Does external beam radiation therapy to the pelvis portend worse ileal pouch outcomes? An international multi-institution collaborative study

Surveillance and Management of Dysplasia and Malignancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The paradigm for surveilling and managing inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal dysplasia has changed as high-definition colonoscopy and chromoendoscopy have significantly improved the visualization of dysplasia, and endoscopic mucosal resection has made more lesions endoscopically resectable. However, these patients are at high risk of recurrent dysplasia and cancer and require intensive colonoscopic surveillance. Patients with invisible high-grade dysplasia, invisible multifocal low-grade dysplasia, and colorectal cancer should be considered for surgical resection. Total proctocolectomy removes all at-risk tissue. Subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis can be considered in select patients (ie, advanced age, poor functional status, and with no rectal inflammation or dysplasia).

Pelvic Radiation Therapy Increases Risk of Pouch Failure in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Ileal Pouch

BACKGROUND

The effect of radiation on the ileal pouch is less well studied in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

AIMS

This retrospective study investigates the impact of external radiation therapy on the outcomes of ileal pouches.

METHODS

The study included 82 patients with IBD and ileal pouches, of whom 12 received pelvic radiation, 16 abdominal radiation, 14 radiation in other fields, and 40 served as controls with no radiation. Pouch-related outcomes, including pouch failure, worsening of symptoms, pouchitis, and development of strictures, along with changes in Pouch Disease Activity Index (PDAI) scores pre- and post-radiation were assessed.

RESULTS

The pelvic radiation group exhibited a significantly higher rate of pouch failure (25%, p < 0.004) and worsening pouch-related symptoms (75%, p = 0.012) compared to other groups. Although not statistically significant, a higher incidence of pouchitis was observed in the pelvic radiation group (45.5%, p = 0.071). Strictures were more common in the pelvic radiation group (25%, p = 0.043). Logistic regression analysis revealed that pelvic radiation significantly increased the odds of pouch-related adverse outcomes (OR 5.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.61-21.5).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic radiation significantly impacts the outcomes of ileal pouches in patients with IBD, increasing the risk of pouch failure, symptom exacerbation, and structural complications. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of radiation therapy in this patient population and highlight the importance of closely monitoring and managing radiation-induced pouch dysfunction.

Treatment of Microsatellite-Unstable Rectal Cancer in Sporadic and Hereditary Settings

Microsatellite instability is rare in rectal cancer and associated with younger age of onset and Lynch syndrome. All rectal cancers should be tested for microsatellite instability prior to treatment decisions. Patients with microsatellite instability are relatively resistant to chemotherapy. However, recent small studies have shown dramatic response with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Patients with Lynch syndrome have a hereditary predisposition to cancer and thus an elevated risk of metachronous cancer. Therefore, while "watch and wait" is a well-established practice for sporadic rectal cancers that obtain a complete clinical response after chemoradiation, its safety in patients with Lynch syndrome has not yet been defined. The extent of surgery for patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is controversial and there is significant debate as to the relative advantages of a segmental proctectomy with postoperative endoscopic surveillance versus a therapeutic and prophylactic total proctocolectomy. Surgical decision making for the patient with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is complex and demands a multidisciplinary approach, taking into account both patient- and tumor-specific factors. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy show great promise in the treatment of these patients, and further maturation of data from prospective trials will likely change the current treatment paradigm. Patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer who do not undergo total proctocolectomy require yearly surveillance colonoscopies and should consider chemoprophylaxis with aspirin.

Rectal Cancer and Radiation in Colitis

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. When IBD patients develop a rectal cancer, this should be treated with the same oncological principles and guidelines as the general population. Rectal cancer treatment includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). Many IBD patients will require a total proctocolectomy with an ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and others, restoration of intestinal continuity may not be feasible or advisable. The literature is scarce regarding outcomes of IPAA after RT. In the present review, we will summarize the evidence regarding RT toxicity in IBD patients and review surgical strategies and outcomes of IPAA after RT.

Elective and Emergent Surgery in the Ulcerative Colitis Patient

Ulcerative colitis (UC) requires surgical management in 20 to 30% of patients. Indications for surgery include medically refractory disease, dysplasia, cancer, and other complications of UC. Appropriate patient selection for timing and staging of surgery is paramount for optimal outcomes. Restorative proctocolectomy is the preferred standard of care and can afford many patients with excellent quality of life. There have been significant shifts in the treatment of UC-associated dysplasia, with less patients requiring surgery and more entering surveillance programs. There is ongoing controversy surrounding the management of UC-associated colorectal cancer and the techniques that should be used. This article reviews the most recent literature on the indications for elective and emergent surgical intervention for UC and the considerations behind the surgical options.

Management of pouch neoplasia: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium

Surveillance pouchoscopy is recommended for patients with restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, with the surveillance interval depending on the risk of neoplasia. Neoplasia in patients with ileal pouches mainly have a glandular source and less often are of squamous cell origin. Various grades of neoplasia can occur in the prepouch ileum, pouch body, rectal cuff, anal transition zone, anus, or perianal skin. The main treatment modalities are endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic ablation, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, surgical local excision, surgical circumferential resection and re-anastomosis, and pouch excision. The choice of the treatment modality is determined by the grade, location, size, and features of neoplastic lesions, along with patients' risk of neoplasia and comorbidities, and local endoscopic and surgical expertise.

Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Ulcerative Colitis: Can Pouches Withstand Traditional Treatment Protocols?

BACKGROUND

Anal squamous cell carcinoma has rarely been reported in the setting of ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand the prognosis of anal squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of ulcerative colitis.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective review.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with both ulcerative colitis (556.9/K51.9) and anal squamous cell carcinoma (154.3/C44.520) between January 1, 2000 and August 1, 2019 were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured are treatment and survival of anal squamous cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

Of the 13,499 patients with ulcerative colitis treated, 17 adult patients with ulcerative colitis and anal dysplasia and/or anal squamous cell carcinoma were included in the study: 6 had a diagnosis of anal squamous cell carcinoma, 8 had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 3 had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. There were 4 men (23%) and a median age of 55 years (range, 32-69) years. At diagnosis, 6 had an IPAA, of which 5 had active pouchitis, 1 had an ileorectal anastomosis with active proctitis, 1 had a Hartmann stump with disuse proctitis, 5 had pancolitis, and 4 had left-sided colitis. Of the 6 with anal squamous cell carcinoma, all received 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C with external beam radiation therapy. Four patients had an IPAA, all of whom required intestinal diversion or pouch excision because of treatment intolerance. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 3 patients died: one at 0 months (treatment-related myocardial infarction), one at 60 months (metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma), and one at 129 months (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor); the remaining patients had no residual disease.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited because of its retrospective nature and small number of patients.

CONCLUSION

Anal squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of ulcerative colitis is extremely rare. In the setting of IPAA, diversion may be necessary to prevent radiation intolerance. Careful examination of the perianal region should be performed at the time of surveillance endoscopy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B582.

CARCINOMA ANAL DE CLULAS ESCAMOSAS EN COLITIS ULCEROSA PUEDE EL POUCH MODIFICAR LOS RESULTADOS DE LOS PROTOCOLOS DE TRATAMIENTO TRADICIONAL

ANTECEDENTES:La incidencia de cáncer anal de células escamosas es muy baja en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa.OBJETIVO:Comprender el pronóstico del cáncer anal de células escamosas en el contexto de la colitis ulcerosa.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva.AJUSTE:Centro de referencia.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos con colitis ulcerosa (556.9 / K51.9) y cáncer anal de células escamosas (154.3 / C44.520) entre el 1 de enero de 2000 y el 1 de agosto de 2019.RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:Tratamiento y sobrevida del cáncer anal de células escamosas.RESULTADOS:De 13.499 pacientes en tratamiento por colitis ulcerosa, diecisiete presentaron displasia y/o cáncer de células escamosas: 6 con cáncer, 8 con lesiones intraepiteliales escamosas con displasia de alto grado y 3 con displasia de bajo grado.Cuatro son hombres (23 %) con una mediana de 55 años (rango 32-69). Al realizar el diagnóstico 6 tenían pouch, 5 con pouchitis activa; 1 con ileorecto anastomosis con proctitis activa y 1 con operación de Hartman y muñón con colitis por desuso; además 5 tenían pancolitis y 4 tenían colitis izquierdaTodos los casos con cáncer anal de células escamosas (6 pacientes), fueron tratados con 5-FU mas Mitomicina y radioterapia externa. Cuatro pacientes tenían pouch, todos requirieron derivación intestinal o escisión del pouch por intolerancia al tratamiento.En la mediana de seguimiento de 60 meses, tres pacientes fallecieron: uno a los 0 meses (infarto de miocardio relacionado con el tratamiento), uno a los 60 meses (cáncer de células escamosas metastásico) y uno a los 129 meses (tumor maligno de la vaina del nervio periférico); el resto no presentaba enfermedad residual.LIMITACIONES:Revisión retrospectiva, número pequeño de pacientes.CONCLUSIÓN:El cáncer anal de células escamosas en el contexto de la colitis ulcerosa es extremadamente raro. En el contexto de IPAA, la derivación puede ser necesaria para prevenir la intolerancia a la radiación. Se debe realizar un examen cuidadoso de la región perianal en el momento de la endoscopia de control. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B582.

Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Who Develop Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the USA. Interestingly, recent studies suggest that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing prostate cancer. Importantly, patients with IBD who develop prostate cancer require thoughtful care when using immunosuppressants to treat the IBD in the setting of malignancy. Further, consideration must be given to the proximity of the prostate to the gastrointestinal tract when treating with radiation where there is concern for the effects of inadvertent exposure of radiation to the diseased bowel. In general, management of immunosuppression after diagnosis of prostate cancer is contingent on the specific immunosuppressive agents, the duration of cancer remission and/or plans for cancer treatment, and the potential risks and benefits of stopping or altering the administration of those agents. Concerns that patients with IBD would have increased risk of disease exacerbation and gastrointestinal toxicity have previously limited the use of radiation. While currently no consensus has been reached regarding the safety of radiation therapy in patients with IBD, recent studies suggest that radiation therapy may be used safely in patients with IBD who develop prostate cancer, especially brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy which may have less bowel toxicity compared to conventional methods of external beam radiation therapy. A multidisciplinary team approach including gastroenterologists, urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists should be undertaken to best treat patients with IBD and prostate cancer.