Determining the need for a breast cancer awareness educational intervention for women with mild/moderate levels of intellectual disability: A qualitative descriptive study

Preventive breast health care, an embarrassing subject for women with intellectual disability

BackgroundWomen with intellectual disability run an increased risk of dying of breast cancer compared to the general population. There is a clear connection between late detection and low participation in the mammogram screening program. This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of breast health care in women with intellectual disability.MethodSemi-structured interviews were performed individually and in small groups among 11 women with intellectual disability in Sweden.ResultsBreast cancer screening is not adapted to women with intellectual disability. Insufficient support and disrespectful treatment can cause ignorance, fear and anxiety. Familiarity with processes and personal networks are examples of improvement in participation.ConclusionPreventive breast health care is a sensitive topic for many women with intellectual disability that needs to be addressed. Preventive breast health care needs to be more inclusive and better adapted. Personal networks must not determine the possibility of preventive care.

A systematic review of educational interventions to enhance cancer awareness and screening in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A mixed-methods approach

BACKGROUND

Cancer awareness and screening among individuals with intellectual disabilities face unique challenges. To bridge this gap, educational interventions have been developed.

AIMS

This review comprehensively analyzes educational interventions aimed at enhancing cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs). It addresses key questions regarding intervention types and effectiveness, influencing factors, and recommendations for impactful programs.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A robust search strategy was deployed across reputable databases yielding 2512 articles. After meticulous screening and eligibility assessments, eight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing qualitative research, a feasibility study, and randomized control trials.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

The studies employed diverse interventions and assessment methods, leading to varying outcomes. Interventions included educational materials, communication packs, health education DVDs, and healthcare professional support, typically delivered over a short period with limited follow-up. Assessment methods comprised surveys, interviews, and knowledge surveys. However, a comprehensive evaluation of knowledge gains and screening uptake was often absent. While some studies reported modest increases in knowledge, none measured actual screening uptake and long-term effects. The strengths and limitations of these studies underscore the need for more comprehensive research in this area, considering factors such as sample size, study design, and long-term impact.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights into educational interventions for cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities. Its comprehensive methodology and findings underscore the significance of tailoring interventions, extending their duration, and involving caregivers to optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Cancer Prevention in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Literature Review of Caregiver Perspectives in Institutional and Home Care Settings

Background: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs) face unique challenges in accessing cancer prevention measures. Caregivers play a crucial role in facilitating these measures, yet their perspectives are under-researched. Methods: This systematic literature review explores caregiver perspectives on cancer prevention for adults with IDs in institutional and home care settings, aiming to understand their roles, knowledge, and challenges. Thirteen articles from the UK, the USA, Canada, and Ireland were analyzed through thematic synthesis. Four overarching themes were identified: breast cancer screening perspectives, caregivers' knowledge and barriers to cancer prevention, caregivers' perspectives, and cultural context and decision-making. Results: Caregivers, including healthcare professionals and family members, are essential in facilitating breast cancer screening for individuals with IDs. Challenges include explaining screening procedures, limited awareness, and logistical barriers, highlighting the need for targeted educational interventions. Disparities in access underscore the necessity for comprehensive training programs. Healthcare professionals' perspectives reveal existing disparities and suggest interventions for improved accessibility and understanding. Cultural context influences decision-making, emphasizing the importance of culturally sensitive care. The role of family caregivers in decision-making necessitates empowering and supporting them through tailored interventions. Conclusions: This review provides insights into the challenges and opportunities in cancer prevention for individuals with IDs, suggesting the need for educational interventions, training programs, and systemic changes to address disparities. It lays the groundwork for future research and the development of holistic and inclusive strategies in this critical healthcare domain.

Cancer risk-factor and symptom awareness among adults with intellectual disabilities, paid and unpaid carers, and healthcare practitioners: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The physical health of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) has been identified as an area of ongoing concern and priority. Research has increasingly focused on cancer, with studies indicating that people with ID are at an increased risk of cancer and of mortality, compared with the general population. This review aims to systematically identify and synthesise the published academic literature exploring cancer risk-factor and symptom awareness among people with IDs, carers and healthcare professionals.

METHODS

In line with Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework for scoping reviews, five incremental stages were followed: (1) identifying research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) extracting and charting of data, and (5) collating, summarising and reporting results. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-Scr).

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 352 records, 16 records met all eligibility criteria and were included for review. The studies address a range of areas including knowledge and awareness of cancer risk-factors and symptoms and interventions to promote awareness of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer risk-factor and symptom awareness is low among adults with ID, paid and unpaid carers and healthcare practitioners (HCPs). Theoretically underpinned, co-designed tools and interventions to improve awareness are lacking. There is uncertainty surrounding how to best support people with ID in raising cancer awareness, even within the professional healthcare environment. There is a predominance of research on breast cancer awareness. Future studies focusing on other cancers are needed to build a complete picture of awareness among adults with IDs, paid and unpaid carers, and HCPs.