The diagnosis and management of subclinical hypothyroidism is assay-dependent- Implications for clinical practice

Agreement between routinely used immunoassays for thyroid function testing in non-pregnant and pregnant adults

OBJECTIVE

Thyroid function tests are common biochemical analyses, and agreement between the routinely used immunoassays is important for diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Efforts are continuously made to align the biochemical assays, and we aimed to evaluate the agreement between immunoassays used in a clinical laboratory setting among non-pregnant and pregnant adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Serum samples were obtained from 192 blood donors (non-pregnant adults) and from 86 pregnant women in the North Denmark Region with no known thyroid disease.

MEASUREMENTS

Each sample was used for measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with the routinely used automatic immunoassays in the regional Departments of Clinical Biochemistry (Alinity, Abbott Laboratories, Cobas, Roche Diagnostics, and Atellica, Siemens Healthineers) and reported as the median with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

In nonpregnant adults, the level of TSH was higher with Cobas and Atellica than with Alinity as reflected by median (Alinity: 1.39 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.30-1.51 mIU/L); Cobas: 1.57 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.48-1.75 mIU/L); Atellica: 1.74 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.61-1.83 mIU/L)). Similarly, a trend was seen towards higher median TSH with Cobas than with Alinity among pregnant women (Alinity: 1.90 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.37-2.82 mIU/L); Cobas: 2.33 mIU/L (95% CI: 1.69-3.62 mIU/L)).

CONCLUSION

Results of thyroid function tests obtained with different immunoassays were not interchangeable when evaluated among pregnant and non-pregnant adults. The distinct differences are relevant for clinical decision making and emphasize the necessity of clinical laboratory information when different assays are used for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with thyroid disease.

Impact of Variation between Assays and Reference Intervals in the Diagnosis of Endocrine Disorders

Method-related variations in the measurement of hormones and the reference intervals used in the clinical laboratory can have a significant, but often under-appreciated, impact on the diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders. This variation in laboratory practice has the potential to lead to an errant approach to patient care and thus could cause harm. It may also be the source of confusion or result in excessive or inadequate investigation. It is important that laboratory professionals and clinicians know about these impacts, their sources, and how to detect and mitigate them when they do arise. In this review article, we describe the historical and scientific context from which inconsistency in the clinical laboratory arises. Examples from the published literature of the impact of the method, reference interval, and clinical decision threshold-related discordances on the assessment and monitoring of various endocrine disorders are discussed to illustrate the sources, causes, and effects of this variability. Its potential impact on the evaluation of growth hormone deficiency and excess, thyroid and parathyroid disorders, hyperandrogenism, hypogonadism, glucocorticoid excess and deficiency, and diabetes mellitus is elaborated. Strategies for assessment and mitigation of the discordance are discussed. The clinical laboratory has a responsibility to recognise and address these issues, and although a lot has been accomplished in this area already, there remains more to be done.

Establishing metrological traceability for small molecule measurands in laboratory medicine

For molecules that can be well described metrologically in the sense of the definition of measurands, and which can also be recorded analytically as individual substances, reference measurement service traceability to a metrologically sound foundation is a necessity. The establishment of traceability chains must be initiated by National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) according to applicable standards; they are at the top and leading position in this concept. If NMIs are not in the position to take up this task, alternative approaches must be sought. Traceability initiatives established by in vitro device industry or academia must meet the quality standards of NMIs. Adherence to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) procedure 15193 must be a matter of course for the establishment of reference measurement procedures (RMPs). Certified reference material (CRM) characterization must be thorough, e.g., by the application of quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance measurements and by adherence to ISO 15194. Both for RMPs and CRMs Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) listing must be the ultimate goal. Results must be shared in a transparent manner to allow other stakeholders including NMIs to reproduce and disseminate the reference measurement procedures.

High-sensitive detection and quantitation of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) from capillary/fingerstick and venepuncture whole-blood using fluorescence-based rapid lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA)

Background

In the last decade, point of care testing (POCT) such as lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) were developed for rapid TSH measurement. Most of these TSH-LFIAs are designed for qualitative measurements (i.e., if TSH values > 5, or >15 IU/L) and as screening tests for primary hypothyroidism in children and adults. Serum or plasma, but not venepuncture whole-blood or fingerstick/capillary, are usually used to quantify TSH accurately. Studies on performance evaluation of TSH-LFIAs POCT using venepuncture or fingerstick whole-blood are limited. Additionally, limited studies evaluated the performance and validity of TSH-LFIAs POCT compared to valid and reliable reference methods. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate three different blood withdrawal techniques for evaluating POCT of TSH.

Aim

We aim to evaluate the performance of a new fluorescence-based LFIA and its Finecare™ fluorescent reader for quantitative measurement of TSH from a fingerstick, venepuncture whole-blood, and serum.

Methods

102 fingerstick, venepuncture whole-blood, and serum samples (with normal and abnormal TSH values) were analyzed by Finecare™ Rapid Quantitative LFIA test and Roche CobasPro-c503 as a reference test.

Results

Using serum, when compared to CobasPro-c503 reference method, Finecare™ showed high sensitivity [90.5 % (69.6-98.8)] and specificity [96.3 % (89.6-99.2)] for diagnosis of thyroid abnormalities (<0.35 or >4.5 mIU/L). The actual test values (mIU/L) of Finecare™ showed excellent agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.85) and strong correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001) with CobasPro-c503. Using venepuncture whole-blood samples, Finecare™ showed similar results to serum with high sensitivity [95.2 % (76.2-99.9)], specificity [97.5 % (91.4-99.7)], excellent agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.91), and very strong correlation (r = 0.95, p < 0.0001) with CobasPro-c503. These results suggest that Finecare™ can be used for quantitative measurement of TSH using serum or venepuncture whole-blood. These key performance indicators were slightly decreased when fingerstick whole-blood samples were used: sensitivity [85.7 %(63.7-97)], specificity [90.0 %,(81.5-96)], good agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.7) and very strong correlation (r = 0.9, p < 0.0001) with CobasPro-c503. A subgroup analysis of abnormal TSH samples revealed a strong and significant correlation between the reference, Finecare™ whole-blood (r = 0.692; p = 0.0015), and fingerstick test Finecare™ (r = 0.66; p = 0.0025). A very strong correlation was also observed between Cobaspro-c508 serum and Finecare™ serum (r = 0.88; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In comparison to the reference assay, our study demonstrates that Finecare™ exhibits high sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and a strong correlation. These findings provide evidence that Finecare™ is a reliable, valid, and accurate point-of-care test for TSH screening and quantitative measurement, especially in non- or small laboratory settings.

Comparison of Five Different Criteria for Diagnosis of Subclinical Hypothyroidism in a Large-Scale Chinese Population

BACKGROUND

Several different criteria for subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) have been used in the literature, but the performance of these criteria was unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic criteria for SCH.

METHODS

Eligible participants were based on centration of thyroglobulin antibodies (TG-Ab), thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab), and five thyroid-related hormones including total thyroxine (TT4), total triiodothyronine (TT3), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). Euthyroid individuals were identified via specific criteria. Five different SCH diagnostic criteria were compared based on the distributions of those indicators. An appropriate TSH cut-off value was reconsidered.

RESULTS

The study included 145,015 participants. The number of SCH cases diagnosed using criterion 5 was significantly different compared to the cases diagnosed using criteria 1-4 (P<0.05) and had the highest positive proportions of TG-Ab and TPO-Ab. Analysis of 60,515 subjects with normal other thyroid hormones revealed a median TSH concentration of 2.04 mIU/L, and the P _2.5-P _97.5 CI was 0.48-7.03 mIU/L. When the threshold for TSH elevation was elevated from ≥4.5 mIU/L to ≥6.50 mIU/L, the number of diagnosed SCH cases decreased from 7.30% to 2.09% and the proportions of positive TG-Ab and TPO-Ab increased from 23.69% and 24.07% to 33.75% and 35.06%, respectively (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of an elevated TSH and normal TT3, TT4, FT3, and FT4 concentrations is a must for the diagnosis of SCH. A new TSH threshold should be identified for better patient monitoring and management, according to the real-world characteristics of TSH distribution in Chinese population.

Samples spiked with pituitary-derived thyroid-stimulating hormone may disguise the extent of differences between thyroid-stimulating hormone assays

BACKGROUND

A large discordance in the diagnosis and potential management of hypothyroidism using Abbott and Roche thyroid assays has been reported recently. The difference in Abbott and Roche thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) results in these studies was larger than anticipated from the external quality assessment (EQA) reports.

METHODS

Abbott and Roche TSH method means in UK NEQAS for thyroid hormones distributions 430 to 454 were compared against the amount of TSH spiked. A TSH deplete serum pool was spiked with various concentrations of pooled high TSH serum and 3rd WHO International Standard for TSH (WHO-IS). Four serum pools with TSH close to clinical decision limits were spiked with two concentrations of WHO-IS.

RESULTS

On review of EQA data, median (IQR) Roche: Abbott TSH ratio was lower (p < 0.001) in 48 pools spiked with TSH (1.11 (1.07-1.16)) compared to 41 pools not spiked (1.29 (1.25-1.31)) and the decrease was proportionate to the contribution of spiked TSH to total TSH in the samples (ρ=-0.908, p < 0.001). In spiking experiments, the relationship of Roche and Abbott TSH was different in TSH deplete pool spiked with WHO-IS (RocheTSH=1.13*AbbottTSH-0.52) and high TSH serum (RocheTSH=1.43*AbbottTSH-0.50), respectively. The Roche: Abbott TSH ratio decreased and the method agreement improved on spiking serum pools with WHO-IS.

CONCLUSION

Abbott and Roche TSH assays are not in harmony in human serum samples but the agreement was better in samples spiked with WHO-IS which contains pituitary-derived TSH. Use of pituitary-derived TSH spiked samples, such as provided by EQA schemes, may mask clinically significant between-assay differences.

Factors influencing the reference interval of thyroid-stimulating hormone in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have reported that the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) reference interval is susceptible to external factors, such as age, sex, race, region and iodine intake. However, no meta-analysis has comprehensively explored the effect of these factors on the TSH reference interval.

METHODS

Articles published from January 1960 to January 2020 were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Medline English databases and CNKI, WanFang and CQVIP Chinese databases. In total, 19 studies were ultimately included. All data were analysed using Review Manager 5.3, STATA 16.0 software, GraphPad Prism 8.0 and Microsoft Excel 2010 to draw the TSH concentration curve.

RESULTS

The TSH reference interval was significantly influenced by sex and age. The mean of TSH concentration in females was 0.27 mIU/L higher than that in males. Reference interval of TSH is divided into 20-59 years old and >60 years old age groups in males, and 20-39 years old and >40 years old age groups in females. Regardless of sex, TSH concentrations all increase with age. In iodine-deficient areas, TSH reference intervals were generally lower than those in iodine-sufficient or iodine-excessive areas. The TSH reference interval in Asia and North American countries was generally higher than that in most European countries. In the subgroup analyses of sample size, region and assay methods and manufacturers, the between-group differences were significant.

CONCLUSION

The TSH reference interval was significantly influenced by sex, age, iodine intake, sample size, region, and assay methods and manufacturers, but other factors should not be ignored. Therefore, it is necessary for each laboratory to validate an appropriate TSH reference interval based on local conditions.

Method-dependent variation in TSH and FT4 reference intervals in pregnancy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gestational TSH and FT4 reference intervals may differ according to assay method, but the extent of variation is unclear and has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a systematic review of published studies on TSH and FT4 reference intervals in pregnancy. Our aim was to quantify method-related differences in gestation reference intervals, across four commonly used assay methods, Abbott, Beckman, Roche and Siemens.

METHODS

We searched the literature for relevant studies, published between January 2000 and December 2020, in healthy pregnant women without thyroid antibodies or disease. For each study, we extracted trimester-specific reference intervals (2.5-97.5 percentiles) for TSH and FT4 as well as the manufacturer-provided reference interval for the corresponding non-pregnant population.

RESULTS

TSH reference intervals showed a wide range of study-to-study differences with upper limits ranging from 2.33 to 8.30 mU/L. FT4 lower limits ranged from 4.40 to 13.93 pmol/L, with consistently lower reference intervals observed with the Beckman method. Differences between non-pregnant and first trimester reference intervals were highly variable, and for most studies, the TSH upper limit in the first trimester could not be predicted or extrapolated from non-pregnant values.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms significant intra- and intermethod disparities in gestational thyroid hormone reference intervals. The relationship between pregnant and non-pregnant values is inconsistent and does not support the existing practice in many laboratories of extrapolating gestation references from non-pregnant values. Laboratories should invest in deriving method-specific gestation reference intervals for their population.

Subclinical hypothyroidism or isolated high TSH in hospitalized patients with chronic heart-failure and chronic renal-failure

Sub-clinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is common in heart failure (HF) and advanced renal failure (RF), but it is unclear whether there is a thyroid disease or a transient increase in TSH level. This is a retrospective study of hospitalized patients in medical departments. All patients with SCH and a TSH level up to less than 12 mIU/L were identified. Those who had at least one recurring admission within at least 6 months were included. A change in thyroid function during the last re-admission was determined and classified as an improvement, no change, or worsening of thyroid function. Overall, 126 cases of SCH met the inclusion criteria for re-admission. Analysis of the most recent hospitalization showed that in 100 (79.4%) patients thyroid function improved, in 15 (11.9%) patients thyroid function remained unchanged and only in 11 (8.7%) patients did thyroid function worsen. In most cases, worsening of hypothyroidism was determined by initiation of a low dose levothyroxine treatment. Of the 126 participants, 43 (34.1%) and 22 (17.5%) had a diagnosis of HF and RF (CKD stages 4 and 5), respectively. There was no association between HF or advanced RF and worsening of SCH. No association was found between worsening of hypothyroidism and gender, age, TSH, or creatinine levels in the first hospitalization. A borderline association between elevated CRP levels at first hospitalization and hypothyroidism worsening was found (p = 0.066). Mildly elevated TSH in hospitalized patients with HF and advanced RF is transient and most probably not related to thyroid disease and not associated with age or gender.