Home visits as part of a new care pathway (iAID) to improve quality of care and quality of life in ostomy patients: a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial

The effects of a nurse-led discharge planning on the health outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with stomas: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Nursing care of colorectal cancer patients with stomas presents unique challenges, particularly during the transition from hospital to home. Early discharge programs can assist patients during this critical period. However, the effects of delivering a nurse-led discharge planning program remain under-studied.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effects of a nurse-led discharge planning on the quality of discharge education, stoma self-efficacy, readiness for hospital discharge, stoma quality of life, incidence of stoma complications, unplanned readmission rate, and length of stays.

DESIGN

Assessor-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial with a repeated-measures design.

SETTING(S)

Participants were recruited from inpatients in the colorectal surgery unit of a university-affiliated hospital in Fujian, China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 160 patients with colorectal cancer who received enterostomy surgery and were scheduled to be discharged to their homes.

METHOD

Participants were randomly allocated to the experimental and control groups. The former received nurse-led discharge planning in addition to the usual discharge education, while the control group received only the usual discharge education. The program included an assessment, health education, stoma care, stoma support, discharge review, discharge medication and checklist integration, discharge referral, and post-hospital follow-up. Baseline data were collected prior to the intervention (T0). Data on the quality of discharge teaching, readiness for hospital discharge, stoma self-efficacy, and stoma quality of life were measured on the day of discharge from the hospital (T1). Patients' stoma self-efficacy and quality of life were repeat-measured 30 (T2) and 90 days post-discharge (T3). Data on stoma complications (T1, T2, T3), length of stays (T1), and unplanned readmission (T2, T3) were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Participants in the intervention group showed significant improvement in the quality of discharge teaching, readiness for hospital discharge, stoma self-efficacy, stoma quality of life, complications, and unplanned readmission, compared to the control group (p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in length of stays (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The program was effective for improving quality of discharge teaching, readiness for hospital discharge, stoma self-efficacy, and stoma quality of life, as well as for reducing complications and unplanned readmission among stoma patients. Integration of discharge planning into the usual process of care is recommended for clinical practice to facilitate a successful transition from hospital to home.

REGISTRATION

This study was registered at the Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR2200058756) on April 16, 2022, and participant recruitment was initiated in May 2022.

Management of adult intestinal stomas: The 2023 French guidelines

AIM

Digestive stoma are frequently performed. The last French guidelines have been published twenty years ago. Our aim was to update French clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative management of digestive stoma and stoma-related complications.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of French and English articles published between January 2000 and May 2022 was performed. Only digestive stoma for fecal evacuation in adults were considered. Stoma in children, urinary stoma, digestive stoma for enteral nutrition, and rare stoma (Koch, perineal) were not included.

RESULTS

Guidelines include the surgical landmarks to create digestive stoma (ideal location, mucocutaneous anastomosis, utility of support rods, use of prophylactic mesh), the perioperative clinical practice guidelines (patient education, preoperative ostomy site marking, postoperative equipment, prescriptions, and follow-up), the management of early stoma-related complications (difficulties for nursing, high output, stoma necrosis, retraction, abscess and peristomal skin complications), and the management of late stoma-related complications (stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia, stoma stenosis, late stoma retraction). A level of evidence was assigned to each statement.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines will be very useful in clinical practice, and allow to delete some outdated dogma.

Care fragmentation is associated with increased mortality after ileostomy creation

BACKGROUND

Ileostomy is the mainstay treatment option for various gastrointestinal conditions. Given the increased risk of post-discharge complications and high readmission rates that can be further aggravated by receiving care at different facilities (care fragmentation), further examination is necessary. We thus used a national cohort to explore the associations of care fragmentation among ileostomy patients experiencing adverse outcomes and increased hospitalization expenditures.

METHODS

All adult hospitalizations for ileostomy were tabulated from the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Those readmitted within 90 days after discharge were included for analysis. Patients treated at a different facility than the original location where the index ileostomy was performed were categorized into the care-fragmented cohort. Multivariable regressions were developed to characterize the association of the care-fragmented cohort with postoperative outcomes, readmissions, and expenditures.

RESULTS

Of 52,254 patients with ileostomy creation hospitalizations with 90-day nonelective readmission, 9,045 (17.3%) experienced care fragmentation. Following risk adjustment, those experiencing care fragmentation faced increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.54-2.12), cardiac (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.42-1.85), respiratory (adjusted odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.53-1.91), infectious (adjusted odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.43), and thromboembolic (adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.45) complications. Furthermore, patients experiencing care fragmentation were more likely to have increased hospitalization costs ($1,700, 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.5).

CONCLUSION

Care fragmentation in ileostomy patients demonstrated an increased risk for mortality, postoperative complications, and increased hospitalization expenses. To mitigate risks for adverse outcomes, future studies should evaluate the impacts of inter-hospital communication with the goal of improving care continuity and optimizing healthcare delivery for care-fragmented populations.

Better stoma care using the Stoma App: does it help? A first randomized double-blind clinical trial on the effect of mobile healthcare on quality of life in stoma patients

BACKGROUND

Receiving a stoma significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Coping with this new situation can be difficult, which may result in a variety of physical and psychosocial problems. It is essential to provide adequate guidance to help patients cope with their stoma, as this positively influences self-efficacy in return. Higher self-efficacy reduces psychosocial problems increasing patient's quality of life. This study investigates whether a new mobile application, the Stoma App, improves quality of life. And if personalized guidance, timed support, and peer contact offered as an in-app surplus makes a difference.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2021 and April 2023. Patients aged > 18 years undergoing ileostomy or colostomy surgery, in possession of a compatible smartphone were included. The intervention group received the full version of the app containing personalized and time guidance, peer support, and generic (non-personalized) stoma-related information. The control group received a restricted version with only generic information. Primary outcome was stoma quality of life. Secondary outcomes included psychological adaption, complications, re-admittance, reoperations, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The intervention version of the app was used by 96 patients and the control version by 112 patients. After correction for confounding, the intervention group reported a significant 3.1-point improvement in stoma-related quality of life one month postoperatively (p = 0.038). On secondary outcomes, no significant improvements could be retrieved of the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

The Stoma App improves the quality of life of stoma patients. Peer support and personalized guidance are of significant importance in building self-efficacy. It is to be recommended to implement Stoma app-freely available software qualifying as a medical device-in standard stoma care pathways for the benefits of both patients and healthcare providers.

Effect of continuous nursing on wound infection and quality of life in patients with cancer-related stoma: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively assess the effect of continuous nursing on wound infection and quality of life in patients with cancer-related stomas, providing an evidence-based rationale for the care of these patients. A computerised search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of continuous nursing on wound infection and quality of life in patients with cancer-related stoma was conducted from the time the database was created to March 2023. The retrieved literature was screened, data were extracted, and the quality of the literature was evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Seventeen RCTs involving 1437 patients were included. Of the 1437 patients, 728 were in the continuous nursing group and 709 were in the control group. The results showed that continuous nursing significantly reduced the rate of wound infection in patients with cancer-related stomas (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.53, p < 0.001) and improved their quality of life (standardised mean difference: 1.90. 95% CI: 1.32-2.47, p < 0.001). Available evidence suggests that continuous nursing for patients with cancer-related stomas can significantly reduce wound infections and improve their quality of life.

A personalized app to improve quality of life of patients with a stoma: A protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

AIM

Proper education, guidance and support is crucial before and following creation of a stoma. Patients with a stoma and their close relatives need to adapt to and cope with this new - and sometimes unforeseen - situation, which may result in insecurities and a variety of psychosocial problems. Self-efficacy is associated both with a reduction in psychosocial problems and with improved quality of life. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether self-reported quality of life of patients with a stoma can be enhanced by offering personalized and timed guidance, as well as peer contact, in a patient-centred mobile application.

METHOD

A multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Consented adults >18 years of age who will receive an ileostomy or colostomy and possess an eligible smartphone will be included. The intervention group will be given the full version of the application (containing personalized and timed guidance, such as operation-specific information and information on the associated care pathway) to install on their smartphone. In addition, the intervention group has access to a protected peer-support platform within the app. The control group will receive a restricted version of the application that contains only generic (non-personalized) stoma-related information. The primary outcome is quality of life, 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), such as psychological adaption, as well as number of complications, re-admission and re-operation rates and the length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Patient enrolment began in March 2021. Data collection was not complete when this protocol was submitted.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesize that patients with a stoma who are supported by the intervention version of the app will report a significantly higher quality of life than patients with a stoma who are supported by the control version of the app (ie, are not offered personalized and timed guidance and information and do not have access to peer support in the app).

Effectiveness of discharge education for patients undergoing general surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is some evidence to suggest that discharge education may reduce the risk of postoperative complications, however, a critical evaluation of the body of evidence is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of discharge education interventions versus standard education given to general surgery patients prior to, or up to 30-days of hospital discharge on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes were 30-day surgical site infection incidence and re-admission up to 28 days. Patient-reported outcomes included patient knowledge, self-confidence, satisfaction, and quality of life.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult general surgical patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE (Pubmed), CINAHL (EBSCO), EMBASE (Elsevier) and the Cochrane Library were searched in February 2022. Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions published between 2010 and 2022, with adults undergoing general surgical procedures receiving discharge education on surgical recovery, including wound management, were eligible for inclusion. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomised Studies. The Grading of Assessment, Development, Recommendations, and Evaluation was used to assess the certainty of the body of evidence based on the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Ten eligible studies (eight randomised control trials and two non-randomised studies of interventions) with 965 patients were included. Six randomised control trials assessed the effect of discharge education interventions on 28-day readmission (Odds ratio 0.88, 95 % confidence interval 0.56-1.38). Two randomised control trials assessed the effect of discharge education interventions on surgical site infection incidence (Odds ratio = 0.84, 95 % confidence interval 0.39-1.82). The results of the non-randomised studies of interventions were not pooled due to heterogeneity in outcome measures. The risk of bias was either moderate or high for all outcomes, and the body of evidence using GRADE was judged as very low for all outcomes studied.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of discharge education on the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing general surgery cannot be determined due to the uncertainty of the evidence base. Despite the increased use of web-based interventions to deliver discharge education to general surgery patients, larger samples in more rigorous multicentre randomised control trials with parallel process evaluations are needed to better understand the effect of discharge education on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021285392.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Discharge education may reduce the likelihood of surgical site infection and hospital readmission but the body of evidence is inconclusive.

Digital health as an enabler for hospital@home: A rising trend or just a vision?

Background

Hospital@home is a model of healthcare, where healthcare professionals actively treat patients in their homes for conditions that may otherwise require hospitalization. Similar models of care have been implemented in jurisdictions around the world over the past few years. However, there are new developments in health informatics including digital health and participatory health informatics that may have an impact on hospital@home approaches.

Objectives

This study aims to identify the current state of implementation of emerging concepts into the hospital@home research and models of care; to identify strengths and weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with the models of care; and to suggest a research agenda.

Methods

We employed two research methodologies, namely, a literature review and a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. The literature from the last 10 years was collected from PubMed using the search string "hospital at home" OR "care at home" OR "patient at home." Relevant information was extracted from the included articles.

Results

Title and abstract review were conducted on 1,371 articles. The full-text review was conducted on 82 articles. Data were extracted from 42 articles that met our review criteria. Most of the studies originated from the United States and Spain. Several medical conditions were considered. The use of digital tools and technologies was rarely reported. In particular, innovative approaches such as wearables or sensor technologies were rarely used. The current landscape of hospital@home models of care simply delivers hospital care in the patient's home. Tools or approaches from taking a participatory health informatics design approach involving a range of stakeholders (such as patients and their caregivers) were not reported in the literature reviewed. In addition, emerging technologies supporting mobile health applications, wearable technologies, and remote monitoring were rarely discussed.

Conclusion

There are multiple benefits and opportunities associated with hospital@home implementations. There are also threats and weaknesses associated with the use of this model of care. Some weaknesses could be addressed by using digital health and wearable technologies to support patient monitoring and treatment at home. Employing a participatory health informatics approach to design and implementation could help to ensure the acceptance of such care models.

The comparison between experimental nursing and routine nursing interventions on the quality of life of stoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The advance in nursing care for stoma patients is a challenging issue, which will influence the life quality. The quality of life is a major issue in the recovery of stoma patients. The evidence of experimental nursing has not been explored enough. A systematic search and a meta-analysis were performed for the studies of experimental nursing interventions versus routine warming interventions on patients with a stoma. The comparisons between nursing interventions were performed to find which kind of intervention will be superior in improving life quality. After a restricted selection, 10 studies, 460 subjects with experimental nursing intervention, and 478 controls with the routine nursing intervention were enrolled in a variety of causes of the stoma. The focused outcome was the quality of life. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4. Among the stoma patients, the meta-analysis favours the experimental nursing intervention group with higher scores of life quality when compared to the routine nursing intervention group. The meta-analysis results were with positive mean differences, significant tests for overall effect, and significant heterogeneities in the random-effects model. The experimental nursing intervention showed higher positive effects on the quality of life when compared to routine nursing intervention for stoma patients. Experimental nursing intervention might be an option for stoma nursing practitioners to improve stoma care.

Continuing Care Bundle in Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection with Permanent Stoma

Objective. A continuing care bundle can achieve a better outcome than a single implementation after discharge. This study aims to investigate the effect of this intervention in elderly patients with rectal cancer after radical resection with a permanent stoma. Methods. Elderly patients diagnosed with rectal cancer underwent radical resection with permanent stoma, they were divided into the control group (n = 42) and bundle group (n = 42). The control group received the conventional care, and the bundle group received the continuing care bundle in addition to the conventional care. At 1- and 3-month after discharge, self-efficacy, self-care knowledge, ability to change stoma appliances, negative emotions, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were observed. Results. The increased levels of self-efficacy, self-care knowledge, and ability to change stoma appliances were displayed in the bundle group after discharge as compared with that in the control group, along with the enhanced score of SF-36 subscales, including physical function (PF), role physical (RP), global health (GH) and vitality (V), social function (SF), and mental health (MH). Furthermore, patients showed alleviated depression and anxiety after the continuing care bundle as compared to those after conventional care. Besides, the bundle groups had higher patient satisfaction than the control group. Conclusions. Continuing care bundle can serve as an effectiveness intervention in elderly rectal cancer patients after radical resection with permanent stoma via increasing self-efficacy and self-care knowledge, enhancing the ability to change stoma appliance, reliving the negative emotion, and improving quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Effects of continuous care on health outcomes in patients with stoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Continuing care, which is an extension of post-discharge care, is recognized as a crucial element of high-quality health services and is essential to patients. This systematic review aims to identify the effectiveness of continuing care for patients with stomas.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Register and Web of Science databases were searched. Study selection and quality appraisal were performed independently by two reviewers. We calculated the mean differences (MD) or the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals and assessed heterogeneity.

Results

Nine studies (1134 participants) met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis revealed that, in the continuous care group, the stoma self-efficacy (MD ​= ​6.46; 95% CI ​= ​3.81–9.11; P ​< ​0.001; I² ​= ​0%), and the quality of life (MD ​= ​7.48; 95% CI ​= ​5.13–9.82; P ​< ​0.001; I² ​= ​0%) increased significantly 1 month after discharge; stoma adjustment and care satisfaction also showed a trend toward improvement while stoma complications (RR ​= ​0.71; 95% CI ​= ​0.58–0.87; P ​= ​0.001; I² ​= ​25%) decreased significantly. Continuing care did not decrease hospital readmission rates or medical costs.

Conclusions

Continuing care showed beneficial effects in improving health outcomes and care satisfaction for patients with stomas compared with routine care. We proposed an integrated continuing care program with different elements and recommendations for its implementation.

Transition Home Following New Fecal Ostomy Creation: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Perioperative ostomy education is essential for patients to develop skills and comfort with self-care at home with a new ostomy, but shortened hospital length of stay (LOS) reduces time for postoperative education for patients. This study explored the initial experiences and care needs of patients who have undergone creation of a new ostomy during their transition from hospital to home.

DESIGN

Qualitative interpretive description using latent content analysis.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Thirteen patients who had undergone an elective colorectal surgery involving creation of an ostomy were interviewed. Participants were 33 to 78 years of age, 54% were female, and 62% were undergoing ostomy creation for colorectal cancer operations. Eleven participants underwent temporary ileostomy creation, and 2 patients had permanent end colostomies created.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted in person and audiotaped by study investigators within 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. Audiotapes were transcribed verbatim by trained transcriptionists, and each transcript was reviewed in duplicate by study investigators. A latent content analysis method was used to determine the implied meaning in participants' experiences of having a new ostomy.

RESULTS

The transition from hospital to home with a new ostomy was illustrated by 5 major themes: (1) Having an ostomy is a life-changing and bizarre experience; (2) Adjustment and adaptation occur through acceptance and self-reliance; (3) It's a hands-on thing: with the role of WOC nurse providing support in achieving independence; (4) Improved home care infrastructure is needed; and (5) Practical advice shared from experiential learning.

CONCLUSION

Patients with new ostomies are motivated and able to cope with the ostomy and regain independence over a short period after surgery. Shorter LOS does not impede ostomy education so long as adequate home care and support group programs are available. Knowledge gained through this study will assist WOC nurses in managing patients' expectations and the planning and delivery of education to patients with newly created ostomies.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of self-management interventions in people with a stoma

AIMS

Explore the evidence from randomized controlled trials for the effect of self-management interventions on quality of life, self-management skills and self-efficacy, and to explore which intervention characteristics are associated with effectiveness.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the literature was conducted in these databases: MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID) and PsychINFO (OVID) from January 2000 to February 2020.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies were included if participants had a bowel stoma, were over the age of 18 and the design was a randomized controlled trial of a self-management programme. The outcome measures for this review were quality of life, self-management skills and self-efficacy. The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy was used to code interventions for underlying components and alongside other intervention characteristics, associations with improvements in outcomes were explored.

RESULTS

The search identified 3141 articles, 16 of which were eligible. A meta-analysis of self-efficacy scores from five studies (N = 536) found an improvement in those that received the self-management intervention at follow-up with a 12-point mean difference compared with the usual care group. Effects on quality of life and self-management skills were mixed, and meta-analyses of these data were not possible. Across 13 studies an average of 10 behaviour change techniques were used with, credible source (e.g. nurse, doctor, therapist) (n = 13), instruction on how to perform the behaviour (n = 13), demonstration of the behaviour (n = 12) used most often. The behaviour change technique of self-monitoring was associated with an improvement in quality of life. The involvement of a nurse was associated with higher self-efficacy and self-management skills.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that self-management interventions can increase peoples' self-efficacy for managing their stoma.

IMPACT

A standardized approach to the reporting of interventions and the measures used is needed in future studies to better understand the effect on quality of life and self-management skills.

Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients With Clinical Care Pathways Reduces Emergency Department Utilization

Background

Standardizing care through pathways has the potential to reduce emergency department (ED) utilization. We developed and evaluated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care pathways for that purpose.

Methods

Over 2014-2016, IBD patients were retrospectively stratified into those managed and not managed by pathways. Patient data were extracted, and negative binomial regression used to predict the annual number of ED visits.

Results

There was a difference of 30.7 ED visits/100 patients between managed and nonmanaged at 12 months (P < 0.001). The incidence rate ratio of total ED visits occurring annually was 0.750 (P = 0.008).

Conclusions

Management with IBD care pathways reduces ED utilization.

Evaluation of effectiveness of the PlasmaJet surgical device in the treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer (PlaComOv-study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The most important goal for survival benefit of advanced stage ovarian cancer is to surgically remove all visible tumour, because complete cytoreductive surgery (CCS) has been shown to be associated with prolonged survival. In a remarkable number of women, CCS is very challenging. Especially in women with many small metastases on the peritoneum and intestinal surface, conventional CCS with electrosurgery is not able to be "complete" in removing safely all visible tumour. In this randomized controlled trail (RCT) we investigate whether the use of the PlasmaJet Surgical Device increases the rate of CCS, and whether this indeed leads to a longer progression free and overall survival. The main research question is: does the use of the PlasmaJet Surgical Device in surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer result in an increased number of complete cytoreductive surgeries when compared with conventional surgical techniques. Secondary study objectives are: 30-day morbidity, duration of surgery, blood loss, length of hospitalisation, Quality of Life, disease-free survival, overall survival, percentage colostomy, cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

The study design is a multicentre single-blinded superiority RCT in two university and nine non-university hospitals in The Netherlands. Three hundred and thirty women undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage ovarian carcinoma (FIGO Stage IIIB-IV) will be randomized into two arms: use of the PlasmaJet (intervention group) versus the use of standard surgical instruments combined with electrocoagulation (control group). The primary outcome is the rate of complete cytoreductive surgery in both groups. Secondary study objectives are: 30-day morbidity, duration of surgery, blood loss, length of hospitalisation, Quality of Life, disease-free survival, overall survival, percentage colostomy, cost-effectiveness. Quality of life will be evaluated using validated questionnaires at baseline, at 1 and 6 months after surgery and at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years after surgery.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesize the additional value of the use of the PlasmaJet in CCS for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. More knowledge about efficacy, side effects, recurrence rates, cost effectiveness and pathology findings after using the PlasmaJet Device is advocated. This RCT may aid in this void.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register NTR6624 . Registered 18 August 2017. Medical Ethical Committee approval number: NL62035.078.17 (Medical Ethical Committee Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam).

Psychometric validation of the Stoma-QOL questionnaire in a Canadian cross-sectional sample of colostomy and ileostomy patients

OBJECTIVES

The Stoma-QOL questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) used to measure quality of life in patients with ileostomy or colostomy. This study assesses the Stoma-QOL's overall and item-level psychometric characteristics in patients with temporary stomas, and whether stoma-related quality of life differs by demographic characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of cross-sectional observational PRO data from hospitals in Vancouver, Canada. Patients registered for elective ileostomy or colostomy closure, over the age of 18, and able to read English were eligible for participation. Emergent and cancer-related cases were excluded. One-way analysis of variance was used to test for demographic differences in Stoma-QOL scores. Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability, and Rasch item-response theory was used to assess overall and item characteristics.

RESULTS

120 patients were included. No statistically significant difference in Stoma-QOL scores was found by age, sex, or socioeconomic status. Reliability was 0.93. Mean item responses ranged from 1.77 to 3.55 and item-total correlation ranged from 0.51 to 0.77. The Rasch item-response theory model demonstrated significant misfit, likely due to the misfit of item 9, which asks about sexuality, and high residual correlations between item pairs 6 and 8 about fatigue, and items 16 and 17 about social relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

The Stoma-QOL questionnaire is a well-designed PRO for measuring stoma-related quality of life. Demographic variables do not appear to have a strong influence on Stoma-QOL scores. Item 9 demonstrated misfit but removal likely does not improve the instrument. Future research should focus on revising items 6, 8, 16, and 17.