Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for the treatment of fistula-in-ano: experience of a tertiary care centre in South India

Is the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure truly a sphincter preserving procedure for anal fistula? A scoping review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure has garnered popularity with its success rates and purported sphincter-continence preservation. However, there remains a paucity in the literature on the objective evaluation of sphincter integrity and fecal continence after the LIFT procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The present study undertakes a scoping review to systematically explore and map the published literature, to evaluate the sufficiency of data on the impact on continence in patients after the LIFT procedure.

DESIGN

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASe, CINAHL was performed from January 2007 to April 2020 and 597 publications were identified. Forty-two satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We performed a scoping review in accordance to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 3 (7.1%) of publications were randomized controlled trials, of which just 1 (2.4%) measured incontinence as a primary outcome. Continence was measured both pre- and post-LIFT in 30 (71.4%), of which 19 (45.2%) had a fixed protocol for continence assessment, which was heterogeneous between the studies. Continence was assessed using subjective scoring systems in 27 (64.3%) and objective measurement was performed in just 6 (14.3%). No studies performed post-operative anatomical assessment of the anal sphincter complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term continence in post-LIFT patients is not supported with adequately powered prospective longitudinal trials using rigorously protocoled pre- and post-operative assessment of continence. Future research that focuses on a combination of objective assessment using anal manometry as well as anatomical assessment of the sphincter complex on top of subjective evaluation is needed before we can be certain if LIFT is indeed a sphincter and continence preserving technique.

Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract as an Emergency Treatment for Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula

Introduction

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a sphincter-preserving procedure for treating anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin. Our prospective study aimed to determine the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing LIFT in emergency and elective settings.

Methods

This was a single-centre prospective observational study of the LIFT procedure for the treatment of anal fistulas. The differences in the 6-month postoperative outcomes between the emergency and elective procedures were analysed, including the healing rate, healing time, recurrence rate, recurrence time, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

Results

Twenty-two patients were recruited for this study: 11 patients underwent LIFT as an emergency procedure (EM-LIFT), while the others underwent LIFT as an elective procedure (EL-LIFT). The healing rate for the EM-LIFT group was 90.9% (n = 10), with a median healing time of 2 months (range 0.5-4). For the EL-LIFT group, the healing rate was 100% (n = 11), with the same median healing time of 2 months (range 0.5-4). Two of the patients in the EM-LIFT group developed recurrence, with a median recurrence time of 5 months (range 4-6) and three developed recurrence in the EL-LIFT group, with the same median recurrence time of 5 months (range 4-6). There were minor postoperative complications of pain and subcutaneous infection, with no faecal incontinence. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion

EM-LIFT is a feasible and safe primary procedure for active cryptoglandular-type anal fistulas.

Management of Complex Fistula-in-ano by Interception of Fistula Track with Application of Ksharasutra (IFTAK): A Novel Technique

Objective Despite all the technological advances, successful management of complex fistula-in-ano is still a challenge due to recurrence and incontinence. The present study evaluates the outcomes of a novel technique, Interception of Fistula Track with Application of Ksharasutra (IFTAK) in terms of success rate and degree of incontinence.

Methods In the present prospective study, 300 patients with complex fistula-in-ano were treated by the IFTAK technique, whose surgical steps include: incision at the anterior or posterior midline perianal area, identification and interception of the fistulous track at the level of the external sphincter, rerouting the track (and extensions) at the site of interception, and application of a ksharasutra (medicated seton) in the proximal track (from the site of interception to the internal opening) that is laid open gradually, with the resulting wound healing with minimum scarring. The distal track is allowed to heal spontaneously.

Results There were 227 trans-sphincteric and 73 intersphincteric varieties of fistula with supralevator extension in 23 cases, of which 130 were recurrent fistulas, 29 had horseshoe track, while 25 had blind fistula with no cutaneous opening. The mean duration of the ksharasutra application was 8.11 ± 3.86 weeks with an overall success rate of 93.33% at the 1-year follow-up. A total of 3.67% of the cases reported with a mild impairment of continence on the Wexner incontinence scoring system. Pre- and postoperative anal manometry evaluation showed minimal reduction in median basal and squeeze pressures.

Conclusion The IFTAK technique is a minimally invasive, daycare surgical procedure for the management of complex fistula-in-ano with low recurrence and minimal sphincter damage.

LIFT: a feasible option for primary and recurrent fistulas

BACKGROUND

The development of a surgical solution for anal fistulas with minimal recurrence and morbidity remains a challenge. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), however, is a sphincter sparing technique that provides complete resolution of the transsphincteric fistula as well as minimizing recurrence and fecal incontinence. Our goal is to evaluate the efficacy of fistula tract ligation for primary and recurrent fistulas.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center case study was conducted from data between 2015 and 2019 in a large district hospital in Antwerp, Belgium. Patients who underwent LIFT were included. Demographic patient data as well as primary outcome during the follow-up period were collected. A systematic literature review and analysis was conducted with terms [ANAL FISTULA] [TREATMENT] [LIFT] [LIGATION OF INTERSPHINCTERIC FISTULA]. Primary healing and recurrence associated with surgical modifications were investigated.

RESULTS

4 out of 25 patients presented with early failure (84% primary success rate) after a median follow-up period of 7 months. The median time until recurrence was 105 days. The success rate after a redo ligation was 100%. Twenty-eight studies were included for review and divided into three groups depending on the technical variation of the used technique. The success rate was 74.2% for the LIFT group, 72.9% in the LIFT + group, and 77.5% in the mLIFT group p = .92.

CONCLUSION

LIFT is a feasible treatment option for primary and recurrent fistulas, with excellent success rates where fistula characteristics rather than chosen technique dictate the surgical outcome.

LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano. Are outcomes good enough? A systematic review and meta-analysisis of observational studies

INTRODUCTION

Efficacy of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano remains under debate. However, there is scarcity of quality evidence analysing this issue. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of LIFT surgery in patients with posterior anal fistula.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy of LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula. MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar data sources were searched for key-words (MeSH terms): "LIFT" OR "Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract" AND "posterior anal fistula" OR "posterior fistula-in-ano". Original, observational and experimental, non-language restriction studies published from January 2000 to March 2020 and reporting outcomes on LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula were reviewed. Quality and potential biases were assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale, following AHRQ recommendations. Additional sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation (Beg and Egger's tets) were performed.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in recurrence rate among patients undergoing LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano in contrast to other locations (OR 1.36 [IC 95% 0.60-3.07]; p=.46). I² test value was 77%, expressing a fair heterogeneity among included studies. The weighed median for overall recurrence was 37.8% (RI 18.3-47.7%); with a weighed median of 47.1% (RI 30.7 - 63.7%) and 36.3% (RI 15.8-51.3%) (p=.436) respectively for recurrence after LIFT for posterior fistula and fistula in other locations. There was not clear evidence about the sample size ("n") of included studies nor the disparities in quality assessment of those, could justify the observed heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that there are no clear data in the literature for not performing the LIFT procedure in posteriorly located fistulas.

A prospective evaluation of the outcome of submucosal ligation of fistula tract

AIM

Fistula-in-ano (FIA) is an anomalous passage between perianal skin and the anal canal or the rectum that presents many management difficulties. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) was introduced as a cost-effective sphincter-saving procedure with a reported success rate of 94.4%. Unfortunately, this procedure is technically challenging, and recently submucosal ligation of fistula tract (SLOFT), a simplification of LIFT, was proposed. Our aim was to assess the SLOFT technique over a longer follow-up period to determine its effectiveness.

METHOD

A prospective observational study was performed in 47 patients with FIA treated by SLOFT from September 2017 to February 2019.

RESULTS

There were 47 patients, of whom 33(70.2%) were men. The median age was 39 years (range 30-50 years). All the patients had primary FIA of cryptoglandular origin. The patients were followed up for 1 year and were postoperatively assessed at 2, 4, 12 and 24 weeks and 1 year. The median body mass index was 27.3 kg/m² (range 24.3-29.4 kg/m² ) and the median duration of surgery was 15 min (range 13-20 min). Most (83.0%) of the fistulas were trans-sphincteric. The success rates at the end of 24 weeks and 1 year were 87.2% and 80.9%, respectively. No postoperative incontinence was recorded.

CONCLUSION

In our series the success rate of SLOFT was 80.9%. There were no sphincter-related complications. Repeat SLOFT was feasible for cases of recurrence. Therefore, SLOFT should be considered an alternative sphincter-saving procedure to LIFT for the management of FIA.

Video-Assisted Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Complex Anal Fistula: Technique and Preliminary Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sphincter-preserving operations have been increasingly used for treating anal fistula. However, their success rates remain modest in complex anal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report outcomes of video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (a procedure combining video-assisted anal fistula treatment and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract) for treating complex anal fistulas and to compare its results with conventional ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract.

DESIGN

A review of prospectively collected data from October 2014 to December 2017 was performed.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Thailand.

PATIENTS

All patients with primary or recurrent complex anal fistulas undergoing video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract were included. Patients with anal fistula related to malignancy, Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, or acute abscess were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Healing as defined by an absence of fistula or drainage from an external opening and complete epithelialization of the external opening were measured.

RESULTS

This study included 103 patients with a median age of 47 years. The primary healing rate was 84.5% at a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 15-38 mo). Primary healing rates of anterior high transsphincteric fistula, semi-horseshoe fistula, and horseshoe fistula were 88% (44 of 50 cases), 77% (30 of 39 cases), and 93% (13 of 14 cases). Median time to healing was 4 weeks (range, 4-8 wk). Accordingly, the overall failure rate was 15.5%. None reported worse fecal incontinence postoperatively. Video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract had a higher rate of primary healing for complex anal fistula than ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (84.5% vs 63.4%; p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract for complex anal fistulas are quite good. This technique has the potential to become another viable option of sphincter-preserving operation for complex anal fistulas. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B373. LIGADURA ASISTIDA POR VIDEO DEL TRACTO DE LA FÍSTULA INTERESFINTÉRICA PARA LA FÍSTULA ANAL COMPLEJA: TÉCNICA Y RESULTADOS PRELIMINARIES: Las operaciones de preservación del esfínter se han utilizado cada vez más para tratar la fístula anal. Sin embargo, sus tasas de éxito siguen siendo modestas en las fístulas anales complejas.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo informar los resultados de la ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica (un procedimiento que combina el tratamiento de la fístula anal asistida por video y la ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica) para el tratamiento de las fístulas anales complejas y comparar sus resultados con la ligadura convencional de la fístula interesfintérica tracto.Se realizó una revisión de los datos recolectados prospectivamente desde Octubre de 2014 hasta Diciembre de 2017.El estudio se realizó en un gran hospital terciario en Tailandia.Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con fístulas anales complejas primarias o recurrentes sometidas a ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica. Se excluyeron los pacientes con fístula anal relacionada con malignidad, enfermedad de Crohn, tuberculosis o absceso agudo.Curación definida por la ausencia de fístula o drenaje de la abertura externa y la epitelización completa de la abertura externa.Este estudio incluyó 103 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 47 años. La tasa de curación primaria fue del 84,5% con una mediana de seguimiento de 28 meses (rango 15-38). La tasa de curación primaria de la fístula transesfintérica alta anterior, la fístula semi-herradura y la fístula de herradura fue del 88% (44 de 50 casos), 77% (30 de 39 casos) y 93% (13 de 14 casos), respectivamente. El tiempo mediano hasta la curación fue de 4 semanas (rango 4-8). En consecuencia, la tasa de fracaso general fue del 15,5%. Ninguno informó peor incontinencia fecal después de la operación. La ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica tuvo una mayor tasa de curación primaria para la fístula anal compleja que la ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica (84.5% vs 63.4%; p <0.001).Este estudio está limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra.Los resultados de la ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica para fístulas anales complejas son bastante buenos. Esta técnica tiene el potencial de convertirse en otra opción viable de operación de preservación del esfínter para fístulas anales complejas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B373. (Traducción-Dr Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic anal fistula. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. Surgery is the main treatment and several procedures have been developed, but the risks of recurrence and of impairment of continence still seem to be an unresolved issue. This statement reviews the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in treatment of anal fistula: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of the predictors of failure

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract has gained increasing popularity as a sphincter-sparing technique for complex anal fistula. The present review aimed to investigate the pooled success and complication rates of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract in the published literature and to explore the risk factors for failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant literature search was conducted. Electronic databases were searched in the period of January 2007 through April 2019 for studies that assessed the outcome of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. The main outcomes of the review were the pooled success and complication rates of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, predictors of failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, operation time, hospital stay, and how failures were managed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies comprising 1,378 patients (996 male) were included in this review. The mean age of patients was 42.3 ± 4.2 years. The weighted mean rate of success was 76.5%. The median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. The weighted mean complication rate was 13.9%. The most common complication was wound dehiscence. Fecal incontinence was recorded in 1.4% of patients. Factors that were statistically significantly associated with failure after the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were horseshoe fistulas, fistulas associated with Crohn's disease, and those with a history of previous fistula surgery.

CONCLUSION

The pooled success and complication rates of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were about 76% and 14%, respectively. Horseshoe fistulas, Crohn's disease, and previous fistula surgery were identified as predictors for failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure.

Risk Factors for Recurrence after anal fistula surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite a burgeoning literature during the last two decades regarding perioperative risk management of anal fistula, little is known about its risk factors that influence postoperative recurrence. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize and assess the credibility of evidence of potential risk factors for anal fistula recurrence (AFR) after surgery.

METHODS

Pubmed and EMBASE without language restriction were searched from inception to April 2018 that reported risk factors which predisposed recurrence after anal fistula surgery. We excluded studies that involved patients with anal fistula associated with Crohn's disease. MOOSE guidelines were followed when this meta-analysis was performed. We used random-effects models to pool relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Evidence from observational studies was graded into high-quality (Class I), moderate-quality (Class II/III) and low-quality (Class IV) based on Egger's P value, total sample size and between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 3514 citations screened, 20 unique observational studies comprising 6168 patients were involved in data synthesis. High-quality evidence showed that AFR was associated with high transsphincteric fistula (RR, 4.77; 95% CI, 3.83 to 5.95), internal opening unidentified (RR, 8.54; 95% CI, 5.29 to 13.80), and horseshoe extensions (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.59). Moderate-quality evidence suggested an association with prior anal surgery (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23), seton placement surgery (RR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.10 to 8.06), and multiple fistula tract (RR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.46 to 15.51). High-quality evidence demonstrated no significant association with gender or smoking; moderate-quality evidence also suggested no association with age, tertiary referral, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus, obesity, preoperative seton drainage, high internal opening, postoperative drainage, mucosal advancement flap surgery, supralevator extensions, location or type of anal fistula.

CONCLUSION

Several patient, surgery and fistula-related factors are significantly associated with postoperative AFR. These findings strengthen clinical awareness of early warning to identify patients with high-risk disease recurrence for AFR.

Perianal fistulas and the lift procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treatment

Background

Treatment of a perianal fistula is difficult due to the risk of fecal incontinence and recurrence. The ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) procedure is a sphincter-saving procedure associated with success rates ranging from 57 to 94%. The aim of our study was to find predictors for a favorable outcome of the LIFT procedure, evaluation of postoperative fecal incontinence, quality of life, and subsequent treatment with long-term follow-up.

Methods

This study was performed in patients who underwent LIFT between 2013 and 2015 at our institution. Their medical data were retrieved from the electronic patient files. The fistula characteristics were described by physical examination, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound, and perioperative evaluation. Recurrence rate, postoperative fecal incontinence, and quality of life were assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM). Thirty-two months later, long-term follow-up including subsequent procedures was evaluated.

Results

Forty-five patients [17 men, mean age 40 years (range 24–67 years)] were included. In 41 (84%) patients, the fistula was classified as complex; 32 (71%) were referrals with a history of previous fistula surgery. The initial success rate was 18 (40%). Only the height of the internal fistula opening (≥ 15 mm p < 0.03) was associated with recurrence. The LIFT procedure did not affect the occurrence of fecal incontinence or soiling. Recurrence showed a trend with a lower PROM (p = 0.07). Twenty-four months later, further surgery leads to cure in 34 (75%), asymptomatic fistulas in 7 (16%), and persisting active fistulas in 4 (9%) patients.

Conclusions

Initial LIFT had a success rate of 40% and with subsequent surgical treatment 75%. Recurrence after LIFT is related to the height of the internal fistula opening and is associated with diminished quality of life. Continence was not affected by initial LIFT.

Long-Term Outcomes of Ligation of the Inter-Sphincteric Fistula Tract Plus Bioprosthetic Anal Fistula Plug (LIFT-Plug) in the Treatment of Trans-Sphincteric Perianal Fistula

BACKGROUND The ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract plus bioprosthetic anal fistula plug (LIFT-plug) is a new procedure in the treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas. The aim of this study was to evaluate its long-term outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinical data of 78 patients with trans-sphincteric perianal fistula who were managed by the LIFT-plug technique between March 2014 to October 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The operation time, healing rate, postoperative complications, recurrences, and length of stay were reviewed. RESULTS No serious complications occurred during the operation in all patients. The median follow-up was 30 months (16 to 47 months), clinical healing of the anal fistula occurred in 75 patients (96.2%). The median operative time was 25 minutes (18 to 45 minutes). The mean complete healing time was 16 days (9 to 46 days). The median healing time for the external anal fistula opening was 2 weeks (range, 2 to 3 weeks), and the inter-sphincteric groove incision healing time was 4 weeks (range, 3 to 7 weeks). The median hospital stay after operation was 5 days. Fistula recurred in 2 patients because of spontaneous expulsion of the plug at 7 days post-surgery; perianal abscess occurred in 1 patient. The anal function was evaluated in 70 patients of the 78 patients. Perfect control of continence was recorded for 97.1% of the patients (68 out of 70 patients). Two patients were identified to a rare complication of gas incontinence (Wexner score 1). CONCLUSIONS LIFT-plug procedure for the treatment of trans-sphincteric fistulas is a simple procedure with a high healing rate, minimal invasiveness, quick healing, and without disturbance to anal function. LIFT-plug is an ideal procedure for trans-sphincteric fistula.

The treatment of anal fistula: second ACPGBI Position Statement - 2018

It is over 10 years since the first ACPGBI Position Statement on the management of anal fistula was published in 2007. This second edition is the result of scrutiny of the literature published during this time; it updates the original Position Statement and reviews the published evidence surrounding treatments for anal fistula that have been developed since the original publication.

What happens after a failed LIFT for anal fistula?

BACKGROUND

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) was developed to treat transsphincteric anal fistulas. The aftermath of a failed LIFT has not been well documented.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of LIFT procedure for transsphincteric anal fistula between March 2012 and September 2016.

RESULTS

53 patients with LIFT procedure were identified, 20 (37.7%) had persistent fistula with median followup of 4 months. Following LIFT, recurrence of fistula was transsphincteric (75%) or intersphincteric (25%) (p = NS). Persistent transsphincteric fistulas after LIFT were treated with seton (71.4%) followed by advancement flap (20%) or fistulotomy (50%). Of the recurrent intersphincteric fistulas, 50% underwent seton placement followed by fistulotomy, or advancement flap. Of the patients who underwent surgery after failed LIFT, 50% have had resolution of the fistula; 31.7% are still undergoing treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent surgery after failed LIFT had 50% healing with placement of seton followed by fistulotomy or rectal advancement flap.

Perianal Crohn's disease: challenges and solutions

Perianal Crohn’s disease affects a significant number of patients with Crohn’s disease and is associated with poor quality of life. The nature of the disease, compounded by presentation of various disease severities, has made the treatment of perianal Crohn’s disease difficult. The field continues to evolve with the use of both historical and contemporary solutions to address the challenges associated with it. The goal of this article is to review current literature regarding medical and surgical treatment, as well as the future directions of therapy.

Adoption and success rates of perineal procedures for fistula-in-ano: a systematic review

AIM

Several sphincter-preserving techniques have been described with extremely encouraging initial reports. However, more recent studies have failed to confirm the positive early results. We evaluate the adoption and success rates of advancement flap procedures (AFP), fibrin glue sealant (FGS), anal collagen plug (ACP) and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedures based on their evolution in time for the management of anal fistula.

METHOD

A PubMed search from 1992 to 2015. An assessment of adoption, duration of study and success rate was undertaken.

RESULTS

We found 133 studies (5604 patients): AFP (40 studies, 2333 patients), FGS (31 studies, 871 patients), LIFT (19 studies, 759 patients), ACP (43 studies, 1641 patients). Success rates ranged from 0% to 100%. Study duration was significantly associated with success rates in AFP (P = 0.01) and FGS (P = 0.02) but not in LIFT or ACP. The duration of use of individual procedures since first publication was associated with success rate only in AFP (P = 0.027). There were no statistically significant differences in success rates relative to the number of the patients included in each study.

CONCLUSION

Success and adoption rates tend to decrease with time. Differences in patient selection, duration of follow-up, length of availability of the individual procedure and heterogeneity of treatment protocols contribute to the diverse results in the literature. Differences in success rates over time were evident, suggesting that both international trials and global best practice consensus are desirable. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with homogeneity and clear objective parameters would be needed to substantiate these findings.