1
|
Kemink KM, Pressey RL, Adams VM, Olimb SK, Healey AM, Liu B, Frerichs T, Renner R. Quantifying population-level conservation impacts for a perpetual conservation program on private land. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023; 345:118748. [PMID: 37666135 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
Area-based targets, such as percentages of regions protected, are popular metrics of success in the protection of nature. While easily quantified, these targets can be uninformative about the effectiveness of conservation interventions and should be complemented by program impact evaluations. However, most impact evaluations have examined the effect of protected areas on deforestation. Studies that have extended these evaluations to more dynamic systems or different outcomes are less common, largely due to data availability. In these cases, simulations might prove to be a valuable tool for gaining an understanding of the potential range of program effect sizes. Here, we employ simulations of wetland drainage to estimate the impact of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Small Wetlands Acquisition Program (SWAP) across a ten-year period in terms of wetland area, and breeding waterfowl and brood abundance in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and Montana. Using our simulation results, we estimate a plausible range of program impact for the SWAP as an avoided loss of between 0.00% and 0.02% of the carrying capacity for broods and breeding waterfowl from 2008-2017. Despite the low programmatic impact that these results suggest, the perpetual nature of SWAP governance provides promising potential for a higher cumulative conservation impact in the long term if future wetland drainage occurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaylan M Kemink
- Ducks Unlimited Inc, 2525 River Road, Bismarck 58503, ND, United States; College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville 48114, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Robert L Pressey
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville 48114, Queensland, Australia; Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Vanessa M Adams
- School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.
| | - Sarah K Olimb
- World Wildlife Fund Northern Great Plains Program, 13 S. Wilson Suite 1, Bozeman 59715, MT, United States.
| | - Aidan M Healey
- Ducks Unlimited Inc, 2525 River Road, Bismarck 58503, ND, United States.
| | - Boyan Liu
- Ducks Unlimited Inc, 2525 River Road, Bismarck 58503, ND, United States.
| | - Todd Frerichs
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Western SD WMD Complex, Sand Lake National Wildlife Refuge/Wetland Management District, 39650 Sand Lake Drive, Columbia 57433, SD, United States.
| | - Randy Renner
- Ducks Unlimited Inc, 2525 River Road, Bismarck 58503, ND, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fraser IM, Roberts DL, Brock M. The economics of species extinction: An economist's viewpoint. CAMBRIDGE PRISMS. EXTINCTION 2023; 1:e20. [PMID: 40078692 PMCID: PMC11895705 DOI: 10.1017/ext.2023.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
There is growing evidence to suggest that there is an increase in species extinction occurring globally. In this article, we briefly review the literature on the economics of species extinction, examining what is meant by extinction before explaining how economics has conceptualised this. The initial economics literature on species extinction focuses largely on renewable resources, in particular fisheries, but has subsequently evolved to cover many aspects of biodiversity across all physical scales, employing an increasing array of methodological tools. We also consider aspects of cultural and societal extinctions (e.g. local languages, local knowledge) and how this is positively correlated with loss of biodiversity, as well as an economist's outlook on the potential to re-capture value post-extinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain M. Fraser
- School of Economics and Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - David L. Roberts
- DICE and the School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Michael Brock
- School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Drechsler M, Wätzold F, Grimm V. The hitchhiker's guide to generic ecological-economic modelling of land-use-based biodiversity conservation policies. Ecol Modell 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
4
|
Zhou M. Dual Discounting in Renewable Resource Planning under Risk. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 69:353-366. [PMID: 34698922 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01549-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Renewable resource planning and management projects entail evaluating economic and ecological criteria in the long term. During the past decade or so, dual discounting--ecological criteria discounted at a smaller rate than that for economic criteria--has been proposed for such projects as an alternative to the prevailing single-discounting scheme, out of theoretical and empirical considerations. We focus on how to apply this principle in planning problems that involve a multitude of risk in the attendant biological-economic system. A stochastic dynamic programming framework is introduced which allows dual discounting rates and finds the optimal decisions (passively) adapting to changes in the system. Furthermore, we show how to evaluate the variances of the criteria in this framework. With a case study of managing public forestlands in the US Pacific Northwestern region for both timber return and habitat preservation for the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), we illustrate the impacts that the dual-discounting scheme has on the trade-off between conflicting management objectives, the optimal planning strategy, the temporal development of the portion of the forestlands suitable for owl habitats, as well as its steady-state expected value and standard deviation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mo Zhou
- Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715W. State St, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schöttker O, Santos MJ. Easement or public land? An economic analysis of different ownership modes for nature conservation measures in California. Conserv Lett 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Schöttker
- Chair of Environmental EconomicsBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus‐Senftenberg Cottbus Brandenburg Germany
| | - Maria João Santos
- University Research Priority Program in Global Change and Biodiversity and Department of GeographyUniversity of Zürich Zurich Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|