Risk factors associated with unplanned readmission following excisional haemorrhoidectomy

Effectiveness of pudendal nerve block in the management of acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain in Asian individuals using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)

BACKGROUND

Inadequate management of acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain is a major concern. Optimal pain management is necessary to reduce acute postoperative pain and improve care quality. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of postoperative pudendal nerve block (PNB) in reducing acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain in Asian individuals.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analysed 108 adult patients with grade 3 haemorrhoids. Patients with anorectal cancer were excluded from this study. Among the 108 patients, 79 and 29 received spinal anaesthesia (SA) with PNB (SAPNB) and SA alone, respectively. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting were performed to adjust for the effects of confounders.

RESULTS

Patients receiving SAPNB had significantly lower postoperative pain scores 6, 12, and 18 h after haemorrhoidectomy but significantly higher postoperative pain scores 24 and 48 h after haemorrhoidectomy than did patients receiving SA alone. PNB, older age, female sex, reduced operation time, and absence of cardiovascular disease reduced the risk of moderate to severe postoperative pain. Only the addition of PNB was consistently associated with a reduced risk of moderate to severe pain 6, 12, and 18 h after haemorrhoidectomy. Patients receiving SAPNB had significantly lower risks of perianal swelling and urinary retention but a significantly higher risk of nausea than did those receiving SA alone. The two groups exhibited similarity in their rates of postoperative readmission because of poor pain management and their lengths of stay upon readmission.

CONCLUSION

The addition of PNB to SA may effectively reduce acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain.

Risk Factors for Readmission in Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy at a Tertiary Teaching Center

INTRODUCTION

Unplanned readmission is often seen after excisional hemorrhoidectomy. This study aims to explore associations between patient and operative factors, and readmission rates in excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all excisional hemorrhoidectomies performed in Capital and Coast District Health Board for an 8-year period from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome measure was 30-day readmissions post hemorrhoidectomy. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors to readmisson. A decision tree model was designed to further look at the interactions between risk factors.

RESULTS

There were a total 370 patients undergoing 389 excisional hemorrhoidectomies over the study period. There were 47 (12.1%) readmissions. The commonest reasons for readmission were pain (48.9%) and bleeding (38%). 17% of readmitted patients required operative intervention. Readmission was associated with the use of advanced energy devices (OR 2.21; P = 0.027). Trainees were more likely to use advance energy devices than consultants (51% versus 38%, P = 0.010). Consultants were involved in more procedures requiring a removal of 3 pedicles or more than trainees (43% versus 30%, P = 0.010). A decision tree model predicts readmission based on primary operator experience, age, advanced energy device use, and patient ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Two risk models are presented showing the complex relationship between the factors associated with readmission after hemorrhoidectomy. Advanced energy device use was associated with an increased risk of readmission after hemorrhoidectomy in our population. Future work could involve targeted interventions to patients at increased risk of readmission such as preprocedural and postprocedural information, early interval follow-up and targeted analgesia regimes.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Internal Hemorrhoids: A Case Series

Internal hemorrhoids are a common issue in general surgery and are one of the leading causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding globally. Numerous treatment options exist for managing this challenging condition. One relatively new treatment method is radiofrequency ablation for internal hemorrhoids (RAFAELO). According to the limited publications, this method is described as simple, quick, and safe. In this case series, we present five patients with internal hemorrhoids who were treated using the RAFAELO method and discuss their management and outcomes.

The role of the Rafaelo procedure in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of the Rafaelo procedure in the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD).

METHODS

This study was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed (Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) from inception to 25/09/2022. Grey literature databases were also reviewed. The primary endpoint was the pooled complications rate of the Rafaelo procedure in patients with HD. Secondary endpoints included short- (bleeding, pain, thrombosis, necrosis, urinary retention, fever, oedema, anal fissure, and readmission) and long-term (stenosis, meteorism, constipation, anal tags, anal hyposensibility, reoperation, and recurrence) postoperative complication rates. Both prospective and retrospective studies were considered. Quality evaluation was performed via the ROBINS-I tool. Certainty of Evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

RESULTS

Overall, 6 non-randomized studies and 327 patients were included. The overall complication rate was 17.6% (95% CI 8.8-26.3%). Short-term complications were bleeding (7.5%, 95% CI 2.5-12.5%), thrombosis (2.2%, 95% CI 0.4-4.8%), and pain (1.6%, 95% CI 0.2-3.3%). Reoperation and recurrence rates were 1.8% (95% CI 0.3-3.4%) and 4.8% (95% CI 1.2-8.4%), respectively. A significant improvement in the presenting symptoms was noted. Method approval and patient satisfaction rates were 89.1% (95% CI 81.7-96.6%) and 95% (95% CI 89.8-100%), correspondingly. Overall CoE was "Very Low".

CONCLUSIONS

Further randomized controlled trials are required to delineate the exact role of the Rafaelo procedure in HD.

Secondary bleeding following proctological surgery: Rare but potentially severe

PURPOSE

Haemorrhage following proctological surgery is one of the complications with the greatest potential for severity. The aim of this work was to assess the frequency and risk factors of haemorrhage requiring hospitalization during 30-days postoperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review of all surgeries performed in a Parisian department of medico-surgical proctology between January 2016 and June 2018 was performed. Demographic and surgical data were collected for patients who were hospitalized for postoperative haemorrhage. Their analysis was conducted as a single analysis followed by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 7533 surgeries were performed on 6727 patients. The mean patient age was 42.6 (±14.3) years and 67.2% were males. Postoperative haemorrhage occurred in 111 patients (1.5%) with a total of 123 haemorrhagic episodes (12 relapses) within a mean of 6 (±5.5) days. In therapeutic terms, 28.5% of haemorrhages required transfusion, 37.4% required haemostasis in the operating theatre and 14.6% required haemostasis under local anaesthesia. Using multivariate analysis, haemorrhage was more frequent after haemorrhoid surgery and in the case of anticoagulant treatment, particularly direct oral anticoagulants, and if the ASA score was equal to 3. Active smoking was associated with a decreased risk of haemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Haemorrhage requiring hospitalization occurred in 1.5% of cases following proctological surgery, 52.8% were severe and recurred in 10.8% of cases. The study also specified certain risk factors for haemorrhage and demonstrated the protective effect of active smoking.