MUTYH-associated polyposis - colorectal phenotype and management

Phenotype Correlations With Pathogenic DNA Variants in the MUTYH Gene: A Review of Over 2000 Cases

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive disorder where the inheritance of constitutional biallelic pathogenic MUTYH variants predisposes a person to the development of adenomas and colorectal cancer (CRC). It is also associated with extracolonic and extraintestinal manifestations that may overlap with the phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Currently, there are discrepancies in the literature regarding whether certain phenotypes are truly associated with MAP. This narrative review is aimed at exploring the phenotypic spectrum of MAP to better characterize the MAP phenotype. Literature search was conducted to identify articles reporting on MAP-specific phenotypes. Clinical data from 2109 MAP patients identified from the literature showed that 1123 patients (53.2%) had CRC. Some patients with CRC had no associated adenomas, suggesting that adenomas are not an obligatory component of MAP. Carriers of the two missense founder variants, and possibly truncating variants, had an increased cancer risk when compared to those who carry other pathogenic variants. It has been suggested that somatic G:C > T:A transversions are a mutational signature of MAP and could be used as a biomarker in screening and identifying patients with atypical MAP, or in associating certain phenotypes with MAP. The extracolonic and extraintestinal manifestations that have been associated with MAP include duodenal adenomas, duodenal cancer, fundic gland polyps, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer, and skin cancer. The association of breast cancer and endometrial cancer with MAP remains disputed. Desmoid tumors and congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPEs) are rarely reported in MAP but have long been seen in FAP patients and thus could act as a distinguishing feature between the two. This collection of MAP phenotypes will assist in the assessment of pathogenic MUTYH variants using the American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) Variant Interpretation Guidelines and ultimately improve patient care.

Hereditary Gastrointestinal Tumor Syndromes: When Risk Comes with Your Genes

Despite recent campaigns for screening and the latest advances in cancer therapy and molecular biology, gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms remain among the most frequent and lethal human tumors. Most GI neoplasms are sporadic, but there are some well-known familial syndromes associated with a significant risk of developing both benign and malignant GI tumors. Although some of these entities were described more than a century ago based on clinical grounds, the increasing molecular information obtained with high-throughput techniques has shed light on the pathogenesis of several of them. The vast amount of information gained from next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of some high-risk genetic variants, although others remain to be discovered. The opportunity for genetic assessment and counseling in these families has dramatically changed the management of these syndromes, though it has also resulted in significant psychological distress for the affected patients, especially those with indeterminate variants. Herein, we aim to summarize the most relevant hereditary cancer syndromes involving the stomach and colon, with an emphasis on new molecular findings, novel entities, and recent changes in the management of these patients.

Phenotype correlations with pathogenic DNA variants in the MUTYH gene

MUTYH -associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive disorder where the inheritance of constitutional biallelic pathogenic MUTYH variants predisposes a person to the development of adenomas and colorectal cancer (CRC). It is also associated with extracolonic and extraintestinal manifestations that may overlap with the phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Currently, there are discrepancies in the literature regarding whether certain phenotypes are truly associated with MAP. This narrative review aims to explore the phenotypic spectrum of MAP to better characterise the MAP phenotype. A literature search was conducted to identify articles reporting on MAP-specific phenotypes. Clinical data from 2109 MAP patients identified from the literature showed that 1123 patients (53.2%) had CRC. Some patients with CRC had no associated adenomas, suggesting that adenomas are not an obligatory component of MAP. Carriers of the two missense founder variants, and possibly truncating variants, had an increased cancer risk when compared to those who carry other pathogenic variants. It has been suggested that somatic G:C>T:A transversions are a mutational signature of MAP, and could be used as a biomarker in screening and identifying patients with atypical MAP, or in associating certain phenotypes with MAP. The extracolonic and extraintestinal manifestations that have been associated with MAP include duodenal adenomas, duodenal cancer, fundic gland polyps, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer and skin cancer. The association of breast cancer and endometrial cancer with MAP remains disputed. Desmoids and Congenital Hypertrophy of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium (CHRPEs) are rarely reported in MAP, but have long been seen in FAP patients, and thus could act as a distinguishing feature between the two. This collection of MAP phenotypes will assist in the assessment of pathogenic MUTYH variants using the American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) Variant Interpretation Guidelines, and ultimately improve patient care.

The Diagnostic Yield of Genetic Testing in Patients With Multiple Colorectal Adenomas: A Specialist Center Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Adenoma multiplicity is associated with increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The utility of genetic testing in patients with multiple colorectal adenomas (MCRA) remains uncertain. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of mutations in polyposis- and CRC-associated genes in patients with MCRA.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional review of adult patients with 10-99 cumulative adenomas from the prospective database at the St Mark's Hospital Polyposis Registry and Family Cancer Clinic between 1999 and 2021. Genetic testing was performed for adenomatous polyposis-associated genes, hamartomatous polyposis-associated genes, and nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-associated genes. Clinicopathological outcomes were extracted for multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-nine patients with MCRA (median age 61 [interquartile range 53-69] years) were identified. Sixty-six patients (25.5%) had a pathogenic variant or likely pathogenic variant, with APC and biallelic MUTYH mutations constituting the majority of identified pathogenic variant/likely pathogenic variants. Diagnostic yields were greater than 10% at any adenoma burden. In univariate analysis, higher adenoma burden and younger age were associated with higher yield (both P < 0.0001). In patients with MCRA with 10-19 adenomas without a relevant personal or family history of CRC, the diagnostic yield was nil. In multiple logistic regression analysis, higher adenoma burden, younger age, personal history of CRC, and first-degree familial history of CRC were associated with higher diagnostic yield.

DISCUSSION

Diagnostic yield of >10% at any adenoma burden supports current guidance for constitutional genetic testing in patients with MCRA, although the low yield in people older than 60 years with 10-19 adenomas suggests that a stratified approach might be appropriate.

Low adenoma burden in unselected patients with a pathogenic APC variant

PURPOSE

Genomic screening can improve clinical outcomes, but presentation of individuals with risk for polyposis identified via genomic screening is unknown. To inform assessment of clinical utility of genomic screening for polyposis risk, clinical presentation of individuals in an unselected health care system cohort with an APC pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant causative of familial adenomatous polyposis are described.

METHODS

Electronic health records of individuals with an APC P/LP variant identified via the MyCode program (MyCode APC+) were reviewed to assess adenoma burden and compare it among individuals with a clinical diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis and matched variant-negative controls.

RESULTS

The prevalence of APC P/LP variants in this health care cohort is estimated to be 1 in 2800. Twenty-four MyCode APC+ individuals were identified during the study period. Median age at result disclosure was 53 years. Rate of clinical polyposis was 8%. Two of six participants with a classic region variant and none of those with an attenuated region variant had polyposis. MyCode APC+ participants did not differ from controls in cumulative adenoma count.

CONCLUSION

APC P/LP variant prevalence estimate in the MyCode cohort is higher than prior published prevalence rates. Individuals with APC P/LP variants identified via genomic screening had a low adenoma burden.

[Results of Endoscopic Screening and Therapy of the Duodenum in MUTYH-associated Polyposis]

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is a very rare autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome. It is caused by a homozygous or compound heterozygous germline mutation in the MUTYH gene. MAP is characterised by numerous colorectal adenomas; furthermore there is an increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the phenotype can be highly variable; for example, affected individuals also have an increased risk of polyps of the upper gastrointestinal tract and development of duodenal carcinomas.This study included 15 patients with evidence of a pathogenic MUTYH variant, who were screened at the National Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) results were prospectively recorded in a database from 2012 to 2023.At least one EGD (median 4, range 1-15) was performed in 15 patients, seven of whom carried a homozygous and 8 a compound heterozygous pathogenic MUTYH variant. The median surveillance period was 115 months (range, 3-215 months). The median age at baseline was 44 (range 17-65) years. A total of 72 EGDs were performed (median 4; range 1-15). Five patients had duodenal adenomas; histology showed tubular adenomas with low grade intraepithelial dysplasia (LGIEN) in all of these cases. The total number of duodenal adenomas detected was 48, and the median number was 3 (range, 1-37). Neither high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIEN) nor duodenal cancer was detected during the surveillance period.Patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis should be managed in a multidisciplinary centre for hereditary tumour disease. Our cohort showed more patients with duodenal adenomas than in previously published data. However, no progression to HGIEN or duodenal carcinomas was observed as a result of the endoscopic therapy performed.

MUTYH-associated polyposis: Is it time to change upper gastrointestinal surveillance? A single-center case series and a literature overview

BACKGROUND

The presence of Spigelman stage (SS) IV duodenal polyposis is considered the most significant risk factor for duodenal cancer in patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). However, advanced SS disease is rarely reported in MAP patients, and no clear recommendations on small bowel (SB) surveillance have been proposed in this patient setting.

AIM

To research more because that case reports of duodenal cancers in MAP suggest that they may develop in the absence of advanced benign SS disease and often involve the distal portion of the duodenum.

METHODS

We describe a series of MAP patients followed up at the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome (Italy). A literature overview on previously reported SB cancers in MAP is also provided.

RESULTS

We identified two (6%) SB adenocarcinomas with no previous history of duodenal polyposis. Our observations, supported by literature evidence, suggest that the formula for staging duodenal polyposis and predicting risk factors for distal duodenum and jejunal cancer may need to be adjusted to take this into account rather than focusing solely on the presence or absence of SS IV disease.

CONCLUSION

Our study emphasizes the need for further studies to define appropriate upper gastrointestinal surveillance programs in MAP patients.