Comparable survival outcome between transplantation from haploidentical donor and matched related donor or unrelated donor for severe aplastic anemia patients aged 40 years and older: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

Modified Delphi panel consensus recommendations for management of severe aplastic anemia

ABSTRACT

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare hematologic condition for which there is no clear management algorithm. A panel of 11 experts on adult and pediatric aplastic anemia was assembled and, using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles modified Delphi panel method, evaluated >600 varying patient care scenarios to develop clinical recommendations for the initial and subsequent management of patients of all ages with SAA. Here, we present the panel's recommendations to rule out inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, on supportive care before and during first-line therapy, and on first-line (initial management) and second-line (subsequent management) therapy of acquired SAA, focusing on when transplant vs medical therapy is most appropriate. These recommendations represent the consensus of 11 experts informed by published literature and experience. They are intended only as general guidance for experienced clinicians who treat patients with SAA and are in no way intended to supersede individual physician and patient decision making. Current and future research should validate this consensus using clinical data. Once validated, we hope these expert panel recommendations will improve outcomes for patients with SAA.

First-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia: immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag versus haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a multicenter prospective study

Matched-related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the preferred first-line option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients aged <40 years even in the era of eltrombopag (EPAG). However, there has not been any direct comparison between immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus EPAG (IST + EPAG) and haploidentical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) as first-line therapy. This study prospectively compared the efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Haplo-HSCT (n = 147) and IST + EPAG (n = 121) as first-line treatment for patients with SAA. The results showed that 86.3% of patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 24.1% of patients in the IST + EPAG group achieved normal complete blood count (CBC) (P < 0.001) after 6 months of treatment. The time to achieve transfusion independence and absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 109/L were shorter in the Haplo-HSCT group than in the IST + EPAG group (P < 0.05). In the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.4 ± 2.4% and 82.8 ± 3.1% (P = 0.017), whereas 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 69.4 ± 4.2% and 81.6 ± 3.2% (P = 0.002), respectively. Similar results were observed in patients with <40 years of age. Among patients with ≥40 years of age, there was no difference in 3-year OS (88.6 ± 4.8% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.517) between the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT groups, whereas 3-year FFS was lower in the IST + EPAG (58.7 ± 7.5% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.043). Subgroup analysis for populations aged <40 years indicated that SAA benefited more from IST + EPAG, and very SAA (vSAA) benefited more from Haplo-HSCT. Patients treated with haplo-HSCT scored significantly better in the HRQoL than treated with IST + EPAG (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line Haplo-HSCT was associated with normal CBC at 6 months, better FFS and led to a better HRQoL (P < 0.001). In summary, the IST + EPAG achieved better OS for <40 years SAA patients, while the Haplo-HSCT accelerated hematopoietic recovery and HRQoL, achieved better FFS even for those <40 years vSAA and ≥40 years patients.

Alternative donor transplantation for severe aplastic anemia: a comparative study of the SAAWP EBMT

ABSTRACT

Selecting the most suitable alternative donor becomes challenging in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) when a matched sibling donor (MSD) is unavailable. We compared outcomes in patients with SAA undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT) from matched unrelated donors (MUD) (n = 1106), mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) (n = 340), and haploidentical donors (Haplo) (n = 206) registered in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database (2012-2021). For Haplo SCT, only those receiving posttransplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis were included. Median age was 20 years, and the median time from diagnosis to transplantation 8.7 months. Compared with MUD, MMUD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-5.6) and Haplo (HR, 5.15; 95% CI, 2.5-10.58) showed significantly higher risks of primary graft failure. MUD had lower rates of acute GVHD compared with MMUD and Haplo (grade 2-4: 13%, 22%, and 19%, respectively; P < .001; grade 3-4: 5%, 9%, and 7%, respectively; P = .028). The 3-year nonrelapse mortality rate was 14% for MUD, 19% for MMUD, and 27% for Haplo (P < .001), whereas overall survival and GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates were 81% and 73% for MUD, 74% and 65% for MMUD, and 63% and 54% for Haplo, respectively (P < .001). In addition to donor type, multivariable analysis identified other factors associated with GRFS such as patient age, performance status, and interval between diagnosis and transplantation. For patients with SAA lacking an MSD, our findings support MUDs as the preferable alternative donor option. However, selecting between an MMUD and Haplo donor remains uncertain and requires further exploration.

Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin Promotes Platelet Engraftment in Severe Aplastic Anemia Patients Following Treatment With Haploid Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation using Modified Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human TPO (rhTPO) promotes platelet engraftment in patients after allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT). However, the effects of rhTPO on platelet recovery after Haplo-HSCT in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) have not been intensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rhTPO on platelet engraftment in patients with SAA who were treated with Haplo-HSCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy).

STUDY DESIGN

SAA patients who received Haplo-HSCT plus PTCy regimen were divided into the rhTPO group (with subcutaneous injection of rhTPO, n = 28) and Control group (no rhTPO administration, n = 27). The engraftment of platelet/neutrophil, platelet infusion amount, and transplant-related complications between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

All 55 patients showed successful hematopoietic reconstitution. The median time of platelet engraftment was 11 (9 to 29) days in the rhTPO group and 14 (9 to 28) days in the Control group (P = .003). The rhTPO group had a significantly reduced amount of infused platelets compared to the Control group (2 (1 to 11.5) versus 3 (1 to 14) therapeutic doses; P = .004). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding median time of neutrophil engraftment, incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), incidence of cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, 3-yr overall survival rate, and failure-free-survival rate. No obvious adverse reactions were observed in the rhTPO group.

CONCLUSION

rhTPO promoted platelet engraftment, reduced the amount of transfused platelets, and demonstrated good safety profiles without evidence of adverse reactions in patients with SAA who received Haplo-HSCT using PTCy regimen.

Letermovir Effectively Prevents Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients with Aplastic Anemia After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we investigated the efficacy of letermovir in preventing Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in patients with aplastic anemia (AA) who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

METHODS

Based on whether or not letermovir was used for preventing CMV infection, the patients were categorized into two groups: letermovir and control groups. The overall survival (OS) rate and cumulative incidence of CMV infection during the first 100 days after allo-HSCT were evaluated. The study included 21 matched pairs of patients, identified through propensity score matching analysis, to compare CMV infection rates, treatment efficacy, and regression.

RESULTS

The incidence of CMV infection within 100 days after transplantation was significantly lower in the letermovir group than in the control group (26.5 vs. 77.4%, respectively; P < 0.001), among a total of 87 patients who underwent the transplant. In the matched cohort of 21 patients with AA, the letermovir group also showed a significantly reduced cumulative incidence of CMV infection (14.3 vs. 90.5% in the control group; P < 0.001). Compared to the control group, patients with CMV infection in the letermovir group had lower CMV-DNA load and a shorter clearance time. However, there was no significant difference in OS between both groups (P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Letermovir effectively prevents CMV infection in allo-HSCT recipients with AA and demonstrates a high safety profile.

Meta-analysis of the results of haploidentical transplantation in the treatment of aplastic anemia

This meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcome of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) for aplastic anemia (AA) compared with matched related donor (MRD)-HSCT, matched unrelated donor (MUD)-HSCT, and immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to 22 June 2022. Relative risk (RR) was used to indicate the effect indicator, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) being applied to express the effect size. A subgroup analysis based on the literature quality (low, fair, and high) was applied. Totally, 25 studies were included in this study, comprising 2252 patients. Our findings demonstrated no difference between Haplo-HSCT and MRD-HSCT in 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and engraftment. However, Haplo-HSCT had higher incidences of II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and cytomegalovirus infection. There were no differences in 3- and 5-year OS, 3-year FFS, platelet engraftment, graft failure (GF), II-IV grade of aGVHD, and complication between Haplo-HSCT and MUD-HSCT; however, Haplo-HSCT had a lower incidence of cGVHD. Compared with IST, Haplo-HSCT had a higher 3-year FFS and 3- and 6-month response rate. However, there were no differences in 3- and 5-year OS, and 12-month response rate between Haplo-HSCT and IST. This study suggests that Haplo-HSCT may be a realistic therapeutic option for AA, which may provide a reference for decision-making.

Low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide with G-CSF/ATG based haploidentical protocol provides favorable outcomes for SAA patients

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT), as one of the life-saving treatments for severe aplastic anemia (SAA), is widely used because of its great donor availability. Over decades, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based protocol (the so-called Beijing Protocol) has achieved favorable engraftment and survival outcomes. In this study, we modified the conventional Beijing Protocol: the full-dose Cyclophosphamide (Cy) (200 mg/kg in total) was divided into 42.75 mg/kg Cy on day -5 to day -2 and Low dose post-transplant Cy (PTCy) (14.5 mg/kg on days +3 and +4), hoping to reduce the incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and to guarantee successful and stable engraftment. Here we retrospectively reported and analyzed the data of first 17 patients with SAA who had received haplo-HSCT using this novel regimen between August 2020 and August 2022. The median follow-up was 522 days (range, 138-859 days). No patient developed primary graft failure. Four (23.5%) patients developed grade II bladder toxicity, two (11.8%) patients developed grade II cardiotoxicity. All patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftment at median times of 12 days (range, 11-20 days) and14 days (range, 8-36 days). During our follow-up, no patients developed grade III-IV aGVHD. The cumulative incidence of grade II and grade I aGVHD at 100 days was 23.5% (95% CI, 6.8%-49.9%) and 47.1% (95% CI, 23.0%-72.2%). Three patients (17.6%) developed chronic GVHD of skin, mouth, and eyes and all of which were mild. All patients are alive by the end of the follow-up, with a failure-free survival of 100%, which was defined as survival without treatment failures, such as death, graft failure, or relapse rate. The rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation was 82.4% (95% CI, 64.3%-100%). The rate of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation was 17.6% (95% CI, 3.8%-43.4%). No CMV disease and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred among these patients. In conclusion, the encouraging results of prolonged survival outcomes and reduced incidence of GVHD suggest promising effect of this novel regimen in haplo-HSCT for patients with SAA. Larger-sample prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this regimen.

Comparisons Between modified PTCY and G-CSF/ATG Regimens for Haploidentical Transplantation in Patients with Aplastic Anemia

BACKGROUND

Haploidentical transplantation has become an alternative treatment option for aplastic anemia patients without matched sibling donors or matched unrelated donors. Recently, the post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) regimen and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG) regimen have become the most common protocols used worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

We designed this retrospective study to compare the outcomes of patients receiving a modified post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (mPTCY) regimen versus the G-CSF/ATG regimen.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical data of 130 aplastic anemia patients who underwent haplo-HSCT and received the mPTCY regimen (n=55) or G-CSF/ATG regimen (n=75) between Jan 2013 and Jun 2021 across seven transplant centers.

RESULTS

Neutrophil engraftment was successful in all patients within 30 days in the G-CSF/ATG group. The cumulative neutrophil engraftment rate in the mPTCY group was 96.36% (95% CI, 94.57-97.57, P=0.010). The median time of neutrophil engraftment in the G-CSF/ATG group was 10 (7-28) days, which was more rapid than that observed in the mPTCY group (P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD) between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of II-IV acute GVHD was 18.40% (95% CI, 4.27-40.31) in the mPTCY group and 19.32% (95% CI, 5.86-38.58) in the G-CSF/ATG group, while the cumulative incidence of III-IV acute GVHD was 7.31% (95% CI, 0.09-37.48) in the mPTCY group and 7.57% (95% CI, 0.20-34.19) in the G-CSF/ATG group. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS). The 2-year OS, FFS and GRFS rates were 95.91% (95% CI, 84.59-98.96), 92.25% (95% CI, 80.59-97.03) and 86.68% (95% CI, 73.98-93.44), respectively, in the mPTCY group and 86.67% (95% CI, 76.64-92.59), 81.28% (95% CI, 70.45-88.46) and 77.20% (95% CI, 65.89-85.16), respectively, in the G-CSF/ATG group. The transplantation-related mortality (TRM) rate was significantly higher in the G-CSG/ATG group than in the mPTCY group (13.33% in the G-CSG/ATG group versus 1.96% in the mPTCY group, P=0.022). In multivariate analysis, female donors, a higher hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and III-IV aGVHD were associated with worse survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the mPTCY and G-CSF/ATG regimens led to similar outcomes in AA patients, but quicker engraftment was observed with the ATG/G-CSF regimen, and a lower incidence of TRM was observed with the mPTCY regimen.

Comparable Outcomes in Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia Patients With Haploidentical Donor or Matched Related Donor Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience

Clinical data of patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID-HSCT) with matched related sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) in complications and survivals. Thirty consecutive patients were enrolled in the study with a median follow-up of 50 months (range 4, 141), and the median age of the patients was 21 years (range 3, 49). All the patients achieved myeloid engraftment in the two cohorts. The cumulative incidences of platelet engraftment were 95.5 and 100% in HID cohort and MSD cohort, respectively. The median time for neutrophil and platelet recovery was 11 (range 9, 19) and 15 (range 10, 25) days in HID cohort, and 12 (range 10, 19) and 14 (range 8, 25) days in MSD cohort. The cumulative incidences of grade II–IV and grade III–IV acute graft vs. host disease (aGvHD) in HID cohort and in MSD cohort were 18.9 vs. 14.3% (p = 0.77) and 10.5 vs. 0% (p = 0.42), respectively. The cumulative incidences of chronic graft vs. host disease (cGvHD) was 22.7% in HID cohort and 25.5% in MSD cohort (p = 0.868). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) rates in HID cohort and MSD cohort were 85.1 vs. 87.5% (p = 0.858), 80.3 vs. 87.5% (p = 0.635), respectively. The median time to achieve engraftment, cumulative incidence of aGvHD and cGvHD, and the 5-year OS and FFS rates were not significantly different between the two cohorts. We suggest that HID-HSCT might be a safety and effective option for SAA patients without a matched donor.

Comparable Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life for Severe Aplastic Anemia: Haploidentical Combined With a Single Cord Blood Unit vs Matched Related Transplants

We retrospectively compared the outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a single unrelated cord blood unit (Haplo-cord HSCT) (n = 180) or matched related donor (MRD)-HSCT (n = 128). After propensity score matching, we were able to match 88 patients in each group and to compare the outcomes between the two matched-pair groups. Haplo-cord recipients exhibited a longer median days for neutrophil engraftment (12 vs 11, P = 0.001) and for platelet engraftment (15 vs 13, P = 0.003). Haplo-cord recipients a high cumulative incidence of grades II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (29.8 vs 14.0%, P = 0.006), while similar III–IV acute GVHD, total chronic GVHD, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at four-year (all P < 0.05). Among the Haplo-cord HSCT and MRD-HSCT groups, the four-year GVHD-free/failure-free survival rates were 73.5% and 66.9% (P = 0.388) respectively, and the overall survival rates were 81.5% and 77.2% (P = 0.484), respectively. Similar comparable results also were observed between the corresponding first-line, older or younger than 40 years old subgroups. The Haplo-cord HSCT group exhibited higher scores in the physical component summary, physical functioning, general health and social functioning than the MRD-HSCT group (all P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, young age and Haplo-cord HSCT were favorable factors for HRQoL, while moderate to severe cGVHD was associated with lower HRQoL. These results suggest that for SAA patients, Haplo-cord HSCT could achieve at least comparable efficacy and HRQoL to MRD-HSCT.

The consensus from The Chinese Society of Hematology on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 2021 update

The consensus recommendations in 2018 from The Chinese Society of Hematology (CSH) on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) facilitated the standardization of clinical practices of allo-HSCT in China and progressive integration with the world. There have been new developments since the initial publication. To integrate recent developments and further improve the consensus, a panel of experts from the CSH recently updated the consensus recommendations, which are summarized as follows: (1) there is a new algorithm for selecting appropriate donors for allo-HSCT candidates. Haploidentical donors (HIDs) are the preferred donor choice over matched sibling donors (MSDs) for patients with high-risk leukemia or elderly patients with young offspring donors in experienced centers. This replaces the previous algorithm for donor selection, which favored MSDs over HIDs. (2) Patients with refractory/relapsed lymphoblastic malignancies are now encouraged to undergo salvage treatment with novel immunotherapies prior to HSCT. (3) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the application of allo-HSCT in specific groups of patients with hematological malignancies (intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), favorable-risk AML with positive minimal residual disease, and standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia). (4) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the application of HSCT in patients with nonmalignant diseases, such as severe aplastic anemia and inherited diseases. (5) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the administration of anti-thymocyte globulin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in HID-HSCT.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity in China 2019: a report from the Chinese Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry Group

Between 2008 and 2019, 58,914 hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCTs) were reported to the Chinese Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry Group (CBMTRG) throughout China. In this report, we focus on 2019 data and describe current trends in HSCT in China. There was continued growth in transplant activity in China, with a rapid increase in haploidentical HSCT. In 2019, a total of 12,323 cases of HSCT were reported from 149 transplant teams, 78% (9597 cases) were allogeneic HSCTs. Haploidentical donor (HID) HSCT accounted for 60% (5771 cases) of allogeneic HSCT. The most common indications for allogeneic HSCT for malignant disease were acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (37%) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (24%), and the largest proportion of non-malignant diseases comprised aplastic anemia (AA) (13%). Multiple stem cell source composed 70% of HID and 28% of MSD, which was typical in China. The BuCy based regimen (59%) was the most popular conditioning regimen for allogeneic HSCT, followed by the BuFlu based regimen (23%) and TBI-based regimen (12%). This survey clearly shows comprehensive information about the current state and recent trends for HSCT in China. Further efforts should be made to obtain detailed information.

Special issues related to the diagnosis and management of acquired aplastic anemia in countries with restricted resources, a report on behalf of the Eastern Mediterranean blood and marrow transplantation (EMBMT) group and severe aplastic anemia working party of the European Society for blood and marrow transplantation (SAAWP of EBMT)

Aplastic anemia is a relatively rare but potentially fatal disorder, with a reported higher incidence in developing countries in comparison to the West. There are significant variations in epidemiological as well as etiological factors of bone marrow failure syndromes in the developing countries in comparison to the developed world. Furthermore, the management of bone marrow failure syndromes in resource constraint settings has significant challenges including delayed diagnosis and referral, limited accessibility to healthcare facilities, treatment modalities as well as limitations related to patients who require allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Here we will provide a review of the available evidence related to specific issues of aplastic anemia in the developing countries and we summarize suggested recommendations from the Eastern Mediterranean blood and bone marrow transplantation (EMBMT) group and the severe aplastic anemia working party of the European Society of blood and marrow transplantation (SAAWP of EBMT) related to the diagnosis and therapeutic options in countries with restricted resources.

Mesenchymal stromal cells as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients with severe aplastic anemia?-a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an emerging prophylaxis option for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), but studies have reported inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of MSCs as prophylaxis for GVHD in SAA patients with haplo-HSCT.

METHODS

Studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and http://clinicaltrials.gov from establishment to February 2020. Twenty-nine single-arm studies (n = 1456) were included, in which eight (n = 241) studies combined with MSCs and eleven (n = 1215) reports without MSCs in haplo-HSCT for SAA patients. The primary outcomes were the incidences of GVHD. Other outcomes included 2-year overall survival (OS) and the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the results pooled through random or fixed effects models.

RESULTS

Between MSCs and no MSCs groups, no significant differences were found in the pooled incidences of acute GVHD (56.0%, 95% CI 48.6-63.5% vs. 47.2%, 95% CI 29.0-65.4%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91-2.25; p = 0.123), grade II-IV acute GVHD (29.8%, 95% CI 24.1-35.5% vs. 30.6%, 95% CI 26.6-34.6%; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70-1.32; p = 0.889), and chronic GVHD (25.4%, 95% CI 19.8-31.0% vs. 30.0%, 95% CI 23.3-36.6%; OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56-1.11; p = 0.187). Furtherly, there was no obvious difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60-1.61; p = 1.000) and incidence of CMV infection (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-1.92; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicates that the prophylactic use of MSC co-transplantation is not an effective option for SAA patients undergoing haplo-HSCT. Hence, the general co-transplantation of MSCs for SAA haplo-HSCT recipients may lack evidence-based practice.

Haploidentical Transplantation with Modified Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Patients with Primary Aplastic Anemia: A Multicenter Experience

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a life-threatening hematological disorder that can be cured by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haploidentical transplantation becomes an alternative choice for patients in the absence of a matched sibling donor. We used a retrospective study aimed to confirm the feasibility of busulfan-based modified post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) strategy in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for AA patients. We analyzed the outcomes of 27 patients from 3 clinical centers who had undergone haploidentical transplantation between October 2018 and July 2020. The modified condition regimen consisted of anti-thymoglobulin/antilymphocyte globulin, fludarabine, busulfan and low-dose cyclophosphamide, and high-dose cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus were administered as graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after transplantation. The median follow-up time was 370 (range 65-721) days. One patient developed primary graft failure, and successful engraftment was observed in 96.29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.45%-97.91%) of patients. The median times for neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 13 (range 11-18) days and 13 (range 11-28) days, respectively. The most common regimen-related toxicity was bladder toxicity, followed by stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 25.93% (95% CI, 5.84%-52.64%), whereas the cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was 7.4% (95% CI, 0%-52.16%). Chronic GVHD was observed in 3 patients by the end of follow-up. All 27 patients are alive, with a failure-free survival rate of 96.30% (95% CI, 6.49%-99.47%) and GVHD relapse-free survival rate of 88.89% (95% CI, 69.39%-96.28%). Virus reactivation was comparable, with rates of 53.54% for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and 41.57% for Epstein-Barr virus, but the CMV diseases and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder were rare. Our study using haploidentical transplantation with modified PTCY demonstrated an encouraging result with prolonged survival and reduced complications for aplastic anemia patients.

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation for aplastic anemia: the current advances and future challenges

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Finding a suitable matched donor in a timely manner is a challenge. The availability of haploidentical donors and their successful use in transplantation have expanded valid choices for SAA. In recent decades, haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) for the treatment of SAA has been continuously attempted, and great strides have been made. Nowadays, haplo-HSCT using different regimens has overcome the difficulty of graft failure and severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and achieved inspiring survival outcomes in SAA. The regimens consist mainly of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus antithymocyte globulin (ATG), posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), and ex vivo graft T-cell depletion (TCD). In particular, the G-CSF and ATG-based regimen includes the largest sample size and the successful wide use of the G-CSF and ATG-based regimen has promoted haplo-HSCT a higher priority in SAA patients without matched related or unrelated donors in China. Recent studies have also indicated that haplo-HSCT using PT-Cy or TCD regimen is a practicable alternative, but the sample size is relatively small. Here, we offer an overview of clinical results obtained through the use of haploidentical transplantation in SAA, mainly focusing on current advances and future challenges.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aplastic anemia: current indications and transplant strategies

Treatment options for newly diagnosed aplastic anemia (AA) patient includes upfront allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or immunosuppressive therapy (IST). With recent advances in supportive care, conditioning regimens and post-transplant immunosuppression the overall survival for HSCT approaches 70-90%. Transplant eligibility needs to be assessed considering age, comorbidities, donor availability and probability of response to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Upfront HSCT should be offered to children and young adults with matched related donor (MRD). Upfront HSCT may also be offered to children and young adults with rapidly available matched unrelated donor (MUD) who require urgent HSCT. Bone marrow (BM) graft source and cyclosporine (CsA) plus methotrexate (MTX) as graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis are preferable when using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) based conditioning regimens. Alemtuzumab is an acceptable alternative to ATG and is used with CsA alone and with either BM or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Cyclophosphamide (CY) plus ATG conditioning is preferable for patients receiving MRD transplant, while Fludarabine (Flu) based conditioning is reserved for older adults, those with risk factors of graft failure and those receiving MUD HSCT. For haploidentical transplant, use of low dose radiotherapy and post-transplant cyclophosphamide has resulted in a marked reduction in graft failure and GVHD.