Long-term outcomes and quality of life following ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for high transsphincteric fistulas

Mid- and long-term functional outcomes of advancement flap for cryptoglandular perianal fistulas

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for perianal fistulas requires balancing fistula closure with the risk of complications such as incontinence. The advancement flap (AF) is a widely used sphincter-sparing technique, yet it appears to offer only marginally better outcomes compared to alternative techniques, with a notable incontinence rate. This study aimed to evaluate the success rate and long-term functional outcomes of AF at our tertiary referral center.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from electronic medical records and questionnaires distributed in December 2023. Patients aged 18 or older with primary or recurrent perianal fistulas treated with AF between 2013 and 2023 were included. Fistulas of non-cryptoglandular origin and rectovaginal fistulas were excluded. The primary outcome was fecal incontinence. Secondary outcomes included disease burden, fistula closure, and risk factors for recurrence.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included; 37 (46%) were women, mean age was 45 years, and 93% had a complex fistula. The median follow-up was 27 months (IQR 15.5-64). Before AF, 36% reported some degree of incontinence, increasing to 80% at long-term follow-up after AF. Specifically, 20 out of 26 (77%) preoperative fully continent patients reported incontinence issues at long-term follow-up. Fistula disease impact on daily life was higher for those who failed AF repair. Primary fistula closure was achieved in 35 patients (43%). No risk factors for AF failure could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Advancement flap repair of perianal fistulas is challenging and can lead to fecal incontinence, so thorough preoperative counseling, consistent long-term follow-up, and further research comparing alternative sphincter-sparing techniques are warranted.

Is the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure truly a sphincter preserving procedure for anal fistula? A scoping review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure has garnered popularity with its success rates and purported sphincter-continence preservation. However, there remains a paucity in the literature on the objective evaluation of sphincter integrity and fecal continence after the LIFT procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The present study undertakes a scoping review to systematically explore and map the published literature, to evaluate the sufficiency of data on the impact on continence in patients after the LIFT procedure.

DESIGN

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASe, CINAHL was performed from January 2007 to April 2020 and 597 publications were identified. Forty-two satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We performed a scoping review in accordance to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 3 (7.1%) of publications were randomized controlled trials, of which just 1 (2.4%) measured incontinence as a primary outcome. Continence was measured both pre- and post-LIFT in 30 (71.4%), of which 19 (45.2%) had a fixed protocol for continence assessment, which was heterogeneous between the studies. Continence was assessed using subjective scoring systems in 27 (64.3%) and objective measurement was performed in just 6 (14.3%). No studies performed post-operative anatomical assessment of the anal sphincter complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term continence in post-LIFT patients is not supported with adequately powered prospective longitudinal trials using rigorously protocoled pre- and post-operative assessment of continence. Future research that focuses on a combination of objective assessment using anal manometry as well as anatomical assessment of the sphincter complex on top of subjective evaluation is needed before we can be certain if LIFT is indeed a sphincter and continence preserving technique.

Understanding the anatomical basis of anorectal fistulas and their surgical management: exploring different types for enhanced precision and safety

Anorectal fistulas remain one of the most challenging conditions in colorectal surgery and require precise anatomical knowledge for successful management. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current evidence on the anatomical foundations of fistula development and treatment, particularly focusing on the cryptoglandular hypothesis and its clinical implications. A systematic analysis of the recent literature has examined the relationship between anatomical structures and fistula formation, classification systems, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic approaches. The review revealed that anatomical considerations fundamentally influence treatment outcomes, with modern imaging techniques achieving up to 98% accuracy in delineating fistula anatomy. Key findings demonstrate that surgical success rates vary significantly based on anatomical complexity: 92-97% for simple fistulas versus 40-95% for complex cases using sphincter-sparing techniques. Emerging minimally invasive approaches and regenerative therapies, including mesenchymal stem cells, show promising results with 50-60% healing rates in complex cases. Special considerations are needed for complex cases such as Crohn's disease-related and rectovaginal fistulas. This review provides surgeons with an evidence-based framework for selecting optimal treatment strategies based on anatomical considerations, emphasizing the importance of preserving the anal sphincter function while achieving complete fistula eradication. Integrating advanced imaging, surgical techniques, and emerging therapies offers new possibilities for improving patient outcomes. This review aimed to bridge the gap between anatomical knowledge and practical surgical application, enhance clinical decision-making, and improve patient outcomes in anorectal fistula management.

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for high transsphincteric fistulas: a double-center retrospective study with long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure in treating high transsphincteric fistulas.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the success rate of LIFT treatment in 82 patients with high transsphincteric fistulas involving at least one-third of the external sphincter. This study was carried out across 2 centers from November 2009 to February 2023.

RESULTS

All patients underwent successful surgery with a median operative time of 48.9 minutes (range, 20-80 minutes), and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. The median follow-up duration was 85.5 months (range, 4-120 months), with 5 patients (6.1%) lost to follow-up. Treatment was successful in 62 patients, whose symptoms disappeared and both the external opening and the intersphincteric incision completely healed, yielding an overall efficiency rate of 80.5%. There were 15 cases (19.5%) of treatment failure, including 6 (7.8%) that converted to intersphincteric anal fistula and 9 (11.7%) that experienced persistent or recurrent fistulas. Only 1 patient reported minor overflow during the postoperative follow-up, but no other patients reported any significant discomfort. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with surgical success and those with treatment failure in terms of fistula length, history of previous abscess or anal fistula surgery, number of external orifices or fistulas, and location of fistulas (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LIFT is a safe and effective sphincter-preserving procedure that yields satisfactory healing outcomes and has minimal impact on anal function.

Closed trans-intersphincteric fistulotomy: a new modified sphincter-sparing technique for high transsphincteric anal fistula

BACKGROUND

The main goals of surgery for fistula-in-ano are to completely resolve the condition and maintain optimal anal function. Effective management of the internal opening during and proper postoperative drainage of the intersphincter plane are crucial for achieving successful outcomes. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of a novel sphincter-sparing technique for treating high transsphincteric anal fistula (HTAF).

METHODS

This prospective study included 55 patients with HTAF who underwent closed trans-intersphincteric fistulotomy (CTiF) between July 2021 and April 2022 at our institution. Preoperative anorectal magnetic resonance imaging was performed for all patients. The primary outcome measures assessed the rate of fistula healing while the secondary outcome measures evaluated healing time, Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence score (CCF-FIS), 11-point visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

We included 55 patients with HTAF in this study. During a mean follow-up period of 9.3 months, CTiF achieved a healing rate of 90.91% (50/55). The mean time to recovery was 7.09 ± 1.94 weeks. Four (7.27%) patients developed postoperative urinary retention. At the 6-month follow-up, the CCF-FIS and VAS score were 0 [(0,0) range, 0-3] and 0 [(0,1); range, 0-4], respectively. Two patients with recurrent HTAF recovered after treatment with a transanal opening of intersphincteric space procedure, and three recovered after seton placement.

CONCLUSIONS

CTiF is a promising and effective sphincter-sparing technique for treating HTAF. To confirm long-term outcomes, larger sample size prospective randomized controlled trials are required.

Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for complex cryptoglandular fistulas (20-Item complex cryptoglandular fistula questionnaire™): a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

There are limited tools to measure the burden of disease and effectiveness of medical/surgical interventions in patients with cryptoglandular fistulas. The aim of this study was to explore concepts that are relevant and important to patients with complex cryptoglandular fistulas (CCF) and to develop a patient-centred, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess symptom burden and impacts of CCF.

METHODS

A targeted literature review was conducted, followed by one-to-one telephone interviews with five colorectal surgeons (USA, n = 3; UK, n = 1; Spain, n = 1) and 20 US adult patients with CCF to inform the development of a conceptual model and a CCF-specific PROM. The targeted literature review informed the development of the preliminary conceptual model and identified a PROM in the literature that was used as a reference to generate the draft CCF-specific PROM. The colorectal surgeon interviews provided insights on the experience of patients with CCF to refine the conceptual model, formulate probing questions for use in patient interviews, and to develop the draft CCF-specific PROM. Patients' descriptions of their experiences with symptoms and the impacts on their lives and evaluation of the draft CCF-specific PROM in concept elicitation and cognitive interviews were used to develop the final conceptual model and final CCF-specific PROM.

RESULTS

Ten symptoms (odour, pain during bowel movement, abscess, post-operative pain, discharge/drainage/leakage, anal/perianal pain, inflammation/swelling, skin irritation, bleeding and itchiness) and 11 impacts (discomfort, inability to exercise, embarrassment, difficulty sitting, worry about disease, adapted life to maintain hygiene, negatively impacted social life/isolation, inability to perform daily activities, reduced interest in sex, negatively impacted intimate relationships and negatively impacted mood) were reported as most salient by patients. The patient experience, clinician perspective, and literature review provided input to item generation. Evaluation of relevance and patient understanding through cognitive interviews with patients provided evidence for the content validity of the new patient-reported outcome measure: the 20-item Complex Cryptoglandular Fistula Questionnaire™ (CCFQ-20™).

CONCLUSION

The CCFQ-20™ is a new clinician-guided, patient-validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure that measures disease impact and quality of life in patients with CCF.

Postoperative pain following laser fistula closure versus ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Prior studies focus primarily on surgical outcomes of anal fistula treatment, such as healing rates, rather than patient-reported outcomes, such as postoperative pain, which could influence surgical choice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pain scores at 6 and 24 h postoperatively between laser closure and ligation of the intersphincteric tract for anal fistula.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

A quaternary hospital in Malaysia.

PATIENTS

Patients aged 18-75 years with high transsphincteric fistulas.

INTERVENTION

Fistula laser closure versus ligation of the fistula tract (LIFT) treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain scores, continence, quality of life (QOL), operative time, and treatment failure were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact test, student t-test, or Mann-Whitney with p < 0.05 denoting statistical significance.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were recruited (laser, n = 28, LIFT, n = 28). Median pain scores for laser versus LIFT at 6 h postoperatively were 1.0 versus 2.0 (Rest, p = 0.213) and 3.0 versus 4.0 (Movement, p = 0.448), respectively. At 24 h, this reduced to 2.5 in both arms at rest (p = 0.842) but increased to 4.8 versus 3.5 on movement (p = 0.383). Median operative time for laser was significantly shorter (32.5 min) than LIFT (p < 0.001). Laser treated patients trended toward quicker return to work (10.5 vs. 14.0, p = 0.181) but treatment failure was similar (54% vs. 50%, p = 0.71). No patients developed postoperative incontinence. Mean SF-36 scores increased from baseline (67.1 ± 17.0; 95% CI 63.6-82.4 vs. 71.3 ± 11.4; 95% CI 64.0-75.0) to 6 months postoperatively (77.7 ± 21.0; 95% CI 57.0-80.3 vs. 74.0 ± 14.3; 95% CI 67.6-81.4) regardless of the type of surgery (P > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

Patients with prior fistula surgery (approximately 20%) led to heterogeneity. The total laser energy delivered varied depending on fistula anatomy.

CONCLUSION

Laser fistula closure is an alternative to LIFT, with similar postoperative pain and shorter operative time despite more complex fistula anatomy in the laser arm, with a greater improvement in QOL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06212739.

The potential roles of gut microbiome in anal fistula

Anal fistula is a common proctological disease, but the thorough mechanisms of the anal fistula formation are still unclear. An increasing number of studies have revealed the crucial role of gut microbiota in intestinal diseases. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyze the intestinal microbiome in order to determine whether there are differences in the microbiome between anal fistula patients and healthy individuals. The microbiome samples were extracted by repeatedly wiping the rectal wall with intestinal swab. Before this operation, the whole intestine of all participants was irrigated and the score of the Boston bowel preparation scale reached 9. The biodiversity of gut microbiome of rectum revealed significant difference between anal fistula patients and healthy individuals. 36 discriminative taxa were identified by LEfSe analysis between two groups. At the phylum level, Synergistetes was enriched in anal fistula patients, while Proteobacteria was higher in healthy individuals. We also found that at the genus level, Blautia, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Megamonas and Anaerotruncus were highly enriched in anal fistula patients, while the microbiome of healthy individuals was enriched with Peptoniphilus and Corynebacterium. Spearman correlations showed the extensive and close association among genera and species. Finally, a diagnostic prediction model was constructed by random forest classifier, and the area under curve (AUC) reached 0.990. This study gave an important hint for analyzing gut microbiome of rectum in anal fistula patient.Keypoints.We use the 16S rRNA gene sequencing to test the microbiome samples extracted from the intestinal swab. This is the first study to explore the gut microbiome of rectum using this workflow. We also found the distinct gut microbiome of rectum differences between anal fistula patients and healthy individuals.

A Systematic Review of Epidemiology and Outcomes Associated with Local Surgical and Intersphincteric Ligation Procedures for Complex Cryptoglandular Fistulas

INTRODUCTION

This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed incidence/prevalence of cryptoglandular fistulas (CCF) and outcomes associated with local surgical and intersphincteric ligation procedures for CCFs.

METHODS

Two trained reviewers searched PubMed and Embase for observational studies evaluating the incidence/prevalence of cryptoglandular fistula and clinical outcomes of treatments for CCF after local surgical and intersphincteric ligation procedures for CCF.

RESULTS

In total 148 studies met a priori eligibility criteria for all cryptoglandular fistulas and all intervention types. Of those, two assessed incidence/prevalence of cryptoglandular fistulas. Eighteen reported clinical outcomes of surgeries of interest in CCF and were published in the past 5 years. Prevalence was reported as 1.35/10,000 non-Crohn's patients, and 52.6% of non-IBD patients were found to progress from anorectal abscess to fistula over 12 months. Primary healing rates ranged from 57.1% to 100%; recurrence occurred in a range of 4.9-60.7% and failure in 2.8-18.0% of patients. Limited published evidence suggests postoperative fecal incontinence and long-term postoperative pain were rare. Several of the studies were limited by single-center design with small sample sizes and short follow-up durations.

DISCUSSION

This SLR summarizes outcomes from specific surgical procedures for the treatment of CCF. Healing rates vary according to procedure and clinical factors. Differences in study design, outcome definition, and length of follow-up prevent direct comparison. Overall, published studies offer a wide range of findings with respect to recurrence. Postsurgical incontinence and long-term postoperative pain were rare in the included studies, but more research is needed to confirm rates of these conditions following CCF treatments.

CONCLUSION

Published studies on the epidemiology of CCF are rare and limited. Outcomes of local surgical and intersphincteric ligation procedures show differing success and failure rates, and more research is needed to compare outcomes across various procedures. (PROSPERO; registration number CRD42020177732).

Sphincter-Preserving Fistulectomy Is an Effective Minimally Invasive Technique for Complex Anal Fistulas

Background

The optimal treatment of complex anal fistulas remains unclear, though many different sphincter-preserving procedures have been described. A minimally invasive technique with a better outcome is desired. The purpose of this study was to present a new technique—sphincter-preserving fistulectomy (SPF) and its clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was performed to compare the efficacy and outcomes of SPF with ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in the management of complex anal fistulas in regards to postoperative pain, complications, wound healing time, recurrence, overall success rate, fecal continence function, and quality of life. Continence function was evaluated using the Wexner incontinence scale and anal manometry. The fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scale was used to assess patients' quality of life.

Results

From June 2020 to July 2021, 41 patients with 43 SPF procedures and 35 patients with 35 LIFT procedures were included. Postoperative pain was comparable between two groups. The morbidity rate and the mean wound healing time in the SPF group were lower than those in the LIFT group (2.3% vs. 48.6%, p < 0.001; 1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.4 months, p = 0.001). At a mean follow-up duration of 11.4 ± 3.5 months in the SPF group and 10.7 ± 4.3 months in the LIFT group, SPF achieved a better overall success rate than LIFT (97.7% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.014). Three patients in the SPF group and 4 patients in the LIFT group who all underwent a simultaneous fistulotomy procedure complained new incontinence of flatus. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in regards to the Wexner scores (p = 0.790), the maximum resting anal canal pressure (p = 0.641), the maximum squeeze pressure (p = 0.289), and the FIQL scores including lifestyle (p = 0.188), coping (p = 0.188), depression (p = 0.850), and embarrassment (p = 0.910).

Conclusions

SPF is a novel, safe, and effective minimally invasive technique for the management of complex anal fistulas, with a promising success rate and negligible impairment on continence. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of SPF.

OPTIMIZATION OF PARARECTAL FISTULA SURGICAL TREATMENT

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To improve the results of treatment of complex PF by the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: 27 patients with transsphincteric fistulas of the rectum of different complexity have been operated by two methods: by ligature method ("cutting seton") and by the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT).

RESULTS

Results: No early complications were noticed in patients who had been applied the technique of fistula ligation in the postoperative period. The pain syndrome was expressed insignificantly. The rehabilitation period was less than 12 days. Having analyzed the long-term results of the observation period lasting up to 26 months, we arrived at the conclusion that the choice of surgical treatment had little effect on the recurrence rate of pararectal fistula (21.4 and 15.38%, respectively). However, one LIFT patient had gas incontinence within 1 year of surgery in contrast to 4 patients who had had a cutting ligature method having anal incontinence for 1 year and 1 patient - during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Ligation of the fistula in the intersphincter tract is an effective sphincter-preserving operation, does not require additional equipment and expensive consumables, is characterized by minimal damage to the anal sphincter and a high percentage of closure of PF (84.6%). The recurrence rate does not exceed 15.38%.

The Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Technique for Simple and Complex Fistula-in-ano

Background Fistula-in-ano is one of the most common clinical condition encountered in a surgical outpatient department. Many treatment modalities have been described with variable outcomes but gold standard surgical treatment is yet to be agreed upon. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes of ligature of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique in the treatment of simple and complex fistula-in-ano with the primary objective of recurrence rate and broad objective of other postoperative complications during the period of study and after long-term follow-up.

Methods It is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from the patients who have been operated for fistula-in-ano using the LIFT technique at our institute from February 2018 to March 2020 and followed-up until September 2020.

Results A total of 56 patients with fistula-in-ano were treated with the LIFT procedure during the study period, of which 20 patients had simple fistula and 36 had complex fistula. A success rate of 83% was obtained with completely healed fistulas in 46 patients. No patient developed postoperative incontinence.

Conclusion Ligature of intersphincteric fistula tract is an effective treatment modality for fistula-in-ano with less procedure-related morbidity, but it is associated with a higher recurrence rate in simple fistula than in complex fistula.

Strategies for the treatment of colorectal cancer caused by gut microbiota

Colorectal cancer (CRC), also named as colon and rectal or bowel cancer, is one of the leading neoplasia diagnosed in the world. Genetic sequencing studies of microorganisms from the intestinal microbiota of patients with CRC revealed that changes in its composition occur with the development of the disease, which can play a fundamental role in its development, being mediated by the production of metabolites and toxins that damage enterocytes. Some microorganisms are frequently reported in the literature as the main agents of this process, such as the bacteria Fusobacterium nucleatum, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Thus, understanding the mechanisms and function of each microorganism in CRC is essential for the development of treatment tools that focus on the gut microbiota. This review verifies current research aimed at evaluating the microorganisms present in the microbiota that can influence the development of CRC, as well as possible forms of treatment that can prevent the initiation and/or spread of this disease. Due to the incidence of CRC, alternatives have been launched considering factors beyond those already known in the disease development, such as diet, fecal microbiota transplantation, use of probiotics and antibiotics, which have been widely studied for this purpose. However, despite being promising, the studies that focus on the development of new therapeutic approaches targeting the microorganisms that cause CRC still need to be improved and better developed, involving new techniques to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of these new methods.

LIFT: a feasible option for primary and recurrent fistulas

BACKGROUND

The development of a surgical solution for anal fistulas with minimal recurrence and morbidity remains a challenge. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), however, is a sphincter sparing technique that provides complete resolution of the transsphincteric fistula as well as minimizing recurrence and fecal incontinence. Our goal is to evaluate the efficacy of fistula tract ligation for primary and recurrent fistulas.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center case study was conducted from data between 2015 and 2019 in a large district hospital in Antwerp, Belgium. Patients who underwent LIFT were included. Demographic patient data as well as primary outcome during the follow-up period were collected. A systematic literature review and analysis was conducted with terms [ANAL FISTULA] [TREATMENT] [LIFT] [LIGATION OF INTERSPHINCTERIC FISTULA]. Primary healing and recurrence associated with surgical modifications were investigated.

RESULTS

4 out of 25 patients presented with early failure (84% primary success rate) after a median follow-up period of 7 months. The median time until recurrence was 105 days. The success rate after a redo ligation was 100%. Twenty-eight studies were included for review and divided into three groups depending on the technical variation of the used technique. The success rate was 74.2% for the LIFT group, 72.9% in the LIFT + group, and 77.5% in the mLIFT group p = .92.

CONCLUSION

LIFT is a feasible treatment option for primary and recurrent fistulas, with excellent success rates where fistula characteristics rather than chosen technique dictate the surgical outcome.

Clinical outcome and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for fistula closure over a 10-year period

PURPOSE

Gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) is an established surgical technique in the treatment of anorectal fistulas and fistulas to the vagina and the urinary system when previous closure options have failed. There is little evidence on the success rate of this procedure in the long term.

METHODS

This is a follow-up study on all patients undergoing GMT over a 10-year period at a tertiary referral center for complex fistulas. Postoperative function and quality of life were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (Wexner score, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score (FIQL), SF-12 and a brief questionnaire designed for this study). Sexual function was evaluated by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the International Index of Erectile Function.

RESULTS

Forty-seven gracilis muscle transpositions (GMT) in 46 patients were performed. Most treated patients had (neo-)-rectovaginal fistulas (n = 29). An overall fistula closure was achieved in 34 of 46 patients (74%): in 25 cases primarily by GMT (53%) and in nine patients with persistent or recurrent fistula by additional surgical procedures. A clinically apparent relapse occurred on average 276 days (median: 180 days) after GMT (mean follow-up 73.4 months).

CONCLUSION

GMT in our hands has a primary closure rate of 53%, and after further procedures, this rises to 74%. Fecal continence is impaired in patients having undergone GMT. The overall quality of life in patients after GMT is only slightly impaired, and sexual function is severely impaired in female patients.

LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano. Are outcomes good enough? A systematic review and meta-analysisis of observational studies

INTRODUCTION

Efficacy of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano remains under debate. However, there is scarcity of quality evidence analysing this issue. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of LIFT surgery in patients with posterior anal fistula.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy of LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula. MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar data sources were searched for key-words (MeSH terms): "LIFT" OR "Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract" AND "posterior anal fistula" OR "posterior fistula-in-ano". Original, observational and experimental, non-language restriction studies published from January 2000 to March 2020 and reporting outcomes on LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula were reviewed. Quality and potential biases were assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale, following AHRQ recommendations. Additional sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation (Beg and Egger's tets) were performed.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in recurrence rate among patients undergoing LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano in contrast to other locations (OR 1.36 [IC 95% 0.60-3.07]; p=.46). I² test value was 77%, expressing a fair heterogeneity among included studies. The weighed median for overall recurrence was 37.8% (RI 18.3-47.7%); with a weighed median of 47.1% (RI 30.7 - 63.7%) and 36.3% (RI 15.8-51.3%) (p=.436) respectively for recurrence after LIFT for posterior fistula and fistula in other locations. There was not clear evidence about the sample size ("n") of included studies nor the disparities in quality assessment of those, could justify the observed heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that there are no clear data in the literature for not performing the LIFT procedure in posteriorly located fistulas.

Long-term healing after complex anal fistula repair in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Complex anal fistula in Crohn's disease (CD) poses a challenging problem. We sought to evaluate long-term surgical healing of complex anal fistula in CD through the two robust repair options-ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) and advancement flap (AF).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted evaluating long-term healing rates in patients with CD with complex anal fistula undergoing LIFT or AF in 2008-2018. Fistula healing was defined as closure of external wounds, cessation of drainage and absence of pain. Short-term and long-term healing rates were compared. Cox proportional hazards model was performed to identify independent predictors of fistula healing.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 60 CD patients undergoing LIFT (n = 38) or AF (n = 22). The AF group included 8 dermal flaps. Patients having LIFT were younger (35 years vs 43 years; p = 0.007), more likely to have a seton at the time of repair (92% vs 68%; p = 0.03) and less likely to have had prior repair attempts (34% vs 68%; p = 0.02). Short-term fistula healing occurred in 65% (n = 39) of the overall study cohort. However, at final follow-up, median 36 months (range 6-192 months), only 46% (n = 28) of repaired fistulas were healed. Considering the overall status of the cohort's perianal health at final follow-up, including both repaired, secondary or novel anal fistulas, only 50% (n = 30) of all patients in the cohort had all fistula sites healed and maintained bowel continuity at final follow-up. On Cox proportional hazards analysis, LIFT independently predicted long-term fistula healing (hazard ratio 2.3; 95% confidence interval 1.1-4.9; p = 0.03). Only a small number of patients (n = 5; 8%) required fecal diversion (n = 3) and/or proctectomy (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of complex anal fistula in CD results in modest healing rates. LIFT independently predicts long-term healing. However, these results must be taken in context, considering differences in patient and fistula characteristics between groups. These results ought to be kept in mind when counseling CD patients with complex anal fistula.

Lift and VAAFT for high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: a single center retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

The management of complex anal fistulas remains a challenge, mainly due to the considerable risk of incontinence. We compared LIFT and VAAFT in the treatment of complex anal fistulas in terms of healing time, recurrence, continence, morbidity, and postoperative pain, focusing also on patients with local abscess at the time of surgery.

METHODS

We include all patients with high trans-sphincteric anal fistula even with abscess at the time of surgery. Anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, Cleveland Clinic fecal incontinence score, VAS score, and number of previous fistula treatment were recorded. The clinical examination defined healing, insufficiency or recurrence of the fistula.

RESULTS

Fifty-four consecutive patients are undergoing surgery: 26 patients underwent LIFT and 28 underwent VAAFT. During the 18 months of follow-up there were no differences in terms of AM, CCFIS and VAS scores. Days of healing, failure, and recurrence rate were comparable in both groups. The subgroup of patients with local abscess undergoing LIFT showed worse results in terms of failure and recurrence rate (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques are safe and effective and can offer long-term benefits. LIFT should not be used as a first treatment in high trans-sphincteric fistula with perianal abscess.

Optimized timing of using infliximab in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease

Infliximab (IFX), as a drug of first-line therapy, can alter the natural progression of Crohn's disease (CD), promote mucosal healing and reduce complications, hospitalizations, and the incidence of surgery. Perianal fistulas are responsible for the refractoriness of CD and represent a more aggressive disease. IFX has been demonstrated as the most effective drug for the treatment of perianal fistulizing CD. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of patients only partially respond to IFX, and optimization of the therapeutic strategy may increase clinical remission. There is a significant association between serum drug concentrations and the rates of fistula healing. Higher IFX levels during induction are associated with a complete fistula response in these patients. Given the apparent relapse of perianal fistulizing CD, maintenance therapy with IFX over a longer period seems to be more beneficial. It appears that patients without deep remission are at an increased risk of relapse after stopping anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. Thus, only patients in prolonged clinical remission should be considered for withdrawal of IFX treatment when biomarker and endoscopic remission is demonstrated, especially when the hyperintense signals of fistulas on T2-weighed images have disappeared on magnetic resonance imaging. Fundamentally, the optimal timing of IFX use is highly individualized and should be determined by a multidisciplinary team.

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic anal fistula. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. Surgery is the main treatment and several procedures have been developed, but the risks of recurrence and of impairment of continence still seem to be an unresolved issue. This statement reviews the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in treatment of anal fistula: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of the predictors of failure

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract has gained increasing popularity as a sphincter-sparing technique for complex anal fistula. The present review aimed to investigate the pooled success and complication rates of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract in the published literature and to explore the risk factors for failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant literature search was conducted. Electronic databases were searched in the period of January 2007 through April 2019 for studies that assessed the outcome of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. The main outcomes of the review were the pooled success and complication rates of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, predictors of failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, operation time, hospital stay, and how failures were managed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies comprising 1,378 patients (996 male) were included in this review. The mean age of patients was 42.3 ± 4.2 years. The weighted mean rate of success was 76.5%. The median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. The weighted mean complication rate was 13.9%. The most common complication was wound dehiscence. Fecal incontinence was recorded in 1.4% of patients. Factors that were statistically significantly associated with failure after the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were horseshoe fistulas, fistulas associated with Crohn's disease, and those with a history of previous fistula surgery.

CONCLUSION

The pooled success and complication rates of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were about 76% and 14%, respectively. Horseshoe fistulas, Crohn's disease, and previous fistula surgery were identified as predictors for failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure.

A comparative study on the effectiveness of rectal advancement flap and seton placement surgeries in patients with anal fistula on the rate of recurrence, incontinence and infection

Introduction:

Due to the high prevalence of anal fistulas and the recurrence of the disease following surgery, different methods have been suggested for appropriate treatment of this disease. In this study, the effects of rectal advancement flap surgery and seton placement on the recurrence rate, incontinence and wound infection were compared.

Methods:

In this interventional, prospective and quasi-experimental study, 45 patients with anal fistulas including 28 males and 17 females were studied for 2 years (2015-2017). Patients were divided into two groups and mucosal advancement flap and seton placement techniques were used for each of them. Descriptive analysis of data was performed by SPSS software.

Results:

24 patients (54%) had seton placement surgery and 21 patients (46%) underwent rectal advancement flap surgery. Recurrence was significantly higher in patients who underwent seton placement surgery than the group that underwent rectal advancement flap surgery. Twelve patients (57%) who underwent rectal advancement flap surgery showed improvement in sphincter tone while 11 patients (45%) showed improvements with seton placement.

Conclusion:

The overall results of this study showed that rectal advancement flap surgery reduces recurrence and wound infection more significantly than seton placement in patients with anal fistula.

Risk Factors for Recurrence after anal fistula surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite a burgeoning literature during the last two decades regarding perioperative risk management of anal fistula, little is known about its risk factors that influence postoperative recurrence. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize and assess the credibility of evidence of potential risk factors for anal fistula recurrence (AFR) after surgery.

METHODS

Pubmed and EMBASE without language restriction were searched from inception to April 2018 that reported risk factors which predisposed recurrence after anal fistula surgery. We excluded studies that involved patients with anal fistula associated with Crohn's disease. MOOSE guidelines were followed when this meta-analysis was performed. We used random-effects models to pool relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Evidence from observational studies was graded into high-quality (Class I), moderate-quality (Class II/III) and low-quality (Class IV) based on Egger's P value, total sample size and between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 3514 citations screened, 20 unique observational studies comprising 6168 patients were involved in data synthesis. High-quality evidence showed that AFR was associated with high transsphincteric fistula (RR, 4.77; 95% CI, 3.83 to 5.95), internal opening unidentified (RR, 8.54; 95% CI, 5.29 to 13.80), and horseshoe extensions (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.59). Moderate-quality evidence suggested an association with prior anal surgery (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23), seton placement surgery (RR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.10 to 8.06), and multiple fistula tract (RR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.46 to 15.51). High-quality evidence demonstrated no significant association with gender or smoking; moderate-quality evidence also suggested no association with age, tertiary referral, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus, obesity, preoperative seton drainage, high internal opening, postoperative drainage, mucosal advancement flap surgery, supralevator extensions, location or type of anal fistula.

CONCLUSION

Several patient, surgery and fistula-related factors are significantly associated with postoperative AFR. These findings strengthen clinical awareness of early warning to identify patients with high-risk disease recurrence for AFR.

Perianal fistulas and the lift procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treatment

Background

Treatment of a perianal fistula is difficult due to the risk of fecal incontinence and recurrence. The ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) procedure is a sphincter-saving procedure associated with success rates ranging from 57 to 94%. The aim of our study was to find predictors for a favorable outcome of the LIFT procedure, evaluation of postoperative fecal incontinence, quality of life, and subsequent treatment with long-term follow-up.

Methods

This study was performed in patients who underwent LIFT between 2013 and 2015 at our institution. Their medical data were retrieved from the electronic patient files. The fistula characteristics were described by physical examination, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound, and perioperative evaluation. Recurrence rate, postoperative fecal incontinence, and quality of life were assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM). Thirty-two months later, long-term follow-up including subsequent procedures was evaluated.

Results

Forty-five patients [17 men, mean age 40 years (range 24–67 years)] were included. In 41 (84%) patients, the fistula was classified as complex; 32 (71%) were referrals with a history of previous fistula surgery. The initial success rate was 18 (40%). Only the height of the internal fistula opening (≥ 15 mm p < 0.03) was associated with recurrence. The LIFT procedure did not affect the occurrence of fecal incontinence or soiling. Recurrence showed a trend with a lower PROM (p = 0.07). Twenty-four months later, further surgery leads to cure in 34 (75%), asymptomatic fistulas in 7 (16%), and persisting active fistulas in 4 (9%) patients.

Conclusions

Initial LIFT had a success rate of 40% and with subsequent surgical treatment 75%. Recurrence after LIFT is related to the height of the internal fistula opening and is associated with diminished quality of life. Continence was not affected by initial LIFT.