Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NOS and leg type: Clinical, morphologic and prognostic differences

Panel Sequencing of Primary Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphoma

Background: Primary cutaneous follicular B-cell lymphoma (PCFBCL) represents an indolent subtype of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, being clinically characterized by slowly growing tumors of the skin and common cutaneous relapses, while only exhibiting a low propensity for systemic dissemination or fatal outcome. Up to now, only few studies have investigated underlying molecular alterations of PCFBCL with respect to somatic mutations. Objectives: Our aim was to gain deeper insight into the pathogenesis of PCFBCL and to delineate discriminatory molecular features of this lymphoma subtype. Methods: We performed hybridization-based panel sequencing of 40 lymphoma-associated genes of 10 cases of well-characterized PCFBCL. In addition, we included two further ambiguous cases of atypical B-cell-rich lymphoid infiltrate/B-cell lymphoma of the skin for which definite subtype attribution had not been possible by routine investigations. Results: In 10 out of 12 analyzed cases, we identified genetic alterations within 15 of the selected 40 target genes. The most frequently detected alterations in PCFBCL affected the TNFRSF14, CREBBP, STAT6 and TP53 genes. Our analysis unrevealed novel mutations of the BCL2 gene in PCFBCL. All patients exhibited an indolent clinical course. Both the included arbitrary cases of atypical B-cell-rich cutaneous infiltrates showed somatic mutations within the FAS gene. As these mutations have previously been designated as subtype-specific recurrent alterations in primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL), we finally favored the diagnosis of PCMZL in these two cases based on these molecular findings. Conclusions: To conclude, our molecular data support that PCFBCL shows distinct somatic mutations which may aid to differentiate PCFBCL from pseudo-lymphoma as well as from other indolent and aggressive cutaneous B-cell lymphomas. While the detected genetic alterations of PCFBCL did not turn out to harbor any prognostic value in our cohort, our molecular data may add adjunctive discriminatory features for diagnostic purposes on a molecular level.

Cell-of-origin classification using the Hans and Lymph2Cx algorithms in primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas

Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL-LT) and primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma with a diffuse population of large cells (PCFCL-LC) are both primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas with large-cell morphology (CLBCL) but with different clinical characteristics and behavior. In systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS), gene-expression profiling (GEP) revealed two molecular subgroups based on their cell-of-origin (COO) with prognostic significance: the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype and the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype. This study investigated whether COO classification is a useful tool for classification of CLBCL. For this retrospective study, 51 patients with PCDLBCL-LT and 15 patients with PCFCL-LC were analyzed for their COO according to the immunohistochemistry-based Hans algorithm and the NanoString GEP-based Lymph2Cx algorithm. In PCFCL-LC, all cases (100%) classified as GCB by both Hans and Lymph2Cx. In contrast, COO classification in PCDLBCL-LT was heterogeneous. Using Hans, 75% of the PCDLBCL-LT patients classified as non-GCB and 25% as GCB, while Lymph2Cx classified only 18% as ABC, 43% as unclassified/intermediate, and 39% as GCB. These COO subgroups did not differ in the expression of BCL2 and IgM, mutations in MYD88 and/or CD79B, loss of CDKN2A, or survival. In conclusion, PCFCL-LC uniformly classified as GCB, while PCDLBCL-LT classified along the COO spectrum of DLBCL-NOS using the Hans and Lymph2Cx algorithms. In contrast to DLBCL-NOS, the clinical relevance of COO classification in CLBCL using these algorithms has limitations and cannot be used as an alternative for the current multiparameter approach in differentiation of PCDLBCL-LT and PCFCL-LC.

Cutaneous involvement in diffuse large B cell lymphoma at presentation: report of two rare cases and literature review

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can occur at nodal and/or extra-nodal sites. After the gastrointestinal tract, cutaneous involvement predominates in extra-nodal DLBCL. Skin involvement at presentation can be in the form of plaques, papules, nodules or ulcers. Differentiating primary cutaneous DLBCL from systemic DLBCL with cutaneous involvement is important for appropriate patient management.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe here, two interesting cases of skin involvement in DLBCL- one primary cutaneous DLBCL and the other, cutaneous involvement in systemic DLBCL with different clinico-pathological profiles. Though both cases had almost similar morphology of the skin lesions (ulcero-proliferative) at presentation, the disease was confined to the skin in the former, while the latter had involvement of lymph nodes and bone marrow.

CONCLUSIONS

Meticulous clinical evaluation, appropriate histopathological and immunohistochemical workup helped in their diagnosis and correct classification of the disease status, guiding the further treatment decisions.

Large B - Cell Lymphoma of the Leg - Unfavourable Course with Rituximab/Bendamustin

BACKGROUND:

Cutaneous B-cell lymphomas represent about 25% of all cutaneous lymphomas. Peripheral diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the leg type is the most aggressive subtype seen mainly in elderly patients. Treatment is not standardised.

CASE REPORT:

An 87-year-old female patient was presented in May 2018 because of the development of painless subcutaneous nodules on the legs since late 2017. On examination, we observed up to 5 cm large erythematous nodules on the legs and a smaller plaque in the left submammary fold. The histology of a skin demonstrated tumour infiltrate that was separated from the overlying epidermis by a grenz zone. It consisted of densely packed, blastoid lymphocytic cells with numerous, and some atypical mitoses. The cells were positive for CD20, CD79A and CD5. Almost 100% of the cells were labelled with Ki67. The diagnosis of a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCLBCL-LT) of the leg was confirmed. Histologic analysis of a bone marrow biopsy demonstrated a hypercellular bone marrow without malignant lymphatic infiltrates. Diagnostic ultrasound of cervical nodes and computerised tomography (CT) scans (native and with contrast medium) of head, neck and trunk excluded an extracutaneous manifestation of the PCLBCL-LT. Treatment with rituximab plus bendamustibe was initiated, but tumour progress was noted after the second course. Suggested palliative therapy with radiation and rituximab was refused. The patient died 7 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although some trials suggested a beneficial effect of immuno-chemotherapy, the prognosis of (PCLBCL-LT) remains poor. Standardised treatment is missing due to the relative rarity of this malignancy.