Glycaemic control with add-on thiazolidinedione or a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes after the failure of an oral triple antidiabetic regimen: A 24-week, randomized controlled trial

Empagliflozin-based quadruple oral therapy for type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study

The management of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) remains challenging in cases of poor glycemic control despite triple Oral Hypoglycemic Agent (OHA) therapy. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Empagliflozin as part of a quadruple OHA regimen over a 7-year follow-up period in 575 adult patients with uncontrolled T2DM on a triple OHA regimen and who were unwilling to initiate insulin therapy. Overall, 92.5% of patients achieved their target HbA1c levels. Significant reductions were observed in all glycemic parameters after 68 months (p < 0.001). Weight and BMI significantly decreased, whereas waist circumference remained unchanged. Lipid profiles showed significant improvements in total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides, while HDL levels did not change significantly. Blood pressure trends revealed significant reductions in both diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), though systolic blood pressure (SBP) remained relatively stable. Our study indicates that adding empagliflozin to a drug regimen consisting of multiple OHAs can effectively control glycemia in T2DM patients with more pronounced target achievement (< 7%) and HbA1c reduction along with improvement in cardiometabolic parameters, suggesting its potential as a promising alternative for long-term glycemic management.

The impact of sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 inhibitors on lipid profile: A meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials

AIM

The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on blood lipid profile.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and EMBASE databases from the inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2i with placebo regarding lipid profile changes. The "Meta" package of R software was applied for data synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 28 RCTs were included and 5192 patients participated in the present study, including 2686 patients who received SGLT2is intervention and 2506 patients who were in the control group. SGLT2is significantly increased blood low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels [mean difference (MD): 0.09 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.03, 0.16), 95% prediction interval (PI) (-0.06, 0.24), P = 0.0046] and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels [MD: 0.08 mmol/L, 95% CI (0.06, 0.11), 95% PI (-0.00, 0.17), P < 0.0001]. However, we observed neutral effect of SGLT2is on total cholesterol (TC) [MD: 0.08 mmol/L, 95% CI (-0.08, 0.24), 95% PI (-0.24, 0.40), P = 0.3150] and triglyceride (TG) [MD: -0.03 mmol/L, 95% CI (-0.23, 0.16), 95% PI (-0.70, 0.63), P = 0.7382].

CONCLUSION

Our study determined that SGLT2is increase both LDL-C and HDL-C levels, but exerts not significant effect on TC and TG levels.

Glucometabolic control of once-weekly dulaglutide switched from DPP4 inhibitor versus daily empagliflozin add-on in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin, sulfonylurea, and DPP4 inhibitor: A randomised trial

AIMS

To compare the effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin and dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled by oral triple therapy.

METHODS

In this 24-week, multi-center, randomized trial, patients with T2D and HbA1c level ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol) on metformin, sulfonylurea, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4-i) were randomly assigned into two groups: daily empagliflozin add-on or once-weekly dulaglutide switched from DPP4-i. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline HbA1c at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

In total, 152 patients were recruited to the empagliflozin-added quadruple group (n = 76) or the switched-to-dulaglutide triple group (n = 76). At week 24, both groups showed significant reduction in HbA1c level from baseline with greater reduction with empagliflozin (the mean treatment difference: -0.27% [95% CI -0.50 to -0.04, p = 0.024]) (-2.88 mmol/mol [95% CI -5.37 to -0.39], p = 0.024). Empagliflozin significantly reduced body weight from baseline to week 24 (-1.72 kg [95% CI -1.98 to -0.59, p < 0.001]). No serious adverse events were reported with either empagliflozin or dulaglutide.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin, compared with once-weekly dulaglutide switched from DPP4-i, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin, sulfonylurea, and DPP4-i.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0006157).

Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors with Osteomyelitis and Other Lower Limb Safety Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Our aim was to evaluate osteomyelitis and other major lower limb safety outcomes (i.e., peripheral artery disease or PAD, ulcers, atraumatic fractures, amputations, symmetric polyneuropathy, and infections) in patients affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-is). We thus performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2-is at approved doses for T2DM with a placebo or standard of care. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through August 2022. Separate intention-to-treat analyses were implemented for each molecule to calculate Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RR_MH) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through a random-effects model. We processed data from 42 RCTs for a total of 29,491 and 23,052 patients, respectively assigned to SGLT2-i and comparator groups. SGLT2-is showed a pooled neutral effect on osteomyelitis, PAD, fractures, and symmetric polyneuropathy, whereas slightly deleterious sway on ulcers (RR_MH 1.39 [1.01-1.91]), amputations (RR_MH 1.27 [1.04-1.55]), and infections (RR_MH 1.20 [1.02-1.40]). In conclusion, SGLT2-is appear to not significantly interfere with the onset of osteomyelitis, PAD, lower limb fractures, or symmetric polyneuropathy, even though the number of these events proved consistently higher in the investigational groups; otherwise, local ulcers, amputations, and overall infections may be favoured by their employment. This study is registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF).

Effectiveness and safety of teneligliptin added to patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by oral triple combination therapy: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of teneligliptin over placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled by triple therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This trial was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The 12-week double-blind period was followed by a 12-week, open-label clinical trial. One hundred patients with T2D who failed to achieve the glycaemic target (7.1% ≤ HbA1c ≤ 9.0%) with conventional triple oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) of metformin, sulphonylurea, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor were assigned randomly 1:1 into teneligliptin and placebo-teneligliptin groups. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c level from baseline in each group at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

For a total of 99 patients (n = 51 for the teneligliptin group, and n = 48 for the placebo-teneligliptin group), the mean age and duration of diabetes were 60.7 and 13.6 years, respectively, and HbA1c was 7.8% at baseline. At 12 weeks, the teneligliptin group achieved a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline (-0.9% ± 0.6%, P < .001), with an intergroup difference of -0.75% compared with the placebo group (95% CI [-0.99%, -0.51%], P < .001). At the end of the 24-week treatment period, both groups showed significant reductions in HbA1c level from baseline (placebo-teneligliptin group, -0.8% ± 0.6% [P < .001], teneligliptin group, -0.9% ± 0.6% [P < .001]), without significant intergroup difference (-0.17%, 95% CI [-0.41%, 0.07%], P = .156). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of adverse events (placebo-teneligliptin group, n = 3 [6.3%]; teneligliptin group, n = 11 [11.1%]; P = .550), and the safety profiles were favourable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that teneligliptin could be a valid option as a fourth OAD for the treatment of patients with T2D inadequately controlled with a triple combination of OADs.

A Review on the Structure and Anti-Diabetic (Type 2) Functions of β-Glucans

Type 2 diabetes, a long-term chronic metabolic disease, causes severe and increasing economic and health problems globally. There is growing evidence that β-glucans can function as bioactive macromolecules that help control type 2 diabetes with minimal side effects. However, conflicting conclusions about the antidiabetic activities of β-glucans have been published, potentially resulting from incomplete understanding of their precise structural characteristics. This review aims to increase clarity on the structure-function relationships of β-glucans in treating type 2 diabetes by examining detailed structural and conformational features of naturally derived β-glucans, as well as both chemical and instrumental methods used in their characterization, and their underlying anti-diabetic mechanisms. This may help to uncover additional structure and function relationships and to expand applications of β-glucans.