Complement C3F allotype synthesized by liver recipient modifies transplantation outcome independently from donor hepatic C3

Understanding immunological insights of liver transplantation: a practice for attaining operational tolerance

Liver transplantation has been at the forefront of medical research, with efforts concentrated on understanding the intricate cellular and molecular dynamics involved this complex procedure. This body of work has chronicled critical clinical advancements, identified challenges, and highlighted progressive improvements in surgical practices. These concerted efforts have significantly contributed to the evolution and enhancement of liver transplantation, elevating it to its current level of sophistication. A successful liver transplant now demands an integrated, multidisciplinary approach that includes not only expanding the donor pool from deceased to living donors but also embracing advances in surgical methods, efficiently managing post-transplant complications, and, importantly, achieving operational tolerance. The latter, operational tolerance, is a state wherein the recipient's immune system is coaxed into accepting the transplanted organ without the long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs, thereby minimizing potential side effects, and improving quality of life. Understanding the critical immune mechanisms that aim to prevent graft rejection is essential from an immunological perspective. This review aims to highlight the crucial areas of host versus graft immune responses, making a clear distinction between organs received from living and deceased donors. It examines how these immune responses, both innate and adaptive, are initiated and proposes the exploration of molecular docking sites as a strategy to curb unwanted immune reactions. Additionally, this review explores the promising potential of biomarkers in predicting graft rejection, and emphasizes the importance of achieving tolerance and the continuous quest for innovative strategies to enhance the success and longevity of liver transplants.

Impaired complement regulation drives chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation

A greater understanding of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) pathobiology, the primary cause of mortality after lung transplantation, is needed to improve outcomes. The complement system links innate to adaptive immune responses and is activated early post-lung transplantation to form the C3 convertase, a critical enzyme that cleaves the central complement component C3. We hypothesized that LTx recipients with a genetic predisposition to enhanced complement activation have worse CLAD-free survival mediated through increased adaptive alloimmunity. We interrogated a known functional C3 polymorphism (C3R102G) that increases complement activation through impaired C3 convertase inactivation in two independent LTx recipient cohorts. C3R102G, identified in at least one out of three LTx recipients, was associated with worse CLAD-free survival, particularly in the subset of recipients who developed donor-specific antibodies (DSA). In a mouse orthotopic lung transplantation model, impaired recipient complement regulation resulted in more severe obstructive airway lesions when compared to wildtype controls, despite only moderate differences in graft-infiltrating effector T cells. Impaired complement regulation promoted the intragraft accumulation of memory B cells and antibody-secreting cells, resulting in increased DSA levels. In summary, genetic predisposition to complement activation is associated with B cell activation and worse CLAD-free survival.

The Influence of Donor and Recipient Complement C3 Polymorphisms on Liver Transplant Outcome

Despite early reports of an impact of complement C3 polymorphism on liver transplant patient and graft survival, subsequent evidence has been conflicting. Our aim was to clarify the contributions of donor and recipient C3 genotype, separately and together, on patient and graft outcomes and acute rejection incidence in liver transplant recipients. Eight donor/recipient groups were analyzed according to their genotype and presence or absence of C3 F allele (FFFS, FFSS, FSFF, FSFS, FSSS, SSFF, SSFS, and SSSS) and correlated with clinical outcomes of patient survival, graft survival, and rejection. The further impact of brain death vs. circulatory death during liver donation was also considered. Over a median 5.3 y follow-up of 506 patients with clinical information and matching donor and recipient tissue, five-year patient and graft survival (95% confidence interval) were 90(81-91)% and 77(73-85)%, respectively, and 72(69-94)% were rejection-free. Early disadvantages to patient survival were associated with donor C3 F variant, especially in brain-death donors. Recipient C3 genotype was an independent determinant of graft survival by Cox proportional hazards analysis (hazard ratio 0.26, P = 0.04), and the C3 F donor variant was again associated with worse liver graft survival, particularly in brain-death donors. C3 genotype did not independently determine rejection incidence, but a greater proportion of recipient C3 F carriers were rejection-free in the circulatory death, but not the brain-death cohort. Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed significant effects of acute rejection on patient survival (hazard ratio 0.24, P = 0.018), of retransplantation on rejection risk (hazard ratio 6.3, P = 0.009), and of donor type (circulatory-death vs. brain-death) on rejection incidence (hazard ratio 4.9, P = 0.005). We conclude that both donor and recipient complement C3 genotype may influence patient and graft outcomes after liver transplantation but that the type of liver donor is additionally influential, possibly via the inflammatory environment of the transplant.

The implication of genetic variation in the complement C3 allotypes on the first-year allograft outcome after live donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The component (C3) of the complement system constitutes a central element in liver transplantation. C3 is produced mainly by the liver and comprises both slow (C3-S), and fast (C3-F) components.

METHODS

The effect of a single nucleotide variation in the C3 gene on the first-year outcome examined by ARMS PCR in 30 recipients of living donor allograft.

RESULTS

Frequencies of C3-S and C3-F in the Egyptian recipients' population were 67% and 33%. C3-F allele frequency was prevalent than the C3-S allele in recipients who developed acute rejection. The C3-SF and C3-FF genotypes significantly associated with acute rejection with 6.25 times increase in the risk of rejection than C3-SS (OR: 6.25; CI:1.05-37.07, p < .05). C3-SS increases the survival 2.5 times more than C3-SF or C3-FF but without significant association (OR: 0.40, CI: 0.07-2.44, p = .3). C3 genotypes or allotypes had no significant association with the recipient's survival, death, graft loss, infection, or serum levels of tacrolimus (all p > .05). C3-FF and C3-SF genotypes had the highest HCV recurrence rate but without significant association (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

In liver allograft recipients, C3-SF and C3-FF genotypes significantly associated with acute rejection with the C3-F allele more prevalent than the C3-S. C3-SS genotype increases survival without significant association.

Importance of genetic polymorphisms in liver transplantation outcomes

Although, liver transplantation serves as the only curative treatment for patients with end-stage liver diseases, it is burdened with complications, which affect survival rates. In addition to clinical risk factors, contribution of recipient and donor genetic prognostic markers has been extensively studied in order to reduce the burden and improve the outcomes. Determination of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is one of the most important tools in development of personalized transplant approach. To provide a better insight in recent developments, we review the studies published in the last three years that investigated an association of recipient or donor SNPs with most common issues in liver transplantation: Acute cellular rejection, development of new-onset diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and tacrolimus concentration variability. Reviewed studies confirmed previously established SNP prognostic factors, such as PNPLA3 rs738409 for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease development, or the role of CYP3A5 rs776746 in tacrolimus concentration variability. They also identified several novel SNPs, with a reasonably strong association, which have the potential to become useful predictors of post-transplant complications. However, as the studies were typically conducted in one center on relatively low-to-moderate number of patients, verification of the results in other centers is warranted to resolve these limitations. Furthermore, of 29 reviewed studies, 28 used gene candidate approach and only one implemented a genome wide association approach. Genome wide association multicentric studies are needed to facilitate the development of personalized transplant medicine.

Lymphocyte integration of complement cues

We address current data, views and puzzles on the emerging topic of regulation of lymphocytes by complement proteins or fragments. Such regulation is believed to take place through complement receptors (CR) and membrane complement regulators (CReg) involved in cell function or protection, respectively, including intracellular signalling. Original observations in B cells clearly support that complement cues through CR improve their performance. Other lymphocytes likely integrate complement-derived signals, as most lymphoid cells constitutively express or regulate CR and CReg upon activation. CR-induced signals, particularly by anaphylatoxins, clearly regulate lymphoid cell function. In contrast, data obtained by CReg crosslinking using antibodies are not always confirmed in human congenital deficiencies or knock-out mice, casting doubts on their physiological relevance. Unsurprisingly, human and mouse complement systems are not completely homologous, adding further complexity to our still fragmentary understanding of complement-lymphocyte interactions.