Treatment Horizon in Multiple Myeloma

A systematic epidemiological trends analysis study in global burden of multiple myeloma and 29 years forecast

Multiple myeloma is a prevalent hematologic cancer. This investigation analyzes the latest global, regional, and national data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2021. Data on the incidence, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and mortality rates of multiple myeloma, including estimates and 95% uncertainty intervals, were sourced from the 2021 Global Burden of Diseases Study. Furthermore, we explored the trends affecting the multiple myeloma burden from 1990 to 2021, breaking it down by demographic, age, and epidemiological factors. By 2021, the global incidence of multiple myeloma involved 148,754.63 reported cases, with confidence intervals ranging from 131,780.43 to 162,049.23. Worldwide, the number of mortality attributed to multiple myeloma reached 116,359.63, with the confidence interval lying between 103,078.62 and 128,470.57, and an age-standardized mortality rate of 1.37 per 100,000 individuals, the confidence interval for which was 1.22 to 1.52. There was a consistent increase in the incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years associated with multiple myeloma. Most of the disease burdens were seen in high income countries though its incidence is on the rise in low-income countries. Forecast for the years 2022-2050 showed the further increase in the incidence, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and age-standardized death rates of multiple myeloma.

Impact of bortezomib on 1q21+ in multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic implications

The gain of chromosomal region 1q21 is a significant risk factor in multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with poor prognosis. The introduction of bortezomib has notably improved outcomes for patients with MM. However, recent studies have reported conflicting results regarding the efficacy of bortezomib in mitigating the adverse effects of 1q21 aberration in these patients. To address this, in the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted based on 6 studies encompassing 1,575 patients with MM. The prognosis of patients with 1q21+ who underwent treatment with a bortezomib-based regimen was evaluated in terms of complete response (CR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The results demonstrated that patients with 1q21 aberration were more likely to achieve CR than those without 1q21+ under bortezomib-based treatment [odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.83; P=0.0008]. However, 1q21+ remained a high-risk factor in patients with MM even after bortezomib treatment [PFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.72; 95% CI, 1.53-1.93; P<0.00001; and OS: HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.58-2.42; P<0.00001]. In conclusion, although bortezomib improved the likelihood of achieving CR in patients with 1q21+, this genetic aberration continues to be considered a high-risk factor in patients with MM treated with a bortezomib-based regimen.

Advancing Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy: A Review of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific T-Cell Engagers Cell Therapies in Revolutionizing Treatment

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by clonal plasma cell development, leading to serious complications. Despite traditional treatments, MM remains incurable, necessitating innovative therapeutic approaches. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) are emerging immunotherapies showing promise in MM treatment. CAR T-cell therapy involves modifying patient T-cells to target specific antigens, primarily B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA). BiTEs, on the other hand, are non-IgG-like bispecific antibodies designed to engage both CD3 and tumor-associated antigens. These therapies exhibit impressive efficacy in clinical trials, leading to FDA approvals for specific MM patient populations. Despite their successes, these therapies come with unique challenges and adverse effects, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. This narrative review explores the mechanisms, efficacy, challenges, and potential benefits of CAR T-cell and BiTE therapies for MM patients, shedding light on their roles in addressing this complex disease.

Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulators Mezigdomide and Iberdomide in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains a challenging hematological malignancy despite significant advancements made during the past 2 decades. Outcomes have improved by incorporating immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies into treatment algorithms that include high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, many patients may eventually relapse despite these innovations. Newer therapies targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) offer promise for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. BCMA-targeted therapies carry notable side effects, necessitating vigilant monitoring and proactive infection prevention measures. They can also induce considerable immunosuppression, attributed to lower levels of immunoglobulins and increased susceptibility to infections. There is still a need for alternative treatment options with different mechanisms of action that can be easily administered and have a better safety profile. In addition, pomalidomide only overcomes lenalidomide refractoriness in a subset of patients. This review aims to explore 2 next-generation cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs), Mezigdomide (CC92480), and Iberdomide (CC-220). We will discuss the biological aspects of these agents, including their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and toxicity profile, and provide a comprehensive review of current literature. Special attention will be paid to ongoing and future clinical trials that provide insights into the potential of these novel therapies in the management of MM.

Advances in adoptive cellular immunotherapy and therapeutic breakthroughs in multiple myeloma

The basic idea of modulating the immune system to better recognize and fight tumor cells has led to the successful introduction of adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACT). ACT-based treatment regimens, in which the patient's own immune cells are isolated and subsequently expanded (ex vivo) and reinfused, have also contributed significantly to the development of a personalized treatment strategy. Complementing this, the unprecedented advances in ACTs as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies and their derivatives such as CAR-NK, CAR-macrophages, CAR-γδT and CAR-NKT have further maximized the therapeutic outcomes. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the development of ACTs in multiple myeloma (MM) and outline how they have evolved from an experimental form to a mainstay of standard clinical settings. Besides, we provide insights into cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) therapy, an alternative form of ACT that (as CIK or CAR-CIK) has enormous potential in the clinical spectrum of MM. We also summarize the results of the major preclinical and clinical studies of adoptive cell therapy in MM and address the current challenges (such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity) that limit its complete success in the cancer landscape.

Mechanisms and salvage treatments in patients with multiple myeloma relapsed post-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has ushered in a new era for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Numerous clinical studies, especially those involving B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR-T, have shown remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). However, a considerable number of patients still experience disease recurrence or progression after BCMA CAR-T treatment, which is attributed to various factors, including antigen escape, CAR-T manufacturing factors, T cell exhaustion, inhibitory effects of tumor microenvironment and impact of prior treatments. The scarcity of effective treatment options following post-CAR-T disease recurrence, coupled with the lack of well-established salvage regimens, leaves patients who do relapse facing a bleak prognosis. In recent years, some academic institutions have achieved certain results in salvage treatments of patients with relapse after BCMA CAR-T treatment through secondary infusion of BCMA CAR-T, changing to non-BCMA-directed CAR-T, double-target CAR-T, bispecific antibodies or other novel therapies. This review summarizes the mechanisms of resistance or relapse after BCMA CAR-T administration and the available data on current salvage treatments, hoping to provide ideas for optimizing clinical salvage therapies.

Description of Feelings, Perception, and Experience Before and After Switching from IV Daratumumab to the SC Form: A Mixed-Method, Cross-Sectional Survey in Multiple Myeloma Patients in Europe

Purpose

To provide real-world data on patient perceptions and experiences with subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) daratumumab.

Patients and Methods

This was a cross-sectional, mixed-method (qualitative/quantitative) survey conducted in France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom involving multiple myeloma (MM) patients who switched from IV to SC daratumumab in the last 12 months (qualitative phase) or 24 months (quantitative phase [26 months in the UK]) prior to enrollment in the study.

Results

Nine patients (mean age 65 years) participated in the qualitative phase and 113 patients (mean age 65.1 years) in the quantitative phase. Qualitative study results provided insights for the quantitative study and highlighted the benefits of switching from daratumumab IV to daratumumab SC as an improvement and a satisfactory change in patients' treatment journey. Quantitative survey showed that patients were significantly less anxious, stressed and nervous before SC injections than IV infusions (mean score: 1.3, 1.1, 1.4 versus 2.1, 2.0, 2.0 respectively, p<0.001), and significantly more reassured, ready/well-prepared, usual self and relieved (mean score: 3.8, 4.3, 3.7, 3.6 versus 3.0, 3.6, 3.1, 3.0 respectively, p<0.001). Immediately after SC first injection, 96.5% patients were feeling well or very well versus 77.9% immediately after IV first infusion (p<0.001). 97.3% patients were satisfied with their SC treatment versus 89.4% for the IV injection (p<0.001). Patients spent significantly less time in hospital for an SC injection of daratumumab than for an IV infusion, 1.5 hours and 5.0 hours respectively (p<0.001). In the UK, the differences between the two administration forms were less visible, likely because of confounding factors including a longer time passed since the switch from the IV to the SC form and administration of the survey.

Conclusion

In line with results from other studies, the SC form of daratumumab had less impact on patients' emotional burden than the IV form.

Multiple mechanisms contribute to acquired TRAIL resistance in multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma (MM) prognosis has recently improved thanks to the incorporation of new therapies to the clinic. Nonetheless, it is still a non-curable malignancy. Targeting cancer cells with agents inducing cell death has been an appealing alternative investigated over the years, as is the case of TRAIL, an agonist of DR4 and DR5 death receptors. This pathway, involved in apoptosis triggering, has demonstrated efficacy on MM cells. In this research, we have investigated the sensitivity of a panel of MM cells to this agent and generated TRAIL-resistant models by continuous culture of sensitive cells with this peptide. Using genomic and biochemical approaches, the mechanisms underlying resistance were investigated. In TRAIL-resistant cells, a strong reduction in cell-surface receptor levels was detected and impaired the apoptotic machinery to respond to the treatment, enabling cells to efficiently form the Death Inducing Signalling Complex. In addition, an upregulation of the inhibitory protein c-FLIP was detected. Even though the manipulation of these proteins was able to modify cellular responses to TRAIL, it was not complete, pointing to other mechanisms involved in TRAIL resistance.

AL amyloidosis manifesting as a vertebral amyloidoma secondary to an unrecognized plasmacytoma expressing cyclin D1 case report

INTRODUCTION

Immunoglobin-related (AL) amyloidosis is the production of amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chains from clonal plasma cells or, rarely, B-cell lymphomas with plasmacytic differentiation. Amyloid deposition causes progressive end organ destruction with profound morbidity.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We present a rare case of a lambda light chain AL amyloidoma localized to a thoracic vertebra of an 87-year-old woman who had a remote history of an unspecified non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (NHL). Our patient presented with upper extremity neuropathy and was found by MRI to have a malignant-appearing lesion throughout the T1 vertebra. Initial biopsy showed amyloid deposition and staging evaluation found localized disease. Prior to planned surgery and radiation the following year, she had worsening neuropathy including multiple falls. Repeat MRI confirmed lesion progression with concern for cord compression. Urgent surgical resection was performed. Histology showed numerous plasma cells with abundant amyloid deposition that was found by amyloid typing to be lambda light chain. An incidental B-cell rich lymphoid aggregate was also seen in a bone marrow fragment that required additional immunohistochemical evaluation, showing the aggregate to be benign while revealing the plasma cells to be positive for cyclin D1. She received localized radiation and has been asymptomatic.

DISCUSSION

Amyloidosis and plasma cell neoplasms require appropriate staging evaluation. The cyclin D1-positive plasma cells raises the possibility of the t(11;14)/IGH::CCND1 translocation that portends better prognosis and therapeutic response with venetoclax.

CONCLUSION

Amyloidomas are uncommon and may present in nearly any site, requiring a high index of clinical suspicion for proper diagnosis.

Bone marrow fibrosis in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and its correlation with clinicopathological factors

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) severely impacts both the quality of life and the efficacy of diagnostic procedures. However, the correlation between BMF and clinicopathological features, cytogenetic changes, and prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains unclear. This study determined the incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with NDMM with BMF.

METHODS

The clinical data, histological features, and clinical outcomes of patients with NDMM were collected. Reticular fiber staining was performed on the enrolled cases, and the degree of reticular fiber overgrowth was graded. Patients with MF-2 and MF-3 were classified as the BMF+ group, and those with MF-0 and MF-1 were classified as the BMF- group, and BMF incidence was calculated. The differences in clinical data, histological features, and clinical outcomes between the BMF+ group and the BMF- group were compared.

RESULTS

A consecutive series of 146 patients with NDMM were included. The incidence of MF-0, MF-1, MF-2, and MF-3 was 7.53% (11/146), 34.93% (51/146), 51.37% (75/146), and 6.16% (9/146), respectively. The incidence of BMF-MF-2 and MF-3-was 57.53% (84/146). A significant correlation was identified between the pattern of infiltration and BMF (P < 0.001). In the BMF- group, the distribution of cases with interstitial, nodular, and diffuse infiltration of plasma cells was 16 (25.8%), 21 (33.9%), and 25 (40.3%), respectively. Conversely, in the BMF+ group, these values for interstitial, nodular, and diffuse tumor cells were 9 (10.7%), 15 (17.9%), and 60 (71.4%). Furthermore, BMF was associated with a diffuse infiltration pattern. The overall survival (OS) of the BMF+ group (39.1 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.0-44.3) was lower than that of the BMF- group (45.4 months; 95% CI: 39.5-51.3), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.221). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the BMF+ status was not associated with OS in patients with NDMM (P = 0.381 and P = 0.748, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that BMF is linked to a diffuse infiltration pattern, and its occurrence is not related to the prognosis of patients with NDMM, providing a basis for further exploring the BMF value in NDMM diagnosis and treatment.

Autoimmune Diseases and Plasma Cells Dyscrasias: Pathogenetic, Molecular and Prognostic Correlations

Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are plasma cell dyscrasias characterized by monoclonal proliferation of pathological plasma cells with uncontrolled production of immunoglobulins. Autoimmune pathologies are conditions in which T and B lymphocytes develop a tendency to activate towards self-antigens in the absence of exogenous triggers. The aim of our review is to show the possible correlations between the two pathological aspects. Molecular studies have shown how different cytokines that either cause inflammation or control the immune system play a part in the growth of immunotolerance conditions that make it easier for the development of neoplastic malignancies. Uncontrolled immune activation resulting in chronic inflammation is also known to be at the basis of the evolution toward neoplastic pathologies, as well as multiple myeloma. Another point is the impact that myeloma-specific therapies have on the course of concomitant autoimmune diseases. Indeed, cases have been observed of patients suffering from multiple myeloma treated with daratumumab and bortezomib who also benefited from their autoimmune condition or patients under treatment with immunomodulators in which there has been an arising or worsening of autoimmunity conditions. The role of bone marrow transplantation in the course of concomitant autoimmune diseases remains under analysis.

Exploring the role of histone deacetylase and histone deacetylase inhibitors in the context of multiple myeloma: mechanisms, therapeutic implications, and future perspectives

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are a significant category of pharmaceuticals that have developed in the past two decades to treat multiple myeloma. Four drugs in this category have received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use: Panobinonstat (though canceled by the FDA in 2022), Vorinostat, Belinostat and Romidepsin. The efficacy of this group of drugs is attributed to the disruption of many processes involved in tumor growth through the inhibition of histone deacetylase, and this mode of action leads to significant anti-multiple myeloma (MM) activity. In MM, inhibition of histone deacetylase has many downstream consequences, including suppression of NF-κB signaling and HSP90, upregulation of cell cycle regulators (p21, p53), and downregulation of antiapoptotic proteins including Bcl-2. Furthermore, HDACis have a variety of direct and indirect oxidative effects on cellular DNA. HDAC inhibitors enhance normal immune function, thereby decreasing the proliferation of malignant plasma cells and promoting autophagy. The various biological effects of inhibiting histone deacetylase have a combined or additional impact when used alongside other chemotherapeutic and targeted drugs for multiple myeloma. This helps to decrease resistance to treatment. Combination treatment regimens that include HDACis have become an essential part of the therapy for multiple myeloma. These regimens incorporate drugs from other important classes of anti-myeloma agents, such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), conventional chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, and proteasome inhibitors. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety data pertaining to the currently approved histone deacetylase inhibitors, as well as an explanation of the crucial function of histone deacetylase in multiple myeloma and the characteristics of the different histone deacetylase inhibitors. Moreover, it provides a concise overview of the most recent developments in the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors for treating multiple myeloma, as well as potential future uses in treatment.

A digital twin model for evidence-based clinical decision support in multiple myeloma treatment

The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has experienced substantial progress over the last decade. Despite the efficacy of new substances, patient responses tend to still be highly unpredictable. With increasing cognitive burden that is introduced through a complex and evolving treatment landscape, data-driven assistance tools are becoming more and more popular. Model-based approaches, such as digital twins (DT), enable simulation of probable responses to a set of input parameters based on retrospective observations. In the context of treatment decision-support, those mechanisms serve the goal to predict therapeutic outcomes to distinguish a favorable option from a potential failure. In the present work, we propose a similarity-based multiple myeloma digital twin (MMDT) that emphasizes explainability and interpretability in treatment outcome evaluation. We've conducted a requirement specification process using scientific literature from the medical and methodological domains to derive an architectural blueprint for the design and implementation of the MMDT. In a subsequent stage, we've implemented a four-layer concept where for each layer, we describe the utilized implementation procedure and interfaces to the surrounding DT environment. We further specify our solutions regarding the adoption of multi-line treatment strategies, the integration of external evidence and knowledge, as well as mechanisms to enable transparency in the data processing logic. Furthermore, we define an initial evaluation scenario in the context of patient characterization and treatment outcome simulation as an exemplary use case for our MMDT. Our derived MMDT instance is defined by 475 unique entities connected through 438 edges to form a MM knowledge graph. Using the MMRF CoMMpass real-world evidence database and a sample MM case, we processed a complete outcome assessment. The output shows a valid selection of potential treatment strategies for the integrated medical case and highlights the potential of the MMDT to be used for such applications. DT models face significant challenges in development, including availability of clinical data to algorithmically derive clinical decision support, as well as trustworthiness of the evaluated treatment options. We propose a collaborative approach that mitigates the regulatory and ethical concerns that are broadly discussed when automated decision-making tools are to be included into clinical routine.

Determining Optimal Combination Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma

While many novel therapies have been approved in recent years for treating patients with multiple myeloma, there is still no established curative regimen, especially for patients with high-risk disease. In this work, we use a mathematical modeling approach to determine combination therapy regimens that maximize healthy lifespan for patients with multiple myeloma. We start with a mathematical model for the underlying disease and immune dynamics, which was presented and analyzed previously. We add the effects of three therapies to the model: pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and elotuzumab. We consider multiple approaches to optimizing combinations of these therapies. We find that optimal control combined with approximation outperforms other methods, in that it can quickly produce a combination regimen that is clinically-feasible and near-optimal. Implications of this work can be used to optimize doses and advance the scheduling of drugs.

Bortezomib Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Review and Future Perspectives

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological neoplasm for which different chemotherapy treatments are used with several drugs in combination. One of the most frequently used drugs for the treatment of MM is the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Patients treated with bortezomib are at increased risk for thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, gastrointestinal toxicities, peripheral neuropathy, infection, and fatigue. This drug is almost entirely metabolized by cytochrome CYP450 isoenzymes and transported by the efflux pump P-glycoprotein. Genes encoding both enzymes and transporters involved in the bortezomib pharmacokinetic pathway are highly polymorphic. The response to bortezomib and the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) vary among patients, which could be due to interindividual variations in these possible pharmacogenetic biomarkers. In this review, we compiled all pharmacogenetic information relevant to the treatment of MM with bortezomib. In addition, we discuss possible future perspectives and the analysis of potential pharmacogenetic markers that could influence the incidence of ADR and the toxicity of bortezomib. It would be a milestone in the field of targeted therapy for MM to relate potential biomarkers to the various effects of bortezomib on patients.

Real-world Outcomes With Cumulative Bortezomib Dose and Efficacy in the Treatment of Transplant-ineligible Multiple Myeloma With Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone

BACKGROUND

Higher cumulative dose of bortezomib, a key component of Multiple Myeloma (MM) treatment regimens, has been shown to improve outcomes in MM patients, but must be balanced with toxicities including peripheral neuropathy. In this study, we studied the effect of cumulative bortezomib dose on survival, depth of response, and discontinuation rate in transplant ineligible MM patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 70 patients treated with Cyclophsophamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) in a single Canadian center were grouped according to above vs below median cumulative bortezomib dose and analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), depth of response, and discontinuation rate.

RESULTS

There was a trend for lower discontinuation rate (45.7% vs. 68.6%, P = .052) and significantly lower rate of neuropathy-related discontinuation (5.7% vs. 22.9%, P = .035) in patients who received higher than 43.1 mg/m² of bortezomib. The higher-dose group showed a trend for higher rate of complete response (14.3% vs. 5.7%, P = .225) and significantly higher rate of very good partial response or better (77.1% vs. 51.4%, P = .024). There was significantly longer PFS (24.3 vs. 9.1 months, P = .012) and a trend for longer OS (22.4 vs. 61.3 months, P = .061) in the higher-dose group. In landmark analysis after 180 days, PFS (23.5 vs. 24.3 months, P = .941) and OS were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Higher cumulative bortezomib dose showed a lower rate of discontinuation, longer survival, and deeper response. Determining risk of treatment intolerance remains important for treatment.