Screening for BK polyomavirus DNAemia: What should be done?

Brincidofovir inhibits polyomavirus infection in vivo

Polyomaviruses are species-specific DNA viruses that can cause disease in immunocompromised individuals. Despite their role as the causative agents for several diseases, there are no currently approved antivirals for treating polyomavirus infection. Brincidofovir (BCV) is an antiviral approved for the treatment of poxvirus infections and has shown activity against other double-stranded DNA viruses. In this study, we tested the efficacy of BCV against polyomavirus infection in vitro and in vivo using mouse polyomavirus (MuPyV). BCV inhibited virus production in primary mouse kidney cells and brain cortical cells. BCV treatment of cells transfected with MuPyV genomic DNA resulted in a reduction in virus levels, indicating that viral inhibition occurs post-entry. Although in vitro BCV treatment had a limited effect on viral DNA and RNA levels, drug treatment was associated with a reduction in viral protein, raising the possibility that BCV acts post-transcriptionally to inhibit MuPyV infection. In mice, BCV treatment was well tolerated, and prophylactic treatment resulted in a reduction in viral DNA levels and a potent suppression of infectious virus production in the kidney and brain. In mice with chronic polyomavirus infection, therapeutic administration of BCV decreased viremia and reduced infection in the kidney. These data demonstrate that BCV exerts antiviral activity against polyomavirus infection in vivo, supporting further investigation into the use of BCV to treat clinical polyomavirus infections.

IMPORTANCE

Widespread in the human population and able to persist asymptomatically for the life of an individual, polyomavirus infections cause a significant disease burden in the immunocompromised. Individuals undergoing immune suppression, such as kidney transplant patients or those treated for autoimmune diseases, are particularly at high risk for polyomavirus-associated diseases. Because no antiviral agent exists for treating polyomavirus infections, management of polyomavirus-associated diseases typically involves reducing or discontinuing immunomodulatory therapy. This can be perilous due to the risk of transplant rejection and the potential development of adverse immune reactions. Thus, there is a pressing need for the development of antivirals targeting polyomaviruses. Here, we investigate the effects of brincidofovir, an FDA-approved antiviral, on polyomavirus infection in vivo using mouse polyomavirus. We show that the drug is well-tolerated in mice, reduces infectious viral titers, and limits viral pathology, indicating the potential of brincidofovir as an anti-polyomavirus therapeutic.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of JC Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The vast majority of polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is due to BK virus, but rare cases result from JC virus reactivation. To date, only a handful of biopsy-proven JC-PVN cases have been reported. Here, we describe the clinical and pathologic findings in 7 patients with biopsy-proven JC-PVN.

METHODS

Search of the pathology archives at 2 institutions found 7 cases of JC-PVN. Clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records, and the biopsies were reviewed.

RESULTS

Four cases were diagnosed at 6 y posttransplant or later. The remaining 3 cases presented within approximately 2 y posttransplant, of which 2 showed subclinical JC-PVN on surveillance biopsy. Two early presenting patients were treated for acute rejection just before acquiring JC-PVN. Late presenting patients had higher chronicity, which correlated to worse outcome. All but 1 biopsy showed nonspecific inflammation within areas of interstitial fibrosis without significant inflammation in unscarred cortex. The earliest presenting patient was the exception and showed active inflammation with tubulitis. Viral cytopathic changes were detected in all cases with moderate or high-histologic viral load (pvl), showing preference for the distal tubules and medulla. The 2 cases with low pvl did not demonstrate cytopathic changes but were SV40 positive.

CONCLUSIONS

JC-PVN can be insidious in presentation, which may cause delayed or missed diagnosis. Unlike BK-PVN, which typically occurs early in the posttransplant period, JC-PVN can occur both early and late following transplant. Overreliance on negative plasma and urine BK viral loads to exclude PVN can be a pitfall.