Reducing the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: a prospective multicenter observational study (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Difficult biliary cannulation is an independent risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP); however, there is a noticeable lack of studies focusing on the incidence and risk factors of PEP among patients undergoing easy cannulation. Therefore, we systematically investigated the risk factors for PEP in patients who underwent easy cannulation.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with naive major papillae who underwent diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP between June 2018 and June 2023. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence of PEP in patients with easy cannulation; secondary endpoints were identifying PEP risk factors and evaluating procedure-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Overall, 1930 patients were included, with 1061 (54.9%) undergoing easy cannulation. Within this cohort, PEP incidence was 3.0%, whereas 2.9% experienced procedure-related AEs, excluding PEP. A history of acute pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR], 6.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83-20.14; P = .001) and acute cholangitis on admission (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.07-5.08; P = .039) were identified as independent risk factors for PEP in patients with easy cannulation. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and biliary stent placement were independent factors for procedure-related AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the importance of assessing patient- and procedure-related factors to mitigate the risk of PEP in patients undergoing easy cannulation. Despite the low incidence of PEP, the potential for the occurrence of severe cases emphasizes the need for cautious intervention, particularly in patients with a history of acute pancreatitis and acute cholangitis on admission. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0005950.).

Prospective validation and revision of predictive models for post-ERCP pancreatitis: focus on procedure-related factors and a novel risk stratification approach

INTRODUCTION

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common serious adverse event after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Although retrospective models to predict PEP have shown promise, their real-world applicability remains uncertain. Thus, we used prospectively derived cohort data to validate current prediction models.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients who underwent ERCP between August 2020 and December 2023. We validated the original PEP-risk prediction models using prospective cohort data and, if necessary, refined them using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 1112 study participants, the original PEP-risk prediction models had limited performance. Although PEP incidence tended to increase across risk groups, the differences were mostly insignificant. Logistic regression highlighted procedural factors-total procedure time [odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.26 per 5 min], unintended pancreatic duct cannulation (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.11-5.93), and pancreatic opacification (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.19-5.58)-as independent PEP risk factors. This led to a revised model that assigned 1, 8, and 8 points to these factors. Patients stratified into low- (0-2 points), intermediate- (3-10 points), and high-risk groups (≥ 11 points) exhibited PEP incidences of 2.6% (95% CI 1.5-4.1%), 7.1% (95% CI 4.8-10.3%), and 12.6% (95% CI 8.6-17.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlighted limitations of existing PEP-prediction models that necessitate refinement based on procedural variables. Our revised model accounted for the prolonged total procedure time, unintended pancreatic duct cannulation, and pancreatic opacification, offering enhanced accuracy in predicting PEP risk.

Development and validation of a machine learning-based, point-of-care risk calculator for post-ERCP pancreatitis and prophylaxis selection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A robust model of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) risk is not currently available. We aimed to develop a machine learning-based tool for PEP risk prediction to aid in clinical decision making related to periprocedural prophylaxis selection and postprocedural monitoring.

METHODS

Feature selection, model training, and validation were performed using patient-level data from 12 randomized controlled trials. A gradient-boosted machine (GBM) model was trained to estimate PEP risk, and the performance of the resulting model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) with 5-fold cross-validation. A web-based clinical decision-making tool was created, and a prospective pilot study was performed using data from ERCPs performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital over a 1-month period.

RESULTS

A total of 7389 patients were included in the GBM with an 8.6% rate of PEP. The model was trained on 20 PEP risk factors and 5 prophylactic interventions (rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], aggressive hydration, combined rectal NSAIDs and aggressive hydration, pancreatic duct stenting, and combined rectal NSAIDs and pancreatic duct stenting). The resulting GBM model had an AUC of 0.70 (65% specificity, 65% sensitivity, 95% negative predictive value, and 15% positive predictive value). A total of 135 patients were included in the prospective pilot study, resulting in an AUC of 0.74.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of a novel machine learning-based PEP risk estimation tool with high negative predictive value to aid in prophylaxis selection and identify patients at low risk who may not require extended postprocedure monitoring.

Preventive Measures and Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of ERCP, with limited studies comparing combined prophylactic measures and their efficacy relative to individual patient risk profiles. This study aims to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) to evaluate the contribution of patient and ERCP-related risk factors to PEP development and to identify the best prophylaxis strategies according to the patient's risk profile.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases until November 2022 for randomized controlled PEP prophylaxis trials. We invited authors to share individual patient data, including PEP risk profile and prophylaxes used. PEP incidence rates for different prophylaxis were calculated. Efficacy was compared using multilevel logistic regression and expressed as relative risk (RR). Subgroup analysis evaluated the role of patient and ERCP-related risk factors in developing PEP.

RESULTS

Data from 11 studies, including 6430 patients, were analyzed. After adjusting for risk factors, rectal NSAIDs (RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.54-0.88) and peri-procedural high-volume intravenous fluid (IVF) (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.21-0.79) were effective in reducing PEP incidence, while no benefit was noted with pancreatic duct (PD) stents (RR 1.25, 95%CI 0.91-1.73). In patients receiving rectal NSAIDs (n = 2617), difficult cannulation (RR 1.99, 1.45-2.73), contrast injection into the pancreatic duct (PD) (RR2.37, 1.68-3.32), and prior history of PEP (RR 1.90, 1.06-3.41) were associated with increased PEP risk.

CONCLUSION

This IPDMA confirms that rectal NSAIDs and peri-procedural IVF are effective PEP prophylactic strategies. Further studies focusing on combination therapy or the development of personalized PEP risk calculators are needed to improve prophylactic strategies.

Endoscopic assessment of minor papilla morphology: Predictors of successful cannulation and procedural pancreatitis risk in minor papilla endotherapy

BACKGROUND

We evaluated for predictors of successful cannulation and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in minor papilla endotherapy (MPE), emphasizing endoscopic minor papilla morphology.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 232 MPEs in 65 patients, assessing minor papilla morphology based on three features: bulge as "prominent" or "subtle," mucosal appearance as "papilla-like" resembling the main papilla or "SMT-like" akin to a gastrointestinal submucosal tumor, and orifice visibility as "clear" or "unclear." Cannulation success was evaluated in 65 enrolled patients, with PEP risk assessed in all 232 MPEs.

RESULTS

Minor papilla morphology was categorized as prominent/subtle bulge in 42/23 patients, papilla-like/SMT-like mucosal appearance in 42/23, and clear/unclear orifice visibility in 24/41. Cannulation succeeded in 54/65 patients (83%). A papilla-like appearance and clear orifice visibility was significantly associated with cannulation success. PEP incidence was 5.2% and predominantly mild. A papilla-like appearance significantly decreased PEP incidence, while precutting technique and orifice dilation significantly increased PEP risk.

CONCLUSION

Evaluating minor papilla morphology may help predict cannulation success and PEP risk in MPE. A papilla-like mucosal appearance prognosticates cannulation success and reduced PEP risk, with clear orifice visibility serving as a success predictor. These findings provide practical guidance for preprocedural planning by emphasizing the importance of minor papilla morphology evaluation.

Real-world evidence comparing early and late pancreatic stent placement to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis

Background and study aims Pancreatic stenting effectively lowers the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and reduces its severity. However, limited research has been conducted to determine the optimal timing for pancreatic stent placement. Our objective was to evaluate whether early pancreatic stent placement (EPSP) is more effective than late pancreatic stent placement (LPSP) in preventing PEP among patients with naive papilla. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study that analyzed 590 patients with difficult biliary cannulation using the pancreatic guidewire technique, who were divided into EPSP and LPSP groups. In the EPSP group, a pancreatic stent was placed immediately before/after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Conversely, in the LPSP group, a pancreatic stent was placed after partial/all completion of major endoscopic procedures. Results From November 2017 to May 2023, 385 patients were in the EPSP group and 205 in the LPSP group. EPSP was associated with a decreased PEP occurrence compared with LPSP (2.9% vs. 7.3%; P = 0.012). Similarly, hyperamylasemia was lower in the EPSP group (19.7% vs. 27.8%; P = 0.026). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis using multivariable analysis and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis also validated these findings. Conclusions Early pancreatic stent placement reduced the incidence of PEP and hyperamylasemia compared with late pancreatic stent placement. Our findings favor pancreatic stenting immediately before/after ERC or EST.

Indomethacin Does Not Reduce Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-Risk Patients Receiving Pancreatic Stenting

BACKGROUND

Rectal indomethacin reduces pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding its added benefits in patients already receiving prophylactic pancreatic stenting. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of indomethacin in high-risk patients undergoing pancreatic stenting.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted on all patients who underwent the rescue cannulation technique for challenging bile duct cannulation (selected high-risk patients). Patients were split into two groups based on the prophylaxis method for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP): one receiving a combination of indomethacin and pancreatic stenting, while the other received pancreatic stenting alone. Comparative analyses were carried out on PEP, hyperamylasemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, and postoperative hospital stay among post-ERCP pancreatitis patients.

RESULTS

Between November 2017 and May 2023, a total of 607 patients with native papillae were enrolled, with 140 grouped into the indomethacin plus stent group and 467 into the stent alone group. The overall PEP rate was 4.4% in the entire cohort, with no statistical differences observed between the groups in terms of PEP rates (P = 0.407), mild PEP (P = 0.340), moderate to severe PEP (P = 1.000), hyperamylasemia (P = 0.543), gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.392), and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.521). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis using multivariable analysis also validated these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Indomethacin did not reduce the incidence or severity of PEP in high-risk patients who routinely received prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. Therefore, the additional administration of rectal indomethacin to further mitigate PEP appears to be not necessary.

Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy After Double Guidewire Technique Was Noninferior to Primary Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation

BACKGROUND

When unintentional pancreatic duct access occurs during difficult biliary cannulation, the double guidewire (DGW) or transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) may be utilized. DGW can be easily switched to TPS due to the existing guidewire in the pancreatic duct. However, the efficacy of TPS after DGW, named sequential DGW-TPS technique, versus primary TPS has not been assessed.

AIMS

Our aim was to compare the benefits and adverse events of sequential DGW-TPS technique and primary TPS.

METHODS

We performed a comparative retrospective cohort study that enrolled a total of 117 patients with native papillae. The patients were divided into one of 2 groups according to the primary bile duct access technique (sequential DGW-TPS or primary TPS), both with pancreatic stenting.

RESULTS

Between November 2017 and May 2023, a total of 84 patients were grouped into sequential DGW-TPS and 33 into primary TPS. The overall post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate was 4.3% in the entire cohort, with no statistical differences were observed between the groups in terms of PEP rates (P = 0.927), PEP severity (P = 1.000), first biliary cannulation success (P = 0.621), overall cannulation success (P = 1.000), hyperamylasemia incidence (P = 0.241), elevated amylase levels (P = 0.881), and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.185). Furthermore, these results remained consistent in multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The sequential DGW-TPS technique showed a comparable safety and biliary cannulation success rate to primary TPS in difficult biliary cannulation. Given the potential long-term complications associated with TPS, DGW should be first if inadvertent pancreatic access occurs, with TPS serving as second only if DGW fails.

Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Hemorrhagic Pancreatitis in a Young Female: A Case Report

Hemorrhagic pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an adverse event that has received limited attention in medical studies. We describe a 28-year-old female who was admitted with symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, along with tenderness in the right upper quadrant upon physical examination. CT abdomen revealed the presence of a gallstone obstructing the common bile duct. The patient underwent an ERCP procedure, which included a biliary sphincterotomy and the balloon-assisted removal of the obstructing stone. Unfortunately, the procedure was complicated with acute pancreatitis characterized by fluid accumulation in the abdomen, suggestive of hemorrhagic pancreatitis. There was a notable decrease in hemoglobin levels and hypotension, indicating the need for a higher level of care. Patients were managed conservatively with hydration and pain control. Follow-up in the clinic confirmed the resolution of symptoms and stabilization of the hemoglobin. Prompt recognition of post-ERCP hemorrhagic pancreatitis is crucial and warrants a high index of suspicion. Furthermore, the discussion explored the various risk factors and pathological events behind post-ERCP pancreatitis to understand the mechanisms of the disease. Various previously used intervention and prevention strategies were critically discussed for the awareness of future researchers and healthcare practitioners.

Meta-analysis on clinical outcomes of suprapapillary versus transpapillary stent insertion in malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic biliary stenting is an essential treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the optimal location for the placement of metal stents (MS) or plastic stents (PS) during the management of MBO, whether above (suprapapillary) or across (transpapillary) the sphincter of Oddi (SO), has not been thoroughly evaluated. This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided biliary stents placed above and across the SO in patients with MBO.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was carried out to identify studies published from inception to April 2022. The clinical outcomes examined including stent patency, stent occlusion, and overall adverse events (AEs) such as cholangitis, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding. The selection of a random-effects model or fixed-effects model was based on the presence of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles involving 751 patients were analyzed. The findings showed that the suprapapillary approach had longer stent patency compared to the transpapillary approach (mean difference: 38.58; 95% confidence interval 16.02-61.14, P < 0.0001). Additionally, the suprapapillary approach was associated with a lower risk of stent occlusion and overall AEs (P = 0.04, P = 0.002, respectively), particularly in the incidence of PEP (P = 0.009). The incidence of cholangitis, cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding were similar between the suprapapillary and transpapillary approaches. The subgroup analyses indicated that suprapillary PS had a significant decrease in the incidence of stent occlusion and longer stent patency, while suprapillary MS had a significant decrease in the incidence of overall AEs and PEP than the transpapillary approach.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the transpapillary approach, the suprapapillary stent had superiority in longer stent patency, lower rates of stent occlusion and overall AEs, and notably, a lower incidence of PEP. The incidence of cholangitis, cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding were similar between the suprapapillary and transpapillary approaches. Further large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings.

REGISTRATION NO

CRD42022336435.

Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Pathophysiology and Prevention

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential procedure for the management of pancreato-biliary disorders. Pancreatitis remains the most frequent complication of the ERCP procedure, and it is, therefore, necessary to recognize the pathophysiology and risk factors contributing to the development of pancreatitis and understand the methods to prevent this complication.

Frequent guidewire passage into the pancreatic duct is an independent risk factor for postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) among high-risk individuals: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial data

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the patient and procedural risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) among patients receiving rectal indomethacin.

METHODS

Data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of high-risk patients undergoing ERCP who received rectal indomethacin with or without topical epinephrine was evaluated. PEP was defined based on the consensus criteria. Pancreatic stenting was excluded to avoid confounding results with the role of epinephrine spray. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient and procedural risk factors for PEP.

RESULTS

Among 960 patients enrolled in the RCT, the PEP incidence was 6.4%. An increased risk of PEP was seen with age <50 years and female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-4.26), malignant biliary stricture(s) (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.52-8.10), >2 guidewire passes into the pancreatic duct (PD) (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.43-5.64), and pancreatic brush cytology (OR 6.37, 95% CI 1.10-36.90), whereas a decreased risk of PEP was seen with contrast- over guidewire-assisted cannulation (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.99) and the use of lactated Ringer's (LR) over other fluid types (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.98). There was a significant trend between the number of guidewire passes into the PD and PEP risk (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

More than two guidewire passes into the PD and pancreatic brush cytology increased while the use of LR decreased the risk of PEP among high-risk patients receiving rectal indomethacin. Pancreatic stent placement and/or LR should be considered in patients with >2 guidewire passes into the PD.

Pharmacological and Endoscopic Interventions for Prophylaxis of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) represents the most common serious complication after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) are the prophylactic interventions with more evidence and efficacy; however, PEP still represents a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Chronic statin use has been proposed as a prophylactic method that could be cheap and relatively safe. However, the evidence is conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic and pharmacological interventions including chronic statin and aspirin use, on the development of PEP.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive patients undergoing ERCP at John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County in Chicago from January 2015 to March 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 681 ERCPs were included in the study. Twelve (1.76%) developed PEP. Univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses did not show any association between chronic statin or aspirin use and PEP. PDS and rectal indomethacin were protective in patients undergoing pancreatic duct injection. Pancreatic duct injection, female sex, and younger age were associated with a higher risk. History of papillotomy was associated with lower risk only in the univariate analysis (all P values < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Chronic use of statins and aspirin appears to add no additional benefit to prevent ERCP pancreatitis. Rectal NSAIDs, and PDS after appropriate patient selection continue to be the main prophylactic measures. The lower incidence at our center compared with the reported data can be explained by the high rates of rectal indomethacin and PDS, the use of noninvasive diagnostic modalities for patient selection, and the expertise of the endoscopists.

Prevention of acute post-manipulation pancreatitis

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most informative and often in-demand methods for the detection and treatment of pathology of the biliary tract, its diagnostic value is 79-98%. A significant disadvantage of the method are side effects and various complications (acute pancreatitis, bleeding, retroduodenal perforation, cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, etc.). Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is a common and severe complication of intraluminal endoscopic operations on the large duodenal papilla, its etiology is multifactorial, and the pathophysiology has not yet been fully studied. According to many randomized, controlled studies, the incidence of PEP ranges from 2.7 to 37%. Despite all the possibilities of modern medicine and the introduction of new methods, mortality with the development of PEP remains at a very high level: it reaches 7-15%, and with the development of destructive forms - 40-70%. The problems of prevention of PEP are still the subject of discussions and numerous studies by leading clinics around the world. In this paper, we conducted a review of the literature over the past decade using the sources of major medical libraries Medline, eLibrary, PubMed. The article discusses current modern pathogenetic mechanisms and the main risk factors for the development of PEP, related to both the characteristics of the patient and the procedure being performed, technical options for performing ERCP. The article also presents currently used and recommended by most authors methods of drug prevention of PEP and various technical solutions related to this complication. Thus, the not entirely satisfactory results of the proposed methods of prevention of PEP force the authors to search for safer and more effective solutions to this urgent problem at the present time.

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting combined with 3D laparoscopic pancreatic tumor resection: Three case reports

RATIONALE

This study explored the safety and feasibility of 3D laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound techniques, which made minimally invasive pancreatic surgery more precise and detailed.

PATIENT CONCERN

Case 1 was a 51-year-old man with a primary complaint of pancreatic tumor. Case 2 was a 60-year-old woman with complaints of tinnitus for 1 week. Case 3 was a 21-year-old woman with complaints of epigastric pain and abdominal distension for 1 day.

DIAGNOSIS

Case 1 and Case 2 were diagnosed with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and Case 3 was diagnosed with an infected solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas.

INTERVENTIONS

All 3 patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in our hospital.

OUTCOMES

All cases received the same perioperative management and no localized stenosis or dilatation of the pancreatic duct was found during follow-up.

LESSONS

With the development of minimally invasive surgery and the application of 3D laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound technology, pancreatic tumors that are tightly adhered to the main pancreatic duct can successfully be removed using 3D laparoscopic operation.

Morphology of the major duodenal papilla for the selection of advanced cannulation techniques in difficult biliary cannulation

BACKGROUND

Morphology of the major duodenal papilla (MDP) influences the outcome of standard biliary cannulation. However, those data on advanced cannulation techniques are scarce. We aimed to study the impact of MDP morphology on the outcome of both standard and advanced cannulation methods.

METHODS

Images of naïve papilla were retrospectively reviewed and independently classified into 4 types (1: classic appearance, 2: small, 3: bulging, and 4: ridged papillae). All cannulation was started with guidewire cannulation. After failure, advanced cannulation including double guidewire (DG) and/or precut sphincterotomy (PS) was performed. Outcomes including success rate and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total 805 naïve papilla were included. The overall advanced cannulation rate was 23.2%. The MPD type 2 (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.8-2.9) and type 4 (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.8) required advanced cannulation technique at a higher rate than type 1. Type 3 significantly needed a higher proportion of PS when compared with type 1 (59.09% vs 27.03%, OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.51-10.06). Overall post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was 8% and was not different among MDP types. PEP was significantly increased in difficult cannulation group (15.38% vs 5.71%, p-value < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that DG independently increased risk of PEP (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.0-6.6).

CONCLUSIONS

MDP type 2 and type 4 were related to difficult cannulation. Although DG and PS can be used as advanced cannulation in all types, DG carries risk of PEP and PS may be preferred over DG in MDP type 3.

Risk factors of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary tract diseases

BACKGROUND

To investigate the risk factors of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with biliary tract diseases.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 480 patients who underwent ERCP for biliary tract diseases at the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from October 2011 to October 2016. The patients were divided into a study group (n = 75, with PEP) and a control group (n = 405, without PEP) based on whether they developed post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), and their clinical baseline data and intraoperative conditions were retrieved and compared. Then, factors associated with PEP were analyzed using logistic regression model, based on which a nomogram prediction model was constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model.

RESULTS

Significant differences in age, sex, history of pancreatitis, history of choledocholithiasis, pancreatic duct imaging, pancreatic sphincterotomy, difficult cannulation, multiple cannulation attempts and juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula were observed between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age less than 60 years (OR, 0.477; 95% CI, 0.26-0.855), female sex (OR, 2.162; 95% CI, 1.220-3.831), history of pancreatitis (OR, 2.567; 95% CI, 1.218-5.410), history of choledocholithiasis (OR, 2.062; 95% CI, 1.162-3.658), pancreatic sphincterotomy (OR, 2.387; 95% CI, 1.298-4.390), pancreatic duct imaging (OR, 4.429; 95% CI, 1.481-13.242), multiple cannulation attempts (OR, 2.327; 95% CI, 1.205-4.493), difficult cannulation (OR, 2.421; 95% CI, 1.143-5.128), and JPD (OR, 2.002; 95% CI, 1.125-3.564) were independent risk factors for PEP. The nomogram for predicting the occurrence of PEP demonstrated an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.787, and the calibration curves of the model showed good consistency between the predicted and actual probability of PEP.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that age less than 60 years, female sex, history of pancreatitis, history of choledocholithiasis, pancreatic sphincterotomy, pancreatic duct imaging, multiple cannulation attempts, difficult cannulation and juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula were independent risk factors for PEP. In addition, the established nomogram demonstrated promising clinical efficacy in predicting PEP risk in patients who underwent ERCP for biliary tract diseases.

ERCP in patients with prior sphincterotomy has a 50% lower rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and fewer unplanned hospital admissions

OBJECTIVES

ERCP is essential in managing pancreaticobiliary disease, with well-documented complications. Rates of clinically significant complications are about 10%, approximately half of which is related to post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). We aimed to quantify the effect of previous sphincterotomy on post-endoiscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collated from a contemporaneously collected database of 2876 consecutive ERCP procedures of a single operator in a tertiary referral centre. Analysis was conducted using R software, and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 2876 procedures (mean age 63 years, 56% female), 120 (4.2%) developed PEP and 268 (9.3%) had prolonged/unplanned hospital admission. Univariate analysis showed patients with previous sphincterotomy 28/1054 (2.7%) had decreased risk of PEP compared with those without sphincterotomy 92/1822 (5.0%) (OR 0.52, p = .0021). This difference was not evident when multivariate analysis for age, sex and indication was undertaken due to a particularly low risk of PEP in stent change patients (1.4%), which were disproportionately represented in the previous sphincterotomy group. The rate of prolonged/unplanned hospital admission was recorded for a total of 2876 patients, occurring in 184/1802 (10.1%) in the native ampulla group, versus 84/1045 (8.0%) in the previous sphincterotomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of PEP is halved by prior sphincterotomy. The presence of a biliary stent conferred an even lower risk of PEP (1.4%), but those without an in situ stent at the time of ERCP had a similar risk of PEP (4.6%) of prolonged/unplanned hospitalisation to those with a native ampulla.

Early prediction of post-ERCP pancreatitis by post-procedure amylase and lipase levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication attributed to the procedure, its incidence being approximately 9.7 %. Numerous studies have evaluated the predictive efficacy of post-procedure serum amylase and lipase levels but with varied procedure-to-test time intervals and cut-off values. The aim of this meta-analysis was to present pooled data from available studies to compare the predictive accuracies of serum amylase and lipase for PEP. Patients and methods  A total of 18 studies were identified after a comprehensive search of various databases until June 2021 that reported the use of pancreatic enzymes for PEP. Results  The sample size consisted of 11,790 ERCPs, of which PEP occurred in 764 (6.48 %). Subgroups for serum lipase and amylase were created based on the cut-off used for diagnosing PEP, and meta-analysis was done for each subgroup. Results showed that serum lipase more than three to four times the upper limit of normal (ULN) performed within 2 to 4 hours of ERCP had the highest pooled sensitivity (92 %) for PEP. Amylase level more than five to six times the ULN was the most specific serum marker with a pooled specificity of 93 %. Conclusions  Our analysis indicates that a lipase level less than three times the ULN within 2 to 4 hours of ERCP can be used as a good predictor to rule out PEP when used as an adjunct to patient clinical presentation. Multicenter randomized controlled trials using lipase and amylase are warranted to further evaluate their PEP predictive accuracy, especially in high-risk patients.

An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Aggressive Hydration Versus High-dose Rectal Indomethacin in the Prevention of Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographic Pancreatitis (AHRI-PEP)

BACKGROUND

Although rectal administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is recommended as the standard pharmacologic modality to prevent postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), vigorous periprocedural hydration (vHR) with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) is emerging as an effective prophylaxis modality for PEP. There has been no head-to-head comparison between these 2.

STUDY

This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, noninferiority, parallel-assigned, equal allocation, controlled clinical trial in a tertiary care hospital. Consecutive adults referred for ERCP, satisfying predefined inclusion criteria, underwent simple randomization and blinded allocation into 2 groups. Those allocated to vHR received intravenous LR at 3 mL/kg/h during procedure, 20 ml/kg bolus immediately afterward, and then at 3 mL/kg/h for another 8 hours. Those randomized to rectal Indomethacin received only per-rectal 100 mg suppository immediately post-ERCP. Assuming PEP of 9% in Indomethacin arm and noninferiority margin of 4%, we calculated sample size of 171 patients in each arm for 80% power and α-error 5%. Primary outcome was incidence of PEP, within 1 week, as defined by Cotton's criteria. All analysis were done by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

Between October, 2017 to February, 2018, 521 patients were assessed. In all, 352 were enrolled, 178 randomized to vHR, and 174 to per-rectal Indomethacin. Baseline details and ERCP outcomes were not different between 2 groups. PEP occurred in 6 (1.7%) overall, with 1 (0.6%) in hydration arm, and 5 (2.9%) in indomethacin arm; an absolute risk reduction of 2.3% (95% confidence interval: 0.9%-3.5%) and odds ratio of 0.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.02-1.65). Three patients developed severe PEP, all receiving indomethacin.

CONCLUSIONS

vHR with LR is noninferior to postprocedure per-rectal Indomethacin for PEP prevention (ClinicalTrials.govID:NCT03629600).

Pre- and post-procedure risk prediction models for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common serious adverse event. Given recent endoscopic advances, we aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for PEP using the latest clinical database.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of patients with naïve papilla who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Pre-ERCP and post-ERCP risk prediction models for PEP were developed using logistic regression analysis. Patients were classified into low- (0 points), intermediate- (1-2 points), and high-risk (≥ 3 points) groups according to point scores.

RESULTS

We included 760 and 735 patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The incidence of PEP was 5.5% in the derivation cohort and 3.9% in the validation cohort. Age ≤ 65 (1 point), female sex (1 point), acute pancreatitis history (2 points), malignant biliary obstruction (2 points [pre-ERCP model] or 1 point [post-ERCP model]), and pancreatic sphincterotomy (2 points, post-ERCP model only) were independent risk factors. In the validation cohort, the high-risk group (≥ 3 points) had a significantly higher risk of PEP compared to the low- or intermediate-risk groups under the post-ERCP risk prediction model (low: 2.0%; intermediate: 3.4%; high: 18.4%), while there was no significant between-group difference under the pre-ERCP risk prediction model (low: 2.2%; intermediate: 3.8%; high: 6.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated pre-ERCP and post-ERCP risk prediction models. In the latter, the high-risk group had a higher risk of PEP development than the low- or intermediate-risk groups. Our study findings will help clinicians stratify patient risk for the development of PEP.

The role of double-guidewire technique in preventing postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications increase with repeated cannulation attempts. We evaluated several advanced biliary cannulation techniques, which have been used when the standard approach fails, to increase the success rate and decrease post-ERCP complications. We aimed to evaluate the use of double-wire technique in terms of success rates and effects on post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and to assess the value of pancreatic duct stenting following needle-knife sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, randomized study was conducted on patients who underwent ERCP in Notre Dame De Secours University Hospital at Byblos, Lebanon, after obtaining the hospital's ethics committee approval. Patients were divided into three groups. The first group consisted of patients who had an ERCP and was divided into two subgroups, namely, one usingdouble-guidewire technique (DGT) only and another using an extra technique of precut with double-guidewire and pancreatic plastic stent placement. The second group of patients who had only ERCP was the control group. Finally, the third group endured the precut technique alone.

RESULTS

We could not prove any significant association between the intervention and the occurrence of pancreatitis when comparing double-wire technique plus ERCP to ERCP alone. When DGT with a pancreatic plastic stent was used, the incidence of PEP was significantly lower than that in other techniques.

CONCLUSION

DGT has a neutral effect on the reduction of PEP compared with the classic ERCP, but the technique can decrease the time of examination and increase success in difficult cases. ERCP using the double-guidewire with placement of a pancreatic plastic stent can contribute to decreasing PEP.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Children

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

AIM

To assess the prevalence and factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in a Chinese pediatric population.

METHODS

Sixty-six children who underwent ERCP between March 2018 and March 2019 at Shanghai Children's Medical Center were retrospectively recruited for the study. Clinical data, including demographics, indications, comorbidities, and procedural data, were reviewed to identify the prevalence and factors associated with PEP.

RESULTS

Ninety-two ERCPs were performed on 66 pediatric patients aged from 8 months to 14 years. The indications for ERCP were chronic pancreatitis (49, 53.2%), pancreaticobiliary maljunction (19, 20.7%), pancreas divisum (19, 20.7%), and pancreatic pseudocyst (5, 5.4%). All ERCPs were performed for therapeutic purposes. PEP was identified in 19 (20.7%) patients; there were ten mild cases, eight moderate cases, and one severe case. The univariate analysis revealed that a history of chronic pancreatitis was negatively associated with PEP (P = 0.033), and sphincterotomy was positively associated with PEP (P = 0.01). The multivariate analysis showed that sphincterotomy was a risk factor for PEP (P = 0.017, OR 4.17; 95% CI, 1.29, 13.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data revealed a high prevalence of PEP in a Chinese pediatric population. Chronic pancreatitis was a protective factor, and sphincterotomy was a risk factor for PEP development.

Anatomy of Major Duodenal Papilla Influences ERCP Outcomes and Complication Rates: A Single Center Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been one of the most intensely studied endoscopic procedures due to its overall high complication rates when compared to other digestive endoscopy procedures. The safety and outcome of such procedures have been linked to multiple procedure- or patient-related risk factors. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether the morphology of the major duodenal papilla influences the ERCP outcomes and complication rates.

METHODS

A total of 322 patients with a native papilla have been included in the study over an eight month period. Morphology of the papilla has been classified into normal papilla and four anatomical variations (Type I-IV). All patients have been prospectively monitored over a 15 day period after ERCP. Procedural outcomes and complication rates have been registered.

RESULTS

Morphology of the papilla influences both overall complication rates (95%CI, p = 0.0066) and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates (95%CI, p = 0.01001) in univariate analysis. Type IV papillae have proven to be independent risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in multivariate analysis (OR = 12.176, 95%CI, p = 0.005). Type I papillae have been significantly linked to difficult cannulation (AUC = 0.591, 95%CI, p = 0.008); Conclusions: In the monitored cohort morphology of the major duodenal papilla has significantly influenced both ERCP outcomes and post-procedural complication rates.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Complications and Their Management Strategies: A "Scoping" Literature Review

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a well-known procedure with both diagnostic and therapeutic utilities in managing pancreaticobiliary conditions. With the advancements of endoscopic techniques, ERCP has become a relatively safe and effective procedure. However, as ERCP is increasingly being utilized for different advanced techniques, newer complications have been noticed. Post-ERCP complications are known, and mostly include pancreatitis, infection, hemorrhage, and perforation. The risks of these complications vary depending on several factors, such as patient selection, endoscopist's skills, and the difficulties involved during the procedure. This review discusses post-ERCP complications and management strategies with new and evolving concepts.

Natural history of asymptomatic bile duct stones and association of endoscopic treatment with clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Due to increasing opportunities for abdominal imaging studies, bile duct stones are occasionally diagnosed without any symptoms. However, there has been no consensus on the management of asymptomatic bile duct stones. We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study to investigate the natural history of asymptomatic bile duct stones and clinical outcomes according to the timing of endoscopic removal.

METHODS

We identified consecutive patients who were diagnosed with asymptomatic common bile duct stones and categorized into those who were followed up with stones in situ (wait-and-see group) and those who received early endoscopic stone removal (intervention group). Cumulative incidence functions of biliary complications were estimated and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

We included 191 patients (114 patients in the wait-and-see group and 77 patients in the intervention group). In the wait-and-see group, the cumulative incidence of biliary complications was 6.1% at 1 year, 11% at 3 years, and 17% at 5 years. Asymptomatic disappearance of stones was observed in 22 patients (19%). Procedure-related adverse events of early endoscopic stone removal of asymptomatic stones were observed in 25 (32%) patients including 4 (5.2%) with severe pancreatitis. The cumulative incidence function of biliary complications did not differ by treatment strategies (P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary complications occurred in a substantial proportion of patients with asymptomatic bile duct stones, but early endoscopic removal appeared to have little effect on the prevention of further biliary complications. Given the risk of procedure-related pancreatitis, the wait-and-see strategy may become a management option of asymptomatic stones.

Comparative Efficacy of 9 Major Drugs for Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is one of the most common complications after ERCP. The optimal drugs for reducing the risk of PEP are still unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 9 major drugs used worldwide for the prevention of PEP through a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the literature up to October 2018 on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing allopurinol, diclofenac, gabexate (GAB), glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), indomethacin, nafamostat, octreotide, somatostatin, and ulinastatin for protection against PEP were included.

RESULTS

Eighty-six randomized controlled trials involving 25,246 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Results indicated that diclofenac, GAB, GTN, indomethacin, somatostatin, and ulinastatin were more effective than placebo with odds ratios ranging between 0.48 (95% credible interval, 0.26-0.86) for GAB and 0.61 (0.39-0.94) for somatostatin. However, allopurinol, nafamostat, and octreotide showed similar efficacy as placebo in reducing the risk of PEP. No significant differences were found in the efficacy between diclofenac, GAB, GTN, indomethacin, somatostatin, and ulinastatin. In terms of prognosis, GAB may be the most effective treatment (surface under the cumulative ranking curve=70.6%) and the least effective was octreotide (surface under the cumulative ranking curve=28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although our analysis suggests that GAB may be the most effective drug in preventing PEP, the limitations of our study warrants more high-quality head-to-head trials of these clinical drugs in the future.

Macroscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla influences bile duct cannulation: a prospective multicenter study by the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy Study Group for ERCP

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Certain appearances of the major duodenal papilla have been claimed to make cannulation more difficult during ERCP. This study uses a validated classification of the endoscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla to determine if certain types of papilla predispose to difficult cannulation.

METHODS

Patients with a naïve papilla scheduled for ERCP were included. The papilla was classified into 1 of 4 papilla types before cannulation started. Time to successful bile duct cannulation, attempts, and number of pancreatic duct passages were recorded. Difficult cannulation was defined as after 5 minutes, 5 attempts, or 2 pancreatic guidewire passages.

RESULTS

A total of 1401 patients were included from 9 different centers in the Nordic countries. The overall frequency of difficult cannulation was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39%-44%). Type 2 small papilla (52%; 95% CI, 45%-59%) and type 3 protruding or pendulous papilla (48%; 95% CI, 42%-53%) were more frequently difficult to cannulate compared with type 1 regular papilla (36%; 95% CI, 33%-40%; both P < .001). If an inexperienced endoscopist started cannulation, the frequency of failed cannulation increased from 1.9% to 6.3% (P < .0001), even though they were replaced by a senior endoscopist after 5 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla influences bile duct cannulation. Small type 2 and protruding or pendulous type 3 papillae are more frequently difficult to cannulate. In addition, cannulation might even fail more frequently if a beginner starts cannulation. These findings should be taken into consideration when performing studies regarding bile duct cannulation and in training future generations of endoscopists.

Identification of research trends concerning application of stent implantation in the treatment of pancreatic diseases by quantitative and biclustering analysis: a bibliometric analysis

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, with the development of biological materials, the types and clinical applications of stents have been increasing in pancreatic diseases. However, relevant problems are also constantly emerging. Our purpose was to summarize current hotspots and explore potential topics in the fields of the application of stent implantation in the treatment of pancreatic diseases for future scientific research.

METHODS

Publications on the application of stents in pancreatic diseases were retrieved from PubMed without language limits. High-frequency Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were identified through Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB). Biclustering analysis results were visualized utilizing the gCLUTO software. Finally, we plotted a strategic diagram.

RESULTS

A total of 4,087 relevant publications were obtained from PubMed until May 15th, 2018. Eighty-three high-frequency MeSH terms were identified. Biclustering analysis revealed that these high-frequency MeSH terms were classified into eight clusters. After calculating the density and concentricity of each cluster, strategy diagram was presented. The cluster 5 "complications such as pancreatitis associated with stent implantation" was located at the fourth quadrant with high centricity and low density.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found eight topics concerning the application of stent implantation in the treatment of pancreatic diseases. How to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic diseases by stent implantation could become potential hotspots in the future research.

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review for prevention and treatment

BACKGROUND

Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is comparatively complex application. Researchers has been investigated prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), since it has been considered to be the most common complication of ERCP. Although ERCP can lead various complications, it can also be avoided.

AIM

To study the published evidence and systematically review the literature on the prevention and treatment for PEP.

METHODS

A systematic literature review on the prevention of PEP was conducted using the electronic databases of ISI Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library for relevant articles. The electronic search for the review was performed by using the search terms “Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis” AND “prevention” through different criteria. The search was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed between January 2009 and February 2019. Duplicate studies were detected by using EndNote and deleted by the author. PRISMA checklist and flow diagram were adopted for evaluation and reporting. The reference lists of the selected papers were also scanned to find other relevant studies.

RESULTS

726 studies meeting the search criteria and 4 relevant articles found in the edited books about ERCP were identified. Duplicates and irrelevant studies were excluded by screening titles and abstracts and assessing full texts. 54 studies were evaluated for full text review. Prevention methods were categorized into three groups as (1) assessment of patient related factors; (2) pharmacoprevention; and (3) procedural techniques for prevention. Most of studies in the literature showed that young age, female gender, absence of chronic pancreatitis, suspected Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, recurrent pancreatitis and history of previous PEP played a crucial role in posing high risks for PEP. 37 studies designed to assess the impact of 24 different pharmacologic agents to reduce the development of PEP delivered through various administration methods were reviewed. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used to reduce risks for PEP. Rectal administration of indomethacin immediately prior to or after ERCP in all patients is recommended by European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines to prevent the development of PEP. The majority of the studies reviewed revealed that rectally administered indomethacin had efficacy to prevent PEP. Results of the other studies on the other pharmacological interventions had both controversial and promising results. Thirteen studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 4 distinct procedural techniques to prevent the development of PEP were reviewed. Pancreatic Stent Placement has been frequently used in this sense and has potent and promising benefits in the prevention of PEP. Studies on the other procedural techniques have had inconsistent results.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of PEP involves multifactorial aspects, including assessment of patients with high risk factors for alternative therapeutic and diagnostic techniques, administration of pharmacological agents and procedural techniques with highly precise results in the literature.

Reducing the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis using 4-Fr pancreatic plastic stents placed with common-type guidewires: Results from a prospective multinational registry

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pancreatic plastic stents (PPS) can reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). Prospective multicenter documentation of PEP rate after PPS placement is scarce. A new 4-Fr stent designed to be deployed over a 0.035-inch guidewire was used to assess the effectiveness of PEP prophylaxis.

METHODS

High-PEP-risk patients received a 4-Fr PPS for primary or secondary prophylaxis at seven centers in four countries. Patients were followed until spontaneous PPS migration, endoscopic stent removal, or for 4 months, whichever came first. Main outcome was PEP rate.

RESULTS

One hundred six (106) patients received PPS for PEP prophylaxis [61 (58%) primary, 45 (42%) secondary prophylaxis]. Median age was 54 years. Eighty-one (76%) PPS were placed using a 0.035-inch guidewire. By investigator choice 99 (93%) stents were single pigtail. Median stent length was 8 cm (range 3-12 cm). Technical success achieved in 100% of cases. Two patients in the primary prophylaxis group (3%, 95% CI 0.4-11%) experienced mild/moderate PEP. Seventy-eight PPS available for analysis underwent spontaneous migration after a median of 29 days. There were no reports of stent-induced ductal trauma. Post-hoc analysis of migration rate by PPS length showed no statistically significant trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Among high-risk patients in the primary prophylaxis group, observed rates of PEP are low (3%, 95% CI 0.4-11%) with the use of prophylactic 4-Fr pancreatic duct stents compatible with a 0.035-inch guidewire. This low rate is not unequivocally due to the prophylactic stent.

Fluid sequestration is a useful parameter in the early identification of severe disease of acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Early identification of severe disease of acute pancreatitis (AP) is of critical importance to improve the prognosis. Fluid sequestration (FS), calculated from administrated fluid and fluid output, is a simple prognostic parameter. We examined its utility in the early phase of AP.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated AP patients between January 2009 and April 2017. We compared FS in the first 24 h (FS24) with FS in the first 48 h (FS48) and administrated fluid volume within the first 24 h (FV24). Diagnostic yield for predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission and persistent organ failure (POF) was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. We also evaluated risk factors for developing severe disease of AP.

RESULTS

A total of 400 AP patients were included in the analysis (median age 64 years; male 60%). According to the Japanese severity criteria, 158 patients (40%) were diagnosed as severe disease. The rates of mortality, ICU admission and POF were 0.8%, 4.5% and 7.3%, respectively. FS24 showed a similar predictive accuracy in comparison with FS48 and was superior to FV24 in predicting ICU admission and POF. FS24 ≥ 1.6 L, male sex, presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and computed tomography severity index ≥ 3 on admission were independent risk factors for disease progression in AP in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

FS24 was a simple and easily calculated parameter with high predictive accuracy for discriminating patients who needed intensive care. Patients with FS24 ≥ 1.6 L had an increased risk of developing severe disease.

Effect of somatostatin on prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis of all available studies on the effect of prophylactic somatostatin administration on prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) and post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEHA).

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and the Science Citation Index were searched to retrieve relevant trials. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials in adult patients that compared somatostatin versus placebo in prevention of PEP were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to assess the ratios of PEP, PEHA and post-ERCP abdominal pain.

RESULTS

Total ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group. For the short-term injection or bolus injection there were no heterogeneity and no significance between the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group and placebo group. For the long-term injection subgroup there was heterogeneity, and the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group. There was no significance between the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group and placebo group for the low-risk PEP subgroup, while the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group for the high-risk PEP subgroup. The ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group for the long-term injection high-risk PEP subgroup. There was no significance between the ratio of PEHA of somatostatin group and placebo group for the short-term injection subgroup or bolus injection subgroup. The ratio of PEHA of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group for the long-term injection subgroup. The total ratio of post-ERCP abdominal pain of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group. The funnel plot of incidence of PEP and PEHA showed no asymmetry with a negative slope.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic use of long-term injection of somatostatin can significantly reduce the incidence of PEP, PEHA and post-ERCP abdominal pain for the high-risk PEP patients, while it is not necessary to be used for the low-risk PEP patients.

Choledocholithiasis: Treatment Options in a Tertiary Care Setup in Pakistan

Introduction Among patients with cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis may also be present in about 18% of cases. They can be treated through various endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open surgical procedures. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with choledocholithiasis being treated in our setup. Methods This descriptive case series was conducted at Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan over two years from January 2015 to December 2016. All patients with choledocholithiasis admitted to Surgical Unit 1 were included in this study. All patients underwent elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In patients with successful ERCP, laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy was performed at a later date. In patients in whom ERCP failed, open surgical clearance of the common bile duct (CBD), along with cholecystectomy, was done. Results A total of 200 cases of choledocholithiasis were admitted during the study period. Most of the participants (73%) in this study were female. Liver function tests were found to be deranged in 88 patients (44%) and normal in 112 patients (56%). At presentation, 3.5% (n=7) had concomitant acute biliary pancreatitis and 8% (n=16) had cholangitis. Successful ERCP followed by cholecystectomy was performed in 88.5% of cases. On the other hand, 11.5% (n=23) patients had failed ERCP due to impacted stones. They underwent open surgical procedures, i.e. 43.48% (n=10) had choledochotomies, 47.82% (n=11) had choledochoduodenostomies and 8.69% (n=2) had hepaticojejunostomies. No postoperative mortality was observed. However, anastomotic leaking occurred in 8.69% cases (n=2). Conclusion A two-staged procedure consisting of ERCP, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, should be the first line of treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones. In cases where ERCP fails, open surgical procedures still remain a relevant and a definitive option in resource-constrained setups.