Ano-rectovaginal fistula after obstetrical anal sphincter injury: Diverting stoma does not improve the surgical results

Sphincter repair procedures may be favored in the treatment of obstetrical recto-vaginal fistula: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of obstetric rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is challenging for the surgeon. The best surgical procedure to repair RVFs, specifically after obstetric anal sphincter injury, has not been extensively studied. The objective was to compare the success of the different procedures performed to repair obstetric RVF.

METHODS

The literature search was carried out on PubMed® and Web of Science® from database inception until 31 December 2022. Selection criteria were: (1) patients with a diagnosis of obstetric-related RVF; (2) patients treated surgically with no restriction concerning the considered surgery; (3) clinical trials or epidemiological studies. Meta-analysis was conducted considering the network meta-analysis framework to allow studying the relative value of each treatment mentioned in the selected articles.

RESULTS

The quantitative synthesis included 32 studies (18 retrospective and 14 prospective) accounting for 595 patients. The quality of these studies was low because of the lack of prospective randomization. Nineteen procedure types were described and assessed. Most patients (n = 180) underwent endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) followed by excision and layered closure (ELC) (n = 213) and Musset procedure (n = 65). A diverting stoma was performed in 66/132 patients. Only 13 studies reported the functional results of the procedure. In the meta-analysis, the Musset procedure (OR = 4.29; 95% CI: 1.18-16.14), transvaginal ELC (OR = 11.84; 95% CI: 2.18-91.80) and transperineal ELC (OR = 3.56; 95% CI: 1.26-10) significantly improved the anatomical results compared to ERAF.

CONCLUSIONS

A further randomized controlled trial in the literature assessing ERAF and sphincteroplasty to compare the anatomical results, functional results and morbidity of this treatment is needed.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023447875.

[Rectovaginal fistulas : Differentiated diagnostics and treatment]

Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) represent less than 5% of anorectal fistulas. The classification of RVF is based on the localization (low vs. high) and the etiology. The most frequent causes of RVF are birth trauma, Crohn's disease, previous surgery and pelvic irradiation. In most cases a clinical diagnostic assessment is sufficient. Additionally, endosonography is a reliable tool to detect sphincter defects. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are reserved for special situations (e.g., RVF related to anastomotic leakage, after pelvic irradiation or associated with complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease). The surgical treatment is primarily oriented to the localization and etiology. Surgical techniques range from local procedures (e.g., endorectal advancement flap repair, transvaginal or transperineal closure) up to more invasive tissue interposition (e.g., bulbocavernosus muscle fat tissue flap or transposition of the gracilis muscle). In "high" RVF transabdominal approaches such as coloanal anastomosis, pull through procedures or omental interposition are indicated. All surgical procedures show high recurrence rates. Several operations are mostly necessary and a stoma creation is often required.

Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: stoma may not be necessary-a French retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Postoperative rectovaginal fistula leads to a loss of patients' quality of life and presents significant challenges to the surgeon. The literature focusing specifically on postoperative rectovaginal fistulas is limited. The objective of the present study is to identify factors that can enhance the success of the management of this postoperative rectovaginal fistula.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric study included all patients undergoing surgery for rectovaginal fistulas, excluding those for whom the etiology of rectovaginal fistula was not postoperative. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients with postsurgical fistulas were identified, of whom 70 were successfully treated, giving a success rate of 85.4%. On average, these patients required 3.04 ± 2.72 interventions. The creation of a diversion stoma did not increase the success rate of management [odds ratio (OR) = 0.488; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.107-2.220]. Among the 217 procedures performed, 69 were successful, accounting for a 31.8% success rate. The number of interventions and the creation of a diversion stoma did not correlate with the success of management. However, direct coloanal anastomosis was significantly associated with success (OR = 35.06; 95% CI 1.271-997.603; p = 0.036) as compared with endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). Other procedures such as Martius flap did not show a significantly higher success rate.

CONCLUSION

The creation of a diversion stoma is not necessary in closing a fistula. ERAF should be considered as a first-line treatment prior to proposing more invasive approach such as direct coloanal anastomosis.

Martius flaps for low rectovaginal fistulae: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal fistulae (RVF) are notoriously challenging to treat. Martius flap (MF) is a technique employed to manage RVF, among various others, with none being universally successful. We aimed to assess the outcomes of RVF managed with MF interposition.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis searching for all studies specifically reporting on the outcomes of MF for RVF was performed. The primary objective was the mean success rate, whilst secondary objectives included complications and recurrence. The MedCalc software (version 20.118) was used to conduct proportional meta-analyses of data. Weighted mean values with 95% CI are presented and stratified according to aetiology where possible.

RESULTS

Twelve non-randomized (11 retrospective, 1 prospective) studies, assessing 137 MF were included. The mean age of the study population was 42.4 (±15.7), years. There were 44 primary and 93 recurrent RVF. The weighted mean success rate for MF when performed for primary RVF was 91.4% (95% CI: 79.45-98.46; I2 = 32.1%; P = 0.183) and that for recurrent RVF was 77.5% (95% CI: 62.24-89.67; I2 = 58.1%; P = 0.008). The weighted mean complication rate was 29% (95% CI: 8.98-54.68; I2 = 85.4%; P < 0.0001) and the overall recurrence rate was 12.0% (95% CI: 5.03-21.93; I2 = 52.3%; P = 0.021). When purely radiotherapy-induced RVF were evaluated, the mean overall success rate was 94.6% (95% CI: 83.33-99.75; I2 = 0%; P = 0.350).

CONCLUSIONS

MF interposition appears to be more effective for primary than recurrent RVF. However, the poor quality of the data limits definitive conclusions being drawn and demands further assessment with randomized studies.

Rectovaginal Fistula: What Is the Role of Martius Flap and Gracilis Muscle Interposition in the Therapeutic Strategy?

BACKGROUND

Although numerous treatments exist for the management of rectovaginal fistula, none has demonstrated its superiority. The role of diverting stoma remains controversial. A few series include Martius flap in the armamentarium.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the role of gracilis muscle interposition and Martius flap in the surgical management of rectovaginal fistula.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of a pooled prospectively maintained database from 3 centers.

PATIENTS

All consecutive eligible patients with rectovaginal fistula undergoing Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition were included from 2001 to 2022.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success was defined by the absence of stoma and rectovaginal fistula.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included with 55 Martius flap and 24 gracilis muscle interposition performed after failures of 164 initial procedures. Total length of stay was longer for gracilis muscle interposition by 2 days ( p = 0.01) without a significant difference in severe morbidity (20% vs 12%, p = 0.53). Twenty-seven percent of the Martius flap interpositions were performed without a stoma, which did not have an impact on overall morbidity ( p = 0.763). Per patient immediate success rates were not significantly different between groups (35% vs 31%, p > 0.99). The success of gracilis muscle interposition after the failure of the Martius flap was not significantly different from an initial gracilis muscle interposition ( p > 0.99). After simple perineal procedures, the immediate success rate rose to 49.4% (49% vs 50%, p > 0.99). After a median follow-up of 23 months, no significant difference was detected in success rate between the 2 procedures (69% vs 69%, p > 0.99). Smoking was the only negative predictive factor ( p = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS

By its retrospective nature, this study is limited in its comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel comparison between Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition suggests that Martius flap presents several advantages, including shorter length of stay, similar morbidity, and similar success rate. Proximal diversion via a stoma for Martius flap does not appear mandatory. Gracilis muscle interposition could be reserved as a salvage procedure after Martius flap failure. See Video Abstract .

FSTULA RECTOVAGINAL CUL ES EL ROL DEL COLGAJO DE MARTIUS Y LA INTERPOSICIN DEL MSCULO GRACILIS EN LA ESTRATEGIA TERAPUTICA

ANTECEDENTES:Si bien existen numerosos tratamientos para el manejo de la fistula rectovaginal, ninguno ha demostrado su superioridad. El papel del estoma de derivación sigue siendo controvertido. Pocas series incluyen colgajo de Martius en el armamento.OBJETIVO:Determinar el rol de la interposición del músculo gracilis y del colgajo de Martius, en el manejo quirúrgico de la fístula rectovaginal.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente en 3 centros.AJUSTES/PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes elegibles consecutivos con fistula rectovaginal sometidos a colgajo de Martius y la interposición del músculo gracilis desde 2001 hasta 2022.RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:El éxito se definió por la ausencia de estoma y fistula rectovaginal.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 62 pacientes con 55 colgajo de Martius y 24 con interposición del músculo gracilis realizados después de fracasos de 164 procedimientos iniciales. La duración total de la estancia hospitalaria fue dos días más larga para la interposición del músculo gracilis ( p = 0,01) sin una diferencia significativa en la morbilidad grave (20% frente a 12%, p = 0,53). El 27% de los colgajos de Martius se realizaron sin estoma, sin impacto en la morbilidad global ( p = 0,763). Las tasas de éxito inmediato por paciente no fueron significativamente diferentes entre los grupos (35% vs. 31%, p = 1,0). El éxito de la interposición del músculo gracilis después del fracaso del colgajo de Martius no fue significativamente diferente de una interposición del músculo gracilis inicial (p = 1,0). La tasa de éxito inmediato aumentó al 49,4% (49% frente a 50%, p = 1,0) después de procedimientos perineales simples. Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 23 meses, no se detectaron diferencias significativas en la tasa de éxito entre los dos procedimientos (69 % frente a 69 %, p = 1,0). El tabaquismo fue el único factor predictivo negativo ( p = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Por su naturaleza retrospectiva, este estudio tiene limitaciones en su comparación.CONCLUSIÓN:Esta novedosa comparación entre colgajo de Martius y la interposición del músculo gracilis sugiere que el colgajo de Martius presenta varias ventajas, incluida una estancia prolongada más corta, una morbilidad similar y un éxito. La derivación proximal a través de un estoma para el colgajo de Martius no parece obligatoria. La interposición del músculo gracilis podría reservarse como procedimiento de rescate después de una falla de colgajo de Martius. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez ).

Delayed surgical management of rectovaginal fistula: a case report highlighting challenges and lessons learned

Background

Rectovaginal fistulas following an obstetric anal sphincter injury's repair are rare in developed country and their management could be challenging, particularly in cases of delayed repair. This study emphasizes the importance of accurately diagnosing and promptly repairing such fistulas for optimal patient well-being.

Case

A 30-year-old patient presented with gas incontinence and a greenish discharge from the vagina, 6 months after delivering her baby. Examination revealed a small pinhole lesion on the posterior vaginal wall, and an endoanal ultrasound confirmed the presence of a rectovaginal fistula. Surgical repair was delayed for 9 months due to the patient's breastfeeding. The fistula was eventually repaired through a transrectal approach, with excision of the fistulous tract and closure of both the rectum and vagina. A laparoscopic protective ileostomy was also performed due to the delayed repair. However, a recurrence of the fistula was detected 8 months later, requiring a second repair. The patient underwent physiotherapy for the anal sphincter and achieved optimal sphincter function. After 6 months, the ileostomy was successfully closed, and the patient remained continent.

Conclusions

This case highlights the importance of early recognition and prompt repair of rectovaginal fistulas following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Delayed repairs pose greater challenges and increase the risk of recurrence. Individualized surgical approaches, skilled pelvic floor repair, and a multidisciplinary approach are crucial for successful outcomes. This case underscores the need for careful planning and consideration of patient characteristics in the management of rectovaginal fistulas, aiming to achieve optimal outcomes and patient well-being.