The 'ouR-HOPE' approach for ethics and communication about neonatal neurological injury

Parents' perspectives on conversations about prognosis and an assessment of prognostic information available online: A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Conversations about prognosis for genetic neurodevelopmental conditions are becoming more frequent; however, there is a lack of evidence and guidance on how to approach these conversations and frame the information being provided.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To understand how parents perceive prognostic conversations with healthcare professionals and their preferences for these conversations, (2) To investigate the framing of prognostic information found online.

METHODS

This was a mixed-methods study, comprising of (1) a thematic analysis of interviews with parents and (2) a quantification of prognostic information available on the internet that portrayed a negative message. The strategy to classify the framing of prognostic information was defined iteratively, informed by the information found online.

RESULTS

We interviewed 32 parents from across Australia. Parents had a child with a genetic neurodevelopmental condition, such as Fragile X syndrome (28 %), 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (16 %) or Angelman syndrome (16 %). Parents reported their preference to discuss their child's potential strengths as well as challenges regarding prognosis. They reported that conversations about prognosis often focused on the child's possible deficits and that online information they encountered was similarly framed negatively. Our analysis of online information confirmed parents accounts: 95.3 % was coded as negative, while only 4.7 % was positive/neutral.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide evidence of an over-emphasis of deficit-framed prognostic information about genetic neurodevelopmental conditions. The initial exposure to negative information may adversely affect parents' psychological well-being and expectations, which future research could address. Health professionals could consider strengths-based framing of prognostic information gained from current and emerging technologies when returning results to families. Findings from this study can help to inform health communication practices as well as online content development.

Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines

Clinicians may face an array of challenges in conducting fetal neurological consultations including prognostic uncertainty, a lack of training in fetal counseling, and limited opportunity to build rapport with families. In this setting, it is critical to employ high-quality, family-centered care to allow expectant parents to make informed decisions. Despite the challenges and gravity of these consultations, there remains limited data outlining best conduct and communication practices. This narrative review aims to summarize relevant literature around counseling within fetal neurology, focusing on three key themes: (1) discussing neurological prognosis and uncertainty, (2) navigating evolving decision making, (3) recognizing bias and understanding patient context. We provide practical recommendations to clinicians conducting fetal neurological counseling and outline future research priorities. IMPACT: Fetal neurological conditions can have a significant impact on child short- and long-term health outcomes. Prenatal consultations are an important venue to discuss information regarding fetal prognosis and decision making with expectant parents. However, there is limited evidence supporting best communication practices within this setting. This review summarizes current literature around expectant parent prognostic communication preferences and outlines practical recommendations and priorities for future research.

Predictors of Death or Severe Impairment in Neonates With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Importance

Outcomes after hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) are variable. Predicting death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in affected neonates is crucial for guiding management and parent communication.

Objective

To predict death or severe NDI in neonates who receive hypothermia for HIE.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prognostic study included participants enrolled in a large US clinical trial conducted in US neonatal intensive care units who were born between January 2017 and October 2019 and followed up to age 2 years. Eligible participants were neonates with moderate-severe HIE born at 36 weeks or more gestation and with 2-year outcome data. Data were analyzed June 2023. External validation was performed with a UK cohort.

Exposure

Clinical, electroencephalography (EEG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables were curated and examined at 24 hours and following cooling.

Main Outcome and Measures

Death or severe NDI at age 2 years. Severe NDI was defined as Bayley Scales of Infant Toddler Development cognitive score below 70, Gross Motor Function Classification System score of 3 or higher, or quadriparesis. Model performance metrics were derived from training, internal, and external validation datasets.

Results

Among 424 neonates (mean [SD] gestational age, 39.1 [1.4] weeks; 192 female [45.3%]; 28 Asian [6.6%], 50 Black [11.8%], 311 White [73.3%]), 105 (24.7%) had severe encephalopathy at enrollment. Overall, 59 (13.9%) died and 46 (10.8%) had severe NDI. In the 24-hour model, the combined presence of 3 clinical characteristics-(1) severely abnormal EEG, (2) pH level of 7.11 or below, and (3) 5-minute Apgar score of 0-had a specificity of 99.6% (95% CI, 97.5%-100%) and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.2% (95% CI, 73.2%-99.3%). Validation model metrics were 97.9% (95% CI, 92.7%-99.8%) for internal specificity, with a PPV of 77.8% (95% CI, 43.4%-94.1%), and 97.6% (95% CI, 95.1%-99.0%) for external specificity, with a PPV of 46.2% (95% CI, 23.3%-70.8%). In the postcooling model, specificity for T1, T2, or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) abnormality in at least 2 of 3 deep gray regions (ie, thalamus, caudate, putamen and/or globus pallidus) plus a severely abnormal EEG within the first 24 hours was 99.1% (95% CI, 96.8%-99.9%), with a PPV of 91.7% (95% CI, 72.8%-97.8%). Internal specificity in this model was 98.9% (95% CI, 94.1%-100%), with a PPV of 92.9% (95% CI, 64.2%-99.0%); external specificity was 98.6% (95% CI, 96.5%-99.6%), with a PPV of 83.3% (95% CI, 64.1%-93.4%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prognostic study of neonates with moderate or severe HIE who were treated with therapeutic hypothermia, simple models using readily available clinical, EEG, and MRI results during the hospital admission had high specificity and PPV for death or severe NDI at age 2 years.

Meaningful and Successful Ethical Enactments: A Proposal from Deliberative Wisdom Theory

As a field, ethics is driven by the desire to help guide human life and human activities. Yet, what are the standards or guideposts indicating that a given policy or practice change actually contributes meaningfully to such desires and aspirations? In other words, how do we know if we have achieved meaningful ethical outcomes and enactment processes? Unfortunately, there are many examples of ethically oriented actions that were well intentioned but carried out in a way that undermined some of the values they intended on promoting or led to unexpected undesirable outcomes. In this paper, building on an account of ethics as a pragmatist pursuit of deliberative wisdom, I identify and discuss four procedural guideposts which can help evaluate if a process of inquiry is an ethical one oriented toward human flourishing. First, situational awareness and continuity designates the need to keep in sight the nature of the situation at stake to ensure that the enactment process does not derail from a cardinal human flourishing orientation. Second, a meaningful ethical enactment should distribute opportunities for participation such that it is not only one's autonomy (e.g., the ethicist) that is developed and exercised but that positive relationships are also fostered through the growth of others. Third, enactments must strive for more than simple avoidance of encroachment of wrongs but aim for the promotion of praiseworthy practices that pursue what is envisioned as being the better and most compelling vision. Fourth, an ethics process should be conducive of personal growth and mutual learning.

Supporting parents' emotional and mental health in the antenatal consultation

Supporting parents' emotional and mental health is crucial during antenatal consultations, in which expectant parents often receive serious news about their infant and sometimes face complex antenatal or postnatal decision-making. Being considerate of the circumstances to mitigate barriers and stressors, utilizing clear and sensitive language, and personalizing counseling and decision-making to support parents' pluralistic values are strategies that individual neonatologists can use to promote parents' mental wellness in these encounters. Partnership with clinicians of other disciplines and professions in antenatal consultations can help in providing additional medical information and parent support; however, care must be coordinated within the team to ensure that confusing or conflicting counseling is avoided. In addition to improving communication skills for these encounters as individuals and teams, opportunities also exist to enhance support of parents' mental health at the institutional and national level.

Pediatric Neuropalliative Medicine

Neurological disease in childhood has significant impacts on not only physical well-being, but also on the social, environmental, and emotional health of the child, their family, and the larger community. Pediatric neuropalliative medicine is a recently developed area of subspecialty practice that supports families affected by serious neurological illness in navigating uncertain illness trajectories, refractory symptoms, and the myriad medical decisions that arise over the life of the child. Despite their medical needs, children with neurological diseases live full, joyful, and connected lives with their families, many of whom also experience personal growth and find meaning in their caregiving. Patients and families under the care of neurologists also face many systemic and interpersonal biases, both within the health care system and in the community, and encounter frequent gaps in their home and community-based supports. This chapter summarizes what is known about pediatric neuropalliative medicine and highlights the future research, educational, and clinical innovations that are needed to build more comprehensive and well-prepared systems to address unmet needs. Particularly in the modern era of child neurology practice where disease-modifying treatments are becoming increasingly available, pediatric neuropalliative medicine is an essential area of subspecialty practice that helps to support the personhood and quality of life of the individuals affected by serious illness and their families. As medicine helps more and more children with neurological impairment survive, medical treatment must include not only treatment for the physical body, but also care and support for the complexity of human experience of living with serious illness.

Communicating with Parents About Therapeutic Hypothermia and Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: Integrating a Palliative Care Approach into Practice

Parents of newborns with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) can face communication challenges in the neonatal intensive care unit. Both specialty palliative care and primary palliative care trained clinicians can assist parents as they navigate traumatic experiences and uncertain prognoses. Using evidence-based frameworks, the authors provide samples of how to communicate with parents and promote parent well-being across the care trajectory. The authors demonstrate how to involve parents in a shared decision-making process and give special consideration to the complexities of hospital discharge and the transition home. Sustained investment to guide the development of effective communication skills is crucial to support families of infants with HIE.

Parental impact during and after neonatal intensive care admission

Parents play a pivotal role in neurodevelopmental outcomes of their children in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and beyond. Integration of parents in clinical care and research is synergistic. Engaged parents yield more comprehensive clinical care and more robust and meaningful research products. Subsequently, successful clinical and research efforts improve outcomes for children. We review strategies for parental integration into NICU clinical care and research, including parental involvement in therapeutic interventions and neurodevelopmental care, and effective communication strategies for clinicians and researchers. We discuss challenges in neonatal trials and emphasize the need for building a culture of research, collaborative partnerships with patient advocacy organizations, and ongoing support beyond the NICU. Overall, we call for recognizing and fostering the impactful role of parents as teammates with clinicians and researchers in optimizing neurodevelopmental outcomes in the NICU and beyond.

Living ethics: a stance and its implications in health ethics

Moral or ethical questions are vital because they affect our daily lives: what is the best choice we can make, the best action to take in a given situation, and ultimately, the best way to live our lives? Health ethics has contributed to moving ethics toward a more experience-based and user-oriented theoretical and methodological stance but remains in our practice an incomplete lever for human development and flourishing. This context led us to envision and develop the stance of a "living ethics", described in this inaugural collective and programmatic paper as an effort to consolidate creative collaboration between a wide array of stakeholders. We engaged in a participatory discussion and collective writing process known as instrumentalist concept analysis. This process included initial local consultations, an exploratory literature review, the constitution of a working group of 21 co-authors, and 8 workshops supporting a collaborative thinking and writing process. First, a living ethics designates a stance attentive to human experience and the role played by morality in human existence. Second, a living ethics represents an ongoing effort to interrogate and scrutinize our moral experiences to facilitate adaptation of people and contexts. It promotes the active and inclusive engagement of both individuals and communities in envisioning and enacting scenarios which correspond to their flourishing as authentic ethical agents. Living ethics encourages meaningful participation of stakeholders because moral questions touch deeply upon who we are and who we want to be. We explain various aspects of a living ethics stance, including its theoretical, methodological, and practical implications as well as some barriers to its enactment based on the reflections resulting from the collaborative thinking and writing process.

Training in neonatal neurocritical care: A case-based interdisciplinary approach

Interdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology (FNN) training strengthens neonatal neurocritical care (NNCC) clinical decisions. Neonatal neurological phenotypes require immediate followed by sustained neuroprotective care path choices through discharge. Serial assessments during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) rounds are supplemented by family conferences and didactic interactions. These encounters collectively contribute to optimal interventions yielding more accurate outcome predictions. Maternal-placental-fetal (MPF) triad disease pathways influence postnatal medical complications which potentially reduce effective interventions and negatively impact outcome. The science of uncertainty regarding each neonate's clinical status must consider timing and etiologies that are responsible for fetal and neonatal brain disorders. Shared clinical decisions among all stakeholders' balance "fast" (heuristic) and "slow" (analytic) thinking as more information is assessed regarding etiopathogenetic effects that impair the developmental neuroplasticity process. Two case vignettes stress the importance of FNN perspectives during NNCC that integrates this dual cognitive approach. Clinical care paths evaluations are discussed for an encephalopathic extremely preterm and full-term newborn. Recognition of cognitive errors followed by debiasing strategies can improve clinical decisions during NICU care. Re-evaluations with serial assessments of examination, imaging, placental-cord, and metabolic-genetic information improve clinical decisions that maintain accuracy for interventions and outcome predictions. Discharge planning includes shared decisions among all stakeholders when coordinating primary care, pediatric subspecialty, and early intervention participation. Prioritizing social determinants of healthcare during FNN training strengthens equitable career long NNCC clinical practice, education, and research goals. These perspectives contribute to a life course brain health capital strategy that will benefit all persons across each and successive lifespans.

Pediatric palliative care in Canada

Pediatric palliative care (PPC) emerged during the late 20th century in Canada. It has steadily expanded and there are now programs in every province. Programs adhere to recognized standards of practice at both federal and provincial levels. PPC is recognized by government regulatory bodies and professional associations, including the Canadian Paediatric Society.

Prognostic Discordance Among Parents and Physicians Caring for Infants with Neurologic Conditions

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency, degree, and nature of prognostic discordance between parents and physicians caring for infants with neurologic conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

In this observational cohort study, we enrolled parents and physicians caring for infants with neurologic conditions in advance of a family conference. Parent-physician dyads completed a postconference survey targeting expected neurologic outcomes across 3 domains (motor, speech, and cognition) using a 6-point scale. Prognostic discordance was defined as a difference of ≥2 response options and was considered moderate (difference of 2-3 response options) or high (difference of 4-5 response options). Responses were categorized as differences in belief and/or differences in understanding using an existing paradigm.

RESULTS

Forty parent-physician dyads of 28 infants completed surveys. Parent-physician discordance about prognosis occurred in ≥1 domain in the majority of dyads (n = 28/40, 70%). Discordance was generally moderate in degree (n = 23/28, 82%) and occurred with similar frequency across all domains. Of parent-physician dyads with discordance, the majority contained a difference in understanding in at least 1 domain (n = 25/28, 89%), while a minority contained a difference of belief (n = 6/28, 21%). When discordance was present, parents were typically more optimistic in their predictions compared with physicians (n = 25/28, 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

Differing perceptions about the prognosis of critically ill infants are common and due to differences in both understanding and belief. These findings can be used to develop targeted interventions to improve prognostic communication.

Long-term developmental condition following neonatal arterial ischemic stroke: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS) is the most frequent subtype of perinatal stroke. Its elusive pathophysiology, its abrupt and unexpected occurrence, and the uncertainty of the post-NAIS developmental condition may lead to parental emotional distress and psychological difficulties. The aim of this study was to summarize the current data on long-term developmental conditions following NAIS to support parental information given within the neonatal unit.

METHODS

This systematic review included clinical studies of term infants with NAIS, who had a developmental assessment at ≥5 years of age. Studies were identified from the Medline and Embase databases on June 1, 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results were synthesized using a narrative approach. The 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed to report this work.

RESULTS

Three cohort studies enrolling 205 children assessed from 5 to 7 years after NAIS were included. Most of the children presented long-term developmental conditions allowing them to be integrated into a regular school program, to participate in physical activities, and to have a good quality of life. Global intellectual deficiency and moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy occurred in less than 10% of the children.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should not overestimate the incidence of moderate-to-severe developmental outcome following NAIS when discussing the prognosis with parents. A parental information sheet about NAIS and its long-term developmental conditions is provided.

The ALIGN Framework: A Parent-Informed Approach to Prognostic Communication for Infants With Neurologic Conditions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinicians often communicate complex, uncertain, and distressing information about neurologic prognosis to parents of critically ill infants. Although communication tools have been developed in other disciplines and settings, none address the unique needs of the neonatal and pediatric neurology context. We aimed to develop a parent-informed framework to guide clinicians in communicating information about neurologic prognosis.

METHODS

Parents of infants with neurologic conditions in the intensive care unit were enrolled in a longitudinal study of shared decision-making from 2018 to 2020. Parents completed semistructured interviews following recorded family meetings with the health care team, at hospital discharge, and 6 months after discharge. All interviews targeted information about parent preferences for prognostic disclosure. We analyzed the data using a conventional content analysis approach. Two study team members independently coded all interview transcripts, and discrepancies were resolved in consensus. We used NVIVO 12 qualitative software to index and organize codes.

RESULTS

Fifty-two parents of 37 infants completed 123 interviews. Parents were predominantly mothers (n = 37/52, 71%) with a median age of 31 (range 19-46) years. Half were Black (n = 26/52, 50%), and a minority reported Hispanic ethnicity (n = 2/52, 4%). Inductive analysis resulted in the emergence of 5 phases of prognostic communication (Approach, Learn, Inform, Give support, and Next steps: ALIGN): (1) Approach: parents appreciated receiving consistent information about their child's neurologic outcome from clinicians who knew their child well. (2) Learn: parents valued when clinicians asked them how they preferred receiving information and what they already knew about their child's outcome prior to information delivery. (3) Inform: parents valued honest, thorough, and balanced information that disclosed prognostic uncertainty and acknowledged room for hope. (4) Give support: parents valued empathic communication and appreciated clinicians who offered real-time emotional support. (5) Next steps: parents appreciated clinicians who connected them to resources, including peer support.

DISCUSSION

The ALIGN framework offers a novel, parent-informed strategy to effectively communicate neurologic prognosis. Although ALIGN represents key elements of a conversation about prognosis, each clinician can adapt this framework to their own approach. Future work will assess the effectiveness of this framework on communication quality and prognostic understanding.

Neonatal neuropalliative care

Neonatal neuropalliative care is directed toward patients and families impacted by serious, life limiting, or debilitating neurologic illness in the antenatal and newborn period. This chapter will outline key considerations for clinicians hoping to provide a neuropalliative care approach antenatally, at birth, and in the neonatal intensive care unit. We focus on three core domains: (1) family-centered communication and care, (2) prognostication and decision-making, and (3) pain and symptom management. In each domain, we outline key considerations in the antenatal period, at birth, and in the neonatal intensive care unit. We also address special considerations in care at the end of life and in varied cultural and practice contexts. We conclude with suggestions for future research and key considerations for neonatal clinicians who wish to incorporate a neuropalliative approach to care into their practice.

Discussing brain magnetic resonance imaging results for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with hypothermia: A challenge for clinicians and parents

Context

Clinicians use brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to discuss neurodevelopmental prognosis with parents of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH).

Purpose

To investigate how clinicians and parents discuss these MRI results in the context of HIE and TH and how these discussions could be facilitated and more meaningful for parents.

Procedures

Mixed-methods surveys with open-ended and closed-ended questions were completed by two independent groups. (1) Clinicians responded to clinical vignettes of neonates with HIE treated with TH with various types of clinical features, evolution and extent of brain injury and questions about how they discuss brain MRI results in this context. (2) Parents of children with HIE treated with TH responded to questions about the discussion of MRI that they had while still in the neonatal intensive care unit and were asked to place it in perspective with the outcomes of their child when he/she reached at least 2 years of age. Open-ended responses were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Closed-ended responses are presented descriptively.

Results

Clinicians reported uncertainty, lack of confidence, and limitations when discussing brain MRI results in the context of HIE and TH. Brain MRI results were "usually" (53%) used in the prognostication discussion. When dealing with day-2 brain MRIs performed during TH, most clinicians (40%) assumed that the results of these early MRIs were only "sometimes" accurate and only used them "sometimes" (33%) to discuss prognosis; a majority of them (66%) would "always" repeat imaging at a later time-point to discuss prognosis. Parents also struggled with this uncertainty, but did not discuss limitations of MRI as often. Parents raised the importance of the setting where the discussion took place and the importance to inform them as quickly as possible. Clinicians identified strategies to improve these discussions, including interdisciplinary approach, formal training, and standardized approach to report brain MRI. Parents highlighted the importance of communication skills, the stress, the hope surrounding their situation, and the need to receive answers as soon as possible. The importance of showing the pictures or making representative drawing of the injury, but also highlighting the not-injured brain, was also highlighted by parents.

Conclusions

Discussing brain MRI results for neonates with HIE treated with TH are challenging tasks for clinicians and daunting moments for parents.

Prognostic Discussion for Infants with Neurologic Conditions: Qualitative Analysis of Family Conferences

OBJECTIVE

We characterize the content and role of prognostic discussion for infants with neurologic conditions.

METHODS

In this descriptive qualitative study, we prospectively enrolled infants (age < 1 year) in the intensive care unit with a neurologic condition anticipated to have ≥1 family conference about prognosis or goals of care. We audiorecorded family conferences as they occurred. We used a rapid-cycle qualitative approach to identify and refine themes.

RESULTS

Forty infants and 61 parents were enrolled; 68 family conferences occurred for 24 infants. The majority of infant cases (n = 23/24, 96%) and conferences (n = 64/68, 94%) included discussion of neurologic prognosis. Common infant diagnoses included prematurity (n = 12, 52%), genetic conditions (n = 9, 35%), and brain malformations (n = 7, 30%). We identified 2 themes relating to the characterization of the infant's prognosis: (1) predictions of impairment and (2) rationale for prognostic predictions. We identified 3 themes characterizing the role of prognostic discussion: (1) aligning parent and clinician understanding of infant outcome, (2) influencing decision-making, and (3) preparing for life at home. We identified 2 themes characterizing discussion of prognostic uncertainty: (1) multilayered types of uncertainty and (2) holding space for hope alongside uncertainty.

INTERPRETATION

In this cohort of infants with neurologic conditions and their parents, we identified salient themes characterizing the content and role of discussion about neurologic outcome. Our findings highlight that prognostic discussion focuses on anticipated impairments, informs decision-making, and helps families prepare for home life. Future work should characterize whether these findings align with parent preferences for prognostic disclosure. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:699-709.

Ethical considerations in the management of infants with severe intraventricular hemorrhage

Intrinsic and extrinsic factors unique to neonatal care can complicate predictions of neurological outcomes for infants who suffer from severe intraventricular hemorrhage. While care decisions are driven by the same bioethical principles used in other domains, neurological prognostication can challenge concepts of futility, require careful examination of parental values, uncover biases and/or potentially compromise the best interests of the future child. In the following chapter we will review bioethical principles and relevant concepts, explore challenges to decision-making surrounding diagnoses of severe intraventricular hemorrhage and conclude with a brief review of practical approaches for counseling parents about neurodevelopmental impairment given the constraints of prognostic uncertainty and assumptions related to quality of life. We will argue that neurological findings alone, even in the setting of severe intraventricular hemorrhage, often do not constitute enough evidence for redirection of care but can be permissible when the entire neonatal condition is considered.

Factors Influencing Physician Prognosis: A Scoping Review

Introduction. Prognosis is an essential component of informed consent for medical decision making. Research shows that physicians display discrepancies in their prognostication, leading to variable, inaccurate, optimistic, or pessimistic prognosis. Factors driving these discrepancies and the supporting evidence have not been reviewed systematically. Methods. We undertook a scoping review to explore the literature on the factors leading to discrepancies in medical prognosis. We searched Medline (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1970 to 2017. We included articles that discussed prognosis variation or discrepancy and where factors influencing prognosis were evaluated. We extracted data outlining the participants, methodology, and prognosis discrepancy information and measured factors influencing prognosis. Results. Of 4,723 articles, 73 were included in the final analysis. There was significant variability in research methodologies. Most articles showed that physicians were pessimistic regarding patient outcomes, particularly in early trainees and acute care specialties. Accuracy rates were similar across all time periods. Factors influencing prognosis were clustered in 4 categories: patient-related factors (such as age, gender, race, diagnosis), physician-related factors (such as age, race, gender, specialty, training and experience, attitudes and values), clinical situation-related factors (such as physician-patient relationship, patient location, and clinical context), and environmental-related factors (such as country or hospital size). Discussion. Obtaining accurate prognostic information is one of the highest priorities for seriously ill patients. The literature shows trends toward pessimism, especially in early trainees and acute care specialties. While some factors may prove difficult to change, the physician's personality and psychology influence prognosis accuracy and could be tackled using debiasing strategies. Exposure to long-term patient outcomes and a multidisciplinary practice setting are environmental debiasing strategies that may warrant further research.

Highlights

Literature on discrepancies in physician's prognostication is heterogeneous and sparse.Literature shows that physicians are mostly pessimistic regarding patient outcomes.Literature shows that a physician's personality and psychology influence prognostic accuracy and could be improved with evidence-based debiasing strategies.Medical specialty strongly influences prognosis, with specialties exposed to acutely ill patients being more pessimistic, whereas specialties following patients longitudinally being more optimistic.Physicians early in their training were more pessimist than more experienced physicians.

A Neurologist's Guide to Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Assessments and Preterm Brain Injury

Despite advances in medical care and improved survival of extremely preterm infants, rates of neurodevelopmental impairment remain high. Outcomes are significantly improved with early intervention, but infants must be appropriately identified to facilitate services. Neuroimaging provides important information regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes but prognosticating and communicating risk remains challenging. Standardized neonatal neurodevelopmental assessments provide supplemental information to aid in the identification of high-risk infants and counseling for their families.

Personalized support of parents of extremely preterm infants before, during and after birth

The emotional turmoil associated with extremely preterm birth is inescapable parents. How each parent handles the unexpected, makes sense of the unknown and learns to parent their child is uniquely personal. A rigid standardized approach to support families through their journey before and during neonatal intensive care disregards this individuality. This article reviews general concepts and practices that can be learned and applied by clinicians to promote resiliency and help parents cope adaptively. This review will describe how to personalize parenting support during the antenatal consultation and hospitalization for parents of extremely premature infants. To facilitate this, mindsets and care delivery models need to shift from inflexible standardized protocols to flexible guidelines that enable personalized communications, support structures and care delivery models tailored to each person's characteristics, preferences, and values.

Grappling with uncertainty - Experiences of parents of infants following perinatal stroke

BACKGROUND

The term perinatal stroke describes focal damage to the developing brain due to cerebrovascular disease and occurring either before or shortly after birth. Aetiology, presentation and evolution differ from stroke in adults.

AIMS

We aimed to explore early parental experiences related to having a child with perinatal stroke, including how parental psychological wellbeing had been impacted, to consider how support for families could be improved.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

We undertook a qualitative research study, using in-depth interviews of parents of infants with perinatal stroke when the infants were 5-6 months corrected gestational age. Sixteen parents (11 female, 5 male) of 11 infants with perinatal stroke took part. Thematic analysis was used in data interpretation.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Parents described distress related to the lack of information regarding likely outcome following perinatal stroke, as well as confusion around the term 'stroke'. Guilt and self-blame were expressed, with increased emotional sensitivity. Seeking information about stroke to reduce uncertainty was a useful strategy for some, but overwhelming for others.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The diagnosis of perinatal stroke led to psychological distress in parents. Uncertainty following diagnosis produced significant emotional difficulties. Recommendations for practice include providing timely, paced information and psychological support.

Personalized communication with parents of children born at less than 25 weeks: Moving from doctor-driven to parent-personalized discussions

Communication with parents is an essential component of neonatal care. For extremely preterm infants born at less than 25 weeks, this process is complicated by the substantial risk of mortality or major morbidity. For some babies with specific prognostic factors, the majority die. Although many of these deaths occur after admission to the intensive care unit, position statements have focused on communication during the prenatal consultation. This review takes a more comprehensive approach and covers personalized and parent-centered communication in the clinical setting during three distinct yet inter-related phases: the antenatal consultation, the neonatal intensive care hospitalization, and the dying process (when this happens). We advocate that a 'one-size-fits-all' communication model focused on standardizing information does not lead to partnerships. It is possible to standardize personalized approaches that recognize and adapt to parental heterogeneity. This can help clinicians and parents build effective partnerships of trust and affective support to engage in personalized decision-making. These practices begin with self-reflection on the part of the clinician and continue with practical frameworks and stepwise approaches supporting personalization and parent-centered communication.

Conflicts between parents and clinicians: Tracheotomy decisions and clinical bioethics consultation

Background:

The parent of a child with profound cognitive disability will have complex decisions to consider throughout the life of their child. An especially complex decision is whether to place a tracheotomy to support the child’s airway. The decision may involve the parent wanting a tracheotomy and the clinician advising against this intervention or the clinician recommending a tracheotomy while the parent is opposed to the intervention. This conflict over what is best for the child may lead to a bioethics consult.

Objective:

The study explores the conflicts that may arise around tracheotomy placements.

Research design:

This study is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients for whom a tracheotomy decision required a bioethics consult.

Participants and research context:

Pediatric patients aged birth to 18 years old with a bioethics consult for a tracheotomy decision conflict between April 2010 and December 2016. A standardized data collection tool was used to review notes entered by the palliative care team, social workers, primary clinical team interim summaries, and the bioethics consult service.

Ethical considerations:

The study was reviewed and approved by the medical center’s institutional review board.

Results:

There were 248 clinical bioethics consults during the identified study period. There were 31 consults involving 21 children where the word tracheotomy was mentioned in the consult, and 13 of the 21 consults were for children with profound cognitive disability.

Discussion and conclusion:

Clinicians need to be aware of their own biases when discussing a child’s prognosis and treatment options while also understanding the parents’ values and what the parent might consider to be burdensome in the care of their child and the acceptable burden for the child to experience.

Counseling parents of premature neonates on neuroimaging findings

While medical advancements have led to improved survival of extremely premature infants, children remain at risk for brain injury and neurodevelopmental impairment. Brain imaging can offer insight into an infant's acute and long-term outcome; however, counseling parents about the results and implications of brain imaging remains challenging. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature and describe the challenges associated with counseling families of premature infants on neuroimaging findings. We propose a framework to guide clinicians in counseling parents about brain imaging results, informed by best practices in other disciplines: (FIGURE): 1) Formulate a plan 2) Identify parental needs and values 3) Give information 4) Acknowledge Uncertainty 5) Recognize and Respond to emotions 6) Discuss Expectations and Establish follow-up.

Ethical considerations in the care of encephalopathic neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia

Engaging with ethical issues is central to the management of neonatal encephalopathy (NE). As treatment for these neonates evolves, new ethical issues will arise and many existing challenges will remain. We highlight three key ethical issues that arise in the care of neonates with NE treated with therapeutic hypothermia: facilitating shared decision making, understanding futility, and defining the boundaries between standard of care and research. Awareness of these issues will help clinicians counsel families in light of evolving treatments and outcomes.

Neuropalliative Care for Neonates

Many childhood neurologic conditions are first diagnosed in the perinatal period and shorten or seriously alter the lives of affected infants. Neonatal neuropalliative care incorporates core practices and teachings of both neurology and palliative care and is directed toward patients and families affected by serious neurologic conditions in the antenatal and immediate newborn period. This review outlines key considerations for neurologists hoping to provide a neuropalliative care approach antenatally, in the neonatal intensive care unit, and around hospital discharge. We explore 4 core domains of neuropalliative care: (1) family-centered communication, (2) prognostication, (3) decision making, and (4) pain and symptom management. We address special considerations in care at the end of life and in varied cultural and practice contexts.

Recognition, identification, and diagnosis announcement of neonatal arterial ischemic stroke: A combined exploratory quantitative and qualitative study on parents' lived experiences

OBJECTIVES

To examine the epidemiology of neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS) and the chronology of care from early reported manifestations to formal diagnosis obtained by imaging. To explore how parents experienced the sequence of events, their own perception of potential diagnostic delay, diagnosis announcement, and prognosis discussion, and their current view of their child's quality of life.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of all NAIS cases that have been treated in our institution. Quantitative data came from both newborns' and mothers' medical records. Qualitative data were collected from parents in semi-structured interviews based on a standardized questionnaire composed of open-ended questions.

RESULTS

A total of 14 neonates were treated for NAIS in our institution between January 2008 and December 2017. The incidence of NAIS during this period was one out of 4258 births. The majority of neonates presented within 48 hours with a mean of 27h after birth, most often in the form of repetitive focal clonus (13/14). The mean time before diagnosis consideration and confirmation was 5 and 33h, respectively. Late consideration of early reported symptoms was identified as the main source of delay. Despite good reported health outcome, NAIS was associated with significant acute and long-standing parental emotional stress.

CONCLUSION

Maternity hospital caregivers' awareness of NAIS is crucial to reach early diagnosis. Improving this aspect would not only allow better early management, but also make it possible to set up acute neuroprotective strategies. Clinicians should be attentive to the modalities of diagnosis and prognosis announcements, which are associated with considerable stress and misconceptions.

Neonatal Central Nervous System Tumors

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors, including brain and spinal cord tumors, are the most common solid tumors of childhood. Within the neonatal population, however, CNS tumors are relatively rare. These often carry a dismal prognosis in part due to the limited therapeutic options available for newborns and the unique biology of these tumors compared with those seen in older infants and children. This article reviews neonatal CNS tumors, specifically their clinical presentation, imaging findings, treatment, prognosis, and associated genetic syndromes. The unique psychosocial and emotional challenges facing clinicians and families are discussed as well.

Death after Birth Asphyxia in the Cooling Era

In asphyxiated newborn infants treated with hypothermia, 31 of 50 (62%) deaths occurred in unstable infants electively extubated before completing hypothermia treatment. Later deaths occurred after consultation with palliative care (13/19) or clinical ethics (6/19) services, suggesting these decisions were challenging and required support, particularly if nutrition and hydration were withdrawn (n = 4).

The Response to Stress Questionnaire for Parents Following Neonatal Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

The Response to Stress Questionnaire-Brain Injury (RSQ-BI) was adapted utilizing a patient-oriented approach, exploring parental stress, coping, and associated mental health outcomes in parents of children with neonatal brain injury. The contributions of social risk, child adaptive functioning, and brain injury severity were also explored.

METHODS

Using a mixed-method design, this study explored adapted stressor items on the RSQ-BI. Parents and clinicians engaged in semistructured interviews to examine key stressors specific to being a parent of a child with neonatal brain injury. The adapted RSQ-BI was piloted in a parent sample (N = 77, child mean age 1 year 7 months) with established questionnaires of social risk, child adaptive functioning, severity of the child's injury, coping style, and parent mental health. Descriptive statistics and correlations examined parent stress, coping, and their association with parent mental health.

RESULTS

The final RSQ-BI questionnaire included 15 stressors. Factor analysis showed stressors loaded onto two factors related to (a) daily role stressors and (b) brain injury stressors. Using the RSQ-BI, parents reported brain injury stressors as more stressful than daily role stressors. When faced with these stressors, parents were most likely to engage in acceptance-based coping strategies and demonstrated lower symptoms of parent depression and anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

The RSQ-BI provides a valuable adaptation to understand both stressors and coping specific to being a parent of a child with neonatal brain injury. Relevant interventions that promote similar coping techniques are discussed for future care and research.

Parent experiences and developmental outcomes following neonatal stroke

OBJECTIVE

Parents of children with neonatal stroke offer critical insight into potential avenues to direct neuropsychological care from the time of diagnosis through the early years. The aims of this study were to (1) describe what parents remember about early prognostic discussions with the medical team and (2) to examine the relationships between initial prognoses and the child's current neurodevelopmental status and parents' mental health. Method: Thirty parents of children with neonatal stroke completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) and Parent Experiences Questionnaire (PEQ). The children of these parents were also seen for neurodevelopmental/neuropsychological assessments. Results: Parents recalled discussions with the medical team about motor, language, cognitive, and academic outcomes, with fewer discussions about the impact of neonatal stroke on their child's social skills, behavior, attention, mental health, and adaptive functioning. Many parents recalled poor initial prognoses following their child's diagnosis, with better than expected outcomes 3 years later. Parent self-reported depression, anxiety, and stress were associated with higher ratings of externalizing symptoms in their child. There were no significant correlations between parent mental health and their perception of their child's internalizing symptoms, neurodevelopmental functioning, or any of the child's medical/demographic factors. Conclusions: This study highlights the role of the neuropsychologist in the child's care in educating families and monitoring outcomes, emphasizes mental health support for parents of children with a history of neonatal stroke, and reiterates how environmental factors outside of the neonatal stroke itself can impact the child's functioning.

Communication between neonatologists and parents when prognosis is uncertain

OBJECTIVE

When an infant's prognosis is uncertain, communication between neonatologists and parents surrounding goals of care and decision-making can be challenging. This qualitative study explored communication between neonatologists and parents to discover qualities which may enhance or impede parent-clinician partnership under such difficult circumstances.

STUDY DESIGN

Guided by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Patient Centered Communication framework, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted and analyzed regarding neonatologist and parent perceptions of their communication. Subjects consisted of nine dyads of neonatologists and English-speaking parents whose infant had an uncertain prognosis.

RESULTS

Parents were overall satisfied with neonatologists' communications concerning their infant's uncertain trajectory. Nonetheless, both experienced challenges and distress during communication, impeding collaboration and engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Families and neonatologists value principles of patient centered communication but report challenges implementing this practice. Incorporating a multidisciplinary approach in settings of prognostic uncertainty to foster patient centered communication, may enhance communication surrounding NICU care.

Decision aids available for parents making end-of-life or palliative care decisions for children: A scoping review

AIM

To identify and assess the quality of decision aids that align the decision, values and information provided for parents making end-of-life or palliative care decisions for children with life-threatening conditions.

METHODS

Six databases and the grey literature were searched in December 2018. Two reviewers independently reviewed database citations, and one reviewed grey literature citations. Citation chaining via Scopus was conducted. Quality was assessed using IPDAS Collaboration Criteria.

RESULTS

After reviewing 18 671 database citations and 10 988 grey literature citations, 18 citations describing 11 decision aids remained. Decision aids targeted premature infants, children requiring airway management, children with cancer and children with scoliosis. Three aids underwent testing beyond initial development. Quality scores averaged 27 of 50 points.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few high-quality decision aids available for use and a lack evidence of widespread clinical use. Additional research is needed to support systematic development and the use of decision aids with families.

Paediatric palliative care in practice: Perspectives between acute and long-term healthcare teams

AIM

To explore and compare acute and long-term care professionals' perspectives about paediatric palliative care.

METHODS

Focus group interviews were conducted in 2016-2017 with professionals from acute (Emergency Department, Intensive Care Unit) and long-term care (Complex Care Service, Palliative Care) teams.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight participants were enrolled. Palliative care definitions were similar throughout groups: to provide active care early in the illness, focusing on the child as a whole and supporting families. Each group perceived a different role in the patient's illness trajectory, reflecting their own culture of care. They demonstrated important differences in their approach to palliative care. Disagreements regarding when or how to discuss goals of care were expressed. Acute care professionals reported discomfort when having to introduce these discussions for the first time, while long-term care professionals perceived negative judgements about their patients' quality of life by acute care teams during health events. Personalised care, communication with families and continuity of care were thought to be key elements to improve care.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric palliative care is well recognised throughout specialties, yet continuity of care is challenged by groups' roles and interventions in a patient's illness. A reflective and mutual clinical approach is needed to improve quality of care and professionals' satisfaction.

Exploring Ethical Issues Related to Patient Engagement in Healthcare: Patient, Clinician and Researcher's Perspectives

Patient engagement in healthcare is increasingly discussed in the literature, and initiatives engaging patients in quality improvement activities, organizational design, governance, and research are becoming more and more common and have even become mandatory for certain health institutions. Here we discuss a number of ethical challenges raised by this engagement from patients from the perspectives of research, organizational/quality improvement practices, and patient experiences, while offering preliminary recommendations as to how to address them. We identified three broad categories of ethical issues that intersect between the different types of patient engagement: (1) establishing a shared vision about goals of patient engagement and respective roles; (2) the process and method of engaging with patients; and (3) practical aspects of patient engagement. To explain these issues, we build from our personal, professional, and academic experiences, as well as traditions such as pragmatism and hermeneutics that stress the importance of participation, empowerment, and engagement.  Patient engagement can be highly valuable at numerous levels, but particular attention should be paid to the process of engaging with patients and related ethical issues. Some lessons from the literature on the ethics of participatory research can be translated to organizational and quality improvement practices.

The complexity of physicians' understanding and management of prognostic uncertainty in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE

Prognosis of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) remains challenging and uncertain. This paper investigates how physicians understand and address the ethical challenges of prognostic uncertainty in the case of neonatal HIE, contextualized within the social science literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 Canadian neurologists and neonatologists, addressing their perspectives and clinical experiences concerning neonatal HIE prognostication. Interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants unanimously recognized uncertainty in their prognostication. They identified several sources contributing to uncertainty in HIE prognostication, including etiology and underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, statistical limitations, variable clinical data, the dynamic process of neurodevelopment, or the impact of hypothermia treatment. Unlike in some other literature, some physicians in this study talked about ways to render uncertainty explicit rather than hide it.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study support the call for recognition of the ubiquitous uncertainty surrounding this act in medical education and training.

A shared vision of quality of life: Partnering in decision-making to understand families' realities

Quality of life (QOL) measures are increasingly used when important prognostication and treatment decisions need to be made in the care of a critically ill child. Unfortunately, health-care professionals and families experience difficulties when attempting to accurately predict and estimate QOL for a patient. Aspects such as subjectivity, complexity and adaptation to illness play an important role in how QOL is ultimately experienced. This often leads to inaccurate estimates of QOL, when performed by individuals other than the patient, such as clinicians or family members. In order to make decisions in the best interest of the patient, a partnership between families and clinicians must be fostered, based on communication, trust and mutual understanding of values. This article will attempt to describe some of the challenges that come into play when assessing QOL for a patient and will provide tools for building a clinician-family partnership in the decision-making process.

Understanding and addressing barriers to communication in the context of neonatal neurologic injury: Exploring the ouR-HOPE approach

Predicting neurologic outcomes for neonates with acute brain injury is essential for guiding the development of treatment goals and appropriate care plans in collaboration with parents and families. Prognostication helps parents imagine their child's possible future and helps them make ongoing treatment decisions in an informed way. However, great uncertainty surrounds neurologic prognostication for neonates, as well as biases and implicit attitudes that can impact clinicians' prognoses, all of which pose significant challenges to evidence-based prognostication in this context. In order to facilitate greater attention to these challenges and guide their navigation, this chapter explores the practice principles captured in the ouR-HOPE approach. This approach proposes the principles of Reflection, Humility, Open-mindedness, Partnership, and Engagement and related self-assessment questions to encourage clinicians to reflect on their practices and to engage with others in responding to challenges. We explore the meaning of each principle through five clinical cases involving neonatal neurologic injury, decision making, and parent-clinician communication. The ouR-HOPE approach should bring more cohesion to the sometimes disparate concerns reported in the literature and encourage clinicians and teams to consider its principles along with other guidelines and practices they find to be particularly helpful in guiding communication with parents and families.