders.

Spondyloarthropathy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Pathophysiology to Pharmacological Targets

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) represents one of the most frequent extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Evidence of shared genetic and molecular pathways underlying both diseases is emerging, which has led to rational approaches when treating patients with concomitant diseases. Clinical efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has been ascertained over the years, and they currently represent the cornerstone of treatment in patients with IBD and SpA, but the therapeutic armamentarium in these cases has been recently expanded. Evidence for vedolizumab is controversial, as it was associated both with improvement and development of arthralgias, while ustekinumab, the first anti-interleukin 12/23 (IL-12/23) approved for IBD, has demonstrated good efficacy, especially in peripheral arthritis, and more IL-23 inhibitors are being developed in IBD. Tofacitinib was the first Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor to be approved in IBD, and as it demonstrated efficacy in treating ankylosing spondylitis, it may represent a good choice in axial arthritis, while more selective JAK inhibitors are yet to be approved. Unexpectedly, the first anti-IL17 that was studied in IBD (secukinumab) has shown not to be effective in treating IBD, and the role of anti-IL17 drugs in these diseases needs further investigation. Therefore, as availability of biologics and small molecules is increasing, their positioning in clinical practice is becoming more and more challenging, and multidisciplinary management needs to be implemented in both research and clinical settings in order to enhance early recognition of SpA in IBD patients, optimize treatment and ultimately improve the patients' quality of life.

Inflammatory bowel disease and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: looking at the less frequent associations

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often have other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), and the prevalence of any IMID is higher in IBD patients than in the general population. IBD and other IMIDs involve alterations in innate and adaptive immune responses. Their co-occurrence depends on shared immune and inflammatory processes, pathogenic mechanisms, and genetic and environmental risk factors, including drugs, especially tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The more common IMIDs associated with IBD have been widely described, so this review focuses on the less frequent associations. The IMIDs discussed here are skin disorders (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa, and hidradenitis suppurativa), hepato-pancreatic diseases (autoimmune hepatitis, granulomatous hepatitis, and autoimmune pancreatitis), endocrine diseases (autoimmune thyroid diseases, and type 1 diabetes mellitus), multiple sclerosis, and respiratory diseases (asthma, bronchiectasis, and interstitial pneumonia). The early detection of IMIDs in IBD patients is important to prevent their deleterious clinical course and limit their psychological impact. Care for IBD patients with IMIDs should be multispecialist, with a single therapeutic strategy instead of treating each disease separately.

Validation of screening criteria for spondyloarthritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is one of the most common extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Diagnostic delay must be avoided.

AIMS

We assessed the validity of SpA screening criteria (any of the following characteristics: chronic low back pain with onset before 45 years of age; inflammatory lower back pain or alternating buttock pain; arthritis; heel enthesitis; dacylitis; HLA-B27 positivity; sacroiliitis on imaging).

METHODS

This was a multicenter cross-sectional observational study in IBD patients aged ≥18 years. After evaluating the SpA screening criteria, the gastroenterologists referred the participants to the rheumatologists, who determined whether the patient fulfilled the screening criteria and carried out the necessary tests for SpA diagnosis.

RESULTS

35 (11.7%) out of 300 patients were diagnosed with SpA. The combination with the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (91.4% and 72.1%, respectively, when applied by the rheumatologists; 80% and 78.9%, when applied by the gastroenterologists) for SpA screening, was fulfillment of any of the following: chronic low back pain with onset before age 45 years, inflammatory low back pain or alternating buttock pain, arthritis, or dactylitis.

CONCLUSION

This is one of the first studies to validate SpA screening criteria in IBD patients in routine clinical practice.

Early Spondyloarthritis Clinic: Organizational Improvements in the Patient Journey

Spondyloarthritis are chronic inflammatory diseases affecting spine, peripheral joints and enthesis, as well as extra-articular sites (bowel, eyes, skin). Diagnosis of spondyloarthritis often is slow and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The “Early SpA Clinic” project aimed at improving the patient care and journeys, by solving some organizational issues existing in Rheumatology Clinics. The “Early SpA Clinic” involved 19 Italian Rheumatology Centers using in-depth organizational analyses to identify areas for improvement. From the results of the analyses, some organizational solutions were suggested, and their impact measured at the end of the project through specific KPI. With the implementation of the suggested organizational solutions, Centers achieved relevant results, positively impacting on all the phases of the patient journey: decrease in waiting lists (−23%) and in the time length to transit the Center (−22%), increase in the percentage of new diagnoses (+20%), in the saturation of outpatient clinic capacity (+16%), and in the patient satisfaction (+4%). Centers involved in the “Early SpA Clinic” implemented several organizational actions based on an overall assessment of their activities and on solutions that required no additional resources. Overall, the Centers achieved the “Early SpA Clinic” objectives in terms of better management of resources, personnel, spaces, equipment, in relation to the volumes of patients.

Ulcerative colitis: understanding the impact of ulcerative colitis on everyday life and exploring the unmet needs of patients

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a life-long disease characterised by flare ups and periods of remission. This market research sponsored by Janssen-Cilag Ltd was designed to gain an understanding of the impact of UC from the patient's perspective and to establish the main unmet needs associated with it.

METHODS

The market research was conducted by telephone among 30 patients in the UK with a diagnosis of moderate to severe UC.

RESULTS

Delayed referral from primary care to secondary care was identified as the key unmet need. Hospital appointments were often unavailable for months and in some cases, it was 6 months before a procedure was performed. Specialists rarely involved the patient in discussions regarding diagnosis and initial treatment. Communications improved when treatment changes became necessary but gaps still existed particularly regarding the continued emotional impact of UC. All patients required treatment changes to regain or maintain control and the response to medications varied between patients. Patients who had transitioned through multiple treatments feared they would run out of options and therefore require surgery. The UC "journey" was highly individualized and patients experienced many emotional "ups and downs".

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare bodies should aim to improve earlier referral to secondary care and waiting times for investigation need to be reduced significantly. Patients felt that specialists could support them in understanding their condition by discussing it with them immediately following diagnosis and by involving them in the development of their individual treatment plans. There is a need for more effective and better tolerated medications to expand the armamentarium and thus reduce the need for surgery.

Extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease in Asian patients: A multinational study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Although inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) incidence has increased over the past two decades in Asia, data on extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) of IBD in Asian patients are limited. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of EIMs in Asian IBD patients.

METHODS

In total, 1,764 patients (1,130 with ulcerative colitis [UC] and 634 with Crohn's disease [CD]) were recruited from 10 tertiary centers in Asia. The medical records of IBD patients were retrospectively reviewed for the presence, clinical characteristics, chronological order, and therapeutic management of EIMs.

RESULTS

EIMs were reported in 199 (11.3%) patients, of which 17 (1.0%) patients had multiple EIMs. EIMs were more prevalent in CD patients (P = 0.02). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.55), stricture (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.41-4.39) and female sex (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.52-4.34), extensive colitis (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.57-4.41) were associated with EIMs in CD and UC patients respectively. EIMs appeared in 8% of patients before IBD diagnosis; 95% of cases with EIM could be managed via first-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

EIM prevalence is lower among Asian IBD patients than among patients from Western countries; however, the risk factors for EIM were similar between both populations.

Clinical management of the most common extra-intestinal manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease focused on the joints, skin and eyes

Extra-intestinal manifestations (EIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occur frequently and contribute to morbidity and reduced quality of life. The musculoskeletal, ocular and cutaneous organ systems are frequently involved in IBD-related EIMs. By focusing on manifestations involving the joints, skin and eyes, this review will discuss the most common clinically relevant and burdensome EIMs that affect IBD patients, and strives for early recognition, adequate treatment and timely referral. For this purpose, we aimed to create a comprehensive overview on this topic, with the main focus on the treatment of reactive and associated EIMs, including spondyloarthropathies, pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema nodosum, psoriasis and anterior uveitis. The recently developed biologicals enable simultaneous treatment of inflammatory disorders. This review can be used as a helpful guide in daily clinical practice for physicians who are involved in the treatment of IBD patients.

Risk factors of suspected spondyloarthritis among inflammatory bowel disease patients

Background: Occurring in approximately 20-30% of patients, spondyloarthritis is the most common extraintestinal manifestation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Aims: To look for risk factors of spondyloarthritis among inflammatory bowel disease patients.Methods: We modified the STRIPP questionnaire created for psoriatic patients and we created a rapid questionnaire for rheumatologic investigation in IBD patients (STRII). We submitted the questionnaire to all consecutive patients with a known spondyloarthritis in our centre and to patients with a negative rheumatological diagnosis to find the cut-off value. Finally, we prospectively submitted the STRII questionnaire to all consecutive IBD patients in our centre.Results: A cut-off ≥3 correlated with spondyloarthritis with an AUC = 0.91. The STRII questionnaire was submitted to 1147 IBD patients. Two hundred and forty-four out of 1147 (21.3%) collected a STRII score of ≥3. Female sex (p < .0001) and Crohn's disease (p = .023) were risk factors. Patients with a history of at least 1 immunosuppressant or biologic drug (p = .002 and p < .0001, respectively) had a higher rate of positivity to STRII questionnaire.Conclusion: Among IBD patients, females, Crohn's disease, those with a history of at least 1 immunosuppressive or biological therapy are at increased risk of spondyloarthritis.