1
|
Suzuki Y, Tei M, Wakasugi M, Ohtsuka M, Hagihara K, Ikenaga M, Yanagimoto Y, Yamashita M, Shimizu J, Akamatsu H, Tomita N, Imamura H. Single-incision Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery: A Systemic Review, Meta-analysis, and Future Prospect. J Anus Rectum Colon 2024; 8:48-60. [PMID: 38689785 PMCID: PMC11056536 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2023-078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Although single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained some attention as a feasible alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) in colonic surgery, it became less prevalent than expected. Hence, we conducted this systematic review to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) with meta-analysis and discussion of the future prospect of SILS. The search was conducted from September to October 2023 using PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Articles on colorectal cancer comparing SILC with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) from all randomized controlled trials and comparative studies with 50 patients or more per arm were examined. The primary outcomes were the intra- and postoperative complication rates, and the secondary outcomes were the perioperative and oncological outcomes. The trends of the SILS number in Japan and the trends of the number of articles on SILS in PubMed were also reviewed. There were no significant differences in perioperative complication rates, operative factors, and oncological outcomes between SILC and MPLC, although heterogeneity was observed mainly in operative factors and the total length of the skin incision was significantly shorter in SILC. Therefore, SILC is technically and oncologically feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The case number of SILS was gradually increasing but the rate of SILS was decreasing in Japan. The number of articles on SILS was also decreasing. SILS has gained foothold to some extent but has plateaued. The emerging new robotic platform may reappraise the concept of SILS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yozo Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsuyoshi Tei
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaki Wakasugi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masahisa Ohtsuka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Hagihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masakazu Ikenaga
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshitomo Yanagimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masafumi Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Junzo Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Akamatsu
- Department of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Osaka Minato Central Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naohiro Tomita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- Cancer Treatment Center, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Imamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A Systematic Review of Comparing Single-incision Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy For Right Colon Diseases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 29:417-425. [PMID: 31592881 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (SILS) has been promoted in clinic since 2008, but a systematic review of comparing SILS and traditional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (TLS) with long-term follow-up is rare. Here, in this study, comparison of SILS and TLS with long-term follow-up was evaluated by a meta-analysis method. METHODS All studies about SILS and TLS for right hemicolectomy from 2010 to 2018 were searched from databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang. Operation index, recovery, and midterm follow-up data were evaluated by fixed-effects models, random-effects models, and Begg test. RESULTS We collected 22 studies with 2218 patients. SILS groups contained 1038 (46.7%) patients, and 1180 (53.3%) patients were observed in the TLS group. Patients' baseline data were similar in the 2 groups. Compared with TLS, SILS had shorter operation duration [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.61 to -0.08, P<0.001, χ=49.40], shorter hospitalization time (SMD: -0.27, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.16, P<0.001, χ=9.17), slightly less blood loss (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.36 to -0.10; P<0.001; χ=5.36), and smaller incision length (SMD: -2.19, 95% CI: -3.66 to -0.71, P<0.001; χ=316.1). No statistical differences were observed in other figures. CONCLUSION SILS is more convenient and has better efficacy than TLS and could provide a promising surgical approach for right colon diseases.
Collapse
|
3
|
Single-incision Laparoscopy Versus Multiport Laparoscopy for Colonic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2019; 268:740-746. [PMID: 30303873 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcome of single-port laparoscopy (SPL) and multiport laparoscopy (MPL) laparoscopy for colonic surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Benefits of SPL over MPL are yet to be demonstrated in large randomized trials. METHODS In this prospective, double-blinded, superiority trial, patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic resection for benign or malignant disease were randomly assigned to SPL or MPL (NCT01959087). Primary outcome was length of theoretical hospital stay (LHS). RESULTS One hundred twenty-eight patients were randomized and 125 analyzed: 62 SPL and 63 MPL, including 91 right (SPL: n = 44, 71%; MPL: n = 47, 75%) and 34 left (SPL: n = 18, 29%; MPL: n = 16, 25%) colectomies, performed for Crohn disease (n = 53, 42%), cancer (n = 36, 29%), diverticulitis (n = 21, 17%), or benign neoplasia (n = 15, 12%). Additional port insertion was required in 5 (8%) SPL patients and conversion to laparotomy occurred in 7 patients (SPL: n = 3, 5%; MPL: n = 4, 7%; P = 1.000). Total length of skin incision was significantly shorter in the SPL group [SPL: 56 ± 41 (range, 30-300) mm; MPL: 87 ± 40 (50-250) mm; P < 0.001]. Procedure duration, intraoperative complication rate, postoperative 30-day morbidity, postoperative pain, and time to first bowel movement were similar between the groups, leading to similar theoretical LHS (SPL: 6 ± 3 days; MPL: 6 ± 2; P = 0.298). At 6 months, quality of life was similar between groups, but patients from the SPL group were significantly more satisfied with their scar aspect than patients from the MPL group (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION SPL colectomy does not confer any additional benefit other than cosmetic result, as compared to MPL.
Collapse
|
4
|
Morales-Conde S, Peeters A, Meyer YM, Antoniou SA, Del Agua IA, Arezzo A, Arolfo S, Yehuda AB, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Dapri G, Yang T, Fransen S, Forgione A, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Mazzola M, Migliore M, Mittermair C, Mittermair D, Morandeira-Rivas A, Moreno-Sanz C, Morlacchi A, Nizri E, Nuijts M, Raakow J, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Szold A, Weiss H, Weiss M, Zorron R, Bouvy ND. European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:996-1019. [PMID: 30771069 PMCID: PMC6430755 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic surgery changed the management of numerous surgical conditions. It was associated with many advantages over open surgery, such as decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and excellent cosmesis. Since two decades single-incision endoscopic surgery (SIES) was introduced to the surgical community. SIES could possibly result in even better postoperative outcomes than multi-port laparoscopic surgery, especially concerning cosmetic outcomes and pain. However, the single-incision surgical procedure is associated with quite some challenges. Methods An expert panel of surgeons has been selected and invited to participate in the preparation of the material for a consensus meeting on the topic SIES, which was held during the EAES congress in Frankfurt, June 16, 2017. The material presented during the consensus meeting was based on evidence identified through a systematic search of literature according to a pre-specified protocol. Three main topics with respect to SIES have been identified by the panel: (1) General, (2) Organ specific, (3) New development. Within each of these topics, subcategories have been defined. Evidence was graded according to the Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Recommendations were made according to the GRADE criteria. Results In general, there is a lack of high level evidence and a lack of long-term follow-up in the field of single-incision endoscopic surgery. In selected patients, the single-incision approach seems to be safe and effective in terms of perioperative morbidity. Satisfaction with cosmesis has been established to be the main advantage of the single-incision approach. Less pain after single-incision approach compared to conventional laparoscopy seems to be considered an advantage, although it has not been consistently demonstrated across studies. Conclusions Considering the increased direct costs (devices, instruments and operating time) of the SIES procedure and the prolonged learning curve, wider acceptance of the procedure should be supported only after demonstration of clear benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvador Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Sugery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio", Sevilla, Spain
| | - Andrea Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yannick M Meyer
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Stavros A Antoniou
- Colorectal Department, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Isaías Alarcón Del Agua
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Sugery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio", Sevilla, Spain
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Simone Arolfo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Amir Ben Yehuda
- Surgery division, Assaf Harofe medical center, Zeriffin, Israel
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Tao Yang
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Sugery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio", Sevilla, Spain
| | - Sofie Fransen
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Ziekenhuis Roermond, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Shahin Hajibandeh
- Department of General Surgery, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, UK
| | | | - Marco Migliore
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Morandeira-Rivas
- Department of Surgery, "La Mancha Centro" General Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Carlos Moreno-Sanz
- Department of Surgery, "La Mancha Centro" General Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | | | - Eran Nizri
- Surgery division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Myrthe Nuijts
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jonas Raakow
- Center for Innovative Surgery- ZIC, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte/ Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Helmut Weiss
- SJOG Hospital - PMU Teaching Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Weiss
- SJOG Hospital - PMU Teaching Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ricardo Zorron
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Nicole D Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
No inflammatory benefit obtained by single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Today 2019; 49:621-628. [PMID: 30739170 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01777-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the perioperative inflammatory mediators in a right hemicolectomy performed with single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and traditional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS) to compare the postoperative inflammatory response and feasibility of SILS with that of MLS. METHODS In this retrospective study, we enrolled 56 consecutive colorectal cancer patients who underwent right hemicolectomy prospectively. Twenty patients underwent SILS, and 36 underwent MLS. The preoperative and postoperative levels of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) as well as the number of platelet cells were measured in all patients. The operation duration, number of harvested lymph nodes, length of the resected bowel, blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS Neither SILS nor MLS had any conversion cases. The operation duration was longer for MLS than for SILS. Blood loss tended to be lower among patients who underwent SILS than among those who underwent MLS. However, the number of harvested LNs was significantly lower with SILS than with MLS. In both pre- and postoperative blood examinations, there was no marked difference in inflammatory mediators between MLS and SILS. CONCLUSION There was no systemic inflammatory advantage associated with SILS compared with MLS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Yamamoto M, Asakuma M, Tanaka K, Masubuchi S, Ishii M, Osumi W, Hamamoto H, Okuda J, Uchiyama K. Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3616-3622. [PMID: 30643984 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06647-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has become an acceptable treatment for right-sided colon cancer. Most centers use multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy extracorporeally (MRHE), whereas single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy intracorporeally (SRHI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare these two techniques using propensity score matching analysis. METHODS We analyzed the data from 111 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy between December 2015 and December 2016. The propensity score was calculated according to age, gender, body mass index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous abdominal surgery, and D3 lymph node dissection. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and postoperative analgesic use was an outcome measure. RESULTS The length of skin incision in SRHI was significantly shorter than in MRHE [3 (3.5-6) versus 4 (3-6) cm, respectively; P = 0.007]. The VAS score on day 1 and day 2 after surgery was significantly less in SRHI than in MRHE [30 (10-50) versus 50 (20-69) on day 1, P = 0.037; 10 (0-50) versus 30 (0-70) on day 2, P = 0.029]. Significantly fewer patients required analgesia after SRHI on day 1 and day 2 after surgery [1 (0-3) versus 2 (0-4) on day 1, P = 0.024; 1 (0-2) versus 1 (0-4) on day 2, P = 0.035]. There were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes removed, and postoperative course between groups. CONCLUSIONS SRHI appears to be safe and technically feasible. Moreover, SRHI reduces the length of the skin incision and postoperative pain compared with MRHE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Yamamoto
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Asakuma
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Keitaro Tanaka
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Masubuchi
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Ishii
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Wataru Osumi
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Hiroki Hamamoto
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Junji Okuda
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Kazuhisa Uchiyama
- Departments of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dong B, Luo Z, Lu J, Yang Y, Song Y, Cao J, Li W. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right colectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 55:31-38. [PMID: 29777881 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has gained widespread attention because of its potential benefits such as less skin incision and faster recovery. Up to now, only one meta-analysis (performed in 2013; including 9 studies, a total of 585 cases) compared single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy (SILRC) with conventional laparoscopic right colectomy (CLRC). An updated meta-analysis was undertaken to explore more convinced comparative findings between SILRC and CLRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS The search for studies that compared SILRC with CLRC was done on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 17 studies (including 1778 cases) were identified, the data of appointed outcomes were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS Patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index and previous abdominal operation) did not differ significantly. No significant differences were found between SILRC and CLRC in operative time, conversion, reoperation, perioperative complications, postoperative mortality, and 30-days readmission. Pathological outcomes, including lymph nodes harvested, proximal resection margin, and distal resection margin, were similar. SILRC showed less estimated blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -15.67 ml; 95% confidence interval [CI], -24.36 to -6.98; p = 0.0004), less skin incisions (WMD: -1.56 cm; 95%CI, -2.63 to -0.49; p = 0.004) and shorter hospital stay (WMD: -0.73d; 95%CI, -1.04 to -0.41; p < 0.00001), without publication bias. CONCLUSION SILRC may provide a safe and feasible alternative to CLRC with similar short-term outcomes and aesthetic advantage of less skin incision. Well-designed randomized controlled trials, involving large cases and carrying long-term outcomes, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boye Dong
- Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zuyang Luo
- Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiabao Lu
- Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Nanshan College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yixian Song
- Nanshan College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Cao
- Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Wanglin Li
- Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gibor U, Perry Z, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Kirshtein B. Single Port and Conventional Laparoscopy in Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Two Techniques. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017; 28:65-70. [PMID: 28976805 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was introduced to further the enhanced outcome of conventional multiport laparoscopy (CML). We compared their short- and long-term outcomes in colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery during 3-year period. Patients' data, surgery outcomes, and oncological results were compared. RESULTS Sixty-one patients (33 male, 28 female), mean age 67.4 years, underwent laparoscopic colonic resections: 28 SILS and 33 CML. Twenty-three (37.7%) patients had previous abdominal surgery. There were 19 (31.2%) right, 9 (14.7%) left, and 2 (3.3%) total colectomies, 16 (26.2%) sigmoidectomies, 13 (21.3%) anterior and 2 (3.3%) abdominoperineal resections. Colonic malignancy was a main indication for the surgery in 51 (83.6%) patients. Mean surgery time and postoperative stay were 92.0 minutes and 9 days, respectively. Pathological examination revealed stage I colon cancer in 16 (32%), stage II in 22 (44%), stage III in 10 (20%), and stage IV in 2 (4%) patients. Mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 19 ± 13.5. No differences were found between groups in demographic data, type of surgery, surgery time and hospital stay, pathological results and tumor staging, and disease-free and overall survivals. In the SILS group, placement of additional trocar was required in 7 (25%) and conversion in 3 (10.7%) cases compared with 1 (3%) case of conversion to formal laparotomy in the CML group. Overall postoperative morbidity was 16.4%. There was no mortality in both the groups. During the study period, 3 patients from the CML group had cancer recurrence. CONCLUSIONS SILS is a feasible and safe technique compared with CML in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udit Gibor
- Department of Surgery A, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Zvi Perry
- Department of Surgery A, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Sergey Domchik
- Department of Surgery A, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Solly Mizrahi
- Department of Surgery A, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Boris Kirshtein
- Department of Surgery A, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Carvajal F. Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2017; 214:127-140. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2016] [Revised: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
10
|
Brockhaus AC, Sauerland S, Saad S. Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence. BMC Surg 2016; 16:71. [PMID: 27756272 PMCID: PMC5070079 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-016-0187-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) requires only one umbilical port site and (depending on technique) a specimen extraction site. The aim of this study was the assessment of the available evidence for the comparison of SILC to conventional multi-port laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) in adult patients, in whom elective colectomy is indicated because of malignant or benign disease. First, previous meta-analyses on this topic were assessed. Secondly, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, was performed. METHODS Electronic literature searches (CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE; up to March 2016) were performed. Additionally, we searched clinical trials registries and abstracts from surgical society meetings. For meta-analysis, risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated and pooled. The quality of previous meta-analyses was evaluated against established criteria (AMSTAR) and their reported results were investigated for consistency. RESULTS We identified 6 previous meta-analyses of mostly low methodological quality (AMSTAR total score: 2 - 5 out of 11 items). To fill the evidence gaps, all these meta-analyses had included non-randomised studies, but usually without assessing their risk of bias. In our systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials exclusively, we included two randomised controlled trials with a total of 82 colorectal cancer patients. There was insufficient evidence to clarify whether SILC leads to less local complications (RR = 0.52, 95 % CI 0.14 - 1.94) or lower mortality (1 death per treatment group). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the SILC group (MD = -1.20 days, 95 % CI -1.95 to -0.44). One of the two studies found postoperative pain intensity to be lower at the first day. We also identified 7 ongoing trials with a total sample size of over 1000 patients. CONCLUSION The currently available study results are too sparse to detect (or rule out) relevant differences between SILC and MLC. The quality of the current evidence is low, and the additional analysis of non-randomised data attempts, but does not solve this problem. SILC should still be considered as an experimental procedure, since the evidence of well-designed randomised controlled trials is too sparse to allow any recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Catharina Brockhaus
- Department of Medical Biometry, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany. .,Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Stefan Sauerland
- Department of Non-Drug Interventions, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Saad
- Department of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Hospital University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shrestha B. Minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Current perspectives. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2016; 7:214-216. [PMID: 27158536 PMCID: PMC4848243 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Revised: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The surgical management of complicated and recurrent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), has remained a challenge. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), in the form of laparoscopic resections, single port approach and robotic-assisted dissections in the management of IBD, have been examined in several prospective studies. All of them have shown advantages over open surgery in terms of reduction of physical trauma of surgery, recovery time, better cosmetic outcomes and shorter hospitalization. However, it is important to appreciate that not all patients with IBD are suitable for MIS, so a combination of both open and MIS should be adopted to achieve optimum outcomes. A review on this subject performed by Neumann et al in this issue of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics have provided evidence in support of the contemporary practice of MIS in the management of IBD and the accompanying commentary further critically evaluates their application in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been described in adults with Crohn's disease, but its use in pediatric Crohn's patients has been limited. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with SILS in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS A retrospective review was performed for patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease who underwent small bowel resection or ileocecectomy at a freestanding children's hospital from 2006 to 2014. Data collected included demographic data, interval from diagnosis to surgery, operative time, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Analysis identified 19 patients who underwent open surgery (OS) and 41 patients who underwent SILS. One patient (2.4 %) within the SILS group required conversion to OS. Demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts. The most common indication for surgery was stricture/obstruction (SILS 70.7 % vs. OS 68.4 %, p = 0.86), and ileocecectomy was the most common primary procedure performed (SILS 90.2 % vs. OS 100 % OS). Operative times were longer for SILS (135 ± 50 vs. 105 ± 37 min, p = 0.02). However, when the last 20 SILS cases were compared to all OS cases, the difference was no longer statistically significant (SILS 123.3 ± 34.2 vs. OS 105 ± 36.5, p = 0.12). No difference was noted in postoperative length of stay (SILS 6.5 ± 2.2 days vs. OS 7.4 ± 2.2 days, p = 0.16) or overall complication rate (SILS 24.4 % vs. OS 26.3 %, p = 0.16). CONCLUSION SILS ileocecectomy is feasible in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease, achieving outcomes similar to OS. As experience increased, operative times also became comparable.
Collapse
|
13
|
Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic colectomy and multiport laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:4697-4720. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
14
|
Apostolou KG, Orfanos SV, Papalois AE, Felekouras ES, Zografos GC, Liakakos T. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Right Hemi-Colectomy: a Systematic Review. Indian J Surg 2015; 77:301-12. [PMID: 26702238 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1282-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
As surgeons became more adept with laparoscopic colon surgery, other less invasive procedures, such as single-incision laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy (SIL-RH), have been applied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of SIL-RH as well as its intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for right-sided colon diseases. A detailed search in PubMed for citations that included SIL-RH from 2000 to 2014 revealed 21 studies fulfilling the criteria of the present review. A total of 684 patients were analyzed. Of the patients, 50.2 % were men. Mean patient age was 64.8 years. Of the patients, 36.1 % had already undergone an abdominal operation before the performance of SIL-RH, while 69 % of the patients underwent SIL-RH for colon cancer. Relatively low rates of overall morbidity (15 %) and mortality (0.75 %) were reported in the included studies. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) was 5.5 days. Bowel motility return had a mean value of 2.8 days. Mean number of harvested lymph nodes (LN) was 19.2 LN. All resection margins were tumor-free. SIL-RH was a safe alternative to multiport laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy (ML-RH) in terms of morbidity and mortality, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, LOS, as well as oncological radicalness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K G Apostolou
- 1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, Athens School of Medicine, University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - S V Orfanos
- 1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, Athens School of Medicine, University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - A E Papalois
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, Hippocration Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - E S Felekouras
- 1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, Athens School of Medicine, University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - G C Zografos
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, Hippocration Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - T Liakakos
- 1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Athens Laiko, Athens School of Medicine, University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Luján JA, Soriano MT, Abrisqueta J, Pérez D, Parrilla P. Colectomía mediante puerto único vs colectomía mediante laparoscopia multipuerto. Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de más de 2.800 procedimientos. Cir Esp 2015; 93:307-19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Revised: 11/02/2014] [Accepted: 11/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
16
|
Markar SR, Wiggins T, Penna M, Paraskeva P. Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery-systematic review and pooled analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18:2214-27. [PMID: 25217093 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2654-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this pooled analysis is to determine the effect of single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery (SILC) on short-term clinical and oncological outcomes compared with conventional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery (CLC). METHODS An electronic search of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed. Weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for the effect size of SILC on continuous variables and pooled odds ratios (POR) were calculated for discrete variables. RESULTS No significant differences between the groups were noted for mortality or morbidity including anastomotic leak, reoperation, pneumonia, wound infection, port-site hernia, and operative time. The benefits of a SILC approach included reduction in time to return of bowel function (WMD = -1.11 days; 95 % C.I. -2.11 to -0.13; P = 0.03), and length of hospital stay (WMD = -1.9 days; 95 % C.I. -2.73 to -1.07; P < 0.0001). Oncological surgical quality was also shown for SILC for the treatment of colorectal cancer with a similar average lymph node harvest, proximal and distal resection margin length compared to CLC. CONCLUSIONS SILC can be performed safely by experienced laparoscopic surgeons with similar short-term clinical and oncological outcomes to CLC. SILC may further enhance some of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with a reduction in blood loss and length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz R Markar
- Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, UK,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|