Intraductal placement of a fully covered metal stent with a long string for distal malignant biliary obstruction without endoscopic sphincterotomy: Prospective multi-center feasibility study

Safety and efficacy of biliary suprapapillary metal and plastic stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biliary drainage is vital in managing malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Suprapapillary stenting has emerged as a viable alternative to transpapillary stenting and is performed using inside plastic (iPS) or metal stents (iMS). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of suprapapillary stent placement for MBO.

METHODS

The Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to include all studies published before September 31, 2023, that reported on the outcomes of suprapapillary stents placed for MBO. Using the random-effect model, the pooled, weight-adjusted event rate estimate for the clinical outcomes was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included, with a total of 1401 patients. The pooled clinical success rate was 98.9%. A subgroup analysis yielded non-significant differences between the iPS and iMS groups (99.3% vs. 98.6%, respectively; P = 0.44). The pooled incidence rate of adverse events (AE) with suprapapillary stents was 9.5%. In a subgroup analysis, the incidence of AEs with iPS was 10.7% compared to 9% in the iMS group without a statistical difference (P = 0.32). The most common adverse event was cholangitis (2.2%), followed by pancreatitis (1.1%), cholecystitis (0.5%), and bleeding (0.12%).

CONCLUSION

When technically feasible, suprapapillary stenting for MBO is a viable endoscopic option with a high clinical success rate and acceptable adverse event rates. Both iPS and iMS exhibit similar efficacy.

Long-term outcomes of fully covered self-expandable metal stents for refractory biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study at a tertiary center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic multiple plastic stents are an established first-line treatment for anastomotic biliary stricture (ABS) management after liver transplantation (LT). Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) have recently been used with favorable outcomes, but long-term treatment outcomes remain an issue for ABS. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of FCSEMS for the management of refractory ABS after LT.

METHODS

We reviewed the prospectively collected and maintained endoscopic retrograde cholangiography database at Asan Medical Center to retrieve consecutive post-LT ABS cases that underwent an endoscopic FCSEMS placement between August 2009 and August 2019 after MPS placement failure.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this study. Technical success had been achieved in all subjects (100%). The median stent placement duration was 3.1 months (IQR 2.7-6.1). Stricture resolution was achieved in 26 patients (clinical success 76.5%, 95% confidence interval 62-91). Early adverse events developed in 3 patients (8.8%), including distal stent migration. Late adverse events occurred in 9 patients (26.5%), including cholangitis (n = 7, 20.6%) and asymptomatic distal stent migration (n = 2, 5.9%). The median follow-up period was 57.9 months (IQR 51.9-64.3). Stricture recurrence occurred in 3 of 26 patients who achieved clinical success (11.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

FCSEMS placement appears to be an effective and advisable intervention for refractory ABS as it can provide persistent stricture improvement over the long-term.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid after self-expandable metal stent placement in malignant distal biliary obstruction: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sludge occlusion is a primary reason for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement. However, the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for SEMS occlusion remains unexplored to date. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of UDCA after SEMS placement for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO).

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-four patients were included, of which 60 received UDCA. Additionally, we conducted a propensity score-matched cohort analysis on 110 patients with SEMS placement for MDBO to reduce selection bias. Patients were categorized into 2 groups of 55 each, based on whether they received UDCA. In the UDCA group, the treatment was administered for more than a month. The primary endpoint was the time to RBO (TRBO) after SEMS placement. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate SEMS occlusion rate and early adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The cumulative SEMS occlusion rate was 41.8% and 18.2% in the groups with and without UDCA, respectively (P = .0119). Median TRBO was significantly longer in the control group than in the UDCA group (528 vs 154 days, P = .0381). In the multivariate analysis, UDCA administration was identified as the independent risk factor for reducing TRBO (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.88; P = .0348). The overall early AE rate showed insignificant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Administering UDCA after SEMS placement was not efficacious for prolonging the TRBO in MDBO. Moreover, administering UDCA beyond a month might increase the risk of stent sludge occlusion. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000046862.).

Outcomes of Intraductal Placement of Covered Metal Stents for Unresectable Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Intraductal self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement may prolong stent patency by reducing duodenobiliary reflux. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this biliary drainage method in patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Consecutive patients with unresectable MBO who underwent initial covered SEMS placement between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the causes of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), adverse events (AEs), and reintervention rates between two biliary drainage methods (SEMSs placed above and across the papilla). A total of 86 patients were included (above: 38 and across: 48). Overall RBO rates (24% vs. 44%, p = 0.069) and median TRBO (11.6 months vs. 9.8 months, p = 0.189) were not significantly different between the two groups. The frequency of overall AEs was similar between the two groups in the entire cohort, but was significantly lower in patients with non-pancreatic cancer (6% vs. 44%, p = 0.035). Reintervention was successfully performed in the majority of patients in both groups. Intraductal SEMS placement was not associated with a prolonged TRBO in this study. Larger studies are warranted to further evaluate the benefit of intraductal SEMS placement.

Comparison of an Inside Stent and a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent as Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Patients with Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is a need for a more tolerable preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). In recent years, inside stents (ISs) have attracted attention as a less suffering PBD method. Few studies have compared IS with a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (FCSEMS) as PBD for resectable PHCC. The aim of this study is to compare them.

METHODS

This study involved 86 consecutive patients (IS: 51; FCSEMS: 35). The recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate until undergoing surgery or being diagnosed as unresectable, time to RBO, factors related to RBO, incidence of adverse events related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and postoperative complications associated with each stent were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse events after stent insertion. After propensity score matching, the mean (SD) time to RBO was 37.9 (30.2) days in the IS group and 45.1 (35.1) days in the FCSEMS group, with no significant difference (P=0.912, log-rank test). A total of 7/51 patients in the IS group and 3/35 patients in the FCSEMS group developed RBO. The only risk factor for RBO was bile duct obstruction of the future excisional liver lobe(s) due to stenting (HR 29.8, P=0.008) in the FCSEMS group, but risk factors could not be indicated in the IS group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bile leakage or liver failure. In contrast, pancreatic fistula was significantly more common in the FCSEMS group (13/23 patients) than in the IS group (3/28 patients) (P < 0.001), especially in patients who did not undergo pancreatectomy (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

As PBD, both IS and FCSEMS achieved low RBO rates. Compared with FCSEMS, IS shows no difference in RBO rate, is associated with fewer postoperative complications, and is considered an appropriate means of PBD for resectable PHCC. This trail is registered with UMIN000025631.

Safety and Efficacy of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Biliary Stent Placement

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is the first-line chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC); however, there are concerns regarding its safety in patients undergoing biliary stent placement. This study aimed to examine the tolerability and efficacy of GnP in MPC patients who underwent biliary stent placement.

METHODS

A total of 105 MPC patients who had received GnP treatment between 2015 and 2020 were included and investigated. The patients were divided into two groups: those undergoing biliary stent placement for symptomatic biliary obstruction (BO) (With-BO group) and those without biliary stent placement (Without-BO group). The best tumor response, overall survival (OS), and adverse events in each group were compared.

RESULTS

The partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates were 22%, 61%, and 14.6% in the With-BO group, and 26.6%, 46.9%, and 21.9% in the Without-BO group, respectively, with no significant differences. The median OS was 12.2 months and 14.6 months in the With-BO and Without-BO groups, respectively (P = 0.483). Grade 3 or higher biliary tract-related events were significantly more common in the With-BO group (41.5%) than in the Without-BO group (1.6%) (P < 0.001), but all events were managed successfully by urgent intervention. The rates of any treatment-related toxicities, including febrile neutropenia, were not significantly different, and there were no chemotherapy-related deaths in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

GnP can be as tolerable and effective in MPC patients with biliary stents as in those without biliary stents. However, careful management and appropriate reintervention to treat biliary tract-related adverse events are required.

Feasibility of biliary stenting to distal malignant biliary obstruction using a novel designed metal stent with duckbill-shaped anti-reflux valve

OBJECTIVES

Anti-reflux metal stent (ARMS) has been used to prevent recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) due to sludge formation or food impaction. However, the most suitable ARMS remains to be identified. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of biliary drainage using duckbill-shaped ARMS (D-ARMS).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective observational study conducted at three Japanese tertiary institutions. Patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction who underwent biliary stenting using D-ARMS were eligible to participate. Technical success, functional success, adverse event (AE), and time to RBO (TRBO) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent biliary stenting using D-ARMS from December 2018 to October 2019. The technical success rate and functional success rate were 93% and 87%, respectively. However, nonvisibility of the markers at the tip of the metal stent or spontaneous extension was occasionally observed, making biliary stenting using D-ARMS difficult. Early AE occurred in 10% of the patients including cholangitis and pancreatitis. During the median postprocedural observation time of 5.1 months (range, 0.8-22.8), RBO occurred in 33% and the median TRBO was 261 days. As for reintervention, D-ARMS could be extracted in 67% of the patients with RBO. However, the stent was torn off on removal in half of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some modifications are still needed, D-ARMS was feasible and safe for biliary drainage, and sufficient TRBO was achieved. Subsequent multi-institutional studies involving a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period are warranted to validate the present results.

Antireflux metal stent for biliary obstruction: Any benefits?

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stent placement has been utilized as standard palliative management of distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Compared to plastic stents, metal stents can provide longer-term relief of symptoms. When a large-bore metal stent is placed across the ampulla, patients are predisposed to the risk of cholangitis or stent dysfunction due to reflux of duodenal contents. To mitigate the risk of adverse events associated with the duodenobiliary reflux, efforts have been directed to development of antireflux metal stents (ARMSs). The antireflux property has been introduced through adding of an antireflux valve to the duodenal stent end. Evidence from clinical studies indicates that ARMSs may not only reduce the risk of ascending cholangitis during follow-up but also prolong stent patency time. However, the results of clinical studies testing ARMSs are inconsistent owing to heterogeneous designs of antireflux valves and stent bodies. Metal stents are increasingly indicated for benign biliary strictures and MBO in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and therefore, research is warranted to evaluate ARMSs for those indications. Given that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural biliary drainage has gained popularity, the optimal timing of placing an ARMS in relation to EUS-guided and percutaneous drainage should be investigated. Development and evaluation of ARMSs require an integrative approach utilizing phantom and animal models, measurements of stent mechanical properties, and in vivo functional study after stent placement. In this review article, we summarize updated evidence on ARMSs for MBO and discuss issues that should be addressed in future studies.