1
|
Leino AD, Kaiser TE, Khalil K, Mansell H, Taber DJ. Electronic health record-enabled routine assessment of medication adherence after solid organ transplantation: the time is now. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:711-715. [PMID: 38266711 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Medication nonadherence after solid organ transplantation is recognized as an important impediment to long-term graft survival. Yet, assessment of adherence is often not part of routine care. In this Personal Viewpoint, we call for the transplant community to consider implementing a systematic process to screen and assess medication adherence. We believe acceptable tools are available to support integrating adherence assessments into the electronic health record. Creating a standard assessment can be done efficiently and cost-effectively if we come together as a community. More importantly, such monitoring can improve outcomes and strengthen provider-patient relationships. We further discuss the practical challenges and potential rebuttals to our position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbie D Leino
- College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
| | - Tiffany E Kaiser
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Karen Khalil
- Transplant Institute, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Holly Mansell
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - David J Taber
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee-Riddle GS, Schmidt HJ, Reese PP, Nelson MN, Neergaard R, Barg FK, Serper M. Transplant recipient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of medication adherence monitoring technology: A mixed methods study. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:669-680. [PMID: 37923085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Medication nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Adherence monitoring technologies-reminder texts, smart bottles, video-observed ingestion, and digestion-activated signaling pills-may support adherence. However, patient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of these tools are not well studied. We conducted qualitative individual semistructured interviews and focus groups among 97 participants at a single center: kidney and liver transplant recipients 2 weeks to 18 months posttransplant, their care partners, and transplant clinicians. We assessed adherence practices, reactions to monitoring technologies, and opportunities for care integration. One-size-fits-all approaches were deemed infeasible. Interviewees considered text messages the most acceptable approach; live video checks were the least acceptable and raised the most concerns for inconvenience and invasiveness. Digestion-activated signaling technology produced both excitement and apprehension. Patients and care partners generally aligned in perceptions of adherence monitoring integration into clinical care. Key themes were importance of routine, ease of use, leveraging technology for actionable medication changes, and aversion to surveillance. Transplant clinicians similarly considered text messages most acceptable and video checks least acceptable. Clinicians reported that early posttransplant use and real-time adherence tracking with patient feedback may facilitate successful implementation. The study provides initial insights that may inform future adherence technology implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace S Lee-Riddle
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harald J Schmidt
- Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria N Nelson
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rebecca Neergaard
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Frances K Barg
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marina Serper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McCune JS, Armenian SH, Nakamura R, Shan H, Kanakry CG, Mielcarek M, Gao W, Mager DE. Immunosuppressant adherence in adult outpatient hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2024; 30:322-331. [PMID: 37134196 PMCID: PMC10622331 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231171607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication nonadherence continues to be challenging for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. The risk and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are associated with low immunosuppressant concentrations (which can be improved with model-informed precision dosing (MIPD)) and with immunosuppressant nonadherence (which can be improved with acceptable interventions). METHODS With the goals of improving adherence and achieving therapeutic concentrations of immunosuppressants to eliminate GVHD, we characterized the feasibility of using the Medication Event Monitoring (MEMS®) Cap in adult HCT recipients. RESULTS Of the 27 participants offered the MEMS® Cap at the time of hospital discharge, 7 (25.9%) used it, which is below our a priori threshold of 70%. These data suggest the MEMS® Cap is not feasible for HCT recipients. The MEMS® Cap data were available for a median of 35 days per participant per medication (range: 7-109 days). The average daily adherence per participant ranged from 0 to 100%; four participants had an average daily adherence of over 80%. CONCLUSIONS MIPD may be supported by MEMS® technology to provide the precise time of immunosuppressant self-administration. The MEMS® Cap was used by only a small percentage (25.9%) of HCT recipients in this pilot study. In accordance with larger studies using less accurate tools to evaluate adherence, immunosuppressant adherence varied from 0% to 100%. Future studies should establish the feasibility and clinical benefit of combining MIPD with newer technology, specifically the MEMS® Button, which can inform the oncology pharmacist of the time of immunosuppressant self-administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannine S. McCune
- Department of Hematologic Malignancies Translational Sciences, City of Hope, and Department of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Saro H. Armenian
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, and Department of Pediatrics, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ryotaro Nakamura
- Department of Hematologic Malignancies Translational Sciences, City of Hope, and Department of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Hayoue Shan
- Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Christopher G. Kanakry
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunotherapy Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Marco Mielcarek
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Wei Gao
- Andrew and Peggy Cherng Department of Medical Engineering, Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Donald E. Mager
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Enhanced Pharmacodynamics, LLC, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharma A, Verma S, Mirzai S, Viswanathan V, Kapoor S, Hariharan S, Dew MA, Puttarajappa CM. Implementing a self-reported immunosuppression adherence questionnaire to screen for non-adherence in routine care of kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15157. [PMID: 37792310 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Self-reported measures of immunosuppression adherence have been largely examined in research settings. METHODS In this single center study of 610 kidney transplant recipients, we examined if a voluntary, non-anonymous self-report measure could identify non-adherence in a routine clinic setting and how patients perceived such a measure. Non-adherence was measured using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS) and patient perception was elicited using a customized questionnaire. RESULTS Non-responders to the survey (15%) were younger, more likely to be black, and less likely to have had a pre-emptive transplant. Among complete responders (n = 485), 38% reported non-adherence with non-adherent patients being younger (54 y vs. 60 y; p = .01), less likely to have been on dialysis pre-transplant (59% vs. 68%; p = .04), further out from transplant (37 vs. 22 months; p < .001) and had more rejections in the preceding year (8% vs. 3%; p = .02). Self-reported non-adherence was associated with higher calcineurin inhibitor intra-patient variability (27.4% vs. 24.5%; p = .02), but not with donor-specific antibody detection (27.8% vs. 21.2%, p = .15). Of patients providing feedback (n = 500), the majority of patients felt comfortable reporting adherence (92%), that the survey was relevant to their visit (71%), and that the survey did not interfere with their clinic visit (88%). CONCLUSION In summary, a self-reported questionnaire during clinic visits identified immunosuppression non-adherence in a significant proportion of patients and was well received by patients. Integrating self-report measures into routine post-transplant care may enable early identification of non-adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akhil Sharma
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Siddharth Verma
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Saeid Mirzai
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Vignesh Viswanathan
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sanjana Kapoor
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary Amanda Dew
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chethan M Puttarajappa
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Russell CL, Chesnut SR, Bartlett Ellis RJ, Freiburghaus M, Madison M, Ruggeri SY, Stephens MB, Yerram P, Wakefield MR. A Descriptive, Correlational Study of Perceptions of Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients and Those Waiting for a Kidney Transplant About Managing Their Medications During a Pandemic. Prog Transplant 2023; 33:318-327. [PMID: 37964572 DOI: 10.1177/15269248231212906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about COVID-19 impact on patient medication management. Research Question: The aim was to describe medication management, healthcare team interactions, and adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in kidney transplant patients and those on the kidney transplant wait list. Design: Using a descriptive, correlational design 340 adults from a midwestern US transplant program were recruited. The Managing Medications in the Midst of a Pandemic Survey measured healthcare team encounters and medication management. The Basel assessment of adherence to medications scale measured medication adherence. Results: The response rate was 35% (119/340). During the pandemic, 88% had practiced/were currently practicing socially distancing, 85% had worn/were currently wearing a face mask in public, 18% had been/were currently diagnosed with COVID-19 and 82% received the vaccine. Medication management: 76% planned and organized their own medications. Healthcare team interactions: 89% met in the office, 20% via phone, 12% telehealth, and 13% delayed seeing a healthcare provider because of COVID-19 concerns. Pharmacy interactions: 11% changed their method of obtaining medications from pharmacy due to social distancing. Medication adherence implementation was problematic with 19% missing a dose; results from the binary logistic regression suggested that those with higher levels of education were more likely to report missing a dose. Conclusions: Patients acted to prevent COVID-19 but some still contracted the virus. The pandemic changed healthcare team medication management interactions. Adherence implementation problems were nearly 20%. Findings are relevant to the transplant healthcare team to understand the impact of a pandemic on patient/team interactions and medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia L Russell
- University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Steven R Chesnut
- University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Mary Freiburghaus
- University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Mercedes Madison
- University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Sunny Yoo Ruggeri
- Dr. Lillian R. Goodman Department of Nursing, Worcester State University, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Mary B Stephens
- University of Missouri Healthcare Renal Transplant Program, University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Preethi Yerram
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Staff Physician-Harry S Truman VA Hospital, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Mark R Wakefield
- Renal Transplant Program Director, University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Torres-Gutiérrez M, Burgos-Camacho V, Caamaño-Jaraba JP, Lozano-Suárez N, García-López A, Girón-Luque F. Prevalence and Modifiable Factors for Holistic Non-Adherence in Renal Transplant Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:2201-2213. [PMID: 37701427 PMCID: PMC10493132 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s419324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In renal transplant recipients, compliance with medical therapy is vital. Non-adherence is considered a risk factor for worst outcomes in kidney recipients, with attributed outcomes of 64% for graft loss and 80% for late acute rejection. Most literature defines adherence as self-based immunosuppression compliance but does not consider other relevant factors such as consult and procedure compliance. Therefore, this study aims to describe adherence prevalence in kidney transplant recipients and the factors related to non-adherence. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1030 renal transplant patients followed by Colombiana de Trasplantes between January 2019 and July 2021. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were obtained based on clinical records. The mental-health group diagnosed holistic adherence in a semi-structured interview. The diagnosis considered medication intake failure, frequency and number of failures to medical controls or other procedures, suspicious non-adherence behaviors, and serum levels of immunosuppressants. A bivariate followed a descriptive analysis, and a forward logistic regression was performed for non-adherence. Results Patients had a median of 47 years, and 58.1% were male. Non-adherence was presented in 30.7% of patients. The non-adherence patients were younger, with a higher prevalence of males, single, divided transplant care, had a longer time after transplantation, psychopathological diagnosis, and more reinforcement education by only nursing. Older age and multidisciplinary reinforcement education were protective factors. On the other hand, poor social support, psychopathology diagnosis, and longer time after transplant presented as non-adherence risk factors. Conclusion Holistic non-adherence was diagnosed in approximately one-third of renal transplant recipients. Its definition included more than just medication non-compliance and could identify more non-adherent patients. Notably, there is a need to consider the related factors in the health follow-up and encourage future research in modifiable factor interventions aiming to increase adherence and achieve better outcomes for renal transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Andrea García-López
- Department of Transplant Research, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Fernando Girón-Luque
- Department of Transplant Research, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wagner-Skacel J, Fink N, Kahn J, Dalkner N, Jauk E, Bengesser S, Mairinger M, Schüssler G, Pieh C, Stadlbauer V, Kirsch AH, Zitta S, Rosenkranz AR, Fickert P, Schemmer P. Improving adherence to immunosuppression after liver or kidney transplantation in individuals with impairments in personality functioning – A randomized controlled single center feasibility study. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1150548. [PMID: 36968754 PMCID: PMC10033957 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionAlthough adherence to immunosuppressive medication is the key factor for long-term graft survival today, 20–70% of transplant recipients are non-adherent to their immunosuppressive medication.ObjectiveA prospective, randomized, controlled single-center feasibility study was designed to evaluate the impact of a step guided multicomponent interprofessional intervention program for patients after kidney or liver transplantation on adherence to their immunosuppressive medication in daily clinical practice.Materials and methodsThe intervention consisted of group therapy and daily training as well as individual sessions in a step guided approach. The primary endpoint of the study was adherence to immunosuppression as assessed with the “Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale” (BAASIS). The coefficient of variation (CV%) of Tacrolimus (TAC) through levels and the level of personality functioning was a secondary endpoint. We conducted six monthly follow-up visits.ResultsForty-one age- and sex-matched patients [19 females, 58.5 (SD = 10.56) years old, 22 kidney- and 19 liver transplantation] were randomized to the intervention- (N = 21) or control-group (N = 20). No differences between intervention- and control groups were found in the primary endpoint adherence and CV% of TAC. However, in further exploratory analyses, we observed that individuals with higher impairments in personality functioning showed higher CV% of TAC in the controls. The intervention might compensate personality-related susceptibility to poor adherence as evident in CV% of TAC.DiscussionThe results of the feasibility study showed that this intervention program was highly accepted in the clinical setting. The Intervention group could compensate higher CV% of TAC after liver or kidney transplantation in individuals with lower levels of personality functioning and non-adherence.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04207125.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolana Wagner-Skacel
- Department of Medical Psychology, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nadja Fink
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Abdominal, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Judith Kahn
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Abdominal, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nina Dalkner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Emanuel Jauk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Susanne Bengesser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marco Mairinger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gerhard Schüssler
- Department of Medical Psychology, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christoph Pieh
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Vanessa Stadlbauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alexander H. Kirsch
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- *Correspondence: Alexander H. Kirsch,
| | - Sabine Zitta
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alexander R. Rosenkranz
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Fickert
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Schemmer
- University Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Abdominal, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vaisbourd Y, Dahhou M, Zhang X, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Cardinal H, Johnston O, Blydt-Hansen TD, Tibbles LA, Hamiwka L, Urschel S, Birk P, Bissonnette J, Matsuda-Abedini M, BScPhm JH, Schiff J, Phan V, De Geest S, Allen U, Avitzur Y, Mital S, Foster BJ. Differences in medication adherence by sex and organ type among adolescent and young adult solid organ transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14446. [PMID: 36478059 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of differences in medication adherence by sex or organ type may help in planning interventions to optimize outcomes. We compared immunosuppressive medication adherence between males and females, and between kidney, liver and heart transplant recipients. METHODS This multicenter study of prevalent kidney, liver and heart transplant recipients 14-25 years assessed adherence 3 times (0, 3, 6 months post-enrollment) with the BAASIS self-report tool. At each visit, participants were classified as adherent if they missed no doses in the prior 4 weeks and non-adherent otherwise. Adherence was also assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) of tacrolimus trough levels; CV < 30% was classified as adherent. We used multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders to compare adherence by sex and by organ. RESULTS Across all visits, males (n = 150, median age 20.4 years, IQR 17.2-23.3) had lower odds of self-reported adherence than females (n = 120, median age 19.8 years, IQR 17.1-22.7) (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.80) but higher odds of adherence by tacrolimus CV (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.30-4.82). No significant differences in adherence (by self-report or tacrolimus CV) were noted between the 184 kidney, 58 liver, and 28 heart recipients. CONCLUSION Females show better self-reported adherence than males but greater variability in tacrolimus levels. Social desirability bias, more common in females than males, may contribute to better self-reported adherence among females. Higher tacrolimus variability among females may reflect biologic differences in tacrolimus metabolism between males and females rather than sex differences in adherence. There were no significant differences in adherence by organ type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mourad Dahhou
- Research Institute of The McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Xun Zhang
- Research Institute of The McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Research Institute of The McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Olwyn Johnston
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tom D Blydt-Hansen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lee Anne Tibbles
- Department of Medicine and Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lorraine Hamiwka
- Department of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Simon Urschel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Patricia Birk
- Section of Pediatric Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Mina Matsuda-Abedini
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Harrison BScPhm
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Schiff
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sabina De Geest
- Department Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Academic Center of Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Upton Allen
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yaron Avitzur
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seema Mital
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bethany J Foster
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.,Research Institute of The McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling to Enhance the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic Acid: A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment. Ther Drug Monit 2023:00007691-990000000-00082. [PMID: 36728554 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000001066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an emerging technique that may support multisample collection to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring in solid organ transplantation. This review aimed to assess whether tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid can be reliably assayed using VAMS and to identify knowledge gaps by providing granularity to existing analytical methods and clinical applications. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were accessed for records from January 2014 to April 2022 to identify scientific reports on the clinical validation of VAMS for monitoring tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid concentrations. Data on the study population, sample sources, analytical methods, and comparison results were compiled. RESULTS Data from 12 studies were collected, including 9 studies pertaining to tacrolimus and 3 studies on the concurrent analysis of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. An additional 14 studies that provided information relevant to the secondary objectives (analytical validation and clinical application) were also included. The results of the clinical validation studies generally met the method agreement requirements described by regulatory agencies, but in many cases, it was essential to apply correction factors. CONCLUSIONSS Current evidence suggests that the existing analytical methods that use VAMS require additional optimization steps for the analysis of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. The recommendations put forth in this review can help guide future studies in achieving the goal of improving the care of transplant recipients by simplifying multisample collection for the dose optimization of these drugs.
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang M, Wu W, Zhang Q, Li J, Zhang H, Wu C, Fu Q, Wu S, Chen Y, Li J, Su X, Liu L, Wang C. Single kidney transplantation from pediatric deceased donors in China: the outcomes and risk factors of graft survival. Transl Pediatr 2022; 11:1872-1885. [PMID: 36506765 PMCID: PMC9732603 DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric deceased donors offer great potential for expanding the organ donor pool. The utilization of pediatric donor kidneys has been explored by numerous transplant centers; however, the transplant outcome and risk factors have not been well elucidated. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and risk factors of transplant outcome from pediatric deceased donors. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 484 cases of single kidney transplantation (SKT) with pediatric donor kidneys performed at our center from January 2012 to March 2021. The recipients were grouped by age: child (≤12 years; n=143), adolescents (12-18 years; n=86), and adults (≥18 years; n=255). The overall prognosis of the recipients was analyzed, and the post-transplant outcomes were compared among the three groups and assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional risk model. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 26.7 months. The 1- and 3-year patient survival rates were 98.7% and 96.8%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year death-censored graft survival (DCGS) was 96.1% and 92.7%, respectively. The overall estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) at 1 and 3 years were 80.0±24.5 and 84.2±25.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; the 3-year eGFR of the three groups were comparable and all were over 80 mL/min/1.73 m2. Rejection was an independent risk factor for death-censored graft failure within 3 years after transplantation [hazard ratio (HR) =3.85; P=0.001], and was the primary cause of graft losses in the adolescent group. Thrombosis was more common within 1-month post-transplant in the child recipients (P<0.05), and its incidence was higher in recipients with donor body weight (DBW) ≤11 kg. CONCLUSIONS SKT from pediatric donors could achieve decent outcomes. Rejection was an independent risk factor of graft survival, especially for adolescent recipients. Child recipients may compromise early transplant outcomes due to vascular thrombosis, which might be related to small (DBW ≤11 kg) pediatric donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingchuan Huang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenrui Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanxi Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenglin Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Fu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shenghui Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanxu Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianming Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Su
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longshan Liu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Changxi Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Whittington M, Goggin K, Noel-MacDonnell J, Hathaway D, Remy L, Aholt D, Clark D, Miller C, Ashbaugh C, Wakefield M, Ellis RB, Russell C. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Personal Systems Approach in Improving Medication Adherence in Adult Kidney Transplant Patients. J Healthc Qual 2022; 44:240-252. [PMID: 35759613 PMCID: PMC9245085 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Interventions to improve medication nonadherence in transplantation have recently moved from a focus on motivation and intention, to a focus on person-level quality improvement strategies. These strategies link adherence to established daily routines, environmental cues, and supportive people. The objective of this evaluation was to estimate the cost of implementation and the cost-effectiveness of a person-level intervention shown to increase medication adherence. To estimate the intervention costs, a direct measure microcosting approach was used after key informant interviews with project champions and a review of implementation expenditures. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by comparing the incremental implementation costs and healthcare costs associated with nonadherence to the incremental percent adherent, defined as the percent of patients who took greater or equal to 85% of their medication doses, for each pairwise comparison. The intervention was low-resource to implement, costing approximately $520 to implement per patient, and was associated with significant improvements in medication adherence. These implementation costs were more than outweighed by the expected healthcare savings associated with improvements in adherence. This person-level intervention is a low-cost, efficacious intervention associated with significant statistical and clinical improvements in medication adherence in adult kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Christon LM, Smith PJ. Psychosocial Evaluation for Lung Transplantation: an Empirically Informed Update. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00360-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
13
|
Maurer MM, Ibach M, Plewe J, Winter A, Ritschl P, Globke B, Öllinger R, Lurje G, Schöning W, Pratschke J, Eurich D. Reducing the Pill Burden: Immunosuppressant Adherence and Safety after Conversion from a Twice-Daily (IR-Tac) to a Novel Once-Daily (LCP-Tac) Tacrolimus Formulation in 161 Liver Transplant Patients. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10020272. [PMID: 35203481 PMCID: PMC8869578 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-adherence to immunosuppressant therapy reduces long-term graft and patient survival after solid organ transplantation. The objective of this 24-month prospective study was to determine adherence, efficacy and safety after conversion of stable liver transplant (LT) recipients from a standard twice-daily immediate release Tacrolimus (IR-Tac) to a novel once-daily life cycle pharma Tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) formulation. We converted a total of 161 LT patients at baseline, collecting Tacrolimus trough levels, laboratories, physical examination data and the BAASIS© questionnaire for self-reported adherence to immunosuppression at regular intervals. With 134 participants completing the study period (17% dropouts), the overall adherence to the BAASIS© increased by 57% until month 24 compared to baseline (51% vs. 80%). Patients who required only a morning dose of their concomitant medications reported the largest improvement in adherence after conversion. The intra-patient variability (IPV) of consecutive Tacrolimus trough levels after conversion did not change significantly compared to pre-conversion levels. Despite reducing the daily dose by 30% at baseline as recommended by the manufacturer, Tac-trough levels remained stable, reflected by an increase in the concentration-dose (C/D) ratio. No episodes of graft rejection or loss occurred. Our data suggest that the use of LCP-Tac in liver transplant patients is safe and can increase adherence to immunosuppression compared to conventional IR-Tac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M. Maurer
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)-30-450-652-418
| | - Marius Ibach
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| | - Julius Plewe
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| | - Axel Winter
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| | - Paul Ritschl
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Brigitta Globke
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.I.); (J.P.); (A.W.); (P.R.); (B.G.); (R.Ö.); (G.L.); (W.S.); (J.P.); (D.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lichvar A, Chandran MM, Do V, Rendulic T, Szczepanik A, Pierce D, Park JM. Entrustable professional activities for pharmacy students: A primer for solid organ transplant preceptors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 78:zxab320. [PMID: 34350946 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
DISCLAIMER In an effort to expedite the publication of articles , AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE The role of a solid organ transplant pharmacist is multifaceted and translates to diverse experiential and elective learning experiences that can be provided to pharmacy learners. Here we provide a guide to integrating pharmacy students into patient care and other pharmacist activities in solid organ transplantation. SUMMARY Thoughtful incorporation of learners into clinical practice and clinical research creates a positive learning environment for pharmacy students that can foster the development of core skills necessary for students to become "practice-ready" and "team-ready" pharmacy graduates and can equip them with valuable skills to incorporate into the specialty practice areas and careers they pursue. To help develop these educational experiences, attention to the list of core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) established by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy can help create a rich environment of learning with carefully cultivated tasks. Furthermore, learners can serve as transplant pharmacist extenders to assist in overall patient care and multidisciplinary involvement on the transplant team. This article serves as a "how-to" guide for applying the EPA framework to integrating pharmacy students in patient care and other pharmacist activities in solid organ transplantation and other specialty practice areas. CONCLUSION As pharmacy preceptors design and operationalize their teaching to incorporate EPAs, they can benefit from recommendations tailored to specialty practice areas such as solid organ transplantation. Students may start and finish these experiences at different EPA levels, but continuance of training will allow them to achieve the final EPA level across the 6 EPA domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Lichvar
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, and Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Vincent Do
- Department of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Trisann Rendulic
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Amanda Szczepanik
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dana Pierce
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeong M Park
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and Department of Pharmacy Services, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Krause AV, Bertram A, Nöhre M, Bauer-Hohmann M, Schiffer M, de Zwaan M. Use of an electronic medication monitoring device to estimate medication adherence in kidney transplant patients. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:842-851. [PMID: 33710349 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Electronic medication monitoring devices (EMD) have been used as a gold standard for assessing medication adherence. We used a wireless EMD (SimpleMed+), assessed its usability in patients after kidney transplantation (KTx), evaluated adherence, and analyzed concordance with other adherence measures. Fifty-five patients (53% female, mean age 46 years) at least 6 months after KTx agreed to use the EMD over a period of 8 weeks. Self-reported adherence was measured with the BAASIS, and immunosuppressant trough level variability was assessed prior to and again during the study period. Fourteen patients stopped using the EMD or were low users (<70%). These non-completers reported that using the EMD would interfere with their daily activities. Taking-adherence of the completers was high with 98.3% (±1.9) over the entire study period. Timing-adherence was somewhat lower (94.6% ± 7.9) and decreased during the second half of the study. We found statistically significant correlations between EMD results and self-reported adherence with moderate effect sizes, but no significant association with trough level variability. The low usage of the EMD supports the need to assess the practicability of an EMD before applying it in research and clinical routine. Taking- and timing-adherence of KTx patients using the EMD was satisfactory. Self-reported adherence might be a good enough estimate of medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Viktoria Krause
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hanover, Germany
| | - Anna Bertram
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hanover, Germany.,Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, Angiology and Rheumatology, KRH Regional Hospital Hannover Siloah, Hanover, Germany
| | - Mariel Nöhre
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Maximilian Bauer-Hohmann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Mario Schiffer
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.,Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martina de Zwaan
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wessels-Bakker MJ, van de Graaf EA, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Heijerman HG, Cahn W, Schappin R. The relation between psychological distress and medication adherence in lung transplant candidates and recipients: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2021; 31:716-725. [PMID: 34216066 PMCID: PMC9292052 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore the prevalence of psychological distress such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder and its associations with medication adherence in lung transplant patients. BACKGROUND Psychological distress after lung transplantation may impact clinical outcomes by associated behaviours such as non-adherence to medication. Evidence about the relation between psychological distress and medication adherence in lung transplant patients is limited and not well explained. DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a single-centre study with a cross-sectional design in 73 lung transplant candidates and 116 recipients. Questionnaires were the Brief Symptom Inventory, Impact of Event Scale and Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale. The STROBE checklist was monitored. RESULTS In candidates, 39.7% reported (sub)clinical symptoms of depression, in recipients this was 21.6%. We observed suicidal ideation in recipients (8.6%), and candidates (5.5%). The prevalence of (sub)clinical symptoms of anxiety was 38.3% in candidates and 33.7% in recipients. After lung transplantation, 12% of the recipients reported clinical symptoms of PTSD related to the transplantation. Symptoms of anxiety and medication adherence were significantly and positively related in transplant recipients. We found no association between depressive or post-traumatic stress symptoms, and medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS In lung transplant patients, we found a high prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety. Recipients had high levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms related to the transplantation. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was unexpectedly high in recipients. After lung transplantation, higher levels of anxiety were related to better medication adherence. We propose that LTX recipients are very anxious to develop dyspnoea and therefore take their medication more conscientiously. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE The clinical nurse specialist can play a key role in identifying and addressing psychological and behavioural problems. More prospective research on the role of anxiety and dyspnoea in lung transplant recipients is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion J Wessels-Bakker
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eduard A van de Graaf
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harry G Heijerman
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wiepke Cahn
- Department of Mental Health, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Renske Schappin
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patel SJ, Hofmeyer BA, Moore CA, Descourouez JL, Nguyen DT, Graviss EA, Taber DJ. Medication nonadherence monitoring and management in adult kidney transplantation: A survey of practices and perceptions at
US‐based
transplant programs. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samir J. Patel
- Medical Affairs, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Cary North Carolina USA
| | | | - Cody A. Moore
- Pharmacy University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
| | | | - Duc T. Nguyen
- Pathology and Genomic Medicine Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA
- Houston Methodist Academic Institute Houston Texas USA
| | - Edward A. Graviss
- Pathology and Genomic Medicine Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA
- Houston Methodist Academic Institute Houston Texas USA
| | - David J. Taber
- Pharmacy Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prospective Measures of Adherence by Questionnaire, Low Immunosuppression and Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10092032. [PMID: 34068497 PMCID: PMC8125965 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10092032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Non-adherence with immunosuppressant medication (MNA) fosters development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), rejection, and graft failure (GF) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, there is no simple tool to assess MNA, prospectively. The goal was to monitor MNA and analyze its predictive value for dnDSA generation, acute rejection and GF. Methods: We enrolled 301 KTRs in a multicentric French study. MNA was assessed prospectively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (M) post-KT, using the Morisky scale. We investigated the association between MNA and occurrence of dnDSA at year 2 post transplantation, using logistic regression models and the association between MNA and rejection or graft failure, using Cox multivariable models. Results: The initial percentage of MNA patients was 17.7%, increasing to 34.6% at 24 months. Nineteen patients (8.4%) developed dnDSA 2 to 3 years after KT. After adjustment for recipient age, HLA sensitization, HLA mismatches, and maintenance treatment, MNA was associated neither with dnDSA occurrence, nor acute rejection. Only cyclosporine use and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal were strongly associated with dnDSA and rejection. With a median follow-up of 8.9 years, GF occurred in 87 patients (29.0%). After adjustment for recipient and donor age, CNI trough level, dnDSA, and rejection, MNA was not associated with GF. The only parameters associated with GF were dnDSA occurrence, and acute rejection. Conclusions: Prospective serial monitoring of MNA using the Morisky scale does not predict dnDSA occurrence, rejection or GF in KTRs. In contrast, cyclosporine and CNI withdrawal induce dnDSA and rejection, which lead to GF.
Collapse
|
19
|
Smith PJ, Potter G, Manson M, Martin M, Cendales LC. Psychosocial considerations in the assessment of hand transplant candidates: A single-center experience and brief literature review. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14268. [PMID: 33615558 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Vascularized composite allograft, including hand transplantation (HT), has gained wider usage as a reconstructive treatment over the past 30 years. HT recipients face unique psychosocial challenges compared to their solid organ and/or bone marrow transplant counterparts. Accordingly, the psychosocial evaluation among HT candidates continues to evolve, leaving a lack of consensus as to the critical psychosocial domains and psychometric testing instruments to help evaluate individuals considering HT. The present manuscript describes the psychosocial evaluation process within the Duke HT program, which been contacted by 80 potential candidates since 2014. The Duke HT evaluation process incorporates a comprehensive psychosocial assessment within domains including personality, cognitive function, mood, behavioral adherence, social support, and substance use history, among others. Our experience underscores the potential utility of collecting thorough psychosocial evaluations, supplemented by psychometric test data, to comprehensively assess potential HT candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Smith
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Guy Potter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Maria Manson
- Duke Office of Clinical Research, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael Martin
- Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Mental Health Service Line, Decatur, GA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Linda C Cendales
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Impact of a Mobile Health Intervention on Long-term Nonadherence After Lung Transplantation: Follow-up After a Randomized Controlled Trial. Transplantation 2020; 104:640-651. [PMID: 31335759 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a randomized controlled trial, lung transplant recipients (LTRs) using a mobile health intervention, Pocket Personal Assistant for Tracking Health (Pocket PATH), showed better adherence to the medical regimen than LTRs receiving usual care during the first year posttransplant. We examined whether these effects were maintained beyond the end of the trial and evaluated other potential risk factors for long-term nonadherence. METHODS Adherence in 8 areas was evaluated at follow-up in separate LTR and family caregiver (collateral) assessments. Pocket PATH and usual care groups' nonadherence rates were compared; multivariable regression analyses then examined and controlled for other patient characteristics' associations with nonadherence. RESULTS One hundred five LTRs (75% of survivors) were assessed (M = 3.9 years posttransplant, SD = 0.8). Nonadherence rates in the past month were 23%-81% for self-care and lifestyle requirements (diet, exercise, blood pressure monitoring, spirometry), 13%-23% for immunosuppressants and other medications, and 4% for tobacco use, with 31% clinic appointment nonadherence in the past year. In multivariable analysis, the Pocket PATH group showed lower risk of nonadherence to lifestyle requirements (diet/exercise) than the usual care group (P < 0.05). Younger age and factors during the first year posttransplant (acute graft rejection, chronically elevated anxiety, less time rehospitalized, nonadherence at the final randomized controlled trial assessment) were each associated with nonadherence in at least 1 area at follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Pocket PATH did not have sustained impact on most areas of the regimen, although we identified other risk factors for long-term nonadherence. Future work should explore strategies to facilitate sustained effects of mobile health interventions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Nguyen C, Dew MA, Irizarry T, McNulty M, Rennick J, Knäuper B, Descoteaux A, Grenier A, Jeannot L, Foster BJ, DeVito Dabbs AJ. Promoting medication adherence from the perspective of adolescent and young adult kidney transplant recipients, parents, and health care professionals: A TAKE-IT TOO study. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13709. [PMID: 32388916 PMCID: PMC7392786 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Medication non-adherence is an important factor limiting allograft survival after kidney transplantation in AYA. Some interventions, including the TAKE-IT, showed some success in promoting adherence but the potential for scalability and use in routine clinical practice is limited. We applied user-centered design to gather the perspectives of recipients, parents, and health professionals concerning their needs, challenges, and potential intervention strategies to design an optimal, multi-component medication adherence intervention. The qualitative study was conducted at four Canadian and three American kidney transplant programs. Separate focus groups for recipients, parents, and health professionals were convened to explore these stakeholders' perspectives. Directed content analysis was employed to identify themes that were shared vs distinct across stakeholders. All stakeholder groups reported challenges related to taking medications on time in the midst of their busy schedules and the demands of transitioning toward independence during adolescence. The stakeholders also made suggestions for the multi-component behavioral intervention, including an expanded electronic pillbox and companion website, education materials, and customized digitized features to support shared responsibility and communication among recipients, parents, and health professionals. Several suggestions regarding the functionality and features of the potential intervention reported in this early stage will be explored in more depth as the iterative process unfolds. Our approach to actively involve all stakeholders in the process increases the likelihood of designing an adherence intervention that is truly user-informed and fit for the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Nguyen
- UH Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital Division of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mary Amanda Dew
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Psychiatry Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Taya Irizarry
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Acute and Tertiary Care Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mary McNulty
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Psychiatry Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Janet Rennick
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Montreal, QC, CAN
| | | | - Annie Descoteaux
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ste. Justine, Montreal, QC, CAN
| | | | - Lovemine Jeannot
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Montreal, QC, CAN
| | - Bethany J Foster
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Montreal, QC, CAN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ice LL, Bartoo GT, McCullough KB, Wolf RC, Dierkhising RA, Mara KC, Jowsey-Gregoire SG, Damlaj M, Litzow MR, Merten JA. A Prospective Survey of Outpatient Medication Adherence in Adult Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020; 26:1627-1634. [PMID: 32505809 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Limited data exist regarding the prevalence and outcome of medication nonadherence in the adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) population. The objective of this cross-sectional survey study is to determine the prevalence of medication nonadherence to immunosuppressant and nonimmunosuppressant medications in adult recipients of allo-HSCT. An electronic survey using previously validated medication adherence scales was distributed between December 2014 and April 2015 to 200 adult patients with at least 3 months of follow-up after allo-HSCT. Immunosuppressant serum drug levels and prescription refill records were retrospectively collected to assess correlation with survey responses. In the entire cohort, 51% of subjects (n = 102) reported nonadherence to nonimmunosuppressant medications (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.07% to 57.93%) on the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Of the 153 patients taking oral immunosuppressant medications at the time of the survey, 58 (37.9%) reported nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy (95% CI, 30.22% to 45.6%), as measured by the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale. Younger age and distress were associated with medication nonadherence. Nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy was associated with mild chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGVHD), and a similar trend was observed for moderate cGVHD. Medication nonadherence was found to be highly prevalent for both immunosuppressant and nonimmunosuppressant medications in adult allo-HSCT recipient, and further study to identify interventions to improve adherence in these patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren L Ice
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Gabriel T Bartoo
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Robert C Wolf
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ross A Dierkhising
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kristin C Mara
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Moussab Damlaj
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mark R Litzow
- Division of Hematology, Division of Palliative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Julianna A Merten
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chisholm-Burns MA, Spivey CA, Potukuchi PK, Streja E, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kovesdy CP, Molnar MZ. Association between Posttransplant Opioid Use and Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence among Renal Transplant Recipients. Nephron Clin Pract 2020; 144:321-330. [PMID: 32434210 DOI: 10.1159/000507257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Little is known about the effect of posttransplant opioid use on adherence to immunosuppressant therapy (IST) among adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between opioid use and IST adherence among adult RTRs during the first year posttransplant. METHODS Longitudinal data were analyzed from a retrospective cohort study examining US veterans undergoing renal transplant from October 1, 2007, through March 31, 2015. Data were collected from the US Renal Data System, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Data (Medicare Part D), and Veterans Affairs pharmacy records. Dose of opioid prescriptions was collected and divided based on annual morphine milligram equivalent within a year of transplant. Proportion of days covered of greater than or equal to 80% indicated adherence to tacrolimus. Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS A study population of 1,229 RTRs included 258 with no opioid use, while 971 opioid users were identified within the first year after transplantation. Compared to RTRs without opioid usage, RTRs with opioid usage had a lower probability of being adherent to tacrolimus in unadjusted logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.22 [0.07-0.72]) and adjusted logistic regression (OR [95% CI]: 0.11 [0.03-0.44]). These patterns generally remained consistent in unadjusted and adjusted main and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate RTRs who use prescription opioids during the first year posttransplant, regardless of the dosage/amount, are less likely to be adherent to tacrolimus. Future studies are needed to better understand underlying causes of the association between opioid use and tacrolimus nonadherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie A Chisholm-Burns
- College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA,
| | - Christina A Spivey
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Praveen K Potukuchi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Institute for Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elani Streja
- Division of Nephrology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | | | - Csaba P Kovesdy
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Nephrology Section, Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Miklos Z Molnar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peipert JD, Badawy SM, Baik SH, Oswald LB, Efficace F, Garcia SF, Mroczek DK, Wolf M, Kaiser K, Yanez B, Cella D. Development of the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Medication Adherence Scale (PMAS). Patient Prefer Adherence 2020; 14:971-983. [PMID: 32606615 PMCID: PMC7293395 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s249079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Poor medication adherence is associated with reduced drug effectiveness, poor health-related quality of life, increased morbidity and mortality, and increased healthcare utilization and cost. Including the patient's voice is essential in understanding barriers to adherence. Useful patient-reported adherence measures are brief, inexpensive, non-invasive; can indicate barriers to adherence; and can be incorporated in electronic health records. The NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) includes high-quality, freely available patient-reported measures covering many important constructs in patient-centered research but does not include a medication adherence measure. To fill this gap, we developed the PROMIS Medication Adherence Scale (PMAS) using the rigorous PROMIS instrument development guidelines. To develop the PMAS, we first conducted a review of the reviews, which enabled us to identify content areas relevant to medication adherence behavior. Then, we conducted qualitative research to elicit patients' views of and experiences with medication adherence. This process identified the following important content areas to guide item writing: extent medication is taken, knowledge of medication regimen, beliefs about medication, remembering to take medication, skipping due to side effects, skipping due to feeling better, and cost of medications. Based on the results of these activities, we wrote items and aimed to retain 1-2 items per content area. The final item set included 9 total adherence items, which were then refined through intensive comprehension and translatability review, as well as cognitive interviews. Future steps include testing the PMAS's validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Correspondence: John Devin Peipert Email
| | - Sherif M Badawy
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sharon H Baik
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Laura B Oswald
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Disease (GIMEMA), Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel K Mroczek
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Wolf
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karen Kaiser
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ladin K, Marotta SA, Butt Z, Gordon EJ, Daniels N, Lavelle TA, Hanto DW. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Variation in Social Support Requirements and Implications for Access to Transplantation in the United States. Prog Transplant 2019; 29:344-353. [PMID: 31581889 DOI: 10.1177/1526924819874387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Social support is a key component of transplantation evaluation in the United States. Social support definitions and evaluation procedures require examination to achieve clear, consistent implementation. We surveyed psychosocial clinicians from the Society for Transplant Social Workers and American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their definitions and evaluation procedures for using social support to determine transplant eligibility. Bivariate statistical analysis was used for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. Among 276 psychosocial clinicians (50.2% response rate), 92% had ruled out patients from transplantation due to inadequate support. Social support definitions varied significantly: 10% of respondents indicated their center lacked a definition. Key domains of social support included informational, emotional, instrumental, motivational, paid support, and the patient's importance to others. Almost half of clinicians (47%) rarely or never requested second opinions when excluding patients due to social support. Confidence and perceived clarity and consistency in center guidelines were significantly associated with informing patients when support contributed to negative wait-listing decisions (P = .001). Clinicians who excluded fewer patients because of social support offered significantly more supportive health care (P = .02). Clearer definitions and more supportive care may reduce the number of patients excluded from transplant candidacy due to inadequate social support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Ladin
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.,Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
| | - Satia A Marotta
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
| | - Zeeshan Butt
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Studies and Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Norman Daniels
- Department of Global Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Douglas W Hanto
- VA St Louis Health Care System, St Louis, MO, USA.,Vanderbilt Transplant Center and Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kuypers DRJ. Intrapatient Variability of Tacrolimus Exposure in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Novel Marker for Clinical Outcome. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 107:347-358. [PMID: 31449663 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The calcineurin-inhibitor tacrolimus (Tac) provides an acceptable balance between prevention of allograft rejection and drug-related adverse effects, making it the standard of care in all types of solid organ transplantation for the last 2 decades. Recent data have demonstrated that high intrapatient variability (IPV) in Tac predose trough concentrations has deleterious effects on allograft survival. The underlying mechanisms by which a high Tac IPV shortens allograft survival are acute and chronic rejection, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, and progressive fibrotic damage to the graft. Modifiable causes of high Tac IPV include medication nonadherence (MNA), drug interactions, nutritional interferences, and concurrent diseases. Recognizing high Tac IPV as an important prognostic risk factor after solid organ transplantation requires understanding of the definitions, the use of correct diagnostic metrics, and methodology. Therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing Tac IPV are targeted on improving MNA, avoiding or adjusting drug interactions, drug dosing assists, and educational support of recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk R J Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang M, Zhou H, Nelson RS, Han Y, Wang Y, Xiang H, Cai J, Zhang J, Yuan Y. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Immunosuppressant Nonadherence in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:2185-2193. [PMID: 31908425 PMCID: PMC6930119 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s223837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunosuppressant nonadherence (INA) has been shown to affect outcomes after solid organ transplantation. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of INA in heart transplant recipients and the associated risk factors of INA. METHODS Adult heart transplant recipients who firstly received heart transplantation (discharged for at least 3 months) were consecutively enrolled. Immunosuppressant adherence was assessed using the Basel Assessment of Adherence with Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS). INA was categorized into five domains of contributing factors (socio-demographic factors, transplant-related factors, healthcare system access factors, post-transplant treatment-related factors, and patient-related psychosocial factors). These factors were compared between adherent and nonadherent patients. The risk factors of INA were investigated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 168 heart recipients were ultimately included. Among them, 69 (41.1%) recipients were revealed to be nonadherent. Logistic regression analysis indicated that INA was associated with monthly income<3000 Chinese Yuan (CNY) (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.58-6.12; p=0.001), number of prescribed concomitant drugs (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.50; p=0.003) and concerns about immunosuppressants (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18; p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS Heart recipients had a high prevalence of INA. Lower income, greater number of prescribed concomitant drugs, and more concerns about immunosuppressants correlated most with timing nonadherence and taking nonadherence among heart recipients. These findings will be helpful to intervene on and prevent future INA of heart recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing400014, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hong Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ryan S Nelson
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL33612, USA
| | - Yong Han
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yirong Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing400014, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hongping Xiang
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Cai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yonghua Yuan
- Department of Pharmacy, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing400014, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Yonghua Yuan Department of Pharmacy, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 136 Zhongshan Er Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing400014, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-023-68485161 Email
| |
Collapse
|