Impact of an artificial intelligence-aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Artificial intelligence for reducing missed detection of adenomas and polyps in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate, and the effectiveness of routine colonoscopy largely depends on the endoscopist’s expertise. In recent years, computer-aided detection (CADe) systems have been increasingly integrated into colonoscopy to improve detection accuracy. However, while most studies have focused on adenoma detection rate (ADR) as the primary outcome, the more sensitive adenoma miss rate (AMR) has been less frequently analyzed.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of CADe in colonoscopy and assess the advantages of AMR over ADR.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using predefined search strategies to identify relevant studies published up to August 2, 2024. Statistical analyses were performed to compare outcomes between groups, and potential publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Five studies comprising 1624 patients met the inclusion criteria. AMR was significantly lower in the CADe-assisted group than in the routine colonoscopy group (147/927, 15.9% vs 345/960, 35.9%; P < 0.01). However, CADe did not provide a significant advantage in detecting advanced adenomas or lesions measuring 6-9 mm or ≥ 10 mm. The polyp miss rate (PMR) was also lower in the CADe-assisted group [odds ratio (OR), 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.52; P < 0.01]. While the overall ADR did not differ significantly between groups, the ADR during the first-pass examination was higher in the CADe-assisted group (OR, 1.37; 95%CI: 1.10-1.69; P = 0.004). The level of evidence for the included randomized controlled trials was graded as moderate.

CONCLUSION

CADe can significantly reduce AMR and PMR while improving ADR during initial detection, demonstrating its potential to enhance colonoscopy performance. These findings highlight the value of CADe in improving the detection of colorectal neoplasms, particularly small and histologically distinct adenomas.

Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: Ethical and diagnostic challenges in clinical practice

This article discusses the manuscript recently published in the World Journal of Gastroenterology, which explores the application of deep learning models in decision-making processes via wireless capsule endoscopy. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into gastrointestinal disease diagnosis represents a transformative step toward precision medicine, enhancing real-time accuracy in detecting multi-category lesions at earlier stages, including small bowel lesions and precancerous polyps, ultimately improving patient outcomes. However, the use of AI in clinical settings raises ethical considerations that extend beyond technological potential. Issues of patient privacy, data security, and potential diagnostic biases require careful attention. AI models must prioritize diverse and representative datasets to mitigate inequities and ensure diagnostic accuracy across populations. Furthermore, balancing AI with clinical expertise is crucial, positioning AI as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for physician judgment. Addressing these ethical challenges will support the responsible deployment of AI, through equitable contribution to patient-centered care.

Random forests algorithm using basic medical data for predicting the presence of colonic polyps

Background

Colorectal cancer is considered to be triggered by the malignant transformation of colorectal polyps. Early diagnosis and excision of colorectal polyps has been found to lower the mortality and morbidity associated with colorectal cancer.

Objective

The aim of this study is to offer a predictive model for the presence of colorectal polyps based on Random Forests machine learning algorithm, using basic patient information and common laboratory test results.

Materials and methods

164 patients were included in the study. The following data was collected: sex, residence, age, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, fasting blood glucose levels, hemoglobin, platelets, total, LDL and HLD cholesterol, triglycerides, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, chronic gastritis, presence of colonic polyps at colonoscopy. 80% of patients were included in the training set for creating a Random forests algorithm, 20% were in the test set. External validation was performed on data from 42 patients. The performance of the Random Forests was compared with the performance of a generalized linear model (GLM) and support vector machine (SVM) built and tested on the same datasets.

Results

The Random Forest prediction model gave an AUC of 0.820 on the test set. The top five variables in order of importance were: body mass index, platelets, hemoglobin, triglycerides, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase. For external validation, the AUC was 0.79. GLM performance in internal validation was an AUC of 0.788, while for external validation AUC-0.65. For SVN, the AUC - 0.785 for internal validation and 0.685 for the external validation dataset.

Conclusions

A random forest prediction model was developed using patient's demographic data, medical history and common blood tests results. This algorithm can foresee, with good predictive power, the presence of colonic polyps.

Variability in computer-aided detection effect on adenoma detection rate in randomized controlled trials: A meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND

Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems may increase adenoma detection rate (ADR) during colonoscopy. However, the variable results of CADe effects in different RCTs warrant investigation into factors influencing these results.

AIMS

Investigate the different variables possibly affecting the impact of CADe-assisted colonoscopy and its effect on ADR.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until July 2023 for RCTs reporting performance of CADe systems in the detection of colorectal neoplasia. The main outcome was pooled ADR. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to obtain the pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI)). To explore sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a meta-regression analysis using both univariable and multivariable mixed-effects models. Potential explanatory variables included factors influencing adenoma prevalence, such as patient gender, age, and colonoscopy indication. We also included both key (ADR), and minor (Withdrawal time) performance measures considered as quality indicators for colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 19,077 patients were include. ADR was higher in the CADe group (46 % [95 % CI 39-52]) than in the standard colonoscopy group (38 % [95 % CI 31-46]) with a risk ratio of 1.22 [95 % CI 1.14-1.29]); and a substantial level of heterogeneity (I2 = 67.69 %). In the univariable meta-regression analysis, patient age, ADR in control arms, and withdrawal time were the strongest predictors of CADe effect on ADR (P < .001). In multivariable meta-regression, ADR in control arms, and withdrawal time were simultaneous significant predictors of the proportion of the CADe effect on ADR.

CONCLUSION

The substantial level of heterogeneity found appeared to be associated with variability in colonoscopy quality performances across the studies, namely ADR in control arm, and withdrawal time.

Innovative approaches in colorectal cancer screening: advances in detection methods and the role of artificial intelligence

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer globally and poses a significant health threat, making early detection crucial. This review paper explored emerging detection methods for early screening of CRC, including gut microbiota, metabolites, genetic markers, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies. Current screening methods have their respective advantages and limitations, particularly in detecting precursors. First, the importance of the gut microbiome in CRC progression is discussed, highlighting how specific microbial alterations can serve as biomarkers for early detection, potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy when combined with traditional screening methods. Next, research on metabolic reprogramming illustrates the relationship between metabolic changes and CRC, with studies developing metabolite-based detection models that show good sensitivity for early diagnosis. In terms of genetic markers, methylated DNA markers like SEPTIN9 have demonstrated high sensitivity, although further validation across diverse populations is necessary. Lastly, AI technology has shown immense potential in improving adenoma detection rates, significantly enhancing the quality of colonoscopic examinations through image recognition techniques. This review aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on new strategies for CRC screening, emphasizing the potential of noninvasive detection technologies and the prospects of AI and genomics in clinical applications. Despite several challenges, this review advocates for future large-scale prospective studies to validate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these new screening methods while promoting the implementation of screening protocols tailored to individual characteristics.

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence: Computer-aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps

Objectives

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for screening cancer and precancerous lesions in the large intestine. Recently, remarkable advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various computer-aided detection (CADe) systems for colonoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of AI for colonoscopy using CAD-EYEⓇ (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) to calculate the adenoma miss rate (AMR).

Methods

This randomized, open-label, single-center, tandem study was conducted at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital from February 2022 to November 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to the CADe or non-CADe group. Immediately after the completion of the first endoscopy by an endoscopist, a new endoscopist was assigned to perform the second endoscopy. As a result, different endoscopists performed the examinations in a tandem fashion. A missed lesion was defined as a newly detected colorectal polyp by the second endoscopy. Finally, the AMR was compared between the two groups.

Results

The study population comprised 48 patients in the CADe group and 46 patients in the non-CADe group. The AMR was 17.4% in the CADe group and 30.3% in the non-CADe group. Therefore, the AMR in the CADe group was statistically significantly lower than that in the non-CADe group (P=0.009).

Conclusions

The application of CAD-EYEⓇ to colonoscopy reduced the AMR. Overall, CAD-EYEⓇ might be useful for reducing missed colorectal adenomas.

Use of artificial intelligence improves colonoscopy performance in adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to improve adenoma detection during colonoscopy. This meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated evaluation of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems and their impact on key colonoscopy quality indicators.

METHODS

We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases from inception until February 15, 2024, for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the performance of CADe systems with routine unassisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal adenomas.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight RCTs were selected for inclusion involving 23,861 participants. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a 20% increase in adenoma detection rate (risk ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.27; P < .01) and 55% decrease in adenoma miss rate (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37-0.54; P < .01) with AI-assisted colonoscopy. Subgroup analyses involving only expert endoscopists demonstrated a similar effect size (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.27; P < .001), with similar findings seen in analysis of differing CADe systems and healthcare settings. CADe use also significantly increased adenomas per colonoscopy (weighted mean difference, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.29; P < .01), primarily because of increased diminutive lesion detection, with no significant difference seen in detection of advanced adenomas. Sessile serrated lesion detection (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93-1.30; P = .27) and miss rates (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.16-1.19; P = .11) were similar. There was an average 0.15-minute prolongation of withdrawal time with AI-assisted colonoscopy (weighted mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.25; P = .01) and a 39% increase in the rate of non-neoplastic resection (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.23-1.57; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved adenoma detection but not sessile serrated lesion detection irrespective of endoscopist experience, system type, or healthcare setting.

The application of the combination between artificial intelligence and endoscopy in gastrointestinal tumors

Gastrointestinal (GI) tumors have always been a major type of malignant tumor and a leading cause of tumor‐related deaths worldwide. The main principles of modern medicine for GI tumors are early prevention, early diagnosis, and early treatment, with early diagnosis being the most effective measure. Endoscopy, due to its ability to visualize lesions, has been one of the primary modalities for screening, diagnosing, and treating GI tumors. However, a qualified endoscopist often requires long training and extensive experience, which to some extent limits the wider use of endoscopy. With advances in data science, artificial intelligence (AI) has brought a new development direction for the endoscopy of GI tumors. AI can quickly process large quantities of data and images and improve diagnostic accuracy with some training, greatly reducing the workload of endoscopists and assisting them in early diagnosis. Therefore, this review focuses on the combined application of endoscopy and AI in GI tumors in recent years, describing the latest research progress on the main types of tumors and their performance in clinical trials, the application of multimodal AI in endoscopy, the development of endoscopy, and the potential applications of AI within it, with the aim of providing a reference for subsequent research.

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of computer-aided detection (CADe) system-enhanced colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy suggest increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) and decreased adenoma miss rate (AMR), but the effect on detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review to compare performance of CADe-enhanced and conventional colonoscopy.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched through February 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Published RCTs comparing CADe-enhanced and conventional colonoscopy.

DATA EXTRACTION

Average adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) and ACN per colonoscopy were primary outcomes. Adenoma detection rate, AMR, and ACN detection rate (ACN DR) were secondary outcomes. Balancing outcomes included withdrawal time and resection of nonneoplastic polyps (NNPs). Subgroup analyses were done by neural network architecture.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Forty-four RCTs with 36 201 cases were included. Computer-aided detection-enhanced colonoscopies have higher average APC (12 090 of 12 279 [0.98] vs. 9690 of 12 292 [0.78], incidence rate difference [IRD] = 0.22 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.28]) and higher ADR (7098 of 16 253 [44.7%] vs. 5825 of 15 855 [36.7%], rate ratio [RR] = 1.21 [CI, 1.15 to 1.28]). Average ACN per colonoscopy was similar (1512 of 9296 [0.16] vs. 1392 of 9121 [0.15], IRD = 0.01 [CI, -0.01 to 0.02]), but ACN DR was higher with CADe system use (1260 of 9899 [12.7%] vs. 1119 of 9746 [11.5%], RR = 1.16 [CI, 1.02 to 1.32]). Using CADe systems resulted in resection of almost 2 extra NNPs per 10 colonoscopies and longer total withdrawal time (0.53 minutes [CI, 0.30 to 0.77]).

LIMITATION

Statistically significant heterogeneity in quality and sample size and inability to blind endoscopists to the intervention in included studies may affect the performance estimates.

CONCLUSION

Computer-aided detection-enhanced colonoscopies have increased APC and detection rate but no difference in ACN per colonoscopy and a small increase in ACN DR. There is minimal increase in procedure time and no difference in performance across neural network architectures.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None. (PROSPERO: CRD42023422835).

Performance of Computer-Aided Detection and Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Colonoscopy Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for detecting and characterizing colorectal polyps during colonoscopy, offering potential enhancements in traditional colonoscopy procedures to improve outcomes in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the impact of an AI tool on computer-aided detection (CADe) assistance during colonoscopy in this population.

METHODS

This case-control study utilized propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, race, and colonoscopy indication to analyze a database of patients who underwent colonoscopy at a single tertiary referral center between 2017 and 2023. Patients were excluded if the procedure was incomplete or aborted owing to poor preparation. The patients were categorized based on the use of AI during colonoscopy. Data on patient demographics and colonoscopy performance metrics were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare the groups.

RESULTS

After PSM patients with adequately prepped colonoscopies (n = 1466), the likelihood of detecting hyperplastic polyps (OR = 2.0, 95%CI 1.7-2.5, p < 0.001), adenomas (OR = 1.47, 95%CI 1.19-1.81, p < 0.001), and sessile serrated polyps (OR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.20-3.03, p = 0.007) significantly increased with the inclusion of CADe. In inadequately prepped patients (n = 160), CADe exhibited a more pronounced impact on the polyp detection rate (OR = 4.34, 95%CI 1.6-6.16, p = 0.049) and adenomas (OR = 2.9, 95%CI 2.20-8.57, p < 0.001), with a marginal increase in withdrawal and procedure times.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significant improvement in detecting diminutive polyps (< 5 mm) and sessile polyps using CADe, although notably, this benefit was only seen in patients with adequate bowel preparation. In conclusion, the integration of AI in colonoscopy, driven by artificial intelligence, promises to significantly enhance lesion detection and diagnosis, revolutionize the procedure's effectiveness, and improve patient outcomes.

Usefulness and safety of new ultrasmall-diameter colonoscope for cases with difficult insertion: a retrospective study

Colonoscopies are widely available, but there are cases where insertion can be difficult, even for experienced endoscopists. EC-760XP/L, a new ultrasmall-diameter long scope, may be useful in such cases. This single-center retrospective study included 39 cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult even when previously conducted by an experienced endoscopist. The primary outcome was the cecal intubation time using EC-760XP/L compared to the time used in a previous examination with a standard scope. The secondary outcomes were the cecum intubation rate, intestinal cleanliness level, adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, sedative use rate, occurrence of adverse events, and pain experience. A comparison of cecal intubation times between EC-760XP/L and the standard scope showed that insertion times were significantly lower with EC-760XP/L (9.5 min) compared to the standard scope (19 min) (p < 0.01). The standard scope achieved cecal intubation in 30 cases (76.9%), whereas EC-760XP/L reached the cecum in all cases (p < 0.01). Pain was observed in 3 cases (8.3%) with the EC-760XP/L, which was significantly lower than the 22 cases (56.4%) with the standard scope (p < 0.01). In conclusion, EC-760XP/L proved to be useful in cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult.

Endoscopic Artificial Intelligence for Image Analysis in Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) using deep learning systems has recently been utilized in various medical fields. In the field of gastroenterology, AI is primarily implemented in image recognition and utilized in the realm of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. In GI endoscopy, computer-aided detection/diagnosis (CAD) systems assist endoscopists in GI neoplasm detection or differentiation of cancerous or noncancerous lesions. Several AI systems for colorectal polyps have already been applied in colonoscopy clinical practices. In esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a few CAD systems for upper GI neoplasms have been launched in Asian countries. The usefulness of these CAD systems in GI endoscopy has been gradually elucidated.

SUMMARY

In this review, we outline recent articles on several studies of endoscopic AI systems for GI neoplasms, focusing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), gastric cancer (GC), and colorectal polyps. In ESCC and EAC, computer-aided detection (CADe) systems were mainly developed, and a recent meta-analysis study showed sensitivities of 91.2% and 93.1% and specificities of 80% and 86.9%, respectively. In GC, a recent meta-analysis study on CADe systems demonstrated that their sensitivity and specificity were as high as 90%. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) also showed that the use of the CADe system reduced the miss rate. Regarding computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems for GC, although RCTs have not yet been conducted, most studies have demonstrated expert-level performance. In colorectal polyps, multiple RCTs have shown the usefulness of the CADe system for improving the polyp detection rate, and several CADx systems have been shown to have high accuracy in colorectal polyp differentiation.

KEY MESSAGES

Most analyses of endoscopic AI systems suggested that their performance was better than that of nonexpert endoscopists and equivalent to that of expert endoscopists. Thus, endoscopic AI systems may be useful for reducing the risk of overlooking lesions and improving the diagnostic ability of endoscopists.

Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy

Diagnostic errors impact patient health and healthcare costs. Artificial Intelligence (AI) shows promise in mitigating this burden by supporting Medical Doctors in decision-making. However, the mere display of excellent or even superhuman performance by AI in specific tasks does not guarantee a positive impact on medical practice. Effective AI assistance should target the primary causes of human errors and foster effective collaborative decision-making with human experts who remain the ultimate decision-makers. In this narrative review, we apply these principles to the specific scenario of AI assistance during colonoscopy. By unraveling the neurocognitive foundations of the colonoscopy procedure, we identify multiple bottlenecks in perception, attention, and decision-making that contribute to diagnostic errors, shedding light on potential interventions to mitigate them. Furthermore, we explored how existing AI devices fare in clinical practice and whether they achieved an optimal integration with the human decision-maker. We argue that to foster optimal Human-AI collaboration, future research should expand our knowledge of factors influencing AI's impact, establish evidence-based cognitive models, and develop training programs based on them. These efforts will enhance human-AI collaboration, ultimately improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. The principles illuminated in this review hold more general value, extending their relevance to a wide array of medical procedures and beyond.

Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review

This scoping review of randomised controlled trials on artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice reveals an expanding interest in AI across clinical specialties and locations. The USA and China are leading in the number of trials, with a focus on deep learning systems for medical imaging, particularly in gastroenterology and radiology. A majority of trials (70 [81%] of 86) report positive primary endpoints, primarily related to diagnostic yield or performance; however, the predominance of single-centre trials, little demographic reporting, and varying reports of operational efficiency raise concerns about the generalisability and practicality of these results. Despite the promising outcomes, considering the likelihood of publication bias and the need for more comprehensive research including multicentre trials, diverse outcome measures, and improved reporting standards is crucial. Future AI trials should prioritise patient-relevant outcomes to fully understand AI's true effects and limitations in health care.

Detailed Superiority of the CAD EYE Artificial Intelligence System over Endoscopists for Lesion Detection and Characterization Using Unique Movie Sets

Objectives

Detailed superiority of CAD EYE (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan), an artificial intelligence for polyp detection/diagnosis, compared to endoscopists is not well examined. We examined endoscopist's ability using movie sets of colorectal lesions which were detected and diagnosed by CAD EYE accurately.

Methods

Consecutive lesions of ≤10 mm were examined live by CAD EYE from March-June 2022 in our institution. Short unique movie sets of each lesion with and without CAD EYE were recorded simultaneously using two recorders for detection under white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) and diagnosis under blue laser/light imaging (BLI). Excluding inappropriate movies, 100 lesions detected and diagnosed with CAD EYE accurately were evaluated. Movies without CAD EYE were evaluated first by three trainees and three experts. Subsequently, movies with CAD EYE were examined. The rates of accurate detection and diagnosis were evaluated for both movie sets.

Results

Among 100 lesions (mean size: 4.7±2.6 mm; 67 neoplastic/33 hyperplastic), mean accurate detection rates of movies without or with CAD EYE were 78.7%/96.7% under WLI (p<0.01) and 91.3%/97.3% under LCI (p<0.01) for trainees and 85.3%/99.0% under WLI (p<0.01) and 92.6%/99.3% under LCI (p<0.01) for experts. Mean accurate diagnosis rates of movies without or with CAD EYE for BLI were 85.3%/100% for trainees (p<0.01) and 92.3%/100% for experts (p<0.01), respectively. The significant risk factors of not-detected lesions for trainees were right-sided, hyperplastic, not-reddish, in the corner, halation, and inadequate bowel preparation.

Conclusions

Unique movie sets with and without CAD EYE could suggest it's efficacy for lesion detection/diagnosis.

Single Versus Second Observer vs Artificial Intelligence to Increase the ADENOMA Detection Rate of Colonoscopy-A Network Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Screening colonoscopy has significantly contributed to the reduction of the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its associated mortality, with adenoma detection rate (ADR) as the quality marker. To increase the ADR, various solutions have been proposed including the utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and employing second observers during colonoscopies. In the interest of AI improving ADR independently, without a second observer, and the operational similarity between AI and second observer, this network meta-analysis aims at evaluating the effectiveness of AI, second observer, and a single observer in improving ADR.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science Core Collection, Korean Citation Index, SciELO, Global Index Medicus, and Cochrane. A direct head-to-head comparator analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using the random-effects model. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We analyzed 26 studies, involving 22,560 subjects. In the direct comparative analysis, AI demonstrated higher ADR (OR: 0.668, 95% CI 0.595-0.749, p < 0.001) than single observer. Dual observer demonstrated a higher ADR (OR: 0.771, 95% CI 0.688-0.865, p < 0.001) than single operator. In network meta-analysis, results were consistent on the network meta-analysis, maintaining consistency. No statistical difference was noted when comparing AI to second observer. (RR 1.1 (0.9-1.2, p = 0.3). Results were consistent when evaluating only RCTs. Net ranking provided higher score to AI followed by second observer followed by single observer.

CONCLUSION

Artificial Intelligence and second-observer colonoscopy showed superior success in Adenoma Detection Rate when compared to single-observer colonoscopy. Although not statistically significant, net ranking model favors the superiority of AI to the second observer.

Artificial intelligence for colorectal neoplasia detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopy holds the potential to enhance adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and reduce adenoma miss rates (AMRs). However, varied outcomes have been observed across studies. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages of employing AI-aided systems during colonoscopy.

METHODS

Using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords, a comprehensive electronic literature search was performed of the Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library databases from the inception of each database until October 04, 2023, in order to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AI-assisted with standard colonoscopy for detecting colorectal neoplasia. Primary outcomes included AMR, ADR, and adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC). Secondary outcomes comprised the poly missed detection rate (PMR), poly detection rate (PDR), and poly detected per colonoscopy (PPC). We utilized random-effects meta-analyses with Hartung-Knapp adjustment to consolidate results. The prediction interval (PI) and I2 statistics were utilized to quantify between-study heterogeneity. Moreover, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity. This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023428658).

FINDINGS

This study encompassed 33 trials involving 27,404 patients. Those undergoing AI-aided colonoscopy experienced a significant decrease in PMR (RR, 0.475; 95% CI, 0.294-0.768; I2 = 87.49%) and AMR (RR, 0.495; 95% CI, 0.390-0.627; I2 = 48.76%). Additionally, a significant increase in PDR (RR, 1.238; 95% CI, 1.158-1.323; I2 = 81.67%) and ADR (RR, 1.242; 95% CI, 1.159-1.332; I2 = 78.87%), along with a significant increase in the rates of PPC (IRR, 1.388; 95% CI, 1.270-1.517; I2 = 91.99%) and APC (IRR, 1.390; 95% CI, 1.277-1.513; I2 = 86.24%), was observed. This resulted in 0.271 more PPCs (95% CI, 0.144-0.259; I2 = 65.61%) and 0.202 more APCs (95% CI, 0.144-0.259; I2 = 68.15%).

INTERPRETATION

AI-aided colonoscopy significantly enhanced the detection of colorectal neoplasia detection, likely by reducing the miss rate. However, future studies should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits of AI-aided colonoscopy in reducing cancer incidence.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LH2023H096), the Postdoctoral research project in Heilongjiang Province (LBH-Z22210), the National Natural Science Foundation of China's General Program (82072640) and the Outstanding Youth Project of Heilongjiang Natural Science Foundation (YQ2021H023).

Usefulness of AI-Equipped Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenoma during Colonoscopy Screening: Confirm That Colon Neoplasm Finely Can Be Identified by AI without Overlooking Study (Confidential Study)

In the present prospective case series study, we investigated the lesion-detection ability of an AI-equipped colonoscopy as an addition to colonoscopy (CS) screening. Participants were 100 patients aged ≥20 years who had not undergone CS at the study site in the last 3 years and passed the exclusion criteria. CS procedures were conducted using conventional white light imaging and computer-aided detection (CADe). Adenoma detection rate (ADR; number of individuals with at least one adenoma detected) was compared between the conventional group and the CADe group. Of the 170 lesions identified, the ADR of the CADe group was significantly higher than the ADR of the conventional group (69% vs. 61%, p = 0.008). For the expert endoscopists, although ADR did not differ significantly, the mean number of detected adenomas per procedure (MAP) was significantly higher in the CADe group than in the conventional group (1.7 vs. 1.45, p = 0.034). For non-expert endoscopists, ADR and MAP were significantly higher in the CADe group than in the conventional group (ADR 69.5% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.016; MAP 1.66 vs. 1.11, p < 0.001). These results indicate that the CADe function in CS screening has a positive effect on adenoma detection, especially for non-experts.