1
|
Tahir MJ, Aftab Z, Nabi Z. Beyond the gift: exploring mental health and quality of life after kidney donation in a resource limited country. J Nephrol 2025:10.1007/s40620-025-02217-5. [PMID: 40307661 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-025-02217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplant is a life changing treatment. It improves the quality of life and ideally restores the kidney function of recipients. However, it also poses challenges, especially for the donors. Pakistan is a resource-limited country and donors have to face some specific social and cultural challenges. Knowledge about the donor's mental health and quality of life after donation is limited. This study aims to explore the mental health and quality of life after kidney donation. METHODS The study was retrospective and cross-sectional, carried out between August and December 2023. One hundred donors from a single center were selected through convenience sampling. Two questionnaires, namely the Beck Depression Inventory and Satisfaction with life scale were employed during an interview with donors. Data were analyzed using SPSS- 27. RESULTS Overall, 70 females and 30 males participated. Only 9 donors (9%), reported significant disturbance in their mental health, amongst which 2 were males and 7 were females. Of note, two recipients of their donation passed away, while another experienced graft failure. Insomnia and tiredness were significant contributors to the donors' inability to work, with a reported percentage of 25%. In addition, dissatisfaction with life was reported by 8 donors only. There was no significant association between depression and satisfaction with life and age, marital and education status and time since transplant. Only status of the graft in the recipient was associated with an impact on the donor's mental health. Thirteen donors exhibited depression post-nephrectomy, with 4% experiencing mild disturbance and 9% showing major mood disturbances including borderline clinical depression and moderate depression. Notably, none of the donors had test scores indicating extreme depression. CONCLUSION Kidney donation has no severe impact in terms of mental health and quality of life in donors. Apart from the status of the graft, none of the demographic characteristics had a significant impact on the mental health of donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zoha Aftab
- KRL Hospital Islamabad, House Number 7, Street 15 A, F- 7/2, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Zahid Nabi
- KRL Hospital Islamabad, House Number 7, Street 15 A, F- 7/2, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levea SL, Prasadh JG, Wang BK, Salcedo-Betancourt JD, Matevish L, Sanchez Vivaldi J, Lieber SR, Shah JA, Hwang CS, Wojciechowski D, Vagefi PA, Patel MS. A Contemporary Analysis of Mental Well-being Among Living Donor Kidney Applicants. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1631. [PMID: 38757049 PMCID: PMC11098232 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Living donation is paramount for expanding the donor pool. The aim of this study was to assess changes over time in self-reported mental health of living donor kidney applicants in efforts to inform patient-centered discussions with potential donors. Methods Kidney donor applications from 2017 through 2021 were compiled. Data included age, gender, race, ethnicity, applicant-recipient relationship, medical history, and medications. Trends over time were analyzed and post hoc analyses were performed. Results During the study period, 2479 applicants to the living donor kidney program were evaluated; 73% of applicants were female individuals. More than half of applicants were not related to their intended recipient; this fraction increased from 46% in 2017 to 58% in 2021 (P < 0.01). A similar decline in family relations was not present among Black and Latino applicants. Of all applicants, 18% reported depression and 18% reported anxiety; 20% reported taking antidepressants or anxiolytics. Depression and anxiety increased 170% (P < 0.001) and 136% (P < 0.001) from 2018 to 2019, respectively; antidepressant and anxiolytic use rose 138% (P < 0.001) between 2018 and 2020. Conclusions The profile of living donor applicants has changed in recent years, with approximately 1 in 5 requiring antidepressants or anxiolytics. Predonation counseling and postdonation monitoring are imperative to decrease adverse psychological outcomes for living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swee-Ling Levea
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jai G. Prasadh
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Benjamin K. Wang
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Lauren Matevish
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jorge Sanchez Vivaldi
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Sarah R. Lieber
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jigesh A. Shah
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Christine S. Hwang
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David Wojciechowski
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Parsia A. Vagefi
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Madhukar S. Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zimbrean PC, Rubman S, Andacoglu O, Bakhai D, Clifton E, Deng Y, Doshi M, Emamaullee J, Gan G, Holmes R, Jaber L, Jackson WE, Joyce M, Kalil R, Kumar V, Laflen J, Lentine KL, Prashar R, Winder GS, Yadav A, Liapakis A. Psychosocial evaluation of living liver donors-State of current practices in the United States. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:505-518. [PMID: 37861339 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
We surveyed living donor liver transplant programs in the United States to describe practices in the psychosocial evaluation of living donors focused on (1) composition of psychosocial team; (2) domains, workflow, and tools of the psychosocial assessment; (3) absolute and relative mental health-related contraindications to donation; and (4) postdonation psychosocial follow-up. We received 52 unique responses, representing 33 of 50 (66%) of active living donor liver transplant programs. Thirty-one (93.9%) provider teams included social workers, 22 (66.7%) psychiatrists, and 14 (42.4%) psychologists. Validated tools were rarely used, but domains assessed were consistent. Respondents rated active alcohol (93.8%), cocaine (96.8%), and opioid (96.8%) use disorder, as absolute contraindications to donation. Active suicidality (97%), self-injurious behavior (90.9%), eating disorders (87.9%), psychosis (84.8%), nonadherence (71.9%), and inability to cooperate with the evaluation team (78.1%) were absolute contraindications to donation. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute psychosocial contraindications to liver donation between geographical areas or between large and small programs. Programs conduct postdonation psychosocial follow-up (57.6%) or screening (39.4%), but routine follow-up of declined donors is rarely conducted (15.8%). Psychosocial evaluation of donor candidates is a multidisciplinary process. The structure of the psychosocial evaluation of donors is not uniform among programs though the domains assessed are consistent. Psychosocial contraindications to living liver donation vary among the transplant programs. Mental health follow-up of donor candidates is not standardized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula C Zimbrean
- Departments of Psychiatry and Surgery (Transplant), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susan Rubman
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Oya Andacoglu
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Darshit Bakhai
- Department of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Erin Clifton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mona Doshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- Department of Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC/Children's Hospital-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Geliang Gan
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rachel Holmes
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lana Jaber
- Department of Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael Joyce
- Department of Social Work, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Roberto Kalil
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jennie Laflen
- Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Internal Medicine, SM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rohini Prashar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Gerald S Winder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Anju Yadav
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zimbrean PC. Depression in transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:535-545. [PMID: 36227755 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review and summarize the literature published between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2022, on the prevalence, risk factors and impact of depression in transplant population. RECENT FINDINGS Depression is common in transplantation candidates and recipients, with a prevalence up to 85.8% in kidney recipients. Multiple studies have indicated after transplantation depression correlates with increased mortality and with higher healthcare utilization. Social risk factors for posttransplant depression include financial difficulties and unemployment, while less is understood about the biological substrate of depression in this population. There is evidence that dynamic psychotherapy is effective for depression in organ transplant recipients, while cognitive behavioral therapy or supportive therapy did not lead to improvement of depression in transplant recipients. For living organ donors, the rates of depression are similar to the general population, with financial factors and the clinical status of the recipient playing a significant role. SUMMARY Depression is a common finding in transplant population. More research is needed to understand the biological substrate and risk factors and to develop effective treatment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula C Zimbrean
- Departments of Psychiatry and Surgery (Transplantation), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abdel-Khalek EE, Abdel-Wahab M, Elgazzar MH, Khattab MA, El-Gilany AH, Elgouhari HM, Shehta A. Long-term follow-up of living liver donors: A single-center experience. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:1490-1499. [PMID: 35289076 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Living donors are healthy individuals who are exposed to a major surgical procedure during which a major part of their liver is resected. Data on the long-term consequences of living liver donation are scarce. This study examined clinical, laboratory, and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 237 living liver donors and 239 matched controls during 48-168 months of postdonation follow-up. We used the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), version 1. The scores for the four following subscales were higher in nondonors than in donors: physical functioning (p = 0.009), role limitations due to physical health (p = 0.002), energy/fatigue (p < 0.001), and bodily pain (p < 0.001). The scores on the eight subscales of the SF-36 were higher in donors with living recipients than in donors whose recipients died (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that living donor right hepatectomy is safe and results in a postdonation HRQoL similar to that of nondonors in those donors whose recipients are healthy, whereas donors whose recipients die have a lower HRQoL that is significantly negatively correlated with the time since recipient death and improves over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehab E Abdel-Khalek
- Liver Transplant UnitDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of Medicine University of Mansoura Mansoura Egypt Liver Transplant UnitGastrointestinal Surgery CenterDepartment of SurgeryFaculty of Medicine University of Mansoura Mansoura Egypt Department of Internal MedicineFaculty of Medicine University of Minia Minia Egypt Department of Public HealthFaculty of Medicine University of Mansoura Mansoura Egypt Texoma Liver Center Denison Texas USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ong JQL, Lim LJH, Ho RCM, Ho CSH. Depression, anxiety, and associated psychological outcomes in living organ transplant donors: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2021; 70:51-75. [PMID: 33721612 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
With increasing demands for living organ donations, understanding the prevalence of depression and anxiety, which are the commonest psychiatric disorders in donors following organ transplantation, will serve to improve psychiatric care to safeguard donors' mental wellbeing. This descriptive systematic review examines all observational studies in English investigating prevalence of depression and anxiety in adult transplant donors using bibliographic databases. Sixty-two papers were included (kidney, n = 25; liver, n = 25; bone marrow, n = 7; uterus, n = 2; lung, n = 1; kidney and lung concurrently, n = 2). Post-transplantation depression and anxiety prevalence rates (Depression: 0-46.9%, Anxiety: 0-66.7%) did not differ significantly from pre-transplantation and were largely comparable to the general population. Other psychiatric disorders observed included bipolar disorder, conversion disorder, adjustment disorder and sleep disorder. Other psychological outcomes observed included lower quality of life, lower satisfaction of life and regret after donation. Pre-donation risk factors such as poor physical/psychological health status, and post-donation risk factors such as complicated post-surgical recovery and poor physical/psychological health in recipients were identified, predisposing donors to poor psychological outcomes. Individuals with risk factors should be monitored and provided with social support, psychoeducation, psychotherapy and long-term follow up. Future studies should adopt consistent methodological approaches to improve comparability between various studies. More research investigating poor psychological outcomes in other organ donors besides kidney and liver donors, donors who have past psychiatric history, unrelated and parent donors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Q L Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Roger C M Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Institute of Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cyrus S H Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|