Posaconazole oral dose and plasma levels in pediatric hematology-oncology patients

Relationship between posaconazole concentrations and clinical outcomes in paediatric cancer and haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Posaconazole is used to prevent and treat invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in immunocompromised children, including those undergoing cancer treatment or HSCT. Despite differences in pharmacokinetics and IFI epidemiology between children and adults, therapeutic targets established in adult studies are often applied to children.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review evaluated the correlation between serum posaconazole concentrations and clinical outcomes of IFI prophylaxis and treatment in children with malignancies or HSCT recipients.

METHODS

Four databases (Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed) were searched for studies involving children (≤18 years old) receiving cancer treatment or HSCT that reported posaconazole serum concentrations and treatment outcomes. Animal studies, those primarily in adult (>18 years old) populations, non-malignant conditions (excluding HSCT), case reports, letters, editorials, conference abstracts and narrative reviews were excluded. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included: 12 reported outcomes of posaconazole prophylaxis; two of treatment; and five of both. For prophylaxis, breakthrough IFIs occurred in 1%-12% of children. All but one occurred with serum concentrations of ≤0.7 mg/L. For treatment, no clear association was observed between a trough concentration of >1.0 mg/L and treatment efficacy, with poor outcomes reported for serum concentrations ranging between 0.2 and 4.8 mg/L. Overall, quality of evidence was poor (medium to high risk of bias for 18 papers, low risk for 1 paper) and there was variation in IFI definitions across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review supports current recommendations for posaconazole prophylaxis in paediatric oncology and HSCT recipients. The absence of a clear correlation found between serum trough concentrations and treatment efficacy highlights the need for further studies to determine optimal therapeutic targets for treatment.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Refine Dosing of Posaconazole in Young Children

PURPOSE

Posaconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal for treating and preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in immunocompromised individuals, including children as young as 2 years. Available in delayed-release (DR) oral suspension, intravenous formulation, and older immediate-release (IR) formulation (off-label in younger children), dosing harmonization across age groups and formulations remains inconsistent. This inconsistency arises from the unique physiology of young children and posaconazole's pH-dependent absorption. Limited pharmacokinetic (PK) data for children under 2 years complicates dosing, as absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion processes are underdeveloped and age-dependent. This work aims to harmonize pediatric dosing for children aged 2 to 7 years and extend dosing guidance for those aged 6 months to 2 years using physiologically-based PK (PBPK) modeling.

METHODS

An adult PBPK model was created using posaconazole's physicochemical properties and ADME characteristics with virtual populations from PK-Sim. Calibrated with single-dose data from healthy subjects, the model was verified by predicting PK following multiple doses in adults at risk for IFIs. The model was then scaled to children, accounting for developmental anatomy and physiology, including UGT1A4 ontogeny. The pediatric model was evaluated against observed data from children aged 2 to 7 years. Simulations were conducted to harmonize dosing across formulations and extend dosing to children as young as 6 months, acknowledging standard plasma concentration targets for treatment of IFIs (1000 ng/mL) as well as prophylaxis (700 ng/mL).

FINDINGS

The pediatric model adequately captured observed PK data from literature following all three formulations. The IR oral suspension is impractical and likely subtherapeutic for most children under 7 years due to solubility limits. Intravenous doses of 11-13 mg/kg once daily (QD) may be optimal for treatment, and 8 to 9 mg/kg QD for prophylaxis, varying by age. Oral DR suspension doses of 12 to 14 mg/kg QD for treatment and 8.5 to 10 mg/kg QD for prophylaxis may be optimal, also age-dependent. Dividing the total daily dose by a factor of 0.7 and administering twice daily can achieve similar trough levels.

IMPLICATIONS

PBPK modeling for posaconazole bridges the gap between PK principles and clinical practice, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes and minimizing risks associated with inadequate dosing in pediatric patients.

Efficacy and safety of posaconazole and liposomal amphotericin B use for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in a paediatric and young adult haemato-oncological population

BACKGROUND

The prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is crucial for paediatric haemato-oncological patients. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and side-effects of posaconazole and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) as primary prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cohort study included patients aged 3 months to 21 years who received posaconazole or L-AmB (5 mg/kg twice weekly) as prophylaxis from January 2017 to March 2022 at the Hemato-oncological Pediatric Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Italy. Outcomes included adverse events and IFI diagnoses after the start of prophylaxis. Separate analyses were performed for patients with ALL and non-ALL diagnoses, and high-risk and low-risk groups. Cumulative incidence was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with significant differences assessed using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients received posaconazole, and 37 received L-AmB. Adverse events occurred in 26% of L-AmB patients and 5.6% of posaconazole patients. IFI breakthrough events were similar in both groups (four events each). In ALL patients, 41% experienced adverse events with L-AmB, compared to 5% with posaconazole. After 1 year, the probability of adverse events was lower in the posaconazole group (54% versus 65%, P < 0.001). Overall, posaconazole was associated with a 91% lower risk of adverse events (HR: 0.07, P < 0.001). Among high-risk patients, IFI breakthrough rates were similar between groups (P = 0.964).

CONCLUSIONS

Posaconazole was associated with fewer adverse events than L-AmB, and both drugs showed similar efficacy in preventing IFI breakthroughs, making posaconazole a viable alternative for primary prophylaxis.

Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Pediatric Patients with Oncohematological Disorders-A Single-Centre Study

INTRODUCTION

Posaconazole is recommended for prophylaxis in pediatric immunocompromised patients. Due to its variability in bioavailability and drug-to-drug interactions, EBMT recommends regimens based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 171 oncohematological pediatric patients on posaconazole prophylaxis were included. Full pharmacokinetic posaconazole profiles were assessed in 51 children. The efficacy and safety of posaconazole was evaluated by measuring the drug concentration, with dose modification attempted in patients with suboptimal results. The influence of modifying factors on the posaconazole plasma concentration (PPC) was investigated.

RESULTS

An insufficient PPC was the main issue, but no significant increase in prophylaxis failure was reported. The modification of the dosage resulted in the optimization of PPC in 50% of patients. No significant correlation between age, gender, diagnosis or the posaconazole dosage and the PPC was found. HCT, total parenteral nutrition and diarrhea were associated with a lower PPC. Hypoalbuminemia was related to both higher and lower PPC. The concomitant administration of specified drugs significantly impacted the PPC.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM allows the identification of patients receiving non-optimal treatment and offers an opportunity to improve the efficacy and safety of the therapy. However, further research involving larger patient groups and longer observation periods are needed to determine the optimal dosing and target PPC in pediatric patients.

Posaconazole in paediatric malignancy and haematopoietic stem cell transplant: dosing to achieve therapeutic concentration

OBJECTIVES

Posaconazole is increasingly used for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised children. We aimed to review evidence for paediatric posaconazole dosing regimens focusing on attainment of target concentrations and frequency of adverse effects.

METHODS

In May 2023, the Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for articles reporting posaconazole dosing in children with malignancy or post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Studies reporting the attainment of target serum concentrations were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 studies were included. Eighteen studies of the oral suspension consistently reported poor attainment of target concentrations for prophylaxis (≥0.7 µg/mL, 12%-78%) despite high daily doses of 14-23 mg/kg/day (max. 1200 mg/day). Target attainment was significantly affected by gastric pH and food intake. Six studies of the delayed-release tablet (DRT) reported 58%-94% achieved concentrations ≥0.7 µg/mL, with the majority using lower doses of 4-12 mg/kg/day (max. 300 mg/day). Similarly, one study of powder for oral suspension found 67%-100% achieved target concentrations with a dose of 6 mg/kg/day (max. 300 mg/day). As expected, the IV formulation had high attainment of prophylaxis targets (81%-90%) with 6-10 mg/kg/day (max. 400 mg/day). All formulations were well tolerated, and no relationship between adverse effects and posaconazole concentrations was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The required posaconazole dose in immunocompromised children varies depending on the formulation. The IV infusion had the highest attainment of therapeutic concentration followed by the DRT and powder for suspension. By contrast, the oral suspension had low attainment of target concentrations despite higher daily doses.

Antifungal Drug-Drug Interactions with Commonly Used Pharmaceutics in European Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Leukemia is one of the leading childhood malignancies, with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) being the most common type. Invasive fungal disease is a concerning problem also at pediatric hemato-oncology units. Available guidelines underline the need for antifungal prophylaxis and give recommendations for proper treatment in various clinical scenarios. Nonetheless, antifungal agents are often involved in drug-drug interaction (DDI) occurrence. The prediction of those interactions in the pediatric population is complicated because of the physiological differences in adults, and the lack of pharmacological data. In this review, we discuss the potential DDIs between antifungal agents and commonly used pharmaceutics in pediatric hemato-oncology settings, with special emphasis on the use of liposomal amphotericin B and ALL treatment. We obtained information from Micromedex^® and Drugs.com^® interaction checking databases and checked the EudraVigilance^® database to source the frequency of severe adverse drug reactions that resulted from antifungal drug interactions. Several major DDIs were identified, showing a favorable safety profile of echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B. Interestingly, although there are numerous available drug interaction checking tools facilitating the identification of potential serious DDIs, it is important to use more than one tool, as the presented searching results may differ between particular checking programs.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Posaconazole in Immune-Compromised Children and Assessment of Target Attainment in Invasive Fungal Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Posaconazole (PSZ) is a triazole antifungal for the management of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in adults and children. Although PSZ is available as an intravenous (IV) solution, oral suspension (OS) and delayed-release tablets (DRTs), OS is the preferred formulation for pediatric use because of potential safety concerns associated with an excipient in the IV formulation and difficulty in swallowing intact tablets by children. However, poor biopharmaceutical characteristics of the OS formulation leads to an unpredictable dose-exposure profile of PSZ in children, potentially risking therapeutic failure. The goal of this study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of PSZ in immunocompromised children and assess therapeutic target attainment.

METHODS

Serum concentrations of PSZ were collected retrospectively from records of hospitalized patients. A population PK analysis was performed in a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling framework with NONMEM (v7.4). The PK parameters were scaled to body weight, then potential covariate effects were assessed. The final PK model was used to evaluate recommended dosing schemes through simulation of target attainment (as a percentage of the population having steady-state trough concentrations above the recommended target) using Simulx (v2021R1).

RESULTS

Repeated measurement data of 202 serum concentrations of total PSZ were acquired from 47 immunocompromised patients between 1 and 21 years of age receiving PSZ either intravenously or orally, or both. A one-compartment PK model with first-order absorption and linear elimination best fit the data. The estimated absolute bioavailability (95% confidence interval) for suspension (Fs) was 16% (8-27%), which was significantly lower than the reported tablet bioavailability (Ft) [67%]. Fs was reduced by 62% and 75% upon concomitant administration with pantoprazole (PAN) and omeprazole (OME), respectively. Famotidine resulted in a reduction of Fs by only 22%. Both fixed dosing and weight-based adaptive dosing provided adequate target attainment when PAN or OME were not coadministered with the suspension.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study revealed that both fixed and weight-based adaptive dosing schemes can be appropriate for target attainment across all PSZ formulations, including suspension. Additionally, covariate analysis suggests that concomitant proton pump inhibitors should be contraindicated during PSZ suspension dosing.

Population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in Chinese pediatric patients with acute leukaemia: effect of food on bioavailability and dose optimization

This study aimed to investigate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole suspension in pediatric patients with acute leukaemia and to recommend optimal dosing strategies. This single-site, prospective, open-label, observational study was conducted in 42 patients and included 186 plasma concentrations of posaconazole. Sparse data were analyzed using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to predict the morning trough concentrations at steady-state with the proposed dose of 2-7 mg/kg three times daily (tid) or four times daily (qid) for bodyweights of 10-36 kg. The target concentrations were 700 ng/mL for prophylaxis and 1000 ng/mL for treatment. Dosage regimens with percentage of target attainment (PTA) ≥70% were recommended. A one-compartment model with allometric scaling adequately described the pharmacokinetic profile. The apparent clearance was 9.05 L/h (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.14-11.09) and the apparent volume of distribution was 283 L (95% CI 168-491) for a typical individual of 17.5 kg. The relative bioavailability with high-fat diet was as high as 1.95-fold compared with regular food. Following the intake of regular meals, 4 mg/kg qid was adequate with a PTA ≥ 71.8% for prophylaxis. A dosage of 6 mg/kg qid under a regular diet reached a PTA ≥ 73.4% for treatment. The recommended dosage of posaconazole for prophylaxis and treatment could be predicted by the pharmacokinetic model based on bodyweight and diet type in pediatric patients.

Challenges in the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Immunocompromised Children

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Voriconazole remains the drug of choice for the treatment of IA in children; however, the complex kinetics of voriconazole in children make dosing challenging and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) essential for treatment success. The overarching goal of this review is to discuss the role of voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, echinocandins, and combination antifungal therapy for the treatment of IA in children. We also provide a detailed discussion of antifungal TDM in children.

Dose Optimisation of Posaconazole and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Pediatric Patients

Experience in the clinical use of posaconazole (PCZ) in pediatric patients is limited, and no specific dose recommendations exist. This study aimed to investigate an appropriate dosing regimen, and assess the exposure-response relationships of PCZ in children. We reviewed the medical records of inpatients aged <18 years who subjected to PCZ concentrations monitoring. Clinical data, PCZ dosing and monitoring data were collected. A total of 375 PCZ trough concentrations (C _min) from 105 pediatric patients were included. For children receiving PCZ for prophylaxis, the median doses required to achieve the therapeutic range at the ages of <6, 6-12 and >12 years were 14.80, 14.52 and 12.90 mg/kg/day, respectively (p = 0.001); and for those receiving PCZ for treatment, the median doses were 23.50, 20.96 and 15.38 mg/kg/day, respectively (p = 0.001). Among children taking PCZ for prophylaxis, 12% developed a proven or probable breakthrough IFIs; the median PCZ concentrations were significantly lower than those children with successful treatment response (0.43 versus 1.20 μg mL^-1; p < 0.001). 79.2% patients taking PCZ for treatment had a positive clinical response, and the median PCZ concentrations were significantly higher than those children with disease progression (1.06 versus 0.53 μg mL^-1; p = 0.024). No association between C _min values and hepatotoxicity was observed. Factors such as age, CRP, ALT and co-administration with proton pump inhibitors exhibited significant effects on PCZ C _min. It is necessary to adjust the dosing regimens based on PCZ C _min to individualize antifungal therapy and provide guidelines for dose adjustment in children.

Consensus guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis in haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, 2021

Antifungal prophylaxis can reduce morbidity and mortality from invasive fungal disease (IFD). However, its use needs to be optimised and appropriately targeted to patients at highest risk to derive the most benefit. In addition to established risks for IFD, considerable recent progress in the treatment of malignancies has resulted in the development of new 'at-risk' groups. The changing epidemiology of IFD and emergence of drug resistance continue to impact choice of prophylaxis, highlighting the importance of active surveillance and knowledge of local epidemiology. These guidelines aim to highlight emerging risk groups and review the evidence and limitations around new formulations of established agents and new antifungal drugs. It provides recommendations around use and choice of antifungal prophylaxis, discusses the potential impact of the changing epidemiology of IFD and emergence of drug resistance, and future directions for risk stratification to assist optimal management of highly vulnerable patients.

Evaluating posaconazole, its pharmacology, efficacy and safety for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Safe and effective antifungal medications used for prophylaxis and treatment are pivotal in their management. Posaconazole is a promising triazole antifungal agent.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss the pharmacological properties of posaconazole, including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability profile, together with efficacy data for prophylaxis and treatment as well as its use in special populations based on current literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Posaconazole has a favorable safety and tolerability profile; however, caution is advised when co-administered with agents that are CYP3A4 inhibitors, because their concentration may significantly increase, and their levels should be closely monitored. It has an extended spectrum of activity against yeasts and filamentous fungi. It is successfully used as prophylaxis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It is the first line treatment for oropharyngeal candidiasis and is also used as a salvage treatment for refractory IFDs. Currently available formulations include the oral suspension, delayed-release tablets and solution for intravenous infusion, all with different PK/PD properties and indications. Its use in children and adolescents is currently being examined in Phase-II clinical trials.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Study of Posaconazole Oral Suspension in Immunocompromised Pediatric Patients: A Short Communication

BACKGROUND

Posaconazole oral suspension emerged as a promising candidate for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised children. Its pharmacodynamic advantages include a broad-spectrum activity and a favorable safety profile; however, they are overshadowed by its large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, which might cause subtherapeutic exposure. The aim of this study was to develop a population (pop) PK model based on rich sampling data to better understand the PK of posaconazole oral suspension in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a prospective interventional study involving hospitalized pediatric patients with a hematologic malignancy and prophylactically treated with posaconazole oral suspension. After constructing the popPK model, the probability of target attainment (PTA; 100% T ≥ 0.7 mg/L) for prophylaxis under fixed, body weight-based, and body surface area-based dosing was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients contributed 112 posaconazole plasma concentrations. The PK of posaconazole was adequately described by a 1-compartment model with lag time 2.71 hours [13%]; nonlinear bioavailability ED50 99.1 mg/m2 (fixed); first-order absorption rate constant 0.325 hour-1 [27%]; apparent volume of distribution 1150 L [34%]; and apparent clearance 15.4 L/h [24%] (∼70-kg individual). The bioavailability decreased in the presence of diarrhea and co-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). The unexplained interindividual variability in posaconazole PK remained large. The PTA was <85%, irrespective of the simulated dosing strategy. Patients without diarrhea and not administered a PPI had the highest PTA (85% under the fixed 300-mg dosing 4 times per day).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended during prophylactic posaconazole therapy in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Large-scale comparative studies are needed to characterize the PK variability between different posaconazole formulations in this cohort.

Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole versus Fluconazole in Children with Neutropenia Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Single Center Experience

Background

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are common and contribute to mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The relative efficacies of posaconazole (POS) and fluconazole (FLU) as primary antifungal prophylaxes are uncertain.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on children treated with allogeneic HSCT who received POS or FLU during the early neutropenic period. The efficacies, safety, and tolerabilities of the prophylaxes were compared.

Results

Data on 78 HSCT recipients were analyzed. Most had thalassemia (58%). Pre-engraftment, POS and FLU were administered to 41 and 37 cases, respectively. There were no proven cases of IFD. However, 2 POS cases and 1 FLU case had probable IFDs. The IFD incidences of the POS (5%) and FLU (3%) groups demonstrated no statistical difference (p = 0.620). Of the 75 surviving cases receiving FLU post-engraftment (including 39 cases previously given POS), 3 had proven IFDs whereas 3 had probable IFDs (total, 6 [8%]) within 1 year post-HSCT. No cases discontinued the prophylaxes due to drug intolerance. The common adverse events with POS and FLU were not significantly different. Only 19% of the patients achieved the therapeutic POS level, with a starting dose of 4 mg/kg thrice daily.

Conclusion

POS and FLU demonstrate comparable levels of effectiveness, safety, and tolerability as IFD prophylaxes for neutropenic children treated with allogeneic HSCT. Determination of the optimum POS dose and duration requires larger studies.

Is Posaconazole Really Effective in Adolescent patients as a Prophylactic Agent: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and death in immunocompromised patients. Data on efficacy and pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in pediatric patients are rare (1 to 5). Herein, we retrospectively analyzed adolescent patients who had received posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who received posaconazole as primary or secondary antifungal prophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 34 adolescent patients, 19 men (55.9%) and 15 women (44.1%) with a mean age of 15.8±2.1 years were included. Twenty-five of 34 (73.5%) patients were on primary and nine of 34 (26.5%) patients were on secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Diagnosis of the patients receiving posaconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis were acute myeloid leukemia (n=12, 48%), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n=7, 28%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=5, 20%), and Fanconi aplastic anemia (n=1, 4%). Five patients (55.6%) with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 1 patient with acute myeloid leukemia (11.1%), 1 patient with Fanconi aplastic anemia (11.1%), and 2 (22.2%) patients with chronic granulomatous disease received posaconazole as secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Twelve of 25 (48%) patients receiving posaconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis were complicated by IFI; 4 of them were proven, 6 probable, and 2 with possible IFI. Three of 9 patients (33.3%) receiving posaconazole as secondary antifungal prophylaxis was complicated by IFI (P=0.29), 2 of them were probable and 1 was possible IFI. Five of 25 patients (20%) receiving posaconazole as primary prophylaxis died because of IFI.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with high risk of invasive infections seems clearly necessary, and analyzing serum posaconazole levels and individualizing dosing may be 1 approach to improve outcomes.

Evaluation of target attainment of oral posaconazole suspension in immunocompromised children

BACKGROUND

Posaconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal that is not licensed for use in children <13 years of age. Despite this and by necessity, it is used extensively in paediatric hospitals for prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether initial prophylactic dosing recommendations attain a posaconazole plasma concentration of ≥700 ng/mL in immunocompromised children <13 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of immunocompromised children <13 years of age receiving posaconazole suspension prophylaxis at a starting dose of 5 mg/kg every 8 h for ≥7 days and who had a posaconazole concentration measured after ≥7 days. Posaconazole plasma concentrations and rate of breakthrough infection were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included with a median age of 5 years (range 3 months to 12 years). The mean posaconazole plasma concentration was 783.4 ng/mL (IQR 428.3-980 ng/mL) and the percentage of patients with a posaconazole plasma concentration ≥700ng/mL was 47.9%. Patients who were on a proton pump inhibitor, a histamine H2 antagonist or metoclopramide, had mucositis or were enterally fed had a lower posaconazole plasma concentration compared with patients without these co-administered drugs/mucositis/enteral feeding (542.3 versus 1069.8 ng/mL; P<0.001). The breakthrough invasive fungal infection rate was 4.3% (3/70).

CONCLUSIONS

The studied 5 mg/kg posaconazole suspension every 8 h resulted in target concentrations in only 47.9% of patients and further studies looking at newer posaconazole formulations are needed.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Posaconazole

Posaconazole is typically used for preventing invasive yeast and mold infections such as invasive aspergillosis in high-risk immunocompromised patients. The oral suspension was the first released formulation and many pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of this formulation have been published. Erratic absorption profiles associated with this formulation were widely reported. Posaconazole exposure was found to be significantly influenced by food and many gastrointestinal conditions, including pH and motility. As a result, low posaconazole plasma concentrations were obtained in large groups of patients. These issues of erratic absorption urged the development of the subsequently marketed delayed-release tablet, which proved to be associated with higher and more stable exposure profiles. Shortly thereafter, an intravenous formulation was released for patients who are not able to take oral formulations. Both new formulations require a loading dose on day 1 to achieve high posaconazole concentrations more quickly, which was not possible with the oral suspension. So far, there appears to be no evidence of increased toxicity correlated to the higher posaconazole exposure achieved with the regimen for these formulations. The higher systemic availability of posaconazole for the delayed-release tablet and intravenous formulation have resulted in these two formulations being preferable for both prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease. This review aimed to integrate the current knowledge on posaconazole pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, major toxicity, existing resistance, clinical experience in special populations, and new therapeutic strategies in order to get a clear understanding of the clinical use of this drug.

Plasma exposures following posaconazole delayed-release tablets in immunocompromised children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Posaconazole is a recommended option for antifungal prophylaxis in paediatric patients >12 years of age. However, little is known about plasma exposures and safety following administration of the delayed-release tablets (DRTs) in children and adolescents.

METHODS

In a retrospective observational study, we analysed steady-state trough concentrations of posaconazole in all paediatric patients who had received the DRT formulation between May 2015 and December 2018 for antifungal prophylaxis. Dosing was guided by a published population pharmacokinetic model with weight-based dosing. Drug concentrations in plasma were measured by a validated tandem MS method. Liver function and drug discontinuations due to adverse effects were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients (21 male, 13 female; median age 12 years, range 5-17 years; median body weight 43.5 kg, range 16-84 kg) undergoing treatment for haemato-oncological disorders (n=23) or immunosuppression for polyarthritis (n=1) or post-allogeneic HSCT (n=11) received posaconazole DRTs for a median of 70 days (range 9-391 days). The median first steady-state trough plasma concentration following model-derived dosing was 1607 ng/mL (range 501-8485 ng/mL) with trough concentrations being above the dosing target of ≥700 ng/mL in 32/34 patients (94%). Considering all (first and subsequent) trough concentrations, target attainment was 90% (63/70 samples). Posaconazole was well tolerated without adverse event-related discontinuations or breakthrough infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of posaconazole DRTs to paediatric patients guided by a population pharmacokinetic-derived dosing algorithm resulted in predictable and potentially effective exposures and was well tolerated over prolonged time periods.

Antifungal Triazole Posaconazole Targets an Early Stage of the Parechovirus A3 Life Cycle

Viruses in species Parechovirus A (Picornaviridae) are associated with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Parechovirus A3 (PeV-A3) is known to cause sepsis-like illness, meningitis, and encephalitis in infants and young children. To date, no specific therapies are available to treat PeV-A3-infected children. We had previously identified two FDA-cleared antifungal drugs, itraconazole (ITC) and posaconazole (POS), with potent and specific antiviral activity against PeV-A3. Time-of-addition and synchronized infection assays revealed that POS targets an early stage of the PeV-A3 life cycle. POS exerts an antiviral effect, evidenced by a reduction in viral titer following the addition of POS to Vero-P cells before infection, coaddition of POS and PeV-A3 to Vero-P cells, incubation of POS and PeV-A3 prior to Vero-P infection, and at attachment. POS exerts less of an effect on virus entry. A PeV-A3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay inhibition experiment, using an anti-PeV-A3 monoclonal antibody, suggested that POS binds directly to the PeV-A3 capsid. POS-resistant PeV-A3 strains developed by serial passage in the presence of POS acquired substitutions in multiple regions of the genome, including the capsid. Reverse genetics confirmed substitutions in capsid proteins VP0, VP3, and VP1 and nonstructural proteins 2A and 3A. Single mutants VP0_K66R, VP0_A124T, VP3_N88S, VP1_Y224C, 2A_S78L, and 3A_T1I were 4-, 9-, 12-, 34-, 51-, and 119-fold more resistant to POS, respectively, than the susceptible prototype strain. Our studies demonstrate that POS may be a valuable tool in developing an antiviral therapy for PeV-A3.

Pharmacological prophylaxis of infection in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients

Introduction: Pediatric patients treated for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk of developing severe infectious complications. The choice of an optimum supportive treatment should be based on local epidemiology, as well as intensity and toxicity of the anti-leukemic therapy applied.Areas covered: This review presents an overview of recently published studies focusing on the prevention of infection in pediatric AML patients. PubMed has been systematically searched for clinical trials, reviews, and meta-analyses published in the last 10 years. The focus of this article will be limited to primary prophylaxis only, while secondary prophylaxis is beyond the scope of the current review.Expert opinion: Although anti-bacterial agents may decrease the bacterial infection burden, there is no consensus regarding prophylactic use. To that end, there is a need for further randomized controlled trials to establish the precise role of anti-bacterial prophylaxis in pediatric AML patients. The prophylactic use of anti-fungal agents is strongly recommended for all AML patients. Since the contribution of hematopoietic growth factors to improved survival has not been demonstrated, they should not be routinely applied. Decisions regarding an appropriate prophylactic strategy should be taken in collaboration with the infectious disease experts and pharmacology team.

Factors Influencing the Safety and Efficiency of Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole in Children with Hematological Diseases: From Genetics to Polypharmacotherapy

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of ABCB1 polymorphism, BMI, age and drug co-administration on safety and efficiency of posaconazole (PCZ) oral suspension treatment in children with hematological diseases. Seventy children were included in the study. ABCB1 polymorphism in fifty-eight children was determined using a PCR–RFLP method. A protocol with data on the health condition, treatment and adverse events (AE), as well as a survey on treatment tolerance for the legal guardians was evaluated. Liver function tests were observed for the first 20 days, and AE during the complete medication period. For statistical analysis a χ² test with Yates’s correction, a Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation test was performed (p < 0.05). Genetic testing showed 24% CC, 46% CT and 30% of TT variants. PCZ prophylaxis failed in twenty cases, where change in prophylactic treatment was needed. Fifty-two children suffered from at least one mild to moderate adverse event. Sixty-five legal guardians completed the survey, most of them reported the treatment to be well tolerated. ABCB1 polymorphism had no impact on AE occurrence and posaconazole prophylaxis efficiency. Age influenced the number of gastrointestinal (p = 0.02), visual (p = 0.05), neurological (p = 0.01), dermatological (p = 0.002) and flu-like (p = 0.02) complications. AST (p = 0.03) and LDH (p = 0.008) activity presented age dependency. The concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) had impact on liver health parameters elevation (p = 0.009) and circulatory system complications (p = 0.008). High incidence of mild to moderate AE, and other factors influencing PCZ pharmacokinetics (PPI co-administration, obesity), suggest a need for careful pediatric onco-hematology patient evaluation.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Second-Generation Triazoles for the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis and Candidiasis

Second-generation triazoles were developed in response to the quest for more efficacious and safer therapeutic options for the treatment of severe systemic aspergillosis and candidiasis. These agents include voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, and ravuconazole. The aim of this review was to present and compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of second-generation triazoles for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and candidiasis, emphasizing their clinical implications. The MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCO, Google Scholar, and SCIndeks databases were searched using advanced search options, including the names of second-generation triazoles and pharmacokinetic terms as keywords. The intravenous administration of voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole results in stable pharmacokinetics of these drugs, with mostly predictable variations influenced by common and usually known factors in routine clinical settings. The high oral bioavailability of isavuconazole and, to some extent, voriconazole makes them suitable for intravenous-to-oral switch strategies. Except for intravenous voriconazole (due to the accumulation of the toxic vehicle hydroxypropyl betadex), dose reduction of second-generation triazoles is not needed in patients with renal failure; patients with hepatic insufficiency require dose reduction only in advanced disease stages. The introduction of therapeutic drug monitoring could aid attempts to optimize the blood concentrations of triazoles and other drugs that are known to or that possibly interact, thus increasing treatment efficacy and safety. There is a need for new studies that are designed to provide useful data on second-generation triazole pharmacokinetics, particularly in special circumstances such as central nervous system and ocular infections, infections in newborns and infants, and in subjects with genetic polymorphisms of metabolizing enzymes.

Advances in the Treatment of Mycoses in Pediatric Patients

The main indications for antifungal drug administration in pediatrics are reviewed as well as an update of the data of antifungal agents and antifungal policies performed. Specifically, antifungal therapy in three main areas is updated as follows: a) Prophylaxis of premature neonates against invasive candidiasis; b) management of candidemia and meningoencephalitis in neonates; and c) prophylaxis, empiric therapy, and targeted antifungal therapy in children with primary or secondary immunodeficiencies. Fluconazole remains the most frequent antifungal prophylactic agent given to high-risk neonates and children. However, the emergence of fluconazole resistance, particularly in non-albicans Candida species, should be considered during preventive or empiric therapy. In very-low birth-weight neonates, although fluconazole is used as antifungal prophylaxis in neonatal intensive care units (NICU's) with relatively high incidence of invasive candidiasis (IC), its role is under continuous debate. Amphotericin B, primarily in its liposomal formulation, remains the mainstay of therapy for treating neonatal and pediatric yeast and mold infections. Voriconazole is indicated for mold infections except for mucormycosis in children >2 years. Newer triazoles-such as posaconazole and isavuconazole-as well as echinocandins, are either licensed or under study for first-line or salvage therapy, whereas combination therapy is kept for refractory cases.