The multi-ethnic global lung initiative 2012 and Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reference values do not reflect spirometric measurements in Black boys and men from Tanzania

Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Spirometry is a commonly used lung function test. It assesses respiratory functions by measuring the air volume and the rate at which a person can exhale from lungs filled to their total capacity. The most helpful spirometry parameters are: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Pregnancy derives an altered physiological state due to hormonal and anatomical changes that affect the respiratory system. Despite that, spirometry is less commonly done during pregnancy, and if done, test results are evaluated against non-pregnancy references.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore spirometry profiles in pregnant and non-pregnant women and describe their differences.

METHODOLOGY

This cross-sectional study involved age-matched pregnant and non-pregnant participants recruited from Mnazi Moja ANC and Muhimbili University (MUHAS). A digital spirometer was used to assess respiratory function. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23. The mean spirometry values of pregnant participants were compared to those of non-pregnant participants using an independent sample t-test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study included 92 pregnant and 98 non-pregnant participants subjected to spirometry. Both FVC and FEV1 values were significantly lower in pregnant than in non-pregnant participants (2.7 ± 0.5 L vs. 2.9 ± 0.5 L; p < 0.01 and 2.2 ± 0.4 L vs. 2.5 ± 0.4 L; p < 0.01 respectively). In addition, pregnant participants had significantly lower mean PEF values than their non-pregnant counterparts (303 ± 84 L/min versus 353 ± 64 L/min; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Spirometry test values are lower in pregnancy than in non-pregnant participants.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Interpreting the spirometry test values of pregnant women using references obtained from non-pregnant women may be inappropriate. Future studies should evaluate the appropriateness of predicting spirometry values of pregnant women using reference equations derived from non-pregnant women.

Spirometric reference equations for Cameroonians aged 4 to 89 years derived using lambda, mu, sigma (LMS) method

Background

Spirometric reference values are well known in several ethnic groups but the normative spirometric values of blacks living in Africa have been less studied. The purpose of this study is to establish normative spirometric equations from a representative population of Cameroonian children and adults and compare these equations with those developed by the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) and in Nigerians.

Methods

Spirometric data from healthy Cameroonians aged 4–89 years randomly collected between 2014 and 2018 were used to derive reference equations using generalized additive model for location (mu), shape (lambda) and scale (sigma).

Results

A total of 625 children and adolescents (290 males and 335 females) and 1152 adults (552 males and 600 females) were included in the study. The prediction equation for spirometric index was written as: M = Exp[a0 + a1*ln (Height) + a2*ln (Age) + Mspline, Mspline was age related spline contribution]. Applying the GLI standards for African Americans resulted in overall values greater than those found in our study for forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). These values were very close in children and adolescents while the values obtained with the GLI equations for African Americans were significantly higher in adults. FEV1/FVC ratio in our study was similar for adult males but lower in adult females (88% vs 85%, difference =  + 3.5%) when applying Nigerian standards.

Conclusions

FEV1 and FVC of the Cameroonian infant and adolescent population are very close to those of black Americans. However, FEV1 and FVC of Cameroonian adults are significantly lower than those of black American adults. These equations should allow a more suitable interpretation of spirometry in the Cameroonian population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01705-1.

Reference Values and Related Factors for Peak Expiratory Flow in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese

Background: Peak expiratory flow (PEF), as an essential index used for screening and monitoring asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory mortality especially in the elderly, is recommended for low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries. However, few studies have focused on the reference of PEF in China, especially in middle-aged and elderly people. Thus, this study aimed to determine age- and sex-specific reference values of PEF in the middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. Methods: There were 8,914 participants who were included for risk factor analysis and 5,498 participants included for reference value analysis. The PEF was measured using a peak flow meter in liters per minute. The distributions of standardized PEF terciles stratified by sex and age were reported. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the associations between risk factors and PEF. Results: The PEF was higher in men than women across all age subgroups. The value of PEF decreased with age in both men and women. Height, weight, handgrip strength, and residence in rural were positively associated with PEF. Age and smoking status were negatively associated with PEF significantly in both men and women (P < 0.05). The mean PEF values were 367.10 and 253.00 L/min for men and women, respectively. Meanwhile, the prevalence of low PEF was 3.94 and 3.32% for men and women, respectively. Conclusions: Age- and sex-specific centiles of standardized PEF for the middle-aged and elderly Chinese population were estimated. The reference values for low PEF could provide reference standards for epidemiological studies and clinical practices in the future. Interventions to improve lung functions or to prevent respiratory disease should be paid more attention to factors associated with PEF.

Lung function parameters among Australian Aboriginal 'apparently healthy' adults: an Australian Caucasian and Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) various ethnic norms comparative study

Background: There is sparse literature evidence evaluating the applicability of the GLI-2012 spirometric norms for Australian Aboriginal adults.Methods: Lung function parameters (LFPs) were compared between Australian Aboriginal and Australian Caucasians, and the fit of Australian Aboriginals LFPs with various ethnic GLI equations was tested.Results: Of 1350 and 5634 Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in Australian Aboriginal and Australian Caucasian adults, 153 and 208 PFTs matched for anthropometrics and normal chest radiology, respectively. Absolute FVC and FEV₁ values were 20% lower in Australian Aboriginals compared to Australian Caucasians. Differences remained significant after accounting for age, sex, height, weight and smoking status in multivariate regression (FVC -0.84 L (-0.98, -0.71), FEV₁ - 0.72 L (-0.84, -0.59), but with nearly preserved FEV₁/FVC. GLI-2012 transformation resulted in z-scores significantly below zero for each of FVC, FEV₁ and FEV₁/FVC with z-scores ranging from -4.52 (-4.87, -4.16) for North East Asian FVC transformation for males, to -0.34 (-0.73, 0.05) for Black FVC transformation for females.Conclusions: Australian Aboriginal adults had 20% lower values for FVC and FEV₁ but nearly preserved absolute FEV₁/FVC in comparison to Australian Caucasians. The GLI-2012 spirometric norms do not appear to fit for Australian Aboriginal adults regardless of which ethnicity options selected, including 'others/mixed'.

Global Lung Function Initiative-2012 'other/mixed' spirometry reference equation provides the best overall fit for Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children and young adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ethnic-specific reference equations are recommended when performing spirometry. In the absence of appropriate reference equations for Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders (Indigenous), we determined whether any of the existing Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI)-2012 equations were suitable for use in Indigenous children/young adults.

METHODS

We performed spirometry on 1278 participants (3-25 years) who were identified as Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander or 'both'. Questionnaires and medical records were used to identify 'healthy' participants. GLI2012_DataConversion software was used to apply the 'Caucasian', 'African-American' and 'other/mixed' equations.

RESULTS

We included 930 healthy participants. Mean z-scores for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁ ) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were lower than the Caucasian predicted values (range: -0.53 to -0.60) and higher than African-American (range: 0.70 to 0.78) but similar to other/mixed (range: 0.00 to 0.08). The distribution of healthy participants around the upper and lower limits of normal (~5%) fit well for the other/mixed equation compared to the Caucasian and African-American equations.

CONCLUSION

Of the available GLI-2012 reference equations, the other/mixed reference equation provides the best overall fit for Indigenous Australian children and young adults (3-25 years). Healthy data from additional communities and adults around Australia will be required to confirm generalizability of findings.

The multi-ethnic global lung initiative 2012 (GLI-2012) norms reflect contemporary adult's Algerian spirometry

Background

The validation of the multi-ethnic GLI-2012 spirometric norms has been debated in several countries. However, its applicability in Algeria has not been verified.

Aim

To ascertain how well the GLI-2012 norms fit contemporary adult Algerian spirometric data.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of 300 healthy non-smoker adults (50% men, age range: 18–85 years) recruited from the Algiers region general population. All participants underwent a clinical examination and a plethysmography measurement. Z-scores for some spirometric data [FEV₁, FVC, FEV₁/FVC and forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC (FEF_25-75%)] were calculated. If the average Z-score deviated by “< ± 0.5” from the overall mean, the GLI-2012 norms would be considered as reflective of contemporary Algerian spirometry.

Results

The means±SDs of age, height, weight, FVC, FEV₁, FEV₁/FVC and FEF_25-75% of the participants were, respectively, 48±17 years, 1.65±0.10 m, 73±14 kg, 4.04±1.04 L, 3.18±0.82 L, 0.79±0.05 and 4.09±1.09 L/s. Almost the quarter of participants were obese. The total sample means±SDs Z-scores were 0.22±0.87 for FVC, 0.04±0.88 for FEV₁, -0.34±0.67 for FEV₁/FVC and 0.93±0.79 for FEF_25-75%. For men and women, only the means±SDs of the FEF_25-75% Z-scores exceeded the threshold of “± 0.5”, respectively, 1.13±0.77 and 0.73±0.76.

Conclusion

Results of the present study, performed in an Algerian population of healthy non-smoking adults, supported the applicability of the GLI-2012 norms to interpret FEV₁, FVC and FEV₁/FVC but not the FEF_25-75%.