Preoperative carboplatin and paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: results of a modified CROSS regimen utilizing radiation doses greater than 41.4 Gy

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Single-Center 10-Year Experience of Low Versus High-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

While neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered the standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dosing remains undefined. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes comparing patients treated with low-dose (LD-RT) versus high-dose (HD-RT) radiation therapy.

METHODS

Our institutional database was queried for patients with cT2-T4 or node-positive esophageal or GEJ cancer, who underwent surgery with neoadjuvant chemoradiation from 2010 through 2019. LD-RT and HD-RT regimens were defined as receiving total radiation dose ≤45 Gy and ≥50 Gy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazard modeling, and logistical regression were utilized for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were identified: 77 (27%) received LD-RT; 210 (73%) received HD-RT. Median follow-up from diagnosis to death or last contact was 37.1 months for the study cohort. Older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p = 0.02) and year of diagnosis (OR 0.77/year, p < 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of HD-RT relative to LD-RT. Compared with HD-RT, LD-RT was associated with improved 5 year overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 44.1%, p = 0.03). On multivariate hazard modeling, receipt of HD-RT was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79, 95% 1.19-2.68, p = 0.005), disease-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.88, p = 0.02), and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.11-2.55, p = 0.01) compared with those treated with LD-RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite less frequent utilization than HD-RT strategies, LD-RT is associated with improved survival in those treated with neoadjuvant CRT for esophageal or GEJ cancer.

Drug Delivery Opportunities in Esophageal Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospects

With one of the highest mortality rates of all malignancies, the 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer is under 20%. Depending on the stage and extent of the disease, the current standard of care treatment paradigm includes chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical esophagogastrectomy, with consideration for adjuvant immunotherapy for residual disease. This regimen has high morbidity, due to anatomic changes inherent in surgery, the acuity of surgical complications, and off-target effects of systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We begin with a review of current treatments, then discuss new and emerging targets for therapies and advanced drug delivery systems. Recent and ongoing preclinical and early clinical studies are evaluating traditional tumor targets (e.g., human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), as well as promising new targets such as Yes-associated protein 1 or mammalian target of rapamycin to develop new treatments for this disease. Due the function and location of the esophagus, opportunities also exist to pair these treatments with a drug delivery strategy to increase tumor targeting, bioavailability, and intratumor concentrations, with the two most common delivery platforms being stents and nanoparticles. Finally, early results with antibody drug conjugates and chimeric antigenic receptor T cells show promise as upcoming therapies. This review discusses these innovations in therapeutics and drug delivery in the context of their successes and failures, with the goal of identifying those solutions that demonstrate the most promise to shift the paradigm in treating this deadly disease.

Low-Dose Radiation Yields Lower Rates of Pathologic Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery is standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dose is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different preoperative radiation doses (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy or 50.4 Gy) on pathologic response and survival in E/GEJ cancer patients.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with E/GEJ tumors, treated with curative intent between January 2009 and December 2016 in two referral centers were divided into three groups (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy) according to the dose of preoperative radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, postoperative morbidity, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared among the three groups, with separate analyses for adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

RESULTS

From the 326 patients analyzed, 48 were included in the 41.4 Gy group (14.7%), 171 in the 45 Gy group (52.5%) and 107 in the 50.4 Gy group (32.8%). Postoperative complication rates were comparable (p = 0.399). A pCR was observed in 15%, 30%, and 34% of patients in the 41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy groups, respectively (p = 0.047). A 50.4 Gy dose was independently associated with pCR (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.99) in multivariate analysis. Within AC patients, pCR was observed in 6.2% of patients in the 41.4 Gy group, 29.2% of patients in the 45 Gy group, and 22.7% of patients in the 50.4 Gy group (p = 0.035). No OS or DFS differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A pCR was less common after a preoperative radiation dose of 41.4 Gy in AC patients. Radiation dose had no impact on postoperative morbidity, long-term survival, and recurrence.

Nivolumab adjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a review based on subgroup analysis of CheckMate 577 trial

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. Approximately 50% of patients have locally advanced disease. The CROSS and NEOCRTEC5010 trials have demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the standard treatment for patients with resectable disease. However, a pathological complete response is frequently not achieved, and most patients have a poor prognosis. The CheckMate 577 trial demonstrates that nivolumab adjuvant therapy improves disease-free survival in patents without a pathological complete response. However, there are still numerous clinical questions of concern that remain controversial based on the results of the subgroup analysis. In this review, we aim to offer constructive suggestions addressing the clinical concerns raised in the CheckMate 577 trial.

Role of shrinkage in esophageal-gastric junction cancer

The esophagus undergoes shrinkage after resection and fixation. The surgical in situ margin is greater than the specimen margin, measured by the pathologist. The length of disease-free margins is critical to therapeutic planning. We propose specimen fixing to avoid discrepancies between the operative finding and the pathological result.

The Key Clinical Questions of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer—A Review

Over 50% of individuals with esophageal cancer (EC) present with advanced stages of the disease; therefore, their outcome following surgery alone is poor, with only 25%–36% being alive 5 years post-surgery. Based on the evidence that the CROSS and NEOCRTEC5010 trials provided, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is now the standard therapy for patients with locally advanced EC. However, there are still many concerning clinical questions that remain controversial such as radiation dose, appropriate patient selection, the design of the radiation field, the time interval between chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery, and esophageal retention. With immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) rapidly becoming a mainstay of cancer therapy, along with radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, the combination mode of immunotherapy is also becoming a hot topic of discussion. Here, we try to provide constructive suggestions to answer the perplexing problems and clinical concerns for the progress of nCRT for EC in the future.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Between Lower and Higher Radiation Doses for Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) plus surgery has been a standard treatment for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer and carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (EC/GEJ), but the optimal preoperative radiation dose is still unclear. We performed this systematic review to explore the treatment efficacy and toxicity of different radiation dose levels and find an optimal dose-fractionation strategy in EC/GEJ patients receiving nCRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Embase and Ovid Medline were searched for articles involving cases of operable squamous and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ in which patients received nCRT up to a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions that were published until July 2019, when the search was performed. Physical dose distributions were converted to biologically equivalent doses (BEDs), which were described in units of gray (alpha/beta). Pooled rates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), failure patterns, and toxicities were compared between lower-dose radiation therapy (LDRT; BED ≤48.85 Gy₁₀) and higher-dose radiation therapy (HDRT; BED >48.85 Gy₁₀) for patients treated with nCRT.

RESULTS

A total of 110 studies with 7577 EC/GEJ patients receiving nCRT were included in this pooled analysis. Both the PFS and OS rates of patients receiving LDRT were significantly higher than those of patients receiving HDRT. Patients receiving LDRT had improved safety regarding treatment-related adverse events and lower distant failure rates than patients receiving HDRT. Utilization of modern radiation therapy (RT) techniques, including 3-dimensional conformal RT and intensity modulated RT, was associated with improved oncologic outcomes compared with 2-dimensional methods. Subgroup analysis showed that EC/GEJ patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiation to a dose of 40.0 to 41.4 Gy in 20-23 fractions showed improved OS compared with those receiving radiation above this dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited data, nCRT using BED ≤48.85 Gy₁₀ was suitable for locoregionally advanced, resectable EC/GEJ. A total dose of 40.0 to 41.4 Gy in 20 to 23 fractions using modern RT techniques might provide the optimal therapeutic ratio.

Impact of Radiation Dose on Postoperative Complications in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers

Introduction: The impact of radiation prescription dose on postoperative complications during standard of care trimodality therapy for operable stage II-III esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers has not been established. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers treated between 2004 and 2016 with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection at a single institution. Post-operative complications within 30 days were reviewed and scored using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Results were compared between patients treated with <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy, as well as to published CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation group data (41.4 Gy). Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated with <50 Gy (range 39.6-46.8 Gy) and 53 patients were treated with ≥ 50 Gy (range 50.0-52.5 Gy) delivered using IMRT/VMAT (41%), 3D-CRT (46%), or tomotherapy IMRT (12%). Complication rates and CCI scores between our <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy groups were not significantly different. Assuming a normal distribution of the CROSS data, there was no significant difference in CCI scores between the CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation, <50 Gy, or ≥ 50 Gy groups. Rates of pulmonary complications were greater in the CROSS group (50%) than our <50 Gy (38%) or ≥ 50 Gy (30%) groups. Conclusions: In selected esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients, radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy do not appear to increase 30 day post-operative complication rates. These findings suggest that the use of definitive doses of radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy) in the neoadjuvant setting may not increase post-operative complications.

Feasibility and Oncological Outcome of Preoperative Chemoradiation With IMRT Dose Intensification for Locally Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility and efficacy of a dose intensification with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost (IMRT-SIB) in locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer (GEJ).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed a series of 69 patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer treated at our Institute, between 2016 and 2019, with preoperative IMRT and SIB up to 52.5-54 Gy in 25 fractions in 5 weeks and concurrent carboplatin (AUC2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2), as in the CROSS regimen.

RESULTS

All patients completed the planned IMRT-SIB program with a median of four (range 1-5) cycles of concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin. Compliance to IMRT-SIB was 93%, whereas 54% of patients received four to five cycles and 87% at least three cycles of concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel. Grade 3 toxicity was reported in 19% of patients. Complete clinical response (cCR) was achieved in 48%, and 13% had disease progression after chemoradiation (CRT). Overall, 49% of patients underwent surgery; reasons for non-operation included cCR in cervical tumor location (10%) or cCR and patient decision (13%). A pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 44% of resected patients. Postoperative complications and mortality rates were 21 and 6%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 12 months (6-25), 2-year overall and progression-free (PFS) survival rates were 81 and 54%, respectively. No difference in PFS by histologic type in operated patients was reported. Non-operated cCR patients had higher PFS, including cervical locations and selected cCR patients who decided for non-operation (75 vs 30%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The study reported favorable results in safety and feasibility of the IMRT-SIB dose intensification in our preoperative CRT program. The toxicity was acceptable, allowing a high compliance to intensified radiation doses with dose reduction of concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin in some patients. The high rate of cCR and pCR suggested this intensified program is effective in the preoperative CRT and, for selected responsive patients, in the non-operative approach to esophageal and GEJ cancer. The 2-year survival rates were promising. A prospective study is being planned to confirm these observations.

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy with a total two-field lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

In the era of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT), the safety and clinical significance of radical lymphadenectomy specifically lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been questioned. Furthermore, the compliance to NACTRT with the CROSS regimen has not been well studied in the Indian population. This prospective study aimed to determine the compliance with CROSS regimen, feasibility and short-term outcomes of minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) with a total two-field lymphadenectomy after NACTRT.

METHODS

A prospective study (January 2014 to December 2018) of patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) eligible for NACTRT (cT1-4a, N0-1, M0) with CROSS regimen followed by MIE with total two-field lymphadenectomy. The compliance rate, post-operative complications and the pathological response rate were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 166 patients with locally advanced SCC, 76 (45.8%) were eligible for NACTRT and 34 completed NACTRT followed by MIE with a total two-field lymphadenectomy (study group). Twenty-nine (38.1%) patients did not complete NACTRT due to complications or poor compliance. Median (range) blood loss was 125 (50-450) ml and the median (range) operation time for the thoracoscopic phase was 205 (155-325) min. Total median (range) lymph node count and mediastinal lymph node counts were 20 (11-33) and 12, (8-21) respectively. Most common post-operative complications were pneumonia (n = 12, 35.3%) followed by RLN palsy (n = 10, 29.4%). Of the 22 patients who had a complete pathological response of the primary tumour, 7 (31.8%) patients had a node-positive disease.

CONCLUSION

NACTRT followed by MIE is feasible in patients with locally advanced SCC. The nodal disease is common even in patients with the complete pathological response of the primary tumour. The dropout rate with NACTRT using the CROSS regimen is high in the present study.

Long-Term Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemo-Radiotherapy as Intensive Neoadjuvant Protocol in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Simple Summary

Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) represents a standard approach for both Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and Adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the esophagus, leading to a 10–15% improvement in survival rate as compared with surgery alone in clinical trials. In this observational study, we report the efficacy and safety of an intensive nCRT protocol in the daily clinical practice, including 122 patients treated with induction chemotherapy, followed by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, and surgery. Our findings showed good long-term survival and high pathological complete response (pCR) rates, with acceptable side-effects. Notably, the oncological outcome was the same in ADC and SCC responder patients. Although the nCRT protocol here reported represents a distinctive single-center experience, our results contribute to better define the role of an intensive neoadjuvant approach as a reliable therapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, and enrich the current literature on this challenging context.

Abstract

Background: A phase II intensive neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) protocol for esophageal cancer (EC) was previously tested at our Center with promising results. We here present an observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the protocol also in “real life” patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 122 ECs (45.1% squamous cell (SCC) and 54.9% adenocarcinoma (ADC)) treated with induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TCF), followed by concomitant TCF and radiotherapy (50–50.4 Gy/25–28 fractions), between 2008 and 2017. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR). Results: With a median follow-up of 62.1 months (95% CI 50–67.6 months), 5-year OS and EFS rates were 54.8% (95% CI 44.7–63.9) and 42.7% (95% CI 33.1–51.9), respectively. A pCR was observed in 71.1% of SCC and 37.1% of ADC patients (p = 0.001). At multivariate analysis, ypN+ was a significant prognostic factor for OS (Hazard Ratios (HR) 4.39 [95% CI 2.36–8.18]; p < 0.0001), while pCR was a strong predictor of EFS (HR 0.38 [95% CI 0.22–0.67]; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The nCRT protocol achieved considerable long-term survival and pCR rates also in “real life” patients. Further research is necessary to evaluate this protocol in a watch-and-wait approach.

Management of Nonmalignant Tracheo- and Bronchoesophageal Fistula after Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Tracheo- or bronchoesophageal fistula (TBF) occurring after esophagectomy represent a rare but devastating complication. Management remains challenging and controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of different treatment approaches and to propose recommendations for the management of TBF.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2018, 15 patients were treated because of TBF and were analyzed with respect to fistula appearance, treatment strategy (stenting, endoscopic vacuum therapy and/or surgical reintervention) and outcome.

RESULTS

In each case, the fistula was small, located close to the tracheal bifurcation and associated simultaneously (n = 6, 40%) or metachronously (n = 9, 60%) with an anastomotic leakage. Latter was covered by esophageal stents in six patients which in turn resulted in occurrence of TBF at a later time in five patients. Management of TBF included conservative therapy (n = 3), stenting (n = 6), or suturing (n = 6). Ten patients underwent rethoracotomy. Treatment failure was observed in eight patients (53%). In all patients, treatment was accompanied by progressive sepsis. On the contrary, all seven patients with successful defect closure remained in good general condition.

CONCLUSION

Fistula appearance was similar in all patients. Implementation of esophageal stents cannot be recommended because of possibility of TBF at a later time point. Surgery is usually required and should preferably be performed when the patient's condition has been optimized at a single-stage repair. Esophageal diversion can only be recommended in patients with persisting mediastinitis. The key element for successful treatment of TBF, however, is control over sepsis; otherwise, outcome of TBF is devastating.

Modification of preoperative radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer (CROSS protocol) is safe and efficient with no impact on surgical morbidity

Purpose

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTH) is proven to be highly effective in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC). We investigated oncological outcome and morbidity in patients treated with a modified CROSS protocol followed by esophagectomy at our institution.

Methods

Patients with EC receiving neoadjuvant RCTH with paclitaxel and carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy (46 Gy) followed by esophagectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Histopathological response, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI) as well as perioperative morbidity were investigated.

Results

Thirty-six patients (86.1% male, mean age 61.3 years, standard deviation 11.52) received neoadjuvant RCTH before surgery. Sixteen patients (44.4%) were treated for squamous cell cancer, whereas 20 patients (55.6%) had adenocarcinoma. The majority (75%) underwent abdominothoracic esophageal resection. Major complications occurred in 7 patients (19.5%) including anastomotic leakage in 4 patients (11.1%). A R0 resection was achieved in 97.2%. A complete pathological remission was seen in 13 patients (36.1%). Major response, classified as Mandard tumor regression grade 1 and 2, was found in 26 patients (72.2%). Median OS and RFI were not reached.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy with 46 Gy and concomitant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is safe and effective. The results of this modified radiotherapy protocol are encouraging and should be considered in future patient treatment and study designs.

Taxane-based or platinum-based combination chemotherapy given concurrently with radiation followed by surgery resulting in high cure rates in esophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is one standard option for localized esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer patients but an optimal concurrent chemotherapy combination is not established.

METHODS

412 patients with resectable (cT1N1M0 or cT2-4N0-3M0) esophageal or GEJ cancer treated at the MDACC between October 2002 and June 2016 were analyzed. Exposures: CRT with DF or FOX followed by surgery (trimodality; TMT). Main outcomes and measures: Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 412 patients analyzed, 264 (64%) received DF and 148 (36%) FOX. The median age was 60 years, and 95% had adenocarcinoma. The clinical complete response, positron-emission tomography response, and pathologic complete response rates were 73%, 73%, and 30%, respectively. Median follow-up was 60.4 months. Median OS for the entire cohort was 81.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.3-122.0); 81.6 months (95% CI, 55.9-not estimable) for the DF group and 67.7 months (95% CI, 41.6-not estimable) for the FOX group (P = .24). The median DFS was 45.6 months (95% CI, 33.1-61.7) for the entire cohort; 49.5 months (95% CI, 38.6-70.3) for DF and 33.0 months (95% CI, 18.1-70.4; P = .38) for FOX. Higher tumor location (unfavorable) and clinical complete response (favorable) were prognostic for both OS and DFS in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

At our high-volume center, the outcome of 412 TMT esophageal cancer patients was excellent. Taxane-based chemotherapy produces nonsignificant favorable trend.

Drivers of 30- and 90-day Postoperative Death After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation, followed by esophagectomy, is a standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancers. The ChemoRadiOtherapy plus Surgery versus Surgery alone (CROSS) trial reported a 30-day mortality rate of 6%. We sought to evaluate 30- and 90-day mortality in similar patients in the United States and identify predictors of higher mortality rates.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with cT3-4/N+ esophageal cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy. Bivariate univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used to identify predictors of 30- and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 7691 patients. Readmission within 30 days of surgery occurred in 6.0% of patients. Mortality was 2.9% at 30 days and 7.2% at 90 days. Positive surgical margins conferred a more than doubled risk of 30- and 90-day mortality, 5.5% vs 2.7% and 14.6% vs 6.8% (both P < .001). Facility surgical volume impacted 30-day mortality, whereas readmission was associated with 90-day mortality, both exceeding 10% (P = .004 and P = .001, respectively). In patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery converted to open, 90-day mortality was 12.1% (P < .01). For patients 69 years and older, 90-day mortality was also 12.1% (P < .001). Patients who underwent esophagectomy more than 45 days from completion of chemoradiation also had higher 90-day mortality at 8.3% vs 6.2% (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative death at 30 and 90 days after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy appears to be on par with randomized data. Positive surgical margins, squamous cell carcinomas, age 69 and older, readmission within 30 days, and conversion from a minimally invasive operation to an open operation all carry a 90-day mortality risk exceeding 10%.

Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Potentially Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment consisting of five cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy), followed by esophagectomy, is the standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer in The Netherlands. It remains unclear whether intensification of neoadjuvant therapy leads to better outcomes. This study analyzed the outcomes of intensified chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We included patients who were deemed eligible for esophagectomy between January 2008 and December 2014. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of six cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve = 2 mg/mL/min) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m² of body surface area) and concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy administered in 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy each, 5 days per week), followed by esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 176 patients included in this study, 73% underwent a resection. At a median follow-up of 29.3 months for the total cohort, median disease-free survival (DFS) was 22.5 months. DFS at 3 and 5 years was 42% and 36%, respectively, while the overall survival (OS) rates were 47% and 38%, respectively. In addition, the 5-year DFS and OS rates of our resection group were 44% and 48%, respectively. In 102 patients (58%), grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed, mainly hematological. The postoperative mortality rate within 30 days was 4%, and pathological complete response was achieved in 35% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensification of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer is well tolerated, yielding high pathological complete response rates, but adverse events occurred frequently, and survival compared with conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy seems similar. Therefore, intensification of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should not be routinely used.

Stop hedging your bets: reasons for non-adherence to a tri-modality regimen in the treatment of esophageal cancer in a multidisciplinary setting

Background

In locally-advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC), providers' concerns regarding eventual surgical candidacy can persuade physicians to defer to definitive doses of 50 Gy or higher preoperatively. We report the successful completion rate of tri-modality therapy (TMT) (documented at the outset) and reasons for TMT non-adherence at a large multi-disciplinary esophageal program.

Methods

LAEC patients diagnosed 2007-2016 from a prospective institutional database were subdivided into CRT/S+ [completed chemoradiation (CRT) and surgery] and CRT/S- (CRT and no subsequent surgery) groups. Chart review provided surgery non-adherence reasons.

Results

A total of 283 patients met planned TMT criteria: 164 (58.0%) patients received 50 or 50.4 Gy CRT, 27 patients (9.5%) received greater than 50.4 Gy, and 92 patients received less than 50 Gy (32.5%, only 8 patients received CRT to 41.4 Gy); 221 (78.1%) completed surgery (CRT/S+), while 62 (21.9%) failed to advance to surgery (CRT/S-): 25 of 62 CRT/S- patients (40.3%) evidenced metastatic progression before surgery, 4 (6.5%) were deemed unresectable intraoperatively, 4 (6.5%) expired prior to planned surgery (3 from unknown causes, 1 suicide), 8 (12.9%) experienced significant CRT-related medical decompensation and were withdrawn from surgical consideration, 16 (25.8%) voluntarily declined surgery post-CRT (largely due to long-term quality of life concerns), and 5 (8.1%) failed to advance for unknown reasons. Four of the 16 patients who voluntarily declined surgery after CRT received less than 50 Gy. The 22.2% of CRT/S+ patients achieved pathologic complete response (21.6% for adenocarcinoma and 29.0% for squamous cell carcinoma).

Conclusions

Our institution's 78% surgery completion rate among TMT-indicated patients highlights the benefits of upfront multidisciplinary care. Metastatic disease development most commonly truncated TMT with a low rate failing due to medical decompensation. Given the number of patients who voluntarily declined surgery following CRT, TMT counseling and involvement of a patient advocate are paramount prior to treatment planning.

Low- vs. High-Dose Neoadjuvant Radiation in Trimodality Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal dose of neoadjuvant radiation for locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer remains controversial in the absence of randomized clinical trials, with conventional practice favoring the use of 50.4 vs. 41.4 Gy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of adults with non-metastatic esophageal cancer in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing 41.4, 45, or 50.4 Gy. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included T and N downstaging and perioperative mortality adjusted for demographics, clinicopathologic factors, and facility volume.

RESULTS

Eight thousand eight hundred eighty-one patients were included: 439 (4.9%) received low-dose (41.4 Gy), 2194 (24.7%) received moderate-dose (45 Gy), and 6248 (70.4%) received high-dose (50.4 Gy) neoadjuvant radiation. Compared to high-dose, low-dose radiation was associated with superior median overall survival (52.6 vs. 40.7 months) and 5-year survival (48.3% vs. 40.2%), and lower unadjusted 90-day mortality (2.3% vs. 6.5%, all p ≤ 0.01). Multivariable proportional hazards models confirmed an increased hazard of death associated with high-dose radiation therapy (HR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.10-1.72, p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in T and/or N downstaging between low-dose vs. high-dose therapy (p > 0.1 for both). Patients receiving 45 Gy exhibited the lowest median overall survival (37.2 months) and 5-year survival (38.7%, log-rank p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to 50.4 Gy, 41.4 Gy is associated with reduced perioperative mortality and superior overall survival with similar downstaging in locally advanced esophageal cancer. In the absence of randomized clinical data, our findings support the use of 41.4 Gy in patients with chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy. Prospective trials are warranted to further validate these results.

Radiation dose in neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer: patterns of care and outcomes from the National Cancer Data Base

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) may utilize a wide variety of RT doses, without clear consensus to date. This study evaluated national practice patterns between lower dose (LD) (40-41.4 Gy) or higher dose (HD) (50-50.4 Gy) therapy, in addition to differences in survival and postoperative events.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried [2004-2013] for patients with newly-diagnosed cT1a-T4aN0/N+M0 EC that received neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy. Multivariable logistic regression determined factors predictive of receiving LD RT. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Propensity score matching assessed groups in a balanced manner while reducing indication biases.

Results

Altogether, 5,025 patients met inclusion criteria; 257 (5%) received LD RT, while 4,768 (95%) received HD RT. LD RT was more likely delivered at academic centers (P=0.038), in more recent years (2009-2013, P=0.011), and to squamous cell carcinomas (P=0.001). HD RT tended to be administered with higher T stage as well as node-positive disease (P<0.05). The median OS in the LD and HD cohorts was 39.0 vs. 35.6 months (P=0.072), and 39.0 vs. 42.7 months after propensity matching (P=0.812). Dose did not independently correlate with OS on multivariate analysis (P=0.069), but treatment at academic centers correlated with improved OS (P=0.028). There were no differences between groups in the rates of 30-day readmission (P=0.182), 30-day mortality (P=0.314), or length of postoperative hospital stay (P=0.665), but the LD group experienced lower 90-day mortality (P=0.007).

Conclusions

Although neoadjuvant LD CRT has been underutilized for EC in the United States, it is rising in more recent years. Dose did not significantly impact survival before or after propensity matching, nor did it independently predict for survival. Treatment at academic facilities independently correlated with higher survival, which has implications for patient counseling.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil is associated with increased pathologic complete response and improved survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer

Trimodal therapy consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy has become the standard of care in North America for locally advanced esophageal cancer. While cisplatin/5-fluorouracil has been a common concurrent chemotherapy regimen since the 1980s, its utilization has declined in recent years as the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) trial regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel has become widely adopted. The efficacy of the CROSS regimen compared to alternate chemotherapy choices, however, has rarely been evaluated when each is used as a component of a trimodal treatment approach. The aim of this study is to report our institutional experience with these two concurrent chemotherapy regimens at a specialized esophageal cancer center.We performed an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional foregut registry from a single National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. Esophageal cancer patients who completed trimodal therapy with a chemotherapy regimen of either carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluorouracil were identified and divided into groups based on their chemotherapy regimens. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze pathologic complete response rates, while the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate recurrence-free and overall survival. Analytical models were adjusted for age, clinical stage, radiation dose, histologic subtype (adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma), and time interval from completion of neoadjuvant therapy to surgery.One hundred and forty-two patients treated between January of 2000 and July of 2015 were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. Of this group, 87 had received the CROSS regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel, while 55 had completed cisplatin/5-fluorouracil. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil.group had an increased odds of pathologic complete response (odds ratio = 2.68, 95% confidence interval, P = 0.032), as well as significantly improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.73, P = 0.003) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.87, P = 0.016), compared to the carboplatin/paclitaxel group.Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response and improved recurrence-free and overall survival compared to the CROSS regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel. This suggests that, for select patients, alternate neoadjuvant chemotherapy approaches, such as cisplatin/5-fluorouracil, merit reconsideration as potential primary treatment choices in the management of this highly morbid disease.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios can Predict Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

We hypothesized that serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may predict pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients. The ability to predict favorable treatment response to therapy may aid in determining optimal treatment regimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective esophageal disease registry was conducted. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was defined as the pre-chemoradiotherapy serum neutrophil count divided by lymphocyte count. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was similarly defined. Logistic regression was applied to analyze these ratios and their effect on pathologic complete response. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze survival.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio were both negative predictors of pathologic complete response (odds ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.89, P = 0.037 and odds ratio: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.028, respectively). Only platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was predictive of decreased overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.16, P = 0.40).

CONCLUSION

Elevated neutrophil and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios were significant predictors of a poor treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy. Only elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was predictive of worse overall survival. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may offer a simple serum test to assess the likelihood of a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

Specific gene expression profiles are associated with a pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Predicting treatment response to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer remains an unrealized goal despite studies linking constellations of genes to prognosis. We aimed to determine if specific expression profiles are associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant CRT.

METHODS

Eleven genes previously associated with esophageal cancer prognosis were identified. Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT and esophagectomy were included. Patients were classified into two groups: pCR and no-or-incomplete response (NR). Polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate gene expression. Omnibus testing was applied to overall gene expression differences between groups, and log-rank tests compared individual genes.

RESULTS

Eleven pCR and eighteen NR patients were analyzed. Combined expression profiles were significantly different between pCR and NR groups (p < 0.01). The gene CCL28 was over-expressed in pCR patients (Log-HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 0.46-2.59, p = 0.005), and DKK3 was under-expressed in pCR (Log-HR: -1.03 95%CI: -1.97, -0.10, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

EAC tumors that demonstrated a pCR have genetic profiles that are significantly different from typical NR profiles. The genes CCL28 and DKK3 are potential predictors of treatment response.