1
|
Vernieri F, Iannone LF, Guerzoni S, Russo A, Barbanti P, Sances G, Cevoli S, Rao R, Lovati C, Ambrosini A, Buzzoni C, Battisti F, Vatteone L, King SML, Torelli F. Long-Term Effectiveness of Galcanezumab in the Prevention of Migraine: An Italian Retrospective Analysis (REALITY). Neurol Ther 2024; 13:415-435. [PMID: 38329615 PMCID: PMC10951161 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00582-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Galcanezumab is approved in the European Union (EU) as migraine prophylaxis in adults with at least four migraine days per month. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of galcanezumab on migraine-related burdens and its impact on the use of healthcare resources for migraine prophylaxis in an Italian setting. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted in patients with migraine who initiated treatment with galcanezumab for migraine prevention between September 2019 and December 2020. Patient data for monthly migraine days (MMDs) and MMDs with acute medication intake were obtained by medical chart reviews. Information on patient-reported outcomes (using the Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] questionnaire and Headache Impact Test 6 [HIT-6] questionnaire) and on the use of healthcare resources were also collected. The time points of interest were 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after the initiation of galcanezumab, and the most recent time point available during follow-up. RESULTS A total of 207 patients were enrolled in the study. Starting from month 3 after treatment initiation, more than half of the patients presented at least a 50% reduction in MMDs, and approximately one-third of non-responders at month 3 became responders at month 6. From month 3 to month 12, MMDs decreased on average by 10 days. Headache impact and disability, as well as migraine-associated health resource utilization decreased significantly during the treatment period. A positive significant association among the three dimensions of clinical burden (MMDs, MIDAS and days of acute medication intake) was also observed. CONCLUSION The results of this Italian real-world study confirmed that galcanezumab has a rapid onset of effect and provides a long-term response among patients over different migraine-related burdens. The use of healthcare resources was also remarkably reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico-Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, AOU Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
- University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renata Rao
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Carlo Lovati
- L. Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suliman R, Santos V, Al Qaisi I, Aldaher B, Al Fardan A, Al Barrawy H, Bader Y, Supena JL, Alejandro K, Alsaadi T. Effectiveness of Switching CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Non-Responder Patients in the UAE: A Retrospective Study. Neurol Int 2024; 16:274-288. [PMID: 38392960 PMCID: PMC10893254 DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) have shown promising effectiveness in migraine management compared to other preventative treatment options. Many questions remain regarding switching between antibody classes as a treatment option in patients with migraine headaches. This preliminary retrospective real-world study explored the treatment response of patients who switched between CGRP mAb classes due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. A total of 53 patients with migraine headache switched between three of the CGRP mAbs types due to lack of efficacy of the original prescribed CGRP mAbs, specifically eptinezumab, erenumab, and galcanezumab. Fremanezumab was not included due to unavailability in the UAE. Galcanezumab and eptinezumab target the CGRP ligand (CGRP/L), while erenumab targets CGRP receptors (CGRP/R). The analysis of efficacy demonstrated that some improvements were seen in both class switch cohorts (CGRP/R to CGRP/L and CGRP/L to CGRP/R). The safety of switching between CGRP classes was well observed, as any adverse events presented before the class switch did not lead to the discontinuation of treatment following the later switch. The findings of this study suggest that switching between different classes of CGRP mAbs is a potentially safe and clinically viable practice that may have some applications for those experiencing side effects on their current CGRP mAb or those witnessing suboptimal response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Suliman
- American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates (B.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Taoufik Alsaadi
- American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates (B.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hong JB, Lange KS, Fitzek M, Overeem LH, Triller P, Siebert A, Reuter U, Raffaelli B. Impact of a reimbursement policy change on treatment with erenumab in migraine - a real-world experience from Germany. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:144. [PMID: 37899428 PMCID: PMC10614330 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01682-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) pathway are safe and effective treatments for migraine prevention. However, the high cost of these novel therapies has led to reimbursement policies requiring patients to try multiple traditional preventives before access. In Germany, a recent change in insurance policy significantly expanded coverage for the CGRP receptor mAb erenumab, enabling migraine patients who failed just one prior prophylactic medication to receive this mAb. Here, we compare the clinical response to treatment with erenumab in migraine patients treated using the old and new coverage policy. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included CGRP-mAb naïve patients with episodic or chronic migraine, who started erenumab at our headache center according to either the old or the new insurance policy and received at least 3 consecutive injections. Headache diaries and electronic documentation were used to evaluate reductions in monthly headache and migraine days (MHD and MMD) and ≥ 50% and ≥ 30% responder rates at month 3 (weeks 9-12) of treatment. RESULTS We included 146 patients who received erenumab according to the old policy and 63 patients that were treated using the new policy. At weeks 9-12 of treatment, 37.7% of the old policy group had a 50% or greater reduction in MHD, compared to 63.5% of the new policy group (P < 0.001). Mean reduction in MHD was 5.02 days (SD = 5.46) and 6.67 days (SD = 5.32, P = 0.045) in the old and new policy cohort, respectively. After propensity score matching, the marginal effect of the new policy on treatment outcome was 2.29 days (standard error, SE: 0.715, P = 0.001) more reduction in MHD, and 30.1% (SE: 10.6%, P = 0.005) increase in ≥ 50% response rate for MHD. CONCLUSIONS Starting erenumab earlier in the course of migraine progression in a real-world setting may lead to a better response than starting after multiple failed prophylactic attempts. Continually gathering real-world evidence may help policymakers in deciding how readily to cover CGRP-targeted therapies in migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ja Bin Hong
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Mira Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Paul Triller
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Siebert
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ali MD, Gayasuddin Qur F, Alam MS, M Alotaibi N, Mujtaba MA. Global Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Current Therapeutic Novelties in Migraine Therapy and their Prevention: A Narrative Review. Curr Pharm Des 2023; 29:3295-3311. [PMID: 38270151 DOI: 10.2174/0113816128266227231205114320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The current article reviews the latest information on epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, recent advancements in clinical management, current therapeutic novelties, and the prevention of migraines. In a narrative review, all studies as per developed MeSH terms published until February 2023, excluding those irrelevant, were identified through a PubMed literature search. METHODS Overall, migraine affects more than a billion people annually and is one of the most common neurological illnesses. A wide range of comorbidities is associated with migraines, including stress and sleep disturbances. To lower the worldwide burden of migraine, comprehensive efforts are required to develop and enhance migraine treatment, which is supported by informed healthcare policy. Numerous migraine therapies have been successful, but not all patients benefit from them. RESULTS CGRP pathway-targeted therapy demonstrates the importance of translating mechanistic understanding into effective treatment. In this review, we discuss clinical features, diagnosis, and recently approved drugs, as well as a number of potential therapeutic targets, including pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), adenosine, opioid receptors, potassium channels, transient receptor potential ion channels (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC). CONCLUSION In addition to providing more treatment options for improved clinical care, a better understanding of these mechanisms facilitates the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Daud Ali
- Department of Pharmacy, Mohammed Al-Mana College for Medical Sciences, Abdulrazaq Bin Hammam Street, Al Safa, Dammam 34222, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fehmida Gayasuddin Qur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Royal Maternity Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Md Sarfaraz Alam
- Department of Pharmaceutics, HIMT College of Pharmacy, Rajpura 8, Institutional Area, Knowledge Park I, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India
| | - Nawaf M Alotaibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha Campus, Arar, Saudi Arabia
| | - Md Ali Mujtaba
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha Campus, Arar, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Regnier SA, Lee XY. Meta-regression to explain the placebo effects in clinical trials of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention. J Med Econ 2023; 26:1072-1080. [PMID: 37594778 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2248842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Background: Commonly used methods of comparison (e.g. network meta-analyses) require common comparator(s) across trials, such as placebo in placebo-controlled trials. Recent literature indicates that route of administration differences across placebo arms of clinical trials in pain disorders may contribute to differences in placebo effect.Methods: We conducted a meta-regression on placebo data from pivotal clinical trials of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention to quantify the impact of route of administration, migraine type (episodic/chronic), and number of prior treatment failures on placebo reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) across weeks 1-12 of treatment. A systematic literature review of Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature conducted in June 2021 identified 14 relevant, randomized placebo-controlled trials for analysis.Results: After testing models with different covariates, a meta-regression was fitted to the extracted placebo data with the covariates of route of administration, migraine type, and proportion of patients with ≥2 prior preventive treatment failures. An intravenous route of administration for the placebo arm was a predictor for higher MMD reduction. Predictors of lower MMD reduction were migraine type (episodic migraine) and a higher proportion of patients having ≥2 failed preventive treatments.Conclusions: The efficacy of intravenous anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are likely underestimated, and differences in the route of administration of placebo may necessitate use of alternative methods that do not assume the presence of a common comparator when comparing anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine prevention. Further research into the contextual effects of the placebo effect is warranted.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fitzek M, Raffaelli B, Reuter U. Advances in pharmacotherapy for the prophylactic treatment of resistant and refractory migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1143-1153. [PMID: 35698795 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2088281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Refractory migraine is associated with low quality of life and great socioeconomic burden. Despite high need for effective, tolerable preventive therapies, there has been little research on potential therapeutic options. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) are the first preventive therapeutic approach for migraine based on the underlying pathophysiology. AREAS COVERED Following a brief introduction into the term 'refractory migraine,' the authors reviewavailable treatment options, focusing on current phase III trials of substances acting on the CGRP pathway. EXPERT OPINION No uniform definition for refractory migraine is available. The vast majority of proposals recommend treatment failure of 2-4 drug classes as a key diagnostic criterion. Phase III studies on CGRP-(receptor) mAbs demonstrated excellent efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic and episodic migraine including subjects with multiple unsuccessful conventional therapy attempts. However, more comparator trials showing superiority of mAbs versus oral preventatives, such as the HER-MEs study are needed. In summary, with the CGRP antibodies, a group of drugs has entered the market which will most likely not only significantly improve the quality of life of many individual migraine patients but could also reduce indirect health-care costs associated with migraine by reducing recurrent medical consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Clinician Scientist Programm, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kwon S, Gil YE, Lee MJ. Real-world efficacy of galcanezumab for the treatment of migraine in Korean patients. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:705-714. [PMID: 35301884 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221076481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We aimed to provide real-world data on the effectiveness of an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody administered for treating migraine in Korean patients. METHODS We prospectively recruited patients with migraine who received galcanezumab treatment at a single university hospital from June 2020 to April 2021. The treatment response was assessed after three consecutive monthly injections. A 50% responder rate was evaluated based on ≥50% reduction in the number of moderate/severe headache days. RESULTS Overall, 87 patients were included in the analysis. Most patients were women (83.9%). They had a mean age of 41.7 ± 12.3 years (range 17-72). Sixty-five patients (74.7%) had chronic migraine, 35 patients (40.2%) had a history of medication-overuse headache, and 32 patients (36.8%) were previously unresponsive to or found intolerable five classes of preventive medication. After three months of treatment, mean changes in numbers of monthly headache days, moderate/severe headache days, crystal clear days, and days of acute medication use were -7.2 ± 8.43, -4.3 ± 9.76, 7.3 ± 8.50, and -4.1 ± 7.93, respectively. The 50% responder rates were 58.3%, 44.2%, and 40.6% for patients with unsuccessful previous use of 0-1, 2-4, and 5 preventive medication classes, respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 and Migraine Disability Assessment Test scores also decreased (-4.4 ± 8.09 and -32.9 ± 77.04, respectively). CONCLUSION In our cohort, the effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab were comparable with those reported in clinical trials, whereas a higher response rate was observed in the difficult-to-treat patient subset than that reported in trials. We provide real-world evidence of galcanezumab treatment benefits in Asian patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soonwook Kwon
- Department of Neurology, 65745Inha University Hospital, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Young-Eun Gil
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tepper SJ, Ailani J, Ford JH, Nichols RM, Li LQ, Kemmer P, Hand AL, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A. Effects of Galcanezumab on Health-Related Quality of Life and Disability in Patients with Previous Failure of 2-4 Migraine Preventive Medication Categories: Results from a Phase IIIb Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial (CONQUER). Clin Drug Investig 2022; 42:263-275. [PMID: 35041159 PMCID: PMC8930939 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-021-01115-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures have a significant burden on quality of life and disability. The CONQUER study evaluated the effects of galcanezumab on patient functioning, disability, and health status in episodic or chronic migraine with a previous failure of two to four migraine preventive medication categories. METHODS Patients with two to four preventive migraine treatment category failures received galcanezumab 120 mg/month (240-mg loading dose) or placebo subcutaneously, for 3 months (double-blind period). In the 3-month open-label period, all patients received galcanezumab irrespective of the treatment received in the double-blind period. Changes in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) scores were assessed. RESULTS A total of 462 patients were randomized to receive galcanezumab (N = 232) or placebo (N = 230). At month 3, improvement in the MSQ Role-Function-Restrictive score from baseline was significantly greater for galcanezumab (23.19 ± 1.34) vs placebo (10.66 ± 1.33) [p ≤ 0.0001]. Significant improvements in remaining MSQ domains and total MSQ scores were observed (p < 0.0001) during the double-blind period. MIDAS total scores were significantly (p ≤ 0.0001) reduced with galcanezumab (- 21.10 + 3.32) vs placebo (- 3.30 + 3.28). EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale scores improved for galcanezumab (3.40 + 1.31) vs placebo (- 0.09 + 1.29; p = 0.028). During the open-label period, quality of life continued to improve for galcanezumab, with patients previously assigned to placebo reaching similar results. During both study periods, similar findings were reported in subpopulations with episodic migraine and chronic migraine. CONCLUSIONS Galcanezumab significantly improved functioning and reduced disability in patients with episodic migraine and chronic migraine and two to four migraine preventive treatment category failures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03559257, registration date: 6 June, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart J Tepper
- Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Jessica Ailani
- Department of Neurology, Medstar Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Janet H Ford
- Health Outcomes and Real-World Evidence, Biomedicines, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
| | - Russell M Nichols
- Clinical, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | - Lily Q Li
- Clinical, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | - Phebe Kemmer
- Department of Statistics-Neuroscience/Urology, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | - Austin L Hand
- Departments of Statistics, IQVIA, 4820 Emperor Blvd, Durham, NC, 27703, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reuter U, Lucas C, Dolezil D, Hand AL, Port MD, Nichols RM, Stroud C, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Detke HC. Galcanezumab in Patients with Multiple Previous Migraine Preventive Medication Category Failures: Results from the Open-Label Period of the CONQUER Trial. Adv Ther 2021; 38:5465-5483. [PMID: 34542830 PMCID: PMC8523004 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01911-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Results from the open-label extension of the phase 3b CONQUER trial are presented to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide, for up to 6 months in patients with multiple prior migraine preventive treatment failures. METHODS Patients were 18-75 years old with episodic or chronic migraine and 2-4 standard-of-care migraine preventive medication category failures. After 3 months of randomized treatment with galcanezumab (120 mg/month with 240 mg loading dose; n = 232) or placebo (n = 230), patients entered a 3-month open-label extension (120 mg/month galcanezumab with a blinded 240 mg loading dose for previous-placebo patients). Primary efficacy measure was mean change from double-blind baseline in monthly migraine headache days. RESULTS A total of 432/449 patients (96%) who entered open-label treatment completed the study. Mean change in monthly migraine headache days in the total population, which was - 1.3 for placebo and - 4.4 for galcanezumab patients at the end of double-blind treatment (p < 0.001), was - 5.2 and - 5.6, respectively, at the end of open-label treatment with galcanezumab. Among patients with episodic migraine, mean change in monthly migraine headache days had been - 0.6 for placebo and - 2.8 for galcanezumab after double-blind treatment (p < 0.001) and was - 4.5 and - 3.8, respectively, after open-label treatment. Among patients with chronic migraine, mean change in monthly migraine headache days had been - 2.5 for placebo and - 6.6 for galcanezumab after double-blind treatment (p < 0.001) and was - 6.5 and - 8.2, respectively, after open-label treatment. Adverse events were similar to those observed during double-blind placebo treatment. Review of data in elderly patients (65-75 years of age) indicated that galcanezumab was well tolerated in this age group, with no safety issues identified. CONCLUSIONS Galcanezumab was effective and safe during open-label treatment in patients who had experienced failures of previous migraine preventives. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03559257.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Reuter
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Martha D Port
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | - Russell M Nichols
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | - Chad Stroud
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | | | - Holland C Detke
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with migraine and history of failure to 3-4 preventive medication categories: subgroup analysis from CONQUER study. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:113. [PMID: 34592919 PMCID: PMC8482748 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01322-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) are associated with substantial headache-related disability, poor quality of life and global societal burden. In this subgroup analysis from the CONQUER study, we report efficacy outcomes from a pre-specified analysis of galcanezumab versus placebo in patients with CM or EM and 3–4 prior preventive medication category failures due to inadequate efficacy (after at least 2 months at maximum tolerated dose), or safety or tolerability reasons. The patient population is of particular interest due to evidence of decreased quality of life and increased economic burden among patients with migraine that is inadequately managed and is of interest to decision-makers globally. Methods Key outcomes included overall mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days and proportions of patients achieving ≥30% (CM), ≥50%, and ≥ 75% reduction (response rates) in monthly migraine headache days across Months 1–3. Patient functioning and disability were evaluated at Month 3. Results Of the 462 randomized patients, 186 (40.3%) had a history of 3–4 preventive category failures. Galcanezumab versus placebo resulted in significantly (P ≤ .001) larger overall mean reduction in monthly migraine headache days (total: − 5.49 versus − 1.03; CM: − 6.70 versus − 1.56; EM: − 3.64 versus − 0.65). Similarly, the ≥50% response rate was significantly (P ≤ .001) higher with galcanezumab versus placebo (total: 41.0 versus 12.7; CM: 41.5 versus 8.4; EM: 41.1 versus 16.5). In the CM group, the ≥30% response rate was significantly higher in the galcanezumab group than the placebo group (CM, 57.5 versus 19.8, P ≤ .0001) as was the ≥75% response rate (13.3 versus 2.6, P ≤ .05). Galcanezumab also resulted in significant (P < .0001) improvements in patient functioning and reductions in disability. Conclusions Galcanezumab was effective in a difficult-to-treat population of patients with CM or EM who had failed 3–4 prior preventive medication categories. Trial registration CONQUER. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03559257.
Collapse
|
11
|
Eigenbrodt AK, Ashina H, Khan S, Diener HC, Mitsikostas DD, Sinclair AJ, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P, Ducros A, Lantéri-Minet M, Braschinsky M, Del Rio MS, Daniel O, Özge A, Mammadbayli A, Arons M, Skorobogatykh K, Romanenko V, Terwindt GM, Paemeleire K, Sacco S, Reuter U, Lampl C, Schytz HW, Katsarava Z, Steiner TJ, Ashina M. Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17:501-514. [PMID: 34145431 PMCID: PMC8321897 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00509-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is a disabling primary headache disorder that directly affects more than one billion people worldwide. Despite its widespread prevalence, migraine remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. To support clinical decision-making, we convened a European panel of experts to develop a ten-step approach to the diagnosis and management of migraine. Each step was established by expert consensus and supported by a review of current literature, and the Consensus Statement is endorsed by the European Headache Federation and the European Academy of Neurology. In this Consensus Statement, we introduce typical clinical features, diagnostic criteria and differential diagnoses of migraine. We then emphasize the value of patient centricity and patient education to ensure treatment adherence and satisfaction with care provision. Further, we outline best practices for acute and preventive treatment of migraine in various patient populations, including adults, children and adolescents, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and older people. In addition, we provide recommendations for evaluating treatment response and managing treatment failure. Lastly, we discuss the management of complications and comorbidities as well as the importance of planning long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Eigenbrodt
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Håkan Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sabrina Khan
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- First Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Anne Ducros
- Neurology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Michel Lantéri-Minet
- Departement d'Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
| | | | | | - Oved Daniel
- Headache & Facial Pain Clinic, Laniado Medical Center, Netanya, Israel
| | - Aynur Özge
- Department of Neurology, Mersin University Medical Faculty, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Ayten Mammadbayli
- Department of Neurology, Azerbaijan State Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - Mihails Arons
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, P. Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | | | | | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Lampl
- Headache Medical Center, Seilerstaette Linz, Linz, Austria
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Henrik W Schytz
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany
- EVEX Medical Corporation, Tbilisi, Georgia
- Department of Nervous Diseases of the Institute of Professional Education, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Timothy J Steiner
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Nervous Diseases of the Institute of Professional Education, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
- Danish Knowledge Center on Headache Disorders, Glostrup, Denmark.
- Department of Neurology, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhao X, Xu X, Li Q. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 2021; 268:2364-2376. [PMID: 32006159 PMCID: PMC8217057 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab in the prophylactic treatment of adult migraine. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identity randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the decline in the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs). Secondary outcomes included the reduction of monthly acute migraine‑specific medication days (MSMDs), the number of participants showing a reduction in MMDs from baseline of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100%, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and the number of participants developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to galcanezumab. We calculated the mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for these outcomes. RESULTS Among the five included trials, galcanezumab given at doses of 120, 150, 240, and 300 mg was superior to placebo for both MMDs and secondary outcomes. The degree of AEs in all group was mild. Notably, no significant differences were found in the occurrence of AEs and ADAs between the galcanezumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSION Galcanezumab is a safe and effective treatment for adult patients with episodic and chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaolin Xu
- Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| | - Qingyun Li
- Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ashina M, Buse DC, Ashina H, Pozo-Rosich P, Peres MFP, Lee MJ, Terwindt GM, Halker Singh R, Tassorelli C, Do TP, Mitsikostas DD, Dodick DW. Migraine: integrated approaches to clinical management and emerging treatments. Lancet 2021; 397:1505-1518. [PMID: 33773612 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32342-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is a highly disabling neurological disorder that directly affects more than 1 billion individuals worldwide. Available treatment options differ between countries and include acute, preventive, and non-pharmacological therapies. Because of major progress in the understanding of migraine pathogenesis, novel mechanism-based medications have emerged and expanded the armamentarium of treatments. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current standard of care that will enable informed clinical management. First, we discuss the efficacy, tolerability, and safety profile of various pharmacological therapies for acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Second, we review the current knowledge on non-pharmacological therapies, such as neuromodulation and biobehavioural approaches, which can be used for a multidisciplinary approach to clinical management. Third, we emphasise that any effective treatment strategy starts with building a therapeutic plan tailored to individual clinical characteristics, preferences, and needs. Finally, we explore the outlook of emerging mechanism-based treatments that could address unmet challenges in clinical management of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Knowledge Center on Headache Disorders, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Nervous Diseases of the Institute of Professional Education, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Neurology, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan.
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Håkan Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario F P Peres
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Headache Science Centre, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare, Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Thien Phu Do
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- First Neurology Department, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blumenfeld AM, Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Hutchinson S, Liu C, Finnegan M, Trugman JM, Szegedi A. Efficacy of ubrogepant based on prior exposure and response to triptans: A post hoc analysis. Headache 2021; 61:422-429. [PMID: 33749826 PMCID: PMC8252782 DOI: 10.1111/head.14089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective To determine the potential efficacy of ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine based on historical experience with triptans. Background Although triptans have improved migraine treatment, their efficacy and tolerability may limit their utility in some individuals. Ubrogepant is a small‐molecule, oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute treatment of migraine in adults. Methods This post hoc analysis of pooled data from the pivotal trials ACHIEVE I and II, identically designed, randomized, double‐blind, phase 3, single‐attack trials of ubrogepant in adults with a history of migraine with/without aura, examined the efficacy and tolerability of ubrogepant 50 mg versus placebo based on participants’ historical experience with triptans: triptan responder, triptan‐insufficient responder, and triptan naïve. Co‐primary efficacy endpoints were pain freedom and absence of most bothersome migraine‐associated symptom (MBS) 2 h post initial dose. Adverse events (AEs) within historical triptan experience subgroups were evaluated. Results In the pooled analysis population (n = 1799), 682 (placebo, n = 350; ubrogepant 50 mg, n = 332), 451 (placebo, n = 223; ubrogepant, n = 228), and 666 (placebo, n = 339; ubrogepant, n = 327) participants were triptan responders, triptan‐insufficient responders, and triptan‐naïve, respectively. Response rates on co‐primary efficacy endpoints were higher for ubrogepant versus placebo across all groups. Treatment‐by‐subgroup interaction p values based on odds ratios for pain freedom (p = 0.290) and absence of MBS (p = 0.705) indicated no significant impact of historical triptan experience on ubrogepant efficacy. AE incidence for ubrogepant did not differ appreciably across historical triptan experience subgroups. Conclusions Ubrogepant efficacy and tolerability did not differ for the acute treatment of migraine in participants classified as triptan responders, triptan‐insufficient responders, and triptan‐naïve based on their historical experience with triptans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Blumenfeld
- The Neurology Center, Headache Center of Southern California, Carlsbad, CA, USA
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College, London, UK.,University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Susan Hutchinson
- Department of Headache, Orange County Migraine and Headache Center, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Galcanezumab: A Review in the Prevention of Migraine and Treatment of Episodic Cluster Headache. Drugs 2021; 80:893-904. [PMID: 32504377 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01329-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Galcanezumab (Emgality®) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), thereby inhibiting its physiological activity, with CGRP playing a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine and headache disorders. In pivotal phase 3 trials, recommended dosages of subcutaneous galcanezumab once monthly were significantly more effective than placebo as preventive therapy in adults with episodic (EVOLVE-1 and -2; over 6 months) or chronic (REGAIN; over 3 months) migraine (± aura), including in patients who had failed several prior preventive migraine drugs (CONQUER; over 3 months). The beneficial effects of galcanezumab preventive treatment in reducing the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs) and improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) were sustained during up to 1 year of treatment. In adults with episodic cluster headache, galcanezumab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the weekly frequency of cluster headache attacks across weeks 1-3 compared with placebo (primary endpoint), albeit during weeks 4-8, there was a convergence of results between these treatment groups. Although further evidence from the clinical setting is required to determine its long-term safety profile, given its convenient administration regimen, efficacy and short-term tolerability profile, monthly galcanezumab represents an important emerging option for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine (± aura) and the treatment of episodic cluster headache.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Migraine is a common and disabling disorder affecting approximately 1.02 billion people worldwide. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as playing an important role in the pathophysiology of migraine and several migraine-specific therapies targeting the CGRP ligand or its receptor have been approved since 2018 for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. This review focuses on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability of galcanezumab, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Frerichs
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Dallas, TX 75390, USA.,Department of Neurology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave. Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Deborah I Friedman
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Dallas, TX 75390, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shibata M. [Novel migraine treatment with CGRP-related monoclonal antibodies]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2020; 60:668-676. [PMID: 32893246 DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is a common and debilitating neurological disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of moderate to severe throbbing headache accompanied by nausea, vomiting and photophobia/phonophobia. Because of its high prevalence, migraine causes a considerable financial burden on the society as well as impaired quality of life in individual patients. Scientific evidence shows that migraine is a quite complex neurological disorder that involves not only the trigeminovascular and autonomic systems but also the hypothalamus and cerebral cortex. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was originally discovered as a 37-amino acid neuropeptide derived from a calcitonin gene splicing variant. CGRP is found to be expressed in trigeminal ganglion neurons. Much attention has been attracted to this molecule since CGRP was found to be released from trigeminal terminals in animal migraine models. Subsequent studies demonstrated that CGRP administration induced migraine-like headache attacks specifically in migraineurs, thus highlighting a pivotal role of CGRP in the development of migraine attacks. Several CGRP receptor antagonists were shown to be efficacious for the treatment of acute migraine. Among them, telcagepant, was shown to exert a significant migraine prophylactic action as well. Nevertheless, the development of most of these agents were discontinued due to hepatotoxicity. Currently, newer CGRP receptor antagonists are being developed. On the other hand, monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP and its receptor showed consistent efficacy for migraine prophylaxis with excellent safety profiles in Phase III clinical trials. Furthermore, emerging data support the long-term safety and efficacy of these antibodies. In this review article, the development and perspective of anti-migraine therapeutic strategies using CGRP-related antibodies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamoru Shibata
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mulleners WM, Kim BK, Láinez MJA, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang S, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Aurora SK, Nichols RM, Yunes-Medina L, Detke HC. Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19:814-825. [PMID: 32949542 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30279-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients who require migraine preventive treatment have not been able to tolerate or have not responded to multiple previous preventive medications. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of galcanezumab, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, in patients with migraine who had not benefited from preventive medications from two to four categories. METHODS CONQUER was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial done at 64 sites (hospitals, clinics, or research centres) in 12 countries (Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Japan, the Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, the UK, and the USA). Patients were 18-75 years of age, with episodic or chronic migraine, with migraine onset before the age of 50 years, who had a documented failure of preventive medications from two to four drug categories in the past 10 years owing to lack of efficacy or tolerability, or both. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive subcutaneous placebo or galcanezumab 120 mg per month (with a 240 mg loading dose administered as two 120 mg injections) for 3 months. For masking purposes, patients receiving placebo also received two injections during the first dosing visit. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated random sequence by means of an interactive web-response system stratified by country and migraine frequency (low frequency episodic migraine, four to fewer than eight migraine headache days per month; high frequency episodic migraine, eight to 14 migraine headache days per month and fewer than 15 headache days per month; chronic migraine, at least eight migraine headache days per month and at least 15 headache days per month). The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in number of monthly migraine headache days during the 3-month treatment period in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03559257, and is now completed. FINDINGS Between Sept 10, 2018, and March 21, 2019, 462 participants with episodic (269 [58%]) or chronic (193 [42%]) migraine were randomly assigned and received at least one injection with placebo (n=230) or galcanezumab (n=232). Galcanezumab-treated patients had significantly greater reduction in migraine headache days versus placebo across months 1-3. The galcanezumab group had on average 4·1 fewer monthly migraine headache days compared with baseline (13·4), while the placebo group had on average 1·0 fewer than at baseline (13·0; between-group difference -3·1 [95% CI -3·9 to -2·3]; p<0·0001; effect size=0·72). Types and number of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between galcanezumab and placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 122 (53%) of 230 patients in the placebo group and 119 (51%) of 232 patients in the galcanezumab group. There were four serious adverse events during the study, two (1%) reported in the placebo group and two (1%) reported in the galcanezumab group. INTERPRETATION Galcanezumab was superior to placebo in the preventive treatment of migraine and was safe and well tolerated in patients for whom multiple previous standard-of-care preventive treatments had failed. Galcanezumab might represent an important treatment option for patients who have not benefited from or tolerated previous standard-of-care treatments. FUNDING Eli Lilly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim M Mulleners
- Neurology Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Byung-Kun Kim
- Neurology Department, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Miguel J A Láinez
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- Pain Department CHU Nice and FHU InovPain Côte Azur University, Nice, France; INSERM/UdA, U1107, Neuro-Dol, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Department de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ruscheweyh R, Broessner G, Goßrau G, Heinze-Kuhn K, Jürgens TP, Kaltseis K, Kamm K, Peikert A, Raffaelli B, Rimmele F, Evers S. Effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide (-receptor) antibodies in chronic cluster headache: Results from a retrospective case series support individual treatment attempts. Cephalalgia 2020; 40:1574-1584. [PMID: 32806953 PMCID: PMC7691634 DOI: 10.1177/0333102420949866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin
gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor in chronic cluster headache
(CCH) treatment under real world conditions. Background Calcitonin gene-related peptide has an important pathophysiological role in
cluster headache. Although the randomised controlled trial with the
calcitonin gene-related peptide antibody galcanezumab was negative, chronic
cluster headache patients with insufficient response to other preventive
treatments have been receiving individual off-label treatment attempts with
calcitonin gene-related peptide-(receptor) antibodies. Methods Data from 22 chronic cluster headache patients who received at least one dose
of a calcitonin gene-related peptide(-receptor) antibody and recorded attack
frequency in a headache diary were retrospectively collected at eight
headache centres. Results The number of previous preventive therapies was 6.5 ± 2.4 (mean ± standard
deviation, range: 2–11). The average number of attacks per week was
23.3 ± 16.4 at baseline and significantly decreased by −9.2 ± 9.7 in the
first month of treatment with a calcitonin gene-related peptide(-receptor)
antibody (p < 0.001). Fifty-five percent of the patients
were 50% responders and 36% were 75% responders with respect to attack
frequency. Significant reduction of attack frequency started at week 1
(−6.8 ± 2.8 attacks, p < 0.01). Results were
corroborated by significant decreases in weekly uses of acute headache
medication (−9.8 ± 7.6, p < 0.001) and pain intensity
during attacks (−1.2 ± 2.0, numerical rating scale (NRS) [0–10],
p < 0.01) in the first month. In months 2 (n = 14)
and 3 (n = 10), reduction of attack frequency from baseline was −8.0 ± 8.4
(p = 0.004) and −9.1 ± 10.0
(p = 0.024), respectively. Conclusion Under real-world conditions, individual treatment with calcitonin
gene-related peptide(-receptor) antibodies was effective in 55% of our
chronic cluster headache patients. This finding supports individual
off-label treatment attempts with calcitonin gene-related peptide-(receptor)
antibodies in chronic cluster headache patients insufficiently responding to
other therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Department of Neurology, Munich, Germany
| | - Gregor Broessner
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gudrun Goßrau
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Interdisciplinary Pain Center, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Tim P Jürgens
- Headache Center North-East, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Katharina Kaltseis
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Department of Neurology, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Peikert
- Neurologicum Bremen Outpatient Center for Neurology and Psychiatry, Bremen, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neurology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Rimmele
- Headache Center North-East, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Stefan Evers
- Department of Neurology, Krankenhaus Lindenbrunn, Coppenbrügge, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goadsby PJ, Terwindt GM, Ruff DD, Ford JH, Tockhorn‐Heidenreich A, Stauffer VL, Govindan S, Aurora SK. Response to ‘Do different treatment strategies of galcanezumab have similar effect on migraine?’. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27:e25. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.14168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
21
|
Huang IH, Wu PC, Lee YH, Kang YN. Do different treatment strategies of galcanezumab have a similar effect on migraine? Eur J Neurol 2019; 27:e19-e20. [PMID: 31846550 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I-H Huang
- Department of Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - P-C Wu
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Y-H Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Y-N Kang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Research center Big Data and Meta-analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|