Clinical impact of surveillance colonoscopy using magnification without diminutive polyp removal

Impact of Surveillance Colonoscopy Timing on Colorectal Cancer Incidence After Advanced Adenoma Resection

INTRODUCTION

Index colonoscopy findings can affect surveillance decisions that have an impact on the future risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy in reducing CRC risk remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the timing of the first surveillance colonoscopy affected CRC incidence rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at 2 community endoscopy clinics between 2005 and 2021, including 20,397 individuals. Based on the findings at index colonoscopy, we categorized into 4 groups: advanced adenoma (AA), ≥3 non-AAs, 1-2 non-AAs, and no adenoma. We compared the cumulative incidence of CRC among these groups, focusing on whether the first surveillance interval was less than or greater than 3 years after index colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Index colonoscopy findings identified 11,601 subjects with no adenoma, 5,288 with 1-2 non-AA, 1,484 with ≥3 non-AA, and 2,024 with AA. There were 50 cases of CRC: 23 in the no adenoma, 10 in the 1-2 non-AA, 6 in the ≥3 non-AA, and 11 in the AA group. First surveillance after 3 years was associated with a higher incidence of subsequent CRC in the AA group (hazard ratio 3.49, 95% confidence interval 1.06-11.46, P = 0.04).

DISCUSSION

In the AA group, surveillance colonoscopy within 3 years was associated with a lower risk of CRC. These findings suggest that a first surveillance within 3 years is particularly effective in subjects with AA.

Efficiency of Real-time Computer-aided Polyp Detection during Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Pilot Study

Objectives

Studies have suggested that computer-aided polyp detection using artificial intelligence improves adenoma identification during colonoscopy. However, its real-world effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the usefulness of computer-aided detection during regular surveillance colonoscopy.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy with computer-aided detection between January and March 2023 and had undergone colonoscopy at least twice during the past 3 years were recruited. The clinicopathological findings of lesions identified using computer-aided detection were evaluated. The detection ability was sub-analyzed based on the expertise of the endoscopist and the presence of diminutive adenomas (size ≤5 mm).

Results

A total of 78 patients were included. Computer-aided detection identified 46 adenomas in 28 patients; however, no carcinomas were identified. The mean withdrawal time was 824 ± 353 s, and the mean tumor diameter was 3.3 mm (range, 2-8 mm). The most common gross type was 0-Is (70%), followed by 0-Isp (17%) and 0-IIa (13%). The most common tumor locations were the ascending colon and sigmoid colon (28%), followed by the transverse colon (26%), cecum (7%), descending colon (7%), and rectum (4%). Overall, 34.1% and 38.2% of patients with untreated diminutive adenomas and those with no adenomas, respectively, had newly detected adenomas. Endoscopist expertise did not affect the results.

Conclusions

Computer-aided detection may help identify adenomas during surveillance colonoscopy for patients with untreated diminutive adenomas and those with a history of endoscopic resection.

Characteristics and Prognosis of Sporadic Neoplasias Detected in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) develop not only UC-associated neoplasias but also sporadic neoplasias (SNs). However, few studies have described the characteristics of SNs in patients with UC. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and prognosis of SNs in patients with UC.

METHODS

A total of 141 SNs in 59 patients with UC, detected by surveillance colonoscopy at Hiroshima University Hospital between January 1999 and December 2021, were included. SNs were diagnosed based on their location, endoscopic features, and histopathologic findings along with immunohistochemical staining for Ki67 and p53.

RESULTS

Of the SNs, 91.5% were diagnosed as adenoma and 8.5% were diagnosed as carcinoma (Tis carcinoma, 3.5%; T1 carcinoma, 5.0%). 61.0% of the SNs were located in the right colon, 31.2% were located in the left colon, and 7.8% were located in the rectum. When classified based on the site of the lesion, 70.9% of SNs occurred outside and 29.1% within the affected area. Of all SNs included, 95.7% were endoscopically resected and 4.3% were surgically resected. Among the 59 patients included, synchronous SNs occurred in 23.7% and metachronous multiple SNs occurred in 40.7% during surveillance. The 5-year cumulative incidence of metachronous multiple SNs was higher in patients with synchronous multiple SNs (54.2%) than in those without synchronous multiple SNs (46.4%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with UC with synchronous multiple SNs are at a higher risk of developing metachronous multiple SNs and may require a closer follow-up by total colonoscopy than patients without synchronous SNs.

Usefulness and Educational Benefit of a Virtual Scale Endoscope in Measuring Colorectal Polyp Size

INTRODUCTION

The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) is a newly introduced endoscope that helps endoscopists in measuring colorectal polyp size (CPS) during colonoscopy by displaying a virtual scale. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of the VSE for CPS measurement and the educational benefit of using VSE images to improve CPS estimation accuracy.

METHODS

This study included 42 colorectal polyps in 26 patients treated at Hiroshima University Hospital. In study 1, CPS measured using a VSE before endoscopic mucosal resection was compared with CPS measured on resected specimens, and the agreement between the two measurement methods was evaluated via Bland-Altman analysis. In study 2, 14 endoscopists (5 beginners, 5 intermediates, and 4 experts) took a pre-test to determine the size of 42 polyps. After the pre-test, a lecture on CPS measurement using VSE images was given. One month later, the endoscopists took a post-test to compare CPS accuracy before and after the lecture.

RESULTS

In study 1, Bland-Altman analysis revealed no fixed or proportional errors. The mean bias ±95% limits of agreement (±1.96 standard deviations) of the measurement error was -0.05 ± 0.21 mm, indicating that the agreement between two measurement methods was sufficient. In study 2, the accuracy of CPS measurement was significantly higher among beginners (59.5% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.01) and intermediates (65.2% vs. 44.3%, p < 0.05) in the post-test than in the pre-test.

CONCLUSION

The VSE accurately measures CPS before resection, and its images are useful teaching tools for beginner and intermediate endoscopists.

Complete endoscopic removal rate of detected colorectal polyps in a real world out-patient practical setting

OBJECTIVES

Colonoscopy with adenomatous polypectomy reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. We introduced a strategy of removing all neoplastic polyps in single-session out-patient colonoscopy using cold polypectomy. We aimed to investigate the achievement of single-session complete removal rate of detected colorectal polyps in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included colonoscopy-scheduled 40-79-year-old outpatients, with at least one colorectal neoplasm, between January 2015 and December 2016. Exclusion criteria were: colorectal neoplasms 21 mm or larger in size; pre-examination for colorectal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection; colonoscopy performed by health check program; ongoing antithrombotic treatment; inflammatory bowel disease; familial adenomatous polyposis. We defined 'clean colon' as the removal of all detected neoplastic polyps in a single-session colonoscopy. We evaluated clean colon rate, factors relating to clean colon failure and complications.

RESULTS

We evaluated 2527 patients (mean age 68 years; 799 women) with 8203 colorectal polyps (7675 adenomas, 423 serrated lesions, 105 Tis and T1 cancers). In 1-4 mm polyps, cold snare polypectomy (CSP; 51.8%) and cold forceps polypectomy (CFP; 45.8%) were applied. Clean colon rates were 95.1% per patient and 97.1% per lesion. The significant factors denoting clean colon failure were inadequate bowel preparation, ≥5 lesions, and the most advanced estimated histology of adenocarcinoma, on multivariate analyses. Post-polypectomy bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis occurred in five patients (0.2%) who had undergone endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or hot snare polypectomy (HSP). Perforation occurred in one patient (0.04%) with EMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The clean colon rates were satisfactory in single-session out-patient colonoscopy using cold polypectomy.

Definition of competence standards for optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

BACKGROUND : The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has developed a core curriculum for high quality optical diagnosis training for practice across Europe. The development of easy-to-measure competence standards for optical diagnosis can optimize clinical decision-making in endoscopy. This manuscript represents an official Position Statement of the ESGE aiming to define simple, safe, and easy-to-measure competence standards for endoscopists and artificial intelligence systems performing optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps (1 - 5 mm). METHODS : A panel of European experts in optical diagnosis participated in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on Simple Optical Diagnosis Accuracy (SODA) competence standards for implementation of the optical diagnosis strategy for diminutive colorectal polyps. In order to assess the clinical benefits and harms of implementing optical diagnosis with different competence standards, a systematic literature search was performed. This was complemented with the results from a recently performed simulation study that provides guidance for setting alternative competence standards for optical diagnosis. Proposed competence standards were based on literature search and simulation study results. Competence standards were accepted if at least 80 % agreement was reached after a maximum of three voting rounds. RECOMMENDATION 1:  In order to implement the leave-in-situ strategy for diminutive colorectal lesions (1-5 mm), it is clinically acceptable if, during real-time colonoscopy, at least 90 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity is achieved for high confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia of 1-5 mm in the rectosigmoid. Histopathology is used as the gold standard.Level of agreement 95 %. RECOMMENDATION 2:  In order to implement the resect-and-discard strategy for diminutive colorectal lesions (1-5 mm), it is clinically acceptable if, during real-time colonoscopy, at least 80 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity is achieved for high confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia of 1-5 mm. Histopathology is used as the gold standard.Level of agreement 100 %. CONCLUSION : The developed SODA competence standards define diagnostic performance thresholds in relation to clinical consequences, for training and for use when auditing the optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Clinical Features and Genomic Characterization of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Some colorectal cancers (CRCs) may be missed during colonoscopies. We aimed to determine the clinicopathological, biological, and genomic characteristics of post-colonoscopy CRCs (PCCRCs).

METHODS

Of the 1,619 consecutive patients with 1,765 CRCs detected between 2008 and 2016, 63 patients with 67 PCCRCs, when colonoscopies were performed 6-60 months before diagnosis, were recruited. After excluding patients with inflammatory bowel disease, familial polyposis syndrome, CRCs that developed from diminutive adenomatous polyps, and recurrent CRCs after endoscopic resection, 32 patients with 34 PCCRCs were enrolled. The lesions' clinicopathological features, mismatch repair proteins (MMRs), and genomic alterations were investigated.

RESULTS

The overall PCCRC-5y rate, rate of intramucosal (Tis) lesions, and rate of T1 or more deeply invasive cancers were 3.7% (66/1,764), 3.9% (32/820), and 3.6% (34/944), respectively. Thirty-three patients' MMRs were investigated; 7 (21%) exhibited deficient MMRs (dMMRs), comprising 4 with T2 or more deeply invasive cancers and 5 whose lesions were in the proximal colon. Twenty-three tumors' genomic mutations were investigated; PIK3CA had mutated in 5 of 6 T2 or more deeply invasive cancers, of which, 4 were located in the proximal colon. Two patients with dMMRs and BRAF mutations had poor prognoses. Sixty-one percent (17/28) of the macroscopic type 0 lesions were superficial. All superficial Tis and T1 PCCRCs were detected <24 months after the negative colonoscopies. They were distributed throughout the colon and rectum.

DISCUSSION

PCCRCs may be invasive cancers in the proximal colon that exhibit dMMRs and/or PIK3CA mutations or missed early CRCs especially superficial lesions.

Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines

The Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines were developed by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society as basic guidelines based on the scientific methods. The importance of endoscopic screening and surveillance for both detection and post-treatment follow-up of colorectal cancer has been recognized as essential to reduce disease mortality. There is limited high-level evidence in this field; therefore, we had to focus on the consensus of experts. These clinical practice guidelines consist of 20 clinical questions and eight background knowledge topics that have been determined as the current guiding principles.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE) published ''Daicho Polyp Shinryo Guideline 2014'' in Japanese and a part of this guideline was published in English as "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps" in the Journal of Gastroenterology in 2015. A revised version of the Japanese-language guideline was published in 2020, and here we introduce a part of the contents of revised version.

METHODS

The guideline committee discussed and drew up a series of clinical questions (CQs). Recommendation statements for the CQs were limited to items with multiple therapeutic options. Items with established conclusions that had 100% agreement with previous guidelines (background questions) and items with no (or old) evidence that are topics for future research (future research questions: FRQs) were given descriptions only. To address the CQs and FRQs, PubMed, ICHUSHI, and other sources were searched for relevant articles published in English from 1983 to October 2018 and articles published in Japanese from 1983 to November 2018. The Japan Medical Library Association was also commissioned to search for relevant materials. Manual searches were performed for questions with insufficient online references.

RESULTS

The professional committee created 18 CQs and statements concerning the current concept and diagnosis/treatment of various colorectal polyps, including their epidemiology, screening, pathophysiology, definition and classification, diagnosis, management, practical treatment, complications, and surveillance after treatment, and other colorectal lesions (submucosal tumors, nonneoplastic polyps, polyposis, hereditary tumors, ulcerative colitis-associated tumors/carcinomas).

CONCLUSIONS

After evaluation by the moderators, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps were proposed for 2020. This report addresses the therapeutic related CQs introduced when formulating these guidelines.

Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies

Risk stratification by index colonoscopy is well established for first surveillance endoscopy, but whether the previous two colonoscopies affect the subsequent advanced neoplasias has not been established. Therefore, the subsequent risk based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies were investigated. This retrospective, cohort study was conducted in two clinics and included participants who had undergone two or more colonoscopies after index colonoscopy. High-risk was defined as advanced adenoma (≥ 1 cm, or tubulovillous or villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia). Based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies, patients were classified into four categories: category A (both colonoscopy findings were normal), category B (no high-risk findings both times), category C (one time high-risk finding), and category D (high-risk findings both times). The incidence of subsequent advanced neoplasia was examined in each category. A total of 13,426 subjects were included and surveyed during the study periods. The subjects in category D had the highest risk of advanced neoplasia (27.4%, n = 32/117). The subjects in category A had the lowest risk (4.0%, n = 225/5,583). The hazard ratio for advanced neoplasia of category D compared to category A was 9.90 (95% Confidence interval 6.82-14.35, P<0.001). Classification based on the findings of index and first surveillance colonoscopies more effectively stratifies the risk of subsequent advanced neoplasia, resulting in more proper allocation of colonoscopy resources after two consecutive colonoscopies.

Association of second surveillance colonoscopy findings with index and first surveillance colonoscopy results

OBJECTIVE

Although there have been established guidelines for first surveillance colonoscopy (FSC) after a polypectomy, there is no consensus on performing a second surveillance colonoscopy (SSC), especially in Asian countries. This study aimed to investigate the association of SSC findings with index total colonoscopy (TCS) and FSC results.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study involving 1928 consecutive Japanese patients who had received three or more colonoscopies. High-risk colonoscopic findings were defined as advanced adenoma (≥10 mm in size, with a villous histology or high-grade dysplasia) or more than three adenomas, whereas low-risk findings were defined as one to two non-advanced adenomas. On the basis of index TCS results, the patients were divided into three groups: no adenomas (NA) (n = 888), low-risk (LR) (n = 476), and high-risk (HR) (n = 564) groups, respectively.

RESULTS

In the NA group, the rate of high-risk findings on SSC was significantly higher in patients with high-risk or low-risk findings on FSC than in those with no adenoma (7.7% and 7.9% vs 2.2%, P < 0.05). Patients in the LR and HR groups with high-risk findings on FSC had a significantly higher risk on SSC than those with low-risk findings or no adenoma on FSC (LR group: 28.6%, 9.4%, and 5.9%, respectively, P < 0.01; HR group: 34.5%, 18.8%, and 7.9%, respectively, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Index TCS and especially FSC findings were predictive of SSC results. The study results may be useful for determining appropriate intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in Asian countries.

Can surveillance colonoscopy be discontinued in an elderly population with diminutive polyps?

OBJECTIVES

Surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection (ER) for adenomatous polyps reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its significance in the elderly population is uncertain. The study aimed to determine whether surveillance colonoscopy should be discontinued in the elderly population.

METHODS

We enrolled 105 patients who underwent baseline colonoscopy between January 2004 and December 2009 and were subsequently followed-up over 5 years in our institution. All had diminutive colorectal polyps and were aged <80 years at baseline colonoscopy and ≥80 years at follow-up in May 2018. Patients who had undergone colectomy or who had inflammatory bowel disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, and no diminutive polyps were excluded. The cumulative incidence of the target lesion was evaluated. Histopathological diagnoses included low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and carcinoma.

RESULTS

The target lesion was detected in 15% (16/105) of the patients. There was no invasive carcinoma; however, two HGDs were detected. There were three lesions that had increased from previously detected diminutive lesions, all of which were LGDs. There were no target lesions detected after 84 years of age, and the cumulative incidence was 0.20. The cumulative incidence was significantly higher in the group with HGD than in the group with no target lesions at baseline colonoscopy. There was no HGD after age 79 years, and the cumulative incidence was 0.019.

CONCLUSION

Surveillance colonoscopy for patients with diminutive polyps may be discontinued after age 79 years.

Incidence of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Individuals With Untreated Diminutive Colorectal Adenomas Diagnosed by Magnifying Image-Enhanced Endoscopy

OBJECTIVES

Because of the increasing number of detected diminutive colorectal adenomas, the "diagnose-and-do-not-resect" approach has recently attracted attention as an alternative to resection. We evaluated the cumulative incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in individuals with untreated diminutive adenomas and compared this incidence in individuals without adenomas.

METHODS

Data from 1,378 individuals who underwent first screening colonoscopy (CS) and at least one follow-up CS without polypectomy were analyzed. Patients with no adenomas or with only nonadvanced diminutive adenomas (<5 mm) diagnosed by magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy were scheduled to undergo a follow-up CS within 5 years after the initial CS without treatment. The participants were divided into 2 groups: those with untreated diminutive adenomas (group A) and those with no adenomas (group B). The cumulative incidence of ACN and the hazard ratio were assessed using Gray's test and the Fine and Gray model.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 60.9 months, 21 ACNs were detected. The 5-year cumulative incidences of ACN in group A (n = 361) and group B (n = 1,017) were 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-3.4) and 0.8% (95% CI: 0.3-1.7), respectively, without a statistically significant difference (P = 0.23). No ACNs developed from unresected adenomas. The smoking status was significantly associated with the incidence of ACN, and the hazard ratio for ACN in group A vs group B adjusted for smoking status was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.52-3.90; P = 0.48).

DISCUSSION

The low 5-year cumulative incidence of ACN suggests the potential to adopt the "diagnose-and-do-not-resect" strategy as an alternative option for diminutive adenomas not requiring excessive surveillance.

Clinical outcomes of the "resect and discard" strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps

Background and study aim  The "resect and discard" strategy is a new paradigm for the management of small colorectal polyps that reduces the cost and effort related to pathological diagnosis after polypectomy. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the clinical outcome of the "resect and discard" strategy for small colorectal polyps. Patients and methods  The clinical records were reviewed from 501 consecutive patients who underwent the "resect and discard" strategy for colorectal polyps smaller than 10 mm at our hospital between January 2008 and December 2010. All colorectal lesions were evaluated onsite under magnifying narrow-band imaging after careful conventional white-light imaging. In cases of low grade adenoma predicted with high confidence, colonoscopists selected the "resect and discard" option without formal histopathology. The mid-term outcomes were evaluated to validate the curability of the "resect and discard" strategy. Results  The present study included 501 consecutive patients with 816 lesions. The mid-term outcomes were examined for 476 (95 %) patients who received follow-up for at least 1 year after undergoing the "resect and discard" strategy. The median observation period was 83 months (range 12 - 117 months). No patient died from colorectal cancer related to the procedure, resulting in a disease-specific survival rate of 100 %. There were no local and/or distant recurrences detected during follow-up. Conclusions  The "resect and discard" strategy for small colorectal polyps under strict preoperative diagnosis achieves excellent mid-term outcome.