Risk of malignancy according to sub-classification of the atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology

A Comprehensive Approach to the Thyroid Bethesda Category III (AUS) in the Transition Zone Between 2nd Edition and 3rd Edition of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Subcategorization, Nuclear Scoring, and More

Significant interobserver variabilities exist for Bethesda category III: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Thus, subcategorization of AUS including AUS "nuclear" and AUS "other" is proposed in the recent 3rd edition of TBSRTC. This study investigated the impact of the nuclear features/architectural features/nuclear score (NS) (3-tiered)/subcategories and subgroups on risk of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNA). 6940 FNAs were evaluated. 1224 (17.6%) cases diagnosed as AUS were reviewed, and 240 patients (initial FNAs of 260 nodules and 240 thyroidectomies) were included. Subcategories and subgroups were defined according to TBSRTC 2nd and 3rd editions. Histological diagnostic groups included nonneoplastic disease, benign neoplasm, low-risk neoplasm, and malignant neoplasm. Overall, ROM was 30.7%. ROM was significantly higher in FNAs with nuclear overlapping (35.5%), nuclear molding (56.9%), irregular contours (42.1%), nuclear grooves (74.1%), chromatin clearing (49.4%), and chromatin margination (57.7%), and these features were independent significant predictors for malignancy. FNAs with NS3 had significantly higher ROM (64.2%). Three-dimensional groups were significantly more frequent in malignant neoplasms (35.7%). ROM was significantly higher in AUS-nuclear subcategory (48.2%) and in AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategory (38.3%). The highest ROM was detected in AUS-nuclear1 subgroup (65.2%). ROM was significantly higher in the group including AUS-nuclear and AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategories, namely "high-risk group" than the group including other subcategories, namely "low-risk group" (42.0%vs 13.9%). In conclusion, subcategorization may not be the end point, and nuclear scoring and evaluation of architectural patterns according to strict criteria may provide data for remodeling of TBSRTC categories.

Two-tier subclassification of the Bethesda category III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) in thyroid cytology

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda category III, AUS/FLUS, comprises a heterogeneous group of thyroid lesions with variable risk of malignancy (ROM). This study evaluates ROM in two subgroups of this category based on nuclear atypia and architectural atypia.

METHODS

Cases in Bethesda category III were reported based on nuclear atypia (AUS) and architectural atypia (FLUS). ROM was calculated by comparing the cytologic diagnosis to the follow-up histologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among the 610 Bethesda category III cases in this study, 306 (50.2%) and 304 (49.8%) cases were reported as AUS and FLUS, respectively. One hundred and eighty six of 306 AUS (60.8%) and 193 of 304 FLUS (63.5%) cases underwent surgical intervention. ROM of the cases in Bethesda category III was 12.8% if all cases were counted and 20.6% if only surgical cases were counted. When analyzing separately, ROM of AUS cases was 17.0% and 28.0% with all cases and surgical cases only, respectively. For FLUS cases, ROM was 8.6% and 13.5% with all cases and surgical cases only, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In Bethesda category III, ROM in the cases with nuclear atypia was significantly higher than the cases with architectural atypia. Sub-classifying the Bethesda Category III cases with nuclear atypia and architectural atypia, respectively may better stratify the ROM.

Thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: malignancy rate in the category of indeterminate significant atypia/indeterminate significant follicular lesion

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a standard preoperative diagnostic modality for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda Thyroid Cytopathology Reporting System (TBSRTC) defines the FNAC atypia group as atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS).

OBJECTIVES

Determine the risk of malignancy after surgical resection in patients with AUS/FLUS.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Pathology department of a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All thyroid FNACs between 2015 and 2023 that were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in Turkey. Patient demographics, preoperative ultrasonographic features, and follow-up data were collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relationship between AUS/FLUS diagnosis and final histopathological diagnosis.

SAMPLE SIZE

562.

RESULTS

In total, 562 thyroid nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS, and 267 (47.5%) were surgically excised. A malignant histopathological diagnosis was given in 28 cases (10.4%). Malignancy risk sensitivity of AUS/FLUS diagnosis was 75.68% (95% CI=58.80-88.23%), specificity was 55.24% (95% CI=50.91-59.52%), positive predictive value was 10.49% (95% CI=8.71-12.58%), and negative predictive value was 97.04% (95% CI=94.86-98.31%). In the ultrasonographic data, having symptomatic nodules, nodule calcification, and irregular nodule borders were all statistically significant signs of cancer in a one-variable analysis (P<.01). The presence of a family history emerged as a statistically significant prognostic marker for malignancy (P=.012). Although not statistically significant, the malignancy rate for nodules with nuclear atypia was 11.9%, significantly higher than the rate of 8.3% for nodules with architectural atypia only (P=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of AUS/FLUS has a high rate of predicting the risk of malignancy and should continue to be offered. In addition to cytopathological features, ultrasound data and family history should be taken into consideration when evaluating the case.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and no molecular studies.

Binary subclassification scheme (AUS-Nuclear versus AUS-Other) adequately risk-stratifies thyroid fine needle aspiration specimens classified as Atypia of Undetermined Significance

INTRODUCTION

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology previously described 4 subclasses of atypia within the Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS) category: nuclear (AUS-Nuc), architectural (AUS-A), oncocytic (AUS-Onc), and atypia not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS). Accumulating evidence supports a binary AUS subclassification scheme based primarily on the presence of nuclear atypia only. The purpose of this study is to compare the risk stratification of binary versus 4-tier AUS subclassification systems among AUS nodules with molecular and/or histologic follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thyroid aspirates classified as AUS and tested using Afirma (Veracyte, Inc.) between 6/2013 and 7/2021 were included. For resected nodules, histological classification was considered as the final outcome. For unresected nodules, benign Afirma results were considered low-risk outcomes, similar to histologically benign nodules. Suspicious or nondiagnostic Afirma results were considered indeterminate outcomes. The prevalence of outcomes warranting surgery (noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP] or cancer) was calculated for each AUS subclass.

RESULTS

A total of 559 AUS nodules with Afirma testing were identified. Excluding nodules with indeterminate molecular outcomes, NIFTP/cancer prevalence for AUS-Nuc was 21% (57/266), which was higher than that for AUS-A (6%, 11/188), AUS-Onc (8%, 4/53), and AUS-NOS (0%, 0/9). A binary AUS subclassification scheme based on nuclear atypia showed a significant difference in NIFTP/cancer prevalence (21% versus 6%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Binary reporting of AUS subclasses based on nuclear atypia distinguishes cases with a higher risk of NIFTP/cancer. There is a low but non-negligible prevalence of NIFTP/cancer in cases without nuclear atypia.

Evolving approaches in paediatric thyroid cytopathology: A review

The guidelines for the workup of thyroid nodules have been established in adult populations and secondarily applied to paediatric populations. In particular, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is commonly applied to both adult and paediatric thyroid nodules. However, as paediatric nodules have distinct molecular drivers and behavioural trajectories, there is renewed interest in diagnostic and management strategies that are paediatric specific. Here, we review key differences between paediatric and adult thyroid cancer and recent literature evaluating the use of TBSRTC in paediatric populations.

The risk of malignancy in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category subgroups: a Thai institute experience

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the rate of reporting and the risk of malignancy (ROM) for atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) subgroups in a Thai population. AUS, which is category III of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, is a problematic diagnosis for thyroid nodule management because the risks of malignancy are diverse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent thyroid fine needle aspirations between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Gender, age, and nodule features were described, and all slides were re-evaluated and categorized into 2 subgroups: AUS-Nuclear (including cytology atypia and cytologic and architectural atypia) and AUS-Other (including architectural atypia, oncocytic atypia, and atypia not otherwise specified). The lower and upper limits of ROM were calculated for each subgroup.

RESULTS

Of total, 258 out of 2995 fine needle aspirations (8.6%) were diagnosed as AUS. The patients were predominantly female (88.9%), with a mean age of 54.1 years. The average nodule size was 2.5 cm. Of the 258 AUS patients, 81 (38.9%) had histological correlations. The ROM for the AUS category was 9.1% to 23.5%. The ROM of the AUS-Nuclear and AUS-Other were 11.1% to 27.3% and 2.2% to 6.7%, respectively. Features of pseudonuclear inclusions had the highest ROM (33.3%-42.9%), followed by pale chromatin (28.57%-47.06%).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than ten percent of our interpretations were AUS, which is acceptable in our practice. Cytological atypia harbored the highest ROM. Studies of associations between cytology and histology may aid in improving diagnostic criteria for this population.

Use of molecular testing results to analyze the overuse of atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid cytology

INTRODUCTION

The suggested atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) rate for thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies is 10% or less. Prompted by a high institutional AUS rate, we examined using molecular testing results (MTR) as a potential quality metric tool to reduce the AUS rate. We correlated MTR with AUS cytologic findings, surgical pathology follow-up, and individual pathologist AUS rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic data, cytologic diagnoses, MTR, and surgical pathology diagnoses were retrospectively obtained. MTR were classified as either positive or negative. AUS rates and MTR proportions were compared among pathologists. The cytomorphologic features of 143 AUS cases were assessed and correlated with MTR.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2022, 710 of 3247 thyroid fine-needle aspirations were classified as AUS, with a yearly average rate of 22% (range = 19%-26%). AUS cases included: 331 (47%) with architectural atypia; 204 (29%) with oncocytic (Hürthle cell) atypia; 99 (14%) with combined architectural and cytologic atypia; and 76 (10%) with isolated cytologic atypia. Most AUS cases with molecular testing had negative MTR (360/492, 73%). AUS with cytologic atypia had higher positive MTR risk (logarithm of odds ratio = 1.27, 95% credible interval [0.5-2.04], P = 0.001). The average positive MTR rate by pathologist was 21.5% (range 0%-35%); higher positive MTR rates had better correlation with subsequent neoplastic/malignant histologic diagnoses. The MTR sensitivity for malignant disease was 89% and the negative predictive value was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

MTR analysis reveals the importance of cytologic atypia as a determinant of malignancy risk in AUS cases. Periodic analysis of MTR data alongside individual pathologist AUS rates can help refine diagnostic criteria and potentially reduce AUS overuse.

Effective Use of microRNA, BRAF and Sonographic Risk Assessment in Bethesda III Thyroid Nodules Requires a Different Approach to Nodules with Features of Nuclear Atypia and Other Types of Atypia

The aim of the study was to analyze the diagnostic usefulness of the combined assessment of the ultrasound risk category of the nodule (evaluated with EU-TIRADS system), the presence of BRAF V600E mutation and the expression of selected microRNAs (miR-146b, miR-221 and miR-222) in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules, separately for cases with nuclear atypia (AUS-nuclear) and cases with other types of atypia (AUS-other). We evaluated 161 nodules (66 AUS-nuclear and 95 AUS-other) with known results of postoperative histopathological examination. The rate of cancer and the rate of PTC among cancers were nearly three times higher in the AUS-nuclear than the AUS-other group. For AUS-nuclear nodules, the most effective diagnostic panel included, in addition to repeat FNA, the assessment of BRAF V600E mutation and the expression of miR-146b and miR-222 (sensitivity: 93.5%, specificity: 80.0%). For AUS-other nodules, a two-step procedure was most effective: at the first stage, forgoing surgical treatment in subjects with a benign repeat FNA outcome, and, at the second stage, the assessment of miR-222 expression and the EU-TIRADS category (sensitivity: 92.3%, specificity: 76.8%). The optimal use of molecular methods in the diagnostics of category III thyroid nodules requires a separate approach for nodules with nuclear atypia and nodules with other types of atypia.

Performance of ACR TI-RADS and the Bethesda System in Predicting Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules at a Large Children's Hospital and a Comprehensive Review of the Pediatric Literature

While thyroid nodules are less common in children than in adults, they are more frequently malignant. However, pediatric data are scarce regarding the performance characteristics of imaging and cytopathology classification systems validated to predict the risk of malignancy (ROM) in adults and select those patients who require fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and possibly surgical resection. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients 18 years of age or younger who underwent thyroid FNA at our institution from 1 July 2015 to 31 May 2022. Based on surgical follow-up from 74 of the 208 FNA cases, we determined the ROM for the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) ultrasound risk stratification system and The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and added our results to those of pediatric cohorts from other institutions already published in the literature. We found the following ROMs for 1458 cases using ACR TI-RADS (TR): TR1. Benign: 2.2%, TR2. Not Suspicious: 9.3%, TR3. Mildly Suspicious: 16.6%, TR4. Moderately Suspicious: 27.0%, and TR5. Highly Suspicious 76.5%; and for 5911 cases using the Bethesda system: Bethesda I. Unsatisfactory: 16.8%, Bethesda II. Benign: 7.2%, Bethesda III: Atypia of Undetermined Significance: 29.6%, Bethesda IV. Follicular Neoplasm: 42.3%, Bethesda V. Suspicious for Malignancy: 90.8%, and Bethesda VI. Malignant: 98.8%. We conclude that ACR TI-RADS levels imply higher ROMs for the pediatric population than the corresponding suggested ROMs for adults, and, in order to avoid missing malignancies, we should consider modifying or altogether abandoning size cutoffs for recommending FNA in children and adolescents whose thyroid glands are smaller than those of adults. The Bethesda categories also imply higher ROMs for pediatric patients compared to adults.

Preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules - Diagnosis and management strategies

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy, with increasing incidence over the past few decades. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is the gold standard for preoperative diagnosis of thyroid malignancies. Nevertheless, this method renders indeterminate results in up to 30% of the cases. Therefore, these patients are often referred to unnecessary surgery to establish the diagnosis. To improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, several other ways, such as ultrasonography, elastography, immunohistochemical analysis, genetic testing, and core needle biopsy, have been developed and can be used either in association with or as an alternative to FNA. This review aims to evaluate all these diagnostic tools to determine the most appropriate way of managing thyroid nodules and subsequently improve the selection of cases referred to surgery.

A Triumvirate:: Correlating Thyroid Cytopathology, Molecular Testing, and Histopathology

Risk stratification is essential in the preoperative evaluation and management of thyroid nodules, most of which are benign. Advances in DNA and RNA sequencing have shed light on the molecular drivers of thyroid cancer. Molecular testing of cytologically indeterminate nodules has helped refine risk stratification, triage patients for surgery, and determine the extent of surgery. Molecular platforms with high negative predictive values can help identify nodules that may be spared surgery and can be managed conservatively. Here we discuss the importance of integrating cytomorphologic, molecular, and histologic features to help avoid errors and improve patient management.

The influence of papillary features on the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to the assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid lesions that were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS when using a novel cytology subclassification system that is based on the presence or absence of papillary features.

METHODS

AUS/FLUS case cytology was re-reviewed and subclassified into minor or major concern groups based upon the absence or presence of papillary features, respectively. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated and compared between the two groups. Inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was also measured.

RESULTS

The minor concern group had a 12.6% associated ROM, while the major concern group had a significantly higher ROM (58.4%), (P < 0.001). Based on 108 cases, the inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was 79%, and the κ value was 0.47.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of papillary features significantly increases the ROM in thyroid lesions with an AUS/FLUS diagnosis.

Probability of malignancy as determined by ThyroSeq v3 genomic classifier varies according to the subtype of atypia

BACKGROUND

ThyroSeq assesses the probability of malignancy (POM) in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). The authors investigated whether defined AUS subcategories are associated with specific molecular alterations, the molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM), and the risk of malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

Fine-needle aspiration cytology reports of AUS and corresponding results from the ThyroSeq version 3 genomic classifier results were retrieved and subcategorized as follicular cells with either cytologic atypia (FC-C), architectural atypia (FC-A), both cytologic and architectural atypia (FC-CA), or a predominance of Hurthle cells (PHC). The MDROM, ROM, and frequency of molecular alterations by subcategory were computed and analyzed, and p < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 541 cases subdivided into 233 with FC-A, 104 with FC-C, 116 with FC-CA, and 88 with PHC. The benign call rate and positive call rate for the AUS category were 72% and 28%, respectively, which varied between AUS subcategories. The MDROM by subcategory was 15.9% FC-A, 20.5% FC-C, 33.8% FC-CA, and 14.4% PHC. Histologic follow-up was available for 155 (28%) AUS cases with a follow-up period ≥12 months. The 95% confidence intervals of the MDROMs overlapped with the ROMs. The highest MDROM and ROM were in the FC-CA subcategory. RAS mutations were present in all subcategories. BRAF V600E mutations and papillary thyroid carcinoma were most frequent in the FC-CA subcategory. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features was significantly more frequent in the FC-C subcategory.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results demonstrated that AUS subcategories are associated with specific genetic alterations, the MDROM, and the ROM. Molecular results and an awareness of various cancer probabilities within AUS subcategories can allow for a more tailored management.

Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Does Not Influence the Malignancy Risk in Nodules of Category III in the Bethesda System

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (RoM) in category III thyroid nodules of the Bethesda system in patients with and without Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) and to analyze whether obtaining category III with a repeat FNA (rFNA) increases RoM. The study included 563 HT and 1250 non-HT patients; rFNA was performed in 349 and 575 patients, and surgical treatment in 160 and 390, respectively. There was no difference in RoM between HT and non-HT patients in the whole examined population (lower limit of RoM), nor in operated patients (upper limit of RoM), HT: 5.0−17.5%, non-HT: 4.7−15.1%. RoM in patients with AUS nodules (with nuclear atypia) was similar in both groups (HT: 21.7−40.0%, non-HT: 16.9−41.4%), as it was in patients with FLUS nodules (with architectural atypia) (HT: 3.5−13.3%, non-HT: 4.0−13.0%). In patients from both groups together, with category III diagnosed twice and AUS identified at least once, RoM was 16.7−50.0% and it was higher than that in patients with FLUS nodule diagnosed twice: 3.2−13.0% (p < 0.005). Concluding, RoM in category III nodules is not affected by the presence of HT. Subcategorization of category III nodules (FLUS vs. AUS) may provide guidance toward further follow-up or surgery in both groups.

Approach to Bethesda system category III thyroid nodules according to US-risk stratification

This study evaluated how to manage Bethesda category III (Bethesda III) (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS]) thyroid nodules according to the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) to reduce unnecessary surgeries. A total of 161 thyroid nodules diagnosed as Bethesda III underwent surgery from 2016 to 2019. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) was used for repeat examination. K-TIRADS category was assigned to the thyroid nodules. The proportion of malignancy in Bethesda III nodules confirmed by surgery were significantly increased in proportion relative to K-TIRADS with 60.0% low suspicion, 88.2% intermediate suspicion, and 100% high suspicion nodules (p < 0.001). The proportion of malignancy in AUS and FLUS were significantly different (94.2% vs. 40.0% p = 0.003). The proportion of malignancy in AUS increased with K-TIRADS categories, but there was no difference in FLUS. All K-TIRADS high suspicion nodules were AUS as papillary carcinomas (99%), while 80% of FLUS nodules and 50% of follicular carcinomas showed K-TIRADS low suspicion. In 116 nodules with repeat FNA or CNB after initial Bethesda III results, the conclusive result rate was significantly increased in proportion to K-TIRADS with 58.3% low suspicion, 83.3% intermediate suspicion, and 88.8% high suspicion nodules (p = 0.015). K-TIRADS low suspicion nodules of Bethesda III nodules should be managed after risk-benefit consideration rather than immediate surgery or repeat examination. K-TIRADS for Bethesda III nodules can predict papillary carcinoma well, but not follicular carcinoma.

Low reproducibility of equivocal categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology makes the associated risk of malignancy specific to the diagnostic center

PURPOSE

Equivocal categories (III, IV, V) of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (BSRTC) are characterized by high variability of the estimated risk of malignancy. The aim of the study was to analyze the reproducibility of classification of nodules into an equivocal category and the frequency of malignancy (FoM) observed in such categories.

METHODS

Five experienced cytopathologists from three centers (A, B, C) independently performed reclassification of smears obtained from 213 thyroid nodules with equivocal routine cytology and known results of the postoperative histopathological examination.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement among all cytopathologists was poor, with a Krippendorff's alpha coefficient equaling 0.34. The intra-center agreement was higher than the inter-center (fair vs poor). Pathologists of the center A classified smears into categories II and III significantly less often and categories IV and V more often than pathologists of centers B and C. The joint FoM of nodules classified into any of categories IV-VI (regarded as an indication for surgery) was different among centers (A: 40.0%, B: 66.7%, C: 80.6%). The FoM of category III nodules with features of nuclear atypia (AUS) in center B and C was two times higher than that of other nodules of category III (FLUS), while in center A the FoM was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of published data on the risk of malignancy in nodules of particular BSRTC categories without concern for the uniqueness of the diagnostic center may lead to erroneous conclusions.

Are the anatomical, clinical, and ultrasound characteristics of thyroid nodules with Bethesda III or IV cytology and ACR TI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 able to refine the indications for molecular diagnostic tests?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association of clinical, anatomical, and ultrasound (US) characteristics of malignancies in Bethesda III or IV (III-B or IV-B) thyroid nodules.

METHODS

The association between malignancies and the following variables were analyzed: III-B or IV-B, age < 55 years and ≥ 55 years, sex, family history of thyroid cancer, history of irradiation, nodule size, and ACR TI-RADS classification in 62 participants who underwent thyroidectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 62 participants, 87.1% (54/62) were women, 74.2% were < 55 years old, 95.2% had no family history of thyroid cancer, 56.5% had nodules < 2 cm in size, 62.9% were IV-B, and 69.4% were ACR TI-RADS 4. Thirty-two patients had thyroid carcinoma, and 30 had benign histology. Among all factors associated with malignancy, only ACR TI-RADS 5 classification on US was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.014), while III-B with architectural atypia cytological classification was the only one significantly associated with benign status (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Only a high risk of malignancy as assessed using US was able to refine the indication for molecular tests in a group of patients with indeterminate nodules. We found 85% (53/62) of III-B or IV-B thyroid nodules would benefit from available molecular diagnostic tests.

Atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid cytology: Nuclear atypia and architectural atypia are associated with different molecular alterations and risks of malignancy

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology contains an atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category with heterogeneous and distinct inclusion criteria. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in malignancy rates and molecular alterations based on the presence of different criteria.

METHODS

A laboratory information search was conducted to identify thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens signed out as AUS. The cases were reclassified as architectural atypia (3A), cytologic atypia (3C), both architectural and cytologic atypia (3B), or Hürthle cell aspirate (3H). Surgical follow-up and concurrent molecular test results, if available, were collected.

RESULTS

Five hundred ten specimens, including 258 reclassified as 3A, 40 reclassified as 3B, 119 reclassified as 3C, and 86 reclassified as 3H, were identified. The risks of malignancy for the subcategories were 13.4%, 26.3%, 44.1%, and 13.8%, respectively. Additionally, BRAF V600E mutations were more prevalent in specimens with cytologic atypia (3B/3C), whereas low-risk alterations, including KRAS, PTEN, and PAX8-PPARy2, were more prevalent in those with architectural atypia (3A).

CONCLUSIONS

Subdividing AUS specimens on the basis of the type of atypia can yield categories associated with distinct molecular alterations and risks of malignancy.

Combined molecular and histologic end points inform cancer risk estimates for thyroid nodules classified as atypia of undetermined significance

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules classified as atypia of uncertain significance (AUS) on fine-needle aspiration cytology are heterogeneous. Prior studies reported a higher risk of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP)/cancer among AUS nodules that had cytologic (AUS-C) versus architectural (AUS-A) atypia; however, such studies were generally confined to resected cohorts, introducing bias into risk calculations. The authors hypothesized that combined histologic and molecular end points would permit clinically meaningful calculations of NIFTP/malignancy risk among AUS nodules.

METHODS

The study consisted of 279 thyroid nodules classified as AUS on initial fine-needle aspiration and tested by the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) between June 2013 and October 2017. Results of GEC testing and histopathologic diagnoses were stratified by AUS classifiers. The AUS-A category was further subclassified as 1) hypocellular microfollicular or 2) cellular with mixed but predominantly microfollicular architecture. NIFTP/cancer risk was calculated for each subgroup, with the inclusion of unresected nodules that had benign GEC results as low-risk end points comparable to histologically benign nodules.

RESULTS

When only histologic end points were considered, there was no difference in NIFTP/cancer risk (25% vs 23%; P = .82). By using molecular and histologic end points, AUS cases with cytologic atypia trended toward higher NIFTP/cancer risk than AUS-A cases (14% vs 6%; P = .06). Furthermore, AUS-A cases showed a trend toward lower NIFTP/cancer risk for hypocellular microfollicular aspirates (3%) compared with cellular samples that had mixed/predominantly microfollicular architecture (13%; P = .18).

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of unresected benign GEC nodules in risk-of-malignancy calculations provides more accurate results, which may be helpful for informing patient management as well as quality improvement in the cytopathology laboratory.

A Large Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cohort with Long-Term Population-Based Follow-Up

Background: Prior studies evaluating thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) have limited the calculation of risk of malignancy (ROM) to cytologic specimens with corresponding histologic specimens, and clinical follow-up for those patients who do not undergo immediate surgery has been largely disregarded. Moreover, there is marked variability in how researchers have approached thyroid FNAB statistical analyses. This study addresses the urgent need for information from a large cohort of patients with long-term clinical follow-up to more accurately determine the performance of thyroid FNAB and ROM for each diagnostic category. Methods: A retrospective review of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), pathology database for thyroid FNABs from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2004, was performed. Diagnoses were coded using the 2017 The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), and patients were matched to both the UCSF cancer registry and California Cancer Registry. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and stratified by TBSRTC diagnostic category. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate incidence rates of malignancy, stratified by FNAB category. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the instantaneous ROM. Results: Initial FNABs from 2207 patients were included. Median follow-up period after the first thyroid FNAB was 13.9 years (range: 10.5-18.4 years). During follow-up, there were 279 confirmed diagnoses of thyroid malignancy. Estimates derived from Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the risk of having a thyroid malignancy was low for nondiagnostic and benign categories, intermediate for atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), AUS/FLUS combined, and follicular neoplasm, and high for suspicious and malignant categories. A total of 52/1575 false-negative cases (3.2%) were identified. Excluding papillary microcarcinomas, the false-negative rate was 1.5% (23/1575). No patients with a false-negative diagnosis died of thyroid cancer during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Asymptomatic patients with low-risk clinical and radiologic features and initially benign or unsatisfactory biopsy are unlikely to develop thyroid malignancy and highly unlikely to die of thyroid cancer. FNAB is highly accurate in detecting malignancy. Additional studies evaluating similar large data sets after the adoption of TBSRTC and the integration of molecular testing are needed.

Subclassification of the Bethesda Category III (AUS/FLUS): A study of thyroid FNA cytology based on ThinPrep slides from the National Cancer Center in China

BACKGROUND

The atypia of an undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is a heterogeneous category, which includes various cell patterns. The subclassification of AUS/FLUS was suggested in the 2017 TBSRTC. However, the risk of malignancy (ROM) associated with different subgroups remains unresolved. Herein, AUS/FLUS aspirates were subclassified, from which the ROM of each subgroup was determined.

METHODS

All cases undergoing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) from July 2013 to December 2018 were reviewed. Of 12,913 thyroid FNAs, 1053 (8.2%) were AUS/FLUS. The slides of 222 patients with AUS/FLUS with surgical follow-up were reviewed and subclassified according to the recommendations of the 2017 TBSRTC. There were 195 aspirates consistently diagnosed as AUS/FLUS and subclassified as cytologic atypia 1 (AUS-C1); cytologic atypia 2 (AUS-C2); architectural atypia (AUS-A); cytologic and architectural atypia (AUS-C&A); Hürthle cell aspirates (AUS-H); atypia, not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS); and atypical lymphoid cells, rule out lymphoma (AUS-L).

RESULTS

Malignancy was identified in 83.3% (185 of 222) of the AUS/FLUS nodules. The AUS-C1 group was the most common (62.1%), followed by the AUS-C&A (12.8%), AUS-C2 (10.8%), AUS-H (6.7%), AUS-NOS (5.6%), AUS-L (1.5%), and AUS-A (0.5%) groups. AUS-C1 had the highest ROM (92.6%) among the groups and varied significantly from that of the AUS-C&A (P = .171), AUS-C2 (P = .001), AUS-H (P = .001), and AUS-NOS (P < .001) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As a heterogeneous category of TBSRTC, the ROM for AUS/FLUS varies greatly among medical centers. Subclassification of AUS/FLUS might be helpful in identifying nodules with a high ROM in this category and improving the management of such nodules.

Combining the American Thyroid Association's Ultrasound Classification with Cytological Subcategorization Improves the Assessment of Malignancy Risk in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Background: The risk of malignancy (RoM) of indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) shows a high variability in interinstitutional cohorts. The RoM is partially associated with the cytological degree of atypia and the ultrasound (US) pattern. This study evaluated the cancer risk of ITNs by jointly considering the cytological subcategory and the American Thyroid Association (ATA)-based US risk classification. Methods: This study features a retrospective cohort from two Brazilian centers comprising 238 ITNs with confirmed outcomes. US classification, according to ATA-based guidelines, and cytological subcategorization were determined. The cytological subgroups were as follows: (1) nuclear atypia (NA) related to papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) but insufficient to categorize the cytology as suspicious for malignancy; (2) architectural atypia without NA (AA); (3) both architectural and nuclear atypia (ANA); (4) oncocytic pattern (OP) without NA; and (5) NA not related to PTC (NANP). NA was divided into three subgroups: nuclear size and shape, nuclear membrane appearance, and/or chromatin aspects. Results: The overall frequency of malignancy was 39.5%. Among the cytological subcategories, the highest RoM was related to the NA (43.9%) and to the ANA (43.5%), followed by AA (29.4%), and OP (9.4%). NA was positively and independently associated with cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 4.5; confidence interval [CI: 1.2-16.6]) as was the occurrence of ANA (OR 6.6 [CI 1.5-29.5]). AA and OP were not independently associated with cancer. Both ATA-based high- and intermediate-risk categories showed an independent association with cancer (OR 6.8 [CI 2.9-15.5] and OR: 2.6 [CI 1.1-5.8], respectively). ITNs with cytological findings of NA or ANA when combined with intermediate US patterns had RoM values of 47.5% and 56.7%, respectively. Both cytological subcategories, when combined with the ATA high-suspicion class reached an RoM >70%. The type of NA with the highest odds for cancer was related to the nuclear membrane (OR 11.5). Conclusions: The RoM of ITNs can reach almost 80% when both NA and ATA-based high-risk US features are present. The presence of such cytological features also increased the RoM in the ATA-based intermediate-risk US category. In addition, AA and OP were not independently related to higher cancer risk. These results strengthen the recommendations for combing cytological subcategorization and US risk classification in the workup for ITNs before the decision of a molecular testing, clinical observation, or diagnostic surgery.

Outcome of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: A six-year institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is one of six diagnostic categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC). The goal of our study is to assess the outcome of cases classified as AUS/FLUS at our institution.

METHODS

AUS/FLUS cases were identified by computer searching of the thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases performed between 2010 and 2016. Outcomes were categorized as: follow-up surgery, repeat FNA or no follow-up available. Demographics, ultrasound findings and FNA diagnostic criteria were reviewed for AUS/FLUS cases with follow-up surgical pathology diagnosis.

RESULTS

Our AUS/FLUS thyroid FNA rate was 6% (117 out of 1984 FNAs). Only 15% of the AUS/FLUS cases had repeat FNA, while 41% underwent surgery. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for cases with follow-up surgery was 17%. When considering all AUS/FLUS cases, the ROM was 7%. Statistically, benign neoplasms were more likely to be single lesions on ultrasound comparing to malignant neoplasms, and to exhibit architectural atypia as opposed to non-neoplastic lesions on FNA. The malignancy rates among patients that directly went to surgical resection (17%) and patients having repeat FNA after the first AUS/FLUS diagnosis followed by surgery (29%) was not significantly different. However, repeat FNA was able to reclassify the majority of cases into more definitive categories.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of the thyroid FNAs diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in our institution meets the benchmark statistics for AUS/FLUS rate and ROM. This study constitutes a valuable quality assurance measure and serves as a baseline for subsequent quality improvement.

The Correlation of Age with Prognosis of Atypia of Undetermined Significance and Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Nodules

Purpose

Although some prognostic variables and risk factors for thyroid cancer (TC) are age-related, the association between age and the risk of TC in patients with thyroid nodules (TNs) assigned to atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is poorly estimated. The aim of this study was to assess the histopathology of AUS/FLUS and the risk of TC according to the age of the patients at the time of AUS/FLUS diagnosis.

Patients and Methods

Among 5021 individuals treated for TNs at one institution from 2008 to 2018, 161 (3.2%) patients with 161 TNs assigned to the AUS/FLUS category (1 nodule per patient) were selected and stratified by age at initial diagnosis: <55 years, 55–75 years and >75 years. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association of age with the risk of TC diagnosis.

Results

Ninety-one (56.52%) patients <55 years old, 58 (36.02%) patients 55–75 years old, and 12 (7.45%) individuals >75 years old were identified. There were 130 (80.7%) females and 31 (19.3%) males with a mean age of 50.6 ± 16.12 years. Among the evaluated TNs, 142 (88.2%) were ultimately diagnosed as benign, and 19 (11.8%) were diagnosed as malignant. Younger age in patients was significantly related to malignancy outcome (p=0.024 for age <55 years). Patients aged 55–75 years had a significantly lower risk of TC than the other age categories (p=0.040). The risks of high vascularity and fast tumor growth were significantly higher in the youngest category than in the other categories (age <55 years old: p=0.045 and p=0.002, respectively).

Conclusion

Although patients with TNs classified as AUS/FLUS by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (UG-FNAB) are not typically qualified for surgery, it is worth noting that younger patients with an AUS/FLUS diagnosis might be at a higher risk of TC.

Molecular Testing for BRAFV600E and RAS Mutations from Cytoscrapes of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspirates: A Single-Center Pilot Study

Context and Aim:

Molecular testing of thyroid FNA has been advocated in the indeterminate categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) 2018. The utility of cytoscrapes of thyroid FNA samples for BRAF V600E and RAS mutations was evaluated in this pilot study.

Methods and Materials:

Thyroid FNA samples between 2015 and 2018 from TBSRTC categories 3–6 were included. DNA was extracted from one to two representative smears (cytoscrape). Real-time PCR for BRAF V600E and RAS (KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS) gene mutations was performed. Histopathology correlation was available in 44 cases.

Statistical Methods:

Chi-square test and calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were performed.

Results:

A total of 73 thyroid FNA cases and 11 nodal metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) were evaluated. The DNA yield ranged from 1.9 to 666 ng/μl (mean 128 ng/μl) in 80 cases and was insufficient in four cases. Overall, mutations were seen in 45 (56.25%) cases with BRAF V600E, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS in 21 (46.7%), 19 (42.2%), 4, and 1 cases, respectively. BRAF V600E mutation was seen in PTC (11/18, 61%), nodal PTC metastases (5/10, 50%), and occasionally in TBSRTC category 3 (1/18, 5.5%). NRAS mutations were seen across all categories and were maximum in the AUS/FLUS group (6/18, 33%). BRAF V600E /RAS testing had an overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 61.7%, 80%, 91.3%, and 38%, respectively, for the detection of malignancy. In indeterminate thyroid nodules, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 56.2%, 80%, 81.8%, and 53.3%, respectively.

Conclusion:

BRAF V600E/RAS mutation testing from cytoscrapes are useful as a rule-in test for indeterminate thyroid nodules and provide molecular confirmation in nodal metastases of PTC.

Is Subdivision of Atypia of Undetermined Significance AUS/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Cases According to Detailed Nuclear Features Vital for Assessing the Risk of Malignancy?

Background:

It has been known that the “atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)” category is the most problematic category in Bethesda system due to its highly heterogeneous morphological features. Recently, it has been reported that aspirates including nuclear atypia in the AUS/FLUS category have a higher risk of malignancy.

Aims:

This study aimed to assess each nuclear property in aspirates with cytological atypia and also to determine the relationship with the risk of malignancy.

Material and Methods:

We reviewed 980 AUS/FLUS fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) performed between '2012 and 2019' at a single institution. We classified these aspirates into four groups: AUS-N (nuclear atypia), AUS-A (architectural atypia), AUS-H (Hurthle cell change), and AUS-O (other). Nuclear features were detailed sub-classified; size and shape (enlargement, elongation, and overlapping), membrane irregularities (irregular contours, grooves, pseudoinclusion), and chromatin characteristics (pale chromatin). The estimated risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each subgroup.

Results:

Of 980 AUS/FLUS cases, follow-up histological outcome data were available for 209 cases. Among these cases, the estimated ROM was 27.8%. The ROM were 26.4%, 15.4%, and 22.5% for AUS-N, A, and H, respectively. The most common nuclear findings associated with ROM were nuclear groove (67.9%); irregular contours (76.9%) suspected pseudoinclusion (100%) and overlapping (56%) (P < 0,001). But nuclear findings such as nuclear enlargement, mild pleomorphism, or pale chromatin have a similar ROM as architectural atypia.

Conclusion:

Although it is known that the presence of cytological atypia in an AUS/FLUS nodule increases the estimated risk of malignancy, all nuclear properties are not equally effective in predicting malignancy risk. Emphasizing nuclear atypia details in reports of AUS case may be a more sensitive way to identify nodules with a high risk of malignancy.

Hürthle cell lesions of the thyroid: Progress made and challenges remaining

Hürthle cell-predominant thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNA) are encountered frequently in routine practice, yet they are often challenging to diagnose accurately and are associated with significant interobserver variability. This is largely due to the ubiquity of Hürthle cells in thyroid pathology, ranging from nonneoplastic conditions to aggressive malignancies. Although limitations in cytomorphologic diagnoses likely will remain for the foreseeable future, our knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of Hürthle cell neoplasia and application of molecular testing to cytologic material have increased dramatically within the past decade. This review provides context behind the challenges in diagnosis of Hürthle cell lesions and summarizes the more recent advances in diagnostic tools.

What is Thy3a? A study of 336 Thy3a (AUS/FLUS) thyroid FNAs with histology compares UK RCPath with other reporting systems and shows how Thy3a subclassification can improve risk stratification and help address overuse of this category

INTRODUCTION

Thy3a (AUS/FLUS) is an indeterminate and heterogeneous category in thyroid cytology. Thy3a reporting rates vary widely, with many laboratories documenting overuse. Subclassification of Thy3a helps with risk stratification. We aimed to investigate whether subclassification can also help address Thy3a overuse. We compare the UK reporting system with other terminologies.

METHODS

An audit of thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) reported at our institution between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Thy3a FNAs followed by histology were reviewed and subcategorised into four subgroups: Scanty Atypia (SA), Scanty Microfollicular (SMF), Favour Benign (FB) and Thyroiditis versus Neoplasm (TVN). Review and subclassification were blinded to histology outcomes. FNAs were correlated with histology and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Our Thy3a rate was high (24% of all thyroid FNAs). For 336 Thy3a FNAs with histology, the malignancy rates of the four subgroups were: SA 68%, SMF 20%, FB 4%, TVN 31%. There were significant associations between subgroup and malignancy risk, and between subgroup and tumour risk. On histology, SA had more malignancies than expected and FB had fewer. SA and SMF had more tumours than expected and FB had fewer. SMF and Thy3f FNAs were similar in terms of tumour and malignancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclassification of Thy3a FNAs into these four subgroups is recommended. This can improve risk stratification and help address overuse of Thy3a. We propose that some FB and SMF cases could be safely diverted to Thy2 and Thy3f respectively. We compare various reporting terminologies and question how indeterminate FNAs should be classified.

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian vs. non-Asian practice, and the Singapore experience

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has paved the way for comparisons of the practice of thyroid cytology in many different regions. However, there have been comparatively few studies documenting differences between Asian and non-Asian practice. Here, we aim to compare a few key parameters between the two regions, focusing on the indeterminate category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS). We compared its incidence, resection rates (RRs), risk of malignancy (ROM), rate of repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA), ROMs of cytomorphologic subcategories of nuclear atypia (AUS-N) vs. architectural atypia (AUS-A), and, finally, the incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) vs. follicular neoplasms (FNs) in resected AUS/FLUS cases in Asian and non-Asian regions. Where possible, these metrics were compared with the Singapore experience from a tertiary referral institution. While the incidence of AUS/FLUS was similar in both regions, we found geographical differences in the RRs and ROMs, which may reflect a higher collective threshold for surgery in Asian countries. However, both cohorts showed higher ROMs in the AUS-N subcategory as compared to the AUS-A subcategory, supporting the subclassification of the AUS/FLUS based on the presence of nuclear atypia. We also observed a higher incidence of AUS-N coupled with a higher incidence of PTC in resected AUS/FLUS nodules in Asian cohorts, while AUS-A and follicular-patterned neoplasms featured more prominently in the non-Asian cohorts. These incidences may account for the starkly different molecular approaches that we noted-in Asian (chiefly Korean and Chinese) centers, BRAF mutational analysis was favored, while gene panels and gene expression classifiers were more frequently applied in non-Asian centers (chiefly in the United States of America). Overall, the data from Singapore appears more closely aligned to non-Asian trends, despite its geographical location in Southeast Asia and its predominantly Asian population. We conclude that there is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of the AUS/FLUS categories between and within regions, which is only partially explained by regional variations, and may also reflect different regional diagnostic and management practices. This highlights the importance of understanding the local context in the interpretation of indeterminate Bethesda categories, rather than adopting a "one-size fits all" approach.

An institutional experience: A retrospective analysis of the effect of transitioning from follicular lesion of undetermined significance to atypia of undetermined significance with subclassified atypia on interobserver concordance, rates of neoplasia, and rates of malignancy

INTRODUCTION

The rate of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNA) classified under "atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), including Hürthle cell type (HLUS)" category of The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) in literature is highly variable. The 2018 TBSRTC was updated to note a preferred categorization of AUS cases into subcategories. This study evaluates the impact of AUS subclassification on rates of neoplasia (RON), rates of malignancy (ROM), and cytopathologist (CP) concordance.

METHODS

93 thyroid FNAs previously diagnosed as FLUS or HLUS from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014 with subsequent surgical resection were identified. Four CPs reclassified these cases using TBSRTC AUS subcategories of follicular cells with architectural and/or cytologic atypia, predominantly Hürthle cells, and atypical lymphocytes. RON and ROM were calculated for each diagnostic subcategory for each CP.

RESULTS

The original RON and ROM for FLUS cases were 31.4% and 15.1% and were 77.8% and 22.2% for HLUS cases. 10.8% of cases showed diagnostic concordance amongst the four CPs. The most frequently utilized subcategory was architectural atypia. RON ranges for architectural atypia, cytologic atypia, architectural and cytologic atypia, and predominantly Hürthle cells were 28.1% to 35.7%, 0% to 33.3%, 35.3% to 66.7%, and 57.1% to 87.5%. The range of ROM was 13.9% to 16.7%, 0% to 33%, 0% to 42.9%, and 0% to 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RON for AUS predominantly Hürthle cells subcategory was higher than previously reported, which may indicate use for tailored patient management pathways. AUS subclassification can result in significant interobserver variability. Therefore, institutions may consider consensus/quality control sessions to optimize diagnostic concordance.

Strategy to reduce unnecessary surgeries in thyroid nodules with cytology of Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS): a retrospective analysis of 667 patients diagnosed by surgery

PURPOSE

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is widely used for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules detected by ultrasonography. However, the cytology of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) often leads to unnecessary thyroid surgery. This study aimed to identify a strategy to reduce unnecessary surgeries in patients with AUS/FLUS nodules.

METHODS

Medical records of 667 patients with the cytology of AUS/FLUS who underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological data were analyzed to identify malignant factors in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS. Factors were compared between patients with thyroid cancer and those with benign thyroid nodules, using stepwise multivariate logistic regression and decision tree model.

RESULTS

Pathological thyroid cancer was identified in 193 (43.3%) patients. There was a significant difference in malignancy incidence with respect to family history, number of nodules, number of FNAs, ultrasonographic finding, lymphocytic thyroiditis, and BRAFV600E mutation. Multivariate analysis showed that ultrasonography (K-TIRADS 5) was the most influential independent predictor of malignancy in AUS/FLUS (odds ratio = 11.02, p < 0.001), followed by possessing BRAFV600E mutation (odds ratio = 4.54, p < 0.001). This strategy enabled 226 (89.3%) patients to avoid unnecessary surgeries based on the decision tree model. There was no node of repeated FNA in the decision tree model, which reduced the risk of malignancy (odds ratio = 0.35, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

K-TIRADS 5 and BRAFV600E mutation were predictive of malignancy in nodules of AUS/FLUS. These factors should be considered in strategies to reduce unnecessary surgeries for AUS/FLUS.

Usage and Diagnostic Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published by Korean Authors

Objectives

The usefulness of core needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules remains controversial, and preferences vary across hospitals. The purpose of this study was to assess the actual use of CNB in Korea and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of CNB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of papers published by Korean authors.

Methods

A meta-analysis of full-text publications published in English presenting data from Korea retrieved from the Embase literature database was performed.

Results

CNB led to a significantly lower proportion of non-diagnostic results than fine-needle aspiration (FNA). However, the frequency of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) did not decrease as a result of performing CNB in nodules with initial AUS/FLUS results, while it increased in consecutive cases. A subcategory analysis of AUS/FLUS showed that the increased frequency of AUS/FLUS findings on CNB was due to more frequent diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm, which resulted in a higher frequency of inconclusive findings in consecutive cases compared to FNA. Hospitals favoring CNB had a higher proportion of AUS/FLUS diagnoses. Although the complication rate did not differ significantly between CNB and FNA, serious complications of CNB did occur.

Conclusion

A reduced frequency of non-diagnostic results may be a definite advantage of CNB over FNA. However, the increased frequency of diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm should be considered when selecting CNB as a diagnostic tool.

Malignancy Rate in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia or Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance

Introduction  Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is one of the six diagnostic categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. The prevalence of malignancy among Bethesda category III cytology is variable, ranging from 5% to 37% in the literature. Objective  To determine the rate of malignancy in thyroid nodules reported as Bethesda category III. Methods  A total of 495 patients underwent surgical intervention for thyroid nodules from January 2015 to December 2017. The present study included 81 cases reported as Bethesda category III, and their medical records were reviewed. Results  Out of 495 fine-needle aspiration cytology samples, 81 (16.4%) samples were labeled as AUS/FLUS. Among these 81 patients, the mean age was 43.0 years (± 13.9), with only 11 (14%) patients older than 55 years of age. Most of our patients were female ( n  = 69; 85.2%), and the rest were male. The rate of malignancy based on the final histology was of 33.3% ( n  = 27). The majority were 17 cases (21%) of papillary carcinoma, followed by follicular carcinoma ( n  = 6) (7.4%). Conclusion  The risk of malignancy can be higher than it is commonly believed, and guidelines should be based on the data from the institutions themselves for a better assessment of the outcomes.

A comparative study of two liquid-based preparation methods: membrane-based and sedimentation in fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis in thyroid nodules

Background

As thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) shows a certain limitation in the diagnosis of conventional smears, novel approaches like liquid-based cytology (LBC) have been gradually applied recently. Studies have shown the difference between the conventional smears (CSs) and liquid-based smears on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) diagnosis, but the impacts of different liquid-based preparation (LBP) methods, including membrane-based and sedimentation, on diagnosis are still not clear. In this study, the effects of liquid-based smears prepared by different methods on the cytological interpretation were studied.

Methods

A total of 221 thyroid liquid-based FNAC cases from January 2017 to October 2018 were collected. We retrospectively studied and compared the effects of the membrane-based and sedimentation LBP methods through The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBS) diagnosis and risk of malignancy assessment. Besides, we made an evaluation on the diagnostic differences in the effects of different preparation methods on the cell morphology and tissue structure of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) for more accurate FNAC diagnosis.

Results

Among the 221 cases reviewed, membrane-based method was applied in 153 cases and sedimentation in 68 cases. According to the diagnostic criteria of 2017 TBS, TBSVI and TBSV thyroid could be cytologically diagnosed by membrane-based (49.0% (75/153) and 25.5% (39/153)) and sedimentation (52.9(36/68) and 25(17/68)) methods, and both were confirmed as PTC through histopathological diagnosis after operation, with the malignancy degree as high as 100%. In addition, of the 30 cases that were diagnosed as TBSIII thyroid nodules with the membrane-based method, 15 cases were pathologically malignant after an operation, with the malignancy degree of 50% (15/30), while that in 11 cases using the sedimentation method was 45.4% (5/11). PTC could be detected in both the TBSIV and TBSII thyroid nodules diagnosed by membrane-based method, with the sensitivity of 87.0% (114/131) lower than that by sedimentation method (91.4% (53/58)), showing the lower consistency with the histopathological result (K = 0.635 vs K = 0.757). Among the membrane-based smears, 23.5% (36/153) had fewer follicular epithelial cells, 55.6% (20/36) of which were considered to be suspicious for PTC from cell karyotype and tissue arrangement. While among the sedimentation smears, 16.2% (11/68) had fewer follicular epithelial cells, and 63.6% (7/11) was suspicious for PTC. In 72.5% (95/131) membrane-based smears of PTC, the papillary and swirling structures were not obvious, showing as crowded syncytial cell masses, while in 55.2% (32/58) sedimentation smears, both structures were visible with obvious three-dimensional papillary structure, and the fibrovascular axis still remained.

Conclusion

LBP technique is feasible for FNAC diagnosis, and the sedimentation shows more advantages, like higher PTC detection rate and good consistency with postoperative histopathological diagnosis. A clear understanding of the subtle differences in the effects of membrane-based and sedimentation methods on the cell morphology and tissue structure could be conducive to the definitive diagnosis of PTC before operation.

Malignancy risk for solitary and multiple nodules in Hürthle cell-predominant thyroid fine-needle aspirations: A multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

Hürthle cell metaplasia is common in hyperplastic nodules, particularly within the setting of lymphocytic thyroiditis (LT). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology indicates that it is acceptable to classify Hürthle cell-predominant fine-needle aspiration (HC FNA) specimens as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) rather than suspicious for a Hürthle cell neoplasm (HUR) within the setting of multiple nodules or known LT. The goal of the current study was to address whether this approach is justified.

METHODS

HC FNA specimens were identified and correlated with ultrasound and surgical pathology reports if available. Multinodularity was determined based on findings on macroscopic examination if imaging results were unavailable.

RESULTS

A total of 698 HC FNA specimens were identified, including 576 resected nodules, 455 of which (79%) were benign. The overall risk of malignancy for HUR was 27%, whereas the risk of malignancy for AUS was 10%. The mean size of the benign nodules was 2.1 cm on surgical resection specimens, with multiple nodules noted in 293 cases (64%) and histologic LT noted in 116 cases (25%). The mean size of the malignant nodules was 2.8 cm, with multiple nodules and histologic LT noted in 74 cases (61%) and 22 cases (18%), respectively. The malignancy rate did not differ between solitary or multiple nodules (P = .52) or in the presence or absence of LT (P = .12). However, size did significantly differ between malignant and benign nodules (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The malignancy rate did not differ significantly in the presence of multiple nodules or LT, although the latter demonstrated a statistical trend. A diagnosis of AUS over HUR based solely on the presence of multinodularity is not warranted.

Thyroid nodules with Hürthle cells: the malignancy risk in relation to the FNA outcome category

PURPOSE

The aim was to find whether the presence of Hürthle cells (HC) in a smear influences the categorization of FNA results or the risk of malignancy (RoM) of particular categories of cytological diagnosis.

METHODS

25,220 FNA performed in a single center in years 2005-2017 were analyzed. Almost all the examined patients were exposed to moderate iodine deficiency for most of their lives. The distribution of FNA outcome categories was compared between two groups: with or without HC (HC and non-HC). The RoM was evaluated on the basis of postoperative histopathological examination (3082 patients).

RESULTS

HC were found in 7.5% of diagnostic FNA. HC nodules were classified into categories II (78.2% vs. 91.9%, p < 0.0000) and VI (0.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.0017) less often than non-HC nodules, but more frequently to categories III (14.4% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.0000), IV (11.2% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.0000) and V (1.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.0013). There were no significant differences in RoM between HC and non-HC nodules. The RoM in HC and non-HC nodules of particular categories of the Bethesda system was as follows: II: 1.8% vs. 0.8%, III: 9.7% vs. 3.8% when only the last FNA was considered and 10.8% vs. 6.4% when the category III in any performed FNA was considered; IV: 12.7% vs. 10.9%; V: 41.7% vs. 58.2%; and VI: 100% vs. 96.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

HC nodules are classified into categories of equivocal cytological outcomes more often than nodules without HC. Nevertheless, the presence of HC in a smear does not significantly affect the RoM of FNA categories.

Risk of malignancy in Thyroid "Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance" and its subcategories - A 5-year experience

Context

Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS] is a heterogeneous category with a wide range of risk of malignancy [ROM] reported in the literature. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [TBSRTC], 2017 has recommended subcategorization of AUS/FLUS.

Aims

To evaluate the ROM in thyroid nodules categorized as AUS/FLUS, as well as separate ROM for each of the five subcategories.

Settings and Design

Retrospective analytic study.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective audit was conducted for all thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from January 2013 to December 2017. Slides for cases with follow-up histopathology were reviewed, classified into the five recommended subcategories, and differential ROM was calculated.

Statistical Analysis Used

z test for comparison of proportions was done to evaluate the difference in ROM among different subcategories of AUS/FLUS. The P value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

Total number of thyroid FNACs reported was 1,630, of which 122 were AUS/FLUS (7.5%). Histopathology was available in 49 cases, out of which 18 were malignant (ROM = 36.7%). The risk of malignancy (ROM) for nodules with architectural and cytologic atypia was higher (43.8%) than ROM for nodules with only architectural atypia (16.7%).

Conclusions

The sub-classification of AUS/FLUS into subcategories as recommended by TBSRTC, 2017 may better stratify the malignancy risk and guide future management guidelines.

Subcategorisation of AUS/FLUS thyroid lesions as per the 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a retrospective study from a tertiary care centre analysing risk of malignancy (ROM) of the different subcategories

Aims

The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) recommends subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) into six subcategories. The present study evaluates the risk of malignancy (ROM) and risk of neoplasm (RON) among these.

Methods

All thyroid aspirates reported as AUS/FLUS over a 4.5-year period, with available histology, were reviewed and subclassified as per TBSRTC. ROM and RON were calculated and compared.

Results

Of 2554 thyroid aspirates, 281 (11.0%) were AUS/FLUS. Eighty-one with available histology were evaluated. ROM was 51.8%. Cytologic and architectural atypia (AUS-C&A) was the most prevalent (62.9%), followed by Hürthle cell type (19.6%), AUS-A (11.1%), AUS-not otherwise specified (NOS) (7.4%), cytologic atypia (AUS-C) (4.9%) and atypical lymphoid cells (1.2%). Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and adenomatous goitre (AG) were the most common histological diagnoses (27% each). On histology, AUS-C had 2/4 PTC and 2/4 AG on histology. AUS-A had 4/9 follicular neoplasm (FN) and 2/9 non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) while AUS C&A had 18/51 PTC, 13/51 AG, 11/51 NIFTP and 5/51 FN. ROM and RON were similar across subcategories, ROM was the highest for AUS-C&A (58.8%), AUS-C (50%) and AUS-NOS (50%). NIFTP reclassification as non-malignant reduced ROM to 35.8% (absolute reduction of 16% and a relative decrease of 31%) with the greatest relative decrease seen in AUS-A (50%), followed by AUS-C&A (37%), and none in others.

Conclusions

AUS/FLUS subcategorisation helped to indicate risk for the more likely neoplasm, whether PTC or FN. ROM was the highest for cases with cytological atypia but did not differ significantly across different subcategories. NIFTP changed the ROM of AUS-A and AUS-C&A, since both NIFTP and FN have microfollicles.

Indeterminate thyroid nodules (TIR3A/TIR3B) according to the new Italian reporting system for thyroid cytology: A cytomorphological study

OBJECTIVE

The Italian reporting system for thyroid cytology classifies indeterminate lesions as TIR3A (low risk) or TIR3B (high risk) and is meant to provide practical guidance rather than a detailed consideration of morphological features. We aimed to assess which cytological features have the most diagnostic value and whether they are effective in classifying nodules as either TIR3A or TIR3B and in predicting histological outcomes.

METHODS

Thyroid fine-needle aspirates from 111 indeterminate nodules were reviewed blinded to clinical information, TIR3A/TIR3B classification, and histology in order to assess which cytological features (pooled into artefacts, smear background, architectural and nuclear atypia, and oncocytes) differentiate TIR3A from TIR3B, and benign from malignant histological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the cytological features examined, those specific for TIR3B included high cellularity, nuclear atypia, oncocyte predominance and transgressing vessels. Features specific for TIR3A included artefacts, low cellularity and oncocyte sparseness. Other features, such as microfollicules/trabeculae, were non-specific. Due to the different distributions of these features, three TIR3B subgroups were identifiable: follicular lesions with oncocytic changes, pure follicular lesions, and follicular lesions with nuclear atypia, whereas no subgroups were identifiable in TIR3A. Nuclear atypia was a significant indicator of malignancy, whereas oncocyte predominance was not a reliable predictor of malignancy. High cellularity and microfollicules/trabeculae were not indicative of any histological outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the assessed features were good predictors of histological outcomes. The TIR3A category included undefined nodules due to the absence of characterising features, whereas the TIR3B category included nodules with a greater number of distinguishing features.

Cytomorphologic, Imaging, Molecular Findings, and Outcome in Thyroid Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance/Atypical Cell of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS): A Mini-Review

OBJECTIVES

Since the introduction of the entity of "Atypical cell of undetermined significance /follicular lesion of undetermined significance" (AUS/FLUS) by The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) in 2007, there have been many published studies about the cytomorphologic criteria, subclassification, outcome, and management of patients with the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. There have been many studies in different aspects of this indeterminate category, i.e., cytologic and molecular findings, ultrasonographic findings, and in some instances even core-needle biopsy to address a better and safer way of the management of patients with this fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis. The second edition of TBSRTC and the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines provide an update on the follow-up and management of AUS/FLUS. A multidisciplinary team consisting of pathologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, and radiologists should be involved in the diagnosis and management of AUS/FLUS, and all of them should be aware of the heterogeneity of this lesion for the prediction of the treatment and outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

In this review, we consider different research platforms (2008-2017) to find the best and key reports for the above-mentioned challenging aspects of AUS/FLUS.

CONCLUSION

AUS/FLUS is now a well-defined group of thyroid lesions, which can be most accurately diagnosed and managed with cytomorphology, molecular, and ancillary studies.

The Usefulness of Immunocytochemistry of CD56 in Determining Malignancy from Indeterminate Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology serves as a safe, economical tool in evaluating thyroid nodules. However, about 30% of the samples are categorized as indeterminate. Hence, many immunocytochemistry markers have been studied, but there has not been a single outstanding marker. We studied the efficacy of CD56 with human bone marrow endothelial cell marker-1 (HBME-1) in diagnosis in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) category III.

METHODS

We reviewed ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples with Papanicolaou stain from July 1 to December 31, 2016 (2,195 cases) and selected TBSRTC category III cases (n = 363). Twenty-six cases were histologically confirmed as benign (six cases, 23%) or malignant (20 cases, 77%); we stained 26 LBC slides with HBME-1 and CD56 through the cell transfer method. For evaluation of reactivity of immunocytochemistry, we chose atypical follicular cell clusters.

RESULTS

CD56 was not reactive in 18 of 20 cases (90%) of malignant nodules and showed cytoplasmic positivity in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. CD56 showed high sensitivity (90.0%) and relatively low specificity (83.3%) in detecting malignancy (p = .004). HBME-1 was reactive in 17 of 20 cases (85%) of malignant nodules and was not reactive in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. HBME-1 showed slightly lower sensitivity (85.0%) than CD56. The specificity in detecting malignancy by HBME-1 was similar to that of CD56 (83.3%, p = .008). CD56 and HBME-1 tests combined showed lower sensitivity (75.0% vs 90%) and higher specificity (93.8% vs 83.3%) in detecting malignancy compared to using CD56 alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CD56 alone showed relatively low specificity despite high sensitivity for detecting malignancy. Combining CD56 with HBME-1 could increase the specificity. Thus, we suggest that CD56 could be a useful preoperative marker for differential diagnosis of TBSRTC category III samples.

Both Ultrasound Features and Nuclear Atypia are Associated with Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of thyroid nodules that undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with findings of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is unclear. Categorizing nodules by AUS subtype and ultrasound characteristics may improve risk stratification. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between AUS subtype and ultrasound features on risk of malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

We performed a review of all patients with a thyroid nodule who underwent an FNA at our institution between January 2010 and November 2015. Patients with AUS were divided into groups with (1) nuclear atypia, (2) architectural atypia, or (3) Hurthle cell atypia. Their ultrasound features were assessed using the American Thyroid Association (ATA) thyroid nodule sonographic patterns. We conducted a univariate and multivariable analysis to determine the association between AUS subtype and other variables of interest with ROM.

RESULTS

Of the 3428 thyroid nodules that underwent FNA, 237 (6.9%) had AUS. Of the 97 surgically resected nodules, 67 (69%) were benign and 30 (31%) were malignant. On univariate analysis nuclear atypia (p < 0.01) was associated with a thyroid malignancy. On multivariable analysis, both ATA high-risk ultrasound features (p = 0.04, odds ratio [OR] 3.68) and nuclear atypia (p < 0.01, OR 11.8) were independently associated with a final diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Nuclear atypia and ATA high-risk ultrasound features are useful in identifying patients with AUS that are at a higher risk of thyroid malignancy. Surgeons should take these factors into consideration when evaluating patients with AUS.

Prevalence and associated malignancy of Bethesda category III cytologies of thyroid nodules assigned to the "cytological atypia" or "architectural atypia" groups

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the prevalence of Bethesda category III cytologies and their malignancy rate, and to analyze differences in the second cytology, malignancy rate, type of carcinoma, and TNM stage between the cytological atypia (CA) and architectural atypia (AA) groups.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A retrospective study of 973 biopsies. Bethesda category III cytologies were classified as CA when nuclear atypia was seen but they were not diagnostic or suspicious of malignancy, and as AA when smears had few cells but had a predominantly microfollicular pattern and minimal or absent colloid. The cytological and pathological results were correlated.

RESULTS

There were 87 (8.9%) Bethesda category III cytologies (34 CC, 53 AA). Second cytologies were performed in 23 patients (16 with CA, 7 with AA), and a benign result was found in 68.7% of CA and 71.4% of the AA group. Sixty-four patients (23 CA, 41 AA) underwent surgery and 15 of these (23.4%) had a malignant disease: 39.1% CA vs 14.6% AA (P=.029). There was a false negative result in the CA group. The follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma was the most common malignancy (60%). There were no differences in type of carcinoma or TNM stage between CA and AA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported prevalence of Bethesda category III cytologies was as expected. The malignancy rate was significantly higher in the CA group, but there were no differences in the result of the second cytology, type of carcinoma found, or TNM stage. The division of Bethesda category III cytologies is useful to provide a better stratification of the risk of malignancy.

Evaluation of the Italian cytological subclassification of thyroid indeterminate nodules into TIR-3A and TIR-3B: a retrospective study of 290 cases with histological correlation from a single institution

PURPOSE

The Italian consensus to classify thyroid cytology has provided a standardized reporting scheme, including the subdivision of indeterminate for malignancy TIR-3 category into TIR-3A (low-risk) and TIR-3B (high-risk). We aimed to present our experience on this subclassification by evaluating risks of malignancy and the validity in sorting nodules with dissimilar risks. Another aim was to compare our performance against the Bethesda system.

METHODS

Fine-needle aspirates of 290 TIR-3 that underwent thyroid surgery at our hospital (2008-2013) were reviewed and divided into TIR-3A or TIR-3B, and AUS/FLUS or FN/SFN. Cytological diagnoses were then correlated to histology. Results were evaluated using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The subclassification into TIR-3A and TIR-3B differentiated hyperplastic nodules (p = 0.000) but not adenomas (p = 0.090). Rates of malignancy were significantly different between TIR-3A (10.2%) and TIR-3B (43.8%); TIR-3B malignancies were often papillary carcinomas (83%). TIR-3A/TIR-3B accounted for high sensitivity (84.5%; CI 79.7-88.4%), accuracy (64.1%; CI 58.6-69.6%) and NPV (89.8%; CI 85.6-93.0%) as opposed to modest specificity (55.8%; CI 49.9-61.6%) and PPV (43.8%; CI 38.1-49.8%). The rate of malignancy in AUS-FLUS was higher than in TIR-3A (p = 0.007), whereas it was not different between FN/SFN and TIR-3B (p = 0.337). Sensitivity of the Bethesda system was significantly lower respect to the Italian system.

CONCLUSIONS

The study supports the Italian consensus showing a different risk of malignancy for TIR-3A as compared to TIR-3B. TIR-3A/TIR-3B subclassification is valid to sort out benign nodules (high NPV) and malignancies (high sensitivity) but not adenomas (modest specificity, low PPV). In our experience, sensitivity is the main difference between Italian and Bethesda systems.

Subclassification of Bethesda Atypical and Follicular Neoplasm Categories According to Nuclear and Architectural Atypia Improves Discrimination of Thyroid Malignancy Risk

BACKGROUND

Although The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has provided clinicians with a standardized classification scheme for the diagnosis of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens, the indeterminate categories of Bethesda III (B3)-atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS)-and Bethesda IV (B4)-follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN)-continue to pose challenges with regards to ideal diagnostic and therapeutic management. Having previously demonstrated the presence of nuclear atypia as a high-risk subgroup in B3, the objective of this study was to evaluate the malignancy rates in the B4 subgroup with nuclear atypia.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all thyroid FNACs diagnosed as B4 (FN/SFN) between 2008 and 2015 was conducted at a tertiary referral center in Singapore. Data on patient demographics, sonographic features, and final histological diagnosis were collected. This was compared to data from a previous analysis on all nodules diagnosed as B3 (AUS/FLUS) over a similar period.

RESULTS

A total of 137/309 (44.3%) and 88/111 (79.3%) FNACs diagnosed as B3 and B4, respectively, underwent surgical excision yielding final histopathological diagnoses. The malignancy rate of B4 was 31/88 (35.2%) compared to B3, which was 37/137 (27.0%). Subclassification based on the presence of architectural versus nuclear atypia showed significantly higher malignancy rates in B4 nodules with nuclear atypia (21.8% vs. 57.6%; p < 0.01). These findings corroborate previous results within the B3 category (malignancy rate of 14.7% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.01). The only sonographic features predictive of malignancy were the presence of macrocalcifications in B4 compared to irregularity of margins in B3.

CONCLUSION

The presence of nuclear atypia identifies subgroups with significant differential malignancy risks within both the B3 and B4 categories. This supports the notion that subclassification is a useful risk stratification tool that can guide diagnostic and therapeutic management of indeterminate thyroid nodules with heterogenous risk profiles.

The impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the rate of malignancy for atypia of undetermined significance subcategories

BACKGROUND

The recent revision in terminology, with noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) replacing noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma, has reclassified the clinically indolent tumor as nonmalignant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this change on the rate of malignancy (ROM) for subcategories of an atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology.

METHODS

Consecutive thyroid FNAs interpreted as AUS over a period of 4 years were retrospectively analyzed. The ROM for AUS subcategories, including atypia of undetermined significance with nuclear atypia (AUS-N), atypia of undetermined significance with a microfollicular pattern (AUS-F), atypia of undetermined significance with nuclear atypia and a microfollicular pattern (AUS-N/F), atypia of undetermined significance with Hürthle cells (AUS-H), and atypia of undetermined significance, not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS), were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 426 nodules interpreted as AUS, 244 were surgically excised. The incidence of NIFTP in each subcategory was as follows: 18% for AUS-N, 18% for AUS-F, 9% for AUS-N/F, 3% for AUS-H, and 0% for AUS-NOS. After the reclassification of NIFTP as nonmalignant, the ROM based on histologic follow-up significantly decreased from 43% to 26% for AUS-N (P < .001) and from 29% to 10% for AUS-F (P = .008). The ROM for AUS-N remained significantly higher than the ROM for AUS-F (P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of resected AUS nodules can be reclassified as NIFTP, and that significantly decreases the ROM, especially for AUS-N and AUS-F. Nonetheless, AUS-N still harbors a substantially higher ROM than AUS-F. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:309-16. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Malignancy Rates of Thyroid Cytology: Cyst Fluid Benign or Non-Diagnostic?

Background

We sought to investigate subgroup distribution using Bethesda classification and risks for malignancy. We also compared the malignancy risk of cases that were denoted as non-diagnostic due to cystic contents, with cases that were denoted as non-diagnostic due to presence of other features.

Material/Methods

The study included pathology test results of 1,440 thyroid nodule samples diagnosed using Bethesda classification. Results of 305 thyroidectomy excision specimens from these patients were also compared with cytology results to determine the frequency of malignancy. The non-diagnostic group was divided into two categories: those with cystic contents, and others. Malignancy rates were separately calculated for the two groups, and compared with the other classification groups.

Results

Distribution of malignancy rates by Bethesda classification were as follows: non-diagnostic 12.5% (6/48), benign 1.5% (3/198), atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AFLUS) 9% (1/11), suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN) 37.5% (3/8), suspicious malignancy 70% (8/26), malignancy 100% (14/14).

Conclusions

Despite the limited number of cases, our study concluded that cystic content was closer to the benign category than the non-diagnostic category if the assessment was based on malignancy rates. In this group, similar to aspirations containing plenty of lymphocytes that indicates colloid or lymphocytic thyroiditis, it is still controversial whether criterion for adequacy of follicular epithelial cells should be sought, or if they should be regarded as benign in order to prevent unnecessarily performance of repeat aspirations.

Thyroid nodules classified as atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance deserve further research: Analysis of 305 surgically confirmed nodules

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to determine the malignancy risk for nodules categorised as atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and to investigate the predictors of malignancy.

METHODS

All nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNAs) performed between January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, ultrasonographic features, follow-up data and the final pathological results were recorded. After further exclusion, only nodules that underwent surgical excision were included in the final analysis. The malignancy rate and the range of malignancy rates were calculated. Clinical and ultrasound features were examined to determine the predictors of malignancy.

RESULTS

During the study period, FNA was performed on 9938 nodules, and 1019 (10.2%) nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. After further exclusion, 976 nodules were evaluated. After the initial diagnosis of AUS/FLUS, 139 (14.2%) patients underwent surgery, 518 (53.1%) had repeated FNAs. A total of 305 (31%) had undergone surgical excision at different time points. For surgically confirmed nodules, the malignancy rate after the initial FNA was 34.5% (the lower and upper thresholds for the malignancy rate were 19.3% and 66.3%, respectively), and 37.9% after the repeated FNA. No ultrasound feature was determined as a predictor, whereas age (>55 years) was a predictor for malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall malignancy rate for nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS and the malignancy rate for nodules that underwent repeated FNA after AUS/FLUS were higher than the expected malignancy rates of the National Cancer Institute. It is, therefore, suggested that the current recommendations should be reconsidered.