Patient perspectives in pediatric neurology: a critical shift in the paradigm of outcome measurement

Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Patient Reported Outcome: A cognitively accessible measure of functional performance

AIM

To evaluate the structural validity, internal reliability, and measurement invariance of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Patient Reported Outcome (PEDI-PRO), a measure of functional performance of discrete tasks required to participate in everyday life situations important for adulthood.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study with 306 young people aged 14 to 22 years (mean 18 years 10 months, SD 2 years 5 months) with developmental disabilities (43.1% autism spectrum disorder only, 23.9% intellectual disability, 17.6% other disability, 11.4% both autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability, 3.9% missing) completed the PEDI-PRO. Following COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis, applied a Rasch rating-scale model, examined Cronbach's alpha, Rasch person reliability and separation coefficients, and differential item functioning (DIF).

RESULTS

Structural validity was good for the daily activities and mobility domains, and acceptable for the social/cognitive domain. The 3-point Likert response scale functioned as intended. All domains demonstrated acceptable internal consistency on all criteria. One or two items in each domain demonstrated DIF, but the impact on all domain scores was less than 1.0 threshold.

INTERPRETATION

The cognitively accessible design and innovative conceptual measurement framework probably contributed to these promising findings. The PEDI-PRO addresses a gap in high-quality patient-reported outcome measures that assess priority outcomes for young people with developmental disabilities.

Healthcare professionals face ethical challenges in managing care for neurodevelopmental disorders: a qualitative study in Lebanon

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the ethical challenges faced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in managing children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in Lebanon. The primary research question addressed how HCPs navigate ethical dilemmas related to patient autonomy, surrogate decision-making and communication in the context of severe cognitive impairments.

DESIGN

Qualitative, cross-sectional study using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was applied to identify key ethical challenges in clinical practice.

SETTING

Participants recruited from a range of healthcare specialties, including paediatric neurology, general paediatrics and psychiatry, and registered with the Lebanese Order of Physicians.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen HCPs, including paediatric neurologists and psychiatrists, participated in the study. Participants were selected based on their experience in treating children and adolescents with NDDs. There were no exclusion criteria based on gender, ethnicity or years of experience.

INTERVENTIONS

No formal interventions were applied. Participants were interviewed about their experiences and ethical challenges in managing patients with NDD.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the identification of ethical dilemmas faced by HCPs in clinical decision-making with patients with NDD. Secondary outcomes included insights into the strategies employed by HCPs to balance patient autonomy with surrogate decision-making and the communication challenges they face with patients' families.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis revealed several key ethical challenges, including (1) balancing patient autonomy with the need for surrogate decision-making, (2) tailoring healthcare to individual cognitive abilities and (3) navigating the complexities of communication with patients and their families. Participants emphasised the importance of assessing decision-making capacity on a case-by-case basis. The study also highlighted the need for specialised, patient-centred approaches that respect autonomy while considering the practical limitations imposed by severe cognitive impairments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides critical insights into the ethical considerations faced by HCPs in managing children and adolescents with NDDs. Further research is needed to develop training programs for HCPs that address these ethical challenges and promote patient-centred decision-making.

Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS parent proxy mobility item bank for use in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

AIM

To evaluate the psychometric properties and measurement quality of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Parent Proxy (PROMIS PP) Mobility item bank (v1.0, 23 items) for children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), through Rasch statistical analysis.

METHOD

De-identified PROMIS PP Mobility items were completed by the caregivers of male patients with DMD, aged 4 to 12 years, as part of standard clinical care at the Nationwide Children's Hospital clinic; data were mined retrospectively from electronic health records. Rasch analysis was used to assess the internal functioning of the measure and items.

RESULTS

Overall, 151 observations were available for the Rasch analysis, equally split between patients aged 4 to 7 years and 8 to 12 years. After removing clinically irrelevant items and regrouping response options for specific items, the resulting 19-item measure demonstrated overall good fit to Rasch model expectations and the ability to discriminate between respondents with different mobility levels (Person Separation Index = 0.95, excellent reliability).

INTERPRETATION

The customized PROMIS PP Mobility measure demonstrated good fit and may be a reliable option for mobility assessment in children with DMD. Rasch analysis can be used by other researchers to improve the sensitivity of patient-reported outcomes in their field of interest.

Effectiveness of interventions for school-aged-children and adolescents with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To describe allied health and educational interventions and their effectiveness for children and adolescents with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). To appraise the quality and strength of studies.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched between 2005 and March 2022, identifying non-pharmacological studies supporting function, activity, or participation for FASD participants aged 5-18 years using any quantitative research design. Outcomes were coded using International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, family of Participation Related Constructs and behaviour categories. Multi-level random-effects meta-analysis examined intervention effects. Study methodological quality was evaluated using Cochrane risk of bias tools, RoBiNT, AMSTAR 2 and NHMRC Hierarchy levels of evidence. Certainty of findings were synthesised using GRADE approach.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 25 studies with 735 participants, 10 of which were analysed by meta-analysis. Body function and structure, activity, behaviour, and sense of self outcomes were pooled. A small, positive effect favouring interventions was found (g = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.15-0.43), however the GRADE certainty was rated as low. No participation outcomes were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Some interventions targeting body function and structure, activity and behaviour outcomes were effective. Evidence of interventions that support children's and adolescent's participation as an outcome is lacking.

Meaningful outcomes for children and their caregivers attending a paediatric brain centre

AIM

To identify meaningful outcomes of children and their caregivers attending a paediatric brain centre.

METHOD

We compiled a long list of outcomes of health and functioning of children with brain-related disorders such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, (genetic) neurodevelopmental disorders, and acquired brain injury. We incorporated three perspectives: patients, health care professionals, and published outcome sets. An aggregated list was categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children and Youth version in a patient validation survey for children and parent-caregivers to prioritize outcomes. Outcomes were considered meaningful when ranked 'very important' by 70% or more of the participants.

RESULTS

We identified 104 outcomes from the three perspectives. After categorizing, 59 outcomes were included in the survey. Thirty-three surveys were completed by children (n = 4), caregivers (n = 24), and parent-caregivers together with their child (n = 5). Respondents prioritized 27 meaningful outcomes covering various aspects of health and functioning: emotional well-being, quality of life, mental and sensory functions, pain, physical health, and activities (communication, mobility, self-care, interpersonal relationships). Parent-caregiver concerns and environmental factors were newly identified outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Children and parent-caregivers identified meaningful outcomes covering various aspects of health and functioning, including caregiver concerns and environmental factors. We propose including those in future outcome sets for children with neurodisability.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Outcomes that children with brain-related disorders and their parent-caregivers consider to be the most meaningful cover a wide range of aspects of functioning. Involving these children and their parent-caregivers resulted in the identification of important outcomes that were not covered by professionals and the literature. Parent-caregiver-related factors (coping, burden of care) and environmental factors (support, attitudes, and [health care] services) were identified as meaningful.

Benefits and Challenges of Pediatric-to-Adult Health Care Transition in Childhood-Onset Neurologic Conditions

Background and Objectives

Although the importance of pediatric-to-adult health care transition (HCT) has been recognized, individuals with childhood-onset neurologic conditions often encounter challenges during pediatric-to-adult HCT, and HCT benefits for this population remain elusive. We assessed the current HCT situation in individuals with childhood-onset neurologic conditions to develop an improved transition system that incorporates patient perspectives.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Tokyo Metropolitan Kita Medical and Rehabilitation Center for the Disabled from November 2020 to December 2020. We targeted adults with childhood-onset neurologic conditions who visited the Department of Internal Medicine and their families. Questionnaires provided to 127 patients asked them about their experiences with pediatric-to-adult HCT (i.e., educational opportunities regarding HCT during pediatric visits, difficulties in transition, and the merits/demerits of adult practice) and their families' perspectives regarding pediatric-to-adult HCT. We also reviewed the patients' medical records to examine the severity of their disabilities.

Results

Responses were collected from 111 patients (response rate: 87%). Most patients had both severe physical and intellectual disabilities, and approximately half had a physical disability level of Gross Motor Function Classification System V and a profound intellectual disability. Half of the respondents were not transitioned through pediatric-to-adult HCT by their pediatricians, and they visited adult departments by themselves without a formal referral process. They experienced difficulties during HCT, such as a lack of knowledge regarding adult health care providers and consultants. However, those who underwent HCT benefited from it in terms of their health, experience, and service use, such as age- and condition-appropriate care, seeing adult specialists, and the introduction of adult services. They also addressed challenges in managing appointments and having adult doctors understand their medical history. Nonetheless, they were not informed about diseases and medical and welfare resources for adulthood during pediatric visits and desired to discuss future plans with pediatricians.

Discussion

Systems that provide sufficient pediatric-to-adult HCT for individuals with childhood-onset neurologic conditions are required. Lifelong education for patients and families, training for pediatricians on HCT and neurologists on childhood-onset conditions and disabilities, and clinical practice and human resources that support patients and families are warranted.

Implementing an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome and Decision Support Tool in Early Intervention

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to identify and prioritize early intervention (EI) stakeholders' perspectives of supports and barriers to implementing the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM), an electronic patient-reported outcome (e-PRO) tool, for scaling its implementation across multiple local and state EI programs.

METHODS

An explanatory sequential (quan > QUAL) mixed-methods study was conducted with EI families (n = 6), service coordinators (n = 9), and program leadership (n = 7). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were used to share select quantitative pragmatic trial results (e.g., percentages for perceived helpfulness of implementation strategies) and elicit stakeholder perspectives to contextualize these results. Three study staff deductively coded transcripts to constructs in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data within CFIR constructs were inductively analyzed to generate themes that were rated by national early childhood advisors for their relevance to longer term implementation.

RESULTS

All three stakeholder groups (i.e., families, service coordinators, program leadership) identified thematic supports and barriers across multiple constructs within each of four CFIR domains: (1) Six themes for "intervention characteristics," (2) Six themes for "process," (3) three themes for "inner setting," and (4) four themes for "outer setting." For example, all stakeholder groups described the value of the YC-PEM e-PRO in forging connections and eliciting meaningful information about family priorities for efficient service plan development ("intervention characteristics"). Stakeholders prioritized reaching families with diverse linguistic preferences and user navigation needs, further tailoring its interface with automated data capture and exchange processes ("process"); and fostering a positive implementation climate ("inner setting"). Service coordinators and program leadership further articulated the value of YC-PEM e-PRO results for improving EI access ("outer setting").

CONCLUSION

Results demonstrate the YC-PEM e-PRO is an evidence-based intervention that is viable for implementation. Optimizations to its interface are needed before undertaking hybrid type-2 and 3 multisite trials to test these implementation strategies across state and local EI programs with electronic data capture capabilities and diverse levels of organizational readiness and resources for implementation.

Capturing Meaningful Outcomes in -Pediatric Neurology: Further Reflections on Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities

Patient and public involvement in health care is considered indispensable in the way we conduct daily pediatric neurology practice, and in the development and utilization of health outcome measurements. This essay examines what meaningful quality evaluations and measurements are, describes the development of approaches to measuring health and outcomes, explores the potential applications of patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric neurology, and identifies opportunities and challenges in using patient-reported outcome measurements in our daily clinical practice. Recent developments have transformed our attitude on how to help children with neurological and developmental conditions and their families: specifically, (1) the recognition of the fundamental rights of children with disabilities; (2) the application of the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health by the World Health Organization that views health from the perspective of both biopsychosocial strengths and functional abilities; (3) the application of qualitative research methodologies to children with neurological conditions and their caregivers to elucidate what they consider essential for their own good health and well-being; and (4) the development of core outcome measurements sets for children and adults with various neurological and developmental conditions. In summary, supporting patients in their role as full partners in clinical care and research enables them to contribute their experiential knowledge and helps ensure that results are relevant and address patient needs, preferences, and priorities. Recognizing the importance of involving young people in their health management decisions has become central in contemporary medicine and needs to be part of the curriculum of all health care professionals.