Intraventricular Isovolumic Relaxation Flow Patterns Studied by Using Vector Flow Mapping

Quantitative Analysis of Left Ventricular Flow Dynamics in Latent Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Vector Flow Mapping

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess left ventricular (LV) energy loss (EL), circulation and vortex area using vector flow mapping (VFM) in patients with latent obstructive hyper-trophic cardiomyopathy (LOHCM) and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM).

METHODS

Fourteen LOHCM patients, 10 NOHCM patients, and 11 healthy individuals were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. An offline VFM workstation was used to analyze the LV blood flow patterns and fluid dynamics. The hemodynamic parameters, EL, circulation, and vortex area in 7 cardiac phases were calculated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with controls and NOHCM patients, EL was significantly higher in -LOHCM patients during the rapid ejection phase, slow ejection (SE) phase, and isovolumetric relaxation phase (p < 0.05). LOHCM patients also showed increased circulation during SE compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05). The ability to discriminate between NOHCM and LOHCM was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), and EL during SE was found to have the largest AUC (0.964); the best cutoff value was 6.34 J/m3/s, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

The VFM technique can detect abnormal changes of LV EL and vortex characteristics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Compared with controls and NOHCM patients, the LOHCM patients have worse systolic and diastolic functions.

Relationship between left ventricular isovolumic relaxation flow patterns and mitral inflow patterns studied by using vector flow mapping

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between isovolumic relaxation flow (IRF) patterns in left ventricle (LV) and mitral inflow patterns. Color Doppler loops were acquired for vector flow mapping in apical long-axis view in 57 patients with coronary artery disease, 31 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, and 58 healthy controls. IRF patterns were classified into three categories: pattern A, apically directed flow; pattern B, bidirectional flow with small scattered vortices; and pattern C, a large vortex. All normals and patients with normal LV filling (n = 10) showed pattern A. Patients with impaired relaxation consisted of 31 (66%) patients having pattern A, 11 (23%) having pattern B, and 5 (11%) having pattern C. Patients with pseudonormal filling included 4 (31%) patients having pattern A, 7 (54%) having pattern B, and 2 (15%) having pattern C. In patients with restrictive filling, 14 (78%) showed pattern C, 4 (22%) showed pattern B, and no patient showed pattern A. IRF patterns were associated with LV filling patterns (χ² = 52.026, p < 0.001). There are significant relationships between LV filling and IRF patterns. IRF patterns may provide an index for evaluation of LV diastolic function.

Relationship between left ventricular vortex and preejectional flow velocity during isovolumic contraction studied by using vector flow mapping

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the vortex in left ventricle (LV) during the isovolumic contraction (IVC) period and the preejectional flow velocity in LV outflow tract (V_LVOT ).

METHODS

Color Doppler loops were acquired for vector flow mapping in apical long-axis view in 76 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, 61 patients with coronary artery disease and 36 healthy controls.

RESULTS

All normals exhibited an IVC vortex reaching the LV base. V_LVOT was significantly related to IVC vortex area flux, transmitral A velocity, mitral annular a' velocity and E/e' ratio, respectively. Transmitral A velocity was the only independent predictor of V_LVOT (R²  = 0.292, P = 0.001). In patients the IVC vortex could reach the LV base, middle, or apex. V_LVOT was significantly related to range, area and area flux of the IVC vortex, LV size, LVEF, mitral annular velocities, E/e' ratio, transmitral A velocity, and IVC time, respectively. Range and corrected area flux of the IVC vortex, LV end-systolic short diameter, and IVC time were independent predictors of V_LVOT (R²  = 0.608, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In normals, the transmitral A velocity (momentum) is efficiently transferred from mitral orifice to LV outflow tract by a normally formed IVC vortex, and transmitral A velocity is the only independent predictor of V_LVOT . However, in patients with a wide range of LV enlargement and dysfunction, the momentum transfer is associated with not only the LV dimension and function, but also the range and volume of the IVC vortex.

Vector flow mapping analysis of left ventricular energetic performance in healthy adult volunteers

BACKGROUND

Vector flow mapping, a novel flow visualization echocardiographic technology, is increasing in popularity. Energy loss reference values for children have been established using vector flow mapping, but those for adults have not yet been provided. We aimed to establish reference values in healthy adults for energy loss, kinetic energy in the left ventricular outflow tract, and the energetic performance index (defined as the ratio of kinetic energy to energy loss over one cardiac cycle).

METHODS

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in fifty healthy volunteers, and the stored images were analyzed to calculate energy loss, kinetic energy, and energetic performance index and obtain ranges of reference values for these.

RESULTS

Mean energy loss over one cardiac cycle ranged from 10.1 to 59.1 mW/m (mean ± SD, 27.53 ± 13.46 mW/m), with a reference range of 10.32 ~ 58.63 mW/m. Mean systolic energy loss ranged from 8.5 to 80.1 (23.52 ± 14.53) mW/m, with a reference range of 8.86 ~ 77.30 mW/m. Mean diastolic energy loss ranged from 7.9 to 86 (30.41 ± 16.93) mW/m, with a reference range of 8.31 ~ 80.36 mW/m. Mean kinetic energy in the left ventricular outflow tract over one cardiac cycle ranged from 200 to 851.6 (449.74 ± 177.51) mW/m with a reference range of 203.16 ~ 833.15 mW/m. The energetic performance index ranged from 5.3 to 37.6 (18.48 ± 7.74), with a reference range of 5.80 ~ 36.67.

CONCLUSIONS

Energy loss, kinetic energy, and energetic performance index reference values were defined using vector flow mapping. These reference values enable the assessment of various cardiac conditions in any clinical situation.