Survival following salvage abdominoperineal resection for persistent and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: do these disease categories affect survival?

Posttreatment Surveillance of Anal Cancer

As the treatment path for anal cancers have become highly effective, prevalence of anal cancer survivors needing follow-up has multiplied over the past few decades. Successful long-term care of these patients warrants a robust surveillance program with 2 fold goals. First, to make an early diagnosis of persistent, progressive, or recurrent disease. Second, to monitor for acute and/or delayed toxicities as well as adverse effects from therapy. The goal of this article is to expand on the role and components of posttreatment surveillance of anal cancer.

Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology: Guidelines for the management of anal canal cancer

BACKGROUND

Anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a relatively uncommon neoplasia, and it is mostly a local-regional cancer, of low metastatic potential (only 15%), resulting in cure in most cases treated with definitive chemoradiation. On the other hand, its incidence has been steadily increasing over the last decades, which makes it an important public health problem. In an effort to provide surgeons and oncologists who treat patients with anal cancer with the most updated information based on the best scientific evidence, the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO) has produced the present guideline for the management of anal canal SCC, focused on the main topics related to daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The SBCO developed the present guidelines to provide recommendations on the main topics related to the management of anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) based on current scientific evidence.

METHODS

Between October 2022 and January 2023, 14 experts met to develop the guidelines for the management of anal canal cancer. A total of 30 relevant topics were distributed among the participants. The methodological quality of a final list with 121 sources was evaluated, all the evidence was examined and revised, and the management guidelines were formulated by the 14-expert committee. To reach a final consensus, all the topics were reviewed in a meeting that was attended by all the experts.

RESULTS

The proposed guidelines contained 30 topics considered to be highly relevant in the management of anal canal cancer, covering subjects related to screening recommendations, preventive measures, tests required for diagnosing and staging, treatment strategies, response assessment after chemoradiotherapy, surgical technique-related aspects, and follow-up recommendations. In addition, screening and response assessment algorithms, and a checklist were proposed to summarize the important information and offer an updated tool to assist surgeons and oncologists who treat anal canal cancer and in providing the best care to their patients.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines summarize recommendations based on the most current scientific evidence on relevant aspects of anal canal cancer management and are a practical guide to help surgeons and oncologists who treat anal canal cancer make the best therapeutic decisions.

Oncologic Outcomes of Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Initially Managed with Chemoradiation

Background: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) has been advocated for persistent or recurrent disease after failure of chemoradiation (CRT) for anal squamous cell cancer (SCC). Treatment with salvage APR can potentially achieve a cure. This study aimed to analyze oncological outcomes for salvage APR in a recent time period at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent APR for biopsy-proven persistent or recurrent anal SCC between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2020 was performed. Patients with stage IV disease at the time of initial diagnosis and patients with missing data were excluded. Univariate analysis was used with a chi-square test for categorical variables, and non-parametric tests were used for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate disease-specific (DSS), post-APR local recurrence-free (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: A total of 96 patients were included in the analysis: 39 (41%) with persistent disease and 57 (59%) with recurrent SCC after chemoradiation had been completed. The median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 11-47). Forty-nine patients (51%) underwent extended APR and/or pelvic exenteration. Eight (8%) patients developed local recurrence, 30 (31%) developed local and distant recurrences, and 16 (17%) developed distant recurrences alone. The 3-year DSS, post-APR local recurrence-free survival, and disease-free survival were 53.8% (95% CI 43.5-66.5%), 54.5% (95% CI 44.4-66.8%), and 26.8% (95% CI 18.6-38.7%), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, positive microscopic margin (OR 10.0, 95% CI 2.16-46.12, p = 0.003), positive nodes in the surgical specimen (OR 9.19, 95% CI 1.99-42.52, p = 0.005), and lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.61 95% CI 1.05-6.51, p = 0.04) were associated with recurrence of disease. Gender, indication for APR (recurrent vs. persistent disease), HIV status, extent of surgery, or type of reconstruction did not influence survival outcomes. Twenty patients had targeted tumor-sequencing data available. Nine patients had PIK3CA mutations, seven of whom experienced a recurrence. Conclusions: Salvage APR for anal SCC after failed CRT was associated with poor disease-specific survival and low recurrence-free survival. Anal SCC patients undergoing salvage APR should be counseled that microscopic positive margins, positive lymph nodes, or the presence of lymphovascular invasion in the APR specimen are prognosticators for disease relapse. Our results accentuate the necessity for additional treatment strategies for the ongoing treatment challenge of persistent or recurrent anal SCC after failed CRT.

Salvage Treatment of Recurrent or Persistent Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Role of Multi-modality Therapy

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for recurrent or persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma is surgical salvage, but disease control and survival are suboptimal.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Patients treated for recurrent or persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma at our institution from 2002 to 2022 were included. Patients were classified by type of salvage treatment received: surgery alone vs. reirradiation followed by surgery and by whether they received intraoperative radiation at the time of surgery. Clinical and pathologic variables were collected and assessed for association with risk of second local recurrence and death from any cause.

RESULTS

Sixty four patients were included; 55(85.9%) were treated with surgery alone and 9 (14.1%) were treated with reirradiation followed by surgery. Median (IQR) follow up from the time of salvage treatment was 40.0 (20.3-68.0) months. The 3-year cumulative incidence of second local recurrence (95% CI) after salvage surgery was 36% (24%-48%); 39% (26%-52%) for patients treated with surgery alone and 15% (0.46%-51%) for patients treated with reirradiation followed by surgery. Factors associated with increased second local recurrence after salvage surgery included a locoregional recurrence, lymphovascular space invasion and positive surgical margins. The 3-year overall survival (95% CI) after salvage surgery was 70% (59%-83%); 68% (7%-56%) after surgery alone and 89% (10.5%-70.6%) after reirradiation followed by surgery. Factors associated with worse overall survival included male sex, a larger recurrent tumor and positive surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 60% of patients achieved pelvic control after salvage therapy for recurrent or persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma. Although receipt of reirradiation and intraoperative radiation were not associated with improved second local recurrence or overall survival in our cohort, patients with positive surgical margins and lymphovascular space invasion on surgical pathology had higher rates of pelvic recurrence after salvage surgery and may benefit from escalated salvage therapy.

Survival outcomes following salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent and persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The primary treatment for locoregional failure following chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, it is necessary to distinguish between recurrent and persistent diseases because of their varied pathologies. We aimed to clarify the survival outcomes following salvage APR for recurrent and persistent diseases and investigate the significance of salvage APR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicentre retrospective cohort study used clinical data from 47 hospitals. All patients were diagnosed with SCCA and underwent definitive radiotherapy as the primary treatment between 1991 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) was compared between the following cohorts: salvage APR for recurrence, salvage APR for persistence, non-salvage APR for recurrence, and non-salvage APR for persistence.

RESULTS

Five-year OS of salvage APR for recurrence, salvage APR for persistence, non-salvage APR for recurrence, and non-salvage APR for persistence were 75% (46%-90%), 36% (21%-51%), 42% (21%-61%), and 47% (33%-60%), respectively. OS of salvage APR for the recurrent disease was significantly higher than that for persistent disease (p = 0.00597). For recurrent disease, OS following salvage APR was significantly higher than that following non-salvage APR (p = 0.0204); however, for persistent disease, there was no significant difference between salvage and non-salvage APR (p = 0.928).

CONCLUSION

Survival outcomes following salvage APR for persistent disease were significantly worse than that for recurrent disease. Salvage APR did not improve survival outcomes for persistent disease compared to non-salvage APR. These results will elicit a review of persistent disease treatment strategies.

Failure of Initial Curative Treatment for Non-Metastatic Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Prognostic Factors Analysis to Stratified Treatment

In squamous cell anal canal neoplasms, persistent disease or recurrence after initial chemoradiotherapy are not the rule, yet their occurrence deserves to be analyzed to better identify prognostics factors. The aim of our study was to describe the patterns of failures of the initial treatment, their subsequent evolution and to identify prognostic factors in these relapsed patients. All patients with non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma initially treated with curative intent at the Centre Antoine Lacassagne between 1999 and 2019, and who presented persistent disease or recurrence were analyzed. The median follow-up was 44 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. From our database of 528 patients, 77 patients were eligible: 25 with persistent disease and 52 with recurrence after complete response. The median overall survival was 39 months (95% CI: 25.5-52.3 months) from the date of treatment failure. In univariate analysis, prognostic factors were gender, initial lymph node status, type of failure, response to treatment's failure. In multivariate analysis, only female gender remained statistically significant (HR 0.43- P=0.016). 32% of patients with persistent disease had metastatic status. 17.3% and 5.8% of recurrences respectively occurred after three and five years of follow-up. Systematic imaging could be performed after initial treatment because of distant lesions in one third of patients with persistent disease. The follow-up should not be interrupted before five years, given the significant frequency of late recurrences. In multivariate analysis, only female gender was statistically significant. Stratified treatment based on prognostic factors could be envisaged, the details of which remain to be defined.

Evolution of the Role of Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer

Prior to the 1980s, the primary management of localized anal cancer was surgical resection. Dr. Norman Nigro and colleagues introduced neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to abdominoperineal resection. Chemoradiotherapy 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C afforded patients complete pathologic response and obviated the need for upfront surgery. More recent studies have attempted to alter or exclude chemotherapy used in the Nigro regimen to mitigate toxicity, often with worse outcomes. Reductions in acute adverse effects have been associated with marked advancements in radiotherapy delivery using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guidance radiation delivery, resulting in increased tolerance to greater radiation doses. Ongoing trials are attempting to improve IMRT-based treatment of locally advanced disease with efforts to increase personalized treatment. Studies are also examining the role of newer treatment modalities such as proton therapy in treating anal cancer. Here we review the evolution of radiotherapy for anal cancer and describe recent advances. We also elaborate on radiotherapy's role in locally persistent or recurrent anal cancer.

Survival and Operative Outcomes After Salvage Surgery for Recurrent or Persistent Anal Cancer

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a relatively rare cancer comprising less than 2.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. The standard treatment for anal SCC is primary chemoradiation therapy which can result in complete regression. After successful treatment, the 5-year survival is approximately 80%. However, up to 30% of patients experience recurrent persistent or recurrent disease. The role of surgery in the treatment of anal cancer, therefore, is limited to the management of recurrent or persistent disease with abdominoperineal resection and/or en bloc adjacent organ excision. Salvage surgery after irradiated anal cancer can be technically demanding in terms of acquisition of oncologically safe surgical margins and minimization of postoperative morbidity. In addition, 5-year survival outcomes after salvage resection have been reported to vary from 23% to 69%. Positive resection margins are generally regarded as the important risk factor associated with poor survival outcome. Perineal wound complications are the most common major postoperative morbidity. Because of the challenges of primary wound closure after salvage abdominoperineal resection, myocutaneous flap reconstruction has been performed to reduce the severity of perianal would complications. We, therefore, descriptively reviewed contemporary published evidence describing the treatment and outcomes after salvage surgery for persistent or recurrent anal SCC.

A systematic review of outcomes after salvage abdominoperineal resection for persistent or recurrent anal squamous cell cancer

AIM

Up to 30% of patients with squamous cell cancer of the anus (SCCA) will require a salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) for either persistent or recurrent disease. The objective of this study was to assess cancer-related outcomes in patients with (i) persistent or (ii) recurrent SCCA.

METHOD

Embase and MEDLINE were searched. Publications were included if they assessed overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence or metastatic disease after salvage APR for persistent or recurrent SCCA.

RESULTS

A total of 28 retrospective case series (study size ranged from nine to 111) met our inclusion criteria. The median time to salvage APR was 2.6 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.6-5.0 months, six studies] for persistent disease and 27.6 months (IQR 15.0-32.7 months, five studies) for recurrent disease. The median 5-year OS from the time of salvage APR was 45.0% (IQR 32.0%-52.3%, 10 studies) for persistent disease and 51.0% (IQR 36.0%-60.9%, 11 studies) for recurrent disease. The median 5-year DFS following salvage APR was 44.0% (IQR 29.5%-53.0%, 10 studies) for all patients. Following salvage APR, the median locoregional recurrence rate was 23.5% (IQR 15.8%- 46.9%, 19 studies) and 9.0% (IQR 6.4%-13.3%, 16 studies) of patients developed metastatic disease after salvage APR.

CONCLUSION

Our review characterizes the best evidence for outcomes following salvage APR for patients with persistent or recurrent SCCA. The evidence is limited by the quality of included studies, as many were single centre case series.

Early versus late salvage abdominoperineal resection for anal squamous cell carcinoma: Is there a difference in survival?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The first-line treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma is Nigro protocol chemoradiotherapy. Some patients will fail curative intent chemoradiotherapy and have persistent disease while others may have an initial response followed by disease recurrence. The goal of this study is to investigate survival in anal squamous cell carcinoma patients who fail first-line treatment.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2004-2013) was used to identify patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma. The primary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

There were 256 patients in the early salvage group who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) within 6 months of completing chemoradiotherapy and 181 patients in the late salvage group who had APR 6 months or more after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Both groups of patients had similar tumor size (45  vs 50 mm; P = 0.07) and rate of positive margins (21.5% vs 15.6%;P = 0.13). There was no significant difference in overall survival between early and late salvage APR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.32; P = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival of anal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing early vs late salvage APR after failure of chemoradiotherapy is similar. As a result, patients with persistent disease should be offered surgery just as readily as those with recurrent disease.

So Now My Patient Has Squamous Cell Cancer: Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal and Anal Margin

Squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal and the anal margin are rare malignancies that are increasing in incidence. Patients with these tumors often experience delayed treatment due to delay in diagnosis or misdiagnosis of the condition. Distinguishing between anal canal and anal margin tumors has implications for staging and treatment. Chemoradiation therapy is the mainstay of treatment for anal canal squamous cell, with abdominoperineal resection reserved for salvage treatment in cases of persistent or recurrent disease. Early anal margin squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with wide local excision, but more advanced tumors require a combination of chemoradiation therapy and surgical excision.

Outcome of surgery for recurrent anal cancer: results from a tertiary referral centre

AIM

Chemoradiotherapy remains the first line of treatment for anal cancer with surgery reserved for cancer recurrence or persistence. The low incidence of anal cancer means that the numbers undergoing surgery is small with centralization for excision to regional cancer centres. We present our experience of abdominal perineal excision, with reconstruction of the perineal defect (APERR), within a tertiary centre.

METHOD

Over a 15-year period, data were collected retrospectively from notes of patients who underwent an APERR. The aim was to look at disease-free and overall survival and complications associated with flap reconstruction.

RESULTS

In the study period, 29 patients [median age = 62 (range: 42-81; interquartile range: 54-68) years] underwent APERR. Median follow-up was 77 (4-200) months. Thirteen patients died during follow-up; eight from their disease, with a median survival time of 16 (4-63) months. Five-year survival was 67%. Nine (31%) patients had recurrence during the follow up period; this was local (n = 2), regional (n = 4), distant (n = 2) or a combination (n = 1). Sixteen (55%) patients developed 24 complications, including nine (31%) flap complications and 10 (34%) parastomal hernias. Flap complications were flap failure (n = 1) requiring direct closure, flap dehiscence (n = 2), necrosis of flap tip (n = 1), wound infection (n = 4) and a bulky flap (n = 1) requiring liposuction.

CONCLUSION

APERR of anal cancer is a feasible technique with excellent oncological treatment and acceptable long-term complications, although a higher than expected rate of parastomal hernia was noted.

The prevalence and fate of the defunctioning stoma in patients with anal cancer: a regional experience following the ACT II trial

AIM

UK guidance advises the creation of a defunctioning stoma for anal tumours infiltrating the vagina, impending obstruction or significant faecal incontinence. Other patients may be offered a defunctioning stoma at the discretion of the clinician. The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence and fate of defunctioning stomas in a regional anal cancer service, with reference to the results from the recent ACT II trial.

METHOD

Oncological treatment was standardized as described in the ACT II trial. All patients from 2010 to 2013 inclusive were included. Collected data were correlated with both the IMRT guidelines and the outcomes of the ACT II trial. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to stoma-free survival to the end of the study period.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were identified during the study period, of whom 51% had a defunctioning stoma. Twenty were performed for anterior tumours without infiltration into the vagina (Group A), whilst 19 had a stoma for indications as set out by the guidelines (Group B). Stoma reversal was performed in 41% of patients, 13/20 in Group A and 3/19 in Group B. The median time to reversal was 11 months. Eleven deaths were recorded and six patients still had their stomas at time of death. Stoma-free survival was 74%. No new ano-vaginal fistulation occurred as a consequence of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The tumour features that are indications for defunctioning as advised by the UK IMRT guidelines are associated with a poorer overall outcome, and these stomas are less likely to be reversed. The majority of stomas, however, were formed for anterior tumours without infiltration into the vagina and were more likely to be successfully reversed.

Locally Recurrent Disease Related to Anal Canal Cancers

Surgery for anal cancer is usually reserved for patients with persistent disease or local recurrence after definitive chemoradiation therapy. Patients with local recurrence should be re-evaluated for evidence of metastatic disease using positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and the local anatomy should be delineated with MRI. Eligible patients should undergo tailored surgery with the aim of achieving an R0 resection. Management is best undertaken within a specialized multidisciplinary setting. Careful patient selection and shared decision making are paramount for achieving acceptable patient-centered outcomes.