'They say you can get addicted': Exploring factors that fuel the fear of addiction to prescription opioids among cancer survivors

Patient-Related Barriers to Chronic Pain Management Among Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Synthesis

Purpose : Cancer survivors often experience chronic pain, impacting their daily functioning and quality of life. Despite the existence of effective pain management therapies, cancer survivors may not experience adequate pain management related to patient-related barriers. This review aims to explore the patient-related barriers that inhibit effective chronic pain management among cancer survivors. Methods : A narrative synthesis was conducted using a systematic review of the literature. Abstract and full-text screening, along with quality appraisal and level of evidence assessments, were conducted. Data was extracted on each study's approach, methods, results, and implications, and thematic analysis was used to synthesize the findings. Results : A total of 330 participants were included in the 11 papers reviewed. General barriers to chronic pain management included a lack of preparedness for chronic pain, negative perceptions toward chronic pain, and poor patient-provider communication. Opioid-specific barriers were identified and included opioid use disorder stigma, knowledge deficits about opioid-related terms, and undesirable side effects. Physical activity barriers included logistical considerations, symptom-related restrictions, and cognitive challenges. Conclusions : Patient-related barriers to chronic pain management among cancer survivors include general, opioid-related, and physical activity-related barriers. Among these, the most significant barriers were negative perceptions toward chronic pain, inadequate patient-provider communication, opioid-related stigma, undesirable side effects of opioids, and symptom-related barriers to physical activity. Implications : Healthcare providers, cancer survivors, and caregivers require more education on communication techniques, the biopsychosocial model of pain, and opioid use disorder. Social support interventions could also be developed to promote engagement in physical activity among cancer survivors.

Early postoperative core symptoms and their relationship with resilience in oesophageal cancer patients-A multicentre cross-sectional study

AIM

To assess early postoperative core symptoms in oesophageal cancer patients and their relationship with resilience.

BACKGROUND

Patients with oesophageal cancer face a high number of severe symptoms in the early post-operative period and require the development of an effective symptom management programme. Identifying core symptoms through network analysis helps in accurate patient care.

DESIGN

A multicentre cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from August 2022 to August 2023 at three hospitals in Anhui Province, China. A total of 469 patients were recruited for this study and 418 (89.1%) patients completed this investigation. Using network analysis to find early post-operative core symptoms in oesophageal cancer patients. Multiple linear regression was used to analyse resilience factors affecting core symptoms.

RESULTS

Sadness was the most core symptom in oesophageal cancer patients in the early post-operative period (rs = 1.41), followed by incision pain and difficulty breathing while resting (rs = 1.20, rs = 1.08). Resilience was significantly associated with patients' feelings of sadness, with optimism having the greatest impact on sadness (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Sadness is the most core symptom in patients in the early post-operative period and special attention should be paid to improving their level of resilience. Local symptoms and dysfunction in the early post-operative period should be treated in a synergistic manner.

IMPACT

This study identifies core symptoms and their relationship to resilience in patients with oesophageal cancer in the early post-operative period. Symptoms as the main core symptom in patients in the early post-operative period, which was sadness and was significantly associated with resilience. Precise interventions can be made to target patients' core post-operative symptoms, which can help improve the effectiveness of symptom management.

REPORTING METHOD

We have complied with the relevant EQUATOR research reporting checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution in the study.

Cancer-related pain experienced in daily life is difficult to communicate and to manage - for patients and for professionals

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to gain qualitative insight into cancer patients' experiences, explanations, and management strategies regarding their cancer-related pain (CP).

METHODS

Seventeen patients with CP were interviewed using a semi-structured interview approach. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis method was used to analyze the transcribed interviews. The patients all participated in cancer rehabilitation courses arranged by the research clinic at The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: (1) Explaining CP: Patients found it difficult to explain how they experienced their pain. They lacked words, and they frequently used invasive metaphors such as "Pain feels like a heart attack" (2). Strategies and barriers to the management of CP: Initiatives provided by healthcare professionals (HCPs) were perceived as insufficient, and the patients missed guidance in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to pain management. Several saw medicine as unnatural for their body, and they focused on side effects and the medicine affecting their quality of life. (3) Responsibility for managing CP: A lack of responsiveness from the HCPs and taking on responsibility for pain management were experienced by several of the patients. The patients expressed uncertainty about whom to contact for help with the management of their CP.

CONCLUSION

The patients' difficulties in explaining, understanding, and communicating their pain and pain management contributed to insufficient pain management. They were also uncertain about who had the responsibility to help them to achieve pain relief. These results share the evidence drawn from studies on patients with chronic non-cancer pain. This qualitative study highlights the need for having more focus on a common language and shared understanding between patients and HCPs. It also underpins the importance of HCPs to assume their responsibility to help patients manage their pain conditions.

Managing Chronic Pain in Cancer Survivorship: Communication Challenges and Opportunities as Described by Cancer Survivors

OBJECTIVES

Many cancer survivors experience chronic pain after completing curative-intent treatment. Based on available data, chronic pain may be undertreated in this context; however, little is known about cancer survivors' experiences with clinical management of chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to better understand cancer survivors' pain management experiences after curative-intent treatment.

METHODS

We conducted 13 semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of cancer survivors who had completed treatment for stage I-III breast, head/neck, lung or colorectal cancer. We used a thematic approach to qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

Participants described that chronic pain often goes unrecognized by their providers, potentially due to limitations in how pain is assessed clinically and the tendency of both cancer survivors and providers to minimize or invalidate the pain experience. To improve communication, participants suggested that providers ask more open-ended questions about their pain, help them to establish functional goals, and provide patients with options for pain management.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

This study demonstrates the importance of provider-initiated communication around pain management for cancer survivors to make them feel more supported in their care. Communication and shared decision-making interventions may improve cancer survivor-provider communication around chronic pain management, addressing an important gap in survivorship care.