Impact of timing on soft tissue augmentation during implant treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Soft-tissue volume augmentation during early, delayed, and late dental implant therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on professionally determined esthetics and self-reported patient satisfaction on esthetics

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of soft-tissue volume augmentation during early, delayed, and late dental implant therapy in terms of professionally determined esthetics and self-reported patient satisfaction on esthetics. For this, a comprehensive electronic literature search was performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) reporting professionally determined esthetic outcomes and self-reported patient satisfaction on esthetics (primary outcomes) during early, delayed, and late dental implant placement comparing soft-tissue volume augmentation to the absence of soft-tissue grafting (control) (PICO 1) or comparing various soft-tissue augmentation techniques, procedures, and materials (PICO 2). Secondary outcomes were mucosal thickness (MT), intra- and postoperative complications, marginal soft-tissue-level changes, keratinized tissue width, radiographic marginal bone levels, and clinical parameters for the diagnosis of peri-implant tissue health. The standard mean differences (SMD)/weighted mean differences (WMD) were estimated for the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), self-reported patient satisfaction assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and MT gain for PICO 1 and PICO 2 by employing a random effect model. Five RCTs were included for PICO 1, whereas 7 RCTs and 1 CCT addressed PICO 2. PICO 1: The SMD for the PES between autogenous soft-tissue grafting (SCTG) and the absence of grafting (control group) was 0.47; 95% CI [-0.15, 1.09; p = 0.14] based on 5 RCTs. The SMD for the VAS values for patient-reported satisfaction on esthetics in the SCTG and control group was 0.46; 95% CI [-0.12, 1.03; p = 0.12] (2 RCTs). The WMD for gain of MT amounted to 1.06 mm; 95% CI [0.81, 1.31; p = 0.00] in favor of the SCTG group (3 RCTs). PICO 2: The SMD for the PES comparing collagen-based matrices (CM group) to the SCTG group was -0.32; 95% CI: (-0.57, -0.07; p = 0.01), in favor of the SCTG group (5 RCTs and 1 CCT). The SMD for the VAS for patient-reported satisfaction on soft-tissue esthetics was 0.24; 95% CI: (-0.31, 0.78; p = 0.40) (2 RCTs comparing CM vs. SCTG). The WMD for gain of MT was -0.27 mm; 95% CI: (-0.36, -0.17; p = 0.00), significantly favoring the SCTG group (4 RCTs). Professionally and patient-assessed outcomes showed no substantial differences between autogenous soft-tissue grafting and the absence of grafting for early, delayed, and late implant placement. However, autogenous soft-tissue grafts led to significantly improved esthetic outcomes as assessed by professionals compared to soft-tissue substitutes. Patient-assessed outcomes, nevertheless, were similar regardless of the grafting material (i.e., SCTG or soft-tissue substitute). Therefore, autogenous soft-tissue grafting, though, resulted in a considerably higher gain in mucosal thickness compared to both the absence of soft-tissue grafting and the use of soft-tissue substitutes. Complications and adverse events were rarely reported by the included studies, thus suggesting that many trials underreport harms (e.g., complications).

Effect of free gingival graft dimension on postsurgical shrinkage in posterior implant placement: A prospective parallel cohort study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The impact of free gingival graft (FGG) dimensions on the postsurgical shrinkage of keratinized tissue width (KTW) and surface area in posterior implant sites is unclear. Standardized assessments of how graft dimensions influence KTW and surface area shrinkage rates over a 6-month period after FGG are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective parallel cohort study was to examine the impact of the graft dimensions on the postsurgical shrinkage of KTW and surface area over a 6-month follow-up period after FGG in the posterior regions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty partially edentulous participants with insufficient buccal KTW in the posterior regions were recruited. Before implant placement, participants received FGG procedures and were categorized into single-tooth and dual-tooth groups according to the range of recipient area. Intraoral scanning was performed before and after FGG and at subsequent follow-ups for 6 months. The KTW and surface area shrinkage rates of the grafted area were calculated and statistically analyzed by using the Student t test and ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc tests were performed to compare the shrinkage rate of KTW at various edentulous sites (α=.05).

RESULTS

The mean ±standard deviation KTW shrinkage rate was 18.84 ±5.11% over 6 months postoperatively, and the mean ±standard deviation SA shrinkage rate was 21.53 ±5.70%. The dual-tooth group had a statistically significantly higher KTW shrinkage rate (28.42 ±2.46%) when the second molar edentulous sites were involved (P<.05). Differences in surface area shrinkage rates between the single-tooth and dual-tooth groups over 6 months were statistically similar (P=.239). However, grafts in the second molar area exhibited significantly higher surface area shrinkage rates compared with those at the premolar and first molar areas (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The dimension of free gingival graft tissues did not significantly affect surface area shrinkage rates, and a mean 25% shrinkage rate occurred in the second molar areas.

Dimensional changes in free gingival grafts at implant sites in the reconstructed mandible: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dimensional changes in free gingival grafts (FGG) at implant sites in mandibular reconstruction patients.

METHODS

Patients who received FGG 4 months after implant placement in the reconstructed mandible with no keratinized mucosa (KM) present were invited for re-examination after 36.7 ± 16.8 months (3.06 ± 1.4 years). Immediately after graft extraction (T0), graft width (GW), graft length (GL), graft thickness (GT), graft dimension (GD), and vertical bone height were documented. Re-examination (T1) included clinical examinations (GW, GL, GD, peri-implant probing depths, and modified Sulcus Bleeding Index), radiographic examination (marginal bone level), and medical chart review.

RESULTS

Twenty patients and 62 implants (47 in fibula flaps and 15 in iliac flaps) were included. A significant decrease in GW (51.8%), GL (19.2%), and GD (60.2%), were found between T0 and T1 (p < .001). The univariate analysis showed that GW change was not significantly associated with reconstruction technique, baseline GL, baseline GT, baseline GD, implant location, or type of prosthesis. Implant survival rate of 100% was observed at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the study, free gingival grafts at implant sites in the reconstructed mandible undergo dimensional change that result in a reduction of approximately 60% of the original graft dimension. Graft width decreased over 50%.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

FGG is the standard of care intervention for increasing the amount of KM around implants. This study was the first to evaluate the dimensional change in FGG at implant sites in mandibular reconstruction patients after a medium-term follow-up.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration is not applicable as this study comprehends a retrospective analysis.

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix Versus Free Gingival Graft for Augmenting Peri-Implant Keratinized Mucosa Around Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

There is a growing evidence to suggest augmenting peri-implant keratinized mucosa in the presence of ≤ 2 mm of keratinized mucosa. However, the most appropriate surgical technique and augmentation materials have yet to be defined. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants using free gingival graft (FGG) versus xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) before commencing prosthetic implant treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to identify observational studies comparing implant sites augmented with FGG to those augmented with XCM. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Six studies with 174 participants were included in the present review. Of these, 87 participants had FGG, whereas the remaining participants had XCM. At 6 months, sites augmented with FGG were associated with less changes in the gained width of peri-implant keratinized mucosa compared to those augmented with XCM (mean difference 1.06; 95% confidence interval -0.01 to 2.13; p = 0.05). The difference, however, was marginally significant. The difference between the two groups in changes in thickness of peri-implant keratinized mucosa at 6 months was statistically significantly in favor of FGG. On the other hand, XCM had significantly shorter surgical time, lower postoperative pain score, and higher color match compared to FGG.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitation of this review, the augmentation of keratinized mucosa using FGG before the placement of the final prosthesis may have short-term positive effects on soft tissue thickness. XCM might be considered in aesthetically demanding implant sites and where patient comfort or shorter surgical time is a priority. The evidence support, however, is of low to moderate certainty; therefore, further studies are needed to support the findings of the present review.

Profilometric, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of the L-shape technique combined with delayed connective tissue grafting in the maxillary anterior region: A 3-year case series study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the profilometric, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of peri-implant tissues in the maxillary anterior esthetic zone following guided bone regeneration (GBR) using the L-shape technique combined with delayed connective tissue grafting (CTG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Profilometric and pink esthetic score (PES) measurements were performed at the time of implant surgery with GBR (T0) and at the 1- (T1), 2- (T2), and 3-year (T3) follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes were also assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire. Statistical analysis over 3 years of follow-up assessed changes at time points (T0, T1, T2, and T3) and time periods (T0-T1, T0-T2, and T0-T3) using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (57.5 ± 12.3 years) were included in this study. The mean profilometric change in peri-implant tissues over the 3-year follow-up period was 3.49 ± 1.11 mm, and the buccal contours were not significantly different between the comparison periods. The PES remained stable, while all OHIP-14 domain scores improved significantly.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous implant placement and GBR using the L-shape technique combined with delayed CTG in the maxillary anterior region provides stable buccal profiles and consistent esthetics and improves patient-reported quality of life over a 3-year period.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrated that GBR using the L-shape technique combined with delayed CTG in the maxillary anterior region improved the buccal profile, esthetics, and patient-reported quality of life.

Association of Connective Tissue Grafts in Immediate Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The increase in soft tissue (ST) around implants can benefit peri-implant health and aesthetic results. The objective was to compare the gingival and esthetic health benefits of immediate implant placement (IIP) with simultaneous or delayed connective tissue graft (CTG) compared to IIP without CTG.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out by two reviewers in Medline-Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were considered. Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) that were published between April 2017 and February 2024 were used. Studies that analyzed the performance of a simultaneous or deferred CTG after the placement of an implant in the aesthetic zone, with or without immediate provisionalization, without previous regeneration, with a follow-up of 6 months, and that were performed in humans were included.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis was performed using data provided by the RCTs. The five RCTs that were selected analyzed a total "n" of 245 subjects who met the inclusion criteria and focused on the subject of the study. In the quantitative analysis, four RCTs were included. The studies evaluated buccal gingiva levels when placing the IIP with and without CTG, obtaining a mean buccal gingiva level difference of 0.09 mm (95% CI: -0.54 to 0.72, p = 0.05), statistically not significant, but with a favorable trend.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CTG associated with the II can maintain the gum level but not increase the volume. CTG is favorable for achieving successful esthetic results when immediate placement of an implant with a provisional prosthesis is planned.

Effects of intentional early dense-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane removal on vertical ridge augmentation

BACKGROUND

Vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) requires long healing times for bone maturation. This case study deals with the intentional early removal of a titanium-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (TR-dPTFE) membrane that allowed for treatment times reduction and improvement of bone quality.

METHODS

A TR-dPTFE membrane was used for VRA in the premolar region of the upper right maxilla. The defect was filled with a mix of particulate autogenous bone and porcine xenograft in a 1:1 ratio. After a 4-month uneventful healing period, the membrane was removed, and the thick keratinized palatal tissue was moved toward the buccal side via a pedicle flap. Implants insertion and healing abutments application were carried out 3 months later, when bone graft could have been revascularized and nourished by the periosteum.

RESULTS

The histologic evaluation of a bone sample harvested during implant bed preparation revealed a huge amount of mature newly formed bone even in the most coronal part. Two screw-retained crowns were delivered 2 months after implant insertion and the 3.5-year follow-up showed perfectly maintained hard and soft tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Intentional early removal of TR-dPTFE membrane after a 4-month healing time, with simultaneous soft tissue augmentation via a buccally reposioned pedicle flap, allowed graft revascularization from the periosteum, and resulted in optimal quantity and quality of the regenerated bone. This process shortened the overall treatment times, taking only 9 months from VRA to prosthetic loading. Both augmented hard and soft tissues allowed for crestal bone maintenance around implants.

KEY POINTS

Titanium-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (TR-dPTFE) membranes, due to their closed structure, do not allow the passage of cells and vessels from the periosteum, and revascularization from the residual bone alone is not enough for proper graft maturation and long-term crestal bone maintenance. Early removal of TR-dPTFE membrane allows graft revascularization from the periosteum, and results in optimal quantity and quality of the regenerated bone. Increasing the thickness of the soft tissues, increasing the width of the keratinized mucosa, and repositioning the mucogingival line, via a free gingival graft or a pedicle flap, should be performed simultaneously in the membrane removal phase to reduce the number of surgical interventions, decrease patient morbidity, and shorten the total treatment time.

Soft tissue phenotype modification impacts on peri-implant stability: a comparative cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Soft tissue phenotype modification (STPM) could be performed to maintain peri-implant health. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze tissue alteration around implants following soft tissue phenotype modification during implant uncovering surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had STPM (either pouch roll or modified roll technique) during implant second-stage surgery with at least 12-month follow-up were included. Clinical and radiographic parameters including mucosal tissue thickness (MTT), recession (REC), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), probing pocket depth (PPD), marginal bone loss (MBL), emergence profile, and emergence angle were extracted from 2-week, 2-month, and 12-month visits after second-stage surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with 33 implants that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. After soft tissue phenotype modification, at 2 weeks, REC was negatively correlated to mean MTT at mid-buccal site (r =  - 0.41, p = 0.018) and borderline correlated at mid-lingual site (r =  - 0.343, p = 0.051). Stable KMW was maintained from 2 weeks to 12 months with minimal shrinkage rate (3 ~ 14%). MBL change was limited (0.24 ~ 0.47 mm) after STPM. All implants had shallow PPD (≤ 3 mm) with the absence of bleeding on probing. Emergence angle at the mesial side, however, was significantly correlated to surgical techniques, which indicated pouch roll technique would have 6.96 degrees more than modified roll technique (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue phenotype modification, either pouch roll or modified roll technique, during uncovering surgery resulted in favorable clinical outcomes. Thin mucosal tissue thickness and pouch roll technique are the factors related to more recession at 2 weeks. Pouch roll technique could influence the restorative design by having a wide emergence angle at the mesial side.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Modified and pouch roll techniques during uncovering surgery were viable methods to yield favorable peri-implant health, while the preciseness of pouch roll technique was required to avoid mucosal recession and inadequate restorative design.

Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival graft for augmenting keratinized mucosa around posterior mandibular implants: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) plus apically positioned flap (APF) in augmenting the keratinized mucosa (KM) width (KMW) and thickness (KMT) around posterior mandibular implants and compare it with free gingival graft (FGG) plus APF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty patients with KMW ≤ 2 mm in the posterior mandibular implant site were randomly allocated to the FGG group (FGG plus APF) or the XCM group (XCM plus APF). Clinical assessments, including KMW and KMT, shrinkage rate of established KM, and peri-implant soft tissue health, were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. Additionally, the esthetic outcomes and patient-reported postoperative morbidity were investigated.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the KMW measured 3.60 ± 0.79 mm in the FGG group and 3.28 ± 0.96 mm in the XCM group (p = 0.186). Both groups showed a tendency for graft contraction (FGG, 42.11%; XCM, 53.22%). The KMT measured 1.24 ± 0.34 mm in the FGG group and 0.95 ± 0.29 mm in the XCM group, with statistical difference (p = 0.002). No difference in the peri-implant soft tissue health was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05), but the esthetic outcomes were better in the XCM group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

XCM plus APF rendered a similar clinical efficacy in augmenting KMW as that with FGG plus APF, but with higher shrinkage. XCM plus APF was inferior with respect to FGG plus APF in augmenting KMT. The esthetic outcomes were better with XCM plus APF than FGG plus APF. Clinical relevance XCM plus APF graft was inferior with respect to FGG plus APF in augmenting KMT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2200058027 and date: 03/27/2022.

GUIDED PERI-IMPLANT AUTOGENOUS SOFT TISSUE GRAFTING: CASE REPORT

This case report showed the proof-of-concept of a guided free gingival graft around a dental implant. A 65-year-old male presented to replace his 30 and 31. Once the osseointegration of the 2 implants placed by guided surgery has been achieved, a free gingival graft was indicated. The surgical planning of this graft was performed using the Cone Beam Computed Tomography and archs digital scanning already used for implant placement. The greater palatine foramen and gutter were radiologically located to protect their arterial content. Two surgical guides were designed, one for the palatal donor site and one for the recipient site. The first one will serve both as an incision guide and as a post-operative protective plate. The procedure was free of adverse events. At the 1-year recall, the average gain in keratinized tissue width amounted 2.5 mm. This guided surgery could be used in a patient with insufficient amount of keratinized tissue around a posterior implant. For the first time, it makes it possible to anticipate, accelerate and secure the intervention, to improve the practitioner's comfort and potentially the outcomes of free gingival grafts. Further research and clinical are needed to validate this protocol and to assess its long-term impact on peri-implant health.

Effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures: Consensus report of group 2 of the SEPA/DGI/OF workshop

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the literature in terms of the effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures to increase the mucosal thickness with autogenous grafts or soft tissue substitutes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two systematic reviews (SR) were performed prior to the consensus meeting to assess the following questions. Review 1, focused question: In systemically healthy patients with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis, what is the influence of thin as compared to thick peri-implant mucosa on esthetic outcomes? Review 2, focused question 1: In systemically healthy humans with at least one dental implant (immediate or staged implant), what is the efficacy of connective tissue graft (CTG), as compared to absence of a soft tissue grafting procedure, in terms of gain in peri-implant soft tissue thickness (STT) reported by randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs)? Review 2, focused question 2: In systemically healthy humans with at least one dental implant (immediate or staged implant), what is the efficacy of CTG, as compared to soft tissue substitutes, in terms of gain in peri-implant STT reported by RCTs or CCTs? The outcomes of the two SRs, the consensus statements, the clinical implications, and the research recommendations were discussed and subsequently approved at the consensus meeting during the group and plenary sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a tendency of superior esthetic outcomes in the presence of a thick mucosa. The connective tissue graft remains the standard of care in terms of increasing mucosa thickness.

Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures on tissue thickening around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The first focused question (FQ1) was: What is the efficacy of connective tissue graft (CTG), as compared to the absence of soft tissue grafting procedure, in terms of gain in peri-implant soft tissue thickness (STT) reported by randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs)? The second focused question (FQ2) was: What is the efficacy of CTG, as compared to soft tissue substitutes, in terms of gain in peri-implant STT reported by RCTs or CCTs?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A manual and electronic search was performed for each question to identify RCTs and CCTs published up to July 2020. The primary outcome variable was changes in peri-implant STT and secondary outcomes were marginal bone level (MBL), clinical parameters for the diagnosis of peri-implant health, changes in the position of peri-implant soft tissues, esthetic outcomes, and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs). For primary and secondary outcomes, data reporting mean values and standard deviations for each study were extracted. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences as well as 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight trials were included to answer the first focused question and eight to answer the second one, providing data for 254 and 192 patients, respectively. For the first focused question, a statistically significant difference of 0.64 mm in STT was found in favor of the grafted group (n = 8; 95% CI [0.16; 1.13]; 95% PI [-1.06; 2.35]; p = .01). Moreover, sites treated with CTG exhibited statistically significant less recession than implants without a graft (n = 4; WMD = 0.50 mm; 95% CI [0.19; 0.80]; 95% PI [-0.70; 1.69]; p < .001). For the second focused question, the meta-analysis showed a statistically significant gain of STT in the CTG group when compared to soft tissue substitutes (n = 8; WMD = 0.51 mm; 95% CI [0.28; 0.75]; 95% PI [-0.09; 1.12]; p < .001). Furthermore, the use of CTG resulted in significantly higher pink esthetic score values (n = 3; WMD = 1.02; 95% CI [0.29; 1.74]; 95% PI [-3.67; 5.70]; p = .01) and less recession (n = 2; WMD = 0.50 mm; 95% CI [0.10; 0.89]; 95% PI [not estimable]; p = .014) when compared to soft tissue substitutes. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed for any of the following secondary variables: MBL, clinical parameters for the diagnosis of peri-implant health, position of the interproximal tissues, keratinized mucosa or PROMS (p > 0.05), except for medication intake, which was significantly higher when using CTG as compared to soft tissue substitutes (n = 2; WMD = 1.68; 95% CI [1.30; 2.07]; 95% PI [not estimable]; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue augmentation procedures are efficacious on soft tissue thickening and, in particular, CTG demonstrated a significant STT gain when compared to no graft or soft tissue substitutes.

Use of Xenogenic Collagen Matrices in Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Volume Augmentation: A Critical Review on the Current Evidence and New Technique Presentation

Plastic peri-implant surgical procedures aiming to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants have long been well-described. These are represented by: pedicle soft tissue grafts (rotational flap procedures and advanced flap procedures) and free soft tissue grafts (epithelialized, also called free gingival graft (FGG), and non-epithelialized, also called, connective tissue graft (CTG) or a combination of both. To bypass the drawback connected with autologous grafts harvesting, xenogenic collagen matrices (XCM)s and collagen-based matrices derived from porcine dermis (PDXCM)s have been introduced, as an alternative, in plastic peri-implant procedures. Aim: This review is aimed to evaluate and to critically analyze the available evidence on the effectiveness of XCMs and PDXCMs in soft tissue volume augmentation around dental implants. Moreover, a clinical case with a new soft tissue grafting procedure technique (Guided Soft Tissue Regeneration, GSTR) is presented. Material and Methods: An electronic search was performed on the MEDLINE database, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The electronic search provided a total of 133 articles. One hundred and twenty-eight not meeting the inclusion criteria were excluded. Seven articles of human randomized clinical trials were selected. A total number of 108 patients were treated with CTG, and 110 patients with XCM. Results: in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation procedures, XCMs seem an effective alternative to CTGs, associated with lower patient morbidity and lower operative times.

Is there any biomaterial substitute for peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification? A network meta-analysis of the appraisal literature

Evidence shows that an increased width and thickness of the keratinized mucosa favours peri-implant health. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the clinical effects of alternative biomaterials for peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification (PSPM) in patients with dental implants when compared to autologous tissue grafts. An electronic search without language or date limitations was performed in four databases and the grey literature for articles published until November 2020. The eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical outcomes of biomaterials for PSPM. A pairwise and network meta-analysis was conducted for each parameter to assess and compare the outcomes between the different treatment arms for the primary and secondary outcomes. A total of 11 RCTs were included in this review. The free gingival graft (FGG) showed the best clinical effect for increasing keratinized mucosa width (KMW). When compared in a network, the FGG demonstrated the best treatment ranking of probability results, followed by connective tissue graft (CTG), acellular dermal matrix (ADM), and xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM). For the parameters 'mucosa thickness' and 'participant satisfaction with aesthetics', the results were CTG > ADM > XCM and XCM > ADM > CTG, respectively. Autogenous tissue grafts (FGG/CTG) demonstrate the best results in increasing KMW and mucosa thickness when compared to the other biomaterials.

Outcome measures and methods of assessment of soft tissue augmentation interventions in the context of dental implant therapy: A systematic review of clinical studies published in the last 10 years

AIM

To identify and report outcome measures and methods of assessment on soft tissue augmentation interventions in the context of dental implant therapy reported in clinical studies published in the last 10 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The protocol of this PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021252214). A literature search was conducted to identify articles that met the pre-established eligibility criteria. Data of interest, with an emphasis on outcome measures, were extracted. For each outcome, specific methods and timing of assessment were described in detail. Following a critical qualitative analysis of the data, outcome measures were categorized. Primary outcomes were identified and frequency of reporting in the selected articles was calculated. Additionally, risk of bias assessments were performed for individual articles and primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-two articles, of which 39 reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 20 reported non-RCTs, and 33 reported case series studies, were selected. Outcome measures were categorized into either investigator-evaluated outcome measures (i.e., clinical, digital imaging, esthetic, histologic, biomarker, and safety) or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical outcomes were the most frequently reported type of outcome. Considering all categories, the most frequently reported primary outcomes were facial mucosa thickness assessed with clinical methods (22.83%), facial keratinized mucosa width assessed with clinical methods (19.57%), facial mucosal margin position / recession assessed with clinical methods (18.48%), facial mucosa thickness assessed with digital imaging methods (11.96%), facial soft tissue volume assessed with digital imaging methods (9.78%), and supracrestal tissue height assessed with clinical methods (9.78%). No distinguishable patterns of association between specific types or quality (level of bias) of clinical studies and the choice of primary outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSION

Clinical research on peri-implant soft tissue augmentation has progressively increased in the last 10 years. Although clinical outcome measures were the most frequently reported outcomes in the selected literature, trends in the field are indicative of a shift from traditional clinical assessment methods to the use of digital technologies. PROMs were generally underreported but should be considered an integral methodological component in future clinical studies.

Dimensional Changes in the Alveolus after a Combination of Immediate Postextraction Implant and Connective Grafting and/or Socket Shield Technique

Immediate implant placement protocols after dental extraction have enabled a reduction in surgical phases. This procedure has increased patient satisfaction and similar survival rates to late implant placement procedures. However, placing an implant immediately after dental extraction does not counteract the physiological remodeling of alveolar bone. For this reason, additional surgical techniques have been developed, such as the placement of a connective tissue graft (CTG) or the socket shield technique (SST). Dimensional changes in the peri-implant tissues were observed after placement of immediate implants following the extraction and CTG and/or SST. A total of 26 surgical interventions were carried out in which dimensional change variables of peri-implant tissues were analyzed. The preoperative state and immediate postoperative situation were compared with the situation after one year. Measurements were taken at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the gingival margin and analyzed in this CBCT radiological study (Planmeca Promax 3D). The implant platform was used as a reference point for the measurement of changes in alveolar crest height. One year after performing either of the two techniques (CTG and/or SST), a significant increase in the gingiva thickness and vestibular cortex occurred at 5 mm (0.65 ± 1.16 mm) and 7 mm (0.95 ± 1.45 mm) from the gingival margin. Additionally, an increase in thickness of palatal bone was registered at 3 mm (0.48 ± 0.90 mm). The graft placement group showed an increase in thickness of peri-implant tissue in the vestibular area after one year, although CTG and SST groups were clinically similar. The implementation of SST revealed promising results regarding the buccal thickness of hard and soft tissues after one year. A significant increase in vestibular cortical bone thickness, as well as the overall mucosa thickness and buccal bone at 3 mm from the gingival margin, was observed. A significant reduction in the distance from the bone crest to the platform was detected in both techniques. Both techniques (CTG and SST) are appropriate to provide sufficient volume to peri-implant tissues in the vestibular area of anterior maxillary implants. Some limitations were detected, such as the lack of an aesthetic analysis or small sample size, so results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies are necessary to further evaluate the long-term predictability of these techniques.

Does simultaneous soft tissue augmentation around immediate or delayed dental implant placement using sub-epithelial connective tissue graft provide better outcomes compared to other treatment options? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The clinical benefits of simultaneous implant placement and soft tissue augmentation using different treatment modalities are unclear. The current meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of simultaneous soft tissue augmentation using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) around immediate or delayed dental implant placement with other treatment modalities on the peri-implant tissue health and esthetic.

METHODS

Up to May 2021, four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar) were searched. Randomized control trials with follow-up >3 months, evaluating simultaneous implant placement (immediate or delayed) and soft tissue augmentation using SCTG compared with other treatment modalities were included. The predictor variables were SCTG versus no augmentation with/without guided bone regeneration (GBR) or other augmentation techniques (Acellular dermal matrix (ADM), Xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM). The outcome variables were buccal tissue thickness (BTT), mid-buccal gingival level (MGL), marginal bone loss (MBL), and pink esthetic scores (PES). Cumulative mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. SCTG along with immediate implant placement (IIP) or delayed implant placement (DIP) showed a statistically significant improvement in BTT (Fixed; MD, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51; 0.97), MGL (Fixed; MD, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.21; 0.80), PES (Fixed; MD, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.29; 1.29), and less MBL (Fixed; MD, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.14; -0.08) compared to no graft (P<0.05). A statistically insignificant differences in BTT (Random; MD, 0.62; 95% CI, -0.41; 1.65), MGL (Fixed; MD, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.23; 0.11), MBL (Fixed; MD, 0.36; 95% CI, -0.05; 0.77) and PES (Fixed; MD, 0.28; 95% CI, -0.10; 0.67) was observed when SCTG along with DIP was compared with no augmentation plus GBR. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed when comparing SCTG along with DIP with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) concerning BTT (MD:0.71, P = 0.18) and KMW (MD: 0.6, P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

There is a very low quality of evidence to provide recommendations on whether simultaneous dental implant placement (IIP or DIP) and soft tissue augmentation using SCTG is superior to no augmentation or is comparable to the other tissue augmentation materials in improving the quality and quantity of peri-implant tissues. Therefore, further, well-designed RCTs with larger sample sizes and long follow-up times are still needed.

Outcome measures and methods of assessment of soft tissue augmentation interventions in the context of dental implant therapy: A systematic review of clinical studies published in the last 10 years

AIM

To identify and report outcome measures and methods of assessment on soft tissue augmentation interventions in the context of dental implant therapy reported in clinical studies published in the last 10 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The protocol of this PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021252214). A literature search was conducted to identify articles that met the pre-established eligibility criteria. Data of interest, with an emphasis on outcome measures, were extracted. For each outcome, specific methods and timing of assessment were described in detail. Following a critical qualitative analysis of the data, outcome measures were categorized. Primary outcomes were identified and frequency of reporting in the selected articles was calculated. Additionally, risk of bias assessments were performed for individual articles and primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-two articles, of which 39 reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 20 reported non-RCTs, and 33 reported case series studies, were selected. Outcome measures were categorized into either investigator-evaluated outcome measures (i.e., clinical, digital imaging, esthetic, histologic, biomarker, and safety) or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical outcomes were the most frequently reported type of outcome. Considering all categories, the most frequently reported primary outcomes were facial mucosa thickness assessed with clinical methods (22.83%), facial keratinized mucosa width assessed with clinical methods (19.57%), facial mucosal margin position / recession assessed with clinical methods (18.48%), facial mucosa thickness assessed with digital imaging methods (11.96%), facial soft tissue volume assessed with digital imaging methods (9.78%), and supracrestal tissue height assessed with clinical methods (9.78%). No distinguishable patterns of association between specific types or quality (level of bias) of clinical studies and the choice of primary outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSION

Clinical research on peri-implant soft tissue augmentation has progressively increased in the last 10 years. Although clinical outcome measures were the most frequently reported outcomes in the selected literature, trends in the field are indicative of a shift from traditional clinical assessment methods to the use of digital technologies. PROMs were generally underreported but should be considered an integral methodological component in future clinical studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Hard and soft tissue augmentation of vertical ridge defects with the “hard top double membrane technique”: introduction of a new technique and a case report

<abstract> <p>Vertical ridge defects (VRD) of the jaws often require both bone and keratinized mucosa (KM) reconstruction. A new staged procedure is proposed to restore both hard and soft tissues in the VRD through a case report. A patient required the lower right second premolar and first molar rehabilitation. The first surgery aimed to restore the bone architecture through the use of a titanium reinforced dense-PTFE (TR-dPTFE) membrane, positioned and stabilized on top of tenting screws. This membrane didn't cover the whole defect, it just created an hard top that avoided the collapse of a collagen membrane that was placed over it. This resorbable membrane was stabilized with tacks and covered the whole defect, protecting a mixture of autogenous bone and porcine xenograft both lingually and buccally. The second surgery was performed after a 5 month healing time either to remove the tenting screws and the TR-dPTFE membrane, and to augment KM with a gingival graft harvested from the palate. Both regenerated hard and soft tissues were left to mature for 7 months before the third surgery. In this last stage implants insertion and healing abutments application were carried out in a straightforward way, since bone and KM had been previously restored. Two bone samples, harvested for histologic evaluation, stated a great amount of new bone formation. This new approach allowed inserting implants in matured and stable regenerated bone and augmented KM, avoiding the hard and soft tissue loss around implant neck that can affect the VRD treatments during healing.</p> </abstract>

Keratinized mucosa changes around one-stage implants: A prospective case series

BACKGROUND

The need of an adequate band of keratinized tissue (KT) to maintain periodontal health around teeth as well as around implants has been a debated topic over many years but still no conclusions have been drawn.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective case series evaluates the changes undergone by the keratinized mucosa (KM) and the soft tissue volume around non-submerged implants before the prosthetic rehabilitation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 40 patients were included. The primary outcome was to analyze the width of the KM at both buccal and lingual aspects compared to the pre-existing KT in the edentulous ridge only in mandibular (pre)molar area. The mucogingival line was marked with a surgical pen and an intra-oral scanner was used to take the impression of the implant area the day of the surgery (T0, baseline) and before the crown placement (T1, 3 months). Buccal soft tissue volume was measured at 1, 3, and 5 mm apical to the healing abutment position and a comparison between T0 and T1 was performed. Student t-test was used according to the distribution of the data (Shapiro-Wilk).

RESULTS

The mean KT width at baseline was 4.54 ± 1.31 mm at buccal side and 5.04 ± 1.88 mm at lingual side. After 3 months, the mean KM values were 3.15 ± 1.03 mm and 3.72 ± 1.56 mm at the buccal and lingual aspects, respectively. The differences, 30.6% of KM reduction buccally and 26.1% of reduction lingually, were statistically significant for both sides.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this investigation, it was observed that the KM width from the baseline to the 3 months follow up presented a significant dimensional change in both the buccal and lingual aspects, whereas buccal soft tissue volume showed an increase between baseline and follow up.

Patient-reported outcome measures following soft-tissue grafting at implant sites: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To review the available literature on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following soft tissue augmentation at implant sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive electronic and manual search was performed to identify clinical studies that involved soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and reported PROMs, including post-operative morbidity, painkillers intake, quality of life, aesthetics and satisfactions.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were included in the qualitative analysis. Autogenous grafts (free gingival graft and connective tissue graft), acellular dermal matrix and xenogeneic collagen matrix were utilized, either with a bilaminar- or an apically positioned flap approach. PROMs reported in the literature included perceived hardship of the procedure and pain during the surgery, post-operative morbidity, painkillers intake, number of days with discomfort, satisfaction, aesthetic evaluation, quality of life and willingness to undergo the treatment again. Most of the included studies showed similar PROMs between autogenous grafts and substitutes, in terms of post-operative morbidity, painkillers intake, quality of life, aesthetic assessment and satisfaction. Nevertheless, a trend towards lower post-operative discomfort was observed for graft substitutes. High scores for patient satisfaction and aesthetic evaluation were observed in all the interventions compared to non-grafted sites.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMs represent a crucial endpoint of clinical studies evaluating the outcomes of soft tissue grafts at implant sites. Most of the studies did not find significant differences in terms of patient morbidity and painkillers between autogenous grafts and substitutes. Soft tissue grafting can enhance patient satisfaction and aesthetic evaluation compared to non-grafted sites.

Linear and profilometric changes of the mucosa following soft tissue augmentation in the zone of aesthetic priority: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes of soft tissue augmentation, in terms of change in level and thickness of mid-buccal mucosa, at implants sites in the zone of the aesthetic priority.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched (last search on 1 June 2020). Inclusion criteria were studies reporting outcomes of different materials and timing of grafting in patients undergoing soft tissue augmentation at implant sites in the aesthetic zone with a follow-up of ≥1 year after implant placement. Outcome measures assessed included changes in level and thickness of mid-buccal mucosa, implant survival, peri-implant health and patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

Eighteen out of 2,185 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in vertical mid-buccal soft tissue change (0.34 mm, 95% CI: 0.13-0.56, p = .002) and mid-buccal mucosa thickness (0.66 mm, 95% CI: 0.35-0.97, p < .001) following immediate implant placement in favour of the use of a graft versus no graft. Mean difference in mid-buccal mucosa level following delayed implant placement (0.17 mm, 95% CI: 0.01-0.34, p = .042) was also in favour of the use of a graft versus no graft. With regard to mucosa thickness, the use of a graft was not in favour compared with no graft following delayed implant placement (0.22 mm, 95% CI: -0.04-0.47, p = .095). Observed changes remained stable in the medium term.

CONCLUSION

Soft tissue augmentation in the zone of the aesthetic priority results in less recession and a thicker mid-buccal mucosa following immediate implant placement and less recession in mid-buccal mucosa following delayed implant placement compared with no graft.

Histologic composition of marginal mucosal tissue augmented by a resorbable volume-stable collagen matrix in soft tissue thickening procedures in humans: a morphometric observational study

AIM

This study aims to examine the composition of lining and masticatory mucosa at the pre- and post-soft tissue augmentation procedures with a volume-stable cross-linking collagen matrix (VCMX) in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 12 patients, single implant sites were augmented with a VCMX. Biopsies were obtained including masticatory (MM) and lining (LM) mucosa before augmentation and at 12 weeks post-augmentation procedures. Rete pegs density (RPD), length (RPL), and blood vessel density (BVD) were histomorphometrically analyzed at both time points. Picrosirius red staining under polarized light microscopy was used to evaluate collagen fiber organization. The effects of time and tissue type were evaluated by ANOVA with repeated measures.

RESULTS

Both MM and LM areas demonstrated an increase in mean RPL following augmentation, 382.6 µm ± 95.1 vs. 290.5 µm ± 79.3 and 335.6 µm ± 94.2 vs. 292.9 µm ± 77.0, respectively (p < .05). There was a significant difference in the numbers of RP per 1 mm length (RPD) between the MM (9.2 ± 1.7) and LM (6.1 ± 2.8) mucosa but not between the pre- and post-VCMX augmentation time points. The mean BVD in the LM was greater than in the MM (5.5 ± 2.4 and 6.3 ± 2.4 vs. 3.4 ± 3.3 and 3.7 ± 1.8, respectively, p < .05) but not between time points. The collagen fiber arrangements pre- and post-augmentation were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Augmentation with VCMX did not alter the composition of lining and masticatory mucosa at implant sites.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A thick soft tissue phenotype around the implant neck is an important factor to maintain peri-implant health. A non-autogenous cross-linking collagen matrix is proposed as an alternate graft substitute in soft tissue augmentation procedures in order to improve implant soft tissue phenotype.

Clinical evaluations of free gingival grafting before implant placement to increase keratinized tissue width in molar regions: A retrospective case series

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the dimensional changes of the keratinized tissue width (KTW) in molar regions after augmentation by free gingival grafts (FGG) before implant placement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In seventeen patients, twenty implant sites in molar regions with KTW ≤3 mm at the buccal aspect received FGG 2 months before implant placement. KTW at the buccal aspect was measured before FGG (T0), immediately before implant placement (T1), at the time of impression taking for final prosthesis fabrication (T2), and at the end of the follow-up period after loading (T3, 12-48 months). Changes in KTW before and after FGG, as well as the alterations during the follow-up period after loading, were analyzed. Shapiro-Wilk test, paired Student's t test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for the data analysis at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

KTW at the buccal aspect of the alveolar ridge was observed with a significant gain of 5.9 ± 1.3 mm at T1 (p < .001). The shrinkage of KTW from T2 to T3 was 8.5%, which was limited but statistically significant (p = .008). KTW at the buccal aspect of implant restorations was 5.0 ± 1.5 mm at T3.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present study, our data suggest that using FGG to increase KTW in molar regions before implant placement had a predictable result. The buccal KTW had a limited reduction and was ≥3 mm with more than 12 months of follow-up after loading.

Efficacy of different surgical techniques for peri-implant tissue preservation in immediate implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Preserving peri-implant tissues after immediate implant placement (IIP), especially in aesthetic zones, is a topic of interest.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review investigated the effects of currently available surgical procedures for preserving peri-implant tissue or ensuring dimensional stability following immediate implant placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement's guidelines were followed, and articles were sought on the PubMed and Cochrane databases with no date restrictions. Only randomised clinical trials that evaluated changes in soft and hard tissues around immediately placed implants were included. Statistical analyses were performed, and the studies´ quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The agreement between reviewers was assessed based on Cohen's kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 11 were analysed in the meta-analysis (kappa = 0.814; almost perfect agreement). The use of connective tissue grafts resulted in a significantly greater improvement of the facial gingival level (MD = -0.51; 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.31; p = < .001), and the placement of bone grafts significantly reduced the horizontal resorption of the buccal bone (MD = -0.59; 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.39; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Connective tissue grafts and bone grafts positively influence tissue preservation around immediately placed implants. Neither the flapless technique nor palatal implant positioning resulted in significant improvements to any of the investigated parameters. Additional longitudinal studies are required.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis is useful for discerning the effects of soft tissue augmentation, bone grafting, the flapless technique, and palatal implant positioning on preserving peri-implant tissues after immediate implant placement.

Soft Tissue Injury in Preparation for Implants

Diagnosis and treatment planning are critical in preparation for implant placement. Adequate evaluation, preoperative imaging, and surgical planning minimize early and late-stage soft tissue injuries. Correct placement of dental implants can be challenging with several contributing factors such as lack of proper preoperative soft tissue evaluation and surgical experience in dealing with soft tissue incisions and flap reflection, resulting in injury and complications involving the soft tissues.

The Effect of Different Cleaning Protocols of Polymer-Based Prosthetic Materials on the Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts

Dental implant abutment and prosthetic materials, their surface treatment, and cleaning modalities are important factors for the formation of a peri-implant soft tissue seal and long-term stability of bone around the implant. This study aimed to investigate the influence of a polymeric material surface cleaning method on the surface roughness, water contact angle, and human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) proliferation. Polymeric materials tested: two types of milled polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA-Ker and PMMA-Bre), three-dimensionally (3D) printed polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA-3D), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). Titanium (Ti) and zirconia oxide ceramics (ZrO-HT) were used as positive controls. A conventional surface cleaning protocol (CCP) was compared to a multi-step research cleaning method (RCP). Application of the RCP method allowed to reduce S_a values in all groups from 0.14-0.28 µm to 0.08-0.17 µm (p < 0.05 in PMMA-Ker and PEEK groups). Moreover, the water contact angle increased in all groups from 74-91° to 83-101° (p < 0.05 in the PEKK group), except ZrO-HT-it was reduced from 98.7 ± 4.5° to 69.9 ± 6.4° (p < 0.05). CCP resulted in higher variability of HGF viability after 48 and 72 h. RCP application led to higher HGF viability in PMMA-3D and PEKK groups after 48 h, but lower for the PMMA-Ker group (p < 0.05). After 72 h, no significant differences in HGF viability between both cleaning methods were observed. It can be concluded that the cleaning method of the polymeric materials affected surface roughness, contact angle, and HGF viability at 48 h.

Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The peri-implant soft tissue phenotype (PSP) encompasses the keratinized mucosa width (KMW), mucosal thickness (MT), and supracrestal tissue height (STH). Numerous approaches to augment soft tissue volume around endosseous dental implants have been investigated. To what extent PSP modification is beneficial for peri-implant health has been subject of debate in the field of implant dentistry. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the evidence regarding the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures aimed at modifying the PSP and their impact on peri-implant health.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed to identify clinical studies that involved soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and reported findings on KMW, MT, and/or STH changes. The effect of the intervention on peri-implant health was also assessed. Selected articles were classified based on the general type of surgical approach to increase PSP, either bilaminar or an apically positioned flap (APF) technique. A network meta-analysis including only randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on PSP outcomes was conducted to assess and compare different techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 52 articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and 23 RCTs were included as part of the network meta-analysis. Sixteen RCTs reported the outcomes of PSP modification therapy with bilaminar techniques, whereas 7 involved the use of APF. The analysis showed that bilaminar techniques in combination with soft tissue grafts (connective tissue graft [CTG], collagen matrix [CM], and acellular dermal matrix [ADM]) resulted in a significant increase in MT compared to non-augmented sites. In particular, CTG and ADM were associated with higher MT gain as compared to CM and non-augmented sites. However, no significant differences in KMW were observed across different bilaminar techniques. PSP modification via a bilaminar approach utilizing either CTG or CM showed beneficial effects on marginal bone level stability. APF-based approaches in combination with free gingival graft (FGG), CTG, CM, or ADM showed a significant KMW gain compared to non-augmented sites. However, compared to APF alone, only FGG exhibited a significantly higher KMW gain. APF with any evaluated soft tissue graft was associated with with reduction of probing depth, soft tissue dehiscence and plaque index compared to non-augmented sites compared to non-augmented sites. The evidence regarding the effect of PSP modification via APF-based approaches on peri-implant marginal bone loss or preservation is inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilaminar approach involving CTG or ADM obtained the highest amount of MT gain, whereas APF in combination with FGG was the most effective technique for increasing KMW. KMW augmentation via APF was associated with a significant reduction in probing depth, soft tissue dehiscence and plaque index, regardless of the soft tissue grafting material employed, whereas bilaminar techniques with CTG or CM showed beneficial effects on marginal bone level stability.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

This comprehensive review of the 2018 dental literature is provided to inform busy dentists about progress in the profession. Developed by the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry, each author brings discipline-specific expertise to one of the 8 sections of the report including (1) prosthodontics; (2) periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; (3) implant dentistry; (4) dental materials and therapeutics; (5) occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; (6) sleep-related breathing disorders; (7) oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and (8) dental caries and cariology. The report targets important information that will likely influence day-to-day treatment decisions. Each review is not intended to stand alone but to update interested readers so that they may visit source materials if greater detail is desired. As the profession continues its march toward evidence-based clinical decision-making, an already voluminous library of potentially valuable dental literature continues to grow. It is the intention of this review and its authors to provide assistance in navigating the extensive dental literature published in 2018. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in the clinical management of patients moving forward.

Systematic review versus structured critical analysis

Objective: This analysis discusses common problems with systematic reviews (SRs) and presents a novel solution, the structured critical analysis (SCA) that can be incorporated into a SR or used as an alternative literature review design.Methods: A cross-sectional survey of current SRs related to interdisciplinary restorative dentistry was obtained by evaluating 100 current SRs for their self-reported methodological quality and its effect on scientific validity.Results: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocol (PRISMA) was used in 99/100 SRs, but only 8/100 reported a low risk of bias. High statistical heterogeneity precluding meta-analysis was found in 44/100 SRs. Only 94 paragraphs/100 SRs provided critical analysis.Discussion: Significant problems were found with current SRs that can compromise their reliability as the premier level of evidence for clinical science research. The reader must be aware of these deficiencies to correctly interpret the SR and cannot rely on the format alone.