Tacrolimus time-in-therapeutic range is associated with freedom from acute rejection and graft failure following intestinal transplantation

Effect of Tacrolimus Time in Therapeutic Range on Postoperative Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Liver Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Liver cancer is the second highest cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is commonly treated with liver transplantation, where tacrolimus is typically used as an antirejection immunosuppressant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of tacrolimus time in therapeutic range (TTR) on liver cancer recurrence in liver transplant recipients and to compare the performance of TTRs calculated according to the target ranges recommended in published guidelines.

METHODS

A total of 84 patients who underwent liver transplantation for liver cancer were retrospectively included. Tacrolimus TTR was calculated using linear interpolation from the date of transplantation until recurrence or the last follow-up according to target ranges recommended in the Chinese guideline and international expert consensus.

RESULT

Twenty-four recipients developed liver cancer recurrence after liver transplantation. The CTTR (TTR calculated according to the Chinese guideline) for the recurrence group was significantly lower than that of the nonrecurrence group (26.39% vs. 50.27%, P < 0.001), whereas the ITTR (TTR calculated according to the international consensus) was not significantly different between the two groups (47.81% vs. 56.37%, P = 0.165). Multivariate survival analysis revealed that age, microvascular invasion, hepatocellular carcinoma, CTTR, and mean tacrolimus trough concentration were independent predictors of liver cancer recurrence after liver transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

TTR predicts liver cancer recurrence in liver transplant recipients. The range of tacrolimus concentrations recommended in the Chinese guideline was more beneficial than that recommended in the international consensus for Chinese patients undergoing liver transplantation for liver cancer.

Risk factors for renal dysfunction after isolated intestinal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Kidney dysfunction is a known complication of intestinal transplantation; however, the rate of development and risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain poorly defined.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of isolated adult intestinal allograft recipients from 2011 to 2019. Patients who died or experienced graft loss within 1-year or had a prior transplant were excluded. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation at 0-, 6- and 12-months post-transplant, and multivariable linear regression was performed to identify variables associated with adjusted eGFR at 1-year. Independent variables included age, ethnicity, BMI, history of diabetes/hypertension, vasopressor use, TPN and stoma days, urinary or bloodstream infections, intravenous contrast exposure, rejection, concomitant immunosuppression, and time above the therapeutic range of tacrolimus. Variables with a p < .1 in univariate analysis were considered for multivariable modeling.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included with a mean age of 43.9 ± 13.0. A mean 42.3% decline in eGFR was observed at 1-year post-transplant, with 15.2% of patients developing new stage 4/5 CKD. Factors associated with a greater decline in adjusted eGFR in the univariate model included increasing age, decreased BMI, stoma days, and vasopressor use. In the adjusted multivariable model patient age (β = -.77, p < .01) and stoma days (β = -.06, p < .01) remained significant. Tacrolimus and sirolimus exposure were not associated with decline in eGFR at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal dysfunction is common following intestinal transplantation. The need for stoma creation should be carefully considered, and reversal should be performed when feasible for renal protection.

Small bowel transplant - novel indications and recent progress

INTRODUCTION

Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years.

AREAS COVERED

Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.

Update on immunosuppressive strategies in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The intestine is the most immunologically complex solid organ allograft with the greatest risk of both rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). High levels of immunosuppression are required, further increasing morbidity. Due to low volume of transplants and few centers with experience, there is paucity of evidence-based, standardized, and effective therapeutic regimens. We herein review the most recent data about immunosuppression, focusing on novel and emerging therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data are moving the field toward increasing use of basilixumab and consideration of alemtuzumab for induction and inclusion of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and antimetabolites for maintenance. For rejection, we highlight novel roles for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibition, α4β7 integrin inhibition, microbiome modulation, desensitization protocols, and tolerance induction strategies. We also highlight emerging novel therapies for GVHD, especially the promising role of Janus kinase inhibition.

SUMMARY

New insights into immune pathways associated with rejection and GVHD in intestinal allografts have led to an evolution of therapies from broad-based immunosuppression to more targeted strategies that hold promise for reducing morbidity from infection, rejection, and GVHD. These should be the focus of further study to facilitate their widespread use.