Bone structure assessed with pQCT in prepubertal males with delayed puberty or congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Bone quality in endocrine diseases: determinants and clinical relevance

PURPOSE

Bone is one of the main targets of hormones and endocrine diseases are frequent causes of secondary osteoporosis and fractures in real-world clinical practice. However, diagnosis of skeletal fragility and prediction of fractures in this setting could be a challenge, since the skeletal alterations induced by endocrine disorders are not generally captured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), that is the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis in the general population. The aim of this paper is to review the existing evidence related to bone quality features in endocrine diseases, proposing assessment with new techniques in the future.

METHODS

A comprehensive search within electronic databases was performed to collect reports of bone quality in primary hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypercortisolism, growth hormone deficiency, acromegaly, male hypogonadism and diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Using invasive and non-invasive techniques, such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography or DXA measurement of trabecular bone score (TBS), several studies consistently reported altered bone quality as predominant determinant of fragility fractures in subjects affected by chronic endocrine disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of skeletal fragility in endocrine diseases might take advantage from the use of techniques to detect perturbation in bone architecture with the aim of best identifying patients at high risk of fractures.

Impact of gender-affirming treatment on bone health in transgender and gender diverse youth

Both in the United States and Europe, the number of minors who present at transgender healthcare services before the onset of puberty is rapidly expanding. Many of those who will have persistent gender dysphoria at the onset of puberty will pursue long-term puberty suppression before reaching the appropriate age to start using gender-affirming hormones. Exposure to pubertal sex steroids is thus significantly deferred in these individuals. Puberty is a critical period for bone development: increasing concentrations of estrogens and androgens (directly or after aromatization to estrogens) promote progressive bone growth and mineralization and induce sexually dimorphic skeletal changes. As a consequence, safety concerns regarding bone development and increased future fracture risk in transgender youth have been raised. We here review published data on bone development in transgender adolescents, focusing in particular on differences in age and pubertal stage at the start of puberty suppression, chosen strategy to block puberty progression, duration of puberty suppression, and the timing of re-evaluation after estradiol or testosterone administration. Results consistently indicate a negative impact of long-term puberty suppression on bone mineral density, especially at the lumbar spine, which is only partially restored after sex steroid administration. Trans girls are more vulnerable than trans boys for compromised bone health. Behavioral health measures that can promote bone mineralization, such as weight-bearing exercise and calcium and vitamin D supplementation, are strongly recommended in transgender youth, during the phase of puberty suppression and thereafter.

Increased Bone Mineral Density in Male Patients With Idiopathic Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Who Undergo Sex Hormone Therapy: Findings From Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective observational study assessed the long-term impact of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone, combined gonadotropin, or testosterone replacement therapy on total hip, femoral, and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) and Z-scores in adult men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH).

METHODS

In the cross-sectional study, 69 patients were allocated to untreated (n = 42) and treated (n = 27) groups. The untreated group included IHH patients without hormone therapy history, while the treated group included age- and body mass index-matched patients who had received hormone therapy for at least 5 years. The longitudinal study included 53 IHH patients, and their hip and lumbar BMDs were measured several times during hormone therapy. We then evaluated the changes in their BMD.

RESULTS

Our cross-sectional study showed that the treated group had a significantly higher BMD and Z-score for total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine (P < 0.001 for all) than the untreated group, and the average bone mass even reached the age-matched normal range. The prevalence of low BMD was 80.95% and 11.11% in untreated and treated groups, respectively. In the longitudinal study (N = 53), the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMD gradually increased during treatment. The lumbar spine showed a greater increment in BMD compared with the total hip and femoral neck (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sex hormone therapy improved hip and lumbar spine BMD and Z-scores in patients with IHH. The lumbar spine showed a greater improvement in BMD compared with the total hip and femoral neck.