Selective contrast-enhanced computed tomography is appropriate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma therapy response assessment

Prognostic impact of abdominal lymph node involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Objective

The prognostic value of site of nodal involvement in diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCL) is mainly unknown. We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of nodal abdominal involvement in relation to tumour cell markers and clinical characteristics of 249 DLBCL patients in a retrospective single‐centre study.

Methods

Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and thorax revealed pathologically enlarged abdominal lymph nodes in 156 patients, while in 93 patients there were no pathologically enlarged lymph nodes in the abdomen. In 81 cases, the diagnosis of DLBCL was verified by histopathological biopsy obtained from abdominal lymph node.

Results

Patients with abdominal nodal disease had inferior lymphoma‐specific survival (P = .04) and presented with higher age‐adjusted IPI (P < .001), lactate dehydrogenase (P < .001) and more often advanced stage (P < .001), bulky disease (P < .001), B symptoms (P < .001), and double expression of MYC and BCL2 (P = .02) compared to patients without nodal abdominal involvement, but less often extranodal involvement (P < .02). The worst outcome was observed in those where the abdominal nodal involvement was verified by histopathological biopsy.

Conclusion

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas patients with abdominal nodal disease had inferior outcome and more aggressive behaviour, reflected both in clinical and biological characteristics.

Patients With Malignant Lymphoma and HIV Infection Experiencing Remission After First-Line Treatment Have an Excellent Prognosis

BACKGROUND

Malignant lymphoma is still the leading cause of death among AIDS-related diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 HIV-positive lymphoma patients. The median interval between HIV and malignant lymphoma diagnosis was 4 years. Eight patients (16%) had Hodgkin lymphoma and 42 (84%) non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 18, 42%), Burkitt lymphoma (n = 11, 26%), and plasmoblastic lymphoma (n = 5, 12%) were the most frequent entities.

RESULTS

Lymphoma was treated according to standard protocols. Forty-four patients (88%) received combination antiretroviral therapy, 2 (4%) were not treated, and in 4 (8%) the HIV treatment status was not clarified. Response to first-line therapy was complete response (CR) in 24 (56%), partial response (PR) in 15 (35%), and stable disease in 1 (2%). Three patients (7%) developed progressive disease, and 9 (18%) experienced relapse after CR or PR. At a median observation period of 31 (range, 0.4-192) months, the 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival was 87%, 79%, and 76%, respectively. At univariate analysis, remission status after first-line treatment was predictive of outcome, as the 2-year overall survival was 95%, 66%, and 0 for patients with CR, with PR, and with progressive disease (P < .001). Results of the multivariate analysis revealed lactate dehydrogenase concentration at lymphoma diagnosis (P = .046) and relapse (P = .050) to be independent factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

First-line treatment of lymphoma in HIV positive patients is crucial. Patients who experienced and maintained a first CR had a favorable prognosis.