Quick preparation of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

Insufficient pretransplant induction therapy is associated with diffuse intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) can now be successfully performed using standard pretransplant induction therapy. ABOi LT can achieve long-term outcomes comparable to those of blood type-compatible (ABOc) LT. The outcomes of patients with acute liver failure (ALF) undergoing urgent transplantation surgery with a limited induction period require further investigation.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2023, adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were included in this study. Patients were categorized into four groups for outcome analysis based on the chronicity of liver disease and transplant type. ALF patients who received ABOi LDLT, ALF patients who received ABOc LDLT, ESLD patients who received ABOi LDLT, and ESLD patients who received ABOc LDLT.

RESULTS

Diffuse intrahepatic cholangiopathy (DIC) was observed in four cases within the ABOi LDLT group (n = 3, 27.3% in group 1; n = 1, 2.6% in group 3; p = 0.03). In ABOi LDLT patients, rituximab was administered closer to LT in group 1 (5 [3-6] days before LDLT) than that in group 3 (15 [14-22] days before LDLT) ( p < 0.01). Univariate analysis identified ALF, a small graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), a low rituximab dose (<210 mg/m²), and postoperative rebound of isoagglutinin immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody titers as factors associated with an increased risk of DIC. Three out of four patients with DIC eventually experienced allograft loss. Overall, ABOi LDLT showed inferior long-term outcomes for ALF (5-year patient survival: 62.3%/73.6%/74.1%/76.7% in groups 1/2/3/4, respectively, p = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

ABOi LDLT achieved outcomes comparable to those of ABOc LDLT among ESLD patients but not among ALF patients. DIC is associated with a high risk of allograft loss. However, the combination of potent immunosuppressive agents, early detection of antibody rebound, and timely initiation of salvage treatment may improve long-term outcomes in these patients.

A novel scoring system to predict short-term mortality after living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

Liver transplantation is often the only lifesaving option for acute liver failure (ALF); however, the predictors of short-term mortality (death within one year) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for ALF have yet to be defined. We retrospectively collected patients ≥18 years old who underwent LDLT for ALF between 2010 and 2020 at 35 centers in Asia. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical variables related to short-term mortality and establish a novel scoring system. The Kaplan-Meier method was performed to explore the association between the score and overall survival. Of the 339 recipients, 46 (13.6%) died within 1 year after LDLT. Multivariate analyses revealed 4 independent risk factors for death: use of vasopressors or mechanical ventilation, the higher model for end-stage liver disease score, and a lower graft-to-recipient weight ratio. The internally validated c-statistic of the short-term mortality after transplant (SMT) score derived from these 4 variables was 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.87). The SMT score successfully stratified recipients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with 1-year overall survival rates of 96%, 80%, and 50%, respectively. In conclusion, our novel SMT score based on 4 predictors will guide ALF recipient and living donor selection.

Clinical significance and outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: a retrospective cohort study based on 15-year single-center experience

Purpose

This study aimed to describe adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure and evaluate its clinical significance by comparing its surgical and survival outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 267 consecutive patients (161 LDLT recipients and 106 DDLT recipients) aged 18 years or older who underwent liver transplantation between January 2006 and December 2020.

Results

The mean periods from hepatic encephalopathy to liver transplantation were 5.85 days and 8.35 days for LDLT and DDLT, respectively (P = 0.091). Among these patients, 121 (45.3%) had grade III or IV hepatic encephalopathy (living, 34.8% vs. deceased, 61.3%; P < 0.001), and 38 (14.2%) had brain edema (living, 16.1% vs. deceased, 11.3%; P = 0.269) before liver transplantation. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (living, 11.8% vs. deceased, 15.1%; P = 0.435), 10-year overall survival (living, 90.8% vs. deceased, 84.0%; P = 0.096), and graft survival (living, 83.5% vs. deceased, 71.3%; P = 0.051). However, postoperatively, the mean intensive care unit stay was shorter in the LDLT group (5.0 days vs. 9.5 days, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was associated with vasopressor use (odds ratio [OR], 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-7.96; P = 0.005) and brain edema (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.16-6.52; P = 0.022) of recipient at the time of transplantation. However, LDLT (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.59-2.66; P = 0.553) was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

LDLT is feasible for acute liver failure when organs from deceased donors are not available.

High Number of Plasma Exchanges Increases the Risk of Bacterial Infection in ABO-incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are major complications that cause significant mortality and morbidity in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The risk of bacterial infection has not been studied in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) recipients with a desensitization protocol in relation to the number of plasma exchanges (PEs). Therefore, we aimed to analyze the risk of bacterial infection in ABOi LDLT recipients with a high number of PEs compared with recipients with a low number of PEs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed with 681 adult LDLT recipients, of whom 171 ABOi LDLT recipients were categorized into the high (n = 52) or low (n = 119) PE groups based on a cutoff value of 6 PE sessions. We compared bacterial infections and postoperative bacteremia within 6 mo after liver transplantation with the ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT group (n = 510) as a control group.

RESULTS

The high PE group showed a bacterial infection rate of 49.9% and a postoperative bacteremia rate of 28.8%, which were significantly higher than those of the low PE group (31.1%, 17.8%) and the ABOc group (26.7%, 18.0%). In multivariate analysis, the high PE group was found to have a 2.4-fold higher risk of bacterial infection ( P  = 0.008). This group presented a lower 5-y survival rate of 58.6% compared with the other 2 groups (81.5% and 78.5%; P  = 0.030 and 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high number of preoperative PEs increases bacterial infection rate and postoperative bacteremia in ABOi LDLT.

Rituximab administration one week before ABO-incompatible liver transplantation due to drug-induced acute liver failure with hepatic coma: a case report

In cases of acute liver failure (ALF) with hepatic coma, early liver transplantation, including ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), should be considered. The ABO antibody barrier can be reduced using plasma exchange (PE) and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Plasma exchange is also performed for drug-induced ALF and is effective for desensitization. Rituximab treatment usually requires 14 days. There is presently no established desensitization protocol for ABOi-LDLT for ALF. Here, we report a case of drug-induced ALF with hepatic coma, which was treated with ABOi-LDLT using PE and rituximab 8 days prior to surgery. A 33-year-old female, with a history of headaches for which she was taking analgesics daily, developed drug-induced ALF with hepatic coma. Her ABOi sister desired to become a liver donor. We initiated desensitization using rituximab (500 mg) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 2000 mg/day), followed by five sessions of PE. Eight days after rituximab administration, ABOi-LDLT with splenectomy was performed. Postoperatively, the patient received local infusion via portal vein for 14 days and immunosuppression with tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, and MMF. No episode of cellular or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was observed. The patient was discharged uneventfully 56 days after ABOi-LDLT with no problems up to 15 months after the transplant.

Long-term outcomes following ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: a single-center experience of over 20 years

PURPOSE

Acute liver failure is a life-threatening condition for which ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) is sometimes the only life-saving treatment option. We reviewed a single-center experience of adult ABOi-LDLT treatment for acute liver failure (ALF).

METHODS

Preoperative treatment, immune indices (B cell marker, anti-donor blood-type antibody), and postoperative outcomes were compared between ALF and non-ALF groups.

RESULTS

There were 5 and 33 patients in the ALF and non-ALF groups, respectively. The ALF group received higher doses of steroids, underwent more rounds of plasma exchange (PE), and underwent transplantation for ALF with a shorter interval following preoperative rituximab (RTx) administration (median: 2 vs 13 days; P < 0.05) than the non-ALF group. Preoperatively, CD19-positive lymphocytes in the peripheral blood were sufficiently depleted in all of the non-ALF group patients, whereas they were poorly depleted in the ALF group. Postoperatively, neither group suffered anti-donor blood-type antibody titer rebound or antibody-mediated rejection. The ALF group had a comparable 5-year survival rate to the non-ALF group (80.0% vs 77.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the delayed preoperative administration of RTx, the ALF group showed an uneventful immunological response and acceptable long-term survival rate. Thus, ABOi-LDLT seems a viable treatment option for ALF.

Strategies for ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a definitive treatment for the decompensated liver cirrhosis and fulminant liver failure. With limited availability of cadaveric liver allograft, ABO incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays an important part in further expansion of donor pool. Over the years, with the introduction of Rituximab and improving desensitisation protocol, outcomes of ABOi LDLT are on par with ABO compatible LT. However, ABOi LDLT protocol varies markedly from centre to centre. Intravenous Rituximab followed by plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption effectively reduce ABO isoagglutinins titre before transplant, thereby reducing the risk of antibody mediated rejection in the post-transplant period. Local infusion therapy and splenectomy are not used routinely at most of the centres in Rituximab era. Post-transplant immunosuppression usually consists of standard triple drug regime, and tacrolimus trough levels are targeted at higher level compared to ABO compatible LT. Introduction of newer therapies like Belatacept and Obinutuzumab hold promise to further improve outcomes and reduce the risk of antibody mediated rejection related complications. ABOi LT in emergency situations like acute liver failure and deceased donor LT is challenging due to limited time period for desensitisation protocol before transplant, and available evidence are still limited but encouraging.

The critical role of therapeutic plasma exchange in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The shortage of donor liver restricts liver transplantation (LT). Nowadays, donor liver with ABO blood group incompatibility between donor and recipient has become an option to expand the source of donor liver. Although it is now possible to perform ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) LT, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been recognized as the primary cause of desperate outcomes after ABO-I LT. Anti-A/B antibody is the trigger of immune response to ABO-I LT graft injury. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can quickly reduce the titer of plasma antibodies and effectively inhibit humoral immunity.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed and CNKI databases using search terms "therapeutic plasma exchange", "ABO-incompatible liver transplantation", "ABO-I LT", "liver transplantation", "LT", "antibody-mediated rejection", and "AMR". Additional publications were identified by a manual search of references from key articles. The relevant publications published before September 30, 2020 were included in this review.

RESULTS

Different centers have made different attempts on whether to use TPE, when to use TPE and how often to use TPE. However, the control standard of lectin revision level is always controversial, the target titer varies significantly from center to center, and the standard target titer has not yet been established. TPE has several schemes to reduce antibody titers, but there is a lack of clinical trials that provide standardized procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE is essential for ABO-I LT. Hence, further research and clinical trials should be conducted to determine the best regimen for TPE to remove ABO antibodies and prevent AMR.

Determinants of Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Liver Transplant Recipients: The Role of Immunosuppression Reduction

Liver transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression show an attenuated antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Adjusting immunosuppressants during vaccination remains debated. We enrolled 380 liver transplant recipients receiving 2 doses of a protein subunit, mRNA, or a vector vaccine. The patients were informed to temporarily suspend immunosuppression for 2 weeks for both vaccination doses. We measured anti-live-SARS-CoV-2 spike neutralizing antibody levels at 1−2 months after the second vaccination; 83.9% of patients had humoral responses (SARS-CoV-2 NT50 ≥ 9.62 IU/mL) to 2 doses of vaccines. The mRNA (86.7%) and protein subunit vaccines (85%) yielded higher response rates than the vector vaccines (40.9%). Immunosuppression suspension during the two vaccinations yielded a higher response rate (91.5% vs. 57.7%). Only eight patients (2.1%) experienced transaminase level elevation of thrice the normal value (>110 IU/L) after the second vaccination. Most recovered spontaneously after resuming immunosuppression. Multivariate analysis revealed ABO incompatibility, white blood cell count <4000, lymphocyte count <20%, tacrolimus trough level >6.5 ng/mL, and no immunosuppression adjustment as independent risk factors to nonresponse. The mRNA and protein subunit vaccines yielded a higher response rate. Immunosuppression suspension for 2 weeks enhanced the antibody response. ABO incompatibility, leukopenia, lymphopenia, a high tacrolimus trough level, and no immunosuppression adjustment are associated with nonresponse.