A real-world study of treatment patterns and outcomes in US managed-care patients with type 2 Diabetes initiating injectable therapies

U-Shaped association between apolipoprotein A1 and serum uric acid levels in patients with osteoporotic fractures: a cross-sectional study

Background

Lipid metabolism is closely linked to uric acid metabolism, with previous studies suggesting associations between lipid profiles to serum uric acid (SUA) levels. Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), a key component in lipid metabolism and transport, may also be associated with SUA levels, though research in this area remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the independent association between ApoA1 levels and SUA in patients with osteoporotic fractures (OPF).

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 2,108 OPF patients admitted to Kunshan Hospital, affiliated with Jiangsu University, from January 2017 to August 2023. Serum ApoA1 concentration was considered the exposure variable, and SUA concentration the outcome variable. Adjusted linear regression models and smooth curve fitting were employed to assess the relationship between ApoA1 and SUA. Nonlinear associations were examined using a generalized additive model (GAM), and a segmented regression method identified the inflection point. Univariate and stratified analyses were also performed.

Results

Following adjustment for confounding covariates, a nonlinear relationship, U-shaped association was identified between serum ApoA1 and SUA concentrations, with an inflection point at 1.52 g/L. Estimated effects and 95% confidence intervals to the left and right of the inflection point were -55.20 (-75.57 to -34.82) and 77.33 (22.48 to 132.19), respectively.

Conclusions

A U-shaped relationship between serum ApoA1 and SUA was identified in OPF patients. Based on these findings, we propose the concept of a "SUA trough" within the OPF population, additional research is required to explore the mechanism behind this association.

Basal Insulinotherapy in Patients Living with Diabetes in France: The EF-BI Study

INTRODUCTION

Second-generation basal insulins like glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) have a longer duration of action and less daily fluctuation and interday variability than first-generation ones, such as glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100). The EF-BI study, a nationwide observational, retrospective study, was designed to compare persistence, acute care complications, and healthcare costs associated with the initiation of such basal insulins (BI) in a real-life setting in France.

METHODS

This study was conducted using the French healthcare claims database (SNDS). Adult patients living with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) initiating Gla-300 or Gla-100 ± other hypoglycemic medications between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020, and without any insulin therapy over the previous 6 months were included. Persistence was defined as remaining on the same insulin therapy until discontinuation defined by a 6 month period without insulin reimbursement. Hospitalized acute complications were identified using ICD-10 codes. Total collective costs were established for patients treated continuously with each basal insulin over 1-3 years. All comparisons were adjusted using a propensity score based on initial patient/treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 235,894 patients with T2DM and 6672 patients with T1DM were included. Patients treated with Gla-300 were 83% (T1DM) and 44% (T2DM) less likely to discontinue their treatment than those treated with Gla-100 after 24 months (p < 0.0001). The annual incidence of acute hospitalized events in patients with T2DM treated with Gla-300 was 12% lower than with Gla-100 (p < 0.0001) but similar in patients with T1DM. Comparison of overall costs showed moderate but statistically significant differences in favor of Gla-300 versus Gla-100 for all patients over the first year, and in T2DM only over a 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Use of Gla-300 resulted in a better persistence, less acute hospitalized events at least in T2DM, and reduced healthcare expenditure. These real-life results confirmed the potential interest of using Gla-300 rather than Gla-100.

Big Data and Real-World Data based Cost-Effectiveness Studies and Decision-making Models: A Systematic Review and Analysis

Background: Big data and real-world data (RWD) have been increasingly used to measure the effectiveness and costs in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). However, the characteristics and methodologies of CEA based on big data and RWD remain unknown. The objectives of this study were to review the characteristics and methodologies of the CEA studies based on big data and RWD and to compare the characteristics and methodologies between the CEA studies with or without decision-analytic models. Methods: The literature search was conducted in Medline (Pubmed), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (as of June 2020). Full CEA studies with an incremental analysis that used big data and RWD for both effectiveness and costs written in English were included. There were no restrictions regarding publication date. Results: 70 studies on CEA using RWD (37 with decision-analytic models and 33 without) were included. The majority of the studies were published between 2011 and 2020, and the number of CEA based on RWD has been increasing over the years. Few CEA studies used big data. Pharmacological interventions were the most frequently studied intervention, and they were more frequently evaluated by the studies without decision-analytic models, while those with the model focused on treatment regimen. Compared to CEA studies using decision-analytic models, both effectiveness and costs of those using the model were more likely to be obtained from literature review. All the studies using decision-analytic models included sensitivity analyses, while four studies no using the model neither used sensitivity analysis nor controlled for confounders. Conclusion: The review shows that RWD has been increasingly applied in conducting the cost-effectiveness analysis. However, few CEA studies are based on big data. In future CEA studies using big data and RWD, it is encouraged to control confounders and to discount in long-term research when decision-analytic models are not used.

Switching from insulin to dulaglutide therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world data study

AIM

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who require injectable therapy have been conventionally treated with insulin. A glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist was recently recommended as first-line injectable treatment, but few studies have investigated the effects of switching from insulin to dulaglutide. This study investigated the clinical efficacy and parameters affecting responses to dulaglutide as an alternative to insulin in patients with T2DM in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients with T2DM who were switched from insulin to dulaglutide therapy were retrospectively evaluated. Changes in HbA1c concentrations were assessed after 6 months of consistent treatment with dulaglutide. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate parameters affecting the response to dulaglutide treatment.

RESULTS

After treatment with dulaglutide for 6 months, patients experienced changes in HbA1c of -0.95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.30% to -0.59%, P < 0.001) and in body weight of -1.75 kg (95% CI: -2.42 to -1.08 kg, P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that higher baseline HbA1c was significantly associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Switching from insulin to dulaglutide can lead to significant improvement in HbA1c levels and body weight ​reduction in T2DM patients over 6 months. Higher baseline HbA1c is associated with a better clinical response to dulaglutide.

Treatment persistence in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in clinical practice in Sweden

AIM

To compare treatment persistence in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) dulaglutide, exenatide once-weekly (QW), liraglutide or lixisenatide in routine clinical practice in Sweden and assess clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study using data from several nationwide Swedish health registries, including the National Diabetes Register and other mandatory and population-based registries. Individual level data were collected from 17 361 patients who initiated GLP-1 RA treatment from 23 May 2015 to 15 October 2017, up to 2.5 years postindex (treatment start date). Treatment persistence and modification, predictors of discontinuation, HbA1c and body weight were recorded. Non-persistence was defined as a treatment gap of more than 45 days. Treatment modification included switching and augmentation. Confounding was addressed through the use of propensity scores.

RESULTS

Treatment persistence was higher and treatment modifications were lower in patients initiating dulaglutide compared with those on exenatide QW, liraglutide and lixisenatide. Patients who remained on the same treatment for 1-year postindex experienced greater HbA1c reductions and a steadier decrease in body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that in clinical practice in Sweden there is a greater persistence of treatment among patients initiating dulaglutide compared with those on exenatide QW, liraglutide and lixisenatide. Persistence with the index GLP-1 RA was closely correlated with positive clinical outcomes and thus should be considered a critical factor of patient-centric treatment in Sweden.

Advanced CKD Among Adults With Cerebral Palsy: Incidence and Risk Factors

Rationale & Objective

Recent evidence suggests that adults with cerebral palsy have an elevated risk for developing advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). To develop effective interventions, the objective was to identify whether demographics and preexisting medical conditions are risk factors for advanced CKD among adults with cerebral palsy.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants

Data were from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Adults 18 years or older with cerebral palsy and without advanced CKD (CKD stage 4 or later) were identified from 2013 and subsequently followed up from January 1, 2014, to the development of advanced CKD, death, loss to follow-up, or end of the study period (December 31, 2017), whichever came first. Diagnostic, procedure, and diagnosis-related group codes were used to identify cerebral palsy, incident cases of advanced CKD, comorbid intellectual disability, and 10 preexisting medical conditions.

Exposures

Demographic variables and 10 preexisting medical conditions: CKD stages 1-3, hypertension, diabetes, heart and cerebrovascular disease, non-CKD urologic conditions, bowel conditions, respiratory disease, skeletal fragility, arthritis, and dysphagia.

Outcome

Incidence of advanced CKD.

Analytic Approach

Crude incidence rate (IR) of advanced CKD and IR ratios with 95% CIs were estimated. Cox proportional hazards regression models that were adjusted for demographics, intellectual disability, and preexisting medical conditions were used to evaluate the adjusted independent effect of predictor variables.

Results

237 of the 8,011 adults with cerebral palsy developed advanced CKD during follow-up (IR, 10.16/1,000 person years; 95% CI, 8.87-11.46). In the crude analysis, all preexisting medical conditions were associated with an elevated IR and IR ratio of advanced CKD. In the fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, the HR was elevated for older age, CKD stages 1-3 (HR, 3.32; 95% CI, 2.39-4.61), diabetes (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.03-3.57), hypertension (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, .10-2.16), heart and cerebrovascular disease (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07), and non-CKD urologic conditions (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.84).

Limitations

Private insurance database, short follow-up period, and lack of laboratory values, such as albuminuria/proteinuria.

Conclusions

Advanced CKD was common among adults with cerebral palsy and its development was associated with both traditional and nontraditional urologic risk factors.

Diabetes-Related Effectiveness and Cost of Liraglutide or Insulin in German Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 5-Year Retrospective Claims Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To date, limited long-term data (> 2 years) exist comparing real-world diabetes-related effectiveness and costs for liraglutide versus insulin treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective claims data analysis covered the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2017 and included continuously insured patients with T2DM who initiated insulin or liraglutide and had 3.5 or 5 years' follow-up data, identified using the German AOK PLUS dataset. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

After PSM, there were 825 and 436 patients in the liraglutide and insulin groups at 3.5 and 5 years' follow-up, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between compared cohorts. The respective change from baseline to follow-up in mean glycated haemoglobin for liraglutide and insulin patients was - 0.88% and - 0.81% (p > 0.100) after 3.5 years and - 1.15%/ - 1.02% (p > 0.100) after 5 years. Mean respective changes in body mass index (kg/m2) were - 1.21/+ 1.14 (p < 0.001) after 3.5 years and - 1.29/+ 1.13 after 5 years (p < 0.001). Liraglutide- versus insulin-treated patients were less likely to have an early T2DM-related hospitalisation (3.5-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.414 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.263-0.651]; 5-year HR: 0.448 [95% CI 0.286-0.701]). At 5 years' follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in total direct costs between treatment groups (cost ratio: 1.069 [95% CI 0.98-1.13]; p > 0.100).

CONCLUSION

The clinical effectiveness of liraglutide is maintained long term (up to 5 years). Liraglutide treatment is not associated with higher total direct healthcare costs.

Risk of advanced chronic kidney disease among adults with spina bifida

PURPOSE

Adults with spina bifida (SB) may be susceptible to accelerated progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to advanced stages. However, little is known regarding risk of advanced CKD for this underserved population. The objective was to estimate the risk of advanced CKD among adults with vs. without SB.

METHODS

Data were from Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Adults (18+ years) without advanced CKD (CKD stages 4+) in 2013 were followed from 01/01/2014 to advanced CKD, death, loss to follow-up, or 12/31/2017. Diagnostic, procedure, and diagnosis-related group codes were used to identify SB, advanced CKD, and baseline cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and diabetes. Incidence rate (IR) and IR ratio and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of advanced CKD were estimated. Cox regression estimated adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for incidence of advanced CKD.

RESULTS

The crude IR of advanced CKD was 7.40 for adults with SB (n = 4295) and 6.25 for adults without SB (n = 6.6 M). After adjusting for demographics, adults with SB had greater risk of advanced CKD compared to adults without SB (HR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.72-2.60), which remained elevated with further adjustment for cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and diabetes (HR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.55-2.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with SB may have greater risk of advanced CKD incidence compared to adults without SB.

The Expanding Role of Real-World Evidence Trials in Health Care Decision Making

Real-world evidence (RWE) is the clinical evidence about benefits or risks of medical products derived from analyzing real world data (RWD), which are data collected through routine clinical practice. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of RWE studies, how these studies differ from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), how to overcome barriers to current skepticism about RWE, how FDA is using RWE, how to improve the quality of RWE, and finally the future of RWE trials.

GLP-1 RA Treatment and Dosing Patterns Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Six Countries: A Retrospective Analysis of Pharmacy Claims Data

INTRODUCTION

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) class is evolving and expanding. This retrospective database study evaluated recent real-world treatment and dosing patterns of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating GLP-1 RAs in Belgium (BE), France (FR), Germany (DE), Italy (IT), the Netherlands (NL), and Canada (CA).

METHODS

Adult T2D patients initiating GLP-1 RA therapy (dulaglutide [DULA], exenatide twice daily [exBID], exenatide once weekly [exQW], liraglutide [LIRA], or lixisenatide [LIXI]) from 2015 to 2016 were identified using the IQVIA (IQVIA, Durham, NC, and Danbury, CT, USA) Real-World Data Adjudicated Pharmacy Claims. The therapy initiation date was termed the 'index date.' Eligible patients had ≥ 180 days pre-index and ≥ 360 days post-index. Persistence (until discontinuation or switch) was evaluated over the variable follow-up using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. Average daily dose (ADD) was calculated until discontinuation or switch.

RESULTS

A total of 34,649 DULA, 3616 exBID, 11,138 exQW, 48,317 LIRA, and 2,204 LIXI patients were included in the analysis (34.9-63.2% female; median age range 53-62 years; median follow-up 16-30 months). Proportion persistent at 1-year post-index was 36.8-67.2% for DULA, 5.9-44.4% for exBID, 24.7-44.2% for exQW, 22.2-57.5% for LIRA, and 15.5-40.0% for LIXI. Median time persistent (days) was 245-381 for DULA, 62-243 for exBID, 121-319 for exQW, 103-507 for LIRA, and 99-203 for LIXI. Mean ADD was 13.21-20.43 µg for exBID, 1.44-1.68 mg for LIRA, and 19.88-20.54 µg for LIXI. Mean average weekly dose (AWD) ranged from 2.03 to 2.14 mg for exQW. Mean AWD for DULA was 1.25 mg in Canada and ranged from 1.43 to 1.53 mg in the other countries.

CONCLUSION

Across six countries, persistence was highest among DULA patients and generally lowest among exBID patients. ADD/AWD for all GLP-1 RAs was in line with the recommended label. Longer-term data would be useful to obtain a better understanding of GLP-1 RA treatment patterns over time.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Medicaid Eligibility Expansions May Address Gaps In Access To Diabetes Medications

Diabetes is a top contributor to the avoidable burden of disease. Costly diabetes medications, including insulin and drugs from newer medication classes, can be inaccessible to people who lack insurance coverage. In 2014 and 2015 twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia expanded eligibility for Medicaid among low-income adults. To examine the impacts of Medicaid expansion on access to diabetes medications, we analyzed data on over ninety-six million prescription fills using Medicaid insurance in the period January 2008-December 2015. Medicaid eligibility expansions were associated with thirty additional Medicaid diabetes prescriptions filled per 1,000 population in 2014-15, relative to states that did not expand Medicaid eligibility. Age groups with higher prevalence of diabetes exhibited larger increases. The increase in prescription fills grew significantly over time. Overall, fills for insulin and for newer medications increased by 40 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Our findings suggest that Medicaid eligibility expansions may address gaps in access to diabetes medications, with increasing effects over time.

Clinical and economic outcomes among injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes initiating dulaglutide compared with basal insulin in a US real-world setting: the DISPEL Study

AIMS

To report 1-year clinical and economic outcomes from the retrospective DISPEL (Dulaglutide vs Basal InSulin in Injection Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Effectiveness in ReaL World) Study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational claims study included patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and ≥1 claim for dulaglutide or basal insulin between November 2014 and April 2017 (index date=earliest fill date). Propensity score matching was used to address treatment selection bias. Change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was compared between the matched cohorts using analysis of covariance; diabetes-related costs were analyzed using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

Matched cohorts (903 pairs total; 523 pairs with complete cost data) were balanced in baseline characteristics with mean HbA1c 8.6%, mean age 54 years. At 1 year postindex, dulaglutide patients had significantly greater reduction in HbA1c than basal insulin (-1.12% vs -0.51%, p<0.01), lower medical costs ($3753 vs $7604, p<0.01), higher pharmacy costs ($9809 vs $6175, p<0.01), and similar total costs ($13 562 vs $13 779, p=0.76). Medical and total costs per 1% HbA1c reduction were lower for dulaglutide than basal insulin (medical: $3128 vs $12 673, p<0.01; total: $11 302 vs $22 965, p<0.01), while pharmacy costs per 1% HbA1c reduction were lower without reaching statistical significance ($8174 vs $10 292, p=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, patients with T2D initiating dulaglutide demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction compared with those initiating basal insulin. Although total diabetes-related costs were similar, the total diabetes-related costs per HbA1c reduction were lower for dulaglutide, highlighting the importance of evaluating effectiveness along with the economic impact of medications.

Interindividual differences in the clinical effectiveness of liraglutide in Type 2 diabetes: a real-world retrospective study conducted in Spain

AIMS

To study the response of clinical variables (HbA_1c , body weight, lipid profile and blood pressure) over 24 months of liraglutide treatment in a real-world clinical setting, and to describe the evolution of HbA_1c and body weight reduction in response to liraglutide treatment by employing generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs).

METHODS

We included people aged ≥ 18 years with Type 2 diabetes mellitus that initiated liraglutide treatment between November 2011 and May 2015. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved retrospectively over 24 months from electronic medical records with a median duration of observation of 7.0 (IQR 3.0-12.0) months.

RESULTS

Individuals that initiated liraglutide therapy were obese (BMI 39.1 kg/m² ), with inadequate HbA_1c (68 mmol/mol [8.4%]), blood pressure and lipid levels. Upon liraglutide treatment, HbA_1c , body weight, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and lipid levels decreased gradually. GAMMs demonstrated that longer treatment with liraglutide was a predictor of improved HbA_1c response, whereas higher baseline HbA_1c , longer Type 2 diabetes duration and treatment with insulin were predictors of worse HbA_1c response. Higher baseline weight, longer treatment with liraglutide and the interaction between metformin and time were predictors of improved weight response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, we showed the effectiveness of liraglutide in improving body weight, HbA_1c , mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and lipid levels. GAMMs indicated that baseline HbA_1c and weight, time of treatment with liraglutide, diabetes duration and the use of metformin or insulin are predictors of clinical response to liraglutide.

Association of hypoglycaemia severity with clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes in US patients with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization and costs associated with patient-reported hypoglycaemia in US adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with basal insulin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational, cross-sectional, survey-based study of adults with T2D on basal insulin ± oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) or rapid-acting/premixed insulin, who had in the past ever experienced hypoglycaemia, using US data from the National Health and Wellness Survey. Eligible patients were categorized as having no hypoglycaemia (38.7%), non-severe hypoglycaemia (55.1%), or severe hypoglycaemia (6.2%) in the preceding 3 months. Outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment, healthcare resource utilization, and estimated direct and indirect costs. Multivariable regression models were performed to control for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients who experienced severe hypoglycaemia had significantly (P < .05) lower HRQoL scores, greater overall impairment of work productivity and activity, greater healthcare resource utilization, and higher costs compared with those who experienced non-severe or no hypoglycaemia. Patients with non-severe hypoglycaemia also reported an impact on the number of provider visits, indirect costs, and HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with T2D using basal insulin ± OADs or rapid-acting/premixed insulin in the United States who experienced severe hypoglycaemia had greater impairment of activity and work productivity, utilized more healthcare resources, and incurred higher associated costs than those with non-severe or no hypoglycaemia. The study also demonstrated the impact that non-severe hypoglycaemic events have on economic and HRQoL outcomes. Reducing the incidence and severity of hypoglycaemia could lead to clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL and may result in lower healthcare utilization and associated costs.

Anticipatory guidance in type 2 diabetes to improve disease management; next steps after basal insulin

The alarming rise in the number of people living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) presents primary care physicians with increasing challenges associated with long-term chronic disease care. Studies have shown that the majority of patients are not achieving or maintaining glycemic goals, putting them at risk of a wide range of diabetes-related complications. Disease- and self-management programs have been shown to help patients improve their glycemic control, and are likely to be of particular benefit for patients with diabetes dealing with these issues. Anticipatory guidance is an individualized, proactive approach to patient education and counseling by a health-care professional to support patients in better coping with problems before they arise. It has been shown to improve disease outcomes in a variety of chronic conditions, including diabetes. While important at all stages, anticipatory guidance may be of particular importance during changes in treatment regimens, and especially during transition to, and escalation of, insulin-based regimens. The aim of this article is to provide advice to physicians on anticipatory guidance for basal-insulin dosing, focusing on appropriate basal-insulin-dose increase and prevention of potentially deleterious basal-insulin doses, so called overbasalization. It also provides an overview of new treatment options for patients with T2D who are not well controlled on basal-insulin therapy, fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and advice on the type of anticipatory guidance needed to ensure safe and appropriate switching to these therapies.

What have we learnt from "real world" data, observational studies and meta-analyses

The incretin therapies glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors are now well-established as second and third-line therapies and in combination with insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Over the last decade, there is accumulating evidence of their efficacy and safety from both large multicentre randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies. Cardiovascular outcome trials have confirmed that several of these agents are also non-inferior to placebo with the GLP-1 RA liraglutide and semaglutide recently found to be superior in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events. Observational studies and post-marketing surveillance provide real world evidence of safety and effectiveness of these agents and have provided reassurance that signals for pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer seen in clinical trials are not of major concern in large patient populations. Well-designed real world studies complement RCTs and systematic reviews but appropriate data and methodologies, which are constantly improving, are necessary to answer appropriate clinical questions relating to the use of incretin therapies.

The Use of Decomposition Methods in Real-World Treatment Benefits Evaluation for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Different Injectable Therapies: Findings from the INITIATOR Study

BACKGROUND

Determining characteristics of patients likely to benefit from a particular treatment could help physicians set personalized targets.

OBJECTIVES

To use decomposition methodology on real-world data to identify the relative contributions of treatment effects and patients' baseline characteristics.

METHODS

Decomposition analyses were performed on data from the Initiation of New Injectable Treatment Introduced after Antidiabetic Therapy with Oral-only Regimens (INITIATOR) study, a real-world study of patients with type 2 diabetes started on insulin glargine (GLA) or liraglutide (LIRA). These analyses investigated relative contributions of differences in baseline characteristics and treatment effects to observed differences in 1-year outcomes for reduction in glycated hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) and treatment persistence.

RESULTS

The greater HbA_1c reduction seen with GLA compared with LIRA (-1.39% vs. -0.74%) was primarily due to differences in baseline characteristics (HbA_1c and endocrinologist as prescribing physician; P < 0.050). Patients with baseline HbA_1c of 9.0% or more or evidence of diagnosis codes related to mental illness achieved greater HbA_1c reductions with GLA, whereas patients with baseline polypharmacy (6-10 classes) or hypogylcemia achieved greater reductions with LIRA. Decomposition analyses also showed that the higher persistence seen with GLA (65% vs. 49%) was mainly caused by differences in treatment effects (P < 0.001). Patients 65 years and older, those with HbA_1c of 9.0% or more, those taking three oral antidiabetes drugs, and those with polypharmacy of more than 10 classes had higher persistence with GLA; patients 18 to 39 years and those with HbA_1c of 7.0% to less than 8.0% had higher persistence with LIRA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although decomposition does not demonstrate causal relationships, this method could be useful for examining the source of differences in outcomes between treatments in a real-world setting and could help physicians identify patients likely to respond to a particular treatment.

A real-world study of treatment patterns and outcomes in US managed-care patients with type 2 Diabetes initiating injectable therapies

AIMS

Examine real-world outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiating injectable therapy as part of the Initiation of New Injectable Treatment Introduced after Antidiabetic Therapy with Oral-only Regimens (INITIATOR) study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Linked insurance claims and medical record data were collected from 2 large US health insurers (April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2012) of T2DM adults initiating treatment with glargine (GLA) or liraglutide (LIRA). Baseline characteristics were examined and changes in 12-month follow-up outcomes were described for both treatment groups: HbA1c, weight change, hypoglycaemia, persistence, healthcare utilisation and costs.

RESULTS

A total of 4490 patients were included (GLA, 2116; LIRA, 2374). At baseline, GLA patients had significantly higher HbA1c vs LIRA patients (9.72% vs 8.19%; P < .001), lower likelihood of having HbA1c < 7% (7.1% vs 23.8%; P < .001), lower bodyweight (100.9 kg vs 110.9 kg, P < .001), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (0.88 vs 0.63; P < .001), and higher diabetes-related costs ($3492 vs $2089; P < .001), respectively. During 12-months of follow-up, treatment persistence was 64%, mean HbA1c reduction was -1.24% and weight change was + 1.17 among GLA patients, and was 49%, -0.51% and -2.74 kg, respectively, among LIRA patients. Diabetes-related costs increased significantly from baseline to follow-up for LIRA patients ($2089 vs $3258, P < .001) but not for GLA patients ($3492 vs $3550, P = .890).

CONCLUSIONS

There were clinically relevant baseline differences in both groups, suggesting that GLA and LIRA are prescribed for different patient groups, and highlighting that efficacy results from clinical trials do not always translate into real-world practice. Significant increases in healthcare costs were observed in the LIRA group, warranting further cost-effectiveness analysis.