Pancreas transplantation perceptions and practice: Results from a national US survey

Navigating pancreas transplant perceptions: assessing public sentiment and strategies using AI-driven analysis

Background

Pancreas transplantation, a crucial treatment for diabetes, is underutilized due to its invasiveness, strict criteria, organ scarcity, and limited centers. This highlights the need for enhanced public education and awareness through digital health platforms.

Methods

We utilized Google's AI-driven, consensus-based model and Claude AI 3.0 Opus by Anthropic to analyze public perceptions of pancreas transplantation. The top 10 websites identified by Google as of April-May 2024 were reviewed, focusing on sentiment, consensus, content readability, and complexity to develop strategies for better public engagement and understanding using digital health technologies.

Results

The top 10 websites, originating from the US and UK, showed a neutral and professional tone, targeting medical professionals and patients. Complex content was updated between 2021 and 2024, with a readability level suitable for high school to early college students. AI-driven analysis revealed strategies to increase public interest and understanding, including incorporating patient stories, simplifying medical jargon, utilizing visual aids, emphasizing quality of life improvements, showcasing research progress, facilitating patient outreach, promoting community engagement, partnering with influencers, and regularly updating content through digital health platforms.

Conclusion

To increase interest in pancreas transplantation in the era of connected health, we recommend integrating real patient experiences, simplifying medical content, using visual explanations, emphasizing post-transplant quality-of-life improvements, highlighting recent research, providing outreach opportunities, encouraging community connections, partnering with influencers, and keeping information current through digital health technologies. These methods aim to make pancreas transplantation more accessible and motivating for a diverse audience, supporting informed decision-making.

Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Outcomes Stratified by Autoantibodies Status and Pretransplant Fasting C-peptide

BACKGROUNDS

Pancreatic beta cell function and islet autoantibodies classically distinguish types of diabetes (type 1 diabetes mellitus [DM] or type 2 DM). Here, we sought to evaluate simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant outcomes stratified by the presence or absence of beta cell function and autoantibodies.

METHODS

SPK recipients were eligible if pretransplant autoantibodies were measured against insulin, islet cell, or glutamic acid decarboxylase 65-kD isoform. Recipients were categorized as A+ or A- based on the detection of ≥1 autoantibodies. Recipients were similarly categorized on the basis of detectable pretransplant fasting C-peptide of ≥2 ng/mL (β+) or <2 ng/mL (β-). Thus, recipients were categorized into 4 groups: A+β-, A-β-, A-β+, and A+β+. Outcomes of interest were overall pancreas graft failure (non-death-censored), death-censored pancreas, or kidney graft failure (death-censored pancreas graft failure [DCGF]; kidney DCGF), composite outcomes with any of the 3 outcomes as pancreas DCGF, use of an antidiabetic agent, or hemoglobin A1c >6.5.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three SPK recipients were included: A+β- (n = 72), A-β- (n = 42), A-β+ (n = 49), and A+β+ (n = 20). We did not detect a statistical difference in non-death-censored pancreas graft failure for A+β- recipients compared with other groups: A-β- (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-1.42), A-β+ (aHR: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.37-2.85), and A+β+ (aHR: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.13-3.33) in adjusted analyses. Similar outcomes were observed for other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In SPK recipients, outcomes were similar among recipients with classic features of type 1 DM and various other types of DM.

Four Decades of Research Productivity and Hot Spots in Pancreas Transplantation

Background: The field of pancreas transplantation has undergone transformative phases, progressing from its promising inception in 1966 to becoming a standard treatment for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. This bibliometric analysis explores the progression of pancreas transplantation research over a period of four decades, mapping milestones, contributors, and emerging trends. Methods: Our bibliometric analysis utilizes the comprehensive Scopus database, which includes publication titles, author information, affiliations, abstracts, keywords, and journal details. The search strategy was centered on research related to pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation. The analysis encompasses the time frame spanning from 1983 to 2023, with the data extraction taking place on October 7th, 2023. Results: The analysis of 4,897 articles uncovered unique trends in the field of pancreas transplantation research. The years 1989, 1996, and 2021 saw significant increases in the number of publications, which corresponded to the responses to clinical challenges and advancements. Contributions by authors from the United States of America were the most numerous, with 1,905 publications and 49,949 citations. The research topics were highlighted by keywords such as "graft survival," "graft rejection," and" Immunosuppressive treatment." Conclusion: The fluctuations in publication trends that have been identified indicate dynamic reactions to changing priorities and challenges. Although it has limitations, this analysis provides valuable insights for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers who are dealing with the complex field of pancreas transplantation literature. Further bibliometric research may advance our knowledge and direct future initiatives in this developing field.

Generating strategies for a national comeback in pancreas transplantation: A Delphi survey and US conference report

In the United States, potential transplant candidates with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus are inconsistently offered pancreas transplantation (PTx), contributing to a dramatic decline in pancreas allograft utilization over the past 2 decades. The American Society of Transplantation organized a workshop to identify barriers inhibiting PTx and to develop strategies for a national comeback. The 2-day workshop focused on 4 main topics: (1) referral/candidate selection, (2) organ recovery/utilization, (3) program performance/patient outcomes, and (4) enhanced education/research. Topics were explored through expert presentations, patient testimonials, breakout sessions, and strategic planning, including the identification of tasks for immediate focus. Additionally, a modified-Delphi survey was conducted among workshop members to develop and rate the importance of barriers, and the impact and feasibility of workgroup-identified improvement strategies. The panelists identified 16 barriers to progress and 44 strategies for consideration. The steps for a national comeback in PTx involve greater emphasis on efficient referral and candidate selection, better donor pancreas utilization practices, eliminating financial barriers to procurement and transplant, improving collaboration between transplant and diabetes societies and professionals, and increasing focus on PTx training, education, and research. Partnership between national societies, patient advocacy groups, and professionals will be essential to realizing this critical agenda.

Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies.

RESULTS

Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically.

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.

Poor utilization of deceased donor pancreata in the United States: Time for action

The number of solid organ pancreas transplants performed in the United States has declined over the past two decades despite improving outcomes and the known benefits associated with this procedure. Although the reasons are multifactorial, high rates of deceased donor pancreata nonrecovery and nonuse have at least in part contributed to the reduction in pancreas transplant activity. The pancreas has higher nonrecovery and nonuse rates compared to the kidney and liver because of more stringent donor selection criteria, particularly with respect to donor age and body mass index, although even marginally inferior donor pancreata likely still benefit some patients compared to alternative therapies. In this editorial, we present several donor-, candidate-, and center-specific factors that are either confirmed or suspected of being associated with inferior outcomes, which contribute to high pancreas nonrecovery and nonuse rates. In addition, we have discussed several measures to increase pancreas recovery and reduce pancreas nonutilization.

Pancreas Transplantation: Current Challenges, Considerations, and Controversies

Pancreas transplantation (PTx) reestablishes an autoregulating source of endogenous insulin responsive to normal feedback controls. In addition to achieving complete β-cell replacement that frees the patient with diabetes from the need to monitor serum glucose and administer exogenous insulin, successful PTx provides counterregulatory hormone secretion and exocrine function. A functioning PTx mitigates glycemic variability, eliminates the daily stigma and burden of diabetes, restores normal glucose homeostasis in patients with complicated diabetes, and improves quality of life and life expectancy. The tradeoff is that it entails a major surgical procedure and requisite long-term immunosuppression. Despite the high likelihood of rendering patients euglycemic independent of exogenous insulin, PTx is considered a treatment rather than a cure. In spite of steadily improving outcomes in each successive era coupled with expansion of recipient selection criteria to include patients with a type 2 diabetes phenotype, a decline in PTx activity has occurred in the new millennium related to a number of factors including: (1) lack of a primary referral source and general acceptance by the diabetes care community; (2) absence of consensus criteria; and (3) access, education, and resource issues within the transplant community. In the author's experience, patients who present as potential candidates for PTx have felt as though they needed to circumvent the conventional diabetes care model to gain access to transplant options. PTx should be featured more prominently in the management algorithms for patients with insulin requiring diabetes who are failing exogenous insulin therapy or experiencing progressive diabetic complications regardless of diabetes type. Furthermore, all patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease should undergo consideration for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation independent of geography or location.