1
|
Bihler H, Sivachenko A, Millen L, Bhatt P, Patel AT, Chin J, Bailey V, Musisi I, LaPan A, Allaire NE, Conte J, Simon NR, Magaret AS, Raraigh KS, Cutting GR, Skach WR, Bridges RJ, Thomas PJ, Mense M. In vitro modulator responsiveness of 655 CFTR variants found in people with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2024:S1569-1993(24)00021-3. [PMID: 38388235 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration initiated expansion of drug labels for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) to include CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene variants based on in vitro functional studies. This study aims to identify CFTR variants that result in increased chloride (Cl-) transport function by the CFTR protein after treatment with the CFTR modulator combination elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA). These data may benefit people with CF (pwCF) who are not currently eligible for modulator therapies. METHODS Plasmid DNA encoding 655 CFTR variants and wild-type (WT) CFTR were transfected into Fisher Rat Thyroid cells that do not natively express CFTR. After 24 h of incubation with control or TEZ and ELX, and acute addition of IVA, CFTR function was assessed using the transepithelial current clamp conductance assay. Each variant's forskolin/cAMP-induced baseline Cl- transport activity, responsiveness to IVA alone, and responsiveness to the TEZ/ELX/IVA combination were measured in three different laboratories. Western blots were conducted to evaluate CFTR protein maturation and complement the functional data. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 253 variants not currently approved for CFTR modulator therapy showed low baseline activity (<10 % of normal CFTR Cl- transport activity). For 152 of these variants, treatment with ELX/TEZ/IVA improved the Cl- transport activity by ≥10 % of normal CFTR function, which is suggestive of clinical benefit. ELX/TEZ/IVA increased CFTR function by ≥10 percentage points for an additional 140 unapproved variants with ≥10 % but <50 % of normal CFTR function at baseline. These findings significantly expand the number of rare CFTR variants for which ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment should result in clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Bihler
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | | | - Linda Millen
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Priyanka Bhatt
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | | | - Justin Chin
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | - Violaine Bailey
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | - Isaac Musisi
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | - André LaPan
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | | | - Joshua Conte
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | - Noah R Simon
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-9300, USA
| | | | - Karen S Raraigh
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205-2196, USA
| | - Garry R Cutting
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205-2196, USA
| | | | - Robert J Bridges
- Rosalind Franklin University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60064, USA
| | - Philip J Thomas
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Martin Mense
- CFFT Lab, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Lexington, MA 02421, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bacalhau M, Camargo M, Lopes-Pacheco M. Laboratory Tools to Predict CFTR Modulator Therapy Effectiveness and to Monitor Disease Severity in Cystic Fibrosis. J Pers Med 2024; 14:93. [PMID: 38248793 PMCID: PMC10820563 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The implementation of cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs into clinical practice has been attaining remarkable therapeutic outcomes for CF, a life-threatening autosomal recessive genetic disease. However, there is elevated CFTR allelic heterogeneity, and various individuals carrying (ultra)rare CF genotypes remain without any approved modulator therapy. Novel translational model systems based on individuals' own cells/tissue are now available and can be used to interrogate in vitro CFTR modulator responses and establish correlations of these assessments with clinical features, aiming to provide prediction of therapeutic effectiveness. Furthermore, because CF is a progressive disease, assessment of biomarkers in routine care is fundamental in monitoring treatment effectiveness and disease severity. In the first part of this review, we aimed to focus on the utility of individual-derived in vitro models (such as bronchial/nasal epithelial cells and airway/intestinal organoids) to identify potential responders and expand personalized CF care. Thereafter, we discussed the usage of CF inflammatory biomarkers derived from blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and sputum to routinely monitor treatment effectiveness and disease progression. Finally, we summarized the progress in investigating extracellular vesicles as a robust and reliable source of biomarkers and the identification of microRNAs related to CFTR regulation and CF inflammation as novel biomarkers, which may provide valuable information for disease prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mafalda Bacalhau
- Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal;
| | - Mariana Camargo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Sao Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo 04039-060, SP, Brazil
| | - Miquéias Lopes-Pacheco
- Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramalho AS, Amato F, Gentzsch M. Patient-derived cell models for personalized medicine approaches in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2023; 22 Suppl 1:S32-S38. [PMID: 36529661 PMCID: PMC9992303 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel that perturb anion transport across the epithelia of the airways and other organs. To treat cystic fibrosis, strategies that target mutant CFTR have been developed such as correctors that rescue folding and enhance transfer of CFTR to the apical membrane, and potentiators that increase CFTR channel activity. While there has been tremendous progress in development and approval of CFTR therapeutics for the most common (F508del) and several other CFTR mutations, around 10-20% of people with cystic fibrosis have rare mutations that are still without an effective treatment. In the current decade, there was an impressive evolution of patient-derived cell models for precision medicine. In cystic fibrosis, these models have played a crucial role in characterizing the molecular defects in CFTR mutants and identifying compounds that target these defects. Cells from nasal, bronchial, and rectal epithelia are most suitable to evaluate treatments that target CFTR. In vitro assays using cultures grown at an air-liquid interface or as organoids and spheroids allow the diagnosis of the CFTR defect and assessment of potential treatment strategies. An overview of currently established cell culture models and assays for personalized medicine approaches in cystic fibrosis will be provided in this review. These models allow theratyping of rare CFTR mutations with available modulator compounds to predict clinical efficacy. Besides evaluation of individual personalized responses to CFTR therapeutics, patient-derived culture models are valuable for testing responses to developmental treatments such as novel RNA- and DNA-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela S Ramalho
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Felice Amato
- Department Of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies and CE.IN.GE - Biotecnologie Avanzate, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Martina Gentzsch
- Marsico Lung Institute - Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bergougnoux A, Billet A, Ka C, Heller M, Degrugillier F, Vuillaume ML, Thoreau V, Sasorith S, Bareil C, Thèze C, Ferec C, Gac GL, Bienvenu T, Bieth E, Gaston V, Lalau G, Pagin A, Malinge MC, Dufernez F, Lemonnier L, Koenig M, Fergelot P, Claustres M, Taulan-Cadars M, Kitzis A, Reboul MP, Becq F, Fanen P, Mekki C, Audrezet MP, Girodon E, Raynal C. The multi-faceted nature of 15 CFTR exonic variations: Impact on their functional classification and perspectives for therapy. J Cyst Fibros 2022:S1569-1993(22)01423-0. [PMID: 36567205 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of variants of unknown clinical significance (VUCS) in the CFTR gene are missense variants. While change on the CFTR protein structure or function is often suspected, impact on splicing may be neglected. Such undetected splicing default of variants may complicate the interpretation of genetic analyses and the use of an appropriate pharmacotherapy. METHODS We selected 15 variants suspected to impact CFTR splicing after in silico predictions on 319 missense variants (214 VUCS), reported in the CFTR-France database. Six specialized laboratories assessed the impact of nucleotide substitutions on splicing (minigenes), mRNA expression levels (quantitative PCR), synthesis and maturation (western blot), cellular localization (immunofluorescence) and channel function (patch clamp) of the CFTR protein. We also studied maturation and function of the truncated protein, consecutive to in-frame aberrant splicing, on additional plasmid constructs. RESULTS Six of the 15 variants had a major impact on CFTR splicing by in-frame (n = 3) or out-of-frame (n = 3) exon skipping. We reclassified variants into: splicing variants; variants causing a splicing defect and the impairment of CFTR folding and/or function related to the amino acid substitution; deleterious missense variants that impair CFTR folding and/or function; and variants with no consequence on the different processes tested. CONCLUSION The 15 variants have been reclassified by our comprehensive approach of in vitro experiments that should be used to properly interpret very rare exonic variants of the CFTR gene. Targeted therapies may thus be adapted to the molecular defects regarding the results of laboratory experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bergougnoux
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS UMR, Montpellier, France; Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Billet
- Laboratoire STIM, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - C Ka
- Service de génétique moléculaire, CHRU Brest, Brest, France; Université de Brest, Inserm, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France
| | - M Heller
- Service de Médecine Génomique des Maladies de Système et d'Organe, APHP Centre - Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - F Degrugillier
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil F-94010, France
| | - M-L Vuillaume
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - V Thoreau
- Laboratoire NEUVACOD-3808, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - S Sasorith
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS UMR, Montpellier, France
| | - C Bareil
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - C Thèze
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - C Ferec
- Université de Brest, Inserm, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France
| | - G Le Gac
- Service de génétique moléculaire, CHRU Brest, Brest, France; Université de Brest, Inserm, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France
| | - T Bienvenu
- Service de Médecine Génomique des Maladies de Système et d'Organe, APHP Centre - Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - E Bieth
- Génétique Médicale, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - V Gaston
- Génétique Médicale, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - G Lalau
- Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - A Pagin
- Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - M-C Malinge
- Biochimie et Génétique, CHU Angers, Angers, France
| | - F Dufernez
- Génétique, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - L Lemonnier
- Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose, Paris, France
| | - M Koenig
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS UMR, Montpellier, France; Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - P Fergelot
- MRGM, INSERM UMR 1211 Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Claustres
- Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - M Taulan-Cadars
- PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS UMR, Montpellier, France; Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Kitzis
- Génétique, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - M-P Reboul
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Becq
- Laboratoire STIM, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - P Fanen
- AP-HP, Département de Biochimie-Biologie Moléculaire, Pharmacologie, Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil F-94010, France
| | - C Mekki
- AP-HP, Département de Biochimie-Biologie Moléculaire, Pharmacologie, Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil F-94010, France
| | - M-P Audrezet
- Service de génétique moléculaire, CHRU Brest, Brest, France; Université de Brest, Inserm, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France
| | - E Girodon
- Service de Médecine Génomique des Maladies de Système et d'Organe, APHP Centre - Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; INSERM U1151, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - C Raynal
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS UMR, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ensinck MM, Carlon MS. One Size Does Not Fit All: The Past, Present and Future of Cystic Fibrosis Causal Therapies. Cells 2022; 11:cells11121868. [PMID: 35740997 PMCID: PMC9220995 DOI: 10.3390/cells11121868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common monogenic disorder, caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Over the last 30 years, tremendous progress has been made in understanding the molecular basis of CF and the development of treatments that target the underlying defects in CF. Currently, a highly effective CFTR modulator treatment (Kalydeco™/Trikafta™) is available for 90% of people with CF. In this review, we will give an extensive overview of past and ongoing efforts in the development of therapies targeting the molecular defects in CF. We will discuss strategies targeting the CFTR protein (i.e., CFTR modulators such as correctors and potentiators), its cellular environment (i.e., proteostasis modulation, stabilization at the plasma membrane), the CFTR mRNA (i.e., amplifiers, nonsense mediated mRNA decay suppressors, translational readthrough inducing drugs) or the CFTR gene (gene therapies). Finally, we will focus on how these efforts can be applied to the 15% of people with CF for whom no causal therapy is available yet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein M. Ensinck
- Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Flanders, Belgium;
| | - Marianne S. Carlon
- Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Flanders, Belgium;
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ensinck M, Mottais A, Detry C, Leal T, Carlon MS. On the Corner of Models and Cure: Gene Editing in Cystic Fibrosis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:662110. [PMID: 33986686 PMCID: PMC8111007 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.662110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a severe genetic disease for which curative treatment is still lacking. Next generation biotechnologies and more efficient cell-based and in vivo disease models are accelerating the development of novel therapies for CF. Gene editing tools, like CRISPR-based systems, can be used to make targeted modifications in the genome, allowing to correct mutations directly in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. Alternatively, with these tools more relevant disease models can be generated, which in turn will be invaluable to evaluate novel gene editing-based therapies for CF. This critical review offers a comprehensive description of currently available tools for genome editing, and the cell and animal models which are available to evaluate them. Next, we will give an extensive overview of proof-of-concept applications of gene editing in the field of CF. Finally, we will touch upon the challenges that need to be addressed before these proof-of-concept studies can be translated towards a therapy for people with CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein Ensinck
- Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Angélique Mottais
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Claire Detry
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Teresinha Leal
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianne S. Carlon
- Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|