No apparent benefit of preemptive sorafenib therapy in liver transplant recipients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma on explant

Comparative Outcome Analysis of Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib for Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurs after liver transplantation (LT) in ~17% of patients. We aimed to retrospectively compare the outcomes of patients treated with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for recurrent HCC post-LT.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent HCC post-LT between 2006 and 2019 were included. The impact of sorafenib and lenvatinib treatment for recurrent disease was assessed using survival analysis with an a priori multivariable Cox regression (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] at recurrence, recurrence lesion diameter, single-site versus multisite metastases).

RESULTS

Seven hundred fifty-four patients underwent LT for HCC, of whom 120 (15.9%) developed recurrence. Of these patients, 56 received TKIs: sorafenib (n = 42) or lenvatinib (n = 14). The median age at LT was 60.8 y (interquartile range, 54.0-66.2); 52 (93%) were men and 26 (46%) were within Milan criteria at listing. Baseline characteristics at recurrence were comparable between the 2 groups, including largest tumor diameter ( P  = 0.15), receipt of local therapies before TKI ( P  = 0.33), and single-site recurrence ( P  = 0.75), and time from interventional treatment to start of TKI ( P  = 0.44). The AFP at recurrence was higher in the sorafenib group (95.0 versus 3.0 µg/L, P  < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) after initiation of TKI treatment was longer in the lenvatinib group (15.0 mo [95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-31.5] versus 7.8 mo [95% CI, 4.0-15.4]; P  = 0.02) with a 2.3-fold a priori adjusted effect on OS (adjusted hazard ratio 2.32 [95% CI, 1.03-5.20], P  = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest lenvatinib is a valuable treatment option for patients with HCC recurrence after LT.

Sorafenib as Adjuvant Therapy Post-Liver Transplant: A Single-center Experience

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a rising incidence and mortality in North America. Liver transplantation (LT) with adjunctive therapies offers excellent outcomes. However, HCC recurrences are associated with high mortality. We investigate whether adjuvant systemic therapy can reduce recurrence, as shown with other malignancies.

Methods

Medical records of patients undergoing LT for HCC at a single center between January 2016 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) recipients of adjuvant sorafenib, (2) nonrecipients at high recurrence risk, and (3) nonrecipients at low risk by explant pathology features. The outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Adjuvant sorafenib recipients were also propensity score matched 1:2 to nonadjuvant recipients based on recurrence risk features.

Results

During the study period, 273 patients with HCC underwent LT and 16 (5.9%) received adjuvant sorafenib therapy. Adjuvant sorafenib recipients were demographically similar to nonrecipients and, on explant pathology, had greater tumor burden, lymphovascular invasion, and poorer differentiation (all P < 0.001). Adverse events were observed in 12 adjuvant sorafenib recipients (75%). OS was similar among the 3 groups (P = 0.2), and adjuvant sorafenib was not associated with OS in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-3.78; P = 0.62). RFS was significantly lower in sorafenib patients (hazard ratio, 6.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-23.05; P = 0.001). Following propensity matching, adjuvant sorafenib use was not associated with either OS (P = 0.24) or RFS rates (P = 0.65).

Conclusions

In this single-center analysis, adjuvant sorafenib was not associated with OS. Recipients were observed to have shorter RFS, likely due to the increased prevalence of high-risk features, and sorafenib use was associated with high frequencies of adverse events.

Machine Perfusion as a Strategy to Decrease Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Lower Cancer Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a key treatment for primary and secondary liver cancers, reducing tumor burden with concurrent improvement of liver function. While significant improvement in survival is noted with LT, cancer recurrence rates remain high. Mitochondrial dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to drive tumor recurrence by creating a favorable microenvironment rich in pro-inflammatory and angiogenic factors. Therefore, strategies that decrease reperfusion injury and mitochondrial dysfunction may also decrease cancer recurrence following LT. Machine perfusion techniques are increasingly used in routine clinical practice of LT with improved post-transplant outcomes and increased use of marginal grafts. Normothermic (NMP) and hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) provide oxygen to ischemic tissues, and impact IRI and potential cancer recurrence through different mechanisms. This article discussed the link between IRI-associated inflammation and tumor recurrence after LT. The current literature was screened for the role of machine perfusion as a strategy to mitigate the risk of cancer recurrence. Upfront NMP ("ischemia free organ transplantation") and end-ischemic HOPE were shown to reduce hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in retrospective studies. Three prospective randomized controlled trials are ongoing in Europe to provide robust evidence on the impact of HOPE on cancer recurrence in LT.

Indication of Liver Transplant for HCC: Current Status and Future Directions

Purpose of Review

Liver transplantation remains the gold-standard treatment for cirrhotic patients with early stage, surgically unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we describe the current state of liver transplantation (LT) for HCC.

Recent Findings

We review recent advances in expanded indications for LT, diagnostics with liquid biopsy and biomarkers, and the emerging role of immunotherapy in this patient population.

Summary

Although the shortage of liver allografts necessitates a restrictive HCC selection policy, future advances in patient selection, liquid biopsy technologies and systemic therapies have the potential to improve access to liver transplantation even in patients with expanded indications, without compromising on post-transplant outcomes.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review and A Glimpse into The Future

Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we explored the development of LT selection criteria and organ allocation policies, comparing original data to underscore their historical progression into the intricate task of quantitatively estimating pre- and post-LT survivals. We emphasized the role of biomarkers such as serum alpha-fetoprotein, Des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin, circulating tumor cells, and circulating tumor DNA in predicting patient outcomes. Additionally, we examined the transplant-associated survival benefits and the difficulties in accurately calculating these benefits. We also reviewed recent advancements in targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for advanced, inoperable HCC and projected their integration into LT for HCC. We further discussed the growing use of living donor liver transplants in the United States and compared its outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplants. Furthermore, we examined the progress in machine perfusion techniques, which have shown potential in improving patient outcomes and enlarging the donor pool. These advancements present opportunities to enhance LT patient survivals, refine selection criteria, establish new priority metrics, develop innovative bridging and downstaging strategies, and formulate redesigned LT strategies for HCC treatments.

Development of a Risk Classifier to Predict Tumor Recurrence and Lenvatinib Benefits in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Current selection tools were not precise enough to predict recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and benefit of adjuvant lenvatinib for patients who received liver transplant (LT) for HCC. Thus, we aim at developing a risk classifier to predict recurrence of HCC and benefit of adjuvant Lenvatinib for those who underwent LT for HCC.

METHODS

Cox regression model was applied to selected predictors and created the final model in a training cohort of 287 patients who underwent LT for HCC, which was tested in an internal validation cohort of 72 patients by using C-statistic and net classification index (NRI) compared with the following HCC selection criteria: the Milan criteria, the Up-to-7 criteria, and the University of California, San Francisco criteria.

RESULTS

We built a Risk Classifier of South China Cohort (RCOSC) based on 4 variables: the maximum diameter plus number of viable tumors, alpha-fetoprotein, microvascular invasion, and highest alanine aminotransferase in 7 days after LT. In validation analyses, our RCOSC showed good predictive performance (C-statistic, 0.866; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.833-0.899) and had better prognostic value than Milan criteria (NRI, 0.406; P < .001), University of California, San Francisco (NRI, 0.497; P < .001), and Up-to-7 (NRI, 0.527; P < .001). By applying the RCOSC, we were able to accurately categorize patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Further survival analysis revealed that the patients in the high-risk group might have a better therapeutic response to preventive regimen of lenvatinib after LT for HCC (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.161-0.871, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

Our RCOSC presented favorable predictive performance for HCC recurrence. It might be capable of sifting out patients who benefit from adjuvant therapy after LT for HCC, providing a reliable tool for precise clinical decision-making of patients with HCC with LT.

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT), occurring in 10-15% of cases, is a major concern. A lot of work has been done in order to refine the selection of LT candidates with HCC and to improve the outcome of patients with recurrence. Despite this, the prognosis of these patients remains poor, partly due to the several areas of uncertainty in their management. Even if surveillance for HCC recurrence is crucial for early detection, there is currently no evidence to support a specific and cost-effective post-LT surveillance strategy. Concerning preventive measures, consensus on the best immunosuppressive drugs has not been reached and not enough data to support adjuvant therapy are present. Several therapeutic approaches (surgical, locoregional and systemic treatments) are available in case of recurrence, but there are still few data in the post-LT setting. Moreover, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is controversial in transplant recipients considered the risk of rejection. In this paper, the available evidence on the management of HCC recurrence after LT is comprehensively reviewed, considering pre- and post-transplant risk stratification, post-transplant surveillance, preventive strategies and treatment options.

Potential Role of Adjuvant Lenvatinib in Improving Disease-Free Survival for Patients With High-Risk Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective, Case Control Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most effective treatments for the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the high-risk patients suffer from a high ratio of tumor recurrence after LT. Lenvatinib, as a novel targeted drug, has shown an excellent effect in the treatment of advanced HCC, but there is no study on its effect in preventing HCC recurrence in the patients undergoing transplantation. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the role of adjuvant lenvatinib in preventing recurrence of high-risk LT recipients with HBV-related HCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 23 high-risk patients consisting of lenvatinib group (n=14) and control group (n=9) with HBV-related HCC who underwent LT in our center. Disease-free survival (DFS) and HCC recurrence of the two groups were compared. The adverse events (AEs) and drug tolerance of lenvatinib were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median DFS in lenvatinib group was 291 (95%CI 204-516) days, significantly longer than 182 (95%CI 56-537) days in control group (P=0.04). Three patients in lenvatinib group (21.4%) and five patients in control group (55.6%) had short-term HCC recurrence (P=0.11). All patients in lenvatinib group could tolerate oral lenvatinib for at least three cycles except six cases (42.9%) of dose reduction and 1 case of interruption (14.3%). Thirteen patients (92.9%) taking lenvatinib experienced AEs. The most common AEs were hypertension (64.3%) and proteinuria (42.9%), and the most serious AEs were Grade 3 for 4 cases (28.5%) according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Additionally, no influence of lenvatinib on the dosage and blood concentration of FK506 was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant lenvatinib had a potential benefit on prolonging the DFS and reducing the recurrence of high-risk HBV-related HCC patients following liver transplantation with an acceptable drug safety and patient tolerance.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Management after the transplant

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an increasingly common indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States and in many parts of the world. In the last decade, significant work has been done to better understand how to risk stratify LT candidates for recurrence of HCC following transplant using a combination of biomarker and imaging findings. However, despite the high frequency of HCC in the LT population, guidance regarding posttransplant management is lacking. In particular, there is no current evidence to support specific post-LT surveillance strategies, leading to significant heterogeneity in practices. In addition, there are no current recommendations regarding recurrence prevention, including immunosuppression regimen or secondary prevention with adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, guidance on treatment of disease recurrence is also lacking and there is significant controversy about the use of immunotherapy in transplant recipients due to the risk of rejection. Thus, outcomes for patients with recurrence are poor. This paper therefore provides a comprehensive review of the current literature on post-LT management of patients with HCC and identifies gaps in our current knowledge that are in urgent need of further investigation.

2019 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri II Recommendations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure in patients with chronic liver disease in India. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) had published its first guidelines on diagnosis and management of HCC (The Puri Recommendations) in 2014, and these guidelines were very well received by the healthcare community involved in diagnosis and management of HCC in India and neighboring countries. However, since 2014, many new developments have taken place in the field of HCC diagnosis and management, hence INASL endeavored to update its 2014 consensus guidelines. A new Task Force on HCC was constituted that reviewed the previous guidelines as well as the recent developments in various aspects of HCC that needed to be incorporated in the new guidelines. A 2-day round table discussion was held on 5th and 6th May 2018 at Puri, Odisha, to discuss, debate, and finalize the revised consensus statements. Each statement of the guideline was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system with minor modifications. We present here the 2019 Update of INASL Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri-2 Recommendations.

Hematopoietic-substrate-1 associated protein X-1 (HAX-1) regulates liver cancer cells growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis through Akt

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanisms of hematopoietic-substrate-1-associated protein X-1 (HAX-1) on liver cancer cells. Information on HAX-1 from liver cancer patients was analyzed by the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program. Cell migration and invasion abilities were respectively tested by scratch assay and transwell assay. Tube formation assay was applied to detect angiogenesis protein and mRNA was determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blot. We found that the median month survival of HAX-1 overexpressing liver cancer patients was shorter than that of HAX-1 normal liver cancer patients. HAX-1 was overexpressed in liver cancer tissues and cells, and HAX-1 overexpression promoted the liver cancer cells growth, migration, and invasion, whereas silencing HAX-1 produced the opposite results. Inhibition of Akt by LY294002 reversed the migration and invasion abilities of liver cancer cells, and inhibited the ability of cells growth and angiogenesis. Silencing PIK3CA enhanced the inhibitory effects of HAX-1 silencing on the viability, migration, and invasion of liver cancer cells. HAX-1 affected liver cancer cells metastasis and angiogenesis by affecting Akt phosphorylation and FOXO3A expression.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: Risk factors, screening and clinical presentation

Liver transplantation is the best treatment option for cirrhotic patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, but it faces the problem of scarcity of donors and the risk of tumor recurrence, which affects between 15% and 20% of the cases, despite the use of restrictive criteria. The risk of recurrence depends on a number of factors, related to the tumor, the patient, and the treatment, which are discussed in this review. Some of these factors are already well established, such as the histopathological characteristics of the tumor, Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and waiting time. Other factors related to the biological behavior of the tumor and treatment should be recognized because they can be used in the refinement of the selection criteria of transplant candidates and in an attempt to reduce recurrence. This review also discusses the clinical presentation of recurrence and its prognosis, contributing to the identification of a subgroup of patients who may have better survival, if they are timely identified and treated. Development of recurrence after the first year, with AFP levels ≤ 100 ng/mL, and single site capable of locoregional therapy are associated with better survival after recurrence.