Critical interactions between race and the highly granular area deprivation index in liver transplant evaluation

Disparities in liver transplantation for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is increasingly common, as is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the background of MASH. Liver transplantation (LT) provides superior long-term survival for patients with unresectable MASH-HCC, but not all patients have equal access to transplant. MASH-HCC disproportionately affects Hispanic patients, but minorities are less likely to undergo LT for HCC. Additionally, females also undergo LT at lower rates than males.

AIM

To investigate whether race/ethnicity and sex affect LT waitlist outcomes.

METHODS

Records of adults with MASH-HCC in the United States Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database listed for LT between 1/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Most of the 3810 patients waitlisted for LT for MASH-HCC were non-Hispanic (NH) white (71.2%) or Hispanic (23.4%), with only 49 (1.1%) NH Black candidates. Hispanics underwent LT at lower rates than NH whites (71.6% vs 78.4%, P < 0.001), but race/ethnicity did not affect waitlist mortality (P = 0.06). Patients with Hispanic [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.77-0.95, P = 0.002] or Asian (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98, P = 0.04) race/ethnicity were less likely to undergo LT. Women were also less likely to receive LT (male: HR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.29, P = 0.01). Patients in regions 1 and 9 were less likely to be transplanted as well (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Hispanic patients are less likely to undergo LT for MASH-HCC, concerning given their susceptibility to MASH and HCC. There were very few NH Black candidates. Disparities were also unequal across regions, which is particularly concerning in states where at-risk populations have rising cancer incidence. Additional research is needed to identify strategies for mitigating these differences in access to LT for MASH-HCC.

Marked variation in disease acuity and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list by sociodemographic characteristics

Understanding the association of social determinants of health with liver transplant listing and waitlist outcomes can inform health care policy and interventions aimed at improving access to care. We analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database merged with the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) to evaluate if the area of residence is associated with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease incorporating sodium (MELD-Na) at the time of waitlist placement and outcomes following waitlisting, and if this varied based on sociodemographic variables. Compared to candidates residing in areas of low SDI, those residing in areas of high SDI (most socioeconomic disadvantage) had 11% higher adjusted likelihood (aOR [95% CI] = 1.11 [CI 1.05,1.17]) of being listed for transplant with a MELD-Na score ≥30; this was not statistically significant when also adjusted for race/ethnicity (aOR = 1.02 [0.97,1.08]). When stratified by race/ethnicity, residing in an area of high SDI was associated with a MELD-Na score ≥30 at the time of waitlisting among Hispanic White candidates (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.49). Candidates residing in areas of high SDI had an 8% lower chance (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.92 [0.88,0.96]) of undergoing a liver transplant, a 6% higher risk of death (aHR = 1.06 [1.002,1.13]), and a 20% higher risk (aHR = 1.20 [1.13,1.28]) of removal on the waitlist independent of race, ethnicity, insurance status, or sex. In the United States, residence in areas of high socioeconomic disadvantage is significantly associated with higher MELD-Na at the time of waitlisting among Hispanic White candidates. In addition, residence in areas of high socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with a higher risk of death or removal from the waitlist and lower chances of receiving a liver transplant after waitlist placement, particularly among Non-Hispanic White candidates and older candidates.

Exploring Caregiver Support as a Potential Mediator of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Reduced Likelihood of Liver Transplant Waitlisting

Background

Individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods may be at risk of inequitable access to the liver transplant (LT) waitlisting (WL), but mechanisms mediating this relationship are not well understood. We assessed whether area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, was associated with LT WL and assessed whether caregiver support, a potentially modifiable factor, mediated this relationship.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults referred for LT evaluation from January 2015 to December 2021. First, we assessed the association between ADI and LT WL using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Second, we analyzed caregiver support as a potential mediator through mediation analysis.

Results

During the study period, 2574 patients were referred for LT, 2057 patients initiated evaluation, and 622 patients were waitlisted. Residence in the highest ADI quartile was associated with lower probability of WL (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.99) after adjusting for individual medical and sociodemographic factors, and distance from the transplant center. In adjusted mediation analysis, caregiver support did not mediate the relationship between ADI and LT WL (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.01), and highest ADI quartile also did not have significant direct effects on LT WL (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72-1.26).

Conclusions

ADI may be useful as a screening tool to identify candidates who could benefit from early intervention in the LT process when individual social needs information is not available. Caregiver support did not mediate the ADI and LT WL association. Additional work is needed to understand which modifiable factors may mediate this association to inform potential interventions for this population.

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse patient and graft survival following adult liver transplantation

The impact of social determinants of health on adult liver transplant recipient outcomes is not clear at a national level. Further understanding of the impact of social determinants of health on patient outcomes can inform effective, equitable health care delivery. Unadjusted and multivariable models were used to analyze the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to evaluate the association between the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) based on the liver transplant recipient's residential location and patient and graft survival. We included adult recipients between January 1, 2008 and December 1, 2021. Patient and graft survival were lower in adults living in areas with deprivation scores above the median. Five-year patient and graft survival were 78.7% and 76.5%, respectively, in the cohort above median SDI compared to 80.5% and 78.3% below median SDI. Compared to the recipients in low-deprivation residential areas, recipients residing in the highest deprivation (SDI quintile = 5) cohort had 6% higher adjusted risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13) and 6% higher risk of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.001-1.11). The increased risks for recipients residing in more vulnerable residential areas were higher (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20 for both death and graft loss) following the first year after transplantation. Importantly, the overall risk for graft loss associated with SDI was not linear but instead accelerated above the median level of deprivation. In the United States, social determinants of health, as reflected by residential distress, significantly impacts 5-year patient and graft survival. The overall effect of residential deprivation is modest, and importantly, results illustrate they are more strongly associated with longer-term follow-up and accelerate at higher deprivation levels. Further research is needed to evaluate effective interventions and policies to attenuate disparities in outcomes among recipients in highly disadvantaged areas.

Social Disadvantage and Disparities in Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact chronic liver disease (CLD) outcomes but are not clearly understood. We conducted a systematic review to describe the associations of SDOH with mortality, hospitalizations, and readmissions among patients with CLD.

METHODS

This review was registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022346654) and identified articles through MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. The review included studies that reported SDOH characteristics within the domains of economic stability, healthcare access, education, social and community context, and the neighborhood-built environment. Associated outcomes of interest were mortality, hospitalizations, or readmissions. The Cochrane Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies for Exposure was used to assess study quality and risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 5,205 abstracts were screened, 60 articles underwent full-text review, and 27 articles were included in the final review. Poor economic stability, healthcare access, social support, and household/environmental conditions were associated with higher mortality and hospital readmissions among patients with CLD. Increasing distance (≥25 miles away) from a liver transplantation center was associated with higher mortality, despite increasing access to the liver transplantation waitlist. When assessing the overall risk of bias among included studies, most had "some concern" (N = 13, 48.1%) or "high risk" (N = 11, 40.7%), whereas a minority had "very high risk" (N = 3, 11.1%). No studies were categorized as "low risk."

DISCUSSION

Unfavorable SDOH were associated with increased mortality and hospital readmissions among patients with CLD. Rigorous empirical research is needed to identify evidence-based strategies that aim to mitigate disparities among vulnerable populations.

Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Liver transplant (LT) evaluation is a complex process for patients involving multi-step and parallel medical, surgical, and psychosocial assessments of a patient's appropriateness for transplant. Patients may experience difficulties in navigating the evaluation process, potentially leading to disengagement and resulting in further health decline or death prior to completing evaluation. We aimed to identify and characterize patients' perceptions of undergoing LT evaluation.

METHODS

We performed fourteen 30-45 min, semi-structured interviews between 3/2021-5/2021 with patients at a large LT center. Using the constant comparison method, we individually noted themes within and across interviews and codes.

RESULTS

Our analysis generated 5 thematic dimensions related to patient engagement (i.e., patient involvement/activation): (1) psychological impact of evaluation on patients' lives; (2) information received during evaluation; (3) prior medical experience of the patient; 4) communication between patients and transplant providers; and (5) support system of the patients. Among these dimensions, we identified 8 themes.

CONCLUSION

LT patient engagement is a multi-dimensional component of LT evaluation that incorporates the psychological impact, information received, prior medical experience, communication, and support systems of patients.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

This work can inform targeted interventions for increasing patient engagement during the LT evaluation process.

Demographic differences between patients selecting video or telephone for contraceptive counseling via telehealth

OBJECTIVE

To explore differences in demographic characteristics and telehealth usability between patients who chose video versus telephone for telehealth contraceptive counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort comparing the interpersonal quality of contraceptive counseling between in-person and telehealth visits at a single Title X-funded clinic. Before the clinical visit, a non-clinician counselor provided structured contraceptive counseling based on patients' preferred modality. After counseling, respondents completed an electronic survey which included the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). Post-visit, the counselor evaluated perceived patient engagement. We calculated Area Deprivation Index (ADI) percentiles to characterize neighborhood environment. We compared characteristics between patients choosing video and telephone using Poisson regression and performed analyses stratified by ADI to test for effect modification.

RESULTS

Between March 2021 and June 2022, we enrolled 149 patients in the telehealth group: 146 (98%) were included in the analysis. Seventy percent of respondents chose telephone. Higher ADI, Black race, and lower educational level (<4 years college) were associated with choosing telephone in the unadjusted analysis. However, after stratifying by ADI, only lower educational level remained associated with choice of telephone among respondents from more deprived neighborhoods (aRR 1.46, 95% CI 1.01-2.11). We observed no differences in TUQ scores between respondents choosing telephone and video.

CONCLUSION

When given the option, more patients selected telephone than video for telehealth contraceptive counseling. No demographic characteristics were associated with choice of telephone among patients with a higher ADI. Offering telephone-based telehealth may improve access for people seeking contraceptive services.

IMPLICATIONS

We found that telephone-based telehealth is preferable for some patients, which may reflect differences in access to or comfort with video technology. We observed that higher ADI, Black race, and lower education level were associated with choice of telephone, although not after stratifying by ADI. Utilization of telephone-based telehealth may improve access for some patients and lead to more equitable-based health care.

Disparities in Liver Transplant Outcomes: Race/Ethnicity and Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status

Race/ethnicity and individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute to health disparities in liver transplant (LT) outcomes. The socioeconomic conditions of a neighborhood may either mitigate or exacerbate these health disparities. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between race/ethnicity, individual- and neighborhood-level SES, and LT outcomes, and whether neighborhood-level SES modified the relationship between individual factors and LT outcomes. Adult individuals who underwent LT between 2010 and 2019 (n = 55,688) were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Primary exposures were race/ethnicity, education, primary insurance type, and the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) scores. Education and primary insurance type were used as proxies for individual-level SES, while SDI scores were used as a proxy for neighborhood-level SES. The primary outcome was time to occurrence of graft failure or mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations between the exposures and outcomes. LT recipients who were Black (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27, p < .0001), completed high school or less (HR: 1.06, p = .002), and had public insurance (HR: 1.14, p < .0001) had a higher rate of graft failure or mortality than those who were White, completed more than high school, and had private insurance, respectively. The SDI scores were not significantly associated with LT outcomes when adjusting for individual factors (HR: 1.02, p = .45) and did not modify the associations between individual factors and LT outcomes. Findings of this study suggest that disparities based on individual factors were not modified by neighborhood-level SES. Tailored interventions targeting the unique needs associated with race/ethnicity and individual-level SES are needed to optimize LT outcomes.

A retrospective cohort study of socioeconomic deprivation and post-liver transplant survival in adults

The Area Deprivation Index is a granular measure of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. The relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and recipient survival following liver transplantation (LT) is unclear. To investigate this, the authors performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent LT at the University of Washington Medical Center from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2020. The primary exposure was a degree of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation as determined by the Area Deprivation Index score. The primary outcome was posttransplant recipient mortality. In a multivariable Cox proportional analysis, LT recipients from high-deprivation areas had a higher risk of mortality than those from low-deprivation areas (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.03-3.18, p =0.04). Notably, the difference in mortality between area deprivation groups did not become statistically significant until 6 years after transplantation. In summary, LT recipients experiencing high socioeconomic deprivation tended to have worse posttransplant survival. Further research is needed to elucidate the extent to which neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation contributes to mortality risk and identify effective measures to improve survival in more socioeconomically disadvantaged LT recipients.

Association of Neighborhood Deprivation and Transplant Center Quality with Liver Transplantation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health can impact the quality of liver transplantation (LT) care. We sought to assess whether the association between neighborhood deprivation and transplant outcomes can be mitigated by receiving care at high-quality transplant centers.

STUDY DESIGN

In this population-based cohort study, patients who underwent LT between 2004 and 2019 were identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. LT-recipient neighborhoods were identified at the county level and stratified into quintiles relative to Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Transplant center quality was based on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier ranking using standardized transplant rate ratios. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between ADI, hospital quality, and posttransplant survival.

RESULTS

A total of 41,333 recipients (median age, 57.0 [50.0 to 63.0] years; 27,112 [65.4%] male) met inclusion criteria. Patients residing in the most deprived areas were more likely to have nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, be Black, and travel further distances to reach a transplant center. On multivariable analysis, post-LT long-term mortality was associated with low- vs high-quality transplant centers (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.32), as well as among patients residing in high- vs low-ADI neighborhoods (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.34; both p ≤ 0.001). Of note, individuals residing in high- vs low-ADI neighborhoods had a higher risk of long-term mortality after treatment at a low-quality (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.62, p = 0.011) vs high-quality (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.52, p = 0.471) LT center.

CONCLUSIONS

LT at high-quality centers may be able to mitigate the association between posttransplant survival and neighborhood deprivation. Investments and initiatives that increase access to referrals to high-quality centers for patients residing in higher deprivation may lead to better outcomes and help mitigate disparities in LT.

The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on liver transplantation

Despite global expansion, social disparities impact all phases of liver transplantation, from patient referral to post-transplant care. In pediatric populations, socioeconomic deprivation is associated with delayed referral, higher waitlist mortality, and reduced access to living donor transplantation. Children from socially deprived communities are twice as much less adherent to immunosuppression and have up to a 32% increased incidence of graft failure. Similarly, adult patients from deprived areas and racial minorities have a higher risk of not initiating the transplant evaluation, lower rates of waitlisting, and a 6% higher risk of not being transplanted. Social deprivation is racially segregated, and Black recipients have an increased risk of post-transplant mortality by up to 21%. The mechanisms linking social deprivation to inferior outcomes are not entirely elucidated, and powered studies are still lacking. We offer a review of the most recent evidence linking social deprivation and post-liver transplant outcomes in pediatric and adult populations, as well as a literature-derived theoretical background model for future research on this topic.