Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients on TSH suppression therapy

Comparison of Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Score in Patients with and without Vertebral Fractures and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Long-Term Serum Thyrotrophin-Suppressed Therapy

INTRODUCTION

The study of BMD provides only partial information on bone health in patients undergoing TSH suppression therapy due to differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The trabecular bone score (TBS), a new parameter assessing bone microarchitecture, is proposed for studying bone in this context. This study aimed to analyze their long-term use in patients with DTC.

METHODS

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray densitometry (DXA) and TBS was assessed with iNsigth software (version 2.0, MediImaps, France) in 145 postmenopausal patients with DTC. Vertebral fractures (VFs) were identified using a semi-quantitative X-ray method.

RESULTS

The BMD at the end of this study did not differ from the initial measurement. However, the TBS decreased from 1.35 ± 0.1 to 1.27 ± 0.1 (p = 0.002). Increased levels of PTH, osteocalcin, and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) were observed, suggesting enhanced bone remodeling. There was an increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia (40.6% and 16.5% to 46.6% and 18.6%, respectively). The proportion of patients with partially degraded and totally degraded TBS increased from 31% and 15.1% to 48.9% and 24.8% by the end of this study. Among the 30 patients with VFs, there were no significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), calcium intake, alcohol consumption, smoking, radioiodine, therapy, or thyroid parameters compared to those without VFs. The odds ratio for VFs increased with osteopenia (OR 2.63). Combining TBS with BMD did not improve discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

The TBS decreased while the BMD remained unchanged. The percentage of patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, whether partially degraded or totally degraded, increased by the end of this study. The predominant discordance was found in partially degraded microarchitectures, with a higher proportion of osteopenic patients compared to those with normal or osteoporotic bone density. The AUC of the combination of TBS and BMD did not enhance discrimination. TBS, radioactive iodine therapy, and sedentary lifestyle emerged as the main distinguishing factors for DTC patients with VFs.

A mathematical algorithm to harmonize measurements for thyroid-stimulating hormone between instruments

BACKGROUND

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is measured differently between diagnostic units using different devices, which makes cross-comparisons challenging. Here, we have developed a mathematical algorithm to harmonize TSH measurements between 2 instruments, the Abbott ISR2000 and the Siemens ADVIA Centaur XP.

METHODS

Applying the principle of the maximum allowable error between the standard curve and real signal values, the minimum number of comparison samples required for TSH hormone detection was calculated for both instruments. Next, a mathematical algorithm describing the relationship between TSH standard curves from both instruments was established. The algorithm was then tested on sample measurements from both instruments, with signals transformed to Siemens ADVIA Centuar XP-type data. Finally, test results were assessed where the relative error was 

RESULTS

Before conversion, the mean percentage error between the TSH results of samples measured on both instruments was 23.20% (>1/2 TEa). After algorithmic transformation, the average percentage error was reduced to 7.93% (<1/2 TEa).

CONCLUSIONS

Our algorithm enables TSH measurements across different instruments to be comparable, and provides a method to harmonize TSH data between laboratories that utilize different instrumentation.

Collapse

Key Words

• Comparability
• Conversion
• Determination
• Mathematical algorithm
• Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Thyrotropin
• Algorithms

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Xin Zhou Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; Jintang First People's Hospital, Chengdu 610400, China
Zaishuan Liu Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Yining Ma College of Mathematics of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Chongwei Zhang Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Yongkang Wu Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; Jintang First People's Hospital, Chengdu 610400, China.

Collapse

Fracture risk and assessment in adults with cancer

Individuals with cancer face unique risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures. Clinicians must consider the additive effects of cancer-specific factors, including treatment-induced bone loss, and premorbid fracture risk, utilizing FRAX score and bone mineral densitometry when available. Pharmacologic therapy should be offered as per cancer-specific guidelines, when available, or local general osteoporosis guidelines informed by clinical judgment and patient preferences. Our objective was to review and summarize the epidemiologic burden of osteoporotic fracture risk and fracture risk assessment in adults with cancer, and recommended treatment thresholds for cancer treatment-induced bone loss, with specific focus on breast, prostate, thyroid, gynecological, multiple myeloma, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This narrative review was informed by PubMed searches to July 25, 2022, that combined terms for cancer, stem cell transplantation, fracture, bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score, FRAX, Garvan nomogram or fracture risk calculator, QFracture, prediction, and risk factors. The literature informs that cancer can impact bone health in numerous ways, leading to both systemic and localized decreases in BMD. Many cancer treatments can have detrimental effects on bone health. In particular, hormone deprivation therapies for hormone-responsive cancers such as breast cancer and prostate cancer, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematologic malignancies, adversely affect bone turnover, resulting in osteoporosis and fractures. Surgical treatments such as hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for gynecological cancers can also lead to deleterious effects on bone health. Radiation therapy is well documented to cause localized bone loss and fractures. Few studies have validated the use of fracture risk prediction tools in the cancer population. Guidelines on cancer-specific treatment thresholds are limited, and major knowledge gaps still exist in fracture risk and fracture risk assessment in patients with cancer. Despite the limitations of current knowledge on fracture risk assessment and treatment thresholds in patients with cancer, clinicians must consider the additive effects of bone damaging factors to which these patients are exposed and their premorbid fracture risk profile. Pharmacologic treatment should be offered as per cancer-specific guidelines when available, or per local general osteoporosis guidelines, in accordance with clinical judgment and patient preferences.

Differentiated thyroid cancer - possible risks of treatment, suppressive therapy and adherence to current recommendations

Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is rare and represents 1-2 % of all human tumors. The incidence of TC has been increasing worldwide. TC comprises of a heterogeneous group of tumours with variable biological activity. Women are mostly affected. TC can be divided in differentiated TC/DTCs (papillary - PTC, follicular - FTC, from Hürthle cells - HCC), medullary carcinoma - MTC and anaplastic thyroid cancer - ATC. In this article, we focus on possible pitfalls of suppression therapy (cardiovascular, bone and mental), particularly in low-risk patients, and we discuss the data on the adherence to guidelines for suppression therapy in DTC.

Application and prospect of trabecular bone score in differentiated thyroid cancer patients receiving thyrotropin suppression therapy

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy is one of the common treatments for most patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Unfortunately, its detrimental effects on bone health are receiving increasing attention. It may increase the risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a relatively new gray-scale texture measurement parameter that reflects bone microarchitecture and bone strength and has been shown to independently predict fracture risk. We reviewed for the first time the scientific literature on the use of TBS in DTC patients on TSH suppression therapy and aim to analyze and compare the utility of TBS with bone mass strength (BMD) in the management of skeletal health and prediction of fracture risk. We screened a total of seven relevant publications, four of which were for postmenopausal female patients and three for all female patients. Overall, postmenopausal female patients with DTC had lower TBS and a significant reduction in TBS after receiving TSH suppression therapy, but their BMD did not appear to change significantly. In addition, TBS was also found to be an independent predictor of osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women with DTC receiving TSH suppression therapy. However, due to limitations in the number of studies and study populations, this evidence is not sufficient to fully demonstrate the adverse effects of TSH suppression therapy on patients' TBS or BMD and the efficacy of TBS, and subsequent larger and more case-cohort studies are needed to further investigate the relationship and application of TBS to TSH suppression therapy in terms of skeletal health impairment and fracture risk in DTC patients.