Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant with dual T-cell depletion in myelofibrosis

Pretransplant Blinatumomab Improves Outcomes in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Who Undergo Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Blinatumomab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, effectively controls refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and promotes measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. This study investigated the impact of pretransplant blinatumomab on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes in B cell ALL patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the effect of pretransplant blinatumomab on transplant outcomes of 117 adults undergoing allogeneic HCT for B cell ALL at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, between 2010 and 2021. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS), cumulative incidences of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months. Thirty-one participants (26.5%) received blinatumomab. Blinatumomab group had higher proportions of individuals with high disease risk index, primary induction failure and was more likely to receive dual T cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin and post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Two-year OS, GRFS, NRM, and CIR in the blinatumomab and nonblinatumomab groups were, respectively: 65.4% versus 45.6% (P = .05), 42.2% versus 17.3% (P = .01), 3.2% versus 43.0% (P = .007) and 34.4% versus 14.4% (P = .02). Blinatumomab was associated with a lower incidence of day-100 grade 2 to 4 and grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD): 27.5% versus 56.7% (P = .009), and 10.9% versus 34.7% (P = .04), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between pretransplant blinatumomab and improved OS and NRM.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant blinatumomab is associated with improved OS and lower risk of NRM in B cell ALL patients undergoing allogeneic HCT, likely reflecting lower burden of treatment-related toxicity in this population. Larger prospective trials are warranted to validate our findings.

Improved donor chimerism in relapse myelofibrosis post allogenic stem cell transplant with azacitidine and oral decitabine-First case report

To date, allogenic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only potential curative option for patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). However, relapse rates and associated mortality remain a concern. A second ASCT may not be feasible due to advancing age, declined functional status, donor unavailability, toxicities associated with a second ASCT. Herein, we report the first case of utilizing initially azacitidine and subsequently oral decitabine + cedazuridine (decitabine), in the context of relapsed PMF post-ASCT. Utilizing both hypomethylating agents provided disease control and improved donor/myeloid lineage chimerism levels, and the patient also remained transfusion independent, with preserved functional status and quality of life.

2021 Update on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for myelofibrosis: A review of current data and applications on risk stratification and management

The number of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) undergoing an allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is increasing: in the analysis of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) the number of MF has increased from 515 in 2014 to 748 in 2018 . This reflects the fact that HSCT is currently the only curative treatment, capable of inducing prolonged disease‐free survival. Nevertheless, several problems prevent more patients from undergoing an allogeneic HSCT: we will be discussing indications for HSCT, comorbidities, splenomegaly, older age and disease phase. Donor type and stem cell source are less of a problem. Several transplant platforms exist, including different strategies for graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, Age tailored conditioning regimens need to be implemented, to allow older and fragile patients to undergo an allogeneic HSCT.

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative therapeutic modality for patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF). However, many patients are considered ineligible for allo-HCT, and transplant-related mortality can be substantial. Data on the efficacy and safety of allo-HCT are mixed and largely derived from retrospective studies. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of allo-HCT in MF and to identify patient, disease, and transplant characteristics with prognostic impact on outcomes of patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to October 11, 2020, for studies on allo-HCT in MF. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the co-primary outcomes of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS). Rates of non-relapse mortality and acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were studied as secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses on the effect of conditioning regimen intensity, baseline dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) score, and patient age were performed. The study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020188706). Forty-three studies with 8739 patients were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year OS were 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5%-69.8%), 64.4% (95% CI, 57.6%-70.6%), and 55.0% (95% CI, 51.8%-58.3%), respectively. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year nonrelapse mortality were 25.9% (95% CI, 23.3%-28.7%), 29.7% (95% CI, 24.5%-35.4%), and 30.5% (95% CI, 25.9%-35.5%), respectively. The combined rate of graft failure was 10.6% (95% CI, 8.9%-12.5%) with primary and secondary graft failure occurring in 7.3% (95% CI, 5.7%-9.4%) and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-8.0%) of patients, respectively. Rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 44.0% (95% CI, 39.6%-48.4%; grade III/IV: 15.2%) and 46.5% (95% CI, 42.2%-50.8%; extensive or moderate/severe: 26.1%), respectively. Subgroup analyses did not show any significant difference between conditioning regimen intensity (myeloablative versus reduced-intensity), median patient age, and proportion of DIPSS-intermediate-2/high patients. The quality of the evidence is limited by the absence of randomized clinical trials in the field and the heterogeneity of patient and transplant characteristics across included studies. Given the poor prognosis of patients not receiving transplants and in the absence of curative nontransplantation therapies, our results support consideration of allo-HCT for eligible patients with MF.

Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: 2021

The aim of this review is to update the current status of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We have first summarized the issue of an indication for allogeneic HSCT, discussing several prognostic scoring systems, developed to predict the outcome of MF, and therefore to identify patients who will benefit of an allogeneic HSCT. Patients with low risk MF are usually not selected for a transplant, whereas patients with intermediate or high risk MF are eligible. A separate issue, is how to predict the outcome of HSCT: we will outline a clinical molecular myelofibrosis transplant scoring system (MTSS), which predicts overall survival, ranging from 90% for low risk patients, to 20% for very high risk patients. We will also discuss transfusion burden and spleen size, as predictors of transplant outcome. The choice of a transplant platform including the conditioning regimen, the stem cell source and GvHD prophylaxis, are crucial for a successful program in MF, and will be outlined. Complications such as poor graft function, graft failure, GvHD and relapse of the disease, will also be reviewed. Finally we discuss monitoring the disease after HSCT with donor chimerism, driver mutations and hematologic data. We have made an effort to make this review as comprehensive and up to date as possible, and we hope it will provide some useful data for the clinicians.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a real-life perspective

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal stem cell neoplasm with heterogeneous clinical phenotypes and well-established molecular drivers. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers an important curative treatment option for primary MF and post-essential thrombocythaemia/polycythaemia vera MF or secondary MF. With a disease course that varies from indolent to highly progressive, we are now able to stratify risk of mortality through various tools including patient-related clinical characteristics as well as molecular genetic profile. Owing to the high risk of mortality and morbidity associated with HSCT for patients with myelofibrosis, it is important to improve patient selection for transplant. Our primary goal is to comprehensively define our understanding of current practices including the role of Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, to present the data behind transplantation before and after leukaemic transformation, and to introduce novel personalization of MF treatment with a proposed clinical-molecular prognostic model to help elucidate a timepoint optimal for consideration of HSCT.

Inferior outcomes with reduced intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in fit individuals with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Canadian single-center study and a comparison to registry data

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can offer cure to some patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It remains unclear how conditioning intensity affects transplant outcomes in ALL. In this retrospective study, we compared outcomes between 27 patients <60 who received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) at Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Center (PMCC) and 226 Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) age-matched controls who received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) between 2007 and 2018. Compared to CTTC patients, PMCC patients had an inferior 2-y OS: 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11-0.49) vs 0.63 (0.56-0.70), HR = 2.10 (1.23-3.55), p = 0.006, higher TRM: 0.41 (0.22-0.60) vs 0.24 (0.18-0.30), HR = 2.00 (1.05-3.81), p = 0.04 and a trend toward increased risk of relapse: 0.36 (0.17-0.56) versus 0.17 (0.12-0.22), HR = 1.72 (0.82-3.62), p = 0.15. In multivariate analysis, RIC and the use of T-cell depletion (TCD) were associated with inferior OS. In ALL patients <60, the use of RIC with TCD is associated with inferior allogeneic HCT outcomes.