A case of cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma with extensive adipocytic metaplasia: Usefulness of EWSR1-PBX3 gene fusion analysis

Cutaneous Syncytial Myoepithelioma: An Uncommon and Distinct Variant of Cutaneous Epithelioid Neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma (CSM) is an uncommon and distinct variant of cutaneous myoepithelioma. We aim to present a case of CSM to enhance the recognition of this unique variant, encompassing its clinical characteristics, histopathological features, immunohistochemical staining, and therapeutic approaches.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 10-year-old girl presented with a dome-shaped nodule located on the skin of her left medial distal arm. Microscopic examination of the skin biopsy revealed a well-defined dermal nodular lesion, surrounded by an epidermal collarette. Tumor cells were composed of epithelioid to spindle-shaped cells with round-to-oval nuclei, small nucleoli, and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with a syncytial-like growth pattern. A moderate degree of nuclear pleomorphism was noted. Mitotic activity was not prominent. Immunohistochemical staining revealed positive staining for epithelial membrane antigen, GLUT1, collagen IV, and S100. Smooth muscle actin, CD10, and CD68 showed patchy positivity. CD31, CD34, p63, SOX10, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), glial fibrillary acidic protein, pankeratin (AE1/AE3/PCK26), Melan-A, and CD1a were negative. Fluorescence in situ hybridization targeting TFE3 and ALK genes was negative. The differential diagnosis included ALK-negative epithelioid cell histiocytoma, epithelioid perineurioma, and CSM. Based on the above findings, a diagnosis of CSM was rendered.

DISCUSSION

CSM is a benign cutaneous neoplasm composed of sheets of histiocytoid or short spindle cells with pale eosinophilic cytoplasm with a syncytial-like growth pattern. Clinically, CSM often presents as a painless, slow-growing nodule or plaque in a broad anatomical distribution with a preference for the distal extremities. CSM is characteristically positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and S100 protein and negative for keratins. In challenging cases, molecular testing for EWSR1 gene rearrangement and EWSR1-PBX3 gene fusion aid in confirming the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The histologic features of CSM present a unique set of challenges posing a diagnostic dilemma, as they can bear resemblance to a range of benign and malignant cutaneous neoplasms including ALK-negative epithelioid cell histiocytoma, epithelioid perineurioma, malignant or nevoid melanoma, and epithelioid sarcoma. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for guiding proper clinical management considering that this entity typically demonstrates an excellent prognosis following a complete surgical excision.

Non-cutaneous syncytial myoepitheliomas are identical to cutaneous counterparts: a clinicopathologic study of 24 tumors occurring at diverse locations

AIMS

Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma (CSM) is a rare myoepithelioma variant of skin, characterized by intradermal syncytial growth of spindle cells with a distinct immunophenotype of EMA and S100 positivity and infrequent keratin expression. While CSM was first described as a cutaneous tumor, singular non-cutaneous cases have since been reported in bone. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of this variant across all anatomic sites through a large multi-institutional study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We complied a total of 24 myoepitheliomas with syncytial growth from our files. The tumors occurred in 12 male and 12 female patients (M:F = 1:1), with a median age of 31 years (range, 9-69 years). While the majority of tumors (75%, n = 18) occurred in skin, a significant subset (25%, n = 6) arose in non-cutaneous sites, including bone (n = 3), bronchus/trachea (n = 2), and interosseous membrane of tibia/fibula (n = 1). Tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 5.9 cm. Clinical follow-up (7 patients; range 14-202 months; median 56.5 months) showed a single local recurrence 8 years after incomplete skin excision but no metastases; all patients were alive at the time of last follow-up without evidence of disease. Histologically, all tumors were pink at low-power and characterized by a syncytial growth of bland ovoid, spindled, or histiocytoid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent perivascular lymphoplasmacytic inflammation. One-third displayed adipocytic metaplasia (8/24). Rare cytologic atypia was seen but was not associated with increased mitotic activity. All tumors expressed S100, SMA, and/or EMA. Keratin expression was absent in most cases. Molecular analysis was performed in 16 cases, all showing EWSR1-rearrangments. In total, 15/15 (100%) harbored an EWSR1::PBX3 fusion, whereas 1 case EWSR1 FISH was the only molecular study performed.

CONCLUSION

Syncytial myoepithelioma is a rare but recognizable morphologic variant of myoepithelioma which may have a predilection for skin but also occurs in diverse non-cutaneous sites. Our series provides evidence supporting a reappraisal of the term "cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma," as 25% of patients in our series presented with non-cutaneous tumors; thus, we propose the term "syncytial myoepithelioma" to aid pathologist recognition and avoidance of potentially confusing terminology when referring to non-cutaneous examples. The behavior of syncytial myoepithelioma, whether it arises in cutaneous or non-cutaneous sites, is indolent and perhaps benign with a small capacity for local recurrence.