Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound of the transplant pancreas in the post‐operative setting

Pancreas rejection: quieting the storm to preserve graft function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allograft rejection remains enigmatic and elusive following pancreas transplantation. In the absence of early technical pancreas graft failure, pancreas allograft rejection is the major cause of death-censored pancreas graft loss both short- and long-term. Despite this circumstance, there are variations in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreas rejection. In this article, we summarize recent literature, review common practices, and discuss various management algorithms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although pancreas allograft biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection, not all transplant centers have the capability to perform pancreas allograft biopsy. Some centers depend on clinical or laboratory parameters exclusively or rely on dysfunction or biopsy of a simultaneous kidney allograft as a marker for pancreas allograft rejection. New biomarkers are evolving to assess the risk for rejection and may help to diagnose early rejection. In the future, the use of machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence may play a role identifying patients at risk and detecting pancreas rejection without performing a pancreas allograft biopsy.

SUMMARY

Despite decades of experience in pancreas transplantation, the diagnosis and management of pancreas rejection remains challenging. Emerging biomarkers and machine learning algorithms are needed to mitigate immunological complications and guide immunosuppression in these patients.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant after bilateral lung transplant for a recipient with cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited autosomal recessive disorder. Despite optimized therapy, the majority of affected individuals ultimately die of respiratory failure. Lung transplantation is the only available therapy that deals definitively with the end-stage pulmonary disease and has become the treatment of choice for some of these patients. As patients with CF are living longer, extrapulmonary manifestations may develop including pancreatic failure, which manifests as exocrine insufficiency and CF-related diabetes (CFRD). Both of these can be managed through pancreas transplantation. We have previously reported our series of three simultaneous lung and pancreas transplants in patients with CF, which were complicated by surgical issues for both the thoracic and abdominal portions, rejection and resistant infections with disappointing long-term survival. Based on these results, a sequential approach was adopted: first, the thoracic transplant; and second, once the patient has recovered, the abdominal transplants. This is the first reported case of pancreas and kidney transplantation performed after a lung transplant in a patient with CF. It demonstrates a successful approach to treating CF with a lung transplant, and in an effort to improve the patient's long-term outcome, treating CFRD and pancreatic enzyme insufficiency, with a subsequent pancreas transplant.

Distal allograft pancreatectomy for graft salvage after pancreas transplantation

Early pancreas allograft failure most commonly results from vascular thrombosis. Immediate surgical intervention may permit pancreas allograft salvage, typically requiring thrombectomy. In cases of partial allograft necrosis secondary to splenic arterial thrombosis, distal allograft pancreatectomy may allow salvage of at least half of the pancreas allograft with retention of function. We retrospectively reviewed four cases of simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients who required distal allograft pancreatectomy for splenic artery thrombosis with necrosis of the distal pancreas. Three of the four maintained long-term allograft function with euglycemia independent of insulin at six months to six years of follow-up, and all patients continue to maintain normal renal allograft function. Early diagnosis and early intervention are essential in order to salvage the pancreas allograft in the case of thrombosis. Distal allograft pancreatectomy can be performed safely and result in excellent long-term outcomes in select patients.

Initial experience with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the first week after liver transplantation in children: a useful adjunct to Doppler ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Doppler US is the primary screening for post-liver transplant vascular complications, but indeterminate findings require further imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced US improves diagnostic assessment of vascular complications suspected by Doppler US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed Doppler US and contrast-enhanced US studies obtained in the first week following liver transplant. Doppler US was performed twice daily for the first 5 postoperative days, and CEUS in the first postoperative day and when vascular complications were suspected. We correlated Doppler US and CEUS with surgical findings, and clinical and imaging follow-up. We evaluated Doppler US and CEUS quality in demonstrating the main hepatic artery (HA) at the porta hepatis as follows: Grade 0 = not seen, Grade 1 = only segments, Grade 2 = entire main HA, and Grade 3 = entire main HA to the intrahepatic branching. We used a Wilcoxon signed rank test to test the difference between Doppler US and CEUS methods.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine children (15 girls, 14 boys) were identified, with median age 2.2 years (range 0.5-17.6 years). The most common transplant indication was biliary atresia (n=13). There was significantly (P<0.0001) improved main HA visualization with CEUS. In five children, CEUS was performed to evaluate suspected vascular complications; CEUS confirmed normal vascularity in two. CEUS demonstrated portal vein thrombosis (n=2) and main HA thrombosis (n=1), confirmed at surgery. In one child the main HA thrombosis was missed; marked HA narrowing was seen retrospectively on CEUS.

CONCLUSION

Immediately following liver transplantation, CEUS improves main HA visualization and diagnostic assessment of vascular complications.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Doppler Ultrasound for Detection of Early Vascular Complications of Pancreas Grafts

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare conventional duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for identifying vascular abnormalities in pancreas allografts in the immediate posttransplant setting. Identification of pancreas allografts at risk of failure may impact patient care because early intervention for vascular insufficiency can lead to graft salvage. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two radiologists who were blinded to patient outcomes performed a retrospective analysis of the postoperative Doppler ultrasound and CEUS images of 34 pancreas grafts from transplants performed between 2017 and 2019. A total of 28 patients who did not require surgical reexploration were considered the control group. Six patients had surgically proven arterial or venous abnormalities on surgical reexploration. Each radiologist scored grafts as having normal or abnormal vascularity on the basis of image sets obtained using Doppler ultrasound only and CEUS only. Comparisons of both the diagnostic performance of each modality and interobserver agreement were performed. RESULTS. Both readers showed that CEUS had increased sensitivity for detecting vascular abnormalities (83.3% for both readers) compared with Doppler ultrasound (66.7% and 50.0%). For both readers, the specificity of CEUS was similar to that of Doppler imaging (81.6% and 78.9% for reader 1 and reader 2 versus 76.3% and 84.2% for reader 1 and reader 2). For both readers, the negative predictive value of CEUS was higher than that of Doppler ultrasound (96.9% and 96.8% for reader 1 and reader 2 versus 93.5% and 91.4% for reader 1 and reader 2). Interobserver agreement was higher for CEUS than for Doppler ultrasound (κ = 0.54 vs κ = 0.28). CONCLUSION. CEUS may provide radiologists and surgeons with a means of timely and effective evaluation of pancreas graft perfusion after surgery, and it may help identify grafts that could benefit from surgical salvage.