A strategy to expeditious invasive treatment improves clinical outcome in comatose patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Outcomes following poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Up to 35% of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) cases may present as poor grade, defined as World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grades IV and V. In this study, we evaluate functional outcomes and prognostic factors.

METHODS

This prospective study included all patients referred to a national, centralized neurosurgical service with a diagnosis of poor-grade aSAH between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2019. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate probability of poor functional outcomes, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) of 1-3 at 3 months.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven patients were referred, of whom 116/257 (45.1%) underwent treatment of an aneurysm, with 97/116 (84%) treated within 48 h of referral. Median age was 62 years (IQR 51-69) with a female predominance (167/257, 65%). Untreated patients tended to be older; 123/141 (87%) had WFNS V, 60/141 (45%) unreactive pupils and 21/141 (16%) circulatory arrest. Of all referred patients, poor outcome occurred in 169/230 (73.5%). Unreactive pupils or circulatory arrest conferred a universally poor prognosis, with mortality in 55/56 (98%) and 19/19 (100%), respectively. The risk of a poor outcome was 14.1% (95% CI 4.5-23.6) higher in WFNS V compared with WFNS IV. Age was important in patients without circulatory arrest or unreactive pupils, with risk of a poor outcome increasing by 1.8% per year (95% CI 1-2.7). In patients undergoing aneurysm securement, 48/101 (47.5%) had a poor outcome, with age, rebleeding, vasospasm and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion being important prognosticators. The addition of serum markers did not add significant discrimination beyond the clinical presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall outcomes of WFNS IV and V aSAH remain poor, mainly due to the devastating effects of the original haemorrhage. However, in patients selected for aneurysm securement, good outcomes can be achieved in more than half of patients. Age, pre-intervention rebleeding, vasospasm, and CSF diversion are important prognostic factors.

External Validation of the HATCH (Hemorrhage, Age, Treatment, Clinical State, Hydrocephalus) Score for Prediction of Functional Outcome After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The Hemorrhage, Age, Treatment, Clinical State, Hydrocephalus (HATCH) Score has previously shown to predict functional outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

OBJECTIVE

To validate the HATCH score.

METHODS

This is a pooled cohort study including prospective collected data on 761 patients with aSAH from 4 different hospitals. The HATCH score for prediction of functional outcome was validated using calibration and discrimination analysis (area under the curve). HATCH score model performance was compared with the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and Barrow Neurological Institute score.

RESULTS

At the follow-up of at least 6 months, favorable (Glasgow Outcome Score 4-5) and unfavorable functional outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Score 1-3) were observed in 512 (73%) and 189 (27%) patients, respectively. A higher HATCH score was associated with an increased risk of unfavorable outcome with a score of 1 showing a risk of 1.3% and a score of 12 yielding a risk of 67%. External validation showed a calibration intercept of -0.07 and slope of 0.60 with a Brier score of 0.157 indicating good model calibration and accuracy. With an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.84), the HATCH score demonstrated superior discriminative ability to detect favorable outcome at follow-up compared with the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and Barrow Neurological Institute score with 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.75) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.68), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter external validation analysis confirms the HATCH score to be a strong independent predictor for functional outcome. Its incorporation into daily practice may be of benefit for goal-directed patient care in aSAH.

Predictive Factors of Functional Outcome in World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Grade V Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Patients with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade V subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) frequently have poor outcomes. The current understanding of the predictors of functional outcome only in WFNS grade V SAH is limited.

METHODS

Patients with WFNS grade V SAH were retrospectively analyzed between April 2008 and August 2019. Surgical treatment is commonly delayed until clinical improvement is observed using a less aggressive approach. Clinical and radiologic data on admission were assessed, and disease-related characteristics were compared between patients with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3) and those with unfavorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 4-6).

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included, and 22 patients (15.3%) achieved favorable outcomes, whereas 122 patients (84.7%) had unfavorable outcomes. Surgical aneurysm repair was performed in all patients with favorable outcomes and in 21.3% of those with unfavorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed that Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3, high-grade Early Brain Edema Score, absence of bilaterally light reflex and neurologic improvement, and hypertension were significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 9.54, P = 0.03; OR, 5.37, P = 0.04; OR, 11.80, P = 0.009; OR, 0.14, P = 0.02 and OR, 6.53, P = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The final outcome of patients with WFNS grade V SAH was still poor and highly predicted by Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3, high-grade Early Brain Edema Score, absence of bilaterally light reflex and neurologic improvement, and a history of hypertension. The efficacy of aggressive surgical treatment for these patients remains controversial, and the indications should be clearly defined in patients with desolate clinical status on admission.

NeuroEthics and End of Life Care

The emergency department is where the patient and potential ethical challenges are first encountered. Patients with acute neurologic illness introduce a unique set of dilemmas related to the pressure for ultra-early prognosis in the wake of rapidly advancing treatments. Many with neurologic injury are unable to provide autonomous consent, further complicating the picture, potentially asking uncertain surrogates to make quick decisions that may result in significant disability. The emergency department physician must take these ethical quandaries into account to provide standard of care treatment.

Cortical Blood Flow Insufficiency Scores with Computed Tomography Perfusion can Predict Outcomes in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) scale is widely accepted for predicting outcomes for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. However, it is difficult to definitely predict outcomes for the most poor grade, WFNS grade 5. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic ability of a novel classification using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) findings, called the cortical blood flow insufficiency (CBFI) scores.

METHODS

CTP was performed on admission for aneurysmal SAH followed by radical treatments within 72 hours of onset. Twenty-four cerebral cortex regions of interest (ROIs) were defined. CBFI was defined as Tmax > 4 s in each ROI, and CBFI scores were calculated based on the total number of ROIs with CBFI. Using the optimal cutoff value based on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to predict patient functional outcomes, CBFI scores were divided into "high" or "low" CBFI scores. Patient functional outcomes at 90 days were categorized based on modified Rankin Scale scores (0-3, favorable group; 4-6 unfavorable group) (0-4, non-catastrophic group; 5-6, catastrophic group).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in this study, of whom 21 (36.8%) and 13 (22.8%) were in the unfavorable and the catastrophic groups, respectively. A factor predicting unfavorable and catastrophic outcomes was CBFI score cutoff value of 7 points (area under the curve, 0.73 and 0.81, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression analysis for unfavorable outcome, high CBFI scores (odds ratio (OR), 8.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-65.4; P = 0.04) and WFNS grade 5 (OR, 30.0; 95% CI, 4.5-201.0; P < 0.001) remained as independent predictors, while for catastrophic outcome, high CBFI scores (OR, 25.3; 95% CI, 3.3-194.0; P = 0.002) and age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2; P = 0.02) remained as independent predictors. Conversely, WFNS grade 5 was not an independent predictor of catastrophic outcomes (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 0.6-24.0; P = 0.15). In high CBFI scores, the OR of the delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) occurrence was 9.6 (95% CI, 1.5-61.4; P = 0.02) after adjusting for age.

CONCLUSION

High CBFI scores could predict unfavorable and catastrophic outcomes for aneurysmal SAH patients and DCI occurrence.

Outcomes following grade V subarachnoid haemorrhage: A single-centre retrospective study

SummaryGrade V subarachnoid haemorrhage is associated with high mortality and morbidity, yet there are few contemporary reports on the treatment provided and outcomes of these patients. In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, we primarily sought to determine the 12-month mortality of patients admitted to the Royal Adelaide Hospital intensive care unit between 2006 and 2016 with grade V subarachnoid haemorrhage. Secondary objectives were to describe treatments provided, patient destination following hospital discharge, organ donation and hospital financial costs. Over the 11-year study period, there were 139 patients admitted with grade V subarachnoid haemorrhage. The annual number of admissions did not change over time. The median age was 56 (interquartile range 48-70) years, 88 (63%) were female and 77 (55%) had a procedure to isolate an aneurysm. There were 77 (55%) patients who died in the intensive care unit, 87 (63%) died in hospital and 89 (64%) had died at 12 months. Of the 52 patients who survived to hospital discharge, 33 (63%) were transferred to a rehabilitation facility, 17 (33%) to another acute care hospital and two (4%) were discharged. Of the 87 patients who died in hospital, 45 (52%) donated organs. The total hospital cost of managing this cohort was A$8.3 million, with a median cost of A$41,824 (interquartile range A$9,933-A$97,332) per patient. Grade V subarachnoid haemorrhage has a high mortality rate, with one-third of patients alive after one year.

Why Do Patients with Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Die?

BACKGROUND

Poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been associated with a high case fatality, either in the acute phase or in the later stages. The exact causes of death in these patients are unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of all consecutive patients with SAH with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade IV or V on admission from 2009 to 2013 at 2 tertiary referral centers in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada, who had died during their hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 357 patients, 152 (43%) had died. Of these 152 patients, 87 (24%) had not undergone aneurysm treatment. The median interval to death was 3 days (interquartile range, 1-12 days) after initial hemorrhage. The major cause of death in both centers was withdrawal of life support (107 patients [71%]; 74 of 94 [79%] in Amsterdam and 33 of 58 [58%] in Toronto; P < 0.01), followed by brain death in 23 (15%; 16 of 58 [28%] in Amsterdam vs. 7 of 94 [7%] in Toronto; P < 0.01). The remaining causes of death represented <15%.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to withdraw life support was the major reason for death of patients with poor-grade SAH for an overwhelming majority of the patients. The exact reasons for withdrawal of life support, other than cultural and referral differences, were undetermined. Insight into the reasons of death should be prospectively studied to improve the care and clinical outcomes of patients with poor-grade SAH.

Early Treatment Decisions in Poor-Grade Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Patients with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade V subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) mostly have a poor outcome. Correct identification of patients who might benefit from treatment remains challenging. We investigated which disease-related characteristics, present at admission, could identify patients with chance of good outcome.

METHODS

In total, 146 consecutive patients with WFNS grade V SAH (2002-2013) were included. Demographic and disease-related characteristics were compared between patients with a good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4 and 5) and a poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1-3). Subgroups were made of patients with aneurysm treatment according to outcome; 1) good outcome; 2) poor outcome, with optimal general treatment; and 3) poor outcome, general treatment discontinued.

RESULTS

In total, 34 of the 146 patients had a good outcome (36% of all treated patients); 16 (47%) of these presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3, versus 65 (58%) of patients with a poor outcome (P = 0.33). Eleven (33%) patients in the good outcome group presented with pupillary abnormalities; 4 (12%) even had bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils, versus 49 (46%) in patients with a poor outcome (P < 0.01). In 51 patients, the aneurysm was not treated; all died.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one third of all treated patients with WFNS grade V SAH had a good outcome. All patients in whom the aneurysm was not treated died. Reliable identification of patients who will reach good outcome, on the basis of symptoms on admission, seems impossible, as these symptoms are not discriminating enough.

Intersection of prognosis and palliation in neurocritical care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Difficult discussions regarding end-of-life care are common in neurocritical care. Because of a patient's neurological impairment, decisions regarding continuing or limiting aggressive care must often be made by patients' families in conjunction with medical providers. This review provides perspective on three major aspects of this circumstance: prognostication, family-physician discussions, and determination of death (specifically as it impacts on organ donation).

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous studies have now demonstrated that prediction models developed from populations of brain-injured patients may be misleading when applied to individual patients. Early care limitations may lead to the self-fulfilling prophecy of poor outcomes because of care decisions rather than disease course. A shared decision-making approach that emphasizes transmission of information and trust between families and medical providers is ethically appropriate in severely brain-injured patients and as part of the transition to end-of-life palliative care. Standard definitions of death by neurological criteria exist, although worldwide variation and the relationship to organ donation make this complex.

SUMMARY

End-of-life care in patients with severe brain injuries is common and represents a complex intersection of prognostication, family communication, and decision-making. Skills to optimize this should be emphasized in neurocritical care providers.