Interindividual differences in the clinical effectiveness of liraglutide in Type 2 diabetes: a real-world retrospective study conducted in Spain

Different formulations of semaglutide and oxidative stress in subjects with type 2 diabetes and MASLD: an open-label, real-life study

AIM

Semaglutide exerts metabolic effects and cardiovascular protection in type 2 diabetes (T2D), also acting on hepatic steatosis and inflammation. No data are, so far, available on the effect of semaglutide on oxidative stress, neither a comparison of injective (InjS) and oral (OrS) formulations has been performed in subjects with T2D and liver steatosis.

METHODS

In a real-life, open label, prospective study we compared standard doses of InjS and OrS in targeting liver inflammation and fibrosis and systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress by consecutively prescribing InjS or OrS formulation in a 2:1 ratio to sixty T2D + MASLD subjects (T0), observing them for 6 months (T1). Anthropometry, biochemistry and transient elastography (TE) data were collected; hormones, inflammatory cytokines and peroxidation products were measured.

RESULTS

At baseline, InjS and OrS subjects were similar, except for waist circumference, liver enzymes and Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP), a measure of liver steatosis (InjS > OrS, all p < 0.05). Differences emerged in T0-T1 variation between the formulations in HbA1c, lipid profile, blood pressure. CAP significantly decreased only in InjS. GLP-1 quite similarly increased; insulin, glucagon and GIP did not vary. InjS and OrS did not modify TNFα, IL-10 (an anti-inflammatory cytokine) and MCP-1, while IL-18 was reduced only by InjS. When exploring oxidative stress, AGEs were unaffected, Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances decreased in InjS, 4-Hydroxynonenal was reduced in OrS.

CONCLUSION

In T2D + MASLD subjects, InjS, better than OrS, improves metabolic control; a significant reduction of IL-18 by InjS, and a mild anti-oxidative effect of both formulations are reported for the first time.

Immediate Impact of Switching from Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DPP4) Inhibitors to Low-Dose (0.3 mg) Liraglutide on Glucose Profiles: A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

As treatment agents for diabetes, liraglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors are widely used because of their safety and tolerability. Regular treatment with liraglutide has been reported to significantly reduce blood glucose levels, but the impact of low-dose (0.3 mg) liraglutide on blood glucose levels immediately after treatment switching from a DPP4 inhibitor remains unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, retrospective, observational study in 55 inpatients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to investigate the changes (Δ) in their blood glucose levels at six time points (6-point) from the day before (day -1) to the day after (day 1) by switching the antidiabetic treatment from a DPP4 inhibitor to liraglutide 0.3 mg (low-dose liraglutide) once daily. We also attempted to identify factors associated with the blood glucose-lowering effects of liraglutide.

RESULTS

The median values of the changes in fasting, preprandial, and postprandial blood glucose levels and the fluctuations in the blood glucose levels expressed as the standard deviation of the 6-point blood glucose levels were significantly lower on day 1 than on day -1 (P < 0.05, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.01, respectively); there were no cases of severe hypoglycemia. The Δ blood glucose levels were not associated with the baseline serum hemoglobin A1c values or with any markers of the insulin secreting capacity. There were no associations between the previously used blood glucose-lowering drug and the Δ blood glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

Switching from a DPP4 inhibitor to low-dose (0.3 mg) liraglutide once daily significantly reduced the blood glucose levels and excursions of the blood glucose levels even from the very day after the treatment switch, with no serious adverse events.

Treatment effect heterogeneity following type 2 diabetes treatment with GLP1-receptor agonists and SGLT2-inhibitors: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A precision medicine approach in type 2 diabetes requires the identification of clinical and biological features that are reproducibly associated with differences in clinical outcomes with specific anti-hyperglycaemic therapies. Robust evidence of such treatment effect heterogeneity could support more individualized clinical decisions on optimal type 2 diabetes therapy.

METHODS

We performed a pre-registered systematic review of meta-analysis studies, randomized control trials, and observational studies evaluating clinical and biological features associated with heterogenous treatment effects for SGLT2-inhibitor and GLP1-receptor agonist therapies, considering glycaemic, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes. After screening 5,686 studies, we included 101 studies of SGLT2-inhibitors and 75 studies of GLP1-receptor agonists in the final systematic review.

RESULTS

Here we show that the majority of included papers have methodological limitations precluding robust assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity. For SGLT2-inhibitors, multiple observational studies suggest lower renal function as a predictor of lesser glycaemic response, while markers of reduced insulin secretion predict lesser glycaemic response with GLP1-receptor agonists. For both therapies, multiple post-hoc analyses of randomized control trials (including trial meta-analysis) identify minimal clinically relevant treatment effect heterogeneity for cardiovascular and renal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence on treatment effect heterogeneity for SGLT2-inhibitor and GLP1-receptor agonist therapies is limited, likely reflecting the methodological limitations of published studies. Robust and appropriately powered studies are required to understand type 2 diabetes treatment effect heterogeneity and evaluate the potential for precision medicine to inform future clinical care.

Precision medicine in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of treatment effect heterogeneity for GLP1-receptor agonists and SGLT2-inhibitors

Background

A precision medicine approach in type 2 diabetes requires identification of clinical and biological features that are reproducibly associated with differences in clinical outcomes with specific anti-hyperglycaemic therapies. Robust evidence of such treatment effect heterogeneity could support more individualized clinical decisions on optimal type 2 diabetes therapy.

Methods

We performed a pre-registered systematic review of meta-analysis studies, randomized control trials, and observational studies evaluating clinical and biological features associated with heterogenous treatment effects for SGLT2-inhibitor and GLP1-receptor agonist therapies, considering glycaemic, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes.

Results

After screening 5,686 studies, we included 101 studies of SGLT2-inhibitors and 75 studies of GLP1-receptor agonists in the final systematic review. The majority of papers had methodological limitations precluding robust assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity. For glycaemic outcomes, most cohorts were observational, with multiple analyses identifying lower renal function as a predictor of lesser glycaemic response with SGLT2-inhibitors and markers of reduced insulin secretion as predictors of lesser response with GLP1-receptor agonists. For cardiovascular and renal outcomes, the majority of included studies were post-hoc analyses of randomized control trials (including meta-analysis studies) which identified limited clinically relevant treatment effect heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Current evidence on treatment effect heterogeneity for SGLT2-inhibitor and GLP1-receptor agonist therapies is limited, likely reflecting the methodological limitations of published studies. Robust and appropriately powered studies are required to understand type 2 diabetes treatment effect heterogeneity and evaluate the potential for precision medicine to inform future clinical care.

Plain language summary

This review identifies research that helps understand which clinical and biological factors that are associated with different outcomes for specific type 2 diabetes treatments. This information could help clinical providers and patients make better informed personalized decisions about type 2 diabetes treatments. We focused on two common type 2 diabetes treatments: SGLT2-inhibitors and GLP1-receptor agonists, and three outcomes: blood glucose control, heart disease, and kidney disease. We identified some potential factors that are likely to lessen blood glucose control including lower kidney function for SGLT2-inhibitors and lower insulin secretion for GLP1-receptor agonists. We did not identify clear factors that alter heart and renal disease outcomes for either treatment. Most of the studies had limitations, meaning more research is needed to fully understand the factors that influence treatment outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

Liraglutide Effectiveness in Type 2 Diabetes: Insights from a Real-World Cohort of Portuguese Patients

Liraglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prescribed to diabetic patients for glycaemic control. To understand the impact of liraglutide in the real-world setting, this study analysed its effects in a Portuguese cohort of Type 2 diabetes patients. This was an observational, multicentric, and retrospective study that included 191 liraglutide-treated patients with at least 12 months of treatment. Patients’ data were collected and analysed during a 24-month follow-up period. Overall, liraglutide treatment effectively reduced HbA1c levels from 8.3% to around 7.5%, after 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.001). In fact, 38.2%, 37.2%, and 44.8% of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, experienced an HbA1c reduction of at least 1%. Moreover, a persistent reduction in anthropometric features was also observed, with 44.0%, 47.6%, and 54.4% of patients achieving a weight reduction of at least 3% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Finally, significant improvements were observed in the HDL-c and LDL-c levels. Our results demonstrate that liraglutide effectively promoted the reduction of HbA1c values during routine clinical practice, which was sustained throughout the study. In addition, there were significant improvements in anthropometric parameters and other cardiovascular risk factors.

Usefulness of circulating EPAC1 as biomarkers of therapeutic response to GLP-1 receptor agonists

AIMS

The response to Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is highly varia-ble among patients. Thus, the identification of predictive biomarkers of therapeutic response to GLP-1 RA could help us to optimize the use of this class of drugs. GLP-1RAs increase exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (EPAC). The aim of the present study was to assess whether the increase of EPAC1 after GLP-1RAs treatment could be a biomarker of clinical response.

METHODS

After showing that GLP-1 (10 ng/mL) significantly increased the expression of EPAC1 in human endo-thelial vascular cells (HUVEC), a pilot clinical study was planned. For this purpose 49 patients with type 2 diabetes who started treatment with liraglutide were included. EPAC1 concentration was determined by ELISA before and at one month of liraglutide treatment.

RESULTS

We found that serum concentration of EPAC1 increased significantly after treatment with liraglutide. Only in those patients in whom EPAC1 increased (64%), a significant decrease in HbA1c, LDL-C, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference was shown.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that the increase of circulating EPAC1 after GLP-1RAs treatment could be a useful biomarker to predict clinical GLP1-RAs response.

High-Dose Liraglutide and SGLT2 Inhibitor: A Promising Combination

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists are important drugs in our armamentarium of treatment for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). In addition to their glucose-lowering effects, they have effects on weight, other metabolic diseases and perhaps most importantly, a cardioprotective and reno-protective effect. Liraglutide is a long-acting GLP-1 agonist which was originally used at 1.8 mg daily for the treatment of DM. However, high-dose liraglutide-liraglutide 3 mg daily, has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment for obesity, with or without DM. In this manuscript, I present two patients who had unusual responses to combination therapy with high-dose liraglutide and SGLT2 inhibitor-marked and/or rapid improvement in glycemic control and weight loss. Drawing from the observations in both cases, I discuss the complementary mechanisms of actions of both drugs, review the clinical effects of combination therapy and distil them into clinical pearls of practical utility for the physician. Given the "clash of the two pandemics" of obesity and COVID-19 and the burgeoning rates of obesity which loom in the near horizon, this is most timely.

Liraglutide effects on glycemic control and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes Mellitus: A real-world, observational study and brief narrative review

BACKGROUND

Glycemic control and weight gain are two essential considerations in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacological agents are effective in lowering blood glucose levels but may result in significant weight gain. Liraglutideeffectively maintains glycemic control while reducingweight.

METHODS

This is a real-world study and brief narrative review of the effects of liraglutide on glycemic control and weight in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study uses data extracted from the electronic health record of the Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs.

RESULTS

In this study of 348 subjects, there was a statistically significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c of 0.9% (P < .0001) and weight of 2.3 kg (P < .0001). The majority (77.3%) were on concomitant insulin.Subjects with a baseline hemoglobin A1c greater than 9% had a significantly greater reduction than those below 9% (-0.7%;P < .0001). Those with a weight more than 100 kg had a significantly greater reduction than those below 100 kg (-0.9 kg;P = .0096).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world, observational study, liraglutide was shown to be effective in improving glycemic control and reducing weight in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Precision medicine in adult and pediatric obesity: a clinical perspective

It remains largely unknown as to why some individuals experience substantial weight loss with obesity interventions, while others receiving these same interventions do not. Person-specific characteristics likely play a significant role in this heterogeneity in treatment response. The practice of precision medicine accounts for an individual's genes, environment, and lifestyle when deciding upon treatment type and intensity in order to optimize benefit and minimize risk. In this review, we first discuss biopsychosocial determinants of obesity, as understanding the complexity of this disease is necessary for appreciating how difficult it is to develop individualized treatment plans. Next, we present literature on person-specific characteristics associated with, and predictive of, weight loss response to various obesity treatments including lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, metabolic and bariatric surgery, and medical devices. Finally, we discuss important gaps in our understanding of the causes of obesity in relation to the suboptimal treatment outcomes in certain patients, and offer solutions that may lead to the development of more effective and targeted obesity therapies.

Liraglutide in a real-world setting: Joint modeling of metabolic response, prediction of efficacy, and cardiovascular risk

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus increases in parallel to that of obesity. Liraglutide (LRG), a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, can reduce body weight. This study assessed the metabolic efficacy of LRG in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective cohort study including patients treated with LRG for at least one year (187 patients). Anthropometric and metabolic variables, a composite endpoint, factors predicting response to LRG, and cardiovascular risk over time were assessed. A linear mixed-effects model with a bivariate structure was constructed to investigate the time-dependent relationship between weight and HbA1c values.

RESULTS

HbA1c levels and weight significantly decreased in the first 12 weeks, and the decrease persisted at 12 and 24 months in all subgroups studied. Mean weight and HbA1c decreases after 24 months were 8.5kg and 1.7% respectively. HbA1c values <7% were achieved by 42% of patients at 12 months and by 40% at 24 months. Treatment with LRG allowed for reduction in insulin dose. No serious adverse events were noted. Cardiovascular risk decreased from high to moderate-low.

CONCLUSIONS

Under standard clinical practice conditions, LRG achieved a better metabolic response than seen in clinical trials. Efficacy at 12 weeks of treatment is a good predictor of response. LRG allows for delaying or reducing insulin dose by improving both weight and glucose control. Cardiovascular risk improved.